Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board - 26/09/2023

Renfrewshire Council · 26 September 2023
Back to Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board — 26 September 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

Notice of Meeting and Agenda
Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board 
Date Time  Venue
Tuesday, 26 September
2023
15:00 Council Chambers (Renfrewshire),
Council Headquarters, Renfrewshire
House, Cotton Street, Paisley, PA1 1AN 
MARK CONAGHAN
Head of Corporate Governance 
Membership 
Councillor Andy Doig (Convener):     Councillor Kevin Montgomery (Depute Convener):    
Councillor Jennifer Adam:  Councillor Chris Gilmour:  Councillor John Gray:  Councillor
Lisa-Marie Hughes:  Councillor Robert Innes:  Councillor James MacLaren:  Councillor
Janis McDonald:   
Further Information 
This is a meeting which is open to members of the public. 
A copy of the agenda and reports for this meeting will be available for inspection prior
to the meeting at the Customer Service Centre, Renfrewshire House, Cotton Street,
Paisley and online
at http://renfrewshire.cmis.uk.com/renfrewshire/CouncilandBoards.aspx
For further information, please email
democratic-services@renfrewshire.gov.uk 
Hybrid Meeting 
Please note that this meeting is scheduled to be held in the Council
Chambers.  However, it is a hybrid meeting and arrangements have been made for
members to join the meeting remotely should they wish.

Page 2

Webcasting of Meeting 
This meeting will be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet
site – at the start of the meeting the Convener will confirm if all or part of the meeting
is being filmed.  To find the webcast please navigate to 
https://renfrewshire.public-i.tv/core/portal/home 
Members of the Press and Public 
Members of the press and public wishing to attend the meeting should report to the
customer service centre where they will be met and directed to the meeting.

Page 3

Apologies 
Apologies from members. 
Declarations of Interest and Transparency Statements 
Members are asked to declare an interest or make a
transparency statement in any item(s) on the agenda and to
provide a brief explanation of the nature of the interest or the
transparency statement. 
MONITORING & REVIEWING SERVICE DELIVERY PERFORMANCE
POLICIES AND PRACTICE 
1 Risk Update Report 
Report by Director of Finance & Resources. 
1 - 6 
ANNUAL PROGRAMME 
2 Charges for Bulk Items Uplift for the Elderly - Lead
Officer John Kilpatrick 
Report by Lead Officer. 
7 - 12

Page 4

No embedded text on this page.

Page 5

___________________________________________________________________
To: Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board
On: 26 September 2023
___________________________________________________________________
Report by: Director of Finance and Resources
___________________________________________________________________
Heading: Risk Update Report
___________________________________________________________________
1. Summary
1.1 Each year the Board considers and approves the Council’s risks.
1.2 The Board would usually receive risk reports in May and November each year. The
purpose of this risk paper is to update the Board on actions outlined in the response
to recommendations of the Dargavel Primary School independent review as agreed
by Council in June 2023.
1.3 Appendix 1 details a new risk that is being added to the corporate risk register to
ensure that the independent review recommendation in relation to risk management
and related actions are monitored.
________________________________________________________________________________ 
2. Recommendations
2.1 It is recommended that the Board notes the content of the report.
_________________________________________________________
3. Background
3.1 The recent external review into Dargavel included a number of recommendations
for the Council to consider. The first 4 recommendations related to the delivery of
the education solution for Dargavel specifically and the other recommendations
focused on organisational learning, with two of those recommendations focused on
corporate working and risk management. 
3.2 Recommendation 6 of the External Review stated: 
“The Council needs to review how it both identifies risk and manages it.” 
Item 1
Page 1 of 12

Page 6

3.4 Concerning recommendation 6, the Chief Executive noted that the handling of risk
in relation to the Dargavel Village development is not representative of the council’s
current practice in managing large scale projects or those which potentially involve
commercial risk.  There are well-established risk management approaches
deployed and supported by project and risk management specialists as well as
multi-disciplinary teams, and external support and expertise is utilised where this is
appropriate. These approaches are well-established in centrally managed projects
and programmes. 
3.4 As previously reported to the Board, the council has robust arrangements in place
for managing corporate, strategic, and business-as-usual risks, and there is a clear
governance framework in place with 6-monthly reporting to the Audit, Risk and
Scrutiny Board, having delegated authority for risk management matters.  However,
in order to make best use of the learning from the Review, officers are progressing
a number of actions that would further strengthen our approach. The key actions
being (or indeed already) progressed include: 
• a belt and braces review of risk profiles across all service departments to ensure
visibility of all risks and confirmation of where certain risks are being monitored if
outwith the standard Risk Reports to the Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board (i.e.,
Health and Safety Planning Groups, Service Improvement Plans etc)
• a review of the ‘service risk rep’ roles in each service department to ensure the
reps who sit on the Corporate Risk Management Group are sufficiently involved
in risk matters within the service, to feed this into the Corporate Risk
Management Group and that they also have authority within the service to
provide challenge as a ‘critical friend’ 
• exploring more sophisticated risk modelling for major capital projects 
• delivery of a project risk management workshop specific to the planned new
primary school in Dargavel
• delivery of project risk management training with all PMU colleagues (in a train
the trainer format) so colleagues are delivering this as part of project kick-offs to
support a more risk focussed culture in the organisation
• undertaking a ‘healthcheck’ of project management arrangements across the
council to ensure governance, management, reporting and risk management is
appropriate to the scale of the project
• an update to the risk management course on iLearn and consideration of
whether it should be a mandatory course (on a one-off basis at least) 
• embedding risk management training into the new leadership development
programme that is currently under development, particularly in relation to
commercial risk
• reviewing governance documents to ensure delegations in relation to liability
caps are clear and unambiguous 
3.5 All of the above activity is embedded in the new risk shown in Appendix 1, along
with details of the officers taking forward the action and the planned timescales for
delivery of the actions. 
__________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 12

Page 7

Implications of the Report
1. Financial 
Recurring costs associated with the measures in place for the risk are considered
proportionate to the level of risk, and new planned actions are also considered to be
cost effective. 
The financial requirements to support the risk should be met within the budget of
each relevant risk owner, nevertheless, any unplanned and unbudgeted cost
pressures that arise in relation to any of the risks identified will be subject to review
in consultation with the Director of Finance and Resources. 
2. HR & Organisational Development – not relevant to report recommendations 
3. Community/Council Planning – effective risk management supports the delivery
of all community/ council plan outcomes 
4. Legal – not relevant to report recommendations 
5. Property/Assets – not relevant to report recommendations 
6. Information Technology – not relevant to report recommendations 
7. Equality & Human Rights – not relevant to report recommendations 
8. Health & Safety – not relevant to report recommendations 
9. Procurement – not relevant to report recommendations 
10. Risk – as per the subject matter of this report 
11. Privacy Impact – not relevant to report recommendations 
12. Cosla Policy Position – not relevant to report recommendations 
13. Climate Risk – not relevant to report recommendations
_________________________________________________________
Author:           Karen Locke, Risk Manager 
Tel: 07506 957 037, Email: Karen.Locke@renfrewshire.gov.uk 
Page 3 of 12

Page 8

Appendix 1: New corporate risk: Organisational learning from Dargavel Review 
Context Risk Statement Owned by Current Controls Likelihood Impact Evaluation
CODE TBC
Organisational learning from Dargavel Review
The council must progress the
improvements as a matter of
urgency or there is a risk that
without sufficient learning,
similar errors to those made in
the past could occur again, with
further financial implications
and significant reputational
damage for the council.
CMT (1) Corporate leads identified to
ensure recommendations are
taken forward.
(2) Board reporting to ensure scrutiny
of progress
02 05 10
High
The recent External Review into Dargavel, and the
council’s response, highlighted several areas for
improvement. The first 4 recommendations related to
the delivery of the solution for Dargavel specifically
and the others were as follows:
▪ Recommendation 5 - Corporate working and
organisational culture
▪ Recommendation 6 - Risk management
▪ Recommendation 7 - Role of members
▪ Recommendation 8 - Public confidence
Action Codes Actions Assigned To Date Status
Response to Rec 6 “It is proposed to undertake a programme of review of current risk management processes supporting major
projects and deliver a programme of development across the Council’s senior officer cohort in relation to
identifying, managing and mitigating project risk, with a particular emphasis on commercial risk when
contracting with external third parties as part of major projects and procurement exercises. It is expected that
this programme of review and training will be progressed over the course of 2023.”   
Escalation of programme/ project management (governance) risk from risk assurance model to corporate risk
register until improved governance explored and implemented for projects
Risk Manager 31-Aug-2023 
Create two new risks on the corporate risk register. One for delivery of the Dargavel 2 solution and one for
our organisational learning from the Dargavel investigation
Risk Manager 31-Aug-2023 
Deliver a project risk management workshop specific to the new primary school at Dargavel Risk Manager 31-Aug-2023 
Share project risk management training with all PMU colleagues (train the trainer) so they are delivering this
as part of project kick-offs to support a more risk focussed culture in the organisation
Risk Manager 30-Sep-2023 
Explore more sophisticated risk modelling for major capital projects CMT 31-Oct-2023 
All services to undertake a belt and braces review of risk profiles to ensure visibility of risks and confirmation
of where certain risks are being monitored if outwith the standard Risk Report (i.e., Health and Safety
Planning Groups, Service Improvement Plans)
All Directors, individually 31-Oct-2023 
All service Directors to review ‘service risk rep’ roles to ensure their reps (on the Corporate Risk Management
Group) are sufficiently involved in risk matters within the service, to feed this into the Corporate Risk
All Directors, individually 31-Oct-2023 
Page 4 of 12

Page 9

Management Group and that they also have authority within the service to provide challenge as a ‘critical
friend’ 
Undertake a healthcheck of project management arrangements across the council to ensure governance,
management, reporting and risk management is appropriate to the scale of the project 
PMU Manager 30 Nov 2023 
Revisit and update risk management course on iLearn and explore if it should be mandatory (on a one-off
basis)
Risk Manager 30-Nov-2023 
Linked to recommendation 5, arrange a risk management development day/ half day for CMT and Heads of
Service:
• Project risk management (and risk simulation exercise)
• Risk horizon scanning and sustainability (the Global Risk Report)
• Liability caps and their implications
PMU Manager, Risk
Manager,
Managing Solicitor (Projects)
31-Dec-2023 
Review of governance documents to ensure it is explicit re delegations for liability caps  Head of Governance 31-Dec-2023 
Review of Standing Orders for Contracts in respect of liability caps Head of Finance and
Procurement
31-Dec-2023 
Page 5 of 12

Page 10

Page 6 of 12

Page 11

To: Audit, Risk & Scrutiny Board
On: 26 September 2023 
Report by:  Lead Officer
Heading:  Charges for Bulk Items Uplift for the Elderly 
1. Summary
1.1. At its meeting on 22 August 2022, members of the Audit, Risk and Scrutiny
Board agreed an annual programme of activity for the Board for 2022/23. This
included a review of charges for bulk items uplifts for the elderly as part of the
programme of activity. 
2. Recommendations
The Board is asked to:
2.1. Note the progress contained within the report. 
3. Background
3.1. Residents of Renfrewshire can request special uplifts if they need any bulky
general waste collected from their home. This can be for between 1 and 20
items but cannot include hazardous, clinical, or toxic waste. Loose waste must
be bagged or tied in manageable bundles where necessary. In addition,
appliances such as washing machines, freezers, cookers etc are all charged
individually and cannot form part of the 1 to 20 items.
3.2. Ground clearances are when residents have more than 20 items and the charge
quoted is for a maximum of one hour’s work. However, if officers visit and
assess that it will take longer than this, they will contact the resident about the
additional costs before commencing any work. Again, domestic appliances are
charged individually and do not form part of a ground clearance.
3.3. Renfrewshire Council aims to collect item(s) as soon as possible within 14 days.
Residents must ensure any white goods have their doors removed or place in
Item 2
Page 7 of 12

Page 12

a position where no one can access it. Special uplift requests for white goods
and general goods can be made at the same time, however white goods are
charged separately.
3.4. The charges for 2023/24 are £37.15 for a domestic uplift (1-20 items) and
£37.15 for each domestic white good. The ground clearance charges are
£88.00 covering a driver, a waste collector, and a vehicle, for a maximum of
one hour’s work. 
3.5. Residents who are council tenants are entitled to two special uplifts per year as
part of their rent charge, this is paid for from within the overall Housing Revenue
Account (HRA). This is achieved by providing their rent reference number when
making their booking.
3.6. The current scheme provides no free, discounted or exemptions for this service
for any other residents.
3.7. The board approved, the age of 65 to be assumed in relation to the term elderly
for the duration of this review where this is practical. If an exception to this age
is used, it will be clearly noted within the review. 
4. Purpose of the Review
4.1. The key purpose of this review is to:
1. Set out the current position in relation to bulk uplifts within Renfrewshire
Council;
2. Consider the impact of offering a free bulk uplift service for the elderly; and
3. Identify any other mitigations that could be recommended for the elderly
that the council could pursue within available resources. 
5. Scope of the Review and Timescales
5.1. In relation to 4.1(1) above, the focus of the review is on research into
demographics within Renfrewshire; in particular, the elderly population and
current trends for existing service demand.
5.2. In relation to 4.1(2) above, the focus of the review is on assessing the financial
and non-financial implications in relation to the provision of free bulk uplifts for
the elderly.
5.3. In relation to 4.1(3) above, the focus on the review is exploring existing or
potential options available to the elderly within Renfrewshire through partner
organisations such as the third sector.
5.4. In relation to 4.1(3) above, consideration will be given to the existing services
provided within neighbouring local authorities in relation to free bulk uplifts for
the elderly to consider any benefits for Renfrewshire.
Page 8 of 12

Page 13

5.5. For clarity, the level of charges applied to bulk uplifts within Renfrewshire is
outwith the scope of this review.
5.6. The review has progressed through 2023, with a conclusive report being
submitted for approval to the Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board on 6 November
2023, and a final report to Council 14 December 2023. The table below provides
an outline of the proposed timetable.
Timetable for Bulk Uplift for the Elderly Review
Date of Board Meeting Stage of Review
23 January 2023 - Complete Commencement of review
18 March 2023 - Complete Continuation of review
22 May 2023 - Complete Continuation of review
26 September 2023 - Current Continuation of review
6 November 2023 - Revised Report to Board
14 December 2023 Final Report to Council  
6. Progress Update
6.1. The review has been progressing well and research has now been completed
across all areas within scope. This section will provide an update on the findings
since the 22 May 2023 report, with particular focus on the objectives within 5.3. 
6.2. In this report, we explore existing or potential options available to the elderly
through partner organisations such as the third sector within Renfrewshire; this
is in relation to scope objective 5.3.
6.2.1 The Council currently provides information regarding the potential to recycle
items of bulk uplift. As residents navigate through the special uplift request form
on the internet, information is provided on the RE-USE scheme.
6.2.2 Items in good condition can be donated free of charge to a re-use scheme.
Before arranging an, residents are asked to consider donating any items in
good condition to a re-use scheme, and the national helpline for more
information is listed as 0800 0665 820. 
Examples of items that re-use organisations will accept are:  
• Sofas and armchairs (fire regulation tags must be attached) 
• Beds and mattresses (fire regulation tags must be attached) 
• Wardrobes and chest of drawers 
• Dining furniture 
• Fridges, freezers, electric cookers, washing machines and tumble dryers 
• Bicycles 
Page 9 of 12

Page 14

6.2.3 The Zero Waste Scotland website allows residents to enter a postcode to find
a list of charitable organisations in the area that can be contacted to discuss re-
use options. This can be found at:
https://www.zerowastescotland.org.uk/resources/pass-items-through-reuse-
tool.
6.3. Care & Repair Renfrewshire deliver free services to people who are older or
have disabilities and live in Renfrewshire. This includes a minor repairs service;
however, it has been confirmed that removal of bulk uplift items is not one of
the services currently provided.
6.4.  The Scottish Welfare Fund is a discretionary scheme run by Local Government
and administered by each local authority, and aims to provide a safety net in
disaster or emergency, or to enable independent living in the community. The
fund should be available to people who do not have alternative means of paying
for what they need; however, bulk uplifts are not currently an eligible cost.
6.5.  There are five recycling centres across Renfrewshire where residents can
recycle, re-use and dispose of a wide range of household materials directly.
Residents must bring proof of residency in Renfrewshire, like a Council Tax bill
or driving licence, to all sites to gain access.
6.6. The next report to Board in November will provide a final summary of the overall
review and seek approval for its submission to full Council.
___________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of this report 
1.  Financial - The outcome of this review could result in additional costs and
loss of income to Renfrewshire Council. 
2.  HR and Organisational Development - None directly arising from this
report. 
3. Community/Council Planning - None directly arising from this report. 
4.  Legal - None directly arising from this report. 
5.  Property/Assets - None directly arising from this report. 
6.  Information Technology - None directly arising from this report. 
7.  Equality and Human Rights - The recommendations contained within this
report have not yet been assessed in relation to their impact on equalities
Page 10 of 12

Page 15

and human rights because the paper sets out the scope for a review process
rather than proposing any changes to services. Impact assessments will be
undertaken as part of the review, and the results of the assessment will be
published on the Council’s website. Any policy changes arising from the
review will also be fully assessed. 
8. Health and Safety - None directly arising from this report. 
9. Procurement - None directly arising from this report. 
10. Risk - The potential risk that the Council will overspend its approved budgets
for the year will be managed at a Council-wide level by the Chief Executive
and Directors. 
11. Privacy Impact - None directly arising from this report. 
12. 
13.
Cosla Policy Position - Not applicable. 
Climate Risk - None directly arising from this report.
__________________________________________________________________ 
List of Background Papers 
Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board Annual Programme approved 22 August 2022.
Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board Charges for Bulk Items Uplift for the Elderly 23 January
2023.
Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board Charges for Bulk Items Uplift for the Elderly 13 March
2023.
Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board Charges for Bulk Items Uplift for the Elderly 22 May
2023. 
The foregoing background papers will be retained within Finance and Resources for
inspection by the public for the prescribed period of four years from the date of the
meeting. The contact officer within the service is Finance Business Partner John
Kilpatrick who can be contacted at john.kilpatrick@renfrewshire.gov.uk  
__________________________________________________________________
Author: John Kilpatrick, Finance Business Partner 
Page 11 of 12

Page 16

Page 12 of 12