Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 - Consultation on Packaging Appearance and Display
Renfrewshire Council · 18 August 2026
Back to Communities and Housing Policy Board — 18 August 2026 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
PUBLIC ___________________________________________________________________ To: Communities and Housing Policy Board On: 18 August 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Report by: Director of Environment, Housing & Infrastructure ___________________________________________________________________ Heading: Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 - Consultation on Packaging, Appearance and Display ___________________________________________________________________ 1. Summary 1.1 The Department of Health & Social Care (DHSC) are seeking views on a number of proposed regulatory controls, which the UK Government and devolved administrations are jointly considering, to tackle smoking, and youth vaping. 1.2 The consultation follows the implementation of the Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026 (The Act); which ratified the Four Nations’ shared intent to create the first “smoke free” generation into UK Law. The Act both updates existing controls, and future proofs existing legislation in relation to new and innovative products, such as herbal smoking products. This provides a framework for consistent controls across the UK, with the addition of regulation-making powers for the devolved Nations, to allow for a co-ordinated response to the risks and harms of tobacco use. 1.3 This consultation outlines proposed restrictions to the packaging, appearance and retail display of tobacco, vaping, nicotine and nicotine-adjacent products which - once finalised - will be implemented under these regulation-making powers. Restrictions posed are similar to those already in place for tobacco, which are designed to reduce visibility and appeal – particularly to children and young persons. In particular, the consultation suggests the following: • “Plain” packaging requirements for all such products – limited by packaging size, font size and colour (pantone 448C- drab dark brown), • Restrictions on flavouring, including the description of same, • Display restrictions for products other than tobacco (which is already controlled), such as cigarette papers and vaping products, • Design restrictions on products, such as in relation to colours, branding or novel appearance.
Page 2
PUBLIC 1.4 The relevant enforcement authority for the retail and manufacture aspects of the Act is the local weights & measures authority (Trading Standards), and any proposed changes by Regulation would likely confer additional statutory duties on same. Renfrewshire Council’s Scheme of Delegated Functions is being updated, accordingly. 1.5 While the proposals align with public health objectives, they will significantly increase enforcement responsibilities for local authority Trading Standards services for a number of years, through Officer training, business support and engagement, and increased inspection and enforcement activity alongside competing priorities. Sufficient and sustainable funding will be key to the success of these restrictions, as this demand cannot be met from current budget and staffing levels. 1.6 The final date for submissions to the consultation is 2 October 2026. Renfrewshire Council are supportive of the proposals to restrict the packaging, appearance and retails display of these products; however have concerns relating to the additional duties this will place on Services. The proposed response is attached as Appendix 1. ___________________________________________________________________ 2. Recommendations It is recommended that the Communities and Housing Policy Board: 2.1 Agrees the consultation responses at Appendix 1. 2.2 Authorises the Director of Environment, Housing and Infrastructure to submit the response prior to the closing date of 2 October 2026. ___________________________________________________________________ 3. Background 3.1 Nicotine products are legal products for adult use in the UK. Smoking tobacco however, is stated to be the single-most preventable cause of ill- health, disability, and death in the UK, being responsible for around 80,000 deaths per year. All tobacco products are harmful, being classified as type- one carcinogens, and there is no safe level of tobacco consumption. No other consumer product has the potential to cause premature death for up to two- thirds of its users, when used as intended. In 2024, the Office for National Statistics reported that 5.3 million people in the UK were active smokers. This represented 10.6% of the UK population overall, and 12% of the population in Scotland. 3.2 While existing legislative controls have reduced the uptake of tobacco use in younger persons, the use of alternative nicotine delivery systems such as Nicotine Vapour Products (NVPs, e-cigarettes or “vapes”) has grown at a concerning rate.
Page 3
PUBLIC 3.3 In Renfrewshire, there are around 315 businesses currently registered for the sale of tobacco, or NVPs, or both. Businesses must register with Scottish Government to sell these products, and compliance with this requirement - along with other regulatory controls - is enforced by officers in Trading Standards. 3.4 Implemented in late April 2026, the Tobacco & Vapes Act 2026 provides a framework for consistent controls across the UK, with the addition of regulation-making powers for the devolved Nations to further restrict the packaging, appearance and retail display of tobacco, vaping, nicotine and nicotine-adjacent products. From 1 January 2027, the Act ensures that people born on or after 1 January 2009 will never legally be able to be sold tobacco products. In effect, this raises the smoking age by a year, every year, until this restriction applies to the whole population. The Act also closes a legislative gap by providing that non-nicotine vapes, and nicotine pouches, are now age- restricted for sale to age 18, from 29 October 2026. 3.5 Evidence indicates that vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking in the short to medium term, as vaping products do not contain tobacco and do not produce carbon monoxide. Consequently, users are exposed to substantially lower levels of harmful substances than those associated with tobacco products. There is also established evidence that vaping can support smoking cessation among adult smokers, particularly when used alongside behavioural support programmes. Vaping however, is not without risk and the longer-term health impacts are still not known. As such, the current public health position remains that adult smokers should consider cessation by switching to vaping as a less harmful alternative, whilst people who do not smoke should not take up vaping. The consultation proposals are therefore intended to strike a balance between supporting adult smokers to quit, and reducing the appeal of vaping products to children and young people. 3.6 The extensive suite of restrictions outlined in the consultation are designed to reduce the attractiveness and appeal of these products by means of restricting colours, branding, product design and retail display options in line with existing controls on tobacco products in the UK. 3.7 Officers are broadly supportive of the proposals in the consultation which support stated public health objectives and present a real opportunity to discourage youth vaping. It should be noted however, that the ongoing changes in this sector pose a significant duty on both business and on Trading Standards services. 3.8 Retailers and regulators will need to work together through any implementation schedule, to understand and apply the changes. Retailers, wholesalers and distributors will be required to adapt to new packaging and display requirements. Financial implications for businesses will include product replacement and stock management costs, changes to point of sale displays and staff training requirements. Trading Standards services will require to engage with businesses to ensure understanding of requirements, ensure implementation through retail monitoring, complaint investigation and enforcement where required to ensure sectoral compliance. Effective, clear guidance and realistic implementation timescales will therefore be important.
Page 4
PUBLIC Implications of the Report 1. Financial – None. 2. HR & Organisational Development – None. 3. Community/Council Planning – • Our Renfrewshire is thriving – regulation of this sector will ensure that retailers maintain high standards, are effectively regulated and will reduce the negative impacts on legitimate businesses from non-compliant retailers. • Our Renfrewshire is well – the proposal for a smokefree future will reduce preventable deaths in Renfrewshire by around 650 per year. There will also be a significant reduction in demand for associated health services. • Creating a sustainable Renfrewshire for all to enjoy – there may be environmental benefits through the reduction of tobacco and vaping- related litter, packaging waste and discarded vaping devices. 4. Legal –The Scheme of Delegated Functions requires to be updated to include the Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026. 5. Property/Assets – None. 6. Information Technology – None. 7. Equality & Human Rights – (a) The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in the report. If required following implementation, the actual impact of the recommendations and the mitigating actions will be reviewed and monitored, and the results of the assessment will be published on the Council’s website. 8. Health & Safety – None. 9. Procurement – None. 10. Risk – None. 11. Privacy Impact – None.
Page 5
PUBLIC 12. Climate Risk – While the primary purpose of the consultation is to improve public health outcomes, there may be secondary environmental benefits through the reduction of tobacco and vaping-related litter, packaging waste and discarded vaping devices. The proposals are not expected to have a significant impact on the Council's strategic climate change risks or net zero objectives but may contribute indirectly to wider sustainability and environmental quality outcomes. 13. Children’s Rights - The proposal for a smoke free future will limit and ultimately prevent children from ever being legally permitted to purchase tobacco products which will have a positive impact on the future health of future generations. Restrictions on Nicotine Vapour Products will reduce their appeal to children and therefore discourage them from making use of these products. 14. COSLA Policy Position – N/A. List of Background Papers (a) Background Papers – Report to Communities & Housing Policy Board on 16 January 2024 titled Creating a smokefree generation and tackling youth vaping – a consultation by the Department of Health & Social Care ___________________________________________________________________ Author: Faye Wilson, Lead Officer (Trading Standards) Email: faye.wilson@renfrewshire.gov.uk
Page 6
PUBLIC APPENDIX 1 Consultation response – Tobacco and Vapes: Packaging, Appearance and Display 1. Tobacco packaging 1.1 Proposals for further plain packaging requirements Q1.1A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce the plain packaging requirements outlined above for all tobacco products? This does not include cigarettes and hand-rolling tobacco which already have strict plain packaging requirements. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Plain packaging requirements have acknowledged effects on appeal for existing tobacco products. These requirements are in place for tobacco products in many countries worldwide, and in some places go further than UK requirements. Q1.1B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce the plain packaging requirements outlined above for heated tobacco devices? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. While representing a relatively small proportion of existing used product, standardisation across all tobacco products makes sense to future proof regulatory provisions. Q1.1C - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce the plain packaging requirements outlined above for herbal smoking products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Products which form a “gateway” to the uptake of any nicotine product should be considered accordingly. Q1.1D - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce the plain packaging requirements outlined above for cigarette papers? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. These requirements are in place for tobacco products in many countries worldwide, so global manufacturing burden should be lessened.
Page 7
PUBLIC 1.2 Text health warnings on the packaging of heated tobacco devices and cigarette papers Q1.2A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce text health warnings on the packaging of heated tobacco devices? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. While representing a relatively small proportion of existing used product, standardisation across all tobacco products makes sense to future proof regulatory provisions. Q1.2B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce text health warnings on the packaging of cigarette papers? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Standardisation across all tobacco products makes sense to enforce health messaging. 1.3 Picture health warnings on the packaging of more products and devices Q1.3A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce picture health warnings on the packaging of all tobacco products? This builds on requirements that are already in place for most tobacco products. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Standardisation across all tobacco products will enforce health messaging. Q1.3B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce picture health warnings on the packaging of heated tobacco devices? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Despite forming a relatively small proportion of existing used product, standardisation across all tobacco products will enforce health messaging. Q1.3C - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce picture health warnings on the packaging of herbal smoking products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal in principle and note that picture health warnings may need to reflect the direct risks of each product to be meaningful, and that these health risks may not yet be known. As a gateway product however, consideration of standardisation across all sectoral products will enforce health messaging.
Page 8
PUBLIC Q1.3D - Do you agree or disagree that picture health warnings should not be required on the packaging of cigarette papers? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Renfrewshire Council do not propose including picture health warnings on cigarette papers due to the small size of the packaging. 1.4 Pack inserts in packaging for all tobacco and herbal smoking products and heated tobacco devices Q1.4A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce pack inserts for all tobacco products? This does not include cigarettes and hand-rolling tobacco which we are addressing separately to this consultation. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. It is noted that evidence has been gathered to suggest that pack inserts can have a positive effect on tobacco cessation. This supports the move towards a smoke- free UK. Q1.4B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce pack inserts for heated tobacco devices? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. While representing a small proportion of used product, it makes sense to standardise messaging across all tobacco use products to reinforce health and cessation messaging. Q1.4C - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce pack inserts for herbal smoking products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. As a gateway product, consideration of standardisation across all sectoral products will enforce health messaging. Q1.4D - Do you agree or disagree that pack inserts should not be required in the packaging of cigarette papers? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Renfrewshire Council do not propose including pack inserts for cigarette papers due to the small size of the packaging.
Page 9
PUBLIC 1.5 Time allowed to implement new packaging requirements Q1.5A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposed implementation period of no less than 12 months (from when the detail of any new requirements is clear)? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. The shortest possible timeline should be sought for all requirements; however it is understood that a shorter timescale is impractical. 2. Heated tobacco device appearance 2.1 Restricting the colour and finish of heated tobacco devices Q2.1A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the colour of heated tobacco devices to Pantone 448C (drab dark brown) with an opaque matt finish? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Plain packaging requirements have acknowledged effects on appeal for existing tobacco products. The pantone is known to be unappealing, and requiring the devices themselves to be this colour is likely to discourage use. Consistency of pantone with existing tobacco products reinforces the messaging of tobacco being harmful, and discouraged. Q2.1B - Do you agree or disagree that heated tobacco devices should be banned from having cosmetic lights? This will not apply to functional lights, like those that indicate charge level. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Any aspects of “novelty” should be removed to make these products less appealing. 2.2 Restricting branding, imagery and artwork on heated tobacco devices Q2.2A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict all branding, imagery and artwork on heated tobacco devices? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Any aspects of “novelty” on devices should be restricted to make these products less appealing.
Page 10
PUBLIC 2.3 Restricting digital screens on heated tobacco devices Q2.3A - Do you agree or disagree that digital screens on heated tobacco devices should be restricted to only the display of safety and status information such as battery level, and be greyscale in colour (black, white and grey only)? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This is forward-looking and ensures that device displays cannot be used for novelty appeal. 2.4 Stopping heated tobacco devices imitating other products Q2.4A - Do you agree or disagree that heated tobacco devices should not be permitted to mimic the design of other products and items? The objective of this proposal is to limit the appeal or attractiveness of heated tobacco devices. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. As an example, existing variations on design of vaping products has increased the appeal for many users, but particularly children. Items found locally include fidget spinner designs, or designs mimicking popular drinks brands. 2.5 Time allowed to implement new device requirements Q2.5A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposed implementation period of no less than 12 months (from when the detail of any new requirements is clear)? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. The shortest possible timeline should be sought for all requirements; however it is understood that a shorter timescale is impractical. 3. Vaping and nicotine product packaging and flavour descriptors Definition of vaping products Throughout this section, we refer to ‘vaping products’. This includes vapes, as well as other vape components and refill containers sold separately from the device. 3.1 Restricting the colour on packaging for all vaping and nicotine products Q3.1A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the colour of packaging of all vaping products to white? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Plain packaging is likely to reduce both appeal and uptake. Restricting the colour of packaging to white ensures the products are seen as less harmful than tobacco, so their use as a cessation device in particular is not discouraged.
Page 11
PUBLIC Q3.1B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the colour of packaging of all nicotine products to white? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Consistency of colour with vaping products ensures the products are seen as less harmful than tobacco, so their use in cessation is not discouraged. 3.2 Restricting imagery, branding, text and other promotional features Q3.2A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce the restrictions to imagery, branding, text and promotional features outlined above for the packaging of all vaping products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Plain packaging is likely to reduce both appeal and uptake. Standardisation removes any route for variation between product which could form a type of branding. Renfrewshire Council would support exemption for a basic outline of the product inside, for product compatibility selection purposes. Q3.2B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce the restrictions to imagery, branding, text and promotional features outlined above for the packaging of all nicotine products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Plain packaging is likely to reduce both appeal and uptake of these products. Renfrewshire Council would support exemption for a basic outline of the product inside, for product selection purposes. 3.3 Restricting the shape, materials and safety features of packaging for all vaping and nicotine products Q3.3A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that packaging for all vaping products should have uniform shapes, and that there should be restrictions on materials and finishes that can enhance appeal? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Plain packaging removes any route for variation between product which could enhance appeal. Q3.3B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that packaging for all nicotine products should have uniform shapes, and that there should be restrictions on materials and finishes that can enhance appeal? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Plain packaging removes any route for variation between product which could enhance appeal.
Page 12
PUBLIC Q3.3C - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that packaging for all vaping products should be both child-resistant and tamper-evident? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This restriction would be an important product safety improvement, and reinforces the messaging that these products are not for children. Q3.3D - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that packaging for all nicotine products should be both child-resistant and tamper-evident? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This restriction would be an important product safety improvement, as small levels of nicotine can be highly toxic to children. 3.4 Restricting flavour descriptions on vaping and nicotine products packaging Single lead flavour Q3.4A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict flavour descriptors on the packaging of all vaping products to a single lead flavour? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal and notes that this can reduce child appeal, without discouraging adult use for cessation. Q3.4B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict flavour descriptors on the packaging of all nicotine products to a single lead flavour? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal and notes that this can reduce child appeal, without discouraging adult use for cessation. Concept, sensory, food and drink categories Q3.4C - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that concept and sensory flavour descriptors should be restricted on the packaging of all vaping products? Renfrewshire Council agree with this proposal and notes that this can reduce child appeal, without discouraging adult use for cessation. Q3.4D - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that concept and sensory flavour descriptors should be restricted on the packaging of all nicotine products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal and notes that this can reduce child appeal, without discouraging adult use for cessation.
Page 13
PUBLIC Q3.4E - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that confectionery, sweets, dessert and cake name descriptors should be restricted on the packaging of all vaping products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal and notes that this can reduce child appeal, without discouraging adult use for cessation. Q3.4F - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that confectionery, sweets, dessert and cake name descriptors should be restricted on the packaging of all nicotine products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal and notes that this can reduce child appeal, without discouraging adult use for cessation. Q3.4G - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that alcohol and drink name descriptors should be restricted on the packaging of all vaping products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal and notes that this can reduce child appeal, without discouraging adult use for cessation. Q3.4H - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that alcohol and drink name descriptors should be restricted on the packaging of all nicotine products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal and notes that this can reduce child appeal, without discouraging adult use for cessation. 3.5 Product information on and inside vaping and nicotine products packaging Q3.5A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to require the consumer information listed above on and inside the packaging of all vaping products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. The product information outlined will support consumer choice, alongside health warnings. Mandating specific requirements for nicotine strength, age restriction and waste disposal guidance will help to ensure products are being treated correctly throughout their lifecycle. Q3.5B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to require the consumer information listed above on and inside the packaging of all nicotine products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. The product information outlined will support consumer choice, alongside health warnings. Mandating specific requirements – in particular around age restriction which is a new requirement for many nicotine products (e.g. pouches) will ensure products are being treated correctly throughout their lifecycle.
Page 14
PUBLIC 3.6 Time allowed to implement new packaging requirements Q3.6A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposed implementation period of no less than 12 months (from when the detail of any new requirements is clear)? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. The shortest possible timeline should be sought for all requirements; however it is understood that a shorter timescale is likely to be impractical. 4. Vape device appearance 4.1 Restricting the colour and finish of vapes Q4.1A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to limit the colour of a vaping device (including all visible parts) to white, black or grey with a matt finish? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Restricting the colour of the body of devices to opaque, neutral colours (black, grey, white) with a matte finish removes appeal for children and young persons. Q4.1B - Do you agree or disagree that vape devices should be banned from having cosmetic lights? This would not apply to functional lights, such as those that indicate charge level. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Any aspects of “novelty” should be removed to make these products less appealing. 4.2 Restricting branding, imagery, and artwork on vapes Q4.2A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict all branding, imagery and artwork on vapes? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Any aspects of “novelty” on the device itself should be removed to make these products less appealing.
Page 15
PUBLIC 4.3 Restricting the digital screens on vapes Q4.3A - Do you agree or disagree that digital screens on vapes should be restricted to only the display of safety and status information such as battery level, and be greyscale in colour (black, white and grey only)? This would not include lights that indicate status information, such as when the device is being recharged. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Any permissible variation on a standardised product can be exploited for branding purposes. As such, any aspects of “novelty” should be removed or restricted to make these products less appealing. 4.4 Stopping vapes imitating other products Q4.4A - Do you agree or disagree that vapes should not be permitted to mimic the design of other products and items? The objective of this proposal is to limit the appeal or attractiveness of vapes. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. Existing variations on design of vaping products has increased the appeal for many users, but particularly children. Examples found locally include fidget spinner designs, or designs mimicking popular drinks brands. 4.5 Time allowed to implement new device requirements Q4.5A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposed implementation period of no less than 12 months (from when the detail of any new requirements is clear)? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. The shortest possible timeline should be sought for all requirements; however it is understood that a shorter timescale is likely to be impractical. 5. Retail display 5.1 Requested temporary and incidental displays in England, Wales and Northern Ireland Not applicable to Scotland 5.2 Restricting the retail display of cigarette papers, heated and other tobacco- related devices and herbal smoking products in England, Wales and Northern Ireland Not applicable to Scotland.
Page 16
PUBLIC 5.3 Retail display of prices for cigarette papers, heated and other tobacco- related devices and herbal smoking products in England, Wales and Northern Ireland Not applicable to Scotland. 5.4 Exemptions to display restrictions for tobacco products, cigarette papers, tobacco-related devices and herbal smoking products in England, Wales and Northern Ireland Not applicable to Scotland. 5.5 Display exemptions for trade premises Not applicable to Scotland. 5.6 Display exemptions for specialist tobacconists Not applicable to Scotland. 5.7 Display exemptions for bulk tobacconists Not applicable to Scotland. 5.8 Retail display of tobacco products, smoking-related products, heated tobacco devices and herbal smoking products in Scotland Tobacco products and smoking-related products Q5.8A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to introduce a legal requirement that the requested temporary display of tobacco products and smoking-related products must take place from behind a sales counter? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal ensures incidental display to other persons is minimised as far as possible. Heated tobacco devices and herbal smoking products Q5.8B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the display of heated tobacco devices? This would include the requirement that their requested temporary display must take place from behind a sales counter. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal ensures any display to other persons is minimised as far as possible.
Page 17
PUBLIC Q5.8C - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the display of herbal smoking products? This would include the requirement that their requested temporary display must take place from behind a sales counter. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal ensures any display to other persons is minimised as far as possible. Q5.8D - Do you agree or disagree that the maximum visible area of display unit permitted as a result of a requested or incidental display of herbal smoking products or heated tobacco devices in Scotland should be 0.1 square metres? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal ensures any display to other persons is minimised as far as possible, in line with restrictions on other tobacco products. Waterpipes Q5.8E - If we expand the area of display, what size do you think it should be increased to? 0.5 square metres. This allows for a reasonable increase in requested/incidental display size. These products are normally supplied in shisha cafes or online, so the risk of children or young persons seeing such a display is minimal. Smoking-related products Q5.8F - Do you agree or disagree that the current list of smoking-related products reflects all tobacco-related devices used for smoking currently available to purchase? Renfrewshire Council agrees that this definition reflects all legal smoking-related products available for purchase. 5.9 Display of prices for heated tobacco devices and herbal smoking products in Scotland Q5.9A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the display of prices of heated tobacco devices? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal brings pricing requirements into line with other tobacco products. Retailers are used to these provisions for cigarettes and hand-rolling tobacco, and the legislation allows for a choice of 3 pricing formats. This proposal ensures any opportunity for display or branding is minimised as far as possible, in line with restrictions on other tobacco products.
Page 18
PUBLIC Q5.9B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the display of prices for herbal smoking products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal brings these products into line with other smoking products, and ensures opportunities for display or branding are minimised as far as possible, in line with restrictions on tobacco products. 5.10 Exemptions to display regulations for tobacco products, smoking-related products, heated tobacco devices and herbal smoking products in Scotland Display exemptions for trade premises Q5.10A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to allow for the display of heated tobacco devices and prices in relevant trade premises in Scotland? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal brings these products into line with other smoking products. Q5.10B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to allow for the display of herbal smoking products and prices in relevant trade premises in Scotland? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal brings these products into line with other smoking products. 5.11 Display exemptions for specialist tobacconists Q5.11A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to allow for the display of heated tobacco devices and prices in specialist tobacconists in Scotland? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal brings these products into line with other smoking products. Q5.11B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to allow for the display of herbal smoking products and prices inside specialist tobacconists in Scotland? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal brings these products into line with other smoking products. 5.12 Display exemptions for bulk tobacconists Q5.12A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to remove and not replicate the bulk tobacconist exemption for all products in scope of this consultation? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal
Page 19
PUBLIC Definition of vaping products Throughout this section, we refer to ‘vaping products’. This includes vapes, as well as other vape components and refill containers sold separately from the device. 5.13 Restricting the display of vaping and nicotine products across the UK Q5.13A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the display of vaping products? This would include the requirement that their requested temporary display must take place from behind a sales counter. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal ensures incidental display to other persons is minimised as far as possible. Q5.13B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the display of nicotine products? This would include the requirement that their requested temporary display must take place from behind a sales counter. Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. The proposal to restrict the display of other nicotine products such as “pouches” ensures incidental display to other persons is minimised as far as possible. Q5.13C - Do you agree or disagree that the requested temporary or incidental display of vaping and nicotine products should not result in the display of tobacco products (and smoking-related products in Scotland), cigarette papers, heated and other tobacco devices or herbal smoking products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. 5.14 Display of prices of vaping and nicotine products across the UK Q5.14A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the display of prices for vaping products, and allow for additional information on nicotine strength and ingredients? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal ensures consistency across all defined tobacco, nicotine and non- nicotine products. Permitting nicotine strength and ingredients of these products allows for consumer choice, and previous proposals around packaging will see that this information is freely available to traders wishing to include these. Specifying that price lists for tobacco products and vaping products must be separate reflects the level of harm/risk.
Page 20
PUBLIC Q5.14B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to restrict the display of prices for nicotine products and allow for additional information on nicotine strength and ingredients? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal ensures consistency across all defined tobacco, nicotine and non- nicotine products including “pouches” and similar. 5.15 Exemptions to display restrictions of vaping and nicotine products across the UK Q5.15A - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to allow for the display of vaping products in relevant trade premises? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal brings these products into line with other related products. Q5.15B - Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to allow for the display of nicotine products in relevant trade premises? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. This proposal brings these products into line with other related products. 5.16 Exemptions to display restrictions for vaping and nicotine products in pharmacies in England, Wales and Scotland Q5.16A - Do you agree or disagree that community pharmacies in England, Wales and Scotland should be permitted an exemption to allow for the limited display of vaping and nicotine products? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. The setting helps to reiterate that these products are a cessation or medical device, rather than a recreational product. 5.17 Time allowed to implement all new display restrictions Q5.17A - Do you agree with our proposal that there should be a minimum of 6 months’ notice (from when the detail if any new requirements is clear)? Renfrewshire Council agrees with this proposal. The shortest possible timeline should be sought for all requirements. While it’s appreciated that a tight timescale on display restrictions may mean some retailers require to use temporary methods to conceal these products, this allows the manufacturing sector to catch up while providing public health benefits as soon as possible. A shorter timescale is likely to be impractical for both retail and for regulators.