Democracy Spraffa

Item 5(i) LRB-2022-23

Perth and Kinross Council · 20 December 2022
Back to Local Review Body — 20 December 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

5(i)
LRB-2022-23
LRB-2022-23
21/02290/IPL - Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle),
land 20 metres north of Powderwells Farm, New Alyth
INDEX
(a) Papers submitted by the Applicant (Pages 643- 678)
(b) Decision Notice (Pages 661-662)
Report of Handling (Pages 663-668)
Reference Documents (Pages 677 and 681-690)
(c) Representations (Pages 691-702)
(d) Further Information (Pages 703-748)
641

Page 2

642

Page 3

5(i)(a)
LRB-2022-23
LRB-2022-23
21/02290/IPL - Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle),
land 20 metres north of Powderwells Farm, New Alyth
PAPERS SUBMITTED
BY THE
APPLICANT
643

Page 4

644

Page 5

Page 1 of 5
Pullar House 35 Kinnoull Street Perth PH1 5GD  Tel: 01738 475300  Fax: 01738 475310  Email: onlineapps@pkc.gov.uk
Applications cannot be validated until all the necessary documentation has been submitted and the required fee has been paid.
Thank you for completing this application form:
ONLINE REFERENCE 100566850-001
The online reference is the unique reference for your online form only. The  Planning Authority will allocate an Application Number when
your form is validated. Please quote this reference if you need to contact the planning Authority about this application.
Applicant or Agent Details
Are you an applicant or an agent? * (An agent is an architect, consultant or someone else acting
on behalf of the applicant in connection with this application)  Applicant  Agent
Agent Details
Please enter Agent details
Company/Organisation:
Ref. Number: You must enter a Building Name or Number, or both: *
First Name: * Building Name:
Last Name: * Building Number:
Address 1
Telephone Number: * (Street): *
Extension Number: Address 2:
Mobile Number: Town/City: *
Fax Number: Country: *
Postcode: *
Email Address: *
Is the applicant an individual or an organisation/corporate entity? *
  Individual    Organisation/Corporate entity
Bidwells
Mark
Myles
Lamberkine Drive
Broxden House
01738  630666
PH1 1RA
Scotland
Perth07717 512203
mark.myles@bidwells.co.uk
645

Page 6

Page 2 of 5
Applicant Details
Please enter Applicant details
Title: You must enter a Building Name or Number, or both: *
Other Title: Building Name:
First Name: * Building Number:
Address 1
Last Name: * (Street): *
Company/Organisation Address 2:
Telephone Number: * Town/City: *
Extension Number: Country: *
Mobile Number: Postcode: *
Fax Number:
Email Address: *
Site Address Details
Planning Authority:
Full postal address of the site (including postcode where available):
Address 1: 
Address 2:
Address 3:
Address 4:
Address 5:
Town/City/Settlement:
Post Code:
Please identify/describe the location of the site or sites
Northing Easting
Other
Mr & Mrs
I
Perth and Kinross Council
Milne
Powderwells, by Alyth
747036 324636
646

Page 7

Page 3 of 5
Description of Proposal
Please provide a description of your proposal to which your review relates. The description should be the same as given in the
application form, or as amended with the agreement of the planning authority: *
(Max 500 characters)
Type of Application
What type of application did you submit to the planning authority? *
  Application for planning permission (including householder application but excluding application to work minerals).
  Application for planning permission in principle.
  Further application.
  Application for approval of matters specified in conditions.
What does your review relate to? *
  Refusal Notice.
 Grant of permission with Conditions imposed.
  No decision reached within the prescribed period (two months after validation date or any agreed extension) – deemed refusal.
Statement of reasons for seeking review
You must state in full, why you are a seeking a review of the planning authority’s decision (or failure to make a decision). Your statement
must set out all matters you consider require  to be taken into account in determining your review. If necessary this can be provided as a
separate document in the ‘Supporting Documents’ section: *  (Max 500 characters)
Note: you are unlikely to have a further opportunity to add to your statement of appeal at a later date, so it is essential that you produce
all of the information you want the decision-maker to take into account.
You should not however raise any new matter which was not before the planning authority at the time it decided your application (or at
the time expiry of the period of determination), unless you can demonstrate that the new matter could not have been raised before that
time or that it not being raised before that time is a consequence of exceptional circumstances.
Have you raised any matters which were not before the appointed officer  at the time the  Yes   No
Determination on your application was made? *
If yes, you should explain in the box below, why you are raising the new matter, why it was not raised with the appointed officer before
your application was determined and why you consider it should be considered in your review: * (Max 500 characters)
Erection of dwellinghouse in principle
Please refer to supporting appeal statement and photographs
647

Page 8

Page 4 of 5
Please provide a list of all supporting documents, materials and evidence which you wish to submit with your notice of review and intend
to rely on in support of your review. You can attach these documents electronically later in the process: * (Max 500 characters)
Application Details
Please provide the application reference no. given to you by your planning
authority for your previous application.
What date was the application submitted to the planning authority? *
What date was the decision issued by the planning authority? *
Review Procedure
The Local Review Body will decide on the procedure to be used to determine your review and may at any time during the review
process require that further information or representations be made to enable them to determine the review. Further information may be
required by one or a combination of procedures, such as: written submissions; the holding of one or more hearing sessions and/or
inspecting the land which is the subject of the review case.
Can this review continue to a conclusion, in your opinion, based on a review of the relevant information provided by yourself and other
parties only,  without any further procedures? For example, written submission, hearing session, site inspection. *
 Yes   No
Please indicate what procedure (or combination of procedures) you think is most appropriate for the handling of your review. You may
select more than one option if you wish the review to be a combination of procedures.
Please select a further procedure *
Please explain in detail in your own words why this further procedure is required and the matters set out in your statement of appeal it
will deal with?  (Max 500 characters)
In the event that the Local Review Body appointed to consider your application decides to inspect the site, in your opinion:
Can the site be clearly seen from a road or public land? *  Yes   No
Is it possible for the site to be accessed safely and without barriers to entry? *  Yes    No
Planning permission forms, location plan, decision notice, report of handling, photographs of site and statement in support of
appeal
21/02290/IPL
05/04/2022
By means of inspection of the land to which the review relates
06/01/2022
To allow the LRB members to see the status and condition of the brownfield site for themselves
648

Page 9

Page 5 of 5
Checklist – Application for Notice of Review
Please complete the following checklist to make sure  you have provided all the necessary information in support of your appeal. Failure
to submit all this  information may result in your appeal  being deemed invalid.
Have you provided the name and address of the applicant?.  *  Yes   No
Have you provided the date and reference number of the application which is the subject of this  Yes   No
review? *
If you are the agent, acting on behalf of the applicant, have you provided details of your name  Yes   No   N/A
and address and indicated whether any notice or correspondence required in connection with the
review should be sent to you or the applicant? *
Have you provided a statement setting out your reasons for requiring a review and by what  Yes   No
procedure (or combination of procedures) you wish the review to be conducted? *
Note: You must state, in full, why you are seeking a review on your application. Your statement must set out all matters you consider
require to be taken into account in determining your review. You may not have a further opportunity to add to your statement of review
at a later date. It is therefore essential that you submit with your notice of review, all necessary information and evidence that you rely
on and wish the Local Review Body to consider as part of your review.
Please attach a copy of all documents, material and evidence which you intend to rely on  Yes   No
(e.g. plans and Drawings) which are now the subject of this review *
Note: Where the review relates to a further application e.g. renewal of planning permission or modification, variation or removal of a
planning condition or where it relates to an application for approval of matters specified in conditions, it is advisable to provide the
application reference number, approved plans and decision notice (if any) from the earlier consent.
Declare – Notice of Review
I/We the applicant/agent certify that this is an application for review on the grounds stated.
Declaration Name: Mr Mark Myles
Declaration Date: 19/05/2022
649

Page 10

650

Page 11

651

Page 12

652

Page 13

653

Page 14

654

Page 15

655

Page 16

656

Page 17

657

Page 18

658

Page 19

659

Page 20

660

Page 21

661

Page 22

662

Page 23

1 
REPORT OF HANDLING 
DELEGATED REPORT 
Ref No 21/02290/IPL
Ward No P2- Strathmore
Due Determination Date 5th March 2022 
Draft Report Date 22nd March 2022
Report Issued by JF Date 22/03/2022 
PROPOSAL:  Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle)    
LOCATION:  Land 20 Metres North Of Powderwells Farm
New Alyth   
SUMMARY: 
This report recommends refusal of the application as the development is
considered to be contrary to the relevant provisions of the Development Plan
and there are no material considerations apparent which justify setting aside
the Development Plan. 
SITE VISIT: 
In line with established practices, the need to visit the application site has been
carefully considered by the case officer.  The application site and its context
have been viewed by a variety of remote and electronic means, such as aerial
imagery and Streetview, in addition to photographs submitted by interested
parties. 
This information has meant that, in this case, it is possible and appropriate to
determine this application without a physical visit as it provides an acceptable
basis on which to consider the potential impacts of this proposed
development. 
SITE  PHOTOGRAPHS 
BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
663

Page 24

2 
Powderwells Farm lies approximately 0.5km to the south east of New Alyth
and 1km to the south of Alyth.  To the south of the site there are existing
buildings comprising of a derelict traditional steading, ruinous stone walls and
a dwelling. To the east, north and west the site is bound by open farmland. 
The site consists of concrete hardstanding’s, foundations and substructures
associated with buildings formerly located on the site. 
SITE HISTORY 
N/A 
PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION 
Pre application Reference: 21/00457/PREAPP 
NATIONAL POLICY AND GUIDANCE 
The Scottish Government expresses its planning policies through The
National Planning Framework, the Scottish Planning Policy (SPP), Planning
Advice Notes (PAN), Creating Places, Designing Streets, National Roads
Development Guide and a series of Circulars.   
DEVELOPMENT PLAN 
The Development Plan for the area comprises the TAYplan Strategic
Development Plan 2016-2036 and the Perth and Kinross Local Development
Plan 2 (2019). 
TAYplan Strategic Development Plan 2016 – 2036 - Approved October
2017 
Whilst there are no specific policies or strategies directly relevant to this
proposal the overall vision of the TAYplan should be noted.  The vision states
“By 2036 the TAYplan area will be sustainable, more attractive, competitive
and vibrant without creating an unacceptable burden on our planet. The
quality of life will make it a place of first choice where more people choose to
live, work, study and visit, and where businesses choose to invest and create
jobs.” 
Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 – Adopted November 2019 
The Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) is the most recent statement of
Council policy and is augmented by Supplementary Guidance. 
The principal policies are: 
Policy 53B: Water Environment  and Drainage: Foul Drainage
664

Page 25

3 
Policy 53C: Water Environment  and Drainage: Surface Water Drainage
Policy 53E: Water Environment  and Drainage: Water Supply
Policy 1A: Placemaking  
Policy 1B: Placemaking  
Policy 5: Infrastructure Contributions  
Policy 19: Housing in the Countryside   
OTHER POLICIES 
Housing in the Countryside Supplementary Guidance 
Placemaking Supplementary Guidance 
Developer Contributions Supplementary Guidance 
CONSULTATION  RESPONSES 
Scottish Water     No objection 
Transport Planning     No objection 
Environmental Health (Contaminated Land) Condition required 
Development Contributions Officer Condition would be required 
REPRESENTATIONS 
No letters of representation received 
ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS 
Screening Opinion  EIA Not Required
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA):
Environmental Report
Not applicable
Appropriate Assessment Habitats Regulations AA Not
Required
Design Statement or Design and Access
Statement
Submitted
Report on Impact or Potential Impact eg Flood
Risk Assessment
Not Required 
APPRAISAL 
Sections 25 and 37 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997
require that planning decisions be made in accordance with the development
plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.  The Development
Plan for the area comprises the approved TAYplan and the adopted LDP2. 
665

Page 26

4 
The determining issues in this case are whether; the proposal complies with
development plan policy; or if there are any other material considerations
which justify a departure from policy. 
Policy Appraisal 
Policy 19 - Housing in the Countryside and the Supplementary Guidance
2020, notes that opportunities exist for housing in rural areas to support the
viability of communities, meet development needs in appropriate locations
while safeguarding the character of the countryside as well as ensuring that a
high standard of siting and design is achieved. The development of single
houses or groups of houses which fall within the six identified categories will
be supported. 
The Council will support proposals for the erection, or creation through
conversion, of single houses and groups of houses in the countryside which
fall into at least one of the following categories: 
1) Building Groups
2) Infill site
3) New houses in the countryside on defined categories of sites as set out in
section 3 of the Supplementary Guidance
4) Renovation or replacement of houses
5) Conversion or replacement of redundant non-domestic buildings
6) Development on rural brownfield land
Design and Layout 
The supporting statement and follow up discussions with the agent maintain
that the development of the site meets the definition of Derelict land which
was at one time occupied by buildings or structures but these have now been
removed.  The policy follows on to state OR land directly linked to former
buildings or structures which has been so damaged by a former use that it
cannot be left to naturalise or be reused for another purpose without first
being improved. 
The agent considers the emphasis on the OR in the definition splits the
consideration of the site for policy, the following section covers when
development will be permitted.  This section doesn’t distinguish and applies to
all brownfield land. 
From the photographs submitted it is accepted that the site does appear to
have been largely cleared although some areas of concrete foundations and
brick walls remain, and this would comply with the definition of rural brownfield
land. No evidence, however, has been submitted that the site is contaminated
to the extent that it must be remediated, rather that the site is untidy and
would detract from the amenity and setting of the steading site. The intention
of category 6 is to allow development on cleared sites which have been
significantly degraded by a former use or activity to the extent that the
development of a house is the only means by which it is viable to remediate
the site. It is appreciated that the applicant may prefer to develop the site but 
666

Page 27

5 
unless evidence can be provided that demonstrates the site is in such a poor
condition that it requires to be remediated e.g. it’s condition is causing risk to
human health or the wider environment, then the development of a house
would meet that requirement of category 6. 
Residential Amenity 
The site sits out with the building group and is not bound by any existing
dwellings.  A dwelling could be accommodated within the site providing
adequate amenity and privacy. 
Roads and Access 
It is considered that an access to the site could be accommodated, and
Transport Planning note standard conditions should permission have been
granted.   
Drainage and Flooding 
No flood risk and no drainage considerations for the in principle application. 
Developer Contributions 
Developer contributions conditions would have been required if the principle of
development had been accepted. 
Economic Impact 
The economic impact of the proposal is likely to be minimal and limited to the
construction phase of the development. 
VARIATION OF APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 32A 
This application was not varied prior to determination. 
PLANNING OBLIGATIONS AND LEGAL AGREEMENTS 
None required.   
DIRECTION BY SCOTTISH MINISTERS 
None applicable to this proposal. 
CONCLUSION AND REASONS FOR DECISION 
To conclude, the application must be determined in accordance with the
adopted Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. 
In this respect, the proposal is considered to be contrary to the Development
Plan.  Account has been taken of the relevant material considerations and
667

Page 28

6 
none has been found that would justify overriding the adopted Development
Plan. 
Accordingly the proposal is refused on the grounds identified below. 
Reasons 
1 The proposal is contrary to Policy 19 Housing in the Countryside of the
Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and the associated
Housing in the Countryside Supplementary Guidance (March 2020) as it does
not meet any of the criteria within the categories: 1) Building Groups, 2) Infill
sites, 3) New houses in the open countryside, 4) Renovation or replacement
of houses, 5) Conversion or replacement of redundant non-domestic buildings
and 6) Development on rural brownfield land.  In particular the site although
being formally developed does not meet the definition of rural brownfield land
outlined in Category 6. 
Justification 
The proposal is not in accordance with the Development Plan and there are
no material reasons which justify departing from the Development Plan. 
Informatives 
N/A 
Procedural Notes 
Not Applicable. 
PLANS AND DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THIS DECISION 
01
02 
668

Page 29

669

Page 30

670

Page 31

671

Page 32

672

Page 33

673

Page 34

674

Page 35

675

Page 36

676

Page 37

677

Page 38

678

Page 39

5(i)(b)
LRB-2022-23
LRB-2022-23
21/02290/IPL - Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle),
land 20 metres north of Powderwells Farm, New Alyth
PLANNING DECISION NOTICE (included in
applicant’s submission, pages 661-662)
REPORT OF HANDLING (included in applicant’s
submission, pages 661-662)
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS (part included in
applicant’s submission, page 677)
679

Page 40

680

Page 41

681

Page 42

682

Page 43

683

Page 44

684

Page 45

685

Page 46

686

Page 47

687

Page 48

688

Page 49

689

Page 50

690

Page 51

5(i)(c)
LRB-2022-23
LRB-2022-23
21/02290/IPL - Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle),
land 20 metres north of Powderwells Farm, New Alyth
REPRESENTATIONS
691

Page 52

692

Page 53

693

Page 54

694

Page 55

695

Page 56

696

Page 57

697

Page 58

698

Page 59

699

Page 60

700

Page 61

701

Page 62

702

Page 63

5(i)(d)
LRB-2022-23
LRB-2022-23
21/02290/IPL - Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle),
land 20 metres north of Powderwells Farm, New Alyth
FURTHER INFORMATION
703

Page 64

704

Page 65

1
CDS Planning Local Review Body
From: Mark Myles <mark.myles@bidwells.co.uk>
Sent: 20 September 2022 11:19
To: CDS Planning Local Review Body
Cc: Joan Milne
Subject: LRB-2022-23 - Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle) on land 20 metres north of
Powderwells Farm, New Alyth (21/02290/IPL)
Attachments: 603517-REP-0001-01.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from an external organisation. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open
attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Sir/Madam
I refer to the above Notice of Review appeal which was considered at the Local Review Body (LRB) meeting on 16
August 2022.
In their discussion and consideration of this Notice of Review appeal, it was clear that the LRB had originally indicated
their willingness to support the appeal (on a majority decision) and allow planning permission in principle. However
the Legal Adviser to the LRB then suggested that it would be more prudent for the LRB to defer their consideration of
the appeal pending the submission of a contamination report that addressed the matters set out in the consultation
response from the council’s Regulatory Services Manager dated 4th February 2022. This was despite the fact that the
consultation response clearly indicated that the council’s standard condition EH41 (requiring a Phase 1 Desk Study)
could be applied to any consent i.e.
‘Prior to the commencement of works on site, an evaluation for the potential of the site to be affected by
contamination by a previous use should be undertaken and as a minimum, a Preliminary Risk Assessment (Phase 1
Desk Study) will be submitted for consideration by the Council as Planning Authority. If after the preliminary risk
assessment identifies the need for further assessment, an intrusive investigation should be undertaken to identify; 
I. the nature, extent and type(s) of contamination on the site 
II. measures to treat/remove contamination to ensure the site is fit for the use proposed 
III. measures to deal with contamination during construction works 
IV. condition of the site on completion of decontamination measures. 
Prior to the completion or bringing into use of any part of the development the agreed measures to decontaminate the
site shall be fully implemented as approved by the Council as Planning Authority. Validation that the scheme has
been fully implemented must also be submitted to the Council as Planning Authority.’
We also note that the advice and procedure that’s been followed by the LRB above is the complete opposite to the
procedure that the LRB took when they allowed an appeal for planning permission in principle to erect a house on a
site at Broomhill Farm Cottage, Forteviot (LRB 2021/49) at their meeting on 8 March 2022. In that case the decision
notice was issued on 10 June 2022 and it is clear that an almost identically worded planning condition to deal with any
contamination found on the site was included on the PPP.
We are therefore of the view that the LRB were perfectly within their powers to allow our clients appeal (as was
evidently their original intention) subject to the inclusion of the above standard condition to deal with any
contamination on the site, along with any other conditions that may have been considered necessary.
Notwithstanding the above and the additional cost to our clients, we now attach a copy of a Phase 1 Environmental
Report that’s been prepared by Allen Gordon in support of the appeal.
In the circumstances I would therefore be grateful if this case could be referred back to the earliest LRB for their
further consideration, in anticipation that the attached additional report will allow the LRB to support this appeal
subject to appropriate conditions.
I look forward to hearing from you on the above.
Many thanks
705

Page 66

706

Page 67

Allen Gordon LLP
Unit 3, Saltire House
Whitefriars Crescent, Perth
PH2 0PA
t. 01738 639881
e. perth@allengordon.co.uk 
Client:
Mrs J Milne
Dervaig
Blairgowrie
Perthshire
PH11 8HE 
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 
POWDERWELLS, ALYTH, PERTHSHIRE
PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT 
Report Ref. 603517-REP-0001-01 
Date  16.09.2022 
707

Page 68

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report  
16.09.2022 
Issue and Revision Record 
Rev Date Originated Checked Approved Description 
01  16.09.22  GF  GJD  GJD  First Issue 
Unit 3, Saltire House
Whitefriars Crescent, Perth
PH2 0PA 
8 Ardross Street
Inverness
IV3 5NN 
Springfield House
Laurelhill Business Park
Stirling
FK7 9JQ   
t. (01738) 639881 t. (01463) 236516 t. (01786) 406576
e. perth@allengordon.co.uk e. inverness@allengordon.co.uk e. stirling@allengordon.co.uk 
This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and may not be relied upon or used in relation to any other
project without the prior written authority of Allen Gordon LLP. Allen Gordon accept no responsibility or liability for any consequences of this
document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying upon the document
for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be deemed to have agreed, to indemnify Allen Gordon for any and all resulting
loss or damage. 
Allen Gordon accept no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. 
No alterations may be made to this report without the prior approval of Allen Gordon. 
708

Page 69

09.06.22
Contents 
1 Introduction 1
2 Site Details 1
3 Appraisal of Existing Information 2
4 Environmental Setting 4
5 Initial Conceptual Site Model 5
6 Preliminary Risk Assessment 6
7 Conclusion 8
8 Appendices 9     
Tables 
Table 1 Historical Site Summary
Table 2 Probability of Risk Being Realised
Table 3 Consequence of Risk Being Realised
Table 4 Assessed Risk
Table 5 Risk Classification
Table 6 Risk Assessment
Table 7 Intrusive Sampling Plan 
Appendices 
Appendix A -  Site Location Plan
Appendix B -  Preliminary Conceptual Site Model
Appendix C -  Envirocheck Historic Maps
Appendix D -  SEPA Flood Map
Appendix E -  Coal Authority Map Extract
Appendix F -  UK Maps of Radon
Appendix G -  BGS Superficial Geology
Appendix H -  BGS Bedrock and Faults 
709

Page 70

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 1 16.09.2022
1 Introduction 
Allen Gordon LLP were appointed to provide a Phase 1 Environmental Report for a proposed new
residential development at Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire. 
The aim of this study was to assess the likely ground conditions within the subject area and to
evaluate the potential impact of ground conditions on the development. The objectives included: 
• To establish the documented geological conditions in the vicinity of the site and the
surrounding area.
• To provide preliminary comment in relation to the potential presence of
contamination within the site.
• To provide a preliminary assessment of any potential mineral instability constraints
based on available documentary information.
• To comment upon any obvious restrictions to the development of the site from an
engineering perspective.
• To construct an initial conceptual site model, prepare a preliminary risk assessment
and scope intrusive site investigation works if required. 
The conceptual model will describe the characteristics of the site and identify the possible
pollution linkages, a linkage being the relationship between a contaminant, a receptor capable of
being harmed and a pathway capable of exposing a receptor to harm. Examples of receptors
include human health and ecosystems. 
The preliminary risk assessment will consider the probability of a receptor being exposed to a
contaminant and the severity of the consequences of such an event. 
The risk assessment will then be used to determine the level of risk of the site being
contaminated. The report will then make recommendations which may involve further site
investigation and geochemical testing, a remediation statement or a statement that the site can
be considered to be uncontaminated. 
2 Site Details 
2.01 Site Location & Access 
The site is located at Ordnance Survey Grid Reference NO 246 470 and the nearest postcode is
PH11 8NB. It is accessed by farm track from the east and west. The site occupies an area of
approximately 0.17 ha. 
The site is relatively flat. A location plan is included in Appendix A. 
2.02 Properties in Proximity 
The site is located approximately 0.5km southeast of the village of New Alyth and 1.5km south of
the town of Alyth.  Powderwells Farm lies directly across the access track to the south and a farm
cottage lies approximately 120m to the east. 
The access track is approximately 0.61km long and meets the public road at both ends
(approximately 380m to the east and 230m to the west of the site).  The A926 runs roughly
parallel to the access track, approximately 400m to the north.
710

Page 71

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 2 16.09.2022
2.03 Fuel Tanks and Drums 
There is no evidence or record of fuel tanks or drums in the area. 
2.04 Existing Sewerage 
There are no Scottish Water sewers within the vicinity of the site. 
3 Appraisal of Existing Information 
3.01 Information Sources 
The following sources of information have been used in the compilation of this report: 
 Envirocheck Historical Maps (Appendix C)
 SEPA Flood Map (Appendix D)
 Online Coal Authority Map (Appendix E)
 Online Indicative Atlas of Radon in Scotland (Appendix F)
 BGS Superficial Geology Map (Appendix G)
 BGS Bedrock Geology Map (Appendix H) 
3.02 Site History 
The history of the site was studied using historical maps of the area from 1865, 1867, 1898, 1900,
1901, 1902, 1927, 1938, 1959, 1973, 1977, 1995, 2006 and 2021.  The objective of this study was to
determine the former uses of the site and of the surrounding area (typically within 250m), and to
obtain any information which may identify potential constraints to its development.  The key
findings of our historical research are presented in Table 1. 
Powderwells Farm is shown from the earliest maps to the present day.  The maps also indicate
that the site was occupied by agricultural buildings from circa 1973 to 2007 
Historic site maps can be seen in Appendix C. 
711

Page 72

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 3 16.09.2022
Table 1 - Historical Site Summary
Map Edition and Scale  Location  Key Features 
Date: 1865 
Scale: 1: 2,500 
On site The site is open farmland. 
Off site Powderwells Farm is directly to the south of the proposed
site. There is a road approximately 230m to the east. The
surrounding land is predominately farmland. 
Date: 1867
Scale: 1: 10,560
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site A farm cottage is now shown approximately 120m to the
east.
Date: 1898 
Scale: 1: 2,500
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 1900
Scale: 1: 2,500
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 1901
Scale: 1: 10,560
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 1902
Scale: 1: 10,560
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 1927
Scale: 1: 10,560
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 1938
Scale: 1: 10,560
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 1959
Scale: 1: 10,000
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date:  1973
Scale: 1: 2,500
On site Agricultural buildings are shown on the site.
Off site Additional farm buildings have been constructed directly
to the south.
Date: 1977 
Scale: 1: 10,000
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 1995 
Scale: 1: 2,500
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 2000 
Scale: 1: 10,000
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 2006 
Scale: 1: 10,000
On site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition.
Date: 2021 
Scale: 1: 10,000
On site The agricultural buildings appear to have been removed
from the site.
Off site The map appears similar to the previous edition. 
3.03 Documented Geological Conditions 
Reference to published geological maps indicates that the superficial deposits are Till, Devensian
- Diamicton. Sedimentary superficial deposit formed between 116 and 11.8 thousand years
ago during the Quaternary period. 
The underlying bedrock is identified as Teith Sandstone Formation - Sandstone. Sedimentary
bedrock formed between 407.6 and 393.3 million years ago during the Devonian period. 
By inspection of the BGS online borehole map there are no borehole records within a 0.5km
radius of the site. 
712

Page 73

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 4 16.09.2022
3.04 Mining Conditions 
The online Coal Authority Interactive Map Viewer and database indicates that the site is not
located in an area where coal seams are likely to be present. 
Therefore, no further coal mining investigation is required.  An extract for the site is included in
Appendix E. 
3.05 Quarrying 
There is no evidence of the existence of quarries within a 500m radius of the site based on the
historical maps studied. 
3.06 Flooding, Hydrology and Hydrogeological Conditions 
Reference to the SEPA Indicative River and Coastal Flood Map shows that the site is not at risk
from fluvial (watercourse) or coastal flooding in a medium risk (0.5% annual exceedance
probability) event. The map shows that there is medium risk of pluvial (surface water) flooding in
three small, localised areas in the north of the site. 
The BGS database does not hold any record of water abstractions within 1km of the site. 
4 Environmental Setting 
4.01 General 
This report has been written in the context of a proposed residential development. Should any
other use be considered, a further review will be required to establish the baseline conditions. 
4.02 Chemical Contamination 
Based on a study of the history of the site, the presence of contamination on the site is possible. 
See Section 5 for further discussion. 
4.03 Ground Gas Emissions 
Based on a study of the history of the site, the presence of ground gas emissions on the site is
possible.  See Section 5 for further discussion. 
4.04 Radon 
With reference to the online Indicative Atlas of Radon in Scotland, the site lies within an area with
a maximum radon potential of less than 1%. Therefore, with reference to BR211 Radon: Guidance
on protective measures for new buildings (BRE, 2015), no additional radon protection measures
are required. 
4.05 Mining & Mineral Instability 
The publicly available information indicates that the site lies outwith areas known to be at risk
from mining or quarrying activities. Therefore, no further investigation of mineral instability is
required.
713

Page 74

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 5 16.09.2022
5 Initial Conceptual Site Model 
5.01 Characteristics of The Site 
Powderwells Farm appears on the historical maps from 1865 to the present day.  The site is part
of the farm and from around 1973 to 2007 was occupied by agricultural buildings. 
There is a possibility that naturally occurring substances may be present in the ground at levels
which could affect human health or influence building materials. Examples include sulphates and
arsenic. 
There are no recorded active water abstractions on or near the site. The site and surrounding
land are likely to provide baseflow to the River Isla and the underlying bedrock aquifers. 
5.02 Contaminant Sources 
The following are sources of contamination which could be present given current and historical
use:- 
• Fuel and oil spills from vehicles and small machinery;
• Naturally occurring elements and compounds;
• Naturally occurring ground gases;
• Fertiliser / pesticides;
• Debris from demolished buildings. 
5.03 Receptors 
The following receptors have been identified: 
• The health of future residents, construction workers and maintenance workers
• The water environment including groundwater, surface water and artificial drainage.
• Building materials and services such as concrete and water supply pipes 
5.04 Pathways 
The principal pathways exposing human health to risk are considered to be direct contact with
contaminated soil or leachate (leading to absorption through the skin or ingestion) and the
inhalation of dust or gases. 
There are considered to be two principal pathways exposing the water environment to risk. The
first of these is direct seepage to groundwater and the second is surface water runoff. 
Building materials and services may be exposed to contaminants through direct contact with the
soil and groundwater. 
5.05 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model 
A Preliminary CSM has been developed for the site and is presented in Appendix B. 
714

Page 75

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 6 16.09.2022
6 Preliminary Risk Assessment 
The preliminary risk assessment will consider the probability of a receptor being exposed to a
contaminant and the severity of the consequences of such as event. 
The probability shall be classified as follows: 
Table 2 - Probability of risk being realised
Classification Definition
High Likelihood There is pollutant linkage and an event would appear very likely in the short-term and
almost inevitable in the long-term.
Likely There is pollutant linkage and all the elements are present and in the right place which
means that it is probable that an event will occur. Circumstances are such that an event is
not inevitable, but possible in the short-term and likely over the long-term.
Low likelihood There is pollutant linkage and circumstances are possible under which an event could occur.
However, it is by no means certain that even over a long period such an event would take
place, and is less likely in the shorter term.
Unlikely  There is pollutant linkage but circumstances are such that it is improbable that an event
would occur even in the very long-term. 
The severity of consequences shall be classified as follows: 
Table 3 - Consequence of risk being realised
Classification Definition
Severe  Human health: Highly elevated concentrations likely to result in significant harm to human
health (e.g. death, disease, serious injury, genetic mutation).
Water environment: Persistent and/or significant effect on water quality; major impact on
amenity value or major damage to agriculture or commerce.
Building materials and services: Catastrophic damage to buildings or property.
Medium  Human health: Elevated concentrations which could result in significant harm to human
health (e.g. death, disease, serious injury, genetic mutation).
Water environment: Significant effect on water quality; reduction in amenity value or
significant damage to agriculture or commerce.
Building materials and services: Significant damage to buildings or property.
Mild  Human health: Exposure to humans unlikely to lead to significant harm; exposure could
lead to slight short-term effects (e.g. mild skin rash).
Water environment: Minimal or short-lived effect on water quality; marginal effect on
amenity value, agriculture or commerce.
Building materials and services: Minor damage to buildings or property (e.g. surface spalling
of concrete).
Minor  Human health: No measurable effect on humans.
Water environment: Insubstantial pollution incident with no observed effect on water
quality.
Building materials and services: Repairable effects of damage to buildings, property and
services. 
The risk, taking into account probability and severity of consequence, will be classified as follows: 
Table 4 – Assessed Risk 
Severe Medium Mild Minor
High likelihood Very high risk High risk Moderate risk Low risk
Likely High risk Moderate risk Moderate/low risk Low risk
Low likelihood Moderate risk Moderate/low risk Low risk Very low risk
Unlikely Moderate/low risk Low risk Very low risk Very low risk 
Where the classifications can be described as follows:
715

Page 76

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 7 16.09.2022
Table 5 - Risk classification
Risk classification
definitions
Definition
High risk  Harm is likely to arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard at the site without
remediation action. Realisation of the risk is likely to present a substantial liability to the
site owner or occupiers. Investigation is required as a matter of urgency to clarify the risk.
Remediation works may be necessary in the short-term and are likely over the longer term.
Moderate risk  It is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard.
However, it is relatively unlikely that any such harm would be severe, and if any harm were
to occur it is more likely that the harm would be relatively mild. Further investigation work
is normally required to clarify the risk and to determine the potential liability to the site
owner or occupiers. Some remediation works may be required in the longer term.
Low risk  It is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor from an identified hazard, but it
is likely at worst that this harm if realised would normally be mild. It is unlikely that the site
owner or occupiers would face substantial liabilities from such a risk. Further, limited
investigative work to clarify the risk may be required. Any subsequent remediation works
are likely to be relatively limited.
Very low risk  It is possible that harm could arise to a designated receptor, but it is likely at worst that this
harm if realised would normally be mild or minor.
No potential risk: there is any potential risk if no pollution linkage has been established. 
Table 6 - Risk Assessment
Pollution Linkage   
Contaminant
source
Pathway Receptor Likelihood of
occurrence
Severity Assessed
risk
Fuel spill Direct contact or
inhalation Human health Low Mild Low
Natural
substances
Direct contact or
inhalation Human health Low Mild Low
Demolition
material /debris Direct Contact Human health Likely Medium Moderate
Fuel spill Direct seepage Water environment Low Minor Low
Fuel spill Surface water
runoff Water environment Low Minor Low
Fuel spill Direct contact Buildings and services Low Minor Low
Natural
substances Direct contact Buildings and services Low Minor Low 
The above table demonstrates that the assessed risk to receptors in general is classified as
moderate. 
716

Page 77

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 8 16.09.2022
7 Conclusion 
Overall, the risk from contamination has been assessed as moderate.  Therefore, it recommended
that geochemical testing be carried out to test for any contamination to the site. Intrusive
investigation will be required in due course for foundation design and to check from ground
water. Geochemical testing will also be required in due course for UKWIR. 
Table 7 - Intrusive sampling plan
Investigation
Method Justification/Description Number Depth
Range
Sample
Strategy /
Density
Comments
Trial Pits To determine the nature,
composition and distribution of
the superficial materials and to
obtain representative samples for
chemical analysis. 
10 0.2m to
1.0m
bgl
Non-targeted
general site
assessment. 
 Samples
obtained for
geochemical
analysis. 
The Phase 1 Report has not identified any constraints to the proposed development to the site. 
717

Page 78

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 9 16.09.2022
8 Appendices 
718

Page 79

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 10 16.09.2022
Appendix A – Site Location Plan 
719

Page 80

,'%*K
.<;6
0? ,8;84;#> 37::
$5<@7=76%
08;9>
;DT@FD >MOIP
(
9MTCDOTDJJP
9MTCDOTDJJP
1@OK /MQQ@FD
'&& (& )& *& +& ,& -& .& /& '&&
A9B5 ;>31B9>= ?;1=
'$'(+&
=>@B8
AIHOK 0 '0'& &&&
'&&&&
A9B5 ;>31B9>= <1? =>@B8
@5D9A9>=4E7$ =>$:>2 =>$
A31;5
3;95=B
?@>:53B
4@1E9=7 B9B;5
4@1E= 2F
0XILXYUX
7LHRYO 7H^HWKX
CTKLWNWUZTK AYWZJYZWLX
0KQHJLTY 0JYP[PYPLX
APYL @LXYWPJYPUTX
>YOLW %AVLJPM]&
AYWZJYZWHR8TXYHIPRPY]
6WUZTK 2UTKPYPUTX
2UTYHSPTHYPUT
1ZWPLK HTK >[LWOLHKALW[PJLX
@5D 41B5 2F 45B19;A:DNOMCRBQHML AU NDOKHPPHML ME 8OCL@LBD ;ROSDU
ML ADG@JE ME 37;8%V/OMTL /MNUOHFGQ #/MLQO@BQ
UD@O (& $% -JJ OHFGQP ODPDOSDC% 6HBDLPD LRKADO
'&&&'&')+%
0;; A8G4A B> 14 A8B4 D4@85843
B78A 3@0E8=6 8A 2>?F@867B
85 8= 3>C1B' ?;40A4 0A:
=>B5A 851;B8 1=4 A165BF =>B5A0
A97=96931=B @5A94C1; 81G1@4A ?@5A5=B 45A3@9?B9>= 13B9>=A % =>B5A0
@5D9A9>=A
?1?5@ A9G5
41B5?C@?>A5
XXX$JKQLROPSHTVQKTULMS$IR$WN B0"&'-,*# ,-&.//
45=8>;<?1@B=5@A89?1@389B53BA
3> =>B A20;4 5>@ 2>=AB@C2B8>= ?C@?>A4A
3@0E8=6A 0=3 0@278B42BC@0; A?4285820B8>=
B> 14 @403 8= 2>=9C=2B8>= E8B7 4=6=844@$A
<W # <WX <PRTL
*/*+-)(*)))) 0*
3LJ +*?RHTTPTN 0-,.*4E
7UZXPTN HY ?U\KLW\LRRX
@LKZTKHTY 1WU\TMPLRK APYLTW 0R]YO' 1RHPWNU\WPL
;UJ)+
APYL ;UJHYPUT <HVAPYL ;UJHYPUT ?RHT
720

Page 81

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 11 16.09.2022
Appendix B - Preliminary Conceptual Site Model 
721

Page 82

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 12 16.09.2022
Appendix C – Envirocheck Historic Maps 
722

Page 83

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Historical Map - Slice A
Ordnance Survey County Series 1:10,560 Ordnance Survey Plan 1:10,000 1:10,000 Raster Mapping
Historical Mapping Legends
Historical Mapping & Photography included:
Forfarshire
Perthshire
Perthshire
Forfarshire
Forfarshire
Perthshire
Ordnance Survey Plan
Ordnance Survey Plan
10K Raster Mapping
10K Raster Mapping
VectorMap Local
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,560
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1:10,000
1865
1867
1901 - 1902
1902 - 1903
1927
1938
1959
1977
2000 - 2001
2006
2021
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Mapping Type Scale Date Pg
723

Page 84

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Forfarshire
Published 1865
Source map scale - 1:10,560
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were
used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is
often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps
were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single
county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying
areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated
the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear
unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These
maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first
1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. The
revision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every
10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
724

Page 85

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 3 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Perthshire
Published 1867
Source map scale - 1:10,560
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were
used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is
often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps
were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single
county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying
areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated
the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear
unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These
maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first
1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. The
revision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every
10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
725

Page 86

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 4 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Perthshire
Published 1901 - 1902
Source map scale - 1:10,560
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were
used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is
often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps
were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single
county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying
areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated
the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear
unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These
maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first
1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. The
revision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every
10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
726

Page 87

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 5 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Forfarshire
Published 1902 - 1903
Source map scale - 1:10,560
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were
used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is
often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps
were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single
county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying
areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated
the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear
unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These
maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first
1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. The
revision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every
10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
727

Page 88

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 6 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Forfarshire
Published 1927
Source map scale - 1:10,560
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were
used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is
often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps
were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single
county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying
areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated
the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear
unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These
maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first
1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. The
revision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every
10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
728

Page 89

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 7 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Perthshire
Published 1938
Source map scale - 1:10,560
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were
used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is
often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps
were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single
county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying
areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated
the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear
unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These
maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first
1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. The
revision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every
10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
729

Page 90

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 8 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1959
Source map scale - 1:10,000
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were
used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is
often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps
were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single
county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying
areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated
the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear
unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These
maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first
1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. The
revision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every
10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
730

Page 91

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 9 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1977
Source map scale - 1:10,000
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas; these maps were
used to update the 1:10,560 maps. The published date given therefore is
often some years later than the surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps
were based on the Cassini Projection, with independent surveys of a single
county or group of counties, giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying
areas. In the late 1940`s, a Provisional Edition was produced, which updated
the 1:10,560 mapping from a number of sources. The maps appear
unfinished - with all military camps and other strategic sites removed. These
maps were initially overprinted with the National Grid. In 1970, the first
1:10,000 maps were produced using the Transverse Mercator Projection. The
revision process continued until recently, with new editions appearing every
10 years or so for urban areas.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
731

Page 92

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 10 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
10k Raster Mapping
Published 2000 - 2001
Source map scale - 1:10,000
The historical maps shown were produced from the Ordnance Survey`s
1:10,000 colour raster mapping. These maps are derived from Landplan
which replaced the old 1:10,000 maps originally published in 1970. The data
is highly detailed showing buildings, fences and field boundaries as well as all
roads, tracks and paths. Road names are also included together with the
relevant road number and classification. Boundary information depiction
includes county, unitary authority, district, civil parish and constituency.
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
732

Page 93

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 11 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
10k Raster Mapping
Published 2006
Source map scale - 1:10,000
The historical maps shown were produced from the Ordnance Survey`s
1:10,000 colour raster mapping. These maps are derived from Landplan
which replaced the old 1:10,000 maps originally published in 1970. The data
is highly detailed showing buildings, fences and field boundaries as well as all
roads, tracks and paths. Road names are also included together with the
relevant road number and classification. Boundary information depiction
includes county, unitary authority, district, civil parish and constituency.
dummy
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
733

Page 94

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
1000
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 12 of 12A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
VectorMap Local
Published 2021
Source map scale - 1:10,000
VectorMap Local (Raster) is Ordnance Survey's highest detailed 'backdrop'
mapping product. These maps are produced from OS's VectorMap Local, a
simple vector dataset at a nominal scale of 1:10,000, covering the whole of
Great Britain, that has been designed for creating graphical mapping. OS
VectorMap Local is derived from large-scale information surveyed at 1:1250
scale (covering major towns and cities),1:2500 scale (smaller towns, villages
and developed rural areas), and 1:10 000 scale (mountain, moorland and
river estuary areas).
Historical Map - Slice A
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
734

Page 95

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
100
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 1 of 7A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Historical Map - Segment A13
Ordnance Survey County Series and
Ordnance Survey Plan 1:2,500
Ordnance Survey Plan, Additional SIMs and
Supply of Unpublished Survey Information
1:2,500 and 1:1,250
Large-Scale National Grid Data 1:2,500 and
1:1,250
Historical Mapping Legends
Historical Mapping & Photography included:
Perthshire
Perthshire
Perthshire
Ordnance Survey Plan
Large-Scale National Grid Data
Historical Aerial Photography
1:2,500
1:2,500
1:2,500
1:2,500
1:2,500
1:2,500
1865
1898
1900
1973
1995
2007
2
3
4
5
6
7
Mapping Type Scale Date Pg
735

Page 96

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
100
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 2 of 7A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Perthshire
Published 1865
Source map scale - 1:2,500
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it
covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of Great
Britain. The published date given below is often some years later than the
surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini
Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties,
giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
736

Page 97

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
100
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 3 of 7A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Perthshire
Published 1898
Source map scale - 1:2,500
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it
covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of Great
Britain. The published date given below is often some years later than the
surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini
Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties,
giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
737

Page 98

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
100
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 4 of 7A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Perthshire
Published 1900
Source map scale - 1:2,500
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it
covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of Great
Britain. The published date given below is often some years later than the
surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini
Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties,
giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
738

Page 99

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
100
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 5 of 7A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Ordnance Survey Plan
Published 1973
Source map scale - 1:2,500
The historical maps shown were reproduced from maps predominantly held
at the scale adopted for England, Wales and Scotland in the 1840`s. In 1854
the 1:2,500 scale was adopted for mapping urban areas and by 1896 it
covered the whole of what were considered to be the cultivated parts of Great
Britain. The published date given below is often some years later than the
surveyed date. Before 1938, all OS maps were based on the Cassini
Projection, with independent surveys of a single county or group of counties,
giving rise to significant inaccuracies in outlying areas.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
739

Page 100

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
100
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 6 of 7A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Large-Scale National Grid Data
Published 1995
Source map scale - 1:2,500
'Large Scale National Grid Data' superseded SIM cards (Ordnance Survey's
'Survey of Information on Microfilm') in 1992, and continued to be produced
until 1999. These maps were the fore-runners of digital mapping and so
provide detailed information on houses and roads, but tend to show less
topographic features such as vegetation. These maps were produced at both
1:2,500 and 1:1,250 scales.
Historical Map - Segment A13
Map Name(s) and Date(s)
740

Page 101

Order Details
Site Details
Site at 324640, 747030
Order Number:
Customer Ref:
National Grid Reference:
Slice:
Site Area (Ha):
Search Buffer (m):
300442248_1_1
603517
324740, 747030
A
0.22
100
Tel:
Fax:
Web:
0844 844 9952
0844 844 9951
www.envirocheck.co.uk
Page 7 of 7A Landmark Information Group Service   v50.0 26-Aug-2022
Historical Aerial Photography
Published 2007
This aerial photography was produced by Getmapping, these vertical aerial
photographs provide a seamless, full colour survey of the whole of Great
Britain
Historical Aerial Photography - Segment A13
741

Page 102

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 13 16.09.2022
Appendix D - SEPA Flood Map 
Appendix E - Coal Authority Map Extract 
742

Page 103

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 14 16.09.2022
Appendix F - UK Maps of Radon 
Appendix G – BGS Superficial Geology 
743

Page 104

Proposed Residential Development at  Allen Gordon LLP
Powderwells, Alyth, Perthshire
Phase 1 Environmental Report
603517 15 16.09.2022
Appendix H – BGS Bedrock and Faults 
744

Page 105

1
CDS Planning Local Review Body
From: Joanne Ferguson
Sent: 05 December 2022 10:56
To: Jessica Guild; CDS Planning Local Review Body
Cc: Colin Elliott
Subject: FW: LRB - 21/02290/IPL Powderwells
Attachments: 301122 memo for LRB.doc
Jessica
Please find response attached from Contaminated Land Officer and based on this response please find my further
comment below related back to Category 6 of the Housing in the Countryside Policy.
Category 6 is in 3 parts (1)the definition of brownfield land, (2) when development will be permitted and (3)the
policy requirements.  
(1)The site was at one time occupied by buildings so therefore we move to the next part which defines when
development will be permitted.  (2)The policy is clear many sites which are defined as brownfield have little or no
environmental impact and can be left to return to a natural state over time and even on sites where contamination
is present they may not need remediated if there is no significant risk to human health or the wider environment.
This category of the policy is not intended to allow the redevelopment of sites like these, nor is it intended to permit
the redevelopment of sites for housing where buildings have simply been allowed to fall into disrepair. This category
is intended to allow small scale housing proposals on cleared sites which have been significantly degraded by a
former use or activity, and where the redevelopment of the site for housing is the only means by which it is viable to
remediate the site.
(3)The report submitted as considered by the Contaminated Land Officer does not provide the justification as
required by the policy.  It should also be noted that the report has not been accompanied by a remediation plan as
required by the policy the conclusion on page 7 of the report states The Phase 1 Report has not identified any
constraints to the proposed development to the site.
Regards 
Joanne Ferguson
Planning Officer
Development Management
Planning & Development 
Perth & Kinross Council
Pullar House
35 Kinnoull Street
Perth PH1 5GD
Web      www.pkc.gov.uk
Please do not print this email unless you really have to
Follow us on Twitter
745

Page 106

M e m o r  
To Development Management & Building  
Standards Service Manager
Your ref 21/02290/IPL
Date  30/11/2022
Communities
a n d u m
From  Regulatory Services Manager
Our ref  CHF
Pullar House, 35 Kinnoull Street, Perth, PH1 5GD
Consultation on an Application for Planning Permission
21/02290/IPL RE: Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle) at Land 60 Metres North of
Powderwells Farm New Alyth Blairgowrie for Mr & Mrs I Milne
Contaminated Land 
Comments
There is a legal definition of contaminated land – that which presents a significant risk to
human health and/or the environment which this site does not.  It is normal practice for rural
authorities to assign conditions on lower risk sites as the presence of contamination in the
ground needs to be determined and information obtained also influences design and
engineering aspects.
In the absence of soil analysis, there is no evidence to suggest that this particular
development differs from any other steading conversion in terms of potential risk of
contamination.
746

Page 107

1
CDS Planning Local Review Body
From: Mark Myles <mark.myles@bidwells.co.uk>
Sent: 07 December 2022 15:00
To: CDS Planning Local Review Body
Subject: RE: LRB-2022-23
CAUTION: This email originated from an external organisation. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open
attachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.
Thank you for your further email and letter of 6th December inviting our response to the additional comments received
from the council’s Contaminated Land Officer and Planning Service.
The Contaminated Land officer’s previous consultation response recommended a condition be applied to any
approval requiring a detailed evaluation of the site and is the point that we made in our previous response dated 20th
September.
The planning officer’s latest response implies that this is not a brownfield site because it can return to a natural state
over time. As stated previously it would have been helpful if the planning officer had actually visited the site during the
consideration of the application as the buildings on the site were removed over 20 years ago i.e. they haven’t been
removed recently or simply been allowed to deliberately fall into disrepair. 
The site therefore complies with the definition given in the supplementary guidance i.e. ‘derelict land which was at one
time occupied by buildings and structures but these have now been removed….and where significant areas of
hardstanding, foundation and substructures remain and could not be left to simply naturalise without first being
removed and the condition of the site improved.’
The planning officer states that this category of the policy is intended to allow small scale housing proposals on
cleared sites which have been significantly degraded by a former use or activity and where the redevelopment of the
site for housing is the only means by which it is viable to remediate the site. We totally agree. The existence of the
concrete foundations, hardstanding’s, small brick walls and metal rods across the site, which was cleared around 20
years ago, should provide any decision maker with sufficient evidence that this site will not naturalise itself over time,
and highlights precisely the reason why this site conforms to the stated policy requirements.
The Scottish Government will shortly adopt NPF4 and this will take precedence over LDP policy where there is any
conflict. Within NPF4, Policy 17 on Rural Housing is also likely to allow for the approval and ‘reuse of brownfield
land where a return to a natural state has not or will not happen without intervention’.
For these reasons and the reasons set out in our original appeal statement dated May 2022, and further response
dated 20th September, we would ask the LRB to allow this appeal and grant planning permission in principle.
Kind regards
Mark
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Mark Myles
Partner, Head of Planning Scotland
Broxden House, Lamberkine Drive, Perth, Scotland. PH1 1RA
DD: 01738 230154 | M: 07717 512203 | bidwells.co.uk
747

Page 108

748