Democracy Spraffa

Treasury Management Annual Report 2025-26

Renfrewshire Council · 22 June 2026
Back to Council — 22 June 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1 
PUBLIC 
___________________________________________________________________
To: Council 
On: 22 June 2026
___________________________________________________________________
Report by: Director of Finance and Resources
___________________________________________________________________
Heading: Treasury Management Annual Report for 2025/26
___________________________________________________________________
1. Summary
1.1. It is a requirement of the Local Government Investments (Scotland)
Regulations 2010 that a report outlining the treasury management activity
undertaken during the year is presented to Council at the end of each
financial year.   
1.2. This report meets the requirements of these regulations, as well as the
CIPFA Code of Practice on Treasury Management (the Code) and the
CIPFA Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities (the
Prudential Code). 
1.3. All aspects of the Treasury Policy Statement were complied with in 2025/26. 
___________________________________________________________________
2. Recommendations
2.1. It is recommended that the Council approves the Treasury Management
Annual Report for 2025/26.
_________________________________________________________
3. Review of 2025/26 Treasury Activities
3.1 Treasury Portfolio Position at 31 March 2026 
The Council's external borrowing position at the beginning and end of the
most recent financial year was as follows:

Page 2

2 
PUBLIC    
Borrowing Position
as at 31 March 2025
Borrowing Position
as at 31 March 2026 Change 
£ m
(a)
Average
Interest
Rate 
£ m
(b)
Average
Interest
Rate  (b) - (a)
Long-term Borrowings          
Public Work Loans Board
(PWLB) Fixed Interest 237.05 3.80% 294.44 3.77% 57.39
Market Loans 46.77 4.70% 46.77 4.70% 0.00
Total Long-term 283.82 3.95% 341.21 3.90% 57.39
Short-term Borrowings     
Common Good Funds 4.05 4.20% 4.50 4.01% 0.45
Other Partner Bodies 29.80 4.20% 35.60 4.01% 6.31
Total Short-term 33.85 4.20% 40.10 4.01% 6.76
Total Borrowings 317.67 3.96% 381.31 3.91% 64.15       
Temporary Investments 23.04 4.45% 65.42 3.73% 42.38 
4. Review of Borrowing and Investment Outturn for 2025/26 
4.1. Overall, the Council’s total external borrowings increased by £57.39m, all
from PWLB borrowing. This additional borrowing was undertaken to maintain
appropriate cash balances in support of the Capital Investment Programme. 
4.2. Temporary investments held by the Council increased by £42.38m. The
increase in investments is due to the new PWLB borrowing, together with
grant income received (Levelling Up Fund) at the end of the financial year. 
5. Review of Borrowing Strategy during 2025/26 
5.1. The strategy for 2025/26 was approved by Council on 27 February 2025.
Based on the Council’s planned programme of investments and interest rate
forecasts for the year, the Council’s borrowing strategy was to firstly use
internal cash balances to finance the Capital Investment Programme. 
5.2. This strategy was prudent, as borrowing rates have continued to remain
persistently high throughout the financial year. 
5.3. Given the changing climate and the risks inherent in economic forecasts, a
cautious approach was taken during the year regarding treasury operations.
The Director of Finance and Resources monitored interest rates and
adopted a pragmatic strategy based upon the following principles to manage
interest rate risks:

Page 3

3 
PUBLIC
• if there was considered to be a significant risk of a sharp FALL in long
and short-term rates, (e.g. due to a marked increase of risks around
relapse into recession or of risks of deflation), then long-term borrowings
would have been postponed, and potential rescheduling from fixed rate
funding into short-term borrowing would have been considered.
• if there was considered to be a significant risk of a much sharper RISE
in long and short-term rates than initially expected, perhaps arising from
an acceleration in the start date and in the rate of increase in central
bank rates, an increase in world economic activity or a sudden increase
in inflation risks, then the portfolio position would have been re-
appraised.  Fixed rate funding would have been considered whilst
interest rates were lower than they were projected to be in the next few
years.
6. Review of Investment Strategy and Investment Outturn for 2025/26 
6.1. In carrying out investment activities, the Council will have regard to the Local
Government Investment (Scotland) Regulations 2010, the accompanying
Scottish Government Finance Circular 5/2010 and the CIPFA Treasury
Management in the Public Services Code of Practice and Cross-Sectoral
Guidance Notes (“the Treasury Management Code”). The Council’s
investment priorities are:
• the security of capital; and
• liquidity of its investments. 
The Council’s investment policy was outlined in the Council’s Annual
Investment Strategy Report 2025/26, which was approved by Council on 27
February 2025. This policy set out the Council’s approach for choosing
investment categories and counterparties and is based on credit ratings
provided by the three main credit rating agencies, supplemented by
additional market data (such as rating outlooks, credit default swaps, bank
share prices etc.). 
6.2. The expectation for interest rates within the Treasury Management Strategy
for 2025/26 was that the Bank Rate had peaked and would gradually reduce
throughout the financial year. Outturn rates were broadly in line with these
forecasts. It is now anticipated that the Bank Rate will remain at 3.75%, with
there being little likelihood of further reductions during the 2026/27 financial
year. 
6.3. During 2025/26, the Council only invested with institutions listed in the
Council’s approved Counterparty list and in the permitted investment

Page 4

4 
PUBLIC
categories. The investment activity during the year conformed to the
approved strategy and the Council had no liquidity issues. 
6.4. The table below shows interest rates achieved by the Council on its
temporary investments during the year and, for comparison, the benchmark
rate.
Temporary investments -
internally managed 2024/25 2025/26
Average Investment £111.27m £68.41m
Actual rate of return 5.07% 4.01%
Benchmark return 4.90% 4.01% 
6.5. The actual rate of return was at the benchmark figure, reflecting the short-
term nature of investments in 2025/26, due to lower cashflow levels. 
6.6. The current Treasury Strategy remains appropriate to the Council’s ongoing
financial, investment and treasury requirements, and supports the Council’s
overall financial position, investment priorities and medium-term financial
forecasts. While the refreshed 2026/27 strategy was recently approved on
26 February 2026, it is continually being reviewed as the economic and
political landscape changes and, as the Council’s financial strategy
develops, to ensure that borrowing and investments are managed to
accommodate both short to medium-term treasury requirements, and also to
ensure that best value is secured from longer term investment in instruments
appropriate for this purpose and consistent with the Council’s risk profile. 
*SONIA (Sterling Overnight Index Average) is based on actual transactions and reflects the average of
the interest rates that banks pay to borrow sterling overnight from other financial institutions and other
institutional investors.
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
5.00%
5.50%
6.00%
Interest Rates
Temporary Investment Rates
Renfrewshire Vs Comparator
SONIA Renfrewshire

Page 5

5 
PUBLIC
7. Debt Rescheduling 
7.1. Whilst it was considered, no debt rescheduling was undertaken during the
year, as the differential between PWLB new borrowing rates and premature
repayment rates meant that this would not have been economical. 
8. Compliance with Treasury Limits 
8.1. The Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities, which came
into force on 1 April 2004, allows greater local flexibility for investment
decisions that are informed and supported by a suite of performance
indicators. The 2025/26 indicators were approved by Council on 27 February
2025 and an update reported to the Council on 11 December 2025. 
8.2. The Council’s overall performance on these indicators provides a firm basis
for the monitoring and control of capital investment and borrowing and for
determining that it is affordable. Certain headline indicators are sub-divided
per recommended best practice into two programmes: housing and non-
housing. 
8.3. The key performance indicators for Treasury are: 
• An Operational Boundary for the Council’s external borrowing (the
upper limit for the aggregate external borrowing needed), and an
Authorised Limit for the Council’s external borrowing, being the upper
limit of aggregate external borrowing that is affordable and prudent; 
• A ratio of financing costs to net revenue stream (an affordability
measure for debt repayments); and
• An upper limit for fixed rate borrowing maturing within the short,
medium and long-term, to ensure that the Council is not exposed to a
significant re-financing requirement in the short to medium term. 
In addition, it is a requirement of the Council's Treasury Policy Statement
that the maximum amount of long-term borrowing maturing in any one year
will be no more than 15%, and the maximum amount of long-term borrowing
maturing in any five-year period will be no more than 45%.  The objective of
these limits is to ensure that the Council is not exposed to a significant re-
financing requirement over a short period when interest rates could be
relatively high. 
8.4. The main source of the Council’s borrowing is from the Public Works Loan
Board (PWLB). The borrowing rates are based on, and are determined by,
the yield on UK Government bonds (gilts). The main influences on gilt yields
are Bank Rate, inflation expectations, and movements in US treasury yields.

Page 6

6 
PUBLIC
8.5. Gilt yields continued to be volatile during 2025/26.  At 31 March 2026 all gilt
yields (1-5 years) ranged between 5.24% and 5.48%, while the 10-year and
25-year yields were 5.97% and 6.49% respectively. 
8.6. For PWLB rates, the various margins for borrowing are as follows:
• Standard Rate is gilt plus 100 basis points (G+100bps)
• Certainty Rate is gilt plus 80 basis points (G+80bps)
• Local Infrastructure Rate is gilt plus 60bps (G+60bps)
• HRA Rate is gilt plus 40bps (G+40bps) 
8.7. There is likely to be a gradual fall in short-dated gilt yields and PWLB rates
over the next two years as the Bank Rate is forecast to gradually fall from
3.75% in March 2026 to around 3.25% in March 2028. 
8.8 External Borrowing at the Year-end 
The Council’s aggregate external debt was contained within both the
Operational Boundary and the Authorised Limit. The final outturn position
compared to the prudential limits forecast at 11 December 2025 is as
follows: 
2024/25
Outturn  
2025/26
Probable
2025/26
Outturn
£m  £m £m
398 Aggregate external debt at 31 March   419
598  Operational Boundary 550  
624  Authorised Limit 578   
8.9  Ratio of Financing Costs to Net Revenue Stream 
This indicator is expressed as a proportion. Both the Housing and Non-
housing programme were within the limits forecast at Period 10. 
2024/25
Outturn  
2025/26
Probable
2025/26
Outturn 
% % %
2.88 Non-Housing 3.04 2.77
22.70 Housing 24.15 19.53

Page 7

7 
PUBLIC
8.10 Fixed Rate Borrowing Maturing in the Short, Medium and Long-term
This indicator is expressed as a proportion of the total debt of the Council.
The maturity profile of the Council’s external debt is well within the approved
limits. The outturn compared to the mid-year estimate is as follows:
2024/25
Outturn  
2025/26
Approved
Upper Limits
2025/26
Outturn
% % %  
Short-term   
1.76 Under 12 months 15 0.00  
Medium term   
0.00 12 months and within 24 months 15 4.40
0.00 24 months and within 5 years 45 14.36
6.52 5 years and within 10 years 50 4.95  
Long-term   
91.72 10 years and above 100 76.29 
8.11 Long-Term Borrowing Maturity Profile 
During the financial year, the Council operated within the treasury limits set
out in the Council’s Treasury Policy Statement and Treasury Management
Strategy Statement. The Council's debt maturity profile at 31 March 2026
was within these limits.
The table below shows the maturity profile of the Council’s long-term
borrowing. The solid black line shows the debt maturing, and therefore
requiring to be replaced, during each year up to 2072. The lighter broken line
shows the debt maturing in the prospective five-year period for each year up
to 2072. All years are below 40% and well within our policy limits.

Page 8

8 
PUBLIC
___________________________________________________________________
Implications of the Report
1. Financial - As described in the report; the Treasury Management Strategy
Statement, treasury management and prudential indicators all assist in
providing assurance that the Council’s treasury management activities and
longer term spending plans are affordable, prudent and sustainable. 
2. HR & Organisational Development - There are no direct implications
arising from the recommendations in this report. 
3. Community/Council Planning
Community Plan
Our Renfrewshire is thriving The Council’s revenue and capital spend
ensures that its facilities are fit for
purpose and safe for the community, to
maximise accessibility.
Our Renfrewshire is well 
Our Renfrewshire is fair 
Our Renfrewshire is safe
Council Plan
Reshaping our place, our
economy and our future The Council’s revenue and capital spend
ensures that its facilities are fit for
purpose and safe for the community, to
maximise accessibility.
Building strong, safe and
resilient communities
Tackling inequality, ensuring
opportunities for all
Creating a sustainable
Renfrewshire for all to enjoy
Ongoing revenue and capital budget
monitoring is a tool to enable good
financial management so that the Council
has resources now and in the future for
continued service delivery.
Working together to improve
outcomes 
4. Legal - There are no direct implications arising from the recommendations
in this report. 
5. Property/Assets - There are no direct implications arising from the
recommendations in this report. 
6. Information Technology - There are no direct implications arising from the
recommendations in this report. 
7. Equality & Human Rights - There are no direct implications arising from
the recommendations in this report.

Page 9

9 
PUBLIC
8. Health & Safety - There are no direct implications arising from the
recommendations in this report. 
9. Procurement - There are no direct implications arising from the
recommendations in this report. 
10. Risk - The report outlines a range of measures taken during the course of
2025/26 to manage treasury risks and the risks associated with investment
regulations in respect of the borrowing and investment activity of the
Council, along with measures to manage these risks. 
11. Privacy Impact - There are no direct implications arising from the
recommendations in this report. 
12. Children’s Rights - There are no direct implications arising from the
recommendations in this report. 
13. Climate Change - There are no direct implications arising from the
recommendations in this report. 
14. Cosla Policy Position - N/A
_________________________________________________________
List of Background Papers: 
Non-Housing Capital Investment Programme, Prudential Framework and Treasury
Management Strategy, and Capital Strategy 2025/26 – 2029/30, Council, 27
February 2025.
Treasury Management and Prudential Indicators Mid-Year Review 2025/26, Council
11 December 2025
Non-Housing Capital Investment Programme, Prudential Framework and Treasury
Management Strategy, and Capital Strategy 2026/27 – 2035/36, Council, 26
February 2026.
___________________________________________________________________ 
Author: Christine McCourt, Head of Finance and Procurement