Democracy Spraffa

26/00267/Fll

Perth and Kinross Council · 14 October 2026
Back to Planning and Placemaking Committee — 14 October 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Perth and Kinross Council 
Planning and Placemaking Committee - 14 October 2026 
Report of Handling by Development Management and Building Standards Service
Manager
(Report No. 26/284) 
Proposal: Erection of 42 flats and associated works 
Location: Former Moncreiffe Care Home, Main Street, Bridge of Earn, Perth, PH2
9PJ 
Ref. No: 26/00267/FLL
Ward No: P9 - Almond and Earn 
Summary 
This report recommends approval of the application as the development is considered
to comply with the relevant provisions of the Development Plan and there are no
material considerations apparent which outweigh the Development Plan. 
Background And Description Of Proposal 
1. The application site is approximately 0.7 hectares in size and is situated at the
northern end of Main Street in the settlement of Bridge of Earn. The site is
brownfield land following the demolition of the buildings associated with a former
care home (Building Warrant Reference 22/01299/NDOM5). 
2. The site is relatively flat and gradually slopes down on the north boundary,
northeast corner and the east boundary. There are trees and bushes on the
northern and western boundaries of the site. The central area of the site is
populated with vegetation, tarmac and rubble. Temporary security fencing is
present around the site perimeter. 
3. The site is bound by a holiday lodge development to the north, Dark Walk to the
south, to the east is Back Street and to the west is Main Street. Residential
properties are located to the immediate northeast, east and south of the
application site and on the opposite side of Main Street (west). 
4. Southwest of the site are commercial units comprising retail and takeaway
fronting Main Street. To the west, on the opposite side of Main Street, is a garage
with the forecourt approved for a change of use to a petrol filling station
(26/00060/FLL).

Page 2

5. A development of five blocks of 42 flats is proposed comprising of 41 2-bedroom
flats and a ground floor 1-bedroom accessible flat. The five blocks are positioned
on the boundary of the site around a central area of amenity space and car
parking. Two 3-storey blocks front Main Street (18 flats), a stepped 3-storey and
2-storey block (10 flats) is located on the north boundary and a 2-storey block
and a stepped 3-storey and 2-storey block (14 flats) on the east boundary. 
6. External finishes have been revised during the application process and include
Strathstone Walling (Plum) and dry dash render walls (Ashton Cream) with
UPVC windows and composite doors (Anthracite Grey) (Drawing 62).   
7. Access to the site will utilise an existing vehicular access at the north end of the
site. A central area of parking is proposed with 42 spaces. Waste storage,
amenity planting, sustainable urban drainage and cycle storage are proposed in
the central area. 
8. Footpaths are planned to connect the site to Main Street, the core path to the
east (EARN/8, 42/8 Riverside Path) and to the south a footpath is proposed on
the north side of Dark Walk, to improve pedestrian connectivity. 
9. A revised Arboricultural Assessment (Drawing 49) notes there are eighteen trees
on site and thirteen are to be removed to enable the development with five trees
retained on the north boundary. A landscape plan shows tree, shrub, wildflower
and hedgerow planting to compensate for tree loss and enhance visual amenity
and biodiversity. Further biodiversity enhancement is proposed through the
installation of swift bricks and bat boxes (Drawing 41). 
10. The site has been identified in the Council’s Strategic Housing Investment Plan
(SHIP) for affordable housing. The Council is looking to take ownership of the
properties upon completion to deliver social rented affordable housing.   
11. This application was varied prior to determination, in accordance with the terms
of section 32A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as
amended.  The variations incorporate changes to the material finish of the flats,
the addition of a footpath on Dark Walk and changes to the layout of the central
area of parking, waste storage and cycle storage. 
Site History 
12. 92/00943/FUL Full Planning Permission was Refused on 2 September 1992 for
Erection of 8/12 sheltered flats (in outline) 
13. 93/01061/FUL Full Planning Permission was Approved on 15 October 1993 for
Erection of 10 additional bedrooms 
14. 08/00976/OUT was Approved on 15 January 2009 for Erection of a 2 storey 25
bedroom extension with ancillary rooms and additional parking (in outline)

Page 3

15. 08/01350/FUL Full Planning Permission was Approved on 17 December 2008 for
Extension to Nursing Home to Form Porch and Ramp Access 
16. 09/01156/AML was Approved on 17 May 2010 for Erection of a 2 storey 22
bedroom extension with ancillary rooms (reserved matters) 
17. 09/01334/FLL Full Planning Permission was Approved on 7 December 2009 for
Demolition of derelict store building and erection of a new single storey building 
18. 22/01324/PND on 23 September 2022 for Demolition of buildings 
Environmental Impact Assessment 
19. An EIA is not required. 
Pre-Application Consultation 
20. Pre-application Reference: 25/00019/PREAPL  
21. The proposed development is not classed as a Major development in terms of
the Town and Country Planning (Hierarchy of Developments) (Scotland)
Regulations 2009, therefore the applicant was not required to undertake not any
formal pre-application consultation with the local community. 
Development Plan 
22. The Development Plan for the area comprises National Planning Framework 4
and the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) along with its
associated statutory supplementary guidance. 
National Planning Framework 4 
23. The National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is the Scottish Government’s long-
term spatial strategy with a comprehensive set of national planning policies. 
This strategy sets out how to improve people’s lives by making sustainable,
liveable and productive spaces.  NPF4 has an increased status over previous
NPFs and comprises part of the statutory development plan. 
24. The Council’s assessment of this application has considered the following
policies of NPF4: 
• Policy 1: Tackling the Climate and Nature Crises
• Policy 2: Climate Mitigation and Adaptation
• Policy 3: Biodiversity
• Policy 4: Natural Places
• Policy 6: Forestry, Woodland and Trees
• Policy 9: Brownfield, Vacant and Derelict Land and Empty Buildings
• Policy 13: Sustainable Transport

Page 4

• Policy 14: Design, Quality and Place
• Policy 15: Local Living and 20 Minute Neighbourhoods
• Policy 16: Quality Homes
• Policy 18: Infrastructure First
• Policy 20: Blue and Green Infrastructure
• Policy 22: Flood Risk and Water Management
• Policy 23: Health and Safety 
Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2019 
25. The Local Development Plan 2 (2019) (LDP2) sets out a vision statement for the
area and states that, “Our vision is of a Perth and Kinross which is dynamic,
attractive and effective which protects its assets whilst welcoming population and
economic growth.” It is the most recent statement of Council policy and is
augmented by Supplementary Guidance. 
26. The principal relevant policies are, in summary: 
• Policy 1A: Placemaking
• Policy 1B: Placemaking
• Policy 2: Design Statements
• Policy 5: Infrastructure Contributions
• Policy 15: Public Access
• Policy 17: Residential Areas
• Policy 20: Affordable Housing
• Policy 32: Embedding Low & Zero Carbon Generating Technologies in New
Development
• Policy 40B: Forestry, Woodland and Trees: Trees, Woodland and
Development
• Policy 41: Biodiversity
• Policy 42: Green Infrastructure
• Policy 52: New Development and Flooding
• Policy 53B: Water Environment and Drainage: Foul Drainage
• Policy 53C: Water Environment and Drainage: Surface Water Drainage
• Policy 56: Noise Pollution
• Policy 58A: Contaminated and Unstable Land: Contaminated Land
• Policy 60A: Transport Standards and Accessibility Requirements: Existing
Infrastructure
• Policy 60B: Transport Standards and Accessibility Requirements: New
Development Proposals 
Statutory Supplementary Guidance
27.
• Supplementary Guidance - Developer Contributions & Affordable
Housing (adopted in 2023)

Page 5

• Supplementary Guidance - Flood Risk and Flood Risk Assessments
(adopted in 2021)
• Supplementary Guidance - Forest & Woodland Strategy (adopted in 2020)
• Supplementary Guidance - Green & Blue Infrastructure (adopted in 2020)
• Supplementary Guidance - Open Space Provision for New Developments
(adopted in 2021)
• Supplementary Guidance - Placemaking (adopted in 2020) 
Other Material Considerations 
PKC Non-Statutory Guidance
28.
• Planning Guidance - Planning & Biodiversity
• Supplementary Guidance - Renewable & Low Carbon Energy (draft) 
National Guidance 
29. The Scottish Government expresses its planning policies through Planning
Notes, Creating Places, Designing Streets, National Roads Development Guide
and a series of Circulars in addition to NPF4. Those relevant are listed below. 
Planning Advice Notes 
30. The following Scottish Government Planning Advice Notes (PANs) and Guidance
Documents are of relevance to the proposal: 
Creating Places 2013 
31. Creating Places is the Scottish Government’s policy statement on architecture
and place. It sets out the comprehensive value good design can deliver. It notes
that successful places can unlock opportunities, build vibrant communities and
contribute to a flourishing economy and set out actions that can achieve positive
changes in our places. 
Designing Streets 2010 
32. Designing Streets is the policy statement in Scotland for street design and
changes the emphasis of guidance on street design towards place-making and
away from a system focused upon the dominance of motor vehicles. It was
created to support the Scottish Government’s place-making agenda, alongside
Creating Places. 
National Roads Development Guide 2014 
33. This document supports Designing Streets and expands on its principles and is
the technical advice that should be followed in designing and approving of all
streets including parking provision.

Page 6

Local Place Plans 
34. Local Place Plans are community-led plans setting out proposals for the
development and use of land and set out a community’s aspirations for its future
development. The application site does not lie within an area with a Local Place
Plan. 
Consultations 
35. As part of the planning application process the following bodies were consulted: 
External 
36. Perth and Kinross Heritage Trust - Given the site's development history and
change of building etc over the last 150 years it’s likely the ground has been
heavily landscaped, and any potential archaeology (i.e the trackway/road)
associated with the old bridge (SM9468) is very low.  Therefore, with respect to
archaeology and the planning process, as outlined by NPF4, the proposed
development does not raise any significant issues. No archaeological mitigation
is required in this instance. 
37. Scottish Environment Protection Agency – A holding objection was received
and this was removed following the submission of further information and subject
to the following condition - The finished floor levels of the development shall be
set no lower than 8.09m AOD, in accordance with the levels specified by
Fairhurst in their email to SEPA dated 28 April 2026 on the planning record and
the Fairhurst Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) (dated October 2025), ensuring a
minimum freeboard of 600mm is achieved. 
38. Scottish Water - No objection. Scottish Water records indicate that there is live
infrastructure in the proximity of the development area that may impact on
existing Scottish Water assets.   
39. Earn Community Council – Objection. While recognising the need for
affordable housing, it is considered that the design scale and density is excessive
for the location at the entrance to Bridge of Earn.  Cross reference was also
made to previous refusals on site almost twenty years ago which reflected these
issues.  Furthermore, there was also concern that the level of parking is
adequate for the proposals, and that there could be an unacceptable impact on
the local road network and upon infrastructure such as education, and
healthcare. 
Internal 
40. Environmental Health (Contaminated Land) - Contamination condition for
further reports to be submitted for written approval of PKC. 
41. Structures and Flooding - No objection. Follows an update which was
requested to calculations in the Flood Risk Assessment.

Page 7

42. Biodiversity - The submitted supporting information was revised and is in
accordance with legislation, policy and guidance. Conditions recommended to
ensure the recommendations of the Ecological Assessment Report are
undertaken together with the proposed biodiversity enhancement. 
43. Planning Enforcement Officer (Trees) - Satisfied with the updated Tree Survey
report and revised landscape plans, no further comment. 
44. Transportation and Development – No objection, conditions recommended.
The increased car parking on site from the original proposals, upgraded footway
links, cycle parking, bus stop improvements and footways around the site are all
aimed at minimising the impact of the development on the road network and
promoting active travel. 
45. Housing Strategy - The proposal is for 42 flats on a brownfield site at Bridge of
Earn, all of which will be affordable housing. This satisfies Policy 20: Affordable
Housing, which requires 25% of any residential proposal to contribute towards
the Council’s affordable housing targets. Following detailed consideration of
demand and need, we can advise that Perth & Kinross Council is content to
accept the proposed two-bedroomed flatted units across the development.  This
takes into account and fairly reflects evidenced need and demand for affordable
homes in this community. PKC will assess a wide range of affordable housing
tenures, including intermediate rent and low-cost home ownership, to ensure that
an optimal and appropriate housing mix is in place. 
46. Development Contributions Officer – Transport Infrastructure contribution
required at affordable rate in line with Supplementary Guidance. 
47. Community Waste Advisor - Environment Service – Advised on the waste
storage requirements for the development. 
Representations 
48. Forty-seven (47) representations were received in total - two general comments
and forty-five objections including an objection from Earn Community Council. 
49. The main issues raised within the representations include: 
• Visual impact – highly visible site on entrance into Bridge of Earn
• Design, scale, height and massing are not in keeping with the character of
the area
• Detrimental impact on residential amenity – overbearing, loss of privacy,
overlooking, loss of daylight
• Lack of parking proposed in the site 
• On street parking – development will exacerbate the existing issue
• Road safety
• Increased traffic
• Impact on local road network

Page 8

• Contrary to Development Plan
• Loss of trees 
• Impact on biodiversity
• Flood Risk
• Density - overdevelopment of site
• Constraints on infrastructure 
50. These issues are addressed in the Appraisal section of the report. 
51. Other issues raised in the representations which cannot be specifically
addressed through this planning application process includes the capacity of the
school and the closure of the GP surgery with no replacement service. From a
planning perspective, these local issues will be considered as part of LDP3.
Whilst the planning system can help to influence and deliver physical
infrastructure, issues over staffing levels are a matter for the NHS to address. 
Additional Statements 
Screening Opinion EIA not required 
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA):
Environmental Report
not required 
Appropriate Assessment under Habitats
Regulations
Habitats Regulations Appraisal -
AA not required 
Design Statement or Design and Access
Statement
submitted 
Report on Impact or Potential Impact eg
Flood Risk Assessment
submitted 
Appraisal 
52. Sections 25 and 37(2) of the Town & Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as
amended) require the determination of the proposal to be made in accordance
with the provisions of the Development Plan, unless material considerations
indicate otherwise.  The Development Plan comprises NPF4, the Perth and
Kinross Local Development Plan 2019 and statutory supplementary guidance.
The relevant policy considerations are outlined in the policy section above and
are considered in more detail below. 
53. In terms of other material considerations, this involves consideration of the
Council’s other approved policies and supplementary guidance - this includes the
Strategic Housing Investment Plan (SHIP). Also, consideration of national
planning guidance and policies and this includes letters from the Scottish
Governments Chief Planner about the housing crisis.   
Policy 
54. In respect of NPF4, key policies for consideration include Policy 1 (Tackling the
Climate and Nature Crises) and Policy 2 (Climate Mitigation and Adaptation)

Page 9

which look to ensure that all new developments take into account climate change
and its implications. Policy 3 (Biodiversity) seeks to ensure that new
developments provide a proportionate level of biodiversity enhancements. Policy
9 (Brownfield, Vacant and Derelict Land and Empty Buildings) promotes the
reuse of brownfield land to help reduce the need for greenfield development.
Policy 13 (Sustainable Transport) aims to reduce the need to travel
unsustainably. Policy 14 (Design, Quality and Place) promotes a high standard of
design for all new development, Policy 15 (Local Living and 20 minute
Neighbourhoods) promotes a network of high quality, accessible, connected and
compact neighbourhoods and Policy 16 (Quality Homes) encourages, promotes
and facilitates the delivery of more high quality, affordable and sustainable
homes, in the right locations. Policy 20 (Blue and Green Infrastructure) looks to
protect and enhance blue and green infrastructure through suitable designs.
Policy 22 (Flood Risk and Water Management) aims to strengthen resilience to
flood risk by promoting avoidance as a first principle and reducing the
vulnerability of existing and future development to flooding. 
55. In respect of LDP2, the key policies for consideration which align with the NPF4
policies above include Policy 1 (Placemaking), Policy 17 (Residential Areas),
Policy 20 (Affordable Housing), Policy 32 (Embedding Low and Zero Carbon
Generating Technology in New Development), Policy 41 (Biodiversity), Policy 42
(Green Infrastructure), Policy 52 (New Development and Flooding) and Policy 60
(Transport Standards and Accessibility Requirements). 
56. These policies are assessed further in the report below. 
Brownfield Land 
57. NPF4 Policy 9 (Brownfield, Vacant and Derelict Land and Empty Buildings)
promotes the reuse of brownfield land to help reduce the need for greenfield
development. The proposal satisfies NPF4 Policy 9 a). 
Affordable Homes 
58. NPF4 Policy 16 aims to encourage, promote and facilitate the delivery of more
high quality, affordable and sustainable homes, in the right locations, providing
choice across tenures that meet the diverse housing needs of people and
communities. 
59. In respect of NPF4 Policy 16a), the site is not allocated in the Local Development
Plan. NPF4 Policy 16 f) states that development proposals for new homes on
land not allocated for housing in the LDP will only be supported in limited
circumstances where: 
i. the proposal is supported by an agreed timescale for build-out; and
ii. the proposal is otherwise consistent with the plan spatial strategy and other
relevant policies including local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods;

Page 10

iii. and either:
• delivery of sites is happening earlier than identified in the deliverable
housing land pipeline. This will be determined by reference to two
consecutive years of the Housing Land Audit evidencing substantial
delivery earlier than pipeline timescales and that general trend being
sustained; or
• the proposal is consistent with policy on rural homes; or
• the proposal is for smaller scale opportunities within an existing settlement
boundary; or
• the proposal is for the delivery of less than 50 affordable homes as part of
a local authority supported affordable housing plan. 
60. This application is for 100% affordable housing (Condition 7). The site is included
the Strategic Housing Investment Plan (SHIP) and the Council is in negotiations
to take ownership of all the homes and will assess a wide range of affordable
housing tenures, including intermediate rent and low-cost home ownership, to
ensure that an optimal and appropriate housing mix is in place. The proposal
supports the Council’s affordable housing plan and therefore satisfies NPF4
Policy 16 f) and LDP2 Policy 20 Affordable Housing. 
Design, Layout and Visual Amenity 
61. A Design and Access Statement (Drawing 25) and addendum (Drawing 63) have
been submitted. The design has evolved through both the pre-application
process and via this planning application as outlined in the Design and Access
Statement. The documents note that the layout and architectural approach have
been informed by a comprehensive appraisal of the site’s physical
characteristics, surrounding built context, and technical constraints. Drawing 61
Proposed 3D Visuals supplements the Design Statement and provides an
assessment of density and massing together with contextual visuals. 
62. The proposed flatted blocks are arranged to create defined street frontages,
particularly along Main Street, while internal blocks provide natural surveillance
over a shared central area of amenity space and pedestrian routes. The stepped
design of two and three storey blocks on the north and east boundary of the site
responds sensitively to site constraints and the surrounding dwellinghouses. The
eastern side of Main Street is characterised by a continuous built frontage and
this is acknowledged through the proposed three storey blocks with a footpath
connection to Main Street providing separation between Block 1 and Block 2. 
63. The higher density approach to developing this brownfield site creates variation
on the northern edge of the settlement to form a pleasant walkable
neighbourhood that supports and could potentially enhance local facilities such
as shops, services and public transport. 
64. Addressing the issues of scale and height raised in the representations, on Back
Street the two and three storey blocks (Blocks 4 and 5) are set back 10m
(approximately) from the road edge with a grassed and tree lined green buffer

Page 11

proposed between the road and the blocks. This helps to mitigate any perception
of enclosure and softens the overall streetscape. In contrast, the now demolished
single storey care home buildings were positioned hard on the road edge. 
65. Whilst the buildings on Back Street are predominantly two storeys, there is an
existing three-storey building at the corner of Dunning Street and Back Street. In
this area there are buildings with dormers in the roof which appear as three
storeys when viewed from the street. The proposed scale is consistent with the
character and urban form of the area. The transition between the two storey and
three storey elements create variation and respond positively to the existing
topography and the gradual reduction in surrounding building heights as Back
Street slopes towards Riverside. The stepped massing approach helps integrate
the development into the streetscape. 
66. On the north boundary, Block 3 is two storey and three storeys. The stepped
arrangement of the blocks ensures the scale is broken down appropriately and
responds sensitively to the adjacent dwellinghouse attached to the commercial
holiday lodge development. The existing trees along the north boundary are to be
retained with additional planting introduced to further strengthen the landscape
edge and soften the built form when viewed from the surrounding area. 
67. The existing site levels across the site have been retained where possible to
mitigate the height of the blocks. Along Main Street, Block 1 and Block 2 step
down from street level. Due to site topography, steps provide access to Back
Street and the core path at the rear of Block 4. Low level retaining walls are
proposed at a parking area located on the north boundary and on a footpath to
access the rear of Block 5 on the east boundary, a condition is proposed for full
details to be provided for written approval (Condition 12). A dropped basecourse
is proposed for Block 3 and Block 5 on the north and east boundary respectively
(Drawing 43). 
68. The external finishes were revised during the application process from off-white
roughcast and brick feature panels to buff coloured roughcast and stone
concentrated on key elevations and entrances to provide a more attractive
appearance and better reflect the surrounding built environment. A condition is
proposed for samples of the external finishes for the blocks to be submitted for
written approval prior to the commencement of the development (condition 6). 
69. The proposed development is integrated into the surrounding area through a
network of footpaths. A new footpath is to be created on Dark Walk to provide a
safer passage for pedestrians in comparison to the existing scenario. The
landscape plan has been revised and enhanced to provide a strong native-led
green framework for the site. Planting has been selected to reinforce the Main
Street and Back Street boundaries, soften the residential blocks, support the
central amenity space and improve habitat value and seasonal interest. 
70. The new build proposal is considered to enrich the character and qualities of the
existing built environment. Collectively, the landscape proposals will create an

Page 12

attractive streetscape, provide replacement canopy cover, boundary definition,
visual softening and habitat creation opportunities. 
71. The proposal is a well-designed, connected, sustainable development of modern
affordable flats which support local living. The development is consistent with the
Scottish Government’s six qualities of successful places. The proposal satisfies
NPF4 Policy 14 Design, Quality and Place, NPF4 Policy 15 Local Living, LDP2
Policy 1 Placemaking and LDP2 Policy 17 Residential Areas. 
Residential Amenity 
72. The representations raise the issue of loss of privacy, overlooking, loss of
daylight and impact on residential amenity due to the scale, height and
overbearing nature of the proposed development. 
73. The submitted Site Sections (Drawings 37 and 38) include a study of daylight
and overshadowing to demonstrate that there are no amenity issues arising in
this respect. The street section shows the height and scale of the proposed
buildings and their fit in the context of the wider streetscape. As noted in the
section above, the stepped design of two and three storey blocks on the north
and east boundary of the site responds sensitively to the challenges of site
constraints and respects the surrounding dwellinghouses. A suitable set back
and a green buffer helps to mitigate the scale and height of the blocks. 
74. The proposal will not have a significant detrimental effect on residential amenity.
In this respect, the proposal aligns with the general principles of NPF4 Policy 14
Design, Quality and Place and LDP2 Policy 1 Placemaking and LD2 Policy 17
Residential Areas. 
75. To protect residential amenity during the construction phase, Condition 10 is
proposed which sets out the operational times for construction work. 
76. In respect of the proposed flats and residential amenity, ASHPs may be installed
as set out in a Sustainable Design Statement (Drawing 32) with other alternative
technology also being explored. Full details will be submitted as part of the
building warrant process. An informative is proposed to ensure that noise does
not impact residential amenity (Informative 11). The informative is in line with
NPF4 Policy 23 e) and LDP2 Policy 56 Noise Pollution. 
Roads and Access 
77. The representations raise concern with a number of road related matters
including the level of parking proposed in the site, the impact on the local road
network, road and pedestrian safety. These matters are addressed in this section
of the report. 
78. Transportation and Development reviewed the proposal and a Transport
Statement (Drawing 33) prepared by Fairhurst (December 2025). Further
information was submitted during the application process to address their initial

Page 13

comments and issues raised in the representations, and changes were made to
the proposed site plan (Drawing 36) through positive discussion with the
applicant. 
Access 
79. Access to the site is to be taken from Main Street. There are currently two points
of vehicle access to the site, which were associated with the former care home.
The care home used to operate a one-way system, whereby vehicles entered the
site via the north access and exited via the south access. The proposal for
housing on the site involves consolidating the access points into one single
access at the north end which provides access and egress. 
80. Main Street is now a 20mph speed limit, having previously been a 30mph speed
limit. There is a corresponding need for junction visibility splays of 2.4m x 25m at
the site access junction, based on standards contained within ‘Designing
Streets’. This can be met and a condition is proposed to ensure that full visibility
splays are provided (Condition 18). The vehicle access is to be formed in
accordance with PKC Road Development Guide and Condition 19 refers. 
Parking 
81. Within the site, car parking is increased from 36 spaces to 42 spaces, one space
per flat. 
82. There is an existing issue with the availability of on-street parking highlighted in
the representations. Sufficient parking space has been provided for this
development to ensure there is not a significant impact on parking provision in
the area. 
83. Parking spaces are to be future proofed for EV Charging with space provided for
charging points, cabling and ducting (Condition 21). In line with standards used
by Transportation and Development, secure storage for 53 cycle spaces is
proposed to encourage active travel (Condition 22). This is in line with NPF4
Policy 13 and LDP2 Policy 60B. 
Footpaths 
84. The proposal is well integrated into the existing network of footpaths with a
number of opportunities created for people travelling into the development as
well as through it. 
85. To avoid cutting down trees, the applicant is to provide a crossing point at the
north side of the vehicular access to connect with the footway into the
development site on the south side. 
86. A footpath is proposed on the north side of Dark Walk to improve the connection
to Back Street from Main Street and provide a safe passage for pedestrians.
From the development, a footpath link is created on the east boundary to access

Page 14

Back Street and a core path to the riverside. Condition 14 is proposed to ensure
that the core path is not obstructed during the construction phase or on
completion of the development and any damage done to the route and/or the
associated signage during the building phase must be made good prior the
development being completed or brought into use, whichever is the earlier. 
87. A footpath provides direct connection to Main Street from the development site. A
bus stop is located on this footpath connection, and the developer is to upgrade
this to a new 3 bay enclosed bus shelter with lighting and Real Time Passenger
Information display, a condition is proposed to secure this (Condition 24). 
Impact on Local Road Network 
88. In the interest of road safety and site management, a Construction Traffic
Management Scheme is to be submitted for written approval of the Council as
Planning Authority prior to the commencement of development (Condition 25).
This will take into account the timing of construction traffic to minimise impact on
local communities particularly at school start and finishing times, refuse collection
days and during local events. 
89. A Transport Statement (Drawing 33) considers the proposed development would
not have a significant impact on the surrounding network. Transportation and
Development have reviewed this and considered the cumulative impact of this
development and a recently consented Petrol Station opposite the site
(26/00060/FLL). As noted in the consultation response this is well within the
category of daily trip variation. Given the relatively low trip generation of the
combined developments, this analysis demonstrates that there is minimal impact
on the surrounding road network, with less than 1 trip a minute in the AM and PM
peak hours. 
Speed Limit 
90. Main Street has a 20mph speed limit. Concerns have been raised in the
representations that speeds may be higher than 20mph, this would be a matter
for Police Scotland to investigate. 
91. In line with NPF4 Policy 13 Sustainable Transport and LDP2 Policy 60B, the site
is accessible by sustainable means of walking, cycling and public transport. The
increased car parking on site from the original proposals, upgraded footway links,
cycle parking, bus stop improvements and footways around the site are all aimed
at minimising the impact of the development on the road network and promoting
active travel. 
Drainage and Flooding 
Flood Risk 
92. The representations highlighted flood risk and flood maps show the northeast
corner of the site is at flood risk. A Flood Risk Assessment (Drawing 29)

Page 15

prepared by Fairhurst (October 2025) was submitted and reviewed by SEPA and
the Flooding Team. The Flood Risk Assessment notes that flood risk at the site
was primarily assessed in relation to fluvial and tidal flood risk from the River
Earn and Deich Burn and other potential sources of flood risk were also
considered. 
93. An initial holding objection from SEPA was removed on the submission of further
information by Fairhurst. Condition 2 is to be applied as per SEPA’s consultation
response to ensure that the finished floor levels of the development ensure a
minimum freeboard of 600mm is achieved. 
94. The supporting information demonstrates that flood risk to the site can be
appropriately managed. The proposal satisfies NPF4 Policy 22 a) iv) and LDP2
Policy 52 subject to a condition. 
Drainage 
95. A Drainage Assessment Report (Drawing 48) prepared by Fairhurst (December
2025) and related drawings (Drawings 45-48) have been reviewed by the
Flooding Team. 
96. Surface Water Drainage - The new surface water drains will drain to a geocellular
crate storage area via a new filter trench. This will discharge at a restricted rate
to the existing sewer at the south of the site through a new surface water
network. All rain and surface water is to be managed through sustainable urban
drainage systems. 
97. Foul Drainage - A new adoptable foul drainage network is proposed to serve the
development and will connect to the existing combined sewer network to the
south. 
98. Construction Phase – The Drainage Assessment Report (Drawing 48) notes that
the surface water management strategy will be based on the Contractor’s
Method Statement and will incorporate measures to prevent the surface water
run-off from the construction works discharging direct to the watercourses
(Condition 9). 
99. The drainage proposal satisfies NPF4 Policy 22 c) and LDP2 Policy 53B Foul
Drainage and LDP2 Policy 53C Surface Water Drainage. 
Contamination 
100. A Phase 1 Desk Study Report (Drawing 31) produced by Fairhurst Group LLP
(November 2025) was included as part of this application.  The report
highlighted potential risk from made ground to receptors and recommended
further geo-environmental investigation be carried out across the site to verify the
presence of contaminants.  The report was reviewed by the Contaminated Land
Officer who concurred with the report’s recommendations. It is recommended
that Condition 3 is applied to any consent granted and this shall remain in place

Page 16

until a Phase 2 Site Investigation report is received for review and the written
approval of the Contaminated Land Officer, as per the recommendations of the
Phase 1 Desk Study Report. 
101. The proposal satisfies NPF4 Policy 9 c) and LDP2 Policy 58A: Contaminated
Land, subject to condition. 
Natural Heritage and Biodiversity 
Trees 
102. The representations highlight that it is unclear what trees are to be removed and
retained as part of the proposed development. 
103. Following initial comments by the Tree Officer and in light of the comments in the
representations, further information was requested through the application
process to confirm the tree loss to enable the development and the trees to be
retained and protected during the construction phase. An enhanced landscape
plan was also requested to show a suitable level of compensatory planting and
species mix. 
104. A revised Tree Report (Drawing 49), Site Layout with Existing Tree Overlay
(Drawing 40) and Landscape Plan (Drawing 41) were submitted. The Tree
Officer is satisfied that the revised Tree Report and plans contained within, and
the proposed landscape plan address the initial issues raised. 
105. There are 18 trees on site and 5 are to be retained. Tree removal has been
clearly indicated and includes trees of poor condition and satisfactory
compensatory planting is proposed with a suitable mix of native trees, hedgerow
and shrubs. A group of trees in the northwest corner of the site is to be retained
together with two trees on the north boundary. 
106. The trees and bushes on the Main Street boundary (west) are to be removed.
The proposals seek to positively reinstate the relationship with Main Street
through the introduction of lower-level hedgerows, a mixed planting strategy,
enhanced pedestrian connectivity and accessible landscaped spaces that create
a more open, attractive and welcoming place. 
107. A condition is proposed to ensure tree protection measures are in place during
the construction phase (Condition 4) and a further condition is proposed to
ensure that the revised landscape plan is implemented and any trees lost are
replaced within five years of planting (Condition 5). 
108. The proposal satisfies LDP2 Policy 40B Trees, Woodland and Development. 
Biodiversity 
109. A revised Ecological Assessment Report (Drawing 69) was submitted in
consultation with the Biodiversity Officer. This is supplemented by a revised

Page 17

Landscape Plan (Drawing 41) showing biodiversity enhancement and Drawings
64-68 which show swift and bat boxes to be integrated into the development. 
110. The Biodiversity Officer confirms that the revised Ecological Assessment Report
is in accordance with best practice and undertaken at the correct time of year. A
condition is proposed to ensure all recommendations in the report are adhered to
in full (Condition 15) and a condition to ensure the bat and swift boxes are
installed on the buildings as indicated in the report and drawings (Condition 17). 
111. The proposal satisfies NPF4 Policy 3 Biodiversity and LDP2 Policy 41
Biodiversity, subject to conditions. 
Low and Zero Carbon Generating Technologies 
112. LDP2 Policy 32 ‘Embedding Low and Zero Carbon Generating Technology in
New Development’ states that proposals for all new buildings will be required to
demonstrate that at least 10% of the current carbon emissions reduction set by
Scottish Building Standards will be met through the installation and operation of
low and zero-carbon generating technologies. As this proposal includes the
erection of a new building, consideration must be given to this requirement.
Further, NPF4 Policy 2 ‘Climate Mitigation and Adaptation’ requires that
development should be designed to reduce green gas emissions. In this
instance, a Sustainable Design Statement outlines measures to reduce carbon
emissions (Drawing 32). No further detail is provided with the planning
application. However, this will be subject to further assessment through the
building warrant process. A condition is proposed to ensure the proposal
complies with the relevant policies (Condition 8). 
Developer Contributions 
Primary School 
113. This proposal is within the catchment of Dunbarney Primary School, where a
capacity constraint has been identified. However, the proposed development is
for affordable housing, which is not required to make Primary Education
Contributions (paragraph 4.5 of the Supplementary Guidance). 
114. A Primary Education contribution is therefore not required. 
Transport Infrastructure 
115. The site is located in the ‘Full’ Transport Infrastructure contributions zone
(Appendix 3 of the Supplementary Guidance) and the contributions rates are set
out in table 6.21 of the Supplementary Guidance.   
116. Where a new proposal replaces an existing development with planning
permission, the assessment for contributions is normally applied to the net
additional development (as set out in paragraph 3.6 of the Supplementary
Guidance). The application site’s previous use was as a care home, and that

Page 18

previous use would normally be taken into account except in this case because it
is understood that the site has been cleared of the previous care home use. 
117. The full contributions area - residential affordable rate of £2,184 per unit would
apply to all 42 units. 
118. A Transport Infrastructure contribution of ( 42 x £2,184 ) = £91,728 is therefore
required. 
119. The developer contribution requirement aligns with NPF4 Policy 18 and LDP2
Policy 5. 
Material Considerations 
Representations 
120. The issues raised in the representations have been fully considered in the report
above and are not of sufficient weight to justify refusal of the proposed
development. 
National Housing Emergency    
121. Across Scotland there is a national housing emergency, and this is one of the
Scottish Government’s key areas for action and one which the planning system
can contribute to addressing through both the Development Plan process (site
allocations) and Development Management (determining applications). 
122. NPF4 Policy 16 part f) relates to the delivery of unallocated sites in settlement
boundaries which are otherwise consistent with the plan spatial strategy and
other relevant policies including local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods. This
policy offers support for the delivery of less than 50 affordable homes as part of a
local authority supported affordable housing plan. The proposal satisfies NPF4
Policy 16 f) and other relevant policies in the Development Plan. 
123. The need for affordable homes does not automatically override all other planning
assessments and considerations but it is nevertheless a significant consideration
for this development bearing in mind the committed financial investment by the
Council for developing this site, as identified in the SHIP.   
Economic Impact 
124. The proposal could have a positive impact on the local economy through the
creation of jobs during construction. 
Variation Of Application Under Section 32A 
125. This application was varied prior to determination, in accordance with the terms
of section 32A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as
amended.  The variations incorporate changes to the material finish of the flats,

Page 19

the addition of a footpath on Dark Walk and changes to the layout of the central
area of parking, waste storage and cycle storage. 
Planning Obligations And Legal Agreements 
126. None required. 
Direction By Scottish Ministers 
127. Under the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure)
(Scotland) Regulations 2013, regulations 30 – 33 there have been no directions
by the Scottish Government in respect of an Environmental Impact Assessment
screening opinion, call in or notification relating to this application. 
128. Under the Town and Country Planning (Notification of Applications) (10 or more
homes on non-allocated land) (Scotland) Direction 2025, as this proposal
involves the development of the site for 10 or more homes on a site not
specifically allocated for housing, it requires the local authority to notify Scottish
Ministers of the decision on this application.  This takes place regardless of the
outcome of the application, and is used for evidence led monitoring by the
Scottish Ministers as to how Policy 16 ‘Quality Homes’ of NPF4 is being applied. 
Conclusion and Reasons for Recommendation 
129. To conclude, the application must be determined in accordance with the
Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this
respect, the proposal is considered to comply with NPF4, and the adopted Local
Development Plan 2 (2019).  Account has been taken account of the relevant
material considerations, and none has been found that would justify overriding
the Development Plan.  Accordingly, the proposal is recommended for approval
subject to the following conditions. 
Recommendation   
Subject to the following conditions: 
Conditions and Reasons for Recommendation 
1. This planning permission will last only for three years from the date of this
decision notice, unless the development has been lawfully started within that
period. 
Reason - This is a Planning Permission in terms of Section 58 of the Town and
Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as amended by Section 32 of the
Planning (Scotland) Act 2019. 
2. The finished floor levels of the development shall be set no lower than 8.09m
AOD, in accordance with the levels specified by Fairhurst in their email to SEPA
dated 28 April 2026 on the planning record and the Fairhurst Flood Risk

Page 20

Assessment (October 2025) Drawing 29, ensuring a minimum freeboard of
600mm is achieved. 
Reason - In order to take account of the flood risk from the adjacent watercourse. 
3. Development shall not commence on site until an evaluation for the potential of
the site to be affected by contamination by a previous use has been undertaken
and, as a minimum, a Preliminary Risk Assessment (Phase 1 Desk Study) has
been submitted for consideration and accepted by the Council as Planning
Authority.  If the preliminary risk assessment identifies the need for further
assessment, an intrusive investigation shall be undertaken to identify; 
I. the nature, extent and type(s) of contamination on the site 
II. measures to treat/remove contamination to ensure the site is fit for the use
proposed 
III. measures to deal with contamination during construction works 
IV. condition of the site on completion of decontamination measures. 
Prior to the completion or bringing into use of any part of the development the
measures to decontaminate the site shall be fully implemented in accordance
with the scheme subsequently agreed by the Council as Planning Authority. 
Verification that the scheme has been fully implemented must also be submitted
to the Council as Planning Authority. 
Reason - In order to deal with any potential contamination of the site as a result
of its former use. 
4. Prior to the commencement of any works on site, all trees on site (other than
those marked for felling on the approved plans) and those which have Root
Protection Areas which fall within the site shall be retained and protected.
Protection methods shall be strictly in accordance with BS 5837 2012: Trees in
Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction.  Protection measures, once in
place, shall remain in place for the duration of construction. 
Reason - To ensure a satisfactory standard of development and environmental
quality and to reserve the rights of the Planning Authority. 
5. The detailed landscaping and planting scheme which is hereby approved shall be
completed within the first available planting season (October to March) after the
completion or bringing into use of the development, whichever is the earlier. 
The approved scheme shall thereafter be maintained with any planting which
fails to become established within five years being replaced in the following
planting season with others of a size and species as previously approved. 
Reason - In the interests of visual amenity and to ensure the satisfactory
implementation of the proposed planting scheme. 
6. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, samples of the
specification and colour of the proposed external finishing to be used shall be

Page 21

submitted to and agreed in writing by the Council as Planning Authority.  The
scheme as agreed shall be implemented prior to the completion or bringing into
use of the development, whichever is the earlier. 
Reason - In the interests of visual amenity; to ensure a satisfactory standard of
local environmental quality. 
7. All the approved residential units shall be affordable units, as per the definitions
contained within Planning Advice Note 2/2010 (Affordable Housing and Housing
Land Audits). 
Reason - The development has been approved as affordable housing. 
8  Prior to the commencement of development a statement shall be submitted for
approval in writing by the Council as Planning Authority to demonstrate that at
least 10% of the current carbon emissions reduction set by Scottish Building
Standards will be met through the installation and operation of low and zero-
carbon generating technologies.  The statement as agreed shall be fully
implemented to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority. 
Reason - To ensure a satisfactory standard of development and environmental
quality and to reserve the rights of the Planning Authority. 
9. Concurrent with the initiation of the development hereby approved and for the
duration of construction, a temporary surface water treatment facility which
accords with Sustainable Urban Drainage System principles shall be
implemented for the site and maintained for the duration of the approved
development works to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority.  The
temporary surface water treatment facility shall remain in place until the
permanent surface water drainage scheme is implemented. 
Reason - To ensure a satisfactory standard of development and environmental
quality and to reserve the rights of the Planning Authority. 
10. Construction work shall be limited to Monday to Friday 0700 hours to 1900 hours
and Saturday 0800 hours to 1300 hours with no noisy works out with these times
or at any time on Sundays or bank holidays.  These construction times shall be
implemented throughout the construction stage of the development unless
approval has been obtained in writing by the Council as Planning Authority for
alternative arrangements. 
Reason - In order to ensure the construction phase is properly managed to avoid
unnecessary impacts on existing residential amenity.   
11. Storm water drainage from all paved surfaces, including the vehicular access,
shall be disposed of by means of suitable a Sustainable Urban Drainage System
to meet the requirements of best management practices. 
Reason - In order to ensure the site is adequately drained.

Page 22

12. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, precise details
of all proposed retaining walls and structures shall be submitted to and approved
in writing by the Council as Planning Authority.  The details shall include visual
mitigation measures for exposed surfaces. The approved details shall be
implemented in full. 
Reason - In order to clarify the terms of this planning permission. 
13. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, precise details
of all proposed boundary treatments shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Council as Planning Authority.  The approved details shall be
implemented in full. 
Reason - In order to clarify the terms of this planning permission. 
14. Existing core paths in the area must not be obstructed during the construction
phase or on completion of the development.  Any damage done to the route
and/or the associated signage during building phase must be made good prior
the development being completed or brought into use, whichever is the earlier. 
Reason - In order to protect existing public paths and to ensure no unnecessary
damage occurs. 
15. The conclusions and recommended action points within the supporting
biodiversity survey submitted and hereby approved (Drawing 69) shall be fully
adhered to, respected and undertaken as part of the construction phase of
development, to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority. 
Reason - In the interests of protecting environmental quality and of biodiversity. 
16. An updated ecology survey will be required prior to the commencement of works,
if works have not commenced within 24 months of the date of the ecology survey
approved as part of this permission.  The updated survey shall be submitted to
the Council as Planning Authority for written agreement and works shall not
commence until after such written agreement has been issued by the Council. 
Reason - In the interests of employing best practice ecology and to ensure there
is no adverse impact on any protected species as identified under the Wildlife
and Countryside Act (1981). 
17. Prior to the completion or occupation of the development hereby approved, all
biodiversity enhancement measures listed within the supporting drawings
(Drawings 41 and 64-68) submitted and hereby approved shall be provided.
Thereafter, the agreed scheme shall be maintained in a reasonable condition for
the life of the development, to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning
Authority. 
Reason - In the interests of protecting environmental quality and of biodiversity.

Page 23

18. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, full visibility
splays of 25 metres along the channel line shall be provided to the left and right
of the access, at a set-back of 2.4 metres measured 1.05m above the road level
to the standard and specification required by the Council as Roads Authority to
the satisfaction of the Planning Authority.  The visibility splays shall be
physically formed on the ground and any existing fences, walls, hedges or other
means of enclosure or obstructions within the splays shall be removed and
relocated out with the splays.  Once formed, the visibility splays shall be
permanently retained thereafter, and no visual obstruction of any kind shall be
permitted within the visibility splays so formed. 
Reason - In the interests of road safety; to ensure an acceptable standard of
construction within the public road boundary. 
19. Prior to the development hereby approved being completed or brought into use,
the vehicular access shall be formed in accordance with Perth & Kinross
Council's Road Development Guide Type C Figure 5.7 access detail, of Type B
Road construction detail. 
Reason - In the interests of road safety; to ensure an acceptable standard of
construction within the public road boundary. 
20. Prior to the occupation of the first flat, a footway with a minimum width of 2
metres shall be provide along the frontage of the development site on A912 Main
Street, Dark Walk and Back Street with the footway being reconstructed to
remove any existing vehicle accesses that were used to access the former
Moncrieffe Care Home and provided with a full height kerb.  Dropped kerbs will
be provided on A912 Street across Dark Walk to provide connectivity with local
amenities to the south of the development site and dropped kerbs will be
provided on Dark Walk where the internal footways exit onto Dark Walk and
similarly on Back Street where the internal footways exit onto Back Street.  The
footway on Back Street shall link into the existing footway to the north of the site. 
The footway shall be constructed using the detail below, unless agreed in writing: 
• 20mm Surface Course
• 50mm Binder Course
• 225mm Sub-base type 1 
The work shall be supervised by the Area Roads Engineer and in accordance
with standards of the Roads Authority. 
Reason - In the interests of road safety; to ensure an acceptable standard of
construction within the public road boundary. 
21. Prior to commencement of development, an updated layout plan showing a
minimum 0.6 metre Electric Vehicle enabling charging infrastructure
channel/hardstanding area at the rear of each parking bay, including the routeing
of the ducting from each flat to the properties parking bay, shall be submitted and

Page 24

approved in writing by the Council as planning authority.  The submission will
confirm the location and specification of the enabling infrastructure.  The Electric
Vehicle enabling charging infrastructure channel/hardstanding area and the
ducting from the property to the parking bay shall be provided prior to the
occupation of the development. 
Reason - In the interests of sustainable travel and future EV vehicle ownership. 
22. Prior to commencement of any development on site, a detailed design for the
proposed secure covered cycle parking facility for a minimum of 53 cycles shall
be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation
with the Roads Authority.  The cycle parking, as approved in writing, shall be
implemented in accordance with the approved details to the satisfaction of the
Council as Planning Authority prior to the development being brought into use. 
Reason - To encourage active travel and meet advice within NPF4 on transport. 
23. No part of the development shall be occupied until a Residential Travel Plan
(RTP), aimed to encourage more sustainable means of travel, has been
submitted and approved in writing by the Council.  The RTP will have particular
regard to provision for walking, cycling and public transport access to and within
the site and will identify the measures to be provided, the system of
management, monitoring, review, reporting and the duration of the plan. 
Reason - To promote sustainable transport options and to meet advice within
NPF4 on transport. 
24. Prior to the occupation of the first flat, the developer shall provide and install on
appropriate hard stand asphalt areas at the rear of the footway on the A912 Main
Street within the development site, a 3 bay enclosed bus shelter supplied
(Cairngorm style) and installed with passenger information board, LED spotlights
(one per bay), a 28in Ultra-Wide Display Screen for Real Time Passenger
Information installed on the approach side of the shelter and a 24/7 electrical
power supply to a Haldo pillar adjacent to the shelter to provide power for the
LED lighting and Real Time Passenger Information display to be operational. 
The design, specification and operation shall be to the satisfaction of the Council
as Planning Authority, in consultation with Perth & Kinross Council’s Public
Transport Unit.  In the event that it is not possible to install at this location, an
alternative shall be agreed in writing with the planning authority. 
Reason - In the interest of sustainable travel. 
25. Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, the applicant
shall submit for the further written agreement of the Council as Planning
Authority, in consultation with the Roads Authority (Structures), a Construction
Traffic Management Scheme (TMS) which shall include the following:

Page 25

• restriction of construction traffic to approved routes and the measures to be
put in place to avoid other routes being used;
• timing of construction traffic to minimise impact on local communities
particularly at school start and finishing times, on days when refuse collection
is undertaken, on Sundays and during local events;
• a code of conduct for HGV drivers to allow for queuing traffic to pass;
• arrangements for liaison with the Roads Authority regarding winter
maintenance;
• emergency arrangements detailing communication and contingency
arrangements in the event of vehicle breakdown;
• arrangements for the cleaning of wheels and chassis of vehicles to prevent
material from construction sites associated with the development being
deposited on the road;
• arrangements for cleaning of roads affected by material deposited from
construction sites associated with the development;
• arrangements for signage at site accesses and crossovers and on roads to be
used by construction traffic in order to provide safe access for pedestrians,
cyclists and equestrians;
• details of information signs to inform other road users of construction traffic;
• arrangements to ensure that access for emergency service vehicles are not
impeded;
• co-ordination with other significant developments known to use roads affected
by construction traffic;
• traffic arrangements in the immediate vicinity of temporary construction
compounds;
• the provision and installation of traffic counters at the applicant's expense at
locations to be agreed prior to the commencement of construction;
• monitoring, reporting and implementation arrangements; 
• arrangements for dealing with non-compliance; and
• details of HGV movements to and from the site.   
The TMS as approved shall be strictly adhered to during the entire site
construction programme. 
Reason - In the interest of proper site management. 
Justification 
The proposal is in accordance with the Development Plan and there are no
material reasons which justify departing from the Development Plan. 
Procedural Notes 
The planning permission decision notice shall not be issued until such time as
the required Developer Contributions have been secured or paid in full.  In the
event the applicant does not either make the required payment within 28 days
from the date the agent/applicant is advised of the need for the contributions, or
complete a legal agreement for delayed payment within a 4 month period from

Page 26

the date the agent/applicant is advised of the need for the contributions the
application may be refused under delegated powers without any further
discussion with the applicant. 
Informatives 
1. Under Section 27A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as
amended) the person undertaking the development is required to give the
Planning Authority prior written notification of the date on which it is intended to
commence the development.  A failure to comply with this statutory requirement
would constitute a breach of planning control under Section 123(1) of that Act,
which may result in enforcement action being taken.  Please use the form
attached herewith. 
2. As soon as practicable after the development is complete, the person who
completes the development is obliged by Section 27B of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended) to give the Planning Authority written
notice of that position.  Please use the form attached herewith. 
3. The applicant is advised that Perth and Kinross Council have a charging scheme
for recycling and waste bins for new build properties and newly created
dwellings. Further information can be found at:
https://www.pkc.gov.uk/binrequests 
4. This planning permission is granted subject to conditions, some of which require
further information to be submitted to Development Management either before
works can start on site or at a certain time.  The required information must be
submitted via the ePlanning portal if your original application was lodged that
way, otherwise send it to us at developmentmanagement@pkc.gov.uk.  Please
be aware that a fee is payable in respect of each request made, though there is
no limit to the number of conditions that can be discharged in a single request. 
The Fees Charter is available on our website www.pkc.gov.uk. 
The Council has two months to consider the information.  You should therefore
submit the required information more than two months before your permission
expires.  We cannot guarantee that submissions made within two months of the
expiry date of your permission will be able to be dealt with before your
permission lapses. 
5. This application was varied prior to determination, in accordance with the terms
of Section 32A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as
amended.  The variations incorporate changes to the material finish of the flats,
the addition of a footpath on Dark Walk and changes to the layout of the central
area of parking, waste storage and cycle storage. 
6. The planning permission decision notice shall not be issued until such time as
the required Developer Contributions have been secured or paid in full.

Page 27

In the event the applicant does not either make the required payment within 28
days from the date the agent/applicant is advised of the need for the
contributions, or complete a legal agreement for delayed payment within a 4
month period from the date the agent/applicant is advised of the need for the
contributions the application may be refused under delegated powers without any
further discussion with the applicant. 
7. The applicant should take note of the information and advice contained within the
consultation response from Scottish Water. 
8. The applicant is advised to refer to Perth & Kinross Council's Supplementary
Guidance on Flood Risk and Flood Risk Assessments 2021 as it contains advice
relevant to your development. https://www.pkc.gov.uk/ldp2floodrisk 
9. The developer must contact the Community Waste Team to discuss bin
collections as the site progresses. 
10. The granting of planning permission does not stop the continued right of public
access along the existing core path EARN/8, 42/8.  An order under the Town
and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, Section 208 or an amendment of the
Core Path Plan under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 should be sought in
advance of any works authorised by this planning permission being commenced. 
All relevant approvals should be in place prior to any stopping up and diversion of
the core path taking place. 
11. The Air Source Heat Pump shall be certificated in accordance with
Microgeneration Certification Scheme 007 and installed by an installation
company certificated in accordance with Microgeneration Installation Standard
3005 and in compliance with the calculation procedure contained in Table 2 of
Microgeneration Certification Scheme Planning Standards (MCS 020), confirming
that the permitted development noise limit of 42 dB LAeq, 5 mins will be met.  In
addition, the Air Source Heat Pump shall be so enclosed, attenuated and/or
maintained such that any noise therefrom shall not exceed Noise Rating 35
between 0700 and 2300 hours daily, or Noise Rating 25 between 2300 and 0700
hours daily, within any neighbouring residential property, with all windows slightly
open, when measured and/ or calculated and plotted on a rating curve chart. 
12. Trees and scrub are likely to contain nesting birds between 1st March and 31st
August inclusive.  Trees and scrub are present on the application site and are to
be assumed to contain nesting birds between the above dates.  The applicant is
reminded that, under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as amended
(Section 1), it is an offence to remove, damage or destroy the nest of any wild
bird while that nest is in use or being built.  Planning permission for a
development does not provide a defence against prosecution under this Act. 
13. The applicant should be advised that in terms of Section 21 of the Roads
(Scotland) Act 1984 they must obtain from the Council as Roads Authority
consent to construct a new road prior to the commencement of roadworks. 
Advice on the disposal of surface water must be sought at the initial stages of

Page 28

design from Scottish Water and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency. 
Please note that a fee is chargeable for the processing of RCC applications. 
14. The applicant is advised that, in terms of Sections 56 of the Roads (Scotland) Act
1984, he/she/they must obtain from the Council, as Roads Authority, consent to
open an existing road or footway prior to the commencement of works. 
Information on junction types, requirements for Vehicular Access consents (VA1)
and application forms are available at www.pkc.gov.uk/vehicleaccess.  Advice
on the disposal of surface water should be sought at the initial stages of design
from Scottish Water and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency. 
15. The applicant is advised that, in terms of Sections 109 of the New Roads and
Street Works Act 1991, he/she/they must obtain consent from the Council, to
place, maintain or adjust apparatus in, or under a Road or remove apparatus
from a road.  Application forms are available at
https://www.pkc.gov.uk/article/14916/Road-and-footway-permits. 
Background Papers
Letters of representation 48 
Authors
Name Designation Contact Details
Claire Myles Planning Officer 01738 475300
developmentmanagement@pkc.gov.uk 
Approved
Name Designation Date
Paul Williamson Team Leader (Local
Developments)
29th September 2026