Democracy Spraffa

Annual Housing Performance Benchmarking Report 2021-22 and Tenant Satisfaction Survey 2022

Renfrewshire Council · 25 October 2022
Back to Communities and Housing Policy Board — 25 October 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

___________________________________________________________________
To: Communities and Housing Policy Board 
On: 25 October 2022
___________________________________________________________________ 
Report by: Director of Communities & Housing Services
___________________________________________________________________ 
Heading: Annual Housing Performance Benchmarking Report 2021/22 and
Tenant Satisfaction Survey 2022
___________________________________________________________________
1. Summary 
1.1 This report provides information on the Council’s performance in 2021/22 on
key Social Housing Charter indicators compared to other local authorities and
Registered Social Landlords (RSLs). 
1.2 The report also provides further information in relation to the Tenant
Satisfaction Survey reported to the last meeting of the Policy Board, including
the Executive Summary and link to the full document which together with the
Benchmarking Report will be used to inform the ongoing improvement work of
the Service.
___________________________________________________________________
2. Recommendations 
2.1 It is recommended that the Policy Board: 
(i) Notes the Council’s performance in 2021/22 on key Housing Charter
indicators compared to other social landlords and the terms of the
Tenant Satisfaction Survey set out in Appendix 1. 
(ii) Authorises the Director of Communities & Housing to use the
information set out in the Benchmarking Report, Tenant Satisfaction
Survey and other performance related documents to continue the
programme for ongoing improvement in the delivery and operations of
the Council’s Housing function to ensure that the quality of service to
meet the needs of tenants is maintained and enhanced.

Page 2

3. Background 
3.1 The Scottish Social Housing Charter enables each social housing provider to
compare its performance against all social landlords in Scotland.  The Annual
Charter Return consists of 32 performance indicators and 14 contextual
indicators and is submitted to the Scottish Housing Regulator (SHR) at the
end of May each year.  A report on Renfrewshire Council’s performance
against the Charter in 2020/21 was presented to the Policy Board in August
2021.  
3.2 Renfrewshire Council is a member of Scotland’s Housing Network which
collects data from participating landlords and produces benchmarking
information.  The benchmarking data from Scotland’s Housing Network allows
the Council to compare performance with a peer group of 26 local authorities. 
This report draws on that peer group data to benchmark Renfrewshire
Council’s performance in 2020/21.
3.3 In addition, comparison with all landlords from the Scottish Housing
Regulator’s Charter data is included (i.e. including all Registered Social
Landlords in Scotland, irrespective of size) to allow comparison with a
Scotland-wide average.  
3.4 As reported to the Policy Board in August, Renfrewshire Council’s 2020/21
Charter Return highlighted the impact of the pandemic on the Housing
service.  Benchmarking is designed to assist with service improvement
planning through comparison with other organisations.  Key benchmarking
results are summarised below.
3.5 This shows where Renfrewshire Council performs well compared to other
social landlords as well as several areas where there is scope for further
improvement.  Nationally performance has been affected by the pandemic
and in particular there has been a major effect on voids and re-let timescales.
Other outcomes have been affected, with a wide variation across local
authorities in impact.  For example, tenancy sustainment has improved and
there have been fewer evictions.
3.6 A full list of the Charter performance indicators for 2020/21 is provided at
paragraph 4.8 of this report along with the Scotland Housing Network peer
group average for 2020/21 and the Scotland-wide average published by the
Scottish Housing Regulator for 2020/21. 
4. Benchmarking Analysis 2020/21
4.1 Tenant Satisfaction 
Renfrewshire Council collects this information from a Tenant Satisfaction 
Survey which is carried out every two years by external consultants.  The 
most recent survey was carried out in Spring 2022 and the headline results
were reported to the Policy Board in August this year as part of the report on
the Annual return on the Scottish Social Housing Charter.

Page 3

The Executive Summary of the Tenant Satisfaction Survey is attached to
Appendix 1 of this Report and a link to the full document is provided for
Members. The Survey along with the Performance and Benchmarking
Updates will be used to inform the areas programme of ongoing improvement
and commitments to meeting the needs of tenants that will be the subject to
ongoing reports to this Policy Board.
Members can access the link to the Tenant Satisfaction Survey below: 
https://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/Tenants 
From the previous survey tenant satisfaction with the overall service provided
by the Council has dropped to 82.4% from 88.8%.  This is similar to the SHN
group average of 82.7% in 2021/22 but below the Scottish average of 87.7%
(21/22). 
There are areas of improvement, notably the percentage of tenants who feel
rent represents value for money, this has increased to 83.4% and is better
than both the SHN (81.2%) and Scottish averages (82.5%). 
4.2 Customer and Landlord Relationship
 91% of Renfrewshire Council tenants were satisfied with the way the
Council keeps tenants informed.  This compares favourably against the
SHN (85.4%) and the Scottish (91.2%) averages. 
 Similarly, 99% of Renfrewshire Council tenants said they were satisfied
with ‘opportunities to participate’, a 5 percentage-point improvement
from the previous survey in 2020/21, and considerably better than the
SHN group average of 80.4% and also well above the Scottish average
of 86.8%. 
 In 2021/22, 95.9% of all 1st stage complaints were responded to in full,
which is better than the SHN group average of 95.2%%, but slightly
below the Scottish average of 96.8%.   96.2% of all 2nd stage
complaints were responded to in full within Renfrewshire which better
than both the SHN (92.8%) and Scottish (93.8%) averages.
4.3 Housing Quality and Maintenance
 As a direct consequence of the Council’s programme of EICR checks
and smoke detector upgrades the Percentage of stock meeting the
Scottish Housing Quality Standard (SHQS) (Indicator 6) dropped this
year to 57%. The SHN average for SHQS compliance was 72% and
the Scottish average was just over 74%.  Both of these figures reflect a
trend nationally in a reduction for SHQS compliance. This programme
is nearing completion and our compliance with SHQS will increase
significantly in next year’s return.

Page 4

 79.9%of tenants were satisfied with the quality of their home, this is
lower than both the SHN group average (81.2%) and the Scottish
average (85.4%).  This appears to be a trend across Scottish landlords
over the past year, where satisfaction levels in this indicator are
dropping.   
 Renfrewshire Council’s average time to complete emergency repairs
increased slightly to 7.1 hours from 6.2 hours in the previous year. 
This is longer than the SHN group average (4.5 hours) and the Scottish
average (4.2 hours). 
 The average time to complete non-emergency repairs was 14.6 days. 
This is longer than the SHN group average (9 days) and the Scottish
average (8.9 days). 
 85% of non-emergency repairs were completed ‘right first time’ which is
about the same as last year but lower than the SHN average (89.1%)
and the Scottish average for 2020/21(88.3%). 
 95% of tenants who had repairs carried out were satisfied with the
repairs service.  This is better than last year (92%), and better than
both the SHN average (87.2%) and the Scottish average (88%). 
4.4 Estate Management, Anti-social Behaviour, Neighbourhood Nuisance,
Tenant Disputes
 87% of tenants were satisfied with their landlord’s contribution to the
management of the neighbourhood, this has improved from the
previous return (84.5%) and is better than both the SHN average of
81.5%. and the Scottish average 85.1%. 
 The Council’s rate of refusal of tenancy offers has returned to pre
pandemic levels at 39.6%,  this is broadly similar to the SHN average
(38.3%) but higher than the Scottish average (32.9%).   
 99.7% of anti-social behaviour cases were resolved.  This is better than
the SHN average (94%) and the Scottish average (94.7%).
4.5 Housing Options and Access to Housing
 8.3% of lettable houses became vacant during the year which is an
increase from last year’s figure of 6.6%.  This is due to an increase in
letting activity after the pandemic.  Renfrewshire Council’s turnover is
slightly higher than the SHN average (7.6%) and the Scottish average
(7.8%). 
 It took an average of 66 days to re-let properties this is considerably
better than last year’s figure of 85.7 days. This indicator remains
seriously impacted by pandemic restrictions.  Wide differences in
performance remain between local authorities, ranging from 124 days

Page 5

to 21 days.  The SHN average was 55.5 days, and the Scottish
average was 51.6 days.   
 The average time to complete approved medical adaptations in
2021/22 was also affected by the pandemic restrictions as the average
days increased to 142 days from 79 days. The SHN average increased
to 52.1 days and the Scottish average reduced to an average of 54
days.   
 The Council’s tenancy sustainment figure has improved slightly 92% to
92.2% of all new tenancies sustained for more than a year.  This is
marginally better than both the SHN average and the Scottish average
who sit at around 91%. 
 The rate of tenancy sustainment for new tenants who were formerly
homeless continues to improve (89.4%) and is comparable to the SHN
and the Scottish averages (90.2%).
4.6 Homelessness
 32% of homeless households were referred to RSLs under ‘Section 5’
arrangements and through other referral routes which is higher than the
SHN average of 26.7% and the SHR average of 27.4% 
4.7 Good Value from Rents & Service Charges
 The amount of rent collected as a proportion of the total rent due in the
reporting year was 98.2% which is slightly below both the SHN average
of 98.7% and the Scottish average of 99.1%.   
 The gross value of rent arrears as a percentage of rent due dipped in
2021/22 to 7.99% from 6.4%. Performance on gross rent arrears
remains better than the SHN group average (8.2%) but higher than the
Scottish average (6.3%). 
 At 2% the proportion of rent lost through empty properties is above the
SHN group average of 1.5% and the Scottish average of 1.4%.   
4.8  Generally the legacy of the pandemic continues to present a number of
specific challenges for the service, notably in terms of repairs, voids
turnaround time and adaptations.  These have been adversely affected with
issues of supplies, materials and resources available to complete jobs. The
Service will continue to address these challenges by using external
contractors to assist our in-house service provider in meeting these demands.

Page 6

4.9 Housing Charter Indicators 
INDICATOR
Renfrewshire Council S H N
(1)
S H R
(2)
17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 DOT 21/22 21/22
1  % satisfied with the overall
service provided 88.0% 88.0% 88.8% 88.8% 82.4%  82.7% 87.7%
2 % satisfied with keeping
tenants informed 82.2% 82.2% 88.4% 88.4% 91.1%  85.4% 91.2%
3
% of all complaints
responded to in full at 1st
stage  
n/a n/a 99.7% 100% 95.9%  95.2% 96.8%
% of all complaints
responded to in full at 2nd
stage 
n/a n/a 94.1% 100% 96.2%  92.8% 93.8%
4 Average time in working days
for a full response at Stage 1  n/a n/a 3.6 4.97 6.6  7.4 5.8
Average time in working days
for a full response at Stage 2  n/a n/a 14.6 13.9 16.6  40 27.4
5 % satisfied with opportunities
to participate 87.8% 87.8% 93.7% 93.7% 99%  80.4% 86.8%
6 % meeting the SHQS %
stock  93.5% 94.3% 94.6% *80.1% 57.1%  72% 74.6%
7 % Satisfied with quality of
home 83.9% 83.9% 86.1% 86.1% 79.9%  81.2% 85.4%
8
Average length of time taken
to complete emergency
repairs (hours)
5.1 5.1 5.5 6.2 7.1  4.5 4.2
9
Average length of time taken
to complete non-emergency
repairs (days)
7.1 6.9 7.8 10.7 14.6  9 8.9
10 % of non-emergency repairs
completed right first time 90.2% 88.1% 82.6% 85.1% 85%  89.1% 88.3%
11
How many times in the
reporting year did you not
meet your statutory
obligations to complete a gas
safety check within 12
months of a gas appliance
being fitted or its last check.
3 3 17 1417 142  
2016
total 
3028
total
12 % Satisfaction with repairs
service 98.3% 92.5% 90.8% 92.0% 95%  87.2% 88%
13
% of tenants satisfied with
the landlord's contribution to
the management of the
neighbourhood they live in
83.2% 83.2% 84.5% 84.5% 87%  81.5% 85.1%
14 % of tenancy offers refused 37.7% 46.4% 40.2% 24.1% 39.6%  38.3% 32.9%
15
% of anti-social behaviour
cases reported in the last
year which were resolved.
95.0% 96.0% 99.4% 99.8% 99.7%  94% 94.7%
16  % of new tenancies
sustained – Overall 88.5% 88.5% 88.5% 92% 92.2%  91.1% 90.8%
Existing Tenants 91.2% 94.2% 95.4% 95.5% 93.51  94.6 94.2%
Homeless Tenants 84.6% 82.1% 80.4% 88.4% 89.39  90.2 90.2%
Housing List 89.3% 90.0% 91.7% 92.8% 94.5  90.3 89.9%
17 % of Lettable Houses that
became vacant in last year 9.2% 9.7% 9.5% 6.6% 8.3%  7.6% 7.8%
18
% of rent due lost through
properties being empty
during the last year 
1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.58% 2%  1.51% 1.4%
19 No of Households currently
waiting for adaptations  New indicator 46 129 107 
3121
total 5090

Page 7

INDICATOR
Renfrewshire Council S H N
(1)
S H R
(2)
17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 DOT 21/22 21/22
20
Total Cost of adaptations
completed in the year by
source of funding 
New indicator 402,000 £86,152 £608,555 
£16.1m
total
£37.1m
total
21 Average time to complete
approved adaptations (days)  33.6 56.8 36.2 79.4 142  52.1 54.4
22
% of court actions initiated
which resulted in eviction - all
reasons
25.0% 27.4% 20% 0 0.8%  0.04 21.8%
24
Homelessness - % of
homeless households
referred to RSLs under
section 5 and through other
referral routes
New indicator 26.3% 32.1% 32%  26.7% 27.42
25 % tenants who feel rent
represents value for money 75.8% 75.8% 78.2% 78.2% 83.4%  81.2% 82.5%
26 Rent collected as % of total
rent due in the reporting year 101.2% 100.0% 99.5% 99% 98.2%  98.7 99.3%
27
Gross rent arrears (all
tenants) as at 31st March
each year as a % of rent due
for the reporting year 
4.9% 5.8% 5.7% 6.4% 7.99%  8.2% 6.3%
28 Average annual management
fee per factored property £90 £90 £108 £0 £57.70  £112.59 £104.67
29 Owners satisfied with
factoring service 56.7% 61.0% 60.8% 62.4% 60.4%  51.6% 65.4%
30
Average length of time taken
to re-let properties in the last
year (days) 
38.2 38.5 45 85.7 66  55.5 51.6
31 Gypsies/travellers - Average
weekly rent per pitch  
N/A no sites in Renfrewshire      
32
% of gypsies/travellers
satisfied with the landlord's
management of the site    
*Last year we initially reported an SHQS figure of 91.7%.  We resubmitted our SHQS return when the SHR 
advised that if a property has an EESSH failure it cannot be SHQS compliant.  After we resubmitted our data, 
the revised figure for percentage of properties meeting SHQS was 80.1% 
Source: (1) Scottish Housing Network website (LAs) (2) Scottish Housing Regulator Website (LAs &
RSLs) 
Link to Tenant Satisfaction Survey
https://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/Tenants

Page 8

__________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of the Report 
1. Financial – None 
2. HR & Organisational Development - None 
3. Community/Council Planning 
Building strong, safe, and resilient communities – Improving and maintaining
neighbourhoods and homes.
Working together to improve outcomes – Increasing resident satisfaction
with neighbourhoods and communities 
4. Legal –None 
 
5. Property/Assets – None 
6. Information Technology – None 
7. Equality & Human Rights – 
 
The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in
relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts
on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights
have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in the
report because it is for noting only.   If required following implementation, the
actual impact of the recommendations and the mitigating actions will be
reviewed and monitored, and the results of the assessment will be published
on the Council’s website 
8. Health & Safety – None 
9. Procurement – None 
10. Risks –   None 
11. Privacy Impact – None 
12. COSLA Policy Position – N/A 
13. Climate Risk – None
___________________________________________________________________

Page 9

Background Papers 
 Report to the Communities, Housing and Planning Policy Board on 26
October 2021, ‘Annual Housing Performance Benchmarking Report 2020/21’. 
The foregoing background papers will be retained within Communities, Housing and
Planning Services for inspection by the public for the prescribed period of four years
from the date of the meeting.   
The contact officer within the service is Ray Walkinshaw, Housing Regeneration and
Development Manager, Communities & Housing,
ray.walkinshaw@renfrewshire.gov.uk 
___________________________________________________________________

Page 10

Prepared by: Prepared for: 
Research Resource  Renfrewshire Council 
Contact: Lorna Shaw Contact: Paul McLean
Tel: 0141 641 6410
E-mail: Lorna.shaw@researchresource.co.uk
Tel:  0141 618 6264
E-mail:  paul.mclean@renfrewshire.gov.uk 
 
Renfrewshire Council
Tenant Satisfaction Survey
May 2022
Appendix 1

Page 11

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Research Resource was commissioned by Renfrewshire Council to undertake their
2022 Tenant Satisfaction Survey. The aim of the research was to seek tenants’ views
on the services that Renfrewshire Council provides as a landlord, how well it performs
these services and to help identify areas where the service can be improved. 
A total of 1,316 interviews were carried out with tenants using a telephone
methodology. 1,316 interviews provides data accurate to +2.54% (based upon a
50% estimate at the 95% confidence interval). Interviews were spread across all
areas of Renfrewshire Council’s stock. 
KEY FINDINGS
The key findings of Renfrewshire Council’s 2022 Tenant Satisfaction Survey are as
follows:
OVERALL SATISFACTION
 The majority of respondents (82%) were very or fairly satisfied with the overall
service provided by Renfrewshire Council as a landlord. 
MOVING INTO YOUR HOME
 Just under three quarters (73%) of the tenants who had moved into their
current home within the last five years were very or fairly satisfied with the
condition of their home when they moved in.
 All respondents were then asked if they were happy with the type of house
they currently have. The majority of respondents stated yes (87%).
 More than 8 in 10 respondents felt they had about the right number of rooms
in their home (85%). 
COMMUNICATION AND PARTICIPATION
 Just over 9 in 10 tenants (91%) felt their landlord was very or fairly good at
keeping them informed about their services and decisions.
 Over 6 in 10 tenants (62%) stated they use the internet. Tenants were most
likely to access the internet using a smartphone (52%), followed by a tablet
(31%) and a home computer (16%).
 All respondents were asked if they would be interested in using ‘My Account’,
the Council’s online customer account which allows access to Council
services online 24 hours a day. Just over half of tenants (53%) stated they
were already registered and a further 15% said they would be interested in
using ‘My Account’.

Page 12

 The majority of tenants would prefer to use the telephone to get in touch with
their landlord (94%), this was also the method tenants prefer their landlord to
use when they need to get in touch with them (88%).  
 Tenants were most likely to say they would prefer to be consulted by
telephone call (71%), letter (62%) or magazines, newsletters or People’s News
(32%). 
 Almost all respondents (99%) were very or fairly satisfied with the opportunities
given to them to participate in their landlord’s decision-making processes. 
CONTACT WITH HOUSING SERVICES
 Just under 6 in 10 respondents (56%) had been in contact with the Council
about a housing or housing related matter in the last 12 months with a query
other than to pay their rent. 
 The majority of tenants who had contacted the Council did so by telephone
(92%).
 Just under 9 in 10 tenants (89%) were either very or fairly satisfied with the
contact they had with the Council during the pandemic, compared to 5%
who were very or fairly dissatisfied and 6% who were neither satisfied nor
dissatisfied.
 Tenants were most likely to say they were in contact about repairs (69%). 
 Of tenants who had contact with the Council within the last 12 months:
o 80% said it was easy to get hold of the right person,
o 84% found staff to be helpful,
o 68% said their query was answered or issue was resolved within a
reasonable time,
COMPLAINTS
 1 in 20 respondents (5%) stated they had complained to Housing Services in
the last 12 months. The majority of complaints were regarding repairs (44%) or
anti-social neighbours (29%).
 Satisfaction with service-based complaints was mixed, ranging from 29%
regarding how well tenants were kept informed about the progress of their
complaint to 74% with regards to how easy it was to make their complaint.
One third of respondents (33%) who made a service-based complaint were
very or fairly satisfied with the way their complaint was handled by the
Council.
 Satisfaction with anti-social complaints was also mixed, ranging from 26% with
regards to the speed with which the complaint was dealt with to 74% with
regards to how easy it was to make the complaint. Just under 4 in 10 tenants
(37%) who made an anti-social complaint were very or fairly satisfied with the
way their complaint was handled by the Council.
REPAIRS

Page 13

 All respondents were asked generally, how satisfied they are with the way
Renfrewshire Council as their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance.
The majority of respondents (83%) were very or fairly satisfied in this respect.
 Just under 4 in 10 respondents (38%) stated they had repairs carried out in
their property within the last 12 months.
 Respondents who had had a repair carried out in their property within the last
12 months were then asked if they were satisfied or dissatisfied with various
aspects of the repairs service. Satisfaction was high, ranging from 81% with
regards to the repair being done ‘right first time’ to 94% with regards to
keeping dirt and mess to a minimum. 
 The majority of tenants (79%) who had a repair carried out in the last 12
months said the worker or tradesperson showed proof of their identity.
 With regards to appointments, 97% of respondents stated they were offered a
suitable appointment time for their repair, with almost all (96%) stating the
appointment was kept.
YOUR HOME
 The majority of tenants (80%) were very or fairly satisfied with the quality of
their home.
 1 in 20 respondents (5%) stated that they had major improvements carried out
over the last two years. The most common major improvements were new
bathrooms (2%).
 The majority of tenants (83%) who have had major improvements carried out
in their home within the last two years were very or fairly satisfied with the
quality of work.
 Tenants were then asked if they were satisfied or dissatisfied with various
aspects of their home.  Satisfaction was high, ranging from 77% with regards
to gutters and drains to 93% with regards to the wiring. 
NEIGHBOURHOOD MANAGEMENT 
 Tenants were asked to rate how satisfied or dissatisfied they were with their
landlord’s contribution to the management of the neighbourhood they live in.
87% of tenants were very or fairly satisfied in this respect.
 Tenants were most likely to say the best thing about their neighbourhood is
that it is quiet and peaceful (46%) followed by there being good neighbours
and friendly people (41%).
 More than half of tenants (58%) did not believe there were any problems or
issues in their neighbourhood. Where tenants did believe an issue to be
present, this was most likely in relation to anti-social behaviour/ anti-social
neighbours (16%). 
RENT AND BENEFITS
 Just over 8 in 10 tenants (83%) were of the opinion their rent represents very or
fairly good value for money.

Page 14

 Just over half of respondents (51%) stated that they were in receipt of full
housing benefit, 4% in receipt of partial housing benefit, 21% in receipt of
Universal Credit, 24% said they did not receive any housing benefit and 1%
were unsure. 
 The majority of respondents (99%) stated that they did not require any help
with maintaining rent payments.
 More than 1 in 10 respondents (14%) said they have spoken to Renfrewshire
Council Housing staff about money advice. Of these respondents, 84% found
the advice and assistance very or slightly helpful.