Democracy Spraffa

Item 4(i) LRB-2022-49

Perth and Kinross Council · 16 January 2023
Back to Local Review Body — 16 January 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

4(i)
LRB-2022-49
LRB-2022-49
21/02195/FLL - Erection of a dwellinghouse, land 30 metres
west of Wester Carmichael Cottage, Forgandenny Road,
Bridge of Earn, PH2 9EZ
INDEX
(a) Papers submitted by the Applicant (Pages 11-56)
(b) Decision Notice (Pages 59-60)
Report of Handling (Pages 61-68)
Reference Documents (Pages 35-55 and 69-70)
(c) Representations (Pages 71-84)
9

Page 2

10

Page 3

4(i)(a)
LRB-2022-49
LRB-2022-49
21/02195/FLL - Erection of a dwellinghouse, land 30 metres
west of Wester Carmichael Cottage, Forgandenny Road,
Bridge of Earn, PH2 9EZ
PAPERS SUBMITTED
BY THE
APPLICANT
11

Page 4

12

Page 5

Page 1 of 5
Pullar House 35 Kinnoull Street Perth PH1 5GD  Tel: 01738 475300  Fax: 01738 475310  Email: onlineapps@pkc.gov.uk
Applications cannot be validated until all the necessary documentation has been submitted and the required fee has been paid.
Thank you for completing this application form:
ONLINE REFERENCE 100514035-002
The online reference is the unique reference for your online form only. The  Planning Authority will allocate an Application Number when
your form is validated. Please quote this reference if you need to contact the planning Authority about this application.
Applicant or Agent Details
Are you an applicant or an agent? * (An agent is an architect, consultant or someone else acting
on behalf of the applicant in connection with this application)  Applicant  Agent
Agent Details
Please enter Agent details
Company/Organisation:
Ref. Number: You must enter a Building Name or Number, or both: *
First Name: * Building Name:
Last Name: * Building Number:
Address 1
Telephone Number: * (Street): *
Extension Number: Address 2:
Mobile Number: Town/City: *
Fax Number: Country: *
Postcode: *
Email Address: *
Is the applicant an individual or an organisation/corporate entity? *
  Individual    Organisation/Corporate entity
Nicholas Lindsay Architects
NL
Architects
Baker Street
1
Suite 110, Castle House
01786 821 945
FK8 1AL
UK
Stirling
studio@nlarchitects.co.uk
13

Page 6

Applicant Details
Please enter Applicant details
Title: You must enter a Building Name or Number, or both: *
Other Title: Building Name:
First Name: * Building Number:
Address 1
Last Name: * (Street): *
Company/Organisation Address 2:
Telephone Number: * Town/City: *
Extension Number: Country: *
Mobile Number: Postcode: *
Fax Number:
Email Address: *
Site Address Details
Planning Authority:
Full postal address of the site (including postcode where available):
Address 1: 
Address 2:
Address 3:
Address 4:
Address 5:
Town/City/Settlement:
Post Code:
Please identify/describe the location of the site or sites
Northing Easting
Ms
R
Perth and Kinross Council
McFadzean
Land adjacent to Wester Carmichael Cottage
717934 310837
14

Page 7

Page 3 of 5
Description of Proposal
Please provide a description of your proposal to which your review relates. The description should be the same as given in the
application form, or as amended with the agreement of the planning authority: *
(Max 500 characters)
Type of Application
What type of application did you submit to the planning authority? *
  Application for planning permission (including householder application but excluding application to work minerals).
  Application for planning permission in principle.
  Further application.
  Application for approval of matters specified in conditions.
What does your review relate to? *
  Refusal Notice.
 Grant of permission with Conditions imposed.
  No decision reached within the prescribed period (two months after validation date or any agreed extension) – deemed refusal.
Statement of reasons for seeking review
You must state in full, why you are a seeking a review of the planning authority’s decision (or failure to make a decision). Your statement
must set out all matters you consider require  to be taken into account in determining your review. If necessary this can be provided as a
separate document in the ‘Supporting Documents’ section: *  (Max 500 characters)
Note: you are unlikely to have a further opportunity to add to your statement of appeal at a later date, so it is essential that you produce
all of the information you want the decision-maker to take into account.
You should not however raise any new matter which was not before the planning authority at the time it decided your application (or at
the time expiry of the period of determination), unless you can demonstrate that the new matter could not have been raised before that
time or that it not being raised before that time is a consequence of exceptional circumstances.
Have you raised any matters which were not before the appointed officer  at the time the  Yes   No
Determination on your application was made? *
If yes, you should explain in the box below, why you are raising the new matter, why it was not raised with the appointed officer before
your application was determined and why you consider it should be considered in your review: * (Max 500 characters)
Erection of a dwellinghouse Land 30 Metres West Of Wester Carmichael Cottage Forgandenny Road Bridge Of Earn
Please refer to enclosed document titled '21-211 Appeal Supporting Information'
15

Page 8

Page 4 of 5
Please provide a list of all supporting documents, materials and evidence which you wish to submit with your notice of review and intend
to rely on in support of your review. You can attach these documents electronically later in the process: * (Max 500 characters)
Application Details
Please provide the application reference no. given to you by your planning
authority for your previous application.
What date was the application submitted to the planning authority? *
What date was the decision issued by the planning authority? *
Review Procedure
The Local Review Body will decide on the procedure to be used to determine your review and may at any time during the review
process require that further information or representations be made to enable them to determine the review. Further information may be
required by one or a combination of procedures, such as: written submissions; the holding of one or more hearing sessions and/or
inspecting the land which is the subject of the review case.
Can this review continue to a conclusion, in your opinion, based on a review of the relevant information provided by yourself and other
parties only,  without any further procedures? For example, written submission, hearing session, site inspection. *
 Yes   No
Please indicate what procedure (or combination of procedures) you think is most appropriate for the handling of your review. You may
select more than one option if you wish the review to be a combination of procedures.
Please select a further procedure *
Please explain in detail in your own words why this further procedure is required and the matters set out in your statement of appeal it
will deal with?  (Max 500 characters)
In the event that the Local Review Body appointed to consider your application decides to inspect the site, in your opinion:
Can the site be clearly seen from a road or public land? *  Yes   No
Is it possible for the site to be accessed safely and without barriers to entry? *  Yes    No
21-211 Appeal Supporting Information 21-211 PL-01 Location Plan 21-211 PL-02 Existing Block Plan 21-211 PL-03 Proposed
Block Plan 21-211 PL-04 Proposed Drawings 21-211 PL-05 Visuals 21-211 PL-06 Design Statement 21-211 PL-07 External Store
Elevation 21-211 PL-08 Streetscape
21/02195/FLL
25/05/2022
By means of inspection of the land to which the review relates
09/12/2021
The planning case officer did not visit site during this application. We believe this led to a failure to fully appreciate the sloping
topography of the site and contributed to a lack of understanding of the proposal within its setting.  We therefore recommend a
site inspection is carried out by the committee members so they can fully understand the proposals.
16

Page 9

Page 5 of 5
Checklist – Application for Notice of Review
Please complete the following checklist to make sure  you have provided all the necessary information in support of your appeal. Failure
to submit all this  information may result in your appeal  being deemed invalid.
Have you provided the name and address of the applicant?.  *  Yes   No
Have you provided the date and reference number of the application which is the subject of this  Yes   No
review? *
If you are the agent, acting on behalf of the applicant, have you provided details of your name  Yes   No   N/A
and address and indicated whether any notice or correspondence required in connection with the
review should be sent to you or the applicant? *
Have you provided a statement setting out your reasons for requiring a review and by what  Yes   No
procedure (or combination of procedures) you wish the review to be conducted? *
Note: You must state, in full, why you are seeking a review on your application. Your statement must set out all matters you consider
require to be taken into account in determining your review. You may not have a further opportunity to add to your statement of review
at a later date. It is therefore essential that you submit with your notice of review, all necessary information and evidence that you rely
on and wish the Local Review Body to consider as part of your review.
Please attach a copy of all documents, material and evidence which you intend to rely on  Yes   No
(e.g. plans and Drawings) which are now the subject of this review *
Note: Where the review relates to a further application e.g. renewal of planning permission or modification, variation or removal of a
planning condition or where it relates to an application for approval of matters specified in conditions, it is advisable to provide the
application reference number, approved plans and decision notice (if any) from the earlier consent.
Declare – Notice of Review
I/We the applicant/agent certify that this is an application for review on the grounds stated.
Declaration Name: Mr NL Architects
Declaration Date: 24/08/2022
17

Page 10

18

Page 11

19

Page 12

20

Page 13

21

Page 14

22

Page 15

23

Page 16

24

Page 17

25

Page 18

26

Page 19

27

Page 20

28

Page 21

29

Page 22

30

Page 23

31

Page 24

32

Page 25

33

Page 26

34

Page 27

35

Page 28

36

Page 29

37

Page 30

38

Page 31

39

Page 32

40

Page 33

41

Page 34

42

Page 35

43

Page 36

44

Page 37

45

Page 38

46

Page 39

47

Page 40

48

Page 41

49

Page 42

50

Page 43

51

Page 44

52

Page 45

53

Page 46

54

Page 47

55

Page 48

56

Page 49

4(i)(b)
LRB-2022-49
LRB-2022-49
21/02195/FLL - Erection of a dwellinghouse, land 30 metres
west of Wester Carmichael Cottage, Forgandenny Road,
Bridge of Earn, PH2 9EZ
PLANNING DECISION NOTICE
REPORT OF HANDLING
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS (part included in
applicant’s submission, pages 35-55)
57

Page 50

58

Page 51

Ms R McFadzean
c/o NL Architects
Nicholas Goward
48 West George Street
Glasgow
G2 1BP
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (SCOTLAND) ACT
Pullar House
35 Kinnoull Street
PERTH
PH1  5GD
Date of Notice:25th May 2022
Application Reference: 21/02195/FLL
I am directed by the Planning Authority under the Town and Country Planning (Scotland)
Acts currently in force, to refuse your application registered on 10th January 2022 for
Planning Permission for Erection of a dwellinghouse Land 30 Metres West Of Wester
Carmichael Cottage Forgandenny Road Bridge Of Earn
David Littlejohn
Head of Planning and Development
Reasons for Refusal
1.   The proposal is contrary to Policy 19 Housing in the Countryside of the Perth and
Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and the associated Housing in the
Countryside Supplementary Guidance 2020 (SG) as the scale/mass/design of the
dwelling proposed would not meet the criteria outlined under Category 1 which requires
that new housing respect the character, scale and form of the group, should not detract
from the visual amenity of the group and that a high standard of residential amenity has
not been provided for existing dwellings.
2.   The proposal is contrary to Policies 1A and 1B (Placemaking) of the Perth and Kinross
adopted Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and the Placemaking Supplementary
Guidance 2020, which all seek to ensure that all new developments contribute
positively to the quality of the surrounding built and natural environment, and that all
proposals complement its surroundings in terms of appearance, height, scale, massing,
materials, finishes and colours. Due to a combination of the scale, height, massing and
appearance of the dwelling compounded by the tapering nature of the site and siting
adjacent to a modest cottage the proposal is not considered to contribute positively to
the surrounding environment.
59

Page 52

Justification
The proposal is in accordance with the Development Plan and there are no material
reasons which justify departing from the Development Plan.
Notes
The plans and documents relating to this decision are listed below and are
displayed on Perth and Kinross Council’s website at www.pkc.gov.uk “Online
Planning Applications”
Plan Reference
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
60

Page 53

REPORT OF HANDLING  
DELEGATED REPORT  
Ref No 21/02195/FLL
Ward No P9- Almond And Earn
Due Determination Date 9th March 2022 
Draft Report Date 19th May 2022
Report Issued by JF Date20/05/22 
PROPOSAL:  Erection of a dwellinghouse    
LOCATION:  Land 30 Metres West Of Wester Carmichael Cottage
Forgandenny Road Bridge Of Earn  
SUMMARY:  
This report recommends refusal of the application as the development is considered
to be contrary to the relevant provisions of the Development Plan and there are no
material considerations apparent which justify setting aside the Development Plan.  
SITE VISIT:  
In line with established practices, the need to visit the application site has been
carefully considered by the case officer.  The application site and its context have
been viewed by a variety of remote and electronic means, such as aerial imagery
and Streetview, in addition to photographs submitted by interested parties. In
addition the site was visited in early 2020 during the consideration of the previous
application on the site.  
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS   
61

Page 54

BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 
The proposal is for the erection of a dwellinghouse at land west Of Wester
Carmichael Cottage, Forgandenny Road, Bridge Of Earn.  The site forms the garden
ground and is bound by the public road to the north, a dwelling to the east and
agricultural land to the west/south.   
The proposal is to erect a 1 ½ storey dwelling with extended rear elevation following
the linear style of development. In principle permission was granted on the site in
2020. 
SITE HISTORY 
20/00138/IPL Erection of a dwellinghouse (in principle) 30 March 2020 Application
Approved 
PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION 
Pre application Reference: N/A 
NATIONAL POLICY AND GUIDANCE 
The Scottish Government expresses its planning policies through The National
Planning Framework, the Scottish Planning Policy (SPP), Planning Advice Notes
(PAN), Creating Places, Designing Streets, National Roads Development Guide and
a series of Circulars.   
62

Page 55

DEVELOPMENT PLAN 
The Development Plan for the area comprises the TAYplan Strategic Development
Plan 2016-2036 and the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019). 
TAYplan Strategic Development Plan 2016 – 2036 - Approved October 2017 
Whilst there are no specific policies or strategies directly relevant to this proposal the
overall vision of the TAYplan should be noted.  The vision states “By 2036 the
TAYplan area will be sustainable, more attractive, competitive and vibrant without
creating an unacceptable burden on our planet. The quality of life will make it a place
of first choice where more people choose to live, work, study and visit, and where
businesses choose to invest and create jobs.” 
Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 – Adopted November 2019 
The Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) is the most recent statement of Council policy
and is augmented by Supplementary Guidance. 
The principal policies are: 
Policy 1A: Placemaking  
Policy 1B: Placemaking  
Policy 5: Infrastructure Contributions  
Policy 19: Housing in the Countryside  
Policy 32: Embedding Low & Zero Carbon Generating Technologies in New
Development
Policy 53B: Water Environment and Drainage: Foul Drainage
Policy 53C: Water Environment and Drainage: Surface Water Drainage
Policy 53E: Water Environment and Drainage: Water Supply
Policy 60B: Transport Standards and Accessibility Requirements: New Development
Proposals 
OTHER POLICIES 
Placemaking Supplementary Guidance
Developer Contributions Supplementary Guidance
Housing in the Countryside Supplementary Guidance 
CONSULTATION  RESPONSES 
Development Contributions Officer Contribution required 
Conservation Team    No impact on setting LBC 
Transport Planning    No objection to formation of access 
Scottish Water    No objection 
63

Page 56

REPRESENTATIONS 
No letters received 
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS 
Screening Opinion  EIA Not Required
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA):
Environmental Report
Not applicable
Appropriate Assessment Habitats Regulations AA Not
Required
Design Statement or Design and Access
Statement
Submitted 
Report on Impact or Potential Impact eg Flood
Risk Assessment
Not Required 
APPRAISAL 
Sections 25 and 37 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997
require that planning decisions be made in accordance with the development plan
unless material considerations indicate otherwise.  The Development Plan for the
area comprises the approved TAYplan and the adopted LDP2. 
In this instance, section 14(2) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation
Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997 places a duty on planning authorities in determining such
an application as this to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the
building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which
it possesses. 
The determining issues in this case are whether; the proposal complies with
development plan policy; or if there are any other material considerations which
justify a departure from policy. 
Policy Appraisal 
The principle of development has been established on the site through the in
principle permission granted ref 20/00138/IPL.   
This application is to consider the detailed design of the proposals under Policy 1
Placemaking, Policy 19 Housing in the Countryside and the supplementary guidance
for both policies. 
The principle of development on the site was approved under Category 1 Building
Groups.  This category states in relation to detailed proposals that new housing
should respect the character, scale and form of the existing group, should not detract
from the visual amenity of the group when viewed from the wider landscape and that
a high standard of residential amenity will be provided for both existing and new
housing.  
64

Page 57

Policy 1 Placemaking states that the design, density and siting of development
should respect the character and amenity of the place. Development should
complement its surroundings in terms of appearance, height, scale, massing,
materials, finishes and colours.   
The site narrows forming a triangular plot at the end of a row of dwellings. The  row
tapers towards the site with the scale of development decreasing. The row ranges
from single storey dwellings which accommodate upper levels within steeper roof
pitches using dormers/rooflights to traditional single storey cottages with low pitched
roofs.  Whilst it is accepted a number of these dwelling feature more substantial rear
elevations on the road side they are overwhelming of modest scale. 
It is considered that the cumulative impact of different elements of the proposal
would not respect the character and amenity of the area. The dwelling is large 1 1/2
storey and is sited where adjacent dwellings are single storey in appearance.  The
site levels have been utilised to try and mitigate the taller scale of the development
so that the ground floor of the dwelling is partially screened by the higher road level
and site boundaries however the first floor of the dwelling will be fully visible.   The
site will also have a new access formed to the west this will require site clearance to
form an access ramp and visibility splays.  This will further open up the site where it
is currently contained and introduce large gable end view of the dwelling
compounding the scale. 
The agent has sought to address the height by submitting a street elevation plan. 
Whilst this shows that in long views the dwelling will not be significantly higher there
are still remaining concerns about the overall development within the site and how
the dwelling will sit beside the modest neighbouring cottage. 
In this case it is considered that the development as proposed does not respect the
character of development and it is considered that at this end of the row a more
modest approach to the design was required. 
Design and Layout 
The dwelling is 1 ½ storey with traditional proportions/materials and contemporary
design detailing.  The roadside elevation will have the ground floor mostly screened
with the 1st floor visible above the fence line.  The upper floor on the roadside
elevation has a narrow feature gable and rooflights which extend down to the wall
head. 
To the rear the overall mass of the dwelling is substantial with large amounts of full
height glazing and a projecting gable which links to a covered lower terrace and first
floor balcony. Whilst I accept that the agent has made an attempt to contain the large
detailed elevation to the rear the overall scale of the dwelling in combination with the
height and formation of the new access results in a dwelling of such a scale and
resulting design that which will jar with the existing modest traditional row of
cottages. 
As with the principle of development being established on the site it is considered
that a scaled back design could address concerns, but the agent has repeatedly
65

Page 58

chosen to justify individual design elements rather than address the overall scheme
in relation to the site characteristics. 
Residential Amenity 
In addition to concerns about the overall mass/height the dwelling is sited 2.2m from
the boundary with windows proposed at the first floor and a balcony at first floor. 
The agent has sought to address this by using an opaque glazing screens to the
balcony and opaque glass on the windows in the east elevation.  It is considered that
the impact of overlooking should be designed out of the dwelling rather than by the
inclusion of glazing which would need to be maintained in perpetuity. This adds to
the concern that the dwelling proposed is not the correct design solution of this site
which has a number of constraints. 
Roads and Access 
The development is proposed to be served by a new access formed to the west of
the plot.  Whilst Transport Planning have no objection the formation of the access as
parking and visibility have been shown the level changes will require engineering to
bridge the 1.8m difference between the road and site. As previously stated, the
opening up of the site to accommodate a single access instead of utilising the
access of the dwelling to the east will expose more of the large scale of the dwelling. 
Drainage and Flooding 
The site is not at risk of flooding. The plans detail the surface water outfall is to the
existing burn and the existing foul treatment plant next door (within the ownership of
the applicant) will be upgraded to accommodate the development. 
Conservation Considerations 
The neighbouring cottages are category Cs listed.  It is considered that the
development of the site would not have a detrimental impact on the immediate
setting of the listed buildings. 
Developer Contributions 
Developer contributions are applicable on this site and would have been required in
respect of education and transport infrastructure if the development had been
supported. 
Economic Impact 
The economic impact of the proposal is likely to be minimal and limited to the
construction phase of the development. 
VARIATION OF APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 32A 
This application was not varied prior to determination. 
66

Page 59

PLANNING OBLIGATIONS AND LEGAL AGREEMENTS 
None required.   
DIRECTION BY SCOTTISH MINISTERS 
None applicable to this proposal. 
CONCLUSION AND REASONS FOR DECISION 
To conclude, the application must be determined in accordance with the adopted
Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.  In this respect,
the proposal is considered to be contrary to the Development Plan.  Account has
been taken of the relevant material considerations and none has been found that
would justify overriding the adopted Development Plan. 
Accordingly the proposal is refused on the grounds identified below. 
Reasons 
1 The proposal is contrary to Policy 19 Housing in the Countryside of the Perth
and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and the associated Housing in the
Countryside Supplementary Guidance 2020 (SG) as the scale/mass/design of the
dwelling proposed would not meet the criteria outlined under Category 1 which
requires that new housing respect the character, scale and form of the group, should
not detract from the visual amenity of the group and that a high standard of
residential amenity has not been provided for existing dwellings. 
2 The proposal is contrary to Policies 1A and 1B (Placemaking) of the Perth and
Kinross adopted Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and the Placemaking
Supplementary Guidance 2020, which all seek to ensure that all new developments
contribute positively to the quality of the surrounding built and natural environment,
and that all proposals complement its surroundings in terms of appearance, height,
scale, massing, materials, finishes and colours. Due to a combination of the scale,
height, massing and appearance of the dwelling compounded by the tapering nature
of the site and siting adjacent to a modest cottage the proposal is not considered to
contribute positively to the surrounding environment. 
Justification 
The proposal is in accordance with the Development Plan and there are no material
reasons which justify departing from the Development Plan. 
Informatives 
N/A 
Procedural Notes 
Not Applicable. 
67

Page 60

PLANS AND DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THIS DECISION 
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09 
68

Page 61

3(5/,*+762/$5
4th Generation Module Series • Black
PLUS+ SERIES
Models available:
54 Cell 250w • 255w
60 Cell 250w • 285w • 300w
72 Cell 300w • 330w
Reliability • Creativity •$σRUGDELOLW\
EFFICIENCY
21.7%
CELL
UP TO
EFFICIENCY
18.44%
MODULE
UP TO
BLACK
CLASSIC
ALL
Approved by:
0$18)$&785,1*%$6(
3HUOLJKW6RODU&R/WG
0X\X$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ'LVWULFW
:HQOLQJ=KHMLDQJ
&KLQD
MHQQ\XN#SHUOLJKWFRP
*/2%$/0$5.(7,1*&(175(
3HUOLJKW6RODU&R/WG
(WKIORRU;LQMLQTLDR5G
3X'RQJ'LVWULFW6KDQJKDL
&KLQD
HQTXLU\#SHUOLJKWFRP
DISTRIBUTION PARTNER
Buy PV Direct Limited
Tindall Mill, Kirkgate,
Tydd St Giles, Wisbech,
Cambs, PE13 5NE
sales@buypvdirect.co.uk
• )LHOGUHSODFHDEOHGLRGHFRYHU
• /RZHUMXQFWLRQER[UXQQLQJWHPSHUDWXUH
• 8SJUDGDEOHWRDGGIXQFWLRQDOLW\
Cover upgrade options:
• 0RGXOHOHYHOPRQLWRULQJ
• 6DIHW\
• 2SWLPL]DWLRQ
• /RQJ6WULQJV
• $SSURYHGE\DOOPDMRULQYHUWHUPDQXIDFWXUHUV
• 0&6&HUWLILHG
• 3RVLWLYHRXWSXWWROHUDQFH
• )LUHVDIHW\FHUWLILHG
• 3,')UHHFHUWLILHG
• $PPRQLDFRUURVLRQUHVLVWDQFHFHUWLILHG
• 6DOWPLVWFRUURVLRQUHVLVWDQFHFHUWLILHG
• DFFUHGLWHGPRGXOHW\SHV
• :RUOGZLGHDFFUHGLWDWLRQ
3DVVLYDWHG(PLWWHU5HDU
&HOO7HFKQRORJ\
• 4XDOLW\*XDUDQWHHG
• <HDU:RUNPDQVKLS:DUUDQW\
• <HDU2XWSXW3HUIRUPDQFH:DUUDQW\
• !2XWSXWIRU<HDUV
• !2XWSXWIRU<HDUV
• 2YHU<HDUV0DQXIDFWXULQJ([SHULHQFH
Quality Guarantee
Classic All Black
Monocrystalline
Smart-Ready Junction box
More Efficient
PERC Cell Technology
4BB Cell
3/00%6HULHV
:HLJKW 1NJ
1640 mm
992 mm
3/00%6HULHV
:HLJKW 1NJ
1482 mm
992 mm
992 mm
1956 mm
3/00%6HULHV
:HLJKW 1NJ
+44 (0)1945 870818
www.buypvdirect.co.uk69

Page 62

YBPVD1
3RZHU7ROHUDQFH 
:RUNLQJ7HPSHUDWXUH ž&WRž&
0D[6\VWHP9ROWDJH 9'&
:LQG5DWLQJ 3D
+DLO5HVLVWDQFH PP#NPK
0D[)XVH5DWLQJ $PS
)UDPH7KLFNQHVV PPPP
&ODPSRQ/RQJRU6KRUWVLGHV
0$18)$&785,1*%$6(
3HUOLJKW6RODU&R/WG
0X\X$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ'LVWULFW
:HQOLQJ=KHMLDQJ
&KLQD
MHQQ\XN#SHUOLJKWFRP
*/2%$/0$5.(7,1*&(175(
3HUOLJKW6RODU&R/WG
(WKIORRU;LQMLQTLDR5G
3X'RQJ'LVWULFW6KDQJKDL
&KLQD
HQTXLU\#SHUOLJKWFRP
DISTRIBUTION PARTNER
Buy PV Direct Limited
Tindall Mill, Kirkgate,
Tydd St Giles, Wisbech,
Cambs, PE13 5NE
sales@buypvdirect.co.uk
7HPSHUDWXUH&RHIILFLHQWƒ&

Page 63


9RF ,VF:S 9PS ,VF 12&7 3PD[ 9PS
&HOO
3/00%
6HULHV
    
    
    
    
        
    
    
        
    
(OHFWULFDO&KDUDFWHULVWLFV
,PS 9RF
6PDUW5HDG\
'LRGHFRYHU
x )LHOGUHSODFHDEOH
x 8SJUDGHDEOH
x +HDWGLVVLSDWLRQDZD\IURPWKHPRGXOH
x 76EDVHSODWH
x $SSOLFDEOHWRFRQYHQWLRQDODQGVPDUWPRGXOHV


1

1

6PDUW5HDG\
-XQFWLRQ BR[
NDPHSODWH
%DUFRGH
0& FRQQHFWRUV
IP

5HDUIUDPHPRXQWLQJKROH SRVLWLRQVFRPPRQWRDOOWKUHHPRGXOHVL]HV
0RXQWLQJKROHVL]H‘

AOO PHDVXUHPHQWV LQ PP
v E[WUHPHO\ UHOLDEOHVFUHZ
OHVV LQWHUFRQQHFWHGIUDPH
IRU ORQJWHUPIOH[LELOLW\ DQG
VWUHQJWK
v  PRXQWLQJ KROHV IRU GLUHFW
PRXQWLQJ RSWLRQ
v  LQEXLOW GUDLQDJH
ZDWHUVSRXWV
v  HDUWK JURXQG

Page 64

 SRLQWV
v THPSHUHG AR&

DQWLUHIOHFWLYH

Page 65

 IURQW JODVV

PERLIGHT 62/$5PLM SERIES
BLACK3/86
6HULHVSpecifications
PLM-250MB-54 Series
Frame Size:[PP
Frame Thickness: PP
Weight:NJ
Number of Cells:
Cell Type:0RQR3(5&
Power Outputs:
::
PLM-300MB-60 Series
Frame Size: [PP
Frame Thickness: PP
Weight:NJ
Number of Cells:
Cell Type:0RQR3(5&
Power Outputs:
::
PLM-330MB-72 Series
Frame Size: [PP
Frame Thickness: PP
Weight:NJ
Number of Cells: 
Cell Type: 0RQR3(5&
Power Outputs:
::
IEC61730 safety rated for high wind pressure, hail impact, snow load and fire.
Certified against Salt mist corrosion for coastal areas.
Certified against Ammonia corrosion for agricultural installations.
Produced in an environmentally friendly ISO 9001, OHSAS 18001 and
ISO 14000 certified manufacturing facility, which has been utilizing an
on-site 360kW Perlight Solar system since 2006.
&HOO
3/00%
6HULHV
&HOO
3/00%
6HULHV
+44 (0)1945 870818
www.buypvdirect.co.uk70

Page 66

4(i)(c)
LRB-2022-49
LRB-2022-49
21/02195/FLL - Erection of a dwellinghouse, land 30 metres
west of Wester Carmichael Cottage, Forgandenny Road,
Bridge of Earn, PH2 9EZ
REPRESENTATIONS
71

Page 67

72

Page 68

SW Public
General
Thursday, 27 January 2022 
Local Planner
Planning and Development
Perth and Kinross Council
Perth
PH1 5GD 
Dear Customer, 
30M W of Wester Carmichael Cottage, Forgandenny Road, Bridge Of Earn
Planning Ref: 21/02195/FLL
Our Ref: DSCAS-0057037-GCV
Proposal: Erection of a dwellinghouse 
Please quote our reference in all future correspondence 
Audit of Proposal
Scottish Water has no objection to this planning application; however, the applicant should
be aware that this does not confirm that the proposed development can currently be serviced
and would advise the following: 
Water Capacity Assessment 
Scottish Water has carried out a Capacity review and we can confirm the following: 
 There is currently sufficient capacity in the Turret Water Treatment Works to service
your development. However, please note that further investigations may be required
to be carried out once a formal application has been submitted to us. 
Waste Water Capacity Assessment 
 Unfortunately, according to our records there is no public Scottish Water, Waste
Water infrastructure within the vicinity of this proposed development therefore we
would advise applicant to investigate private treatment options. 
Development Operations
The Bridge
Buchanan Gate Business Park
Cumbernauld Road
Stepps
Glasgow
G33 6FB 
Development Operations
Freephone  Number - 0800 3890379
E-Mail - DevelopmentOperations@scottishwater.co.uk
www.scottishwater.co.uk
73

Page 69

SW Public
General
Please Note 
 The applicant should be aware that we are unable to reserve capacity at our water
and/or waste water treatment works for their proposed development. Once a formal
connection application is submitted to Scottish Water after full planning permission
has been granted, we will review the availability of capacity at that time and advise
the applicant accordingly. 
Asset Impact Assessment 
According to our records, the development proposals impact on existing Scottish Water
assets. 
The applicant must identify any potential conflicts with Scottish Water assets and contact our
Asset Impact Team via our Customer Portal to apply for a diversion. 
The applicant should be aware that any conflict with assets identified may be subject to
restrictions on proximity of construction. Please note the disclaimer at the end of this
response. 
Surface Water 
For reasons of sustainability and to protect our customers from potential future sewer
flooding, Scottish Water will not accept any surface water connections into our combined
sewer system. 
There may be limited exceptional circumstances where we would allow such a connection
for brownfield sites only, however this will require significant justification from the customer
taking account of various factors including legal, physical, and technical challenges. 
In order to avoid costs and delays where a surface water discharge to our combined sewer
system is anticipated, the developer should contact Scottish Water at the earliest opportunity
with strong evidence to support the intended drainage plan prior to making a connection
request. We will assess this evidence in a robust manner and provide a decision that reflects
the best option from environmental and customer perspectives. 
General notes: 
 Scottish Water asset plans can be obtained from our appointed asset plan providers: 
 Site Investigation Services (UK) Ltd
 Tel: 0333 123 1223  
 Email: sw@sisplan.co.uk
 www.sisplan.co.uk 
 Scottish Water’s current minimum level of service for water pressure is 1.0 bar or
10m head at the customer’s boundary internal outlet.  Any property which cannot be
adequately serviced from the available pressure may require private pumping
74

Page 70

SW Public
General
arrangements to be installed, subject to compliance with Water Byelaws. If the
developer wishes to enquire about Scottish Water’s procedure for checking the water
pressure in the area, then they should write to the Customer Connections department
at the above address. 
 If the connection to the public sewer and/or water main requires to be laid through
land out-with public ownership, the developer must provide evidence of formal
approval from the affected landowner(s) by way of a deed of servitude. 
 Scottish Water may only vest new water or waste water infrastructure which is to be
laid through land out with public ownership where a Deed of Servitude has been
obtained in our favour by the developer. 
 The developer should also be aware that Scottish Water requires land title to the
area of land where a pumping station and/or SUDS proposed to vest in Scottish
Water is constructed. 
 Please find information on how to submit application to Scottish Water at our
Customer Portal. 
Next Steps: 
 All Proposed Developments 
All proposed developments require to submit a Pre-Development Enquiry (PDE)
Form to be submitted directly to Scottish Water via our Customer Portal prior to any
formal Technical Application being submitted. This will allow us to fully appraise the
proposals. 
Where it is confirmed through the PDE process that mitigation works are necessary
to support a development, the cost of these works is to be met by the developer,
which Scottish Water can contribute towards through Reasonable Cost Contribution
regulations. 
 Non Domestic/Commercial Property: 
Since the introduction of the Water Services (Scotland) Act 2005 in April 2008 the
water industry in Scotland has opened to market competition for non-domestic
customers.  All Non-domestic Household customers now require a Licensed Provider
to act on their behalf for new water and waste water connections. Further details can
be obtained at www.scotlandontap.gov.uk 
 Trade Effluent Discharge from Non-Domestic Property: 
 Certain discharges from non-domestic premises may constitute a trade
effluent in terms of the Sewerage (Scotland) Act 1968.  Trade effluent arises
from activities including; manufacturing, production and engineering; vehicle,
plant and equipment washing, waste and leachate management. It covers
both large and small premises, including activities such as car washing and
75

Page 71

SW Public
General
launderettes. Activities not covered include hotels, caravan sites or
restaurants. 
 If you are in any doubt as to whether the discharge from your premises is
likely to be trade effluent, please contact us on 0800 778 0778 or email
TEQ@scottishwater.co.uk using the subject “Is this Trade Effluent?". 
Discharges that are deemed to be trade effluent need to apply separately for
permission to discharge to the sewerage system.  The forms and application
guidance notes can be found here.
 Trade effluent must never be discharged into surface water drainage systems
as these are solely for draining rainfall run off.
 For food services establishments, Scottish Water recommends a suitably
sized grease trap is fitted within the food preparation areas, so the
development complies with Standard 3.7 a) of the Building Standards
Technical Handbook and for best management and housekeeping practices
to be followed which prevent food waste, fat oil and grease from being
disposed into sinks and drains.
 The Waste (Scotland) Regulations which require all non-rural food
businesses, producing more than 50kg of food waste per week, to segregate
that waste for separate collection. The regulations also ban the use of food
waste disposal units that dispose of food waste to the public sewer. Further
information can be found at www.resourceefficientscotland.com 
I trust the above is acceptable however if you require any further information regarding this
matter please contact me on 0800 389 0379 or via the e-mail address below or at
planningconsultations@scottishwater.co.uk. 
Yours sincerely, 
Angela Allison
Development Services Analyst
PlanningConsultations@scottishwater.co.uk 
Scottish Water Disclaimer: 
“It is important to note that the information on any such plan provided on Scottish Water’s
infrastructure, is for indicative purposes only and its accuracy cannot be relied upon.  When the
exact location and the nature of the infrastructure on the plan is a material requirement then you
should undertake an appropriate site investigation to confirm its actual position in the ground and
to determine if it is suitable for its intended purpose.  By using the plan you agree that Scottish
Water will not be liable for any loss, damage or costs caused by relying upon it or from carrying
out any such site investigation."
76

Page 72

77

Page 73

78

Page 74

79

Page 75

80

Page 76

81

Page 77

82

Page 78

83

Page 79

84