Democracy Spraffa

(a) Notice of Review and supporting documents (Pages 455-562)

Perth and Kinross Council · 15 April 2024
Back to Local Review Body — 15 April 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

4(iv)(a) 
LRB-2024-07 
LRB-2024-07 - 23/01859/FLL - Erection of a dwellinghouse,
land 20 metres south west of Braeside House, Hatchbank
Road, Gairney Bank, Kinross, KY13 9JY 
PAPERS SUBMITTED
BY THE
APPLICANT

Page 2

No embedded text on this page.

Page 3

No embedded text on this page.

Page 4

No embedded text on this page.

Page 5

No embedded text on this page.

Page 6

No embedded text on this page.

Page 7

No embedded text on this page.

Page 8

No embedded text on this page.

Page 9

No embedded text on this page.

Page 10

REPORT OF HANDLING 
DELEGATED REPORT 
Ref No 23/01859/FLL
Ward No P8- Kinross-shire
Due Determination Date 8th January 2024 Extended to 31st January 2024
Draft Report Date 6th February 2024
Report Issued by cm Date 6/2/24  
PROPOSAL:   Erection of a dwellinghouse    
LOCATION:  Land 20 Metres South West Of Braeside House
Hatchbank Road Gairney Bank Kinross Ky13 9jy
Hatchbank Road Gairney Bank  
SUMMARY: 
This report recommends refusal of the application as the development is considered
to be contrary to the relevant provisions of the Development Plan and there are no
material considerations apparent which justify setting aside the Development Plan. 
BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 
The application is for a single storey dwellinghouse in the front garden of a 2-storey
dwellinghouse located on the north side of Hatchbank Road, Gairney Bank, Kinross.
The existing 5-bedroom 2-storey dwellinghouse is set back from the public road and
a building line formed by a linear residential development to the east of the site on
Hatchbank Road. 
A traditional cottage style design is proposed for the dwellinghouse to be located on
the west side of the front garden. Finishing materials include a stone basecourse,
white roughcast render walls and a slate roof. The existing vehicular access is to be
utilised and shared with the existing dwellinghouse and a parking area for 1no
vehicle is proposed north-west of the proposed dwellinghouse. A rear garden is
proposed (80sqm) and the front garden is to be shared and a new treatment plant,
serving the existing and proposed house, is to be located in the shared front garden.
5no Cypress Trees are to be removed on the west boundary of the site to enable the
development and replaced with 15no Cypress trees to be positioned in front of a 3m
high close boarded fence to provide noise mitigation from the M90. 
To the north and west of the application site are agricultural fields, further west is the
M90 and to the south is a public road and agricultural fields. To the east is a mix of
traditional and modern residential dwellinghouses forming a small settlement on the
north and south side of Hatchbank Road. 
SITE HISTORY 
17/01281/FLL Erection of ancillary accommodation 14 September 2017 Application
Approved

Page 11

19/01136/IPL Erection of a dwellinghouse and garage with ancillary accommodation
(in principle) 17 September 2019 Approved 
23/00593/FLL Erection of a dwellinghouse 25 July 2023 Application Refused 
23/00593/FLL Erection of a dwellinghouse 23 October 2023 Application Refused by
Local Review Body 
PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION 
None. 
DEVELOPMENT PLAN 
The Development Plan for the area comprises National Planning Framework 4
(NPF4) and the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) (LDP2). 
National Planning Framework 4 
The National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is the Scottish Government’s long-term
spatial strategy with a comprehensive set of national planning policies.  This strategy
sets out how to improve people’s lives by making sustainable, liveable and
productive spaces.   
NPF4 was adopted on 13 February 2023. NPF4 has an increased status over
previous NPFs and comprises part of the statutory development plan. 
The Council’s assessment of this application has considered the following policies of
NPF4: 
Policy 2: Climate Mitigation and Adaptation 
Policy 3: Biodiversity 
Policy 4: Natural Places 
Policy 6: Forestry, Woodland and Trees 
Policy 13: Sustainable Transport 
Policy 14: Design, Quality and Place 
Policy 16: Quality Homes 
Policy 17: Rural Homes 
Policy 20: Blue and Green Infrastructure 
Policy 22: Flood Risk and Water Management

Page 12

Policy 23: Health and Safety 
Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 – Adopted November 2019 
The Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) is the most recent statement of Council policy
and is augmented by Supplementary Guidance. 
The principal policies are: 
Policy 1A: Placemaking 
Policy 1B: Placemaking 
Policy 19: Housing in the Countryside 
Policy 32: Embedding Low & Zero Carbon Generating Technologies in New
Development 
Policy 40B: Forestry, Woodland and Trees: Trees, Woodland and Development 
Policy 41: Biodiversity 
Policy 42: Green Infrastructure 
Policy 46A: Loch Leven Catchment Area 
Policy 53B: Water Environment and Drainage: Foul Drainage 
Policy 53C: Water Environment and Drainage: Surface Water Drainage 
Policy 56: Noise Pollution 
Policy 60B: Transport Standards and Accessibility Requirements: New Development
Proposals 
Statutory Supplementary Guidance 
 Supplementary Guidance - Developer Contributions & Affordable Housing
(adopted in 2020)
 Supplementary Guidance - Flood Risk and Flood Risk Assessments
(adopted in 2021)
 Supplementary Guidance - Forest & Woodland Strategy (adopted in 2020)
 Supplementary Guidance - Green & Blue Infrastructure (adopted in 2020)
 Supplementary Guidance - Housing in the Countryside (adopted in 2020)
 Supplementary Guidance - Landscape (adopted in 2020)
 Supplementary Guidance - Placemaking (adopted in 2020)

Page 13

OTHER POLICIES 
Non-Statutory Guidance 
 Planning Guidance - Loch Leven SPA, the Dunkeld-Blairgowrie Lochs
SAC and the River Tay SAC
 Planning Guidance - Planning & Biodiversity
 Supplementary Guidance - Renewable & Low Carbon Energy (draft) 
NATIONAL GUIDANCE 
The Scottish Government expresses its planning policies through The National
Planning Framework, Planning Advice Notes, Creating Places, Designing Streets,
National Roads Development Guide and a series of Circulars.   
Planning Advice Notes 
The following Scottish Government Planning Advice Notes (PANs) and Guidance
Documents are of relevance to the proposal: 
 PAN 40 Development Management
 PAN 51 Planning, Environmental Protection and Regulation
 PAN 61 Planning and Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems
 PAN 68 Design Statements
 PAN 69 Planning and Building standards Advice on Flooding
 PAN 75 Planning for Transport
 PAN 77 Designing Safer Places 
Creating Places 2013 
Creating Places is the Scottish Government’s policy statement on architecture and
place. It sets out the comprehensive value good design can deliver. It notes that
successful places can unlock opportunities, build vibrant communities and contribute
to a flourishing economy and set out actions that can achieve positive changes in our
places. 
Designing Streets 2010 
Designing Streets is the policy statement in Scotland for street design and changes
the emphasis of guidance on street design towards place-making and away from a
system focused upon the dominance of motor vehicles. It was created to support the
Scottish Government’s place-making agenda, alongside Creating Places. 
National Roads Development Guide 2014 
This document supports Designing Streets and expands on its principles and is
considered to be the technical advice that should be followed in designing and
approving of all streets including parking provision.

Page 14

CONSULTATION RESPONSES 
External 
Scottish Water - No objection. 
Scottish Environment Protection Agency - No objection. 
NatureScot – no response. 
Internal 
Transportation And Development - No objection. 
Environmental Health (Noise Odour) - No objection, subject to condition. 
Biodiversity/Tree Officer – No response. Reference to comments received for
application 23/00593/FLL. 
Development Contributions Officer – 1 bedroom property therefore no contribution
required in line with Supplementary Guidance. 
REPRESENTATIONS 
No representations were received. 
Additional Statements Received:  
Screening Opinion  EIA Not Required
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA):
Environmental Report
Not applicable
Appropriate Assessment under Habitats
Regulations
Habitats Regulations/
AA Not Required
Design Statement or Design and Access
Statement
Submitted
Report on Impact or Potential Impact eg Flood
Risk Assessment
NIA and Tree Survey
submitted 
APPRAISAL 
Sections 25 and 37 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997
require that planning decisions be made in accordance with the development plan
unless material considerations indicate otherwise.  The Development Plan comprises
NPF4 and the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2019.  The relevant policy
considerations are outlined in the policy section above and are considered in more
detail below.  In terms of other material considerations, involving considerations of
the Council’s other approved policies and supplementary guidance, these are
discussed below only where relevant.

Page 15

The determining issues in this case are whether; the proposal complies with
development plan policy; or if there are any other material considerations which
justify a departure from policy. 
Policy Appraisal 
Design, Layout and Residential Amenity 
NPF4 Policy 14 Design, Quality and Place promotes well designed development. It
requires development proposals to be consistent with the six qualities of successful
places – Healthy, Pleasant, Connected, Distinctive, Sustainable and Adaptable. It
states that proposals which are poorly designed and detrimental to the amenity of
the surrounding will not be supported. Local placemaking policy, Policy 1, aligns with
national policy and requires the design, density and siting of development to respect
the character and amenity of the place. 
The new dwellinghouse is proposed approximately 7m from the front elevation of the
existing dwellinghouse and positioned to run parallel with the west boundary of the
front garden with the main elevation looking east onto the shared garden area. The
cottage style design has a stone basecourse built up in part to reflect the changing
ground levels and a flight of steps is shown to access the rear garden from the open
plan kitchen/living space. 
A long narrow area of private garden ground measuring 80sqm is proposed to the
rear (west). The proposed dwellinghouse is 3m from a row of Cypress trees (15) to
be planted along the west boundary of the site to replace the 5 Cypress trees to be
removed to enable the development. The trees will be positioned in front of a 3m
high close board fence to mitigate external noise from the M90 as identified in the
NIA (22-084 V2 dated 18 July 2023 undertaken by dB Acoustics & Environmental
Services). 
The Placemaking Supplementary Guidance (2020) states that private spaces should
be sized appropriate to the property they serve, proportionate to the size and layout
of the building. It states that appropriate screening with hedges, walls or fencing may
be necessary to ensure that the garden space is not overlooked from surrounding
houses or gardens. Private spaces must be designed so that residents have a
reasonable amount of sun/daylight. They should not be closely bounded by high
walls or buildings. 
The proposed dwellinghouse to be sited in front of a 2-storey dwellinghouse will be
significantly overlooked. The replacement boundary planting and 3m high close
board fence to the rear (west) will impact the amount of daylight/sunlight and amenity
of the new dwellinghouse. The proposal will have a detrimental impact on the
amenity of the existing dwellinghouse due to the proximity of the new dwellinghouse
and shared front garden and vehicular access.  The proposal is poorly designed and
sited and fails to respect existing and proposed residential amenity. 
An NIA was undertaken due to the proximity of the M90. The NIA highlights that in
order to comply with prescribed indoor noise levels, windows in the proposed
dwellinghouse would need to be closed and ventilation provided by passive trickle

Page 16

ventilators or mechanical whole house ventilation. The sound attenuation required
would be obtained by a combination of glazing, window vents and building façade
(Section 4.4 of NIA). This clearly shows the proposed development is poorly sited
and without mitigation would have a detrimental effect on residential amenity.   
The existing dwellinghouse, set back from the public road with a large front garden
and located at the end of a linear development of semi-detached cottages, is
distinctive in the local area. The proposed development is incongruous, poorly
designed and would have a negative impact on the character of the residential site
and surrounding area. 
The proposal does not satisfy NPF4 Policy 14 Design, Quality and Place and LDP2
Policy 1 Placemaking and associated Placemaking Supplementary Guidance (2020). 
Rural Homes 
The application site is not located in an identified settlement in LDP2. NPF4 Policy
17 Rural Homes is relevant to the proposal and this policy intends to encourage,
promote and facilitate the delivery of more high quality, affordable and sustainable
rural homes in the right locations. This policy states new homes should be suitably
scaled, sited and designed to be in keeping with the character of the area and should
meet specific criteria set out in Policy 17 a). 
The proposal does not meet any of the criteria set out in Policy 17 a). Further, as
outlined previously in the report, the proposal is not suitably sited and designed and
the proposed development will have a negative effect on the distinct character of the
existing dwellinghouse and the surrounding area. The proposal does not therefore
satisfy NPF4 Policy 17 a). 
LDP2 Policy 19 Housing in the Countryside and the related Supplementary
Guidance (2020) are relevant. This policy aims to safeguard the character of the
countryside; support the viability of communities; meet development needs in
appropriate locations; and ensure that high standards of siting and design are
achieved. 
The policy supports proposals which fall into one of the following categories: 
(1) Building Groups. 
(2) Infill sites. 
(3) New houses in the open countryside on defined categories of sites as set out
in section 3 of the Supplementary Guidance. 
(4) Renovation or replacement of houses. 
(5) Conversion or replacement of redundant non-domestic buildings. 
(6) Development on rural brownfield land.

Page 17

The Supporting Statement highlights Category 1 Building Groups as being relevant
to the proposed development. The Supplementary Guidance notes that permission
may be granted for houses which extend the group into a readily definable adjacent
site. This will be formed by existing topography, roads or well-established existing
landscape features such as a watercourse or mature tree belt which will provide a
suitable setting. 
The domestic garden ground to the front of a 5-bedroom house is not considered to
be a readily definable site to extend the building group as recognised in the
Supplementary Guidance. The proposal does not fit into LDP2 Policy 19 Categories
1-6. 
Section 3.1 of the Supplementary Guidance refers to ‘Existing Gardens’ and
proposals for a new house or houses within the original garden ground associated
with an existing country or estate house. This section does not apply to domestic
scale gardens. 
The proposed development is poorly designed and sited and will have a negative
effect on the character of the residential plot and surrounding area. The proposal
does not satisfy LDP2 Policy 19: Housing in the Countryside and related
Supplementary Guidance (2020). 
Roads and Access 
Transportation and Development have no objections to this proposal in respect of
roads and parking. 
Drainage and Phosphorous Mitigation 
The proposed site plan shows a treatment plant will serve the existing and proposed
house and will connect into an existing drainage line and soakaway for the existing
house and replace a septic tank. Surface water will also connect into the existing
drainage line and soakaway. 
The proposal satisfies NPF4 Policy 22: Flood Risk and Water Management and
LDP2 Policy 53B: Water Environment and Drainage: Foul Drainage and Policy 53C:
Water Environment and Drainage: Surface Water Drainage. 
SEPA was consulted and confirm that there is sufficient phosphorous mitigation
proposed. Conditions are recommended by SEPA should the application be
approved. 
The proposal satisfies NPF4 Policy 22: Flood Risk and Water Management and LDP
2 Policy 46A: Loch Leven Catchment Area.

Page 18

Natural Heritage and Biodiversity 
Trees 
A Tree Survey Report has been submitted (Docement 08). It surveyed 16 individual
trees and two unique tree groups. It identified that a primary constraint to the
development is tree group 1, a linear shelterbelt of cypress on the west boundary in
good condition. Also, tree group 2, a broadleaf plantation on a north facing
embankment, in fair condition which would have over ground constraints associated
with group canopy. The report is a survey of existing trees only and does not include
details of compensatory planting or tree protection methods. 
The removal of a tree group to enable the development is not supported as this
offers an attractive mature green buffer and screening from the M90. The proposal
will lead to the fragmentation of an existing green network.  
Biodiversity  
A number of biodiversity enhancements are proposed and shown on the site plan.
These are proposed without the benefit of an ecologist report outlining a survey of
the site, its characteristics and professional ecologist recommendations. As stated in
NPF4 Policy 3 Biodiversity, careful planning and design should minimise potential
adverse impacts on nature networks and the natural environment (Policy 3d).  
The proposed development does not respect the setting of the site and its
characteristics. The proposal does not satisfy NPF4 Policy 6 Forestry, Woodland and
Trees, NPF4 Policy 3 Biodiversity and NPF4 Policy 20 Blue and Green Infrastructure
and LDP2 Policy 40B Trees, Woodland and Development, Policy 41 Biodiversity and
Policy 42: Green Infrastructure.  
Noise 
EH are satisfied that the submitted NIA demonstrates that internal and external noise
criteria levels at the proposed dwellinghouse can be achieved through the
recommended mitigation measures to ensure a satisfactory level of residential
amenity at the property. Should planning permission be granted, a condition is
recommended to ensure all recommendations and mitigation measures in the NIA
are implemented accordingly.  
The proposal satisfies NPF4 Policy 23 Health and Safety and LDP2 Policy 56 Noise
Pollution, subject to condition.  
Material Considerations  
Site History  
The Applicant’s Supporting Statement notes planning permissions 17/01281/FLL for
an annex and 19/01136/IPL for a dwellinghouse. The applications were approved
under Local Development Plan (2014), now superseded.

Page 19

The application has been assessed under NPF4 and local planning policy LDP2
which seek to facilitate the delivery of high quality and sustainable rural homes in the
right locations. The assessment above demonstrates that the proposal is not
supported by national and local planning policy. 
Supporting Statement  
The statement refers to the proposed resident of the new dwellinghouse being
registered disabled and unable to enjoy the existing dwellinghouse and the proposal
makes appropriate provision for inclusive design. It states that it is hoped that the
existing house can be retained and occupied by immediate family. 
No supporting information has been submitted to show that the dwellinghouse is for
a registered disabled person. The proposed floor plan does not make reference to
accessibility/inclusive design and the access from the main living space to the rear
garden is by a flight of steps. Section 3.4 of the Supplementary Guidance refers to
Houses for Local People where the needs of someone within the household has
changed and they now require a different type of accommodation, for example, a
house which is suitable for a wheelchair user. In all cases the applicant will be
required to demonstrate that no alternative accommodation is available to them
within the local area. No information has been submitted for the proposal to be
considered against this category.  
The supporting statement highlights large ancillary buildings in the local area which it
states the proposed dwellinghouse is relatable to. However, these are located mainly
to the side and rear of a dwellinghouse and not to the front which would generally not
align with good design practice and placemaking policy. 
There are no material considerations to justify approval of the application.  
Developer Contributions  
The Developer Contributions Guidance is not applicable to this application and
therefore no contributions are required in this instance.  
Economic Impact  
The economic impact of the proposal is likely to be minimal and limited to the
construction phase of the development.  
VARIATION OF APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 32A 
This application was not varied prior to determination, in accordance with the terms
of section 32A of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as amended.    
PLANNING OBLIGATIONS AND LEGAL AGREEMENTS  
None required.

Page 20

DIRECTION BY SCOTTISH MINISTERS  
None applicable to this proposal.  
CONCLUSION AND REASONS FOR DECISION  
To conclude, the application must be determined in accordance with the
Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.  In this respect,
the proposal is considered to be contrary to the Development Plan.  Account has
been taken of the relevant material considerations and none has been found that
would justify overriding the Development Plan.  
Accordingly, the proposal is refused on the grounds identified below.  
Conditions and Reasons 
1. The proposed development is poorly designed, fails to respect the building
pattern and character of the area and will have a significant detrimental
impact on residential amenity. The proposal does not satisfy the requirements
of NPF4 Policy 14: Design, Quality and Place and NPF4 Policy 17: Rural
Homes and LDP2 Policy 1: Placemaking and related Placemaking
Supplementary Guidance (2020) and LDP2 Policy 19: Housing in the
Countryside and the related Housing in the Countryside Supplementary
Guidance (2020) of the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019). 
2. The proposed development does not respect the setting of the site and its
characteristics. The removal of a mature tree group and an attractive green
buffer to enable the development will lead to the fragmentation of an existing
green network. The proposal does not satisfy NPF4 Policy 6: Forestry,
Woodland and Trees and NPF4 Policy 20: Blue and Green Infrastructure and
LDP2 Policy 1: Placemaking, Policy 40B: Trees, Woodland and Development
and Policy 42: Green Infrastructure. 
Justification 
The proposal is not in accordance with the Development Plan and there are no
material reasons which justify departing from the Development Plan. 
Informatives 
None 
Procedural Notes 
Not Applicable.

Page 21

PLANS AND DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THIS DECISION 
01 
02 
03 
04 
06 
07 
08 
09 
10 
11 
12

Page 22

No embedded text on this page.

Page 23

No embedded text on this page.

Page 24

No embedded text on this page.

Page 25

No embedded text on this page.

Page 26

No embedded text on this page.

Page 27

No embedded text on this page.

Page 28

No embedded text on this page.

Page 29

No embedded text on this page.

Page 30

No embedded text on this page.

Page 31

No embedded text on this page.

Page 32

No embedded text on this page.

Page 33

No embedded text on this page.

Page 34

No embedded text on this page.

Page 35

No embedded text on this page.

Page 36

No embedded text on this page.

Page 37

No embedded text on this page.

Page 38

No embedded text on this page.

Page 39

No embedded text on this page.

Page 40

No embedded text on this page.

Page 41

No embedded text on this page.

Page 42

No embedded text on this page.

Page 43

No embedded text on this page.

Page 44

No embedded text on this page.

Page 45

No embedded text on this page.

Page 46

No embedded text on this page.

Page 47

No embedded text on this page.

Page 48

No embedded text on this page.

Page 49

No embedded text on this page.

Page 50

No embedded text on this page.

Page 51

No embedded text on this page.

Page 52

No embedded text on this page.

Page 53

No embedded text on this page.

Page 54

No embedded text on this page.

Page 55

No embedded text on this page.

Page 56

No embedded text on this page.

Page 57

No embedded text on this page.

Page 58

No embedded text on this page.

Page 59

No embedded text on this page.

Page 60

No embedded text on this page.

Page 61

No embedded text on this page.

Page 62

No embedded text on this page.

Page 63

No embedded text on this page.

Page 64

No embedded text on this page.

Page 65

No embedded text on this page.

Page 66

No embedded text on this page.

Page 67

No embedded text on this page.

Page 68

No embedded text on this page.

Page 69

No embedded text on this page.

Page 70

No embedded text on this page.

Page 71

No embedded text on this page.

Page 72

No embedded text on this page.

Page 73

No embedded text on this page.

Page 74

No embedded text on this page.

Page 75

No embedded text on this page.

Page 76

No embedded text on this page.

Page 77

No embedded text on this page.

Page 78

No embedded text on this page.

Page 79

No embedded text on this page.

Page 80

No embedded text on this page.

Page 81

No embedded text on this page.

Page 82

No embedded text on this page.

Page 83

No embedded text on this page.

Page 84

No embedded text on this page.

Page 85

No embedded text on this page.

Page 86

No embedded text on this page.

Page 87

No embedded text on this page.

Page 88

No embedded text on this page.

Page 89

No embedded text on this page.

Page 90

No embedded text on this page.

Page 91

No embedded text on this page.

Page 92

No embedded text on this page.

Page 93

No embedded text on this page.

Page 94

No embedded text on this page.

Page 95

No embedded text on this page.

Page 96

No embedded text on this page.

Page 97

No embedded text on this page.

Page 98

No embedded text on this page.

Page 99

No embedded text on this page.

Page 100

No embedded text on this page.

Page 101

No embedded text on this page.

Page 102

No embedded text on this page.

Page 103

No embedded text on this page.

Page 104

No embedded text on this page.

Page 105

No embedded text on this page.

Page 106

No embedded text on this page.

Page 107

No embedded text on this page.

Page 108

No embedded text on this page.