(c) Representations (Pages 319-334)
Perth and Kinross Council · 16 December 2024
Back to Local Review Body — 16 December 2024 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.
Page 1
4(iv)(c) LRB-2024-46 LRB-2024-46 24/01037/IPL - Erection of a dwellinghouse (in principle), land 25 metres south of 11 Kinfauns Holdings, West Kinfauns, Perth REPRESENTATIONS
Page 2
No embedded text on this page.
Page 3
Comments to the Development Quality Manager on a Planning Application Planning Application ref. 24/00327/IPL Comments provided by Danitza Molina Service/Section HE/Flooding Contact Details Description of Proposal Erection of a dwellinghouse (in principle) Address of site Land 25 Metres South Of 11 Kinfauns Holdings West Kinfauns, Perth, PH2 7JY Comments on the proposal We have reviewed the planning application (in principle) and have no objections. Some considerations have been detailed for the applicant's benefit. Flood Risk A review of the SEPA flood maps has determined that the site is at high risk from surface water flooding. Drainage The applicant states that SuDS (soakaway) will be provided but there is no detail in the application. In a full application, the applicant is required to provide details on the surface water drainage. The drainage requirements are outlined in policy 53 of the Local Development Plan 2019. Furthermore, the applicant is requested to demonstrate that the suggested method of SuDS meets the criteria outlined in the PKC LDP supplementary guidance (Flood risk and Flood Risk Assessments, 2021): 1. Percolation tests will be required, and the results forwarded to the Flooding Team for approval. 2. It will need to be demonstrated that hydrological and hydrogeological conditions are suitable and the time for emptying will not be excessive 3. SuDS should be designed to treat and attenuate surface water runoff for the 200-year (39% climate change) storm event. 4. Surface and foul drainage drawings and designs will be required Recommended planning condition(s) N/A Recommended informative(s) for applicant The applicant is advised to refer to Perth & Kinross Council’s Supplementary guidance on Flood Risk and Flood Risk Assessments 2021 as it contains advice relevant to your development. Date comments returned 18/03/2024
Page 4
No embedded text on this page.
Page 5
Dr Phyllis Windsor (Objects) Comment submitted date: Thu 11 Jul 2024 I object to the planning proposal on the same grounds as previously, (ref, 24/00327/IPL Land 25 Metres South Of 11 Kinfauns Holdings West Kinfauns Perth PH2 7JY). However, I would add one important correction to the submitted plans. The eastern boundary to the south of 11 Kinfauns Holdings is NOT the beech hedging referred to but is in fact the original wooden post and rail fence erected in 1994 when my property was built, and as clearly shown on my title deeds. The hedge was installed a foot to the west of the boundary line in the late 1990s from bare root hedging and is wholly within my property. As the mature hedge is 1.5m wide and extends a distance of 40 m, I strongly object to the applicant and their agents misappropriating up to 40 square metres of my land for the planned development. Two of the marked properties Benalder and Glenwood had planning consent prior to 1994 as I had the choice of all 4 plots in the development by GS Brown construction, before purchasing Plot 1. The other marked house to the rear of 13 Holdings was refused planning consent, overturned on appeal by the Scottish reporter. Furthermore, the submitted building line could be placed anywhere on the plan and is drawn as a straight line when the road is not straight, whilst ignoring the property line of 10, 10a, Fairways, and Frotroft. The fact that 11 has a north facing elevation is immaterial as the aforementioned properties are all south facing, As regards the pending application [24/00495/FL] for change of use of existing stable/equine facilities to shelter and/or storage of garden equipment; following failure to comply with enforcement for refused retrospective planning permission for the erected stables - I would confirm that the stables are still in use for horses as per available photographic evidence.
Page 6
No embedded text on this page.
Page 7
No embedded text on this page.
Page 8
No embedded text on this page.
Page 9
No embedded text on this page.
Page 10
No embedded text on this page.
Page 11
No embedded text on this page.
Page 12
No embedded text on this page.
Page 13
No embedded text on this page.
Page 14
No embedded text on this page.
Page 15
No embedded text on this page.
Page 16
No embedded text on this page.