Democracy Spraffa

23/01101/Fll

Perth and Kinross Council · 12 March 2025
Back to Planning and Placemaking Committee — 12 March 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Perth and Kinross Council
Planning and Placemaking Committee – 12 March 2025
Report of Handling by Strategic Lead: Economy, Development and Planning
(Report No. 25/54)
PROPOSAL: Erection of holiday accommodation apartments, formation of
parking area and associated works
LOCATION: Land east of Burgess Lodge, Kinloch Rannoch, Pitlochry, PH17
2QL
Ref. No: 23/01101/FLL
Ward No: P4 Highland
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application as the development is considered
to comply with the relevant provisions of the Development Plan.  SEPA however
maintain an objection, so any approval would need to be referred to Scottish
Ministers. 
Background and Description of Proposal
1 The site is related to the Loch Rannoch Hotel, which lies to the northwest of
Kinloch Rannoch.  Particularly the proposal relates to an existing marina on Loch
Rannoch, with the main hotel complex to the northeast.  There are a number of
timeshare properties in separate ownership to the west of the hotel, stepping up
the hillside. 
2 The majority of the site lies (south) below the B846 road and is currently serviced
by an access down the slope. Existing buildings within the site are: a boat house,
gym, staff accommodation and storage buildings, they are not traditional in
design or finish with corrugated metal sheeting roofs, timber paneling and render.
3 The proposal involves the demolition of these existing buildings and the
development of the site to provide a building containing holiday apartments. The
proposed building is to work with the slope and thus sees the development over
4 levels of accommodation.  The design and finishes are contemporary.

Page 2

4 The proposal also involves a new carpark and dedicated pedestrian links to the
B846.
5 The determination of the application has been delayed, as a SEPA objection has
been explored.  Additional information has been submitted in an attempt to
address SEPA’s their concerns, however this has not seen the objection
removed.  The issues are detailed in the Drainage and Flooding paragraphs
below and should the committee agree with the recommendation to approve the
application, a referral to Scottish Ministers would be required as there is an
unresolved objection from a Statutory Consultee.
Pre-Application Consultation
6 Pre application Reference: 22/00111/PREAPL
7 The proposed development is not classed as a Major development in terms of
the Town and Country Planning (Hierarchy of Developments) (Scotland)
Regulations 2009, therefore the applicant was not required to undertake any
formal pre-application consultation with the local community.
Development Plan 
8 The Development Plan for the area comprises National Planning Framework 4
(NPF4) and the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) (LDP2). 
National Planning Framework 4  
9 The National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is the Scottish Government’s long-
term spatial strategy with a comprehensive set of national planning policies.  This
strategy sets out how to improve people’s lives by making sustainable, liveable
and productive spaces.   
10 NPF4 was adopted on 13 February 2023. NPF4 has an increased status over
previous NPFs and comprises part of the statutory development plan. 
11 The Council’s assessment of this application has considered the following
policies of NPF4: 
 Policy 1: Tackling the Climate and Nature Crisis
 Policy 2: Climate Mitigation and Adaptation
 Policy 3: Biodiversity
 Policy 4: Natural Places
 Policy 6: Forestry, Woodland and Trees
 Policy 13: Sustainable Transport
 Policy 14: Design, Quality and Place
 Policy 22: Flood Risk and Water Management
 Policy 30: Tourism

Page 3

Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 
12 The Local Development Plan 2 (2019) (LDP2) sets out a vision statement for the
area and states that, “Our vision is of a Perth and Kinross which is dynamic,
attractive and effective which protects its assets whilst welcoming population and
economic growth.” It is the most recent statement of Council policy and is
augmented by Supplementary Guidance.
13 The principal relevant policies are:
 Policy 1B: Placemaking
 Policy 1A: Placemaking
 Policy 2: Design Statements
 Policy 5: Infrastructure Contributions
 Policy 8: Rural Business and Diversification
 Policy 9C: Caravan Sites, Chalets and Timeshare Developments: Chalets,
Timeshare and Fractional Ownership
 Policy 32: Embedding Low & Zero Carbon Generating Technologies in New
Development
 Policy 38A: Environment and Conservation: International Nature
Conservation Sites
 Policy 38B: Environment and Conservation: National Designations
 Policy 39: Landscape
 Policy 40A: Forestry, Woodland and Trees: Forest and Woodland Strategy
 Policy 40B: Forestry, Woodland and Trees: Trees, Woodland and
Development
 Policy 41: Biodiversity
 Policy 47: River Tay Catchment Area
 Policy 52: New Development and Flooding
 Policy 53B: Water Environment and Drainage: Foul Drainage
 Policy 53C: Water Environment and Drainage: Surface Water Drainage
 Policy 53E: Water Environment and Drainage: Water Supply
 Policy 55: Nuisance from Artificial Light and Light Pollution
 Policy 56: Noise Pollution
 Policy 60B: Transport Standards and Accessibility Requirements: New
Development Proposals
Statutory Supplementary Guidance 
14 
 Supplementary Guidance - Developer Contributions & Affordable Housing
(adopted in 2020) 
 Supplementary Guidance - Placemaking (adopted in 2020) 
Other Policies 
15 Non-Statutory Guidance.

Page 4

National Guidance 
 
16 The Scottish Government expresses its planning policies through The National
Planning Framework, Planning Advice Notes, Creating Places, Designing
Streets, National Roads Development Guide and a series of Circulars.   
Planning Advice Notes
17 The following Scottish Government Planning Advice Notes (PANs) and Guidance
Documents are of relevance to the proposal:
 PAN 40 Development Management
 PAN 51 Planning, Environmental Protection and Regulation
 PAN 61 Planning and Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems
 PAN 68 Design Statements
 PAN 69 Planning and Building standards Advice on Flooding
 PAN 75 Planning for Transport
Creating Places 2013
18 Creating Places is the Scottish Government’s policy statement on architecture
and place. It sets out the comprehensive value good design can deliver. It notes
that successful places can unlock opportunities, build vibrant communities and
contribute to a flourishing economy and set out actions that can achieve positive
changes in our places.
National Roads Development Guide 2014
19 This document supports Designing Streets and expands on its principles and is
the technical advice that should be followed in designing and approving of all
streets including parking provision.
Site History
20 No recent history of applications on the application site.
Consultations
21 As part of the planning application process the following bodies were consulted:
External
22 Scottish Water - No objection. Advise that there is capacity at the Water
Treatment Works, but no public waste water infrastructure locally. 
23 NatureScot - No objection.  River Tay Specialist has no comment on proposal.

Page 5

24 Scottish Environment Protection Agency - Object. Concerns over modelling of
flood risk from culverted watercourse to the northwest.
Internal
25 Transportation and Development - No objection. Conditions required in relation
to details of access and completion triggers.  
26 Development Contributions Officer - No developer contributions applicable to
this development.
27 Environmental Health (Noise Odour) - No objection. Conditions required to
cover noise and construction hours.
28 Environmental Health (Private Water) - No objection Conditions required to
safeguard existing supplies. Informative notes also recommended.
29 Community Waste Advisor - No objection to waste collection proposals.
30 Structures and Flooding - No objection. Conditions required to address the
location and flood risk.
Representations
31 80 representations were received, all objecting. The main issues raised are:
 Adverse effect on visual amenity
 Inappropriate housing density
 Inappropriate land use
 Excessive height
 Loss of sunlight or daylight
 Overlooking
 Flood risk
 Loss of trees
 Noise pollution
 Light pollution
 Out of character with the area
 Over Intensive development
 Road safety concerns
 Traffic congestion
 Impact on Loch/ecology/protected species
 Sewage odour and overloaded system
 Construction disturbance
 Littering
 No need for more accommodation
 Impact on private water supplies

Page 6

32 These issues are addressed below, with the exception of land ownership issues
(not in relation to certificates which agent has confirmed), loss of a view, existing
boathouse being subject to conservation order (it is not protected), impact on the
investments in the existing timeshares. The letters also raise issues related to the
impact or reduction of availability of hotel amenities which is not a planning
matter.
Additional Statements
33 Screening Opinion EIA Not Required
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA):
Environmental Report
Not Required
Appropriate Assessment under Habitats
Regulations
Habitats Regulations Appraisal
AA Not Required
Design Statement or Design and Access
Statement
Submitted
Report on Impact or Potential Impact e.g.
Flood Risk Assessment
Submitted – Drainage
Assessment, Flood Risk
Assessment, Preliminary
Ecological Assessment Report
Appraisal
34 Sections 25 and 37(2) of the Town & Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as
amended) require the determination of the proposal to be made in accordance
with the provisions of the Development Plan, unless material considerations
indicate otherwise.  The Development Plan comprises NPF4 and the Perth and
Kinross Local Development Plan 2019.  The relevant policy considerations are
outlined in the policy section above and are considered in more detail below.  In
terms of other material considerations, this involves considerations of the
Council’s other approved policies and supplementary guidance.
Principle
35 Loch Rannoch Hotel and its associated grounds are included within Kinloch
Rannoch’s settlement boundary, as defined in the Perth & Kinross Local
Development Plan 2 (PKLDP2). The PKLDP2 supports further sustainable
economic growth with the boundary containing Loch Rannoch Hotel, which is
zoned for tourism use.
36 The principle of development is also considered under NPF4 Policy 30 Tourism
along with LDP2 Policy 17 Residential areas (as the site is within the settlement
boundary) and Policy 9: Caravan Sites, Chalets and Timeshare Development.
37 NPF4 Policy 30 Tourism criterion a) supports proposals for extended tourist
facilities in locations identified within the LDP.  It further notes a number of

Page 7

criteria that will apply; that a contribution is made to the local economy, that the
use is compatible with the surrounding area, that it doesn’t detrimentally impact
communities, gives opportunities for sustainable travel, has accessibly for
disabled people, that measures are taken to minimise carbon emission and that
opportunities are provided for access to the natural environment. 
38 LDP2 Policy 17 supports tourism proposals within settlements where residential
amenity if protected and where development is compatible with the amenity and
character of the area.
39 LDP2 Policy 9C refers to chalet and timeshare/fractional ownership
developments and states that favourable consideration will be given where these
cannot be used as permanent residences. It goes on to provide criteria for
development proposals to satisfy and indicates that the expansion of an existing
hotel offering will be supported. The criteria requires that a proposal doesn’t
involve overdevelopment of a site or its setting and meets a specific need by
virtue of its quality or location in relation to existing tourism facilities.
40 In this instance the proposal involves an expansion of an existing well
established hotel offer and therefore the principle of extending the level of
accommodation across the wider site, given the facilities already available, is
considered acceptable and in accordance with the requirements of NPF4 and
LDP2. Condition 3 is recommended to ensure each unit is solely used as holiday
accommodation only and not as a permanent residence.
Design and Layout
41 The development is contained to the footprint of the existing marina buildings
which range from a large low pitch storage shed with single storey links to a 1 ½
storey boathouse.  The existing finishes of these buildings are a mix of timber
cladding, concrete, render and profiled sheet roofs.  The supporting statement
notes these buildings as redundant, but site visits indicate they are in use but
perhaps in need of improvement.
42 The proposal is to demolish these buildings and develop a single building.   This
containing 14 x one bedroomed units, 4 x two bedroomed units, 2 x three
bedroomed maisonette units and 2 x one bedroomed staff units. 
43 The proposed building has a large footprint over 4 floors, with 2 of the flats
accommodating an internal mezzanine. The roofline features a series of gables
bridged by a flat roof sections with a louvred wall finish.  The use of these gable-
ends and flat roof section, with associated material changes, has broken up what
could have been a large roof mass and gives the appearance of a series of
interlinked buildings.

Page 8

44 The south elevation faces the marina; it incorporates a raised ground floor deck
which working with site levels provides cycle storage underneath. This elevation
also features balconies to all 1st and 2nd floor units.   The north elevation faces
the public road, which sits at a higher level than the marina. Thus, from that
public road the building has a two-storey building appearance.  On the north
elevation an access platform will provide entry to the accommodation and
introduces an active frontage linking to the hotel, which lies elevated to the
northeast. In addition to a timber finish the building has an anthracite standing
seam roof, louvre and buff stone cladding. 
45 The resultant building is taller than the existing Marina buildings, but it is
considered the design and material finish, when combined with the rising existing
timeshare development which steps up the hillside, results in a development
which complements existing buildings and enhances the marina. 
46 As such, the proposal accords with NPF4 Policy 14 Design, quality and place,
and LDP2 Policies 1A and 1B Placemaking and the supplementary placemaking
guidance.
Landscape
47 The application site is within the Loch Rannoch and Glen Lyon National Scenic
Area (NSA), Loch Rannoch Special Protection Area (SPA) and the River Tay
Special Area of Conversation (SAC).
48 A Landscape Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) has not been requested as the
site has been previously developed and is set in front of existing built
development on the hillside, all of which is very prominent in the landscape.  The
proposal is also supported by a design statement, visualisations and detailed site
sections which are considered adequate in considering the impact of the
proposal on the landscape.  In addition, NatureScot have been consulted and
have not raised any landscape impact concerns.
49 The proposed building is on the footprint of existing buildings and, although the
development is higher, the design features a series of gables which reduces the
roof mass and the overall visual impact.  Additionally, the use of a natural
material palette, which is mainly timber, and the setting against the backdrop of
the white timeshares which extend up the hillside, all significantly reduces the
landscape impact.
50 The proposal is therefore considered to comply with Policy 38B National
Designations, Policy 39 Landscape of LDP2 and Policy 4 Natural Places of
NPF4.

Page 9

Residential Amenity
51 There is only one residential property, which lies to the west. The impact on the
amenity of this property has been taken into account.  However, it is noted that
the majority of objections are from owners of timeshare properties to the north. 
These units are in the same use as the proposal, holiday accommodation, and it
is thus considered that any noise from the operation of the lodges would not be
different to that which already exists as a result of the existing
holiday/tourist/hotel operations.
52 The existing dwelling to the west shares the access.  The intervening distance
between the new building and the dwelling is 35m and this is considered
adequate to mitigate any impacts from the proposed building in terms of
overlooking and overshadowing.
53 There is no supporting information supplied in relation to the proposed Air Source
Heat Pumps.  However, it is noted that these are to be located within the
enclosed stairwell of the building.  Given the distance and positioning internally,
acceptable levels should be achievable for airborne noise. The standard plant
noise condition is to be attached. (Condition 4)
54 As the development is for holiday accommodation units, there may be a
requirement for a licence under the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982
(Licensing of Short-term Lets) Order 2022. If a licence is required, noise
conditions will form part of the licence.  If a licence is not required, the applicant
should ensure that there is good management in place to control noise
generating activities, including user noise to ensure that residential amenity of
the neighbouring residential property is not affected.
55 Overall, the proposal is considered acceptable in terms of the residential amenity
of neighbouring properties in accordance with the placemaking policies 1A and
1B.
Light Pollution
56 Policy 55 of LDP2 states that consent will not be granted for proposals where
lighting would result in obtrusive or intrusive effects. The plans indicate low level
Lighting, but to ensure that the details are fully agreed with an appropriate
scheme a condition is recommended (Condition 15).
Roads and Access
57 The applicant is proposing to provide 24 cycle lockers under the decking areas at
the front of the apartment blocks.  A condition is recommended to ensure their
installation prior to completion or the first use of the units. (Condition 18)

Page 10

58 The development will have 24 car parking spaces, two of which are of ‘disabled’
design.  Additional car parking is also available at the hotel car park, which will
be linked via a new footway or through the new level access from the B846 to the
upper floors.
59 The new footway route goes to the car park along the edge of the public road
and includes a number of structures that may impact the route, although an
indicative design has been submitted.  A detailed design, showing the
construction of the footpath, shall be provided prior to the commencement of
works on site. (Condition 19)
60 The applicant is proposing to undertake works to the vehicle access, a diagram
to show the visibility splay has been provided - 70 metres left and right.  A
condition is recommended to ensure its implementation. (Condition 17)
61 As such, the current proposal is acceptable in terms of roads and access,
according with NPF4 Policy 13: Sustainable transport and LDP2 Policy 60B:
Transport Standards and Accessibility Requirements: New Development
Proposals.
Construction Period
62 With a project of this scale and within a remote rural location construction
impacts must be considered.  However, all developments have a level of impact
during construction, and this is not the same as long-term impacts of the end
development/use.  In this case it is considered that a Construction Traffic
Management Plan should be put in place to mitigate and manage potential
impacts (Condition 16).  In addition, construction hours can be controlled to limit
the hours of noisy work (Condition 5)
Drainage and Flooding
Flooding
63 The application site forms part of the hotel complex and within the same wider
Class 7 Hotel Use.  The original reason for consultation to SEPA was due to the
map layers showing flood risk from Loch Rannoch.  Through the submission of
additional information including finished floor levels the loch flood risk was
addressed. However, an unnamed burn to the northwest required further
consideration. 
64 The modelled/theoretical flood extents for a 1 in 200 year + climate change event
indicate that most of the site is at flood risk from the western watercourse, which
is culverted at two points.  This risk whether there is a structural blockage or not.
The western watercourse is not fully within the applicant’s land ownership and
the culverted section(s) fall within the adjacent timeshare development (not

Page 11

owned by the applicant).  SEPA state that this implies that the site is not suitable
for this development under Policy 22 of NPF4, as the development type is not
considered to be an exception under Policy 22 (a) and is within the flood risk
area.  
65 The proposals existing and proposed use class is considered to be, Class 7:
Hotel as it forms part of the Loch Rannoch Hotel complex.  The applicant has
also provided further information in relation to the existing use of the site and has
shown that two existing ground floor units have been used as staff
accommodation.  In terms of NPF4 Policy 22 (a) it is thus considered that the
proposal would fall under part iii) of the policy, as it is the redevelopment of an
existing building or site for an equal or less vulnerable use.  SEPA state that this
application would increase the overnight room use to 20 units and that
redevelopments are an opportunity to reduce risk as far as possible.  Due to the
increase in vulnerability, taken to mean the intensity of use, they consider that
the flood risk area must be avoided. 
66 Policy 22 however refers to equal or less vulnerable uses, not intensification of
use. In this case the development encompasses the same footprint of building as
the existing and measures have been put in place in terms of finished floor levels
to reduce the risk.
67 As part of proposals, a flood water channel raised along the access road into the
site had been suggested to divert flood water however this would not be
supported by SEPA and could see issues in relation to proximity to the public
road.  However, it is still considered that further details on road construction
could be conditioned to provide enhanced drainage (Condition 21).
68 The council Flood Team have reviewed the SEPA consultation responses and
confirm that they have no objection to the proposals.  They consider it to meet
Policy 22 (a) (iii) redevelopment of an existing site for an equal or less vulnerable
use. They request that measures are put in place due to the flood risk. These
include flood plans, flood resilient materials and the measures set out in the FRA
which included that all proposed development is set at a minimum level of
208.9m AOD, providing a suitable freeboard above the estimated flood level.
Flood mitigation measures such as raising of electronics, sealing of cable entry
points, and use of robust construction materials should all be considered and this
is set out in recommended conditions. (Condition 7, 8 and 9).  Whilst it is
accepted that SEPA object on the basis of NPF4 Policy 22, it is considered that
the proposals meet the policy requirements and that flood risk issues can be
addressed via design and conditions with no increased vulnerable use
introduced.  As such it is considered that there is no conflict with NPF4 Policy 22.

Page 12

Foul drainage
69 The majority of representations raise the issue of odour from the existing
drainage system and lack of capacity.  The sewage maintenance costs at the site
are split 69/31 between LRHC and the Hotel (including all leisure facilities). 
However, this seems to be an existing issue rather than one caused or which
would be automatically exacerbated by the proposal.
70 The submitted Drainage Impact Assessment (DIA) has confirmed that the smell
experienced related to a specific problem that would be resolved with a full
emptying and replacement of the “active sludge”.  The smell is not due to current
capacity.
71 For the proposed apartments, the drainage consultant has recommended a new
treatment plant. This is to be located beside the existing system to the east of the
new building. A plan has been provided to show the location.
72 An open SUDS pond would not be an option, so the proposal is to install storage
beneath the new parking areas. To provide suitable stability it is proposed to use
Polystorm Cellular Storage crates, or similar approved, to manage the runoff
from both the building and parking areas.
73 As such, it is considered that the proposal accords with the intent of NPF4 Policy
22 Flood risk and water management and LDP2 Water Environment and
Drainage Policies 53B Foul Drainage, 53C Surface Water Drainage, and 53E
Water Supply.
Waste Collection
74 The site is already served by a waste collection service and a bin storage area is
shown on the plans, adjacent to the B846. The construction of a new bin storage
area and collection point will require consents to be in place to tie into the public
road network for the construction of the vehicle access.
Natural Heritage and Biodiversity
75 A Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Report (PEAR), which included a summer site
visit, has been submitted in support of the application. 
76 In respect of protected species, the types of buildings on site are not commonly
used for roosting bats and have low potential. The site furthermore has low
potential for other mammals, but could be a commuting habitat.  There are otter
records within 2km and the foreshore provides suitable transitory and commuting
habitat.  The PEAR notes a number of mitigation measures for protected species,
including: scheduling works to avoid otter breeding season, etc. This can be
covered in a condition for a Construction Method Statement CMS (Condition 12).

Page 13

There are also a number of Biodiversity Enhancements suggested within the
PEAR and this can be covered by condition. (Condition 13)
77 The site otherwise comprises of a large area of hardstanding and grassland. 
There are trees on the perimeter, two centrally positioned trees (birch and rowan)
are to be removed and a number of others (mainly ash with extensive dieback)
on the periphery are to be felled.  The new drainage system (which is essential)
may have an impact on a further two trees, Condition 14 is recommended to
ensure that prior to the commencement of development further information about
these trees is provided and an approach agreed.
78 The site falls within a blanket Ancient Woodland zoning, however site specific
review of the area affected has found that it has been extensively developed in
the past.  With the areas proposed to be developed having seen disturbance,
such that they would not in themselves qualify as ‘Ancient Woodland’. The
building is within existing building footprints and the proposed carpark impacts an
area of managed grass/lawn. The trees to be felled are birch, rowan and ash
(with dieback) and their removal is not considered to have any significant impact
on ‘ancient woodland’ or the wider blanket designation, which also incorporates
the wider hotel and timeshare complex. This as it is considered that the site in
itself does not qualify as Ancient Woodland, nor would any ancient or veteran
trees be affected.  In addition, there would be no negative ecological impacts,
with biodiversity enhancements and compensatory tree planting secured via
Condition 13.
79 The proposal complies with LDP2 Policy 40 and 41 and Policy 3 and 6 of NPF4
subject to the inclusion of conditions to protect trees and secure biodiversity
enhancement.
Developer Contributions
80 There are no developer contributions applicable to the site.
Economic Impact
81 The proposal provides additional tourist accommodation increasing the choice of
accommodation at the hotel and potential employment opportunities. This is likely
to create a positive economic impact. There is also likely to be some short-term
economic gain from the construction phase of the development.
Variation of Application Under Section 32a
82 This application was varied prior to determination, in accordance with the terms
of section 32A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as
amended.  The variations incorporate changes to provide an additional septic
tank within the site.

Page 14

Planning Obligations and Legal Agreements
83 None required.
Direction by Scottish Ministers
84 Under the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure)
(Scotland) Regulations 2013, regulations 30 – 33 there have been no directions
by the Scottish Government in respect of an Environmental Impact Assessment
screening opinion, call in or notification relating to this application.
Conclusion and Reasons for Recommendation
85 To conclude, the application must be determined in accordance with the
Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this
respect, the proposal is considered to comply with NPF4, and the adopted Local
Development Plan 2 (2019).  Account has been taken account of the relevant
material considerations, and none has been found that would justify overriding
the Development Plan.
86 Accordingly the proposal is recommended for approval subject to the following
conditions.  Although this will require a referral to Scottish Ministers, given the
objection from a statutory consultee (SEPA).
Recommendation 
Approve the application
Conditions and Reasons for Recommendation
1. This planning permission will last only for three years from the date of this
decision notice, unless the development has been lawfully started within that
period.
Reason - This is a Planning Permission in terms of Section 58 of the Town and
Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as amended by Section 32 of the
Planning (Scotland) Act 2019.
2. The development hereby approved must be carried out in accordance with the
approved drawings and documents, unless otherwise provided for by conditions
imposed by this decision notice.
Reason - To ensure the development is carried out in accordance with the
approved drawings and documents.

Page 15

3. The development hereby approved shall be used solely for holiday
accommodation and shall not be occupied as the sole or main residence of any
occupant.
Reason - In order to clarify the terms of the permission; to control and restrict the
use of the building.
4. All plant or equipment shall be so enclosed, attenuated and/or maintained such
that any noise therefrom shall not exceed Noise Rating 35 between 0700 and
2300 hours daily, or Noise Rating 20 between 2300 and 0700 hours daily, within
any neighbouring residential property, with all windows slightly open, when
measured and/ or calculated and plotted on a rating curve chart.
Reason - In order to safeguard the neighbouring residential amenity in the area.
5. Construction work shall be limited to Monday to Friday 0700 hours to 1900 hours
and Saturday 0800 hours to 1300 hours with no noisy works out with these times
or at any time on Sundays or bank holidays (as identified by Scottish
Government).
Reason - In order to safeguard the residential amenity of the area.
6. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, details of the
location and measures proposed for the safeguarding and continued operation,
or replacement, of any septic tanks and soakaways, private water sources,
private water supply storage facilities and/or private water supply pipes serving
properties in the vicinity, sited within and running through the application site,
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as Planning
Authority.  The subsequently agreed protective or replacement measures shall
be put in place prior to the commencement of the development being brought
into use and shall thereafter be so maintained insofar as it relates to the
development hereby approved.
Reason - To ensure existing water and drainage infrastructures are not
compromised.
7. The development hereby approved shall be constructed so as to be flood
resilient in order to reduce the extent of potential flood damage and thereby
reduce repair costs and speed up building restoration should a flood event occur.
Reason - The site is located within the 1/200 (0.5% AEP) flood extent and
therefore has a medium to high risk of flooding.
8. Prior to the commencement of development a Flood Action Plan shall be
prepared for the site and submitted for the agreement in writing of the Planning
Authority in consultation with the Council's Structures and Flooding Section.  This
should detail access and egress arrangements during a flooding event.

Page 16

Reason - The site is located within the 1/200 (0.5% AEP) flood extent and
therefore has a medium to high risk of flooding.
9. The measures identified in the Flood Risk Assessment to prevent flooding of the
site, approved as part of this permission, shall be fully implemented. Verification
that the scheme has been fully implemented must be submitted to the Council as
Planning Authority prior to completion or the bringing into use of any part of the
development, whichever is the earlier.
Reason - The site is located within the 1/200 (0.5% AEP) flood extent and
therefore has a medium to high risk of flooding.
10. Storm water drainage from all paved surfaces, including the access, shall be
disposed of by means of suitable Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems to meet
the requirements of best management practices.
Reason - To ensure the provision of effective drainage for the site.
11. Prior to commencement of development a detailed plan for the installation of the
new foul drainage system shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the
Council as Planning Authority.  The plan shall include tree protection measures,
any tree removal details and arboricultural assessment if required.  The plan as
agreed shall be fully implemented as part of the planning permission.
Reason - To ensure the provision of effective drainage for the site and to protect
existing trees.
12. Development shall not commence until a detailed Construction Method
Statement (CMS) has been submitted to the Council as Planning Authority and
agreed in writing.  The CMS must identify measures to prevent harmful materials
entering the River Tay SAC, which could reduce water quality and lead to a
damaging impact on the salmon, otter and lamprey interests.  The CMS should
include the following:
(a) pollution prevention safeguards including drainage arrangements and the
possible use of siltation traps, settlement tanks and bunds
(b) storage and disposal of materials including the siting of stock piles, use of
buffer strips and disposal methods.
(c) construction site facilities including extent and location of construction site
huts, vehicles, equipment, fuel, chemicals and materials compound
(d) timing, duration and phasing of construction particularly in relation to otter
breeding season.
The CMS and mitigations as agreed shall be fully implemented as part of the
planning permission.

Page 17

Reason - In order to ensure the development does not impact negatively on the
nearby Special Area of Conservation.
13. Prior to the commencement of development a biodiversity enhancement and new
tree planting scheme reflective of the conclusions and recommended action
points within the Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Report (PEAR) Biodiversity Net
Gains enhancements submitted (by ROAVR dated August 2023 plan ref 18
relates) shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Council as Planning
Authority.  The scheme as agreed shall be fully adhered to, respected and
undertaken as part of the construction phase of development, to the satisfaction
of the Council as Planning Authority.
Reason - In the interests of protecting environmental quality and of biodiversity.
14. Prior to the commencement of any works on site, all trees on site (other than
those marked for felling on the approved plans or those agreed under condition
11) and those which have Root Protection Areas which fall within the site shall be
retained and protected. Protection methods shall be strictly in accordance with
BS 5837 2012: Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction. 
Protection measures, once in place, shall remain in place for the duration of
construction.
Reason - In the interests of visual amenity and to ensure the satisfactory
implementation of the proposed planting scheme.
15. Prior to the installation of any external lighting, the details of all external lighting
shall be submitted for the written agreement of the Council as Planning Authority.
The scheme shall include details of light spill, brightness of the lighting and the
proposed hours of operation.  The agreed lighting scheme shall be implemented
and maintained in full accordance with the agreed scheme.
Reason - In order to safeguard the residential amenity of the area.
16. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, the applicant
shall submit for the further written agreement of the Council as Planning
Authority, in consultation with the Roads Authority (Structures), a Construction
Traffic Management Scheme (TMS) which shall include the following:
(a) restriction of construction traffic to approved routes and the measures to be
put in place to avoid other routes being used;
(b) timing of construction traffic to minimise impact on local communities
particularly at school start and finishing times, on days when re-fuse
collection is undertaken, on Sundays and during local events;
(c) a code of conduct for HGV drivers to allow for queuing traffic to pass;
(d) arrangements for liaison with the Roads Authority regarding winter
maintenance;

Page 18

(e) emergency arrangements detailing communication and contingency
arrangements in the event of vehicle breakdown;
(f) arrangements for the cleaning of wheels and chassis of vehicles to prevent
material from construction sites associated with the development being
deposited on the road;
(g) arrangements for cleaning of roads affected by material deposited from
construction sites associated with the development;
(h) arrangements for signage at site accesses and crossovers and on roads to
be used by construction traffic in order to provide safe access for
pedestrians, cyclists and equestrians;
(i) details of information signs to inform other road users of construction traffic;
(j) arrangements to ensure that access for emergency service vehicles are not
impeded;
(k) co-ordination with other significant developments known to use roads
affected by construction traffic;
(l) traffic arrangements in the immediate vicinity of temporary construction
compounds;
(m) monitoring, reporting and implementation arrangements;
(n) arrangements for dealing with non-compliance; and
(o) details of HGV movements to and from the site. 
The TMS as approved shall be strictly adhered to during the entire site
construction programme.
Reason - In the interest of proper site management.
17. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, full visibility
splays of 70 metres along the channel line shall be provided to the left and right
of the access, at a set-back of 2.4 metres measured 1.05m above the road level
to the standard and specification required by the Council as Roads Authority to
the satisfaction of the Planning Authority.  The visibility splays shall be physically
formed on the ground and any existing fences, walls, hedges or other means of
enclosure or obstruction, including signs, within the splays greater than 1.05
metres in height shall be removed and relocated outwith the splays.  Once
formed, the visibility splays shall be permanently retained thereafter, and no
visual obstruction above 1.05 metres of any kind shall be permitted within the
visibility splays so formed.
Reason - In the interests of road safety; to ensure an acceptable standard of
construction within the public road boundary.
18. Prior to the development hereby approved being completed or brought into use,
the car parking, motorcycle parking and cycle parking as shown on the approved
plans, shall be implemented in accordance with the approved de-tails to the
satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority.  Once provided, the car, motor
cycle and cycle parking shall thereafter be permanently retained as such.

Page 19

Reason - To ensure a suitable level of off street car and motor cycle parking for
the development and to encourage active travel and meet advice within Scottish
Planning Policy on transport.
19. Prior to commencement of any development on site, a detailed design showing
the construction of the footpath, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Planning Authority in consultation with the Roads Authority.  The footpath, as
approved in writing, shall be implemented in accordance with the approved
details to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority and undertaken
prior to the commencement of construction associated with this planning
application (23/01101/FLL).
Reason - In the interests of road safety; to ensure an acceptable standard of
construction adjacent to the public road network
20. Prior to the development hereby approved being completed or brought into use,
the vehicular access for the bin collection area shall be formed in accordance
with Drawing Number 03.  The vehicle access shall be of Type A Road
construction detail for Access Types A and B.
Reason - In the interests of road safety; to ensure an acceptable standard of
construction within the public road boundary.
21. Prior to commencement of any development on site, a detailed design showing
the road drainage of the access road to the south of the B846 shall be submitted
to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with the
Roads Authority and Flood Team.  The details as approved in writing, shall be
implemented in accordance with the approved details to the satisfaction of the
Council as Planning Authority and undertaken prior to the commencement of
construction associated with this planning application
Reason - The site is located within the 1/200 (0.5% AEP) flood extent and
therefore has a medium to high risk of flooding.
Justification
The proposal is in accordance with the Development Plan and there are no
material reasons which justify departing from the Development Plan.
Procedural Notes
This report recommends approval of the application as the development is
considered to comply with the relevant provisions of the Development Plan. 
SEPA however maintain an objection, and as a statutory consultee any approval
would need to be referred to Scottish Ministers.

Page 20

Informatives
1. Records indicate that at least part of the proposed development site lies within a
radon affected area where the measurement/monitoring of radon gas and the
installation of mitigation measures may be required.
Further information on radon gas and the associated reports that can be obtained
is available at www.ukradon.org and at http://shop.bgs.ac.uk/georeports/.
2. Under Section 27A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as
amended) the person undertaking the development is required to give the
Planning Authority prior written notification of the date on which it is intended to
commence the development.  A failure to comply with this statutory requirement
would constitute a breach of planning control under Section 123(1) of that Act,
which may result in enforcement action being taken.  Please use the form
attached herewith.
3. As soon as practicable after the development is complete, the person who
completes the development is obliged by Section 27B of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended) to give the Planning Authority written
notice of that position.  Please use the form attached herewith.
4. No work shall be commenced until an application for building warrant has been
submitted and approved.
5. Part of the approved development includes holiday accommodation or Short-term
Let accommodation (STL).  The developer is advised that holiday
accommodation and STLs require to be licensed under the terms of Article 3 of
the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Short-terms Lets) Order
2021 and therefore a licence application should be made to Perth and Kinross
Council prior to operation commencing.  Further information and application
forms are available at https://www.pkc.gov.uk/shorttermlets.
6. The applicant should ensure that any existing wayleaves for maintenance or
repair to existing private water supply or septic drainage infrastructure in the
development area are honoured throughout and after completion of the
development.
7. The applicant shall ensure the private water supply for the dwellinghouse/
development complies with the Water Scotland Act 1980 (Section 63), The
Private Water Supplies (Scotland) Regulations 2006 and The Water Intended for
Human Consumption (Private Supplies) (Scotland) Regulations 2017.  Detailed
information regarding the private water supply, including the nature, location and
adequacy of the source, any storage tanks/ pipework and the filtration and
disinfection treatment proposed to ensure provision of an adequate and

Page 21

consistently wholesome water supply shall be submitted to Perth and Kinross
Council Environmental Health in line with the above Act and Regulations.
8. The applicant is advised to refer to Perth & Kinross Council's Supplementary
Guidance on Flood Risk and Flood Risk Assessments 2021 as it contains advice
relevant to your development. https://www.pkc.gov.uk/ldp2floodrisk
9. The applicant can seek guidance on the detailed design and positioning of the
cycle storage from Transport Scotland's Cycling by Design 2021 or similar design
guide. 
10. The applicant is advised that, in terms of Sections 56 of the Roads (Scotland) Act
1984, he/she/they must obtain from the Council, as Roads Authority, consent to
open an existing road or footway prior to the commencement of works. 
Information on junction types, requirements for Vehicular Access consents (VA1)
and application forms are available at www.pkc.gov.uk/vehicleaccess.  Advice on
the disposal of surface water should be sought at the initial stages of design from
Scottish Water and the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency.
Letters of representation 80
Authors
Name Designation Contact Details
Joanne Ferguson Planning Officer 01738 475300
developmentmanagement@pkc.gov.uk
Approved
Name Designation Date
Kristian Smith Service Manager 27 February 2025