Democracy Spraffa

Community Funding Update

Renfrewshire Council · 29 October 2024
Back to Communities and Housing Policy Board — 29 October 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

___________________________________________________________________
To:  Communities and Housing Policy Board
On:  29th October 2024
___________________________________________________________________
Report by: Chief Executive
___________________________________________________________________
Heading: Community Funding Update
___________________________________________________________________    
1. Summary 
1.1 As agreed previously by the board, the Policy and Partnerships service now
prepares and submits a paper for consideration each cycle in relation to
Council led community funding available for allocation through the
Greenspaces, Villages Investment and Sustainable Communities Fund(s). 
This paper represents the most recent update for members in relation to these
funds. 
1.2 Whilst the Greenspaces and Villages Investment Fund are well established,
elected members will be aware that the Sustainable Communities Fund was
launched in early October 2023.  The response in relation to the Sustainable
Communities Fund continues to be very positive with a strong pipeline of
applications under development.   
1.3 An officer panel reviews all applications for the Sustainable Communities
Fund and makes recommendations on funding awards to members of the
Communities and Housing Board.   The panel met in September and October
to consider applications received through the fifth funding round which closed
on 31st August 2024.

Page 2

1.4 Section 4 of the report provides an overview of the Sustainable Communities
Fund and sets out recommendations for consideration by the board in relation
to this funding round.  Three applications are recommended for approval, and
seven applications are recommended to be deferred at this time to allow for
further information gathering and engagement on applications with the
community organisations concerned. Eight applications are not recommended
for funding, as these were not assessed as meeting the funding criteria by the
officer panel.  Two applications have been withdrawn following submissions
during previous funding rounds. 
1.5 Full detail on all applications and related recommendations relating to the
Sustainable Communities Fund is provided in Appendix 1 of this report. 
1.6 Members are asked to note that where projects are not recommended for
award, this does not reflect the quality and value of these projects and
associated organisations at a local level, and officers will work with wider
partners to signpost to other appropriate funding mechanisms. 
1.7 Section 5 of this report sets out recommendations in relation to Villages
Investment funding. 
1.8 The Sustainable Communities Fund has been very popular since its launch
and has attracted a significant number of applications. As the Fund has now
been in operation for one year, it is recommended that a formal review of the
guidance is carried out. This review will provide an opportunity to reflect
learning points from the first year of operation and clarify guidance to support
applicants as well as officers applying guidance when developing
recommendations. It is further recommended that a review of Villages
Investment Fund guidance and operation is carried out simultaneously, to
ensure alignment of both funds and their processes. 
1.9 Recognising there are several applications currently in the process of being
assessed for the fund, it is recommended that both funds are paused for new
applicants at this time to allow the review to be completed. 
1.10 Section 6 of this report details the context and arrangements for the review of
guidance and operation for both funds. Full details on the review of the
operation and guidance of the Sustainable Communities Fund will be reported
to the next Communities and Housing Board on 14th January 2025.

Page 3

2.  Recommendations 
2.1  It is recommended that members of the Board:
 Approve the funding recommendations detailed in Section 4 and
Appendix 1 of this report in relation to the proposed allocation of the
Sustainable Communities Fund
 Note the Villages Investment Fund update detailed in Section 5, with
one recent award highlighted under delegated authority arrangements
previously agreed.
 Note the planned review of the Sustainable Communities Fund and
Villages Investment Fund guidance and processes.
 Agree to pause both the Sustainable Communities Fund and Village
Investment Fund to new applications pending the revision of guidance
for the funds. 
3.  Background 
3.1 To strengthen monitoring and oversight of funding recommendations made in
relation to a number of specific Council funding streams, the Policy and
Partnerships service now submits a community funding paper to each cycle of
the Communities and Housing Board.  This includes recommendations from
officers in relation to funding awards through the Greenspaces Fund, Villages
Investment Fund and the Sustainable Communities Fund.   
4. Sustainable Communities Fund 
4.1 In March 2023, Council agreed to combine the remaining monies from the
Community Empowerment Fund and Climate Change Action Fund to create a
single Sustainable Communities Fund. This was further boosted by £650,000
from the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, Communities and Place for the support
and improvement of community assets and infrastructure.  £1.5m is available
as funding to support projects and organisations through this Fund. 
4.2 On 20th September 2023, Leadership Board approved the key objectives and
criteria of the fund and agreed that recommendations in relation to funding
applications would be submitted to the Communities and Housing Board for
final approval, following assessment by a cross service officer panel.

Page 4

4.3 The Sustainable Communities Fund utilises a tiered funding model to reflect
different-sized community projects as well as the varying levels of support
required at different stages of development. A tiered approach helps to ensure
ease of access to a proportionate application process to enable a range of
initiatives that align with community empowerment:  
 Small - awards up to £10K: capital and revenue funding to develop local
projects and initiatives which are targeted at enabling community
participation and promoting community collaboration and which build
resilience within our communities. This level would be targeted at groups
where a small amount of money can make a significant difference to
enabling community participation.  
 Intermediate – awards of £10K to £25K: capital and revenue funding to
develop projects or organisations with a focus on improving community
infrastructure and/or community wellbeing and which have the potential to
be replicated in other areas; and  
 Large – awards up to £100K: larger capital grants with the aim of
supporting communities that aspire to take ownership or develop land or
buildings in local communities.  
4.4 The UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF), which makes up part of the
Sustainable Communities Fund, comprises a clear split between capital and
revenue funding with set amounts allocated over financial years 2023-24 and
2024-25.   UKSPF will be allocated to approved projects which meet the
criteria and to maximise drawdown within each financial year. 
4.5 The Fund officially opened to applications on 10 October 2023, and the most
recent funding round closed on 31st August 2024.   A cross service officer
panel met on two occasions in September and October 2024 to assess new
applications against the funding guidance and criteria.  The Panel also held
follow up discussions on all deferred applications at that time.    
4.6 In summary the panel recommends that:
 3 applications be recommended for award 
 7 applications be deferred to gather further information and to allow for
further engagement to be undertaken
 8 applications are not recommended for funding awards as these were
assessed as not meeting the criteria of this particular funding stream.

Page 5

Applications recommended for approval 
4.7 Three applications have been submitted which are recommended for
approval, as detailed below: 
 Loud n Proud (£80,000) 
Loud n Proud have applied for £80,000 for a project to create
soundproof rooms within The Kerr Building, as part of a wider vision to
create a Community Music Hub within this space. 
Loud n Proud are a registered youth music charity based in Paisley.
They provide opportunities for young people to learn to play musical
instruments and in addition to providing music tuition, have a track
record for using music to help support and enhance the lives of people
in need. 
The Kerr Building (formerly Woodside House) was gifted to Loud n
Proud in 2022, with a condition that the building is used for the good of
the people of Paisley and at the same time giving Loud n Proud a
permanent home. Loud n Proud has used this opportunity to create a
community music hub providing a progression route into the music
industry for young people in Renfrewshire.  The project represents a
fourth phase of capital works carried out to date, including making good
following extensive fire damage, creation of three business incubator
spaces (now leased by three independent music production
companies), and interior building works to create four music tuition
studios and one workshop space. 
The project will provide 5 soundproof rooms that would enable the
organisation to cater for group and ensemble music, recording music,
loud instruments such as brass, bag pipes and drums. This will
increase the range and amount of opportunities for local people to take
part in music. 
A key outcome of this project is that Loud n Proud would be in a
stronger financial position to become more self-sufficient and less
reliable on short-term funding, as they would be in a position to
generate more income from their activities.

Page 6

The total cost of this project is estimated to be £99,710. The group
have secured £13,500 of external funding from a range of different
sources. The group have engaged with a range of Council services
including economic development, planning etc as part of the
development of their business plan.  Funding of £20,000 was
previously allocated from CODF to support organisational
development, with a range of small awards made through Local
Partnerships and Celebrating Renfrewshire to deliver specific targeted
activities. 
 Thorn Athletic Community Trust (£24,840) 
Thorn Athletic are well-established, grassroots football, multi-sport and
community wellbeing club in West Johnstone. Thorn deliver football
training sessions, fitness groups, weight management and healthy
activity groups for different age/gender/interest groups including
organised team sports from pre-school to pensioner groups (550+
active members). The organisation works to support people across the
community to become more active and healthier, resilient and able,
doing more for themselves, their families and community. 
As the organisation continues to grow it has consulted with local people
and the community, and has recognised the need to develop a formal
business plan which sets out what will be delivered going forward, what
investment can be progressed in infrastructure and identifies future
funding opportunities to support these developments. 
Funding is being sought through the Sustainable Communities Fund to
appoint consultants to work with the organisation, who would develop a
business plan, undertake an options appraisal exercise and deliver a
feasibility study/report to RIBA Stage 1, on how to create the most
appropriate facilities and projects to meet local needs. 
 Your Community Your Space (£20,000) 
Your Community, Your Space is a recently constituted Paisley-based
organisation that aims to improve the well-being and quality of life for
individuals and communities locally. 
The organisation intend to progress a community asset transfer
application in relation to Beechwood Community Centre and have
identified that in order to develop the Centre as a viable community
asset, they intend to engage with a business planning consultant to co-
produce a business development strategy for the Centre.

Page 7

This will include a deliverable plan to realise income generation
potential for the Centre and an Energy Audit. 
Deferred applications 
4.8 Seven applications were submitted where further information requires to be
gathered and evaluated before officers are able to make recommendations on
these applications to the Board.  To allow for further work to be carried out
with groups relating to their proposals, it is recommended that applications are
deferred as follows: 
 Friends of Barshaw Park 
 Houston Old School Trust 
 Houston Community Council 
 Finding Your Feet 
 Life Church
 Renfrew Cricket Club 
 Sculpture House Collective 
4.9 As mentioned in Section 1 of this report, applicants are strongly advised to
engage with co-ordinating officers as early as possible in the application
development process. 
Applications not recommended for award 
4.10 Finally, following assessment by the officer panel, the following applications
are not recommended for a funding award, as they do not meet the criteria of
the fund:    
 Caledonia Bowling Club 
 Feis Phaislig 
 Paisley Model Yacht Club 
 Studio FV 
 Afghan Scottish Families Association 
 Renfrew Development Trust 
 St Mirren Charitable Foundation 
 Lochwinnoch Community Development Trust 
4.11 Members are asked to note that where projects are not recommended for
award, this does not reflect the quality and value of these projects and
associated organisations at a local level, and officers will work with wider
partners to signpost to other appropriate funding mechanisms. 
4.12 More detailed information in relation to each application is provided in
Appendix 1.

Page 8

Overview of funding 
4.13    The residual balance of available funding within the Sustainable Communities
Fund is £205,964 of revenue funding, and £514,635 of capital funding. This
includes the contribution from the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, but does not
include the recommendations detailed within this paper. 
4.14 Subject to the approval of recommendations as set out in Appendix 1,
£124,840 would be allocated to successful projects through Round 5 of the
fund (£80,000 Capital, £44,840 Revenue). 
5. Villages Investment Fund 
5.1        Since the last update to board in August 2024, one Villages Investment Fund
project has been funded under the Delegated Approval process.    
Community Group  Project  Sum Awarded 
Langbank Bowling Club  Rendering Repair to Perimeter
Wall 
£3,500 
5.2 Langbank Bowling Club operate and maintain their asset which is part of a
larger community facility.  The entire site is divided internally, offering a
community operated and accessible multi-use games area, as well as the
private members bowling green. 
5.3 The site has historically operated as a private tennis and bowling club for over
100 years.  Records show it was gifted to the community of Langbank in the
1980’s.  Renfrewshire Council do not have any part in the maintenance or
operation of either facility. 
5.4 Bowling Club members, as well as passers-by, contacted the Club concerned
with the condition of the deteriorating exterior boundary wall, which separates
the Green from the public, council adopted footpath.  Left untreated this
deterioration could impact the wall’s structure and safety, potentially requiring
a significant spend to repair over time. 
5.5 Following the approval of the above, £160,799 of Villages Investment Funding
is remaining for future allocation.

Page 9

6. Proposed Review of funding guidance 
6.1 The Policy and Partnerships service now reports several funding streams in a
single community funding paper in order to strengthen monitoring and
oversight of funding recommendations. This has been supported by the
establishment and development of a cross-service officer panel which
provides corporate oversight of grant applications in advance of making
recommendations for elected members to consider. 
6.2 As part of the development of the Connected Communities service, further
work will be undertaken by officers to consider the Council’s grant funding and
investment as part of its commitment to supporting a strong local community
sector. This work will consider how the Council can best support local
community organisations, making sure the Council maximises the impact of its
investment for local people, and improving clarity and consistency for the local
voluntary and community groups who seek to work with the Council. 
6.3 The Sustainable Communities Fund has been very popular since its launch
and has attracted a significant number of applications. As the Fund has now
been in operation for one year, it is recommended that a formal review of the
guidance is carried out. This review will provide an opportunity to reflect
learning points from the first year of operation, and clarify guidance to support
applicants as well as officers applying guidance when developing
recommendations.  This will be critical to ensuring that the remaining funding
can be targeted to ensure maximum benefit for all local groups and
organisations. 
6.4 It is also suggested that officers also take the opportunity at this time to review
guidance for the Villages Investment Fund, to ensure that guidance of both
funding streams is closely aligned, with funding routes for applicants more
clearly defined. As part of this review, consideration will also be given to how
these two funds interact with other funding sources, such as Local Partnership
funding, and consider how to best support organisations to navigate the local
funding landscape. 
6.5 The reviews will focus on the guidance and operation of funds, and will not
review or seek to recommend any changes to allocated budgets or funding
levels for either fund. 
6.6 Recognising there are several applications currently in the process of being
assessed for both funds, it is recommended that both funds are paused for
new applicants at this time to allow the review to be completed. Officers will
continue to work with all deferred applicants to progress information and
proposals proactively over the coming months during this pause.

Page 10

6.7 Full details on the review of the operation and guidance of both the
Sustainable Communities Fund and Villages Investment Fund will be reported
in the next Board cycle in early 2025. It is anticipated that the funds will be
reopened to new applicants as soon as practicable following the approval of
any updated guidance. 
Implications of the Report
1. Financial – This paper recommends the allocation of £124,840 of funding
from the Sustainable Communities Fund (£80,000 capital funding, £44,840
Revenue).  The paper also reports the allocation of a further £3,500 from the
Villages Investment Fund under delegated authority. 
2. HR & Organisational Development – none. 
3. Community/Council Planning – the Fund set out in the paper supports
engagement and collaboration with local communities on a range of activities
which align with the new Council Plan 2022-2027; Our Renfrewshire
Community Plan and/or Renfrewshire’s Plan for Net Zero.   
4. Legal - none. 
5. Property/Assets – there are a number of applicants to this fund seeking to
pursue community asset transfers, and where there are relevant property or
asset issues these are covered as part of discussions at the officer panel. 
6. Information Technology – none. 
7. Equality and Human Rights – the Recommendations included within this
report are considered to have a positive impact on equality and human rights.
The fund continues to attract applicants seeking to make community assets
more accessible for communities, for example in this round there are
recommended awards to support disabled access and facilities in community
venues, dedicated projects for older people, as well as a number of projects
seeking to address poverty and socio-economic disadvantage faced within
some local communities. 
8. Health and Safety – none. 
9.  Procurement – none. 
10. Risk – none. 
11.  Privacy Impact – none. 
12. Climate Risk – the Sustainable Communities Fund aligns with the themes
within Renfrewshire’s Plan for Net Zero and the delivery of relevant projects
will assist the local response to the climate emergency.

Page 11

13.        Childrens Rights – while there are no specific children’s rights implications
associated with the recommendations for this round Sustainable Communities
Fund, there are applications in the pipeline which seek to widen opportunities
for children and young people to actively participate within their communities. 
15. COSLA Policy Position – none. 
Appendix 1: Summary of applications with Officers recommendations
___________________________________________________________________ 
List of Background Papers:
Sustainable Communities Fund Guidance 
Author:   Laura McIntyre, Head of Policy and Partnerships

Page 12

Appendix 1 – Sustainable Communities Fund   
APPLICATIONS RECOMMENDED FOR AWARD 
Name of
organisation 
Project description  Tier  Grant
Application
Amount 
Recommended
Award
Comments 
Loud n Proud The purpose of the project is to
create a community music hub,
incorporating 5 soundproof rooms
that would cater for group and
ensemble music, recording music,
loud instruments such as brass, bag
pipes and drums. This will increase
the range and number of
opportunities for local people to
take part in music and it will increase
revenue generation opportunities
(which are used to cover free music
classes for young people) to make
the organisation more sustainable.
Large £80,000 £80,000 The total cost of the project is £99,700,
and approximately £15,000 has been
secured from other external funders.
Loud and Proud operate from the Kerr
Building following a fire at their
previous premises.  Their current
premises have been gifted by the
owner. 
The group provide a range of free
activities for local people and it is
intended that the revenue generating
opportunities from the new facilities
can support the ongoing financial
sustainability of wider provision. 
Thorn
Athletic
Community
Trust
Funding is sought to create a
business plan, options appraisal and
feasibility to RIBA 1 on how to create
Intermediate £24,840 £24,840,
subject to
receipt of three
quotes
The organisation has provided a single
quotation for this work, and as such
this award remains subject to the
receipt of three quotes.

Page 13

the most appropriate facilities and
projects to meet local needs. 
Your
Community
Your Space 
To develop the Beechwood
Community Centre as a viable
community asset, YCYS will engage
with a business planning consultant
to co-produce a business
development strategy for the Centre.
This will include a deliverable plan to
realise income generation potential
for the Centre and an Energy Audit. 
Intermediate £23,045 £20,000,
subject to
receipt of three
quotes
The organisation has provided a single
quotation for this work, and as such
this award remains subject to the
receipt of three quotes. 
The award is recommended to be
capped at £20,000 rather than the full
requested amount, to remove the
inflationary contingencies line within
the proposed project budget. 
DEFERRED APPLICATIONS
Name of
organisation 
Project description  Tier  Grant
Application
Amount 
Recommended
Award
Comments 
Houston
Community
Council
The project will deliver a Local Place
Plan for the area covered by Houston
Community Council.
Intermediate £23,500 N/A Recommendation to defer to allow for
further engagement and clarification
on the application.
Friends of
Barshaw Park
The group have requested support
from the Fund for a range of capital
works as well as a project manager
and contingency to maintain
structural support of the wall and
bring buildings back into use as
workshops and venues for activities.
Large £80,000 N/A Note application deferred from
previous round.
Recommendation to defer to allow for
further engagement and clarification
on the application.
Finding Your
Feet (FYF)
Further to a Business Energy
Scotland (BES) energy audit, funding
is sought to work alongside a
Small £6,534.00  N/A Recommendation to defer to allow for
further engagement and clarification
on the application.

Page 14

contractor to identify key actions to
be undertaken and cost up a
programme of work and engage
potential contractors. The audit
outlined a range of recommendation
to lower running costs/reduce the
carbon emissions of the FYF Charity
Hub in central Paisley.
Houston Old
School Trust
Replacement of one of the Centre's
gas central heating boilers. This
boiler provides the heating for four
of the rooms available for let and the
hot water for the Kitchen.
Small £4,000 N/A Note application deferred from
previous round. 
Recommendation to defer to allow for
further engagement and clarification
on the application.
Life Church The Lighthouse Project aims to
transform the 1929-30 Henry Wilson
Art Deco building at Paisley Cross,
Paisley, Scotland, into a vibrant
community hub featuring a café and
public worship space. 
This initiative seeks to create a new
home for the Church, preserving the
architectural heritage of this iconic
structure while addressing
community needs such as
socialisation, poverty alleviation,
and addiction support.
Large £100,000 N/A Recommendation to defer to allow for
further engagement and clarification
on the application.

Page 15

Renfrew
Cricket Club
The purpose of the project is to
enhance the security and safety of
the cricket club's grounds by
installing 3-meter high fencing
around the perimeter.
Large £57,298.20 N/A Recommendation to defer to allow for
further engagement and clarification
on the application.
Sculpture
House
Collective 
The purpose of the project is
threefold. 1: To provide a more
environmentally sustainable home
for the organisation. Upgrading the
energy efficiency of the building by
installing insulation and replacing
sub-standard and failing windows,
enhancing the quality of the spaces
within and reducing the carbon
footprint. 2: To improve social
sustainability by creating a new,
community-accessible ceramic
facility from two smaller existing
spaces. Ceramic activities are in high
demand from partners, and this
work will provide more capacity and
better facilities for existing and
projected programmes. 3. To
strengthen financial sustainability,
ensuring the organisation’s long-
term presence as a key cultural
organisation in Ferguslie Park. The
proposals will reduce energy
overheads by around £3,000 (or
Large £93,417.60 N/A Recommendation to defer to allow for
further engagement and clarification
on the application.

Page 16

3200kg of CO2) annually. A new
ceramic facility will enable us to
generate additional income via paid-
for evening classes and increased
public commissions.
APPLICATIONS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR AWARD
Name of
organisation 
Project description  Tier  Grant
Application
Amount 
Recommended
award
Comments 
Caledonia
Bowling Club
The purpose of the project is to
improve the Club's internal and
external facilities to provide a safe
and inclusive environment for
members (playing & social), wider
community groups and visitors. 
Small £10,000 No award Note application deferred from
previous round. The application did
not meet the core funding criteria, as
a member-based organisation it was
felt the application did not
sufficiently demonstrate wider
community benefit.
Fèis Phàislig The purpose of the project is to
upgrade instrumental equipment to
ensure high-quality learning
experiences.
Small £10,000 No award Note application deferred from
previous round. The application did
not meet the core funding criteria, as
a member-based organisation it was
felt the application did not
sufficiently demonstrate wider
community benefit.

Page 17

Paisley Model
Yacht Club
The project is requesting funds to
procure a suitable stairway in wood
or steel and its installation in the
Clubhouse.
Small £2,000 No award Note application deferred from
previous round. The application did
not meet the core funding criteria, as
a member-based organisation it was
felt the application did not
sufficiently demonstrate wider
community benefit.
Studio FV The purpose of the project is to
deliver film production services and
workshop training in the use of the
mobile community cinema kit (which
they are caretakers of) to 3
organisations in Renfrewshire
delivering social activities to people
facing isolation and health
inequalities.
Intermediate £23,485 No award Note application deferred from
previous round. The application did
not meet the core funding criteria, as
a member-based organisation it was
felt the application did not
sufficiently demonstrate wider
community benefit.
Afghan
Scottish
Families
Association 
The purpose of the project is to
integrate newly arrived Afghan
Families in the society, well-being
programs, bring them out from
anxiety and depression, English
Language supporting classes, bring
the families together by contacting
and celebrating their culture events.
Small £10,000 No award The application did not meet the core
funding criteria as it focused on
recurring revenue costs with no
identified plan for sustainability. 
The group is working with Engage on
an alternative application and officers
have made contact with the group to
link to other local services and
partnership opportunities. 
Renfrew
Development
Trust
The organisation wants to acquire an
unused, falling into disrepair
building and develop into a
Intermediate  £23,200 No awards The application did not meet the core
funding criteria as it focused on

Page 18

multipurpose, community designed
hub. 
recurring revenue costs with no
identified plan for sustainability.
Lochwinnoch
Community
Development
Trust 
This project is to save Lochwinnoch’s
category A listed octagonally
designed parish church. It was built
in 1806 and subsequently extended
and closed to the public in March
2020. Since then, it has suffered from
water damage and all ongoing
repairs were suspended. The
organisation will purchase the
church and the attached halls from
the Church of Scotland, and
sensitively repair and adapt it.
Large £100,000 N/A The applicant has already received an
award from the large tier of this fund
for an alternative project, which is
being progressed. 
St. Mirren FC
Charitable
Foundation 
The project will provide a health and
wellbeing hub for the deprived
community of Ferguslie Park in
Paisley as well as a stand-alone base
for charity staff - to: 
 deliver activities from 
Large £100,000 N/A This application did not demonstrate
sufficient wider community benefit. It
was not considered that a base for
staff was in line with the guidance for
this fund.

Page 19

 reduce operating costs and
become more sustainable and self-
sufficient 
The area is under the away stand,
used to be a community area but has
been left for a long time and in a
state of disrepair. They offer a range
of services to the community and
being within the Club gives service
users anonymity for programmes
that require this. They need a space
that is functional on a daily basis and
also accommodate a lot of people,
e.g. 60 for Alzheimer’s Scotland.  
WITHDRAWN APPLICATIONS
Name of
organisation 
Name of organisation  Name of
organisation 
Name of
organisation 
Recommended
Award
Name of organisation 
Langbank
Bowling Club
The purpose of the project is to
sustain Langbank Bowling Club by
restoring the main brick retaining
wall between the raised bowling
green and Langbank Main Road.
Small £3,500 N/a The Panel were supportive of
elements of this project but noted that
the project as a whole could be
supported through Villages
Investment Funding.
Ralston Out
of School
Care
The purpose of the project is to
identify if the building of a purpose
build family centre is needed and
possible in the area between Ralston
Primary School and the Ralston
Community sports football pitches.  
Small  £8,500 N/a Options have been discussed with
ROSC who are keen to pursue an
alternative CAT proposal and wish to
withdraw their SCF application at this
time.

Page 20

No embedded text on this page.