Item 4(v) LRB-2023-03
Perth and Kinross Council · 13 March 2023
Back to Local Review Body — 13 March 2023 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
4(v) LRB-2023-03 LRB-2023-03 22/01623/FLL – Installation of solar panels, Appletree House, The Ross, Comrie, Crieff, PH6 2JU INDEX (a) Papers submitted by the Applicant (Pages 303-326) (b) Decision Notice (Pages 329-330) Report of Handling (Pages 331-336) Reference Documents (Pages 319-320, 322-323 and 337) (c) Representations (Pages 339-344) 301
Page 2
302
Page 3
4(v)(a) LRB-2023-03 LRB-2023-03 22/01623/FLL – Installation of solar panels, Appletree House, The Ross, Comrie, Crieff, PH6 2JU PAPERS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT 303
Page 4
304
Page 5
305
Page 6
306
Page 7
307
Page 8
308
Page 9
24th January 2023 The Secretary, Apple Tree House Local Review Body The Ross Perth & Kinross Council, Comrie Committee Services Perthshire Council Building PH6 2JU 2 High Street Perth PH1 5PH Application for Installation of Solar PV Panels at Apple Tree House, The Ross, Comrie, PH6 2JU Application Reference: 22/01623/FLL: Notice of Review. Dear Secretary, Local Review Body, Further to the letter received from Perth & Kinross Council Community Services advising of the decision to refuse my application registered on 4th November 2022, this document together with the enclosed plans is provided as supporting information to the enclosed Notice of Review Form. We would also like to point out that the planning application was made by Christopher and Fiona Palmer and not by Christopher Palmer Associates. This is a domestic application relating to Apple Tree House and not the Studio at Apple Tree House. The reasons given for the refusal are: 1. The proposed development, by virtue of its design, finish, specification, configuration, location and extent of roof coverage, would have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area. 2. The proposed development, by virtue of its design, finish, specification, configuration, location and extent of roof coverage, would have a visually intrusive appearance and a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area. 309
Page 10
The application for solar pv installation at Apple Tree House. In a conscious effort to achieve and contribute to the national and global goals of energy efficiency we have already made the following improvements at Apple Tree House: • Installation of energy efficient central heating, • energy efficient lighting • enhanced loft insulation • upgraded double glazed windows Encouraged by the Scottish Government’s stated aims in mitigating climate change we now want to install a micro-renewable solar pv system on the roof at Apple Tree House. The house is ideally orientated to give us a southeast facing aspect suitable for a roof-mounted system. The system would include the roof mounted solar pv panels, internal battery storage and an ev charge point to maximize the energy saving potential. Whilst appreciating that the house is located in the Ross Conservation area we consider that a solar array can be installed on the roof without significant detrimental impact for the following reasons: • Unlike many of the houses in the Ross. Apple Tree House is set back from the public road within a mature garden and does not directly form part of the built street frontage. • The house was built in 1976. It is not in itself of particular conservation significance. It is of timber frame construction with composite board cladding under a concrete tile roof. • It is situated on the inside of a right angle corner and as such there are no long views of the property from the public road or neighbouring properties. An open view of the roof is limited to a short, (16mtre) section of the public road. • Approaching from the north there is no view of the south facing aspect of the house. There is therefore no detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area or visually intrusive appearance and detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area. 310
Page 11
• From the neighbouring property at Easter Ross there is a limited oblique view of the south-facing roof from the garden but not from the house. • Views of the roof from the corner in the road is partially screened by a hedge atop a wall and existing trees and shrubbery in the garden. In total this extends to approximately 35 metres, but with the open view only extending to 16 metres. We also consider that the most open view is not in the general ‘viewshed’ when travelling in either direction on the road. When passing the house from the north the view of the house is over the shoulder. When approaching around the corner from the southwest the view is partially screened by the wall, hedge and trees. • There is no view of the roof when approaching from the southwest on the Ross public road due to the approaching angle and screening by the adjacent property, Hawthorn Cottage. There is therefore no detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area or visually intrusive appearance and detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area. • There are limited views of the roof from the upper floor rear windows of Hawthorn Cottage, but again partially screened by existing trees. Our neighbour at Hawthorn Cottage is supportive of the proposal. • There is a limited view of the roof from the property at Mishnish, again partially screened by hedges, and trees. • The type of solar panel selected is back monocrystalline with no bright aluminium framing. These are fixed onto a dark grey coloured, Marley Double Roman concrete interlocking roof tiles and will therefore not stand out as a significantly contrasting colour. • The system is reversible. i.e, it can be removed without detriment to the building at the end of its life. We are currently seeking professional advice on the overall size of the installation and may be able to reduce the total number of panels to further mitigate any residual impact. Reference is made in the refusal letter to the Historic Environment Scotland documents “Managing Change in the Historic Environment: “Micro- 311
Page 12
Renewables”, Historic Environment Scotland “Managing Change in the Historic Environment: Roofs” Studying the HES Short Guide to Micro-Renewables the guide states: “ Renewable Technology should be considered as part of the hierarchical approach to achieve a built environment that is energy efficient and conscious of the carbon and resources that it uses.” The HES document states: “the energy we use in buildings accounts for approximately 40% of the UKs total carbon emissions and renewable energy is recognised as an integral part of mitigating the effects of Climate change”. HES states that there are 630 conservation areas in Scotland. “If carbon emissions from the built environment are to be reduced, energy use in traditional and historic buildings (and by definition conservation areas) must also be addressed”. It goes on to say: “ Reducing the amount of energy we use in buildings and encouraging users to generate their own energy with micro-renewable technologies will allow the existing built environment to pay a part in carbon reduction”. Under item 4.8 of the document HES states: “Through the centuries, our built heritage has seen a number of changes, including the installation of sanitation, electricity, central heating and disabled access. These changes have been necessary to ensure the survival and longevity of our buildings. The use of micro-renewables is perhaps another stage in building evolution. If our historic environment fails to meet the ever-increasing expectation for a cleaner and more energy efficient building stock, there is the potential for such buildings to fall out of everyday use. There is therefore, a very fine balance to be achieved between protecting the character and cultural significance of the historic environment and ensuring that it remains functional and can contribute to society for future generations. Under section 6, Minimising Impact, the guide states: “ There must be a balance between maintaining the historic integrity of the building (or conservation area) and ensuring its usefulness in the future. Any potential visual or physical effects which may negatively impact on this should be carefully addressed. Issues such as reversibility- the sensitive 312
Page 13
removal of a renewable system at the end of its life and ensuring that a buildings authenticity, historic fabric, and defining features are retained for future generations, are also important.” The HES Short Guide to Micro-Renewables also references the following Scottish Governments written aims: “to mitigate the effects of climate change and support a carbon conscious culture the Scottish Government has set world leading targets: to reduce Scotland’s greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050 (from 1990 levels), with an interim target of 42% by 2020”. The Scottish Governments 2020 Routemap for Renewable Energy in Scotland (2011) sets out a number of supporting targets: • 100% of electricity demand equivalent from renewables by 2020. • 11% heat demand from renewables by 2020. • at least 30% of overall energy demand from renewables by 2020. • 500MW from community and locally-owned renewables by 2020. Perth & Kinross Council Climate Action Plan states that: ‘Climate Change is a top priority for the Council. The Climate Action Plan has been developed to address the necessary action to make both Perth & Kinross Area and the Council itself net zero and climate resilient. It stresses the need for urgent action on climate change, the plan primarily focuses on the actions required in the near future, until 2024’. Under the heading of Buildings and Energy the Perth and Kinross Action Plan provides the Councils overall vision to ‘ensure we achieve a low carbon and climate resilient Perth & Kinross’. The plan identifies Energy and Buildings as a key area where we will have to make changes in order to tackle and adapt to climate change. The combined domestic (homes) and non-domestic buildings emissions made up 34% of total emissions in Perth & Kinross in 2019 Across Perth and Kinross the total emissions from domestic buildings is 266 ktCO2. United Nations international treaty: The 1.5 degrees Celsius limit became a legally binding international treaty on climate change adopted by 196 parties in Paris, on 12th December 2015 and entered into force on 4th November 2016. On 4th April 2022, a flagship UN report indicated that harmful carbon emissions from 2010-2019 have never been higher in human history is proof 313
Page 14
that the world is on a ‘fast track’ to disaster with scientists arguing that it’s ‘now or never’ to limit global warming to 1.5degrees C. We would appeal that in the light of the above that you would reconsider your decision to refuse this application and allow us to play a part in helping Perth & Kinross Council to meet it’s stated carbon reduction targets. Yours sincerely, Christopher Palmer. See attached Supporting Photographs and Visual Impact Plan 314
Page 15
View from Ross public road from north. No view of south facing roof with solar panels. No visual impact View from Ross public road from north. No view of south facing roof with solar panels. No visual impact. 315
Page 16
View from Ross public road from east. No view of south facing roof with solar panels. No visual impact. View from Ross grass verge adjacent to public road at corner. This is the most open view of the property from the public domain over a limited 16 metre section of road of roof with solar panels. This view is not in the direct viewshed of a pedestrian or vehicle travelling in either direction along the road. 316
Page 17
View from Ross public road and Mishnish from south. Limited view of roof with solar panels through boundary vegetation in winter, but not in summer. View from Ross public road from southwest. No view of roof with solar panels No visual impact. 317
Page 18
318
Page 19
8216 Ross Bridge Cottage Easter Ross Craigiebarn Oakbank View! eld Rossdhal Fieldside Rosslea The Stables Apple Tree House Rossearn Mishnish Yen-u-House Oakleigh Craigvannie Rossit South View Glasdale Riverside Cottages FB 61.6m Glasdale 61.6m Bridge of Ross BM 63.34m LB MS 59.5m 59.7m Sinks NORTH 0 100 200 300M Location of house within ownership boundary Mr & Mrs C F Palmer Apple Tree House, The Ross, Comrie, PH6 2JU Proposed Solar PV Installation Location Plan Drawing No: ATH.PV.001 Rev A Oct 2022 Scale 1:1,250 at A1 REVISIONS: Rev A 31.10.22: Planning Application boundary amended to include the cur(lage of the dwelling as a whole including associated garden ground. NOTES: See Drawing ATHPV.004 for Existing Layout See Drawing ATVPV.003 for Proposed Elevations See Drawing ATH..002 for Proosed Site Block Plan Planning Boundary for Solar Panels on House Roof includes the curtilage of the dwelling as a whole including associated garden ground. 319
Page 20
320
Page 21
321
Page 22
322
Page 23
323
Page 24
Solar Panels Solar Panels Easter Ross Oakbank Apple Tree House Rossearn Mishnish Part of Drumearn North 61.6m 0 10 20 30 40 50m Mr & Mrs C F Palmer Apple Tree House, The Ross, Comrie, PH6 2JU Proposed Solar PV Installation Drawing Title: Inward Views Visual Impact Drawing No: ATH.PV06 Rev Jan 2023 Scale 1:500 at A3 Status of Drawing: For Planning Ownership/ Planning Boundary Apple tree House Location of Proposed Solar Panels Existing Trees and boundary hedges Inward Views Section of public road from where roof is visible or partially visible. Most open view over a 16 metre distance Limited view of south facing roof from Easter Ross garden No view of south facing roof from Easter Ross house No view of south facing roof from north approach No view of south facing roof from southwest approach on Ross public road. Limited view of south facing roof from Mishnish, screening from apple tree Woodland Woodland South facing roof visible in all or in part from a 35 metre section of the Ross public Road Boundary wall and ivy hedge Boundary wall and ivy hedge Boundary wall and beech hedge Boundary wall and beech hedge Apple Tree House behind ivy hedge South facing roof visible from a short section (16 metres) of the Ross public road No view of south facing roof from north approach No view of south facing roof from Easter Ross house 324
Page 25
6305 Dalchalla Ross Bridge Cottage Easter Ross (Unlisted Building of Merit) Craigiebarn Oakbank Viewfield Rossdhal Earthquake House Cat C Listed Building (S) Drumearn (Cat B List Building) Semi-Derelict: at risk Balmoral Fieldside Rosslea The Stables Apple Tree House Rossearn Mishnish Earn View Oakleigh Craigvannie (Unlisted Building of Merit) Rossit Cottage Rossit The Ross 61.6m The Ross 61.6m Bridge ofRoss BM 63.34m LB MS 59.5m Well Mr & Mrs C F Palmer Apple Tree House, The Ross, Comrie, PH6 2JU Proposed Solar PV Installation Drawing Title: Ross Conservation Area Extract Drawing No: ATH.PV.007 Rev Jan 2023 Scale 1:1000 at A1 Status of Drawing: For Planning Apple Tree House Location within Ross Conservartion Area Key Views in Conservation Area Identified on Map 10 of PKC Comrie Conservation Area Appraisal (Sept 2010) KEY North 0 50 100 150m View south into Ross with Easter Ross on left. Apple Tree House screened by woodland on right. View to Drumearn from the Ross Conservation Area Identified Key View southwest into Ross (Hawthorn Cottage on Right) View northeast along Ross from Viewfield Apple Tree House set back from road edge See Also Drawing ATH.PV05: Visual Impact Key View southwest into Ross (Hawthorn Cottage on Right) 325
Page 26
326
Page 27
4(v)(b) LRB-2023-03 LRB-2023-03 22/01623/FLL – Installation of solar panels, Appletree House, The Ross, Comrie, Crieff, PH6 2JU PLANNING DECISION NOTICE REPORT OF HANDLING REFERENCE DOCUMENTS (part included in applicant’s submission, pages 319-320 and 322-323) 327
Page 28
328
Page 29
329
Page 30
330
Page 31
1 REPORT OF HANDLING DELEGATED REPORT Ref No 22/01623/FLL Ward No P6- Strathearn Due Determination Date 3rd January 2023 Draft Report Date 7th December 2022 Report Issued by KS Date 7th December 2022 PROPOSAL: Installation of solar panels LOCATION: Appletree House The Ross Comrie Crieff PH6 2JU SUMMARY: This report recommends refusal of the application as the development is considered to be contrary to the relevant provisions of the Development Plan and there are no material considerations apparent which justify setting aside the Development Plan. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Appletree House is a non-traditional detached two-storey dwellinghouse (circa 1973) which occupies a prominent street corner location in The Ross, within the Comrie conservation area. This application seeks detailed planning permission for the installation of a solar array on the principal (southeast) elevation. SITE HISTORY 00/00580/FUL Erection of a garden studio/office with integral garden shed and toilet Application Approved – 23 May 2000 18/00046/FLL Installation of replacement windows and roof tiles (in retrospect) Application Approved – 28 February 2018 PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION Pre application Reference: Not Applicable. NATIONAL POLICY AND GUIDANCE The Scottish Government expresses its planning policies through The National Planning Framework, the Scottish Planning Policy (SPP), Planning Advice Notes (PAN), Creating Places, Designing Streets, National Roads Development Guide and a series of Circulars. Scottish Planning Policy (2014): Conservation Areas (paragraph 143) “Proposals for development within conservation areas should preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area. Proposals that do not harm 331
Page 32
2 the character or appearance of the conservation area should be treated as preserving its character or appearance”. DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Development Plan for the area comprises the TAYplan Strategic Development Plan 2016-2036 and the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019). TAYplan Strategic Development Plan 2016 – 2036 - Approved October 2017 Policy 2: “Shaping Better Quality Places” states that proposals should be; “Place-led to deliver distinctive places by ensuring that the arrangement, layout, design, density and mix of development are shaped through incorporating and enhancing natural and historic assets, natural processes, the multiple roles of infrastructure and networks, and local design context”. Policy 9: “Managing TayPlan’s Assets” states that proposals should; “Safeguard the integrity of natural and historic assets, understanding and respecting the regional distinctiveness and scenic value of the TAYplan area through safeguarding the integrity of natural and historic assets, including… townscapes and historic buildings”. Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 – Adopted November 2019 The Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) is the most recent statement of Council policy and is augmented by Supplementary Guidance. The principal policies are: Policy 1A: Placemaking Policy 1B: Placemaking Policy 17: Residential Areas Policy 28A: Conservation Areas: New Development Policy 33A: New Proposals for Renewable and Low-Carbon Energy OTHER POLICIES Historic Environment Scotland "Managing Change in the Historic Environment: Micro-renewables" states that: “The use of renewable energy technology in the historic environment is supported where the character of the historic building or place can be protected through careful siting and design… Each micro-renewable technology has specific site requirements, and not all equipment is suitable in every case”. Historic Environment Scotland "Managing Change in the Historic Environment: Roofs" states that: 332
Page 33
3 “Collectively, roofscapes and skylines are often key features of historic cities, towns and villages… In considering how to alter a roof it is important to understand the impact of the works on the roof itself and the appearance of the building or street as a whole. The potential for cumulative effects of similar developments should also be considered”. Comrie Conservation Area Appraisal 2010 “A few small, modern houses have been inserted at the eastern end but these remain neutral in effect and have not significantly altered the character of the townscape”. INTERNAL COMMENTS Conservation Team While Appletree House is not a historic building and does not specifically contribute to the historic interest of the conservation area, its southeast elevation is prominent when viewed in the context of neighbouring historic buildings. It is particularly visible in key views of Easter Ross to the east. The proposed PV array would appear particularly visually intrusive in this respect, and would not meet requirements to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area. Consideration should be given to alternative renewable energy solutions. Structures and Flooding No response has been received, or is needed, in relation to the proposed development. Environmental Health (glint/glare) No objections. REPRESENTATIONS No letters of representation have been received in relation to this proposal. ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS Screening Opinion EIA Not Required Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Environmental Report Not Applicable Appropriate Assessment Habitats Regulations – AA Not Required Design Statement or Design and Access Statement Not Required Report on Impact or Potential Impact eg Flood Risk Assessment Not Required 333
Page 34
4 APPRAISAL Sections 25 and 37 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 require that planning decisions be made in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The Development Plan for the area comprises the approved TAYplan and the adopted LDP2. Section 64(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997 is relevant and requires planning authorities to pay special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the designated conservation area. The determining issues in this case are whether; the proposal complies with development plan policy; or if there are any other material considerations which justify a departure from policy. Policy Appraisal Alterations to an existing domestic dwellinghouse are generally considered to be acceptable in principle. Nevertheless, consideration must be given to the specific details of the proposed development, within the context of the application site, and whether it would have an adverse impact upon visual or residential amenity or the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. Design and Layout Appletree House is a non-traditional detached two-storey dwellinghouse (circa 1973) which occupies a prominent street corner location in The Ross, within the Comrie conservation area. This application seeks detailed planning permission for the installation of a solar array on the principal (southeast) elevation. The roof plane on the principal elevation is split by a chimney which projects from a position approximately two-thirds along its width. The solar panel array is therefore divided into two parts, one which is two panels high and six panels in width and the other is two panels high and three panels in width, providing a total of 18 panels. The panels would stretch from the roof’s ridge line to the gutter and almost the entire width of the building. Only the outer periphery to each side of the roof, and a perimeter around the chimney, would remain exposed. Visual Amenity and Conservation Considerations As noted above, Appletree House sits in a prominent street corner location, which makes it highly prominent in the street-scene. In a departure from the traditional materials which typically characterise the conservation area, the walls of Appletree House have coloured horizontal cladding and its roof is covered in recessively coloured concrete tiles. The proposed solar panels would dominate and overwhelm the roof, introducing modern technology which has an uncharacteristic appearance over the majority its surface, rather than leaving the recessively coloured roof tiles exposed. As noted by 334
Page 35
5 the Council’s Conservation Planner, this would result in a particularly visually intrusive appearance, and it would have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area. The introduction of renewable energy generation would undoubtedly make a positive contribution towards the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and associated climate change impacts. However, this does not outweigh the harm that the proposal would cause to the heritage sensitivities in the surrounding built environment. Approval would therefore be contrary to paragraph 143 of Scottish Planning Policy, Historic Environment Scotland "Managing Change in the Historic Environment: Micro-renewables", Historic Environment Scotland "Managing Change in the Historic Environment: Roofs", Policies 2 and 9 of TayPlan 2017 and Policies 1A, 1Bc, 17c and 28A of Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2, 2019, which seek to ensure that development contributes positively to its surroundings in order to respect the character and amenity of the place and the character and appearance of the conservation area. Residential Amenity Given the height, orientation and position of the proposed solar array in relation to surrounding neighbouring properties, it is unlikely that residential amenity would be adversely affected by glint or glare. Developer Contributions The Developer Contributions Guidance is not applicable to this application and therefore no contributions are required in this instance. Economic Impact The economic impact of the proposal is likely to be minimal and limited to the construction phase of the development. PLANNING OBLIGATIONS AND LEGAL AGREEMENTS None required. DIRECTION BY SCOTTISH MINISTERS None applicable to this proposal. CONCLUSION AND REASONS FOR DECISION To conclude, the application must be determined in accordance with the adopted Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this respect, the proposal is considered to be contrary to the Development Plan. Account has been taken of the relevant material considerations and none has been found that would justify overriding the adopted Development Plan. Accordingly, the proposal is refused on the grounds identified below. 335
Page 36
6 Conditions and Reasons 1 The proposed development, by virtue of its design, finish, specification, configuration, location and extent of roof coverage, would have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area. Approval would therefore be contrary to Section 64(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997, which requires the Council to have special regard to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the designated conservation area. 2 The proposed development, by virtue of its design, specification, configuration, location and extent of roof coverage, would have a visually intrusive appearance and a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the conservation area. Approval would therefore be contrary to paragraph 143 of Scottish Planning Policy, Historic Environment Scotland "Managing Change in the Historic Environment: Micro-renewables", Historic Environment Scotland "Managing Change in the Historic Environment: Roofs", Policies 2 and 9 of TayPlan 2017 and Policies 1A, 1Bc, 17c, 28A and 33A of Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2, 2019, which seek to ensure that development contributes positively to its surroundings in order to respect the character and amenity of the place and the character and appearance of the conservation area. Justification The proposal is not in accordance with the Development Plan and there are no material reasons which justify departing from the Development Plan. Informative Notes Not Applicable. Procedural Notes Not Applicable. PLANS AND DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THIS DECISION 01 02 03 04 05 336
Page 37
337
Page 38
338
Page 39
4(v)(c) LRB-2023-03 LRB-2023-03 22/01623/FLL – Installation of solar panels, Appletree House, The Ross, Comrie, Crieff, PH6 2JU REPRESENTATIONS 339
Page 40
340
Page 41
M e m o r To Development Management & Building Standards Service Manager Your ref 22/01623/FLL Date 24 November 2022 Communities a n d u m From Regulatory Services Manager Our ref LRE Tel No Pullar House, 35 Kinnoull Street, Perth PH1 5G Consultation on an Application for Planning Permission 22/01623/FLLRE: Installation of solar panels, Appletree House, The Ross, Comrie, Crieff for Christopher Palmer Associates I refer to your letter dated 8 November 2022 in connection with the above application and have the following comments to make. Environmental Health Recommendation I have no adverse comments to make in relation to the application. Comments This application is for the installation of solar photovoltaic panels that are to be roof mounted on the southeast elevation of the dwellinghouse. The PagerPower Solar Photovoltaic and Building Development - Glint and Glare 2021 Guidance states that residential receptors to the East and West can be affected by glint and glare. Given the orentation and the size of the solar array and that this is a domestic insallation at roof height I do not foresee glint or glare from the installation affecting the residential amenity of neighbouring properties. Therefore, I have no adverse comments to make in relation to the solar photovoltaic panels. 341
Page 42
342
Page 43
Comments to the Development Quality Manager on a Planning Application Planning Application ref. 22/01623/FLL Comments provided by Diane Barbary Service/Section Conservation Contact Details Description of Proposal Installation of solar panels Address of site Appletree House, The Ross, Comrie Comments on the proposal Appletree House is an unlisted building in the Comrie Conservation Area. While Appletree House is not a historic building and does not specifically contribute to the historic interest of the conservation area, its southeast elevation is prominent when viewed in the context of neighbouring historic buildings. It is particularly visible in key views of Easter Ross to the east. The proposed PV array would appear particularly visually intrusive in this respect, and would not meet requirements to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area. Consideration should be given to alternative renewable energy solutions. Recommended planning condition(s) Recommended informative(s) for applicant Date comments returned 01/12/2022 343
Page 44
344