Democracy Spraffa

Financial Update Report to Council Sept 23

Renfrewshire Council · 28 September 2023
Back to Council — 28 September 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

___________________________________________________________________
To: Council
On: 28 September 2023
___________________________________________________________________
Report by: Director of Finance and Resources
___________________________________________________________________
Heading: Financial update
___________________________________________________________________
1. Summary 
1.1 The Council’s financial outlook is subject to ongoing risk over the short and
medium term as the Council continues develop financial proposals which
underpin the Council’s financial sustainability. 
1.2 The Scottish Government Programme for Government (PfG) was recently
published, which provides useful context for the potential outlook for the local
government settlement and an indication of Scottish Government legislative
priorities. The PfG outlined a range of proposed areas which will likely impact
on the range and scope of services delivered by local government, and
consequently the financial position of the Council.   
1.3 COSLA and the Scottish Government continue to discuss the development of
a fiscal framework as outlined in the Verity House agreement. While the
potential additional flexibility councils may have in terms of their revenue grant
allocation is welcome, the framework in itself is unlikely to substantially improve
the current fraught financial position of local government. 
1.4 The medium to longer term outlook for the Council’s finances remains
challenging and is broadly consistent with the position previously reported to
members. An update in relation to Strathclyde Pension Fund is included, which
could provide some short term financial flexibility. Whilst the immediate financial
position of the Council remains secure with the 23/24 projected outturn broadly
in line with the planned position; there remain risks in the short term which are
outlined in the report – predominantly related to the 23/24 pay settlement which
remains unresolved.

Page 2

1.5 A suggested amendment to the Council’s capital plan is recommended to
include provision for new schools investment. 
2. Recommendations
2.1  It is recommended that members: 
 Note the financial updates provided in the report 
 Agree the revisions to the capital plan as outlined in section 5. 
3. Revenue Update 
Current Financial Position  
3.1 Council agreed the 2023/24 budget on 2 March, including the utilisation of non-
recurring reserve funding of up to £12 million to generate an in year breakeven
budget position. Broadly, this use of reserves is to fund expected cost pressures
in 23/24 of £4 million relating to an anticipated parking charge income shortfall
and increased costs of external residential childcare places; with potentially up
to a further £7 million relating to the agreed loans fund budget rebuild which
has been outlined in successive reports to Council. In addition, Council agreed
to utilise a further £0.6 million of reserves in setting the base 23/24 budget. The
most recent financial overview report outlines an estimated £5.6 million
overspend – slightly above the estimated draw from reserves which has been
planned (excluding that planned for loans fund costs). This position will
continue to be closely monitored over the remainder of the financial year. 
3.2 However, substantial risks remain in relation to the 2023/24 local government
pay award which is still to be agreed. National pay negotiations are ongoing
and are anticipated to again be challenging given the affordability constraints
facing local government. As was the case in 2021/22 and 2022/23, the level of
pay provision which has been incorporated into the 2023/24 base budget may
require to be adjusted depending on the concluded outcome of the
negotiations. A further unanticipated cost pressure has also emerged in relation
to the Scottish Government and COSLA recent agreement to pay a nationally
set rate to foster and kinship carers, backdated to 1 April 2023. While additional
funding has been agreed in relation to paying the new rate, it is anticipated the
actual increase in costs for Renfrewshire will exceed the additional funding. 
3.3 As has been reported to Council previously, there is significant reliance on non-
recurring resource to underpin the revenue position while measures are taken
to develop a more sustainable spend level.  However, given the significant level
of savings already generated by the Council over the past decade, it is
increasingly difficult to implement savings which will not impact on service
delivery. As the Council continues to implement new ways of working there
remains the potential for cost to be incurred in relation to the transitioning of
both workplace accommodation and ICT provision to a hybrid working
environment that is suitable and appropriate to facilitate safe and efficient
working practice.

Page 3

In addition, and as outlined in previous reports to members, increasing pressure
is being experienced in the Council’s capital investment programme owing to
high levels of construction inflation and an increasing number of contractor
claims for additional costs. 
Revenue Outlook
3.4 The report to Council in June outlined a medium term forecast which - based
on the Council’s central planning assumption – results in a financial gap in the
range of £45m-£50m over the three year period 2024/25 to 2026/27. This
forecast is prior to any decision on council tax. Assuming a 5% uplift in council
tax in each year, the cumulative gap would reduce to a range of £30m-£35m.
3.5 Council agreed to develop a further portfolio of work aimed at ensuring financial
sustainability (and short term financial stability) is prioritised; and that savings
of £35m are targeted over the next three years in order to close this projected
financial gap. This position has not changed over the summer period and the
broad assumptions and scale of financial challenge remain valid. However,
inflationary pressure on costs remains an issue; as does the potential for
increased borrowing costs associated with capital investments while interest
rates are still projected to increase. 
3.6 The Council has been advised by Strathclyde Pension Fund that the result of
their most recent triennial actuarial revaluation suggests that the Fund is in a
positive position in terms of overall funding levels, with assets exceeding
liabilities significantly. This is due to investment returns over the past three
years being very strong; and the discount rate which is used as the basis to
measure future liabilities also moving favourably compared to three years ago.
The sum of these two movements is that the fund is in a position where the
funding strategy for the main employer group (which includes all councils who
are members) has been revised and the level of employer contributions to the
fund in the long term reduced from 19.3% to 17.5%.  This level is viewed by the
fund actuaries as being consistent with the long term likely movement in overall
the funding level. In addition, the proposed funding strategy for 2024/25 and
2025/26 is to reduce employer contributions to 6.5% on an interim basis. This
short term reduction in employer contributions will reduce Council costs and
provide an element of financial flexibility for the Council which will be factored
in to the Council’s medium term financial planning arrangements and can assist
in smoothing the timeline by which recurring savings are required to be
delivered. However members should be aware this benefit is of a short term
and one-off nature – it does not address the Council’s longer term underlying
financial sustainability. 
3.7 Therefore the Council will still require to take key decisions on service reform,
scope and design which ensure service costs are in line with available resource
over the medium to longer term, with reserve balances being used prudently to
provide some time and space for service change to be embedded. Without this
decisive action, and delivery of substantial savings and cost reduction, the
Council will find itself in a position where reserves are exhausted and no longer
capable of supporting the recurring revenue budget deficit. In such
circumstances the Council would move to a position of being financially
unsustainable – necessitating immediate, unstructured spend controls and
rapid cost reductions which would undoubtedly impact services and
communities more severely than any planned change.

Page 4

Elected members will have seen recent examples in England where major
councils have moved into such territory for a variety of underlying reasons and
where the impact on services is expected to be both rapid and significant.
3.8 Members will be aware that securing £35m of financial savings represents a
very significant challenge for the organisation, not just reflecting the scale of
savings but in the context of the Council being required to do so after a long
period of financial challenge. It is highly unlikely that savings at this scale can
be delivered without the Council reprioritising spend, impacting on the ability to
deliver all current service levels in their current form, breadth or scale. 
4 Scottish Government Update
4.1 The Scottish Government published on 5 September their Programme for
Government (PfG). This outlines the Government’s policy intentions and
legislative programme for the coming parliamentary year.  
4.2 The financial impact of the measures outlined in the PfG will not become clear
until the Scottish Budget is published later in the year (possibly 14 December if
previous years are a guide), however there are a number of areas where the
Scottish Government’s plans may impact on local government finances, the
most significant of which are outlined below:
a) Take initial steps to increase the levers available to councils by
delivering secondary legislation – enabling councils to apply up to a
100% premium on Council Tax rates for second homes, and discuss
other options with Local Government based on the analysis of
responses.
b) Continue the Joint Working Group on sources of Local Government
funding to identify further options for reforms to Council Tax.
c) Progress the shared programme of work with COSLA under the Verity
House Agreement, in particular a revised Fiscal Framework between
the Scottish Government and Local Government.
d) Deliver a more efficient approach to public sector property management
through the new Single Scottish Estate programme.
e) Work with Local Government to develop the local infrastructure and
services needed to provide childcare from nine months to the end of
primary school in specific communities in six local authority areas.
f) Commit to provide the necessary funding in the next Budget to increase
the pay of social care workers in the PVI sectors in a direct care role –
and those working in the PVI sector to deliver funded early learning and
childcare – to at least £12 per hour.
g) Work with Local Government to develop the local infrastructure and
services needed to provide childcare from nine months to the end of
primary school in specific communities in six local authority areas.
h) Work with local authority and other sectoral partners to phase in an
expanded national offer for families with two-year-olds, focused on
those who will benefit most. This will build on the foundations of the
existing 1140 programme.

Page 5

i) Work with COSLA in the coming year to prepare schools and
infrastructure for the expansion of universal free school meal provision
to Primary 6 and Primary 7 pupils during 2026, starting with those in
receipt of the Scottish Child Payment.
4.3 Work to agree a rules-based fiscal framework is ongoing with substantive
discussion ongoing between the Scottish Government and COSLA as to how a
framework would operate as outlined in the Verity House agreement. The aim
of the framework is to provide increased flexibility for local government in the
use of funding provided by the Scottish Government and the removal as far as
possible of ringfencing. A firm funding base and potential guaranteed share of
Scottish Government total funding is also under discussion, however
discussion on these issues is ongoing. What is clear however, is that while there
may be increased flexibility resulting from the framework, the fundamental
question of quantum for the local government settlement is unlikely to be
addressed. In summary, the agreement of a fiscal framework is unlikely to
address the core issue of ongoing financial sustainability for councils. 
4.4 Within the list above there are a number of additional commitments which local
government will require to deliver; and it will be critical for the Council to
understand the financial implications, timing and additional funding to be
provided in order to ensure that the cost burden for service delivery does not
further adversely impact on the Council’s financial outlook.
5 Capital Investment Programme
5.1 Previous reports to Council have outlined the ongoing pressure within the capital
programme – across both general fund and the Housing Revenue Account – with
inflationary costs continuing to be experienced. Capital grant funding addressed
only the most core elements of demand in terms of lifecycle maintenance,
resulting in much of the Council’s capital investment plans requiring to be funded
through prudential borrowing. 
5.2 Council agreed the 23/24 – 27/28 non-housing capital programme in March.
Subsequent to the capital plan being agreed, decisions by the Education and
Children’s Services Policy Board have committed to the provision of a new
primary school in the Dargavel area, and an extension to Park Mains High School
to accommodate 400 pupils. Planning and procurement work for both these
projects has commenced. It is recommended that provisional spend provision of
£45 million for a new primary school, and £30 million for the Park Mains extension
be incorporated into the capital plan, phased across the 2023/24 to 2026/27
financial years. These total costs are based on SFT metrics applicable to schools
projects to be delivered under Phase 3 of the LEIP programme. At this stage
these costs can only be indicative and will be subject to refinement as the design
of both projects develops.
5.3 It is recognised that a financial contribution towards the costs of expanding
secondary school provision up to 200 pupils is a condition of the s75 agreement
with BAE Systems for the Dargavel development. For the purposes of the capital
plan the cash contribution is therefore anticipated to be half of the estimated
capital spend for the extension. Given this, it is recommended the capital plan
also be updated to reflect this contribution, with the balance of funding required
across both projects being secured through prudential borrowing. The revenue
costs associated with this borrowing will be incorporated into the Council’s
medium and longer term financial planning arrangements.

Page 6

Implications of the Report
1. Financial – the report highlights the scale and shape of the short and medium
term financial challenge facing the Council. The early delivery of the
transformation programme and other financial sustainability workstreams as
outlined in the report are critical to ultimately supporting the Council secure a
financially sustainable position.   
2. HR & Organisational Development – the medium term financial position and
associated plans require to align with workforce and service plans to ensure
the size and composition of the Council workforce remains appropriate and
affordable. 
3. Community/Council Planning – the Council requires to remain financially
sustainable in order to deliver on its priorities as outlined in the Council and
Community Plans; and these revised Plans will in turn require to inform the
financial strategy.  
4. Legal - none 
5. Property/Assets – none 
6. Information Technology – none
7. Equality & Human Rights – The recommendations contained within this report
have been assessed in relation to their impact on equalities and human rights.
No negative impacts on equality groups or potential for infringement of
individuals’ human rights have been identified arising from the
recommendations contained in the report. If required following implementation,
the actual impact of the recommendations and the mitigating actions will be
reviewed and monitored, and the results of the assessment will be published
on the Council’s website. 
8. Health & Safety - none
9. Procurement – none
10. Risk – as outlined in the report, the Council’s financial risk exposure both in the
immediate term and over the medium term remains high. The report outlines 
ongoing uncertainty as that robust decisions on service provision will be
required as part of the medium term financial planning arrangements to protect
the Council’s immediate financial stability and resilience but also continue to
progress toward medium term financial sustainability. 
11. Privacy Impact - none

Page 7

12. Cosla Policy Position – COSLA are undertaking active engagement with the
Scottish Government in relation to the fiscal framework in order to protect as
far as possible the interests of local government.
13. Climate Risk – the financial challenges the Council is facing will potentially
impact on its ability to implement actions and investments which would be key
to achieving net zero aspirations.
__________________________________________________________________ 
Author:           Alastair MacArthur, Director of Finance & Resources