Democracy Spraffa

Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee -11 June 2025

Argyll and Bute Council · 10 September 2025
Back to Oban Lorn & The Isles Area Committee — 10 September 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

MINUTES of MEETING of OBAN LORN & THE ISLES AREA COMMITTEE held ON A HYBRID
BASIS ON MICROSOFT TEAMS AND IN AN ROTH, CRAIGNURE, ISLE OF MULL 
on WEDNESDAY, 11 JUNE 2025 
Present: Councillor Andrew Kain (Chair) 
Councillor Kieron Green
Councillor Amanda Hampsey
Councillor Willie Hume 
Councillor Luna Martin
Councillor Andrew Vennard 
Attending: Douglas Hendry, Executive Director
David Logan, Head of Legal and Regulatory Support
Melissa Stewart, Democratic Services Manager
Tom Murphy, Operations Manager
Brendan Docherty, Education Manager
Peter Bain, Head Teacher, Oban and Tiree High School(s)
Shelley Carmichael, Head Teacher, Tobermory High School 
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 
The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. 
Apologies for absence were intimated on behalf of Councillors Jim Lynch and Julie
McKenzie.   
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
There were no declarations of interest intimated.   
3. MINUTES 
(a) Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee - 12 March 2025 
The Minute of the meeting of the Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area
Committee, held on 13 March 2025, was approved as a correct record
subject to the following amendment:- 
Item 4 – Public Question Time (Question 4 – Ross Wilson) 
To amend the spelling of Councillor Kain’s name at the second last
paragraph on page 3 of the Minute from Kane to Kain. 
(b) Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Community Planning Group - 14 May
2025 
The Minute of the meeting of the Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area
Community Planning Group, held on 14 May 2025 was noted.

Page 2

(c) Oban Common Good Fund - 17 March 2025 
The Minute of the meeting of the Oban Common Good Fund, held on 17
March 2025 was noted.   
Councillors Amanda Hampsey and Luna Martin joined the meeting during
discussions of the following item of business.  
.
4. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME 
The Chair advised that a number of public questions had been submitted in advance
of the meeting.  He also noted that there were a number of members of the public in
attendance who had intimated that they wished to ask a question.  He advised that
his intention was to take the questions submitted in advance first and then open the
floor to those in attendance.  
The questions were submitted in the following order:-
Question 1 – Jennifer Evans
Evans Funfair submitted an application to hold their annual Fun Fair at Blaze Pitch
Mossfield in February 2025 to Amenity Services, they have not received an
acknowledgement or any confirmation.  They have heard that the Waterboard are
working on the site and do not know how long that is going to go on for, therefore is
there an alternative site available for September or can they have confirmation that
the works will be complete and they are able to use the Blaze Pitch as normal?
The Operations Manager advised that Scottish Water were carrying out works at the
blaze pitch on Mossfield and that it was anticipated that they would still be on-site in
September.  He advised that he was currently awaiting confirmation from the
Network and Standards Manager as to whether Lochavullin Carpark would be
available to use as an alternative to site the annual fun fair and he would confirm the
position with Mrs Evans in due course. 
Question 2 – Frank Roberts 
On 24 January Storm Eowyn caused significant damage to the pontoon berths
adjacent to the North Pier, particularly to sections of the floating breakwater. 
Consequently, the outer two sections of the breakwater are now closed “until further
notice", and the inner section subject to restrictions for the time being of the number
and size of vessels which may use them.  (EDI Committee, March 2025: Notice to
Mariners # 04/25, May 2nd 2025).  The breakwater being out of commission is
having severe adverse effects on both commercial and leisure users of it.
At a recent meeting of the Oban Bay Management Group, it was stated that it was
not possible to say when repairs might be completed and full use of the breakwater
restored, but that it was not likely before an as yet indeterminate date in 2026.

Page 3

It is now four months since the storm, and surveys of the damage are reported to
have been conducted.  Therefore, can the Area Committee respond to the following
questions, please:
1. Has the full extent of the damage and necessary repairs been
determined?
2. Has an initial schedule of those repairs been developed?
3. Do either of the outer sections of breakwater require to be rebuilt and
replaced?
4. What is the anticipated latest date for completion of repairs, and the
breakwater to be fully re-opened for use?
5. Will the EDI Committee be given a full report on progress at its meeting
later this month?
The Democratic Services Manager confirmed that the question(s) had been
forwarded to the Council’s Roads and Infrastructure Service and enquired as to
whether the Operations Manager was able to provide an update in this regard.  Mr
Murphy confirmed that he was unaware of the position in relation to the questions. 
He undertook to take forward with the Council’s Marine Operations Manager
following the meeting and ensure a response was provided to Mr Roberts directly. 
Question 3 – Terry Hegarty
How exactly does Argyll and Bute Council reconcile the legal rights of children to
enjoy the benefits of family life and equality of educational opportunity with
continuing reliance upon mainland hostel arrangements for children resident in SW
Mull attending High School in Oban?
The Democratic Services Manager advised that as this question related to the Mull
Campus Project, she had taken advice from the Council’s Legal Services.  Mrs
Stewart confirmed that a Judicial Review had been served on the Council, in regard
to that project and as the matter is now subject to Court Proceedings it would not be
appropriate to provide a response or have any discussion on the matter, or any other
question that may arise at the meeting relating to the Mull Campus Project. 
Question 4 – Nigel Burgess
1. What was the procurement process for awarding the contract to build Iona
Breakwater?
2. Why was the contract awarded to a dredging Company when the EIA report
clearly stated that dredging would be required subsequent to the construction due
to sedimentation?
3. Where is the £14.8 million budget coming from? This does not appear in the
Transport Scotland infrastructure budget

Page 4

4. Why was the advice of the Planning Statutory Consultee Naturescot not followed
to investigate and mitigate for seagrass?
5. What will be the addition cost of the seagrass investigation, subsequent to the
contract preliminaries?
6. What will be the increase to the contract price as a consequence of these
delays?
The Democratic Services Manager confirmed that the questions raised by Mr
Burgess were more aligned to a Freedom of Information request.  She undertook to
signpost Mr Burgess to the process for lodging a Freedom of Information request. 
Question 5 – Mary Braithwaite
Why has there been a change to care at home provision on Luing, with the care
provider no longer willing to work with family carers? This was introduced with no
notice, and it has so far been impossible to obtain any information on this change in
policy. It has already impacted care and the situation of families on Luing and is of
significant concern to the community in terms of current and future care.
The Chair confirmed that this was an issue which was felt across the Council area
and was also a concern for Elected Members.  
Councillor Green, Chair of the Argyll and Bute HSCP Audit and Risk Committee
advised that he was looking to progress this matter with the appropriate personnel
within the HSCP and would work with Committee Services to avoid a duplication of
questions. 
Question 6 – Tracy Mayo
Ms Mayo sought clarification in relation to the platform the meeting was taking place
on.  She advised that she was aware of members of the public who were not in a
position to attend the meeting but had anticipated watching the live stream via the
Council’s Public-i portal.  
Councillor Green indicated that only meetings hosted from the Council Chamber
were livestreamed but that officers would confirm the position.  The Democratic
Services Manager confirmed that meetings of the Area Committee are not webcast
live due to a restriction of the mobile equipment utilised to facilitate meetings that are
not held within the Council Chamber.  She further clarified that the teams link
provided in respect of the meeting would allow members of the public to participate
in public questions or simply watch proceedings in the same way that a webcast
would.   
Question 7 – Tracy Mayo

Page 5

Referring to an invite extended to the Council by Jenni Minto MSP to attend an
online roundtable discussion on Mull Campus on Friday, 13 June 2025, Ms Mayo
enquired as to why the Council had declined the invitation.
The Chair referred to the earlier advice provided by the Democratic Services
Manager in relation to any question on the Mull Campus Project and reiterated that,
as there was a legal process in place, no discussion would be had in any regard to
the Mull Campus Project.   
Question 8 – Roddy McCuish
Mr McCuish advised that he was in attendance in his capacity as both Director of the
Camanachd Association and as President of the Macaulay Association.  Referring to
the decision of the Committee at their meeting on 12 March 2025 to allocate funding
available from the Agnes Angus Bequest for use at Mossfield Stadium, he took the
opportunity to thank the Committee and sought clarity that the funding would be
utilised for improvements at Mossfield Stadium and not the wider area. 
The Operations Manager referred to discussions that had taken place with the
Rugby Club and others in the town as well as colleagues in Property Services
around the possibility of linking amenity areas, such as reinstating the bridge and
other possible uses.  He advised that a further report would be brought to a future
meeting of the Area Committee before the end of the year which would outline
proposals that related specifically to Mossfield Stadium.  Mr Murphy offered to meet
with Mr McCuish in person to discuss further.   
Question 9 – Emily Greenhalgh
Referring to the earlier question raised by Tracy Mayo on the roundtable discussion
with Jenni Minto MSP, Ms Greenhalgh advised that the invitation had been extended
to the Council on 5 June 2025 and the Council were not notified of legal action until 7
June 2025.  She asked why the invite to the roundtable discussion was refused
before the Council were aware of the legal action.
The Executive Director outlined the nature of the invitation to the roundtable
discussion on 13 June 2025.  He advised that following consultation with the Political
Leadership and the Chief Executive, he had been asked to write to the MSP
confirming that the Council would not be attending.  He advised that it was his
understanding that the event had now been cancelled and at no point had he
intimated that the invite had been declined as a consequence of the legal action
having been notified.   
Question 10 – Frank Roberts on behalf of Alison Rennie

Page 6

Having noted an email exchange between Alison Rennie and the Council’s Roads
and Infrastructure Services, Mr Roberts read out the most recent email from Ms
Rennie to the Service and asked that answers be sought.
“Dear Roads and Infrastructure
Your recent e-mail raises a number of questions which require to be clarified, please.
In December 2024 you informed me that you had identified Oban as a proposed
Flood Protection Scheme. At that time the Council had not secured funding for this.
In the meantime you were progressing temporary mitigations under the Flood Risk
Management team’s available revenue funding and proposed to carry out a list of
identified works and advised me regarding the proposed timescale for these works.
Your latest email tells me that your in-house flood event modelling now shows that
no works need to be done. This is contrary to what you said would happen in your
December email and is not consistent with the advice given in the Enviro Centre
2019 report. This report even included a recommended list of specific priority
maintenance actions.
Can you clarify whether you intend to carry out the routine maintenance as listed in
your December email?
Can you specifically clarify whether work is to be carried out on the eradication of
Japanese Knotweed in Q3?
Can you tell me what steps have been taken to secure funding from the Scottish
Government for the proposed Flood Protection Scheme, particularly in light of the
commitment made at the ED&I Committee meeting in June 2024?
Note that no screenshots were attached to your email to demonstrate the modelling
of the flood water level difference within the Lochavullin area before and after
dredging.
Regards
Alison Rennie”
The Democratic Services Manager referred to the response that she had been
copied into from the Service in relation to the email referred to.  She undertook to
forward this email to both Ms Rennie, Mr Roberts and the Operations Manager and
sought further comments from the Operations Manager in relation to the Japanese
Knotweed issue referred to. 
Mr Murphy advised that he would take forward the issues relating to the flood risk in
Oban to his colleagues within the Design and Infrastructure team and advised that
he had organised for additional training to be provided in relation to the management
of Japanese Knotweed.   
Question 11 – Tracy Mayo

Page 7

Referring back to the invitation from Jenni Minto MSP for the Council to attend a
roundtable discussion on the Mull Campus Project, Ms Mayo asked whether the
decision to decline the invite was taken by all 36 Elected Members; the 4 Ward
Councillors or simply by the Council’s Executive Leadership Team.  
The Chair reiterated that as this matter is now subject of a legal action, no discussion
could take place in this regard. 
5. AREA PERFORMANCE REPORT - FQ4 2024/25 
The Committee gave consideration to the Area Performance Report for financial
quarter 4 of 2024/25 (January to March 2025) which illustrated the agreed
performance measures for this period.   
Decision 
The Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee noted the performance and
supporting commentary as presented.   
(Reference:  Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Customer Support
Services, dated 8 May 2025, submitted) 
6. ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE 
Consideration was given to a report which provided links to the recent activities of
Roads and Infrastructure Services. 
Decision 
The Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee noted the contents of the report. 
(Reference:  Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Roads and
Infrastructure Services, dated May 2025, submitted) 
7. ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL SECONDARY SCHOOLS ATTAINMENT
REPORTS 
(a) Oban High School 
The Committee gave consideration to a report relating to Oban High
School  which provided information on S3 ACEL attainment in literacy and
numeracy; the pass rates of national qualifications; data from Insight
Scotland; wider achievement qualifications; equity and attainment and
Pupil Equity Funding.   
Decision

Page 8

The Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee noted the information
provided within the report.   
(Reference:  Report by Executive Director with responsibility for
Education, submitted) 
(b) Tiree High School 
Consideration was given to a report relating to Tiree High School  which
provided information on S3 ACEL attainment in literacy and numeracy; the
pass rates of national qualifications; data from Insight Scotland; wider
achievement qualifications; equity and attainment and Pupil Equity
Funding.   
Decision 
The Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee noted the information
provided within the report.   
(Reference:  Report by Executive Director with responsibility for
Education, submitted) 
(c) Tobermory High School 
The Committee gave consideration to a report relating to Tobermory High
School  which provided information on S3 ACEL attainment in literacy and
numeracy; the pass rates of national qualifications; data from Insight
Scotland; wider achievement qualifications; equity and attainment and
Pupil Equity Funding.   
Decision 
The Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee noted the information
provided within the report.   
(Reference:  Report by Executive Director with responsibility for
Education, submitted) 
8. ARGYLL & BUTE HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE PARTNERSHIP
PERFORMANCE REPORT 
The Committee gave consideration to the Health and Social Care Partnership
(HSCP) Performance Report for financial quarter 3 of 2024/25 (October to December
2024). 
Decision 
The Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee: 
1. acknowledged the performance for FQ3 2024/25 (October – December);

Page 9

2. acknowledged the performance update on the National Health & Wellbeing
Outcomes and Ministerial Steering Groups Integration Indicators, as at Appendix
1; and 
3. noted Delayed Discharge Sitrep as of 6 January 2025, as at Appendix 2. 
(Reference:  Report by Interim Head of Strategic Planning, Performance and
Technology, Argyll and Bute Health and Social Care Partnership, dated 4 June 2025,
submitted) 
9. AREA COMMITTEE MEETINGS 2025-26 
Consideration was given to a report which asked Members to agree to the suggested
locations for meetings up until June 2026.   
Decision 
The Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee agreed that the meetings until June
2026 would be held as follows:- 
10 September 2025 – Dalavich
10 December 2025 – Oban
11 March 2026 – Taynuilt
10 June 2026 – Tiree 
(Reference:  Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Legal and
Regulatory Support, dated 1 May 2025, submitted) 
10. CHARITABLE TRUSTS, BEQUEST AND TRUST FUNDS 
Consideration was given to a report which provided information regarding a number
of applications that had been received for support from several funds.  The report
also reviewed the distribution arrangements of the MacKinnon Ledingham Bequest,
the Archibald Dow Bequest and Coals for the Poor Oban, following the first 12
months of distribution arrangements for these funds. 
The Democratic Services Manager advised of an error contained within the
recommendations at paragraph 2.1 of the report.  She advised that there were three
individual applications to the MacKinnon Ledingham Bequest, as outlined within the
body of the report and not two as outlined within the recommendations.   
Decision 
The Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee:- 
1. noted the awards made from the John of Lorn Bequest since March 2025; 
2. agreed to award £50 to the three individual applicants who meet the criteria of the
MacKinnon Ledingham Bequest; 
3. agreed to award £50 to the two individual applicants who meet the criteria of the
Archibald Dow Bequest;

Page 10

4. agreed to award £50 to one individual applicant who meets the criteria of the
Coals for the Poor Oban; and 
5. noted that the charitable trusts, bequests and trust funds annual report will be
considered in December 2025 and that further promotion of the availability of the
funds will be undertaken. 
(Reference:  Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Legal and
Regulatory Support, dated May 2025, submitted) 
11. DRAFT OBAN, LORN AND THE ISLES AREA COMMITTEE WORKPLAN 
The Committee gave consideration to the Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee
workplan for future meetings. 
Decision 
The Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee noted the contents of the workplan. 
(Reference:  Oban, Lorn and the Isles Area Committee Workplan, dated 11 June
2025, submitted)