Democracy Spraffa

Minutes of meeting

Renfrewshire Council · 9 May 2024
Back to Council — 9 May 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Minute of Meeting
Council 
Date Time Venue
Thursday, 09 May 2024 09:30 Council Chambers (Renfrewshire), Council
Headquarters, Renfrewshire House, Cotton
Street, Paisley, PA1 1AN 
Present: Councillor Jennifer Adam, Councillor Fiona Airlie-Nicolson, Councillor Alison  Ann-
Dowling, Councillor Stephen Burns, Councillor Jacqueline Cameron, Provost Lorraine
Cameron, Councillor Michelle Campbell, Councillor Graeme Clark, Councillor Carolann
Davidson, Councillor Eddie Devine, Councillor Andy Doig, Councillor Audrey Doig, Councillor
Chris Gilmour, Councillor Edward Grady, Councillor Gillian Graham, Councillor Neill Graham,
Councillor John Gray, Councillor Anne Hannigan, Councillor John Hood, Councillor Lisa-
Marie Hughes, Councillor Robert Innes, Councillor Alec Leishman, Councillor Bruce
MacFarlane, Councillor James MacLaren, Councillor Kenny MacLaren, Councillor Mags
MacLaren, Councillor Colin McCulloch, Councillor Janis McDonald, Councillor Cathy
McEwan, Councillor David McGonigle, Councillor Jamie McGuire, Councillor Marie McGurk,
Councillor Iain McMillan, Councillor John McNaughtan, Councillor Kevin Montgomery,
Councillor Sam Mullin, Councillor Will Mylet, Councillor Iain Nicolson, Councillor Jim
Paterson, Councillor Emma Rodden, Councillor John Shaw, Councillor Ben Smith, Councillor
Andy Steel 
Chair
Provost L Cameron, Convener, presided. 
In Attendance
A Russell, Chief Executive; J O’Neill, Director of Children’s Services; G McNeil, Director of
Environment, Housing & Infrastructure; A MacArthur, Director of Finance & Resources; A
Morrison, Head of Economy & Development, L McIntyre, Head of Policy & Partnerships, L
Mahon, Head of Marketing & Communications, B Walker, Programme Director (City Deal &
Infrastructure) and L Adamson, Communications & Public Affairs Manager (all Chief
Executive’s); E Henry, Head of Education, G Lyons, Interim Head of Education and J
Trainer, Head of Child Care & Criminal Justice/Chief Social Worker (all Children’s
Services); C Dalrymple, Head of Facilities & Property Services, L Feely, Head of Housing,
G Hannah, Head of Climate, Public Protection & Roads and G Hutton, Head of Operations
& Service Development (all Environment, Housing & Infrastructure); C McCourt, Head of
Finance & Procurement, M Conaghan, Head of Corporate Governance, P Murray, Head of
Digital, Transformation & Customer Services, L Currie, Managing Solicitor (Projects), D
Low, Democratic Services Manager and C MacDonald, Senior Committee Services Officer
(all Finance & Resources); V Hollows, Chief Executive and F Naylor, Finance, Governance
& Business Improvement Director (both OneRen); and C Laverty, Chief Officer

Page 2

(Renfrewshire Health & Social Care Partnership). 
Webcasting of Council Meeting
Prior to the commencement of the meeting, Provost Cameron intimated that this meeting
would be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site. 
Declarations of Interest
No declarations of interest were intimated prior to the commencement of the meeting. 
Transparency Statements
Councillor Mullin indicated that he had a connection to items 11 and 19 by reason of his
being employed by the NHS. However, he indicated that he had applied the objective test
and did not consider he had an interest to declare. 
Councillor Campbell indicated that she had a connection to items 11 and 19 by reason of
her being employed by the NHS outwith the Renfrewshire Health and Social Care
Partnership area. However, she indicated that she had applied the objective test and did
not consider she had an interest to declare. 
Councillor McNaughtan indicated that he had a connection to item 14 by reason of his
membership of Scottish CND. However, he indicated that he had applied the objective test
and did not consider he had an interest to declare. 
Provost L Cameron indicated that she had a connection to item 14 by reason of her
membership of CND. However, she indicated that she had applied the objective test and
did not consider she had an interest to declare. 
Councillor Nicolson indicated that he had a connection to item 15 by reason of being
related to an employee with Quarriers who provided services in care. However, he
indicated that he had applied the objective test and did not consider he had an interest to
declare. 
Councillor Airlie-Nicolson indicated that she had a connection to item 15 by reason of being
an employee with Quarriers who provided services in care. However, she indicated that
she had applied the objective test and did not consider she had an interest to declare.  
Councillor McDonald indicated that she had a connection to item 15 by reason that a
member of her family attended Quarriers who provided services in care.  However, she
indicated that she had applied the objective test and did not consider she had an interest to
declare.  
Councillor Hughes indicated that she had a connection to item 14 by reason of her
membership of CND. However, she indicated that she had applied the objective test and
did not consider she had an interest to declare.

Page 3

Councillor McMillan indicated that he had a connection to item 15 by reason that a member
of his family was employed by Quarriers who provided services in care.  However, he
indicated that he had applied the objective test and did not consider he had an interest to
declare. 
Councillor Audrey Doig indicated that she had a connection to item 14 by reason of her
membership of the Nuclear Free Local Authorities (Scotland) Board. However, she
indicated that she had applied the objective test and did not consider she had an interest to
declare. 
Order of Business
In terms of Standing Order 16, the Provost intimated that she proposed to alter the order of
business to facilitate the conduct of the meeting by considering items 10 and 12 together
and items 11 and 19 together.   
The Provost further ruled that item 15 was not competent in terms of Standing Order 28. 
Minutes of Meetings of Council, Boards and Panels
There were submitted the Minutes of the following meetings of the Council, Boards and
Panels on the dates specified: 
Council, 29 February 2024
Communities and Housing Policy Board, 12 March 2024
Regulatory Functions Board, 13 March 2024
Education and Children's Services Policy Board, 14 March 2024
Audit, Risk and Scrutiny Board, 18 March 2024
Economy and Regeneration Policy Board, 19 March 2024
Planning and Climate Change Policy Board, 19 March 2024
Infrastructure, Land and Environment Policy Board, 20 March 2024
Personnel Appeals and Applied Conditions of Service Appeals Panel, 21 March 2024
Petitions Board, 25 March 2024
Local Review Body, 26 March 2024
Regulatory Functions Board, 28 March 2024
Finance, Resources and Customer Services Policy Board, 18 April 2024
Placing Requests and Exclusions Appeals Panel, 1 May 2024
Leadership Board, 1 May 2024
Appointment Board - Head of People & Organisational Development, 2 May 2024 
DECIDED: That the Minutes be approved.

Page 4

2  Provost's Update
The Provost provided an update in relation to the duties she had undertaken since the
meeting of the Council held on 4 May 2024. 
DECIDED:  That the update be noted. 
3 Revenue and Capital Budget Update 2024/25
There was submitted a report by the Director of Finance & Resources providing an
update on the Revenue and Capital Budget 2024/25. 
The report intimated that on 29 February 2024, the Council had set its revenue budget
for 2024/25 and Band D Council Tax level. The Scottish Government had passed the
final stage of its 2024/25 budget on 28 February 2024 and the report provided an
update to the Revenue Budget 2024/25 following these additional changes. Details of
the budget allocation for each service was appended to the report. 
DECIDED: 
(a) That the report, which reflected the impact of decisions taken at the meeting of the
Council on 29 February 2024 and changes relating to the final Scottish Budget be
noted; 
(b) That the update outlined in section 7 of the report in relation to the Paisley
Grammar School Community Campus project be noted; 
(c) That an increased capital budget of £85.5 million funded through increased
Learning Estate Investment Programme (LEIP) funding and additional Council
revenue funding of £0.2 million per annum, be agreed; and 
(d) That the risk to the suggested funding arrangements until Scottish Ministers
formally agreed the LEIP Phase 2 funding position as recommended by the LEIP
Board and COSLA be noted. 
4 CIPFA Audit Committee Guidance – Self Assessment and Action
Plan
There was submitted a report by the Director of Finance & Resources relative to the
self-assessment and action plan arising from the Dargavel Independent Review and
the outcome. 
The report intimated that in response to the Dargavel Primary School Independent
Review and recommendations made by the Council’s external auditors, the Council
had undertaken a self-assessment of the Audit, Risk & Scrutiny Board against
CIPFA’s published good practice guide for audit committees. The format of this self-
assessment was agreed at the meeting of the Audit, Risk & Scrutiny Committee held
on 6 November 2023 and members participated in two development sessions on 19
January and 26 February 2024. The report highlighted the outcome from these

Page 5

development sessions and identified the required changes to the Council’s
governance arrangements. 
The revised governance documents were attached as appendices 1-4 to the report. 
DECIDED: 
(a) That the outcome of the self-assessment against the CIPFA guidance for effective
Audit Committees and the two development sessions be noted; 
(b) That the Action Plan resulting from the self-assessment against the CIPFA
guidance for effective Audit Committees, and the progress made in implementing the
actions arising be noted; 
(c) That the proposed revisions to the Terms of Reference for the Audit, Risk &
Scrutiny Board be approved; 
(d) That the proposed revisions to the Guidelines for the Operation of the Audit, Risk
& Scrutiny Board be approved; 
(e) That the proposed revision to the Role Descriptions for Councillors, Senior
Councillors and Leader of the Council be approved; and 
(f) That the proposed revision to the Terms of Reference of the Policy Boards to
include “performance” where it had previously been omitted from the general
delegations be approved. 
5 Council Meetings Timetable and Governance Arrangements
Under reference to item 11 of the Minute of the meeting of the Council held on 29
September 2022, there was submitted a report by the Director of Finance &
Resources relative to a proposed timetable of meetings of the Council and its Boards
from January 2025 until May 2027, a copy of which was appended to the report. 
The report advised that the Conservative group had intimated that it wished to replace
Councillor McGonigle on the Finance, Resources & Customer Services Policy Board
with Councillor Leishman and replace Councillor McGonigle on the Investment
Review Board with Councillor N Graham. The report also recommended that the
Head of Economy & Development Services be appointed as an alternate member on
the Bord of AMIDS (Renfrewshire) LLP. 
Councillor Nicolson, seconded by Councillor Paterson, moved: 
(a) That the timetable for meetings of the Council and its Boards, including the dates
during which there were to be recesses until May 2027 be approved; 
(b) That it be noted that meetings of the Appeals Board and Local Review Body,
although timetabled, would be cancelled in consultation with the respective convener,
if there was no substantive business; 
(c) That it be agreed that the meeting of the Finance, Resources & Customer Services
Policy Board timetabled to be held on 19 September 2024 be changed to 12
September 2024;

Page 6

(d) That it be agreed that the Renfrewshire Council Joint Negotiating Committee for
Teaching Staff would set its meeting dates from January 2025 onwards; 
(e) That it be agreed that Councillor Leishman replace Councillor McGonigle on the
Finance, Resources & Customer Services Policy Board and that Councillor N Graham
replace Councillor McGonigle on the Investment Review Board; 
(f) That it be agreed that Alasdair Morrison, Head of Economy & Development, be
nominated as an alternate member to the Board of AMIDS (Renfrewshire) LLP as
detailed in section 1.10 of the report; 
(g) That Councillor J Cameron be replaced by Councillor Hughes on the Renfrewshire
Health & Social Care Integration Joint Board; 
(h) That Councillor Hughes be replaced on the Economy & Regeneration Policy Board
by Councillor Paterson; and 
(i) That Councillor Hughes be replaced by Councillor Nicolson on the Communities &
Housing Policy Board. 
This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: 
(a) That the timetable for meetings of the Council and its Boards, including the dates
during which there were to be recesses until May 2027 be approved; 
(b) That it be noted that meetings of the Appeals Board and Local Review Body,
although timetabled, would be cancelled in consultation with the respective convener,
if there was no substantive business; 
(c) That it be agreed that the meeting of the Finance, Resources & Customer Services
Policy Board timetabled to be held on 19 September 2024 be changed to 12
September 2024; 
(d) That it be agreed that the Renfrewshire Council Joint Negotiating Committee for
Teaching Staff would set its meeting dates from January 2025 onwards; 
(e) That it be agreed that Councillor Leishman replace Councillor McGonigle on the
Finance, Resources & Customer Services Policy Board and that Councillor N Graham
replace Councillor McGonigle on the Investment Review Board; 
(f) That it be agreed that Alasdair Morrison, Head of Economy & Development, be
nominated as an alternate member to the Board of AMIDS (Renfrewshire) LLP as
detailed in section 1.10 of the report; 
(g) That Councillor J Cameron be replaced by Councillor Hughes on the Renfrewshire
Health & Social Care Integration Joint Board; 
(h) That Councillor Hughes be replaced on the Economy & Regeneration Policy Board
by Councillor Paterson; and 
(i) That Councillor Hughes be replaced by Councillor Nicolson on the Communities &

Page 7

Housing Policy Board. 
6 Clydeplan/Regional Spatial Strategy – Future Governance Update
There was submitted a report by the Chief Executive relative to a future governance
update for the Clydeplan/Regional Spatial Strategy (G&CVSDPA). 
The report sought approval to withdraw from the Glasgow & The Clyde Valley
Strategic Development Planning Authority Joint Committee and agreement to transfer
responsibility for the preparation of a Regional Spatial Strategy to a new Regional
Spatial Planning Sub-committee of the Glasgow City Region Cabinet. 
Provost L Cameron, seconded by Councillor Nicolson, moved: 
(a) That the recommendation of the G&CVSDPA (Clydeplan) Joint Committee to
transfer responsibility for the development of a Regional Spatial Strategy to the
Glasgow City Region Cabinet be noted; 
(b) That Glasgow City Region Cabinet’s approval of the establishment of a new
Regional Spatial Planning Sub-committee to oversee the development of a Regional
Spatial Strategy be noted; 
(c) That it be noted that approval of any future Regional Spatial Strategy, as it affected
Renfrewshire, would be a future decision for Renfrewshire Council; 
(d) That Renfrewshire Council formally withdraw from the Clydeplan Joint Committee
and transfer requisition funding to Glasgow City Council as lead authority for the
Glasgow City Region and grant delegated authority to the Head of Corporate
Governance, Head of Finance & Procurement and Head of Economy & Development
to make any necessary arrangements to carry out that withdrawal; 
(e) That it be agreed to participate in the Regional Spatial Planning Sub-committee;
and 
(f) That it be agreed that Councillor McNaughtan and Councillor Smith be nominated
as the Council’s representatives on the new Regional Spatial Planning Sub-
committee. 
Councillor McMillan, seconded by Councillor Ann-Dowling, moved an amendment that
at Bullet point 6 replace "Confirm elected members Councillor John McNaughtan and
and Councillor Jim Paterson"  with "Council will have one elected member from the
administration and one elected member from the largest opposition party " 
In terms of Standing Order 27, Provost L Cameron and Councillor Nicolson, as mover
and seconder of the motion accepted the amendment which was agreed
unanimously. 
Councillor Nicolson indicated that Councillor Paterson had agreed that he be replaced
by Councillor Smith. This was agreed unanimously.

Page 8

DECIDED: 
(a) That the recommendation of the G&CVSDPA (Clydeplan) Joint Committee to
transfer responsibility for the development of a Regional Spatial Strategy to the
Glasgow City Region Cabinet be noted; 
(b) That Glasgow City Region Cabinet’s approval of the establishment of a new
Regional Spatial Planning Sub-committee to oversee the development of a Regional
Spatial Strategy be noted; 
(c) That it be noted that approval of any future Regional Spatial Strategy, as it affected
Renfrewshire, would be a future decision for Renfrewshire Council; 
(d) That Renfrewshire Council formally withdraw from the Clydeplan Joint Committee
and transfer requisition funding to Glasgow City Council as lead authority for the
Glasgow City Region and grant delegated authority to the Head of Corporate
Governance, Head of Finance & Procurement and Head of Economy & Development
to make any necessary arrangements to carry out that withdrawal; 
(e) That it be agreed to participate in the Regional Spatial Planning Sub-committee;
and 
(f) That it be agreed that Councillor McNaughtan and Councillor Smith be nominated
as the Council’s representatives on the new Regional Spatial Planning Sub-
committee. 
7 Notice of Motion 1 by Councillors Devine and Andy Doig
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors Devine and Andy Doig in the
following terms: 
"The International Community and Palestinian National Self Determination 
“Renfrewshire Council notes that the state of Israel is a signatory to the UN’s
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article One of which supports the
right of national self-determination for all peoples. 
This Council regrets the UK’s recent abstention on the UN Security Council, thereby
failing to grant the Palestinian people full UN membership, and applauds the majority
of UN members who officially recognize Palestine. 
Council accordingly resolves, in solidarity with this objective, to fly the Palestinian flag,
on a bi-monthly basis with the Ukrainian flag.”” 
Councillor Devine, seconded by Councillor Andy Doig, then moved the motion. 
Councillor N Graham, seconded by Councillor Leishman, moved as a first amendment
that the motion be replaced with “Renfrewshire Council notes the following: 
That the State of Israel is a signatory to the United Nations International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, Article One of which supports the right of national self-
determination for all peoples.

Page 9

That a majority of UN member states voted in favour of officially recognising
statehood for the Palestinian people. 
That the United Kingdom abstained on this vote. 
That the United Kingdom's abstention did not prevent the recognition of a State of
Palestine and the granting of full UN membership. The motion was defeated by the
United States of America exercising its right to veto." 
Councillor McMillan, seconded by Councillor Montgomery, moved as a second
amendment to “Keep paragraph1. (Renfrewshire Council notes that…..). 
Paragraph 2 - Replace with Council calls on all parties including international bodies
to create the conditions to work towards a political solution which meets the needs of
all peoples within the region. 
Remove paragraph 3.” 
On the roll being called, between the motion and the first amendment, the following
members voted for the first amendment: Councillors N Graham, Gray, Leishman, J
MacLaren and McGonigle. 
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Adam, Airlie-Nicolson,
Burns, J Cameron, Provost L Cameron, Councillors Campbell, Devine, Andy Doig,
Audrey Doig, Hannigan, Hood, Hughes, Innes, MacFarlane, K MacLaren, M
MacLaren, McEwan, McGurk, McNaughtan, Mylet, Nicolson, Paterson, Rodden,
Shaw and Steel. 
The following members abstained: Councillors Ann-Dowling, Clark, Davidson,
Gilmour, Grady, G Graham, McCulloch, McDonald, McGuire, McMillan, Montgomery,
Mullin and Smith. 
25 members having voted for the motion, 5 members having voted for the first
amendment and 13 members having abstained, the motion was declared carried. 
On the roll being called between the motion and the second amendment, the following
members voted for the second amendment: Councillors Ann-Dowling, Clark,
Davidson, Gilmour, Grady, G Graham, N Graham, Gray, Leishman, J MacLaren,
McCulloch, McDonald, McGonigle, McGuire, McMillan, Montgomery, Mullin and
Smith. 
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Adam, Airlie-Nicolson,
Burns, J Cameron, Provost L Cameron, Councillors Campbell, Devine, Andy Doig,
Audrey Doig, Hood, Hannigan, Hughes, Innes, MacFarlane, K MacLaren, M
MacLaren, McEwan, McGurk, McNaughtan, Mylet, Nicolson, Paterson, Rodden,
Shaw and Steel. 
18 members having voted for the second amendment and 25 members having voted
for the motion, the motion was accordingly declared carried. 
DECIDED: The International Community and Palestinian National Self
Determination 
Renfrewshire Council notes that the state of Israel is a signatory to the UN’s

Page 10

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article One of which supports the
right of national self-determination for all peoples. 
This Council regrets the UK’s recent abstention on the UN Security Council, thereby
failing to grant the Palestinian people full UN membership, and applauds the majority
of UN members who officially recognize Palestine. 
Council accordingly resolves, in solidarity with this objective, to fly the Palestinian flag,
on a bi-monthly basis with the Ukrainian flag. 
8 Notice of Motion 2 by Councillors Andy Doig and Hood
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors Andy Doig and Hood in the
following terms: 
"Renfrewshire HSCP and Lone Working Policy 
“Renfrewshire Council notes that employees, UNISON, and elected members have
raised concerns that the Renfrewshire HSCP is sanctioning lone working by social
care staff at night, and that these concerns, contrary to the lone working policy of the
Scottish Social Services Council, have not been listened to. 
This Council recognizes the primacy of the SSSC guidelines, as a regulatory body for
the wider social care profession, and calls on the HSCP to suspend lone working at
night pending negotiations with employees and all relevant trade unions to resolve
legitimate concerns around health and safety.”" 
Councillors Andy Doig and Hood then moved the motion which was agreed
unanimously. 
DECIDED:  Renfrewshire HSCP and Lone Working Policy 
Renfrewshire Council notes that employees, UNISON, and elected members have
raised concerns that the Renfrewshire HSCP is sanctioning lone working by social
care staff at night, and that these concerns, contrary to the lone working policy of the
Scottish Social Services Council, have not been listened to. 
This Council recognizes the primacy of the SSSC guidelines, as a regulatory body for
the wider social care profession, and calls on the HSCP to suspend lone working at
night pending negotiations with employees and all relevant trade unions to resolve
legitimate concerns around health and safety. 
9 Notice of Motion 3 by Councillors Clark and Davidson
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors Clark and Davidson in the
following terms: 
"To commend Williamsburgh Primary School on an excellent inspection report 
Renfrewshire Council commends the headteacher and staff of Williamsburgh Primary
School on the report from Education Scotland and the Care Inspectorate where the
inspection team found that Williamsburgh Primary School has high quality approaches

Page 11

to learning teaching across the school and nursery. Council notes that this is an
exceptional achievement given the school’s demographic and recent intake. 
Renfrewshire Council echoes the report in its commendations of the highly effective
head teacher and the fact that all staff work well together as a team; it further
commends the schools strong focus on promoting inclusion and diversity; and
acknowledges with approval that the children of Williamsburgh Primary School show
respect, care and kindness." 
Councillors Clark and Davidson then moved the motion which was agreed
unanimously. 
DECIDED: To commend Williamsburgh Primary School on an excellent
inspection report 
Renfrewshire Council commends the headteacher and staff of Williamsburgh Primary
School on the report from Education Scotland and the Care Inspectorate where the
inspection team found that Williamsburgh Primary School has high quality approaches
to learning teaching across the school and nursery. Council notes that this is an
exceptional achievement given the school’s demographic and recent intake. 
Renfrewshire Council echoes the report in its commendations of the highly effective
head teacher and the fact that all staff work well together as a team; it further
commends the schools strong focus on promoting inclusion and diversity; and
acknowledges with approval that the children of Williamsburgh Primary School show
respect, care and kindness. 
Adjournment 
The meeting adjourned at 10.58 am and reconvened at 11.12 am. 
10  Notice of Motion 4 by Councillors Ann-Dowling and Davidson and
Notice of Motion 6 by Councillors J Cameron and Adam
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors Ann-Dowling and Davidson in
the following terms: 
"WASPI 
“Council agrees that the process of delivering justice for Renfrewshire WASPI women
and their families has been too long, and that justice delayed is justice denied. 
Council notes with dismay that despite the publication of the final WASPI report to UK
parliament following a five year investigation by the Parliamentary Health Service
Ombudsman, the UK Government is showing disrespect not only to WASPI women
but to its own watchdog when it refuses to set a date for a compensation
announcement. 
The Ombudsman’s report makes clear that 1950s women have faced pension
injustice, that they are entitled to compensation and that Parliament must now identify
an appropriate mechanism for redress.

Page 12

Council agrees to write to DWP minister Paul Maynard and Prime Minister Rishi
Sunak to demand Government must act on this urgently and bring forward
compensation scheme proposals for debate."” 
Councillor Ann-Dowling, seconded by Councillor Davidson, then moved the motion. 
There was also submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors J Cameron and Adam in
the following terms: 
"Waspi (Women Against State Pension Inequality) 
“Council acknowledges the historic injustice resulting in state pension changes for
women. 
Council supports the WASPI (Women Against State Pension Inequality) women in
their demands for compensation, acknowledges the PHSO’s (Parliamentary and
Health Service Ombudsman) recommendations and calls on the Secretary of State for
Work and Pensions to “act swiftly” on those recommendations and intervene to make
sure a compensation scheme is established. 
Council agrees to write to Mel Stride MP the Secretary of State for Work and
Pensions to establish such a scheme and calls on the Labour Party to commit to the
State Pension Age (Compensation) Bill if they were to win an election.”" 
In terms of Standing Order 27, Councillors Ann-Dowling and Davidson, being the
mover and seconder of Notice of Motion 4, accepted Notice of Motion 6 as an
addition. 
Councillor Leishman, seconded by Councillor McGonigle, moved as an amendment
that the motion be deleted and replaced with “Council notes with dismay that despite
the publication of the final WASPI report to the UK parliament following a five year
investigation by the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman, the UK Government
is showing disrespect not only to WASPI women but to its own watchdog when it
refuses to set a date for a compensation announcement.” 
On the roll being called the following members voted for the amendment: Councillors
N Graham, Gray, Leishman, J MacLaren and McGonigle. 
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Adam, Airlie-Nicolson,
Dowling, Burns, J Cameron, Provost L Cameron, Councillors Campbell, Clark,
Davidson, Devine, Andy Doig, Audrey Doig, Gilmour, Grady, G Graham, Hood,
Hannigan, Hughes, Innes, MacFarlane, K MacLaren, M MacLaren, McCulloch,
McDonald, McEwan, McGuire, McGurk, McMilian, McNaughtan, Montgomery, Mullin,
Mylet, Nicolson, Paterson, Rodden, Shaw, Smith and Steel. 
5 members having voted for the amendment and 38 members having voted for the
motion, the motion was accordingly declared carried. 
DECIDED: WASPI 
Council agrees that the process of delivering justice for Renfrewshire WASPI women
and their families has been too long, and that justice delayed is justice denied. 
Council notes with dismay that despite the publication of the final WASPI report to UK

Page 13

parliament following a five year investigation by the Parliamentary Health Service
Ombudsman, the UK Government is showing disrespect not only to WASPI women
but to its own watchdog when it refuses to set a date for a compensation
announcement. 
The Ombudsman’s report makes clear that 1950s women have faced pension
injustice, that they are entitled to compensation and that Parliament must now identify
an appropriate mechanism for redress. 
Council agrees to write to DWP minister Paul Maynard and Prime Minister Rishi
Sunak to demand Government must act on this urgently and bring forward
compensation scheme proposals for debate.
Council acknowledges the historic injustice resulting in state pension changes for
women. 
Council supports the WASPI (Women Against State Pension Inequality) women in
their demands for compensation, acknowledges the PHSO’s (Parliamentary and
Health Service Ombudsman) recommendations and calls on the Secretary of State for
Work and Pensions to “act swiftly” on those recommendations and intervene to make
sure a compensation scheme is established. 
Council agrees to write to Mel Stride MP the Secretary of State for Work and
Pensions to establish such a scheme and calls on the Labour Party to commit to the
State Pension Age (Compensation) Bill if they were to win an election. 
11  Notice of Motion 5 by Councillors Ann-Dowling and G Graham and
Notice of Motion 13 by Councillors Leishman and N Graham
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors Ann-Dowling and G Graham in
the following terms: 
"CASS 
“Council agrees that the recommendations of the Cass Review be implemented in
Scotland in full. The Council recognises that as a result of the Cass Review the
Sandyford Clinic has now paused all prescribing of puberty blockers to under-18s and
believes that NHS Scotland must ‘follow the science’ on this critical issue. 
Renfrewshire Council will write to Education Scotland recommending that they instruct
all non-Cass compliant schools’ guidance be withdrawn with immediate effect. 
In addition, Renfrewshire Council will write to the Cabinet Secretary for Education and
Skills Scotland requesting an immediate review of Education Policy in light of the
Cass findings.”" 
Councillor Ann-Dowling, seconded by Councillor G Graham, then moved the motion. 
There was also submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors Leishman and N Graham
in the following terms: 
"The Independent Review of Gender Identity Services for Children and Young
People.

Page 14

That this Council welcomes the decision by NHS Scotland to pause the prescription of
puberty-blockers and cross-sex hormones to children and young persons. 
That this Council hopes that the pause will lead to a complete and permanent
cessation of the prescription of puberty-blockers and crosssex hormones to gender
dysphoric children and young persons. This Council is both saddened and horrified
that children have been prescribed these drugs when the long-term impact of them is
not yet known. 
That this Council hopes that all future therapeutic interventions for gender dysphoric
children and young persons will be based on evidence rather than ideology." 
In terms of Standing Order 27 Councillors Ann-Dowling and G Graham, being the
mover and seconder of Notice Motion 5, did not accept Notice of Motion 13 from
Councillors Leishman and N Graham and Notice of Motion 13 then became the
amendment. 
Councillor Hughes, seconded by Councillor Innes, moved as a second amendment
that “Council notes the publication and recommendations of the Cass Review, and the
decision of clinicians at the Sandyford Clinic to pause the prescription of puberty
blockers while NHS Scotland considers the recommendations of the report. 
Council notes that the Scottish Government has committed to considering the findings
of the Cass review, and agrees that it is important that this includes the Scottish
context and is led by clinical expertise. 
Council requests that the Chief Executive write to the Cabinet Secretary for Health
and Social Care requesting a timeline for considerations and reporting to Local
Authorities and Health Boards.” 
On the roll being called between Notice of Motion 5 and the first amendment, the
following members voted for the first amendment: Councillors N Graham, Gray,
Leishman, J MacLaren and McGonigle. 
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Ann-Dowling, Clark,
Davidson, Devine, Andy Doig, Gilmour, Grady, G Graham, Hood, Hannigan,
McCulloch, McDonald, McGuire, McMilian, Montgomery, Mullin and Smith. 
The following members abstained: Councillors Adam, Airlie-Nicolson, Burns, J
Cameron, Provost L Cameron, Councillors Campbell, Audrey Doig, Hughes, Innes,
MacFarlane, K MacLaren, M MacLaren, McEwan, McGurk, McNaughtan, Mylet,
Nicolson, Paterson, Rodden, Shaw and Steel. 
5 members having voted for the first amendment, 17 members having voted for the
motion and 21 members having abstained, the motion was accordingly declared
carried. 
On the roll being called between the motion and the second amendment, the following
members voted for the second amendment: Councillors Adam, Airlie-Nicolson, Burns,
J Cameron, Provost L Cameron, Councillors Campbell, Audrey Doig, Hughes, Innes,
MacFarlane, K MacLaren, M MacLaren, McEwan, McGurk, McNaughtan, Mylet,
Nicolson, Paterson, Rodden, Shaw and Steel. 
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Ann-Dowling, Clark,

Page 15

Davidson, Devine, Andy Doig, Gilmour, Grady, G Graham, N Graham, Gray,
Hannigan, Hood, Leishman, J MacLaren, McCulloch, McDonald, McGonigle,
McGuire, McMillan, Montgomery, Mullin and Smith. 
21 members having voted for the second amendment and 22 members having voted
for the motion, the motion was accordingly declared carried. 
DECIDED: CASS 
Council agrees that the recommendations of the Cass Review be implemented in
Scotland in full. The Council recognises that as a result of the Cass Review the
Sandyford Clinic has now paused all prescribing of puberty blockers to under-18s and
believes that NHS Scotland must ‘follow the science’ on this critical issue. 
Renfrewshire Council will write to Education Scotland recommending that they instruct
all non-Cass compliant schools’ guidance be withdrawn with immediate effect. 
In addition, Renfrewshire Council will write to the Cabinet Secretary for Education and
Skills Scotland requesting an immediate review of Education Policy in light of the
Cass findings. 
12  Notice of Motion 7 by Councillors G Graham and Smith
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors G Graham and Smith in the
following terms: 
"Heartstart in Schools 
“Teaching all young people what to do in an emergency, how to perform CPR and
instruct an adult what to do, has been shown to dramatically increase survival rates
from cardiac arrest. Renfrewshire Council believes this is a life skill every young
person should have and instructs officers to liaise with Save a Life for Scotland to roll
out delivery of a Heartstart Programme across all Renfrewshire Schools starting in the
next academic year.”" 
Councillor Graham, seconded by Councillor Smith, then moved the motion which was
agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: Heartstart in Schools 
Teaching all young people what to do in an emergency, how to perform CPR and
instruct an adult what to do, has been shown to dramatically increase survival rates
from cardiac arrest. Renfrewshire Council believes this is a life skill every young
person should have and instructs officers to liaise with Save a Life for Scotland to roll
out delivery of a Heartstart Programme across all Renfrewshire Schools starting in the
next academic year. 
Sederunt 
Councillor Adam left the meeting prior to consideration of the following item of
business.

Page 16

13  Notice of Motion 8 by Councillors McEwan and Audrey Doig
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors McEwan and Audrey Doig in
the following terms: 
“Renfrewshire Council re-affirms its previous decision for the cancelling of the renewal
of Trident nuclear weapons and calls on both the Labour and Tory Party to withdraw
their support for Trident and of it being the bedrock of the UK Defence Policy. 
Trident is not and never will be an independent nuclear deterrent as its use is
dependent on US foreign policy and permission to deploy. 
Renfrewshire Council has agreed and expressed its view that it wants no part in any
hosting weapons of mass destruction on the Clyde which would lead to Renfrewshire
and Central Scotland being a first strike target in any Warfare. 
Renfrewshire and Scotland no longer want to be seen as complicit in maintaining
Trident as part of the United States Defence Policy." 
Councillor McEwan, seconded by Councillor Audrey Doig, then moved the motion. 
Councillor Leishman, seconded by Councillor McGonigle, moved as a first
amendment that the motion be replaced with “The UK’s independent nuclear
deterrent, Trident, and its upcoming renewal in 2026, is more vital than ever. 
This Council acknowledges that the current state of global politics is more volatile
than it has been since the end of the Cold War. This Council acknowledges the harsh
reality that the UK requires strong military capabilities including a nuclear arsenal for
the protection of its citizens. This Council notes that Trident’s primary purpose is to
deter aggression from potential enemies; its secondary purpose is retaliation in the
event of attack. 
The UK’s nuclear deterrent is entirely under the command and control of the UK
government. No foreign power, including the USA, can intervene in its use or non-
use.” 
On the roll being called between the motion and the first amendment, the following
members voted for the first amendment: Councillors N Graham, Gray, Leishman, J
MacLaren and McGonigle. 
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Airlie-Nicolson, Burns, J
Cameron, Provost L Cameron, Councillors Campbell, Devine, Andy Doig, Audrey
Doig, Hood, Hannigan, Hughes, Innes, MacFarlane, K MacLaren, M MacLaren,
McEwan, McGurk, McNaughtan, Mylet, Nicolson, Paterson, Rodden, Shaw and Steel. 
The following members abstained: Councillors Ann-Dowling, Clark, Davidson,
Gilmour, Grady, G Graham, McCulloch, McDonald, McGuire, McMilian, Montgomery,
Mullin and Smith. 
5 members having voted for the first amendment, 24 members having voted for the
motion, and 13 members having abstained, the motion was accordingly declared
carried.

Page 17

Councillor Smith, seconded by Councillor Davidson, moved as a second amendment
that the motion be replaced with “Council recognises that the only way to achieve
meaningful reductions in nuclear warheads is through international negotiations.
Therefore, council voices its support for multilateral disarmament. 
Reflecting on the current international climate, council does not believe that unilateral
disarmament will stabilise current tensions between democratic countries and
authoritarian regimes with nuclear capabilities, such as Russia and North Korea.” 
On the roll being called between the motion and the second amendment, the following
members voted for the second amendment:  Councillors Ann-Dowling, Clark,
Davidson, Gilmour, Grady, G Graham, N Graham, Gray, Leishman, J MacLaren,
McCulloch, McDonald, McGonigle, McGuire, McMillan, Montgomery, Mullin and
Smith. 
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Airlie-Nicolson, Burns, J
Cameron, Provost L Cameron, Councillors Campbell, Devine, Andy Doig, Audrey
Doig, Hood, Hannigan, Hughes, Innes, MacFarlane, K MacLaren, M MacLaren,
McEwan, McGurk, McNaughtan, Mylet, Nicolson, Paterson, Rodden, Shaw and Steel. 
18 members having voted for the second amendment and 24 members having voted
for the motion, the motion was accordingly declared carried. 
DECIDED:  Renfrewshire Council re-affirms its previous decision for the cancelling of
the renewal of Trident nuclear weapons and calls on both the Labour and Tory Party
to withdraw their support for Trident and of it being the bedrock of the UK Defence
Policy. 
Trident is not and never will be an independent nuclear deterrent as its use is
dependent on US foreign policy and permission to deploy. 
Renfrewshire Council has agreed and expressed its view that it wants no part in any
hosting weapons of mass destruction on the Clyde which would lead to Renfrewshire
and Central Scotland being a first strike target in any Warfare. 
Renfrewshire and Scotland no longer want to be seen as complicit in maintaining
Trident as part of the United States Defence Policy. 
14  Notice of Motion 9 by Councillors McMillan and Ann-Dowling
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors McMillan and Ann-Dowling
which Provost Cameron ruled was not competent in terms of Standing Order 28. 
15  Notice of Motion 10 by Councillors Smith and McMillan
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors Smith and McMillan in the
following terms: 
"Net Zero 
“Council is disappointed in the Scottish Government’s abandonment of the 2030

Page 18

emission reduction target. Council agrees that this latest setback in progress towards
Net Zero greatly damages Scotland’s reputation internationally for being committed to
tackling climate change. 
Council notes that the Chief Executive of Climate Change Committee commented that
the Scottish Government had not set out a credible path to reach its own emissions
targets. Therefore, council instructs the Chief Executive to write to the Cabinet
Secretary for Net Zero asking that the guidance on emissions reporting for local
government be delivered as soon as possible.”" 
Councillor Smith, seconded by Councillor McMillan, then moved the motion. 
Councillor Paterson, seconded by Councillor MacFarlane, moved as an amendment
that the motion be replaced with “Council notes that the UK-wide Climate Change
Committee’s recent articulation that the 2030 target for emissions reduction is not
achievable. 
Council welcomes and recognises the fact that the Scottish Government is reaching a
halfway target of achieving Net Zero and further welcomes the Scottish Government’s
ongoing commitment to ending our contribution to global emissions by 2045 at the
latest. 
Council further welcomes the Scottish Governments commitment to bring forward
legislation that will ensure that the legislative framework better reflects long term
policy making. 
Council notes with concern the recent Labour Party U-turn on their climate pledges
including abandonment of their £28 billion a year green investment pledge which
highlights Labour and are not serious about tackling the climate emergency. 
Council instructs the Chief Executive to write to the Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero
asking them to reaffirm their commitment to achieving Net Zero by 2045 and for
guidance on emissions reporting for local government to be delivered as soon as
practically possible.” 
On the roll being called, the following members voted for the amendment: Councillors
Airlie-Nicolson, Burns, J Cameron, Provost L Cameron, Councillors Campbell, Andy
Doig, Audrey Doig, Hughes, Innes, MacFarlane, K MacLaren, M MacLaren, McEwan,
McGurk, McNaughtan, Mylet, Nicolson, Paterson, Rodden, Shaw and Steel. 
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Ann-Dowling, Clark,
Davidson, Devine, Gilmour, Grady, G Graham, N Graham, Gray, Hannigan, Hood,
Leishman, J MacLaren, McCulloch, McDonald, McGonigle, McGuire, McMillan,
Montgomery, Mullin and Smith. 
21 members voted for the amendment and 21 members voted for the motion.  There
being an equality of votes, the Provost used her second and casting vote in favour of
the amendment. 
DECIDED: Council notes that the UK-wide Climate Change Committee’s recent
articulation that the 2030 target for emissions reduction is not achievable. 
Council welcomes and recognises the fact that the Scottish Government is reaching a
halfway target of achieving Net Zero and further welcomes the Scottish Government’s

Page 19

ongoing commitment to ending our contribution to global emissions by 2045 at the
latest. 
Council further welcomes the Scottish Governments commitment to bring forward
legislation that will ensure that the legislative framework better reflects long term
policy making. 
Council notes with concern the recent Labour Party U-turn on their climate pledges
including abandonment of their £28 billion a year green investment pledge which
highlights Labour and are not serious about tackling the climate emergency. 
Council instructs the Chief Executive to write to the Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero
asking them to reaffirm their commitment to achieving Net Zero by 2045 and for
guidance on emissions reporting for local government to be delivered as soon as
practically possible. 
16  Notice of Motion 11 by Councillors McMillan and Clark
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors McMillan and Clark in the
following terms: 
"Paisley Daily Express 
“Council congratulates the Paisley Daily Express in reaching the milestone of being
150 years old this year."” 
Councillors McMillan and Clark then moved the motion which was agreed
unanimously. 
DECIDED: Paisley Daily Express 
Council congratulates the Paisley Daily Express in reaching the milestone of being
150 years old this year. 
17  Notice of Motion 12 by Councillors Innes and Audrey Doig
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors Innes and Audrey Doig in the
following terms: 
"Lights at Tweedie Hall 
“Council welcomes the installation of LED lighting around the Tweedie Hall in Linwood
and understands that this will make Linwood better equipped to celebrate events and
raise awareness of causes throughout the year. 
Council notes that the campaign to raise awareness of water safety by William
McNally's family was the inspiration for the installation of the LED lights. 
Council thanks the family of William McNally for continuing to raise awareness of
Water Safety on our rivers in Renfrewshire. 
Further notes that an event will be held this summer where the lights will be

Page 20

illuminated for the first time and will shine blue for World Drowning Prevention Day
alongside other Renfrewshire landmarks.”" 
Councillors Innes and Audrey Doig then moved the motion which was agreed
unanimously. 
DECIDED: Lights at Tweedie Hall 
Council welcomes the installation of LED lighting around the Tweedie Hall in Linwood
and understands that this will make Linwood better equipped to celebrate events and
raise awareness of causes throughout the year. 
Council notes that the campaign to raise awareness of water safety by William
McNally's family was the inspiration for the installation of the LED lights. 
Council thanks the family of William McNally for continuing to raise awareness of
Water Safety on our rivers in Renfrewshire. 
Further notes that an event will be held this summer where the lights will be
illuminated for the first time and will shine blue for World Drowning Prevention Day
alongside other Renfrewshire landmarks. 
18  Notice of Motion 14 by Councillors Leishman and N Graham
There was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors Leishman and N Graham in
the following terms: 
"The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 
“That this Council agrees to write to the Scottish Government to press for the repeal
of this legislation. 
That this Council believes that pre-existing legislation on hate crime was fair and
proportionate. 
That this Council notes the statement from the Scottish Police Federation saying that
Police Scotland cannot cope with the demand and that it will impact on policing
services across the communities of Scotland." 
Councillor J Cameron, seconded by Councillor Nicolson, moved as an amendment
that the motion be replaced with “The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act
2021 has consolidated, modernised, and extended existing hate crime legislation
ensuring it is fit for the 21st Century. 
Crimes which are hate based are a daily reality for people who have protected
characteristics. This legislation sends a strong message that offences motivated by
prejudice will not be tolerated in Scotland. 
The Scottish justice system including the Police, have been active regarding hate
offences for decades. This Council has full faith in Police Scotland to deal with any
vexatious complaints and in applying the criminal threshold sensibly and
appropriately."

Page 21

On the roll being called, the following members voted for the amendment: Councillors
Airlie-Nicolson, Burns, J Cameron, Provost L Cameron, Councillors Campbell, Audrey
Doig, Hannigan, Hughes, Innes, MacFarlane, K MacLaren, M MacLaren, McEwan,
McGurk, McNaughtan, Mylet, Nicolson, Paterson, Rodden, Shaw and Steel. 
The following members voted for the motion: Councillors Devine, N Graham, Gray,
Hood, Leishman, J MacLaren and McGonigle. 
The following members abstained: Councillors Ann-Dowling, Clark, Davidson, Andy
Doig, Gilmour, Grady, G Graham, McCulloch, McDonald, McGuire, McMilian,
Montgomery, Mullin and Smith. 
21 members having voted for the amendment, 7 members having voted for the motion
and 14 members having abstained, the amendment was accordingly declared carried. 
DECIDED:  The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 has consolidated,
modernised, and extended existing hate crime legislation ensuring it is fit for the 21st
Century. 
Crimes which are hate based are a daily reality for people who have protected
characteristics. This legislation sends a strong message that offences motivated by
prejudice will not be tolerated in Scotland. 
The Scottish justice system including the Police, have been active regarding hate
offences for decades. This Council has full faith in Police Scotland to deal with any
vexatious complaints and in applying the criminal threshold sensibly and
appropriately.