Democracy Spraffa

(c) Representations (Pages 337-348)

Perth and Kinross Council · 23 October 2023
Back to Local Review Body — 23 October 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

4(iv)(c) 
LRB-2023-32 
LRB-2023-32 - 23/00453/FLL – Erection of a dwellinghouse,
land 35 metres east of Gateside Cottage, Forteviot 
REPRESENTATIONS

Page 2

No embedded text on this page.

Page 3

No embedded text on this page.

Page 4

No embedded text on this page.

Page 5

No embedded text on this page.

Page 6

No embedded text on this page.

Page 7

No embedded text on this page.

Page 8

No embedded text on this page.

Page 9

No embedded text on this page.

Page 10

No embedded text on this page.

Page 11

Mr Ian Mitchell (Objects)
Comment submitted date: Sun 14 May 2023
Whilst we are supportive of the applicants desire to build a sustainable and
energy efficient home, we have concerns with the proposed design of the
dwellinghouse. From reviewing the plans, the proposed dwellinghouse would be
virtually identical to *redacted* which was completed in 2022. The design of
*redacted* was a bespoke design which we worked with our architect and Perth
& Kinross planning department over the course of a number of years to agree
and implement. By erecting a near identical dwellinghouse in the adjacent field,
this would give the impression that *redacted* and the proposed dwelling are
part of a commercial development of homes. This was never the intention of the
*redacted* site - it was to be a single dwellinghouse design.
As noted, we are comfortable with the proposed erection of a dwellinghouse on
the applicant's site, but we ask that the design of the house be altered so as to
respect the originality of our design at *Redacted*. The design and structure of
*Redacted* was a personal process for us over many years. It was always
intended to be bespoke and not replicated for the purposes of a separate and
unrelated planning application.

Page 12

No embedded text on this page.