(b) Planning Decision Notice, Report of Handling and Reference Documents (Pages 27-60)
Perth and Kinross Council · 27 January 2025
Back to Local Review Body — 27 January 2025 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.
Page 1
4(i)(b) LRB-2024-49 LRB-2024-49 24/00957/IPL - Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle), land 40 metres south west of Witchill, Kinnoull Terrace, Perth PLANNING DECISION NOTICE REPORT OF HANDLING REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Page 2
No embedded text on this page.
Page 3
No embedded text on this page.
Page 4
No embedded text on this page.
Page 5
No embedded text on this page.
Page 6
REPORT OF HANDLING DELEGATED REPORT Ref No 24/00957/IPL Ward No P12- Perth City Centre Due Determination Date 8th September 2024 Draft Report Date 2nd September 2024 Report Issued by Persephone Beer Date 4th September 2024 PROPOSAL: Erection of dwellinghouse (in principle) LOCATION: Land 40 Metres South West Of Witchill Kinnoull Terrace Perth SUMMARY: This report recommends refusal of the application as the development is considered to be contrary to the relevant provisions of the Development Plan and there are no material considerations apparent which justify setting aside the Development Plan. BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Planning permission in principle is sought for a site 40m to the southwest of Witchhill House which is a category B listed villa in the Kinnoull Conservation Area. The proposed development site measures around 620 square metres and historically formed an area of garden ground to Witchhill. The site is prominently located on a rocky outcrop to the west side of Dundee Road adjacent to the category C listed Kinnoull Primary School. Indicative proposed site plans and elevations have been submitted showing a two storey property. Vehicular access would be taken along Kinnoull Terrace which is a private road, to the public road at Bowerswell Road. Indicative parking provision for 3 cars is shown. The site has an extensive planning history with six planning applications from the same applicant having been refused on the site between 1996 and 2016. SITE HISTORY 07/01882/FUL Extension to dwellinghouse 4 October 2007 Application Approved 07/01894/LBC Extension to dwellinghouse 4 October 2007 Application Approved 20/00761/TW Evergreen fir/pine tree - Fell tree 22 June 2020 Application Approved 21/00538/TW Pruning back leylandi hedge, taking top branches off trees 12 April 2021 Application Approved 00/01466/OUT Erection of 4 flats and associated car parking (in outline) at 21 December 2000
Page 7
96/00695/FUL Erection of 4 flatted dwellings (in outline) at 19 July 1996 Application Refused 07/01745/OUT Residential flatted development (in outline) 17 October 2007 Application Refused 08/00248/OUT Proposed residential development (4-6 units) (in outline) 9 July 2008 Application Refused 13/00698/IPL Formation of flatted residential development (in principle) 24 July 2013 Application Refused 16/00738/FLL Erection of a dwellinghouse 9 May 2016 16/00863/IPL Erection of a dwellinghouse (in principle) 11 August 2016 Application Refused 24/00601/FLL Erection of dwellinghouse 19 June 2024 Applicatinon returned PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION Pre application Reference: 21/00645/PREAPP DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Development Plan for the area comprises National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) (LDP2). National Planning Framework 4 The National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is the Scottish Government’s long-term spatial strategy with a comprehensive set of national planning policies. This strategy sets out how to improve people’s lives by making sustainable, liveable and productive spaces. NPF4 was adopted on 13 February 2023. NPF4 has an increased status over previous NPFs and comprises part of the statutory development plan. The Council’s assessment of this application has considered the following policies of NPF4 : Policy 1: Tackling the Climate and Nature Crises Policy 2: Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Policy 7: Historic Assets and Places Policy 13: Sustainable Transport Policy 14: Design, Quality and Place Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 – Adopted November 2019 The Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) is the most recent statement of Council policy and is augmented by Supplementary Guidance.
Page 8
The principal policies are: Policy 1A: Placemaking Policy 1B: Placemaking Policy 5: Infrastructure Contributions Policy 17: Residential Areas Policy 27A: Listed Buildings Policy 28A: Conservation Areas: New Development Policy 32: Embedding Low & Zero Carbon Generating Technologies in New Development Policy 39: Landscape Policy 40B: Forestry, Woodland and Trees: Trees, Woodland and Development Policy 41: Biodiversity Policy 53B: Water Environment and Drainage: Foul Drainage Policy 53C: Water Environment and Drainage: Surface Water Drainage Policy 53E: Water Environment and Drainage: Water Supply Policy 57: Air Quality Policy 60B: Transport Standards and Accessibility Requirements: New Development Proposals Statutory Supplementary Guidance Supplementary Guidance - Air Quality (adopted in 2020) Supplementary Guidance - Developer Contributions & Affordable Housing (adopted in 2020) Supplementary Guidance - Flood Risk and Flood Risk Assessments (adopted in 2021) Supplementary Guidance - Placemaking (adopted in 2020) OTHER POLICIES Non Statutory Guidance Planning Guidance - Planning & Biodiversity Conservation areas NATIONAL GUIDANCE The Scottish Government expresses its planning policies through The National Planning Framework, Planning Advice Notes, Creating Places, Designing Streets, National Roads Development Guide and a series of Circulars. Planning Advice Notes The following Scottish Government Planning Advice Notes (PANs) and Guidance Documents are of relevance to the proposal: PAN 40 Development Management PAN 51 Planning, Environmental Protection and Regulation PAN 61 Planning and Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems PAN 68 Design Statements
Page 9
PAN 69 Planning and Building standards Advice on Flooding PAN 75 Planning for Transport PAN 77 Designing Safer Places Creating Places 2013 Creating Places is the Scottish Government’s policy statement on architecture and place. It sets out the comprehensive value good design can deliver. It notes that successful places can unlock opportunities, build vibrant communities and contribute to a flourishing economy and set out actions that can achieve positive changes in our places. Designing Streets 2010 Designing Streets is the policy statement in Scotland for street design and changes the emphasis of guidance on street design towards place-making and away from a system focused upon the dominance of motor vehicles. It was created to support the Scottish Government’s place-making agenda, alongside Creating Places. National Roads Development Guide 2014 This document supports Designing Streets and expands on its principles and is considered to be the technical advice that should be followed in designing and approving of all streets including parking provision. CONSULTATION RESPONSES Environmental Health (Contaminated Land) A search of the historic records did not raise any concerns regarding ground contamination. No adverse comments to make on the application. Scottish Water No objection. Capacity for water supply. Submit a Waste Water Application to Scottish Water with regard to waste water treatment. Transportation And Development Not in a position to support this application, as there has been no material change to the layout of the access from Kinnoull Terrace onto Bowerswell Road to improve the sub-standard access, which would constitute an increased risk to pedestrian and traffic safety. Conservation Object to the proposal as the development has the potential to detract from the residential and visual amenity of the conservation area due to the site’s existing character, its elevated location and its proximity to a number of prominent listed buildings. The current proposal encroaches on the setting of Witchhill and appears fundamentally at odds with the historic pattern of development. Development Contributions Officer Conditions required with regard to developer contributions for primary education provision and transport infrastructure.
Page 10
REPRESENTATIONS Fourteen representations were received. These include one general comment and two supporting letters of representation. Eleven of the representations submitted object to the proposals on the following grounds: Visual amenity Contrary to development plan Access and road safety – inadequate visibility, no suitable access. Kinnoull Terrace is an unadopted road owned and controlled by residents, no turning area for refuse or delivery vehicles Lack of parking Impact on character of the Conservation area – visible from A85 and Tay Street, to front of building line Impact on trees Impact on the setting of a listed building – in curtilage of a listed building Drainage issues - not possible to provide appropriate foul and surface water disposal History of refusals Proximity to school, overlooking – safeguarding issues Lack of potential garden ground Precedent for other similar proposals. Impact on protected species (bats), no biodiversity mitigation provided Lack of information - no ecological assessment, no tree survey, no heritage assessment, no design statement, no detailed site investigations, no information to allow assessment within a conservation area, no detailed policy assessment. Contaminated land – former quarry, no technical information to assess if the ground conditions are suitable for development. No consideration of disabled access The above matters will be addressed in the appraisal section of the report. Land ownership, as noted in terms of the access road, is not in itself a material planning consideration. Additional Statements Received: Screening Opinion EIA Not Required Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Environmental Report Not applicable Appropriate Assessment under Habitats Regulations Habitats Regulations AA Not Required Design Statement or Design and Access Statement Submitted/Not Required Report on Impact or Potential Impact eg Flood Risk Assessment Submitted/Not Required
Page 11
APPRAISAL Sections 25 and 37 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 require that planning decisions be made in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The Development Plan comprises NPF4 and the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2019. The relevant policy considerations are outlined in the policy section above and are considered in more detail below. In terms of other material considerations, involving considerations of the Council’s other approved policies and supplementary guidance, these are discussed below only where relevant. In this instance, section 14(2) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997 places a duty on planning authorities in determining such an application as this to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses. Section 64(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997 is relevant and requires planning authorities to pay special attention to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the designated conservation area. The determining issues in this case are whether; the proposal complies with development plan policy; or if there are any other material considerations which justify a departure from policy. Policy Appraisal The application seeks to establish the principle of erecting a dwellinghouse on land within the Perth settlement boundary where Policy 17 of the adopted Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2019 applies. This recognises that residential development within existing settlements can often make a useful contribution to the supply of housing land but acknowledges the potential conflicts new development can have with the existing built environment. Proposals will be encouraged where they satisfy the criteria set out in the policy in particular criteria a) Infill residential development at a density which represents the most efficient use of the site while respecting its environs and c) proposals which will improve the character and environment of the area. Policies 1A and B, Placemaking, are also of relevance. These policies require proposals to contribute positively to the surrounding built and natural environment and to respect the character and amenity of the place. They also state that development should have a design, density and siting which respects established character. In addition, policy 2, Design Statements states that design statements will normally need to accompany a planning application if the development: (c) affects the character and/or appearance of a Conservation Area, Historic Garden, Designed Landscape, or the setting of a Listed Building or Scheduled Monument. Policy 27A Listed Buildings states that there will be a presumption in favour of the retention of listed buildings, and the protection of their settings. Policy 28A
Page 12
Conservation Areas states that the Council will encourage proposals which preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area. Policy 40B, Trees Woodland and Development requires tree surveys should accompany all applications for planning permission where there are trees on site. Policy 41 Biodiversity requires the Council will seek to protect and enhance wildlife and wildlife habitats, whether formally designated/protected or not. Policies in National Planning Framework 4 (NPP4) are also relevant to this proposal. In particular policy 6, Forestry, Woodland and Trees and Policy 7, Historic Assets both seek to safeguard natural and built assets. Policy 14 Design outlines 6 qualities for successful spaces and Policy 16 Quality Homes supports sustainable development in the right locations. Design and Layout Placemaking and design policies of NPF4 and the LDP requires development to contribute positively to the quality of the surrounding built and natural environment and for the design, density and siting of development to respect the character and amenity of the place. The indicative proposal for a two-storey building sited in front of the rear building line of Kinnoull Terrace is unlikely to respect the character of the place or contribute positively to the surrounding built and natural environment. As such it would be contrary to policy 1A and 1B b) and d) Placemaking of the Local Development Plan and to NPF4 policy 14: Design, Quality and Place. Landscape and Trees A statement has been submitted with regard to the existing trees on the site. Policy 40, Forestry and Woodland Strategy of the Local Development Plan e) seeks to ensure that trees in Conservation Areas and trees on development sites are safeguarded in accordance with BS5837: Trees in Relation to Construction. The information submitted with the application is not fit for purpose and does comply with the requirements of BS5857 or with policy 40B, Trees, Woodland and Development, of the Local Development Plan. This states that tree surveys, undertaken by a suitably qualified progressional, should accompany all applications for planning permission where there are existing trees on the site. Information is required to assess the condition, amenity value and nature conservation value of existing trees. The applicant suggests that the height of the existing trees will be reduced but no indication is given as to how this will impact the health of the trees and whether it is feasible to carry out development close to them without undermining their health. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy 40Ae) and 40B of the LDP and policy 6, Forestry, woodland and trees of NPF4. Residential Amenity The application is in principle. There has been a public comment suggesting that development on the site may impact on the amenity of the adjacent primary school. However the impact on amenity such as loss of privacy, overlooking, overshadowing and provision of private amenity space would be fully assessed should a detailed proposal be submitted.
Page 13
Visual Amenity The application is in principle with limited detail provided. As such is it not possible to fully evaluate the potential visual impact of this proposal. However, as with previous applications indicative sketches, which are of poor quality, have been submitted to accompany the application. These again highlight that significant adverse visual impact would be likely to be experienced by such development on this site due to the elevated nature of the site in a prominent location, in front of the rear building line of Kinnoull Terrace and within the Conservation Area. There was previously concern expressed that any scale of building (even single storey) would have a detrimental visual impact on the character of this sensitive area, particularly if some of the large trees are removed as part of any detailed submission to facilitate development. Based on the quality and detail of what has been submitted it is considered that the proposal will have a significant adverse visual impact on the area. Roads and Access Vehicle access to the site is proposed via Kinnoull Terrace which is a private road. Vehicles would join the public road at Bowerswell Road. Objectors note that there are no suitable turning facilities for large vehicles such refuse lorries of for delivery vehicles. Transportation and Development note that the width of Kinnoull Terrace at the end is around 7 metres, which makes turning, especially for larger vehicles very difficult, thus compromising on pedestrian and vehicle safety. Previous applications 13/00698/IPL and 16/00863/IPL, both identified that there is restricted visibility splays from Kinnoull Terrace onto Bowerswell Road, due to the existing stone walls. The visibility available, using a standard setback distance of 2.4m, is approximately 16m in the easterly direction (up Bowerswell Road) and approximately 28m in the westerly direction (down Bowerswell Road). These distances do not meet the standards of the National Road Development Guide. Since the previous refusals in 2013 and 2016 there has been no material change to the alignment of the access from Kinnoull Terrace onto Bowerswell Road. The restricted geometry and lack of visibility caused by the existing stone walls has not changed. Comments made by Transportation and Development officers previously, have not been addressed by the applicant, to allow the previous position to be changed. As a result, the previous objections remain valid. The previous application showed a pedestrian route to Dundee Road, this application does not, thus increasing the pedestrian movements along Kinnoull Terrace. The drawings provided by the applicant also do not clearly identify the location of parking spaces on site, as a result, a clear indication of where the bays are to be located will be required. Notwithstanding that, the application has not demonstrated that there will be suitable turning facilities within the site through the provision of a swept path analysis. The application cannot be supported due to the sub-standard access from Kinnoull Terrace onto Bowerswell Road. This is contrary to policy 60B of the LDP and approval of the application would constitute an increased risk to pedestrian and traffic safety. It would also be contrary to NPF4 Policy 13b) Sustainable Places as
Page 14
the transport requirements and impact of the proposed development have not been fully considered. Drainage and Flooding The principle of development on the site is not supported. However, if approved any full application will require full details of surface water drainage arrangements to comply with policy 53C, Surface Water Drainage, of the Local Development Plan 2019 and would require a method of SuDS that meets criteria outlined in the PKC LDP supplementary guidance (Flood risk and Flood Risk Assessments, 2021). Policy 53B, Foul Drainage, of the Local Development Plan generally requires development within settlements to connect to existing public sewerage system. Full details of proposed foul drainage arrangements would be required should the principle of development be established. Conservation Considerations Witchhill House is a category B listed villa in the Kinnoull Conservation Area, part of the Victorian expansion of Perth to the west, characterised by large villas in substantial garden grounds. The proposed development site historically formed an area of garden ground to Witchhill, prominently located on a rocky outcrop to the west side of Dundee Road. The unusual streetscape here contributes to the setting of the adjacent listed buildings including Kinnoull Primary School and Parish Church, as well as to the character and appearance of the conservation area. The garden of Witchhill is noted in the Kinnoull Conservation Area Appraisal (2010) as being bounded by a mature tree belt which contributes positively to the character of the area (Map 10 p.14). Development here has the potential to detract from the residential and visual amenity of the conservation area due to the site’s existing character, its elevated location and its proximity to a number of prominent listed buildings. As set out in LDP2 Policy 27A, the layout, design, materials, scale, siting and use of any development which will affect a listed building or its setting should be appropriate to the building’s character, appearance and setting. The current proposal encroaches on the setting of Witchhill and appears fundamentally at odds with the historic pattern of development. While indicative elevations have been included in this application, it is noted that this is an application in principle, and it is therefore not possible to fully assess the impact of the development. The accompanying design statement does not adequately explain and illustrate the design principles and how the proposal has been developed as the best response to the context, as set out in PAN 68: Design Statements. Development in a conservation area is subject to the submission of a detailed application (as specified in LDP2 Policy 28A), and an appropriate design statement (as required by LDP2 Policy 2).
Page 15
The proposed development is contrary to NPF4 Policy 6 – Historic Assets and Places and LDP2 Policy 2: Design Statements, Policy 28A: Conservation Areas; Policy 28A: New Development. Natural Heritage and Biodiversity There are mature trees and other vegetation on the site. No information has been submitted to assess the impact on biodiversity and protected species from the proposed development. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy 41 Biodiversity of the LDP and policy 3, Biodiversity, of NPF4 which both require proposals to be based on an understanding of the biodiversity of value of a site and the potential to impact on protected species and habitats. Provision should also be made to enhance biodiversity as part of any development. Developer Contributions Primary Education The Council Developer Contributions Supplementary Guidance requires a financial contribution towards increased primary school capacity in areas where a primary school capacity constraint has been identified. A capacity constraint is defined as where a primary school is operating at over 80% and is likely to be operating following completion of the proposed development, extant planning permissions and Local Development Plan allocations, at or above 100% of total capacity. This proposal is within the catchment of Kinnoull Primary School. Transport Infrastructure The Council Transport Infrastructure Developer Contributions Supplementary Guidance requires a financial contribution towards the cost of delivering the transport infrastructure improvements which are required for the release of all development sites in and around Perth. The application falls within the identified Transport Infrastructure Supplementary Guidance boundary and a condition to reflect this should be attached to any planning application granted. Conditions to ensure compliance with policy 5, Infrastructure Contributions, of LDP2 would be added should the application be approved. Contaminated Land There is a former quarry adjacent to the site. A search of the historical records has shown that the quarry adjacent to this site has previously been investigated by Perth & Kinross Council. The investigation identified the quarry as low risk in terms of contamination and Contaminated Land has concluded that the site did not raise any concerns regarding ground contamination. Waste and recycling This property would be on a four-bin system. Bins should be presented at the road end on Bowerswell Road.
Page 16
Economic Impact The economic impact of the proposal is likely to be minimal and limited to the construction phase of the development. VARIATION OF APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 32A This application was not varied prior to determination. PLANNING OBLIGATIONS AND LEGAL AGREEMENTS None required. DIRECTION BY SCOTTISH MINISTERS None applicable to this proposal. CONCLUSION AND REASONS FOR DECISION To conclude, the application must be determined in accordance with the Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this respect, the proposal is considered to be contrary to the Development Plan. Account has been taken of the relevant material considerations and none has been found that would justify overriding the Development Plan. Accordingly the proposal is refused on the grounds identified below. Conditions and Reasons 1 Due to the elevated position and prominent location development of the site would adversely affect the density, character and visual amenity of the existing area and would not contribute positively to the surrounding built and natural environment. As such it would be contrary to Policy 1A and 1B b) and d) Placemaking and Policy 17, Residential Areas of the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and to Policy 14, Design, Quality and Place, of National Planning Framework 4 (2023) which seek to ensure development is compatible with the amenity and character of the area, considers and respects site topography and important views together with respecting an existing building line. 2 The proposed development does not respect the historic pattern or density of development in relation to adjacent residential properties and would result in development that would detract from the residential and visual amenity of the character and appearance of the Kinnoull Conservation Area. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy 27A, Conservation Areas, of the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and Policy 7, Historic Assets and Places, of National Planning Framework 4 (2023) which both seek to ensure that the architectural and historic character of Conservation Areas is preserved or enhanced, including protecting existing cultural heritage from inappropriate development.
Page 17
3 Policy 28A, Conservation Areas, of the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) requires that development in a conservation area is subject to submission of a detailed application and an appropriate design statement. The indicative plans are of poor quality and the design statement is inadequate as it does not explain and illustrate the design principles or how the proposal has been developed as the best response to the context. The proposal is therefore contrary to PAN 68: Design Statements, Policy 28A, Conservation Areas, and Policy 2, Design Statements, of the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019). 4 The proposed development encroaches on the setting of Category B listed Witchhill and will have a detrimental impact on its setting and on other neighbouring listed buildings. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy 28A of the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019), Historic Assets and Places and Policy 7, Historic assets and places, of National Planning Framework 4 (2023) which seeks to ensure that the setting of listed buildings are safeguarded, and that cultural heritage is protected from inappropriate development. 5 No information has been submitted to assess the impact on biodiversity and protected species from the proposed development and no information has been provided as to how the proposal will enhance biodiversity. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy 41, Biodiversity, of the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and Policy 3, Biodiversity, of National Planning Framework 4 (2023) which both require proposals to demonstrate that they will protect and enhance biodiversity. 6 Insufficient information has been submitted to assess the impact of the proposal on existing trees and as such it is contrary to Policy 40Ae) and 40B, Trees, Woodland and Development, of the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and Policy 6, Forestry, woodland and trees of National Planning Framework 4 (2023). 7 Approval of the application would constitute an increased risk to pedestrian and traffic safety due to the sub-standard access from Kinnoull Terrace onto Bowerswell Road. The proposals are therefore contrary to Policy 60B of the Perth and Kinross Local Development Plan 2 (2019) and to Policy 13b) Sustainable transport of National Planning Framework 4 (2023).as the transport requirements and impact of the proposed development have not been fully considered and addressed. Justification The proposal is not in accordance with the Development Plan and there are no material reasons which justify departing from the Development Plan. Informatives None.
Page 18
Procedural Notes Not Applicable. PLANS AND DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THIS DECISION 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Page 19
No embedded text on this page.
Page 20
T, .
2e
7<
('1
HU3
ER 5. Descri tion of the Pro - osal
h Please describe the proposal including any change of use:
0N u A
E A $l QLE guiw/ué 0F rum Sra/éeyj
5 Fawmmr 0mm, (20 m 7 ,20740: 4.6T .Wy
g M91 a bed ELL/NG
L/r\-I\/0 New UNUK E")
Is this a temporary permission? Yes DNOZ
if yes, please state how long permission is required for and why:
(u DEP(U 1' i ErY
Have the works already been started or completed? YesDNo n
if yes, please state date of completion, or if not completed, the start date:
Datestaned: E:I oatecompietedz ::i
If yes, piease explain why work has already taken place in advance of making this application
6. Pre-Ao -iication Discussion
Have you received ahy advice from the planning authority in relation to this proposal? YesDNoZ
If yes. please provide details about the advice below:
In what format was the advice given? Meeting I] Telephone call I] Letter El Email D '
Have you agreed or are you discussing 3 Processing Agreement with the planning authority? YesDNo D
Please provide a description of the advice you were given and who you received the advice from:
Name: [:::J9361:: Re: No: i::]
7. Site Area
Piease state the site area in either hectares or square metres:
Hectares (ha): Square Metre (sq.m.) bl0/ i _ _ '7 i
8. Existin- Use No «r '
2 vPage 21
'U
2:
7<
('1
HU3
EE Please describe the current or most recent use:
b e.._- __ H- ____A-t
§ 114:4; 14 No (ms: TKE LAND t5 duERGEwAIJ a
F
AN 7 _ _ 7, _
m .
9. Access and Parkin
. Are you proposing a new altered vehicle access to or from a public road? YesDNom
Ifyes, please show in your drawings the position of any existing, altered or new access and explain the changes
youpropose to make. You shouldalso show existing footpaths andnote ifthere will be any impact on these.
Are you proposing any changes to pUbIIC paths, public rights of way or YesDNoIZ
affecting any public rights of access?
Ifyes, please show on your drawings the position of any affected areas and explain the changes you propose to
make, including arrangements for continuing or alternative public access.
How many vehicle parking spaces (garaging and open parking) currently /
exist on the application site?
How many vehicle parking spaces (garaging and open parking) do you
propose on the site? (Le. the total number of existing spaces plus any
new spaces)
Please show on your drawings the position ofexisting and proposedparking spaces and specify ifthese are to be
allocated forparticular types of vehicles (e.g, parking for disabledpeople, coaches, HGV vehicles, etc.)
10. Water Su - -I and Draina -e Arran -ements
Will your proposals require new or altered water supply Yes NOD
or drainage arrangements?
Are you proposing to connect to the public drainage network (e.g. to an existing sewer?)
Yes, connecting to a public drainage network
No, proposing to make private drainage arrangements U
Not applicable -only arrangement for water supply required El
. . MWWhat private arrangements are you proposmg for the new/altered septic tank?
Discharge to land via soakaway
Discharge to watercourse(s) (including partial soakaway) D
Discharge to coastal waters D
Please show more details on yourplans and supporting information '
What private arrangements are you proposing?
Treatment/Additional treatment (relates to package sewer treatment plants. or passive ' E] M
sewage treatment such as a reed bed) _
Other private drainage arrangement (such as a chemical toilets or composting toilets) D M
Please show more details on yourplans and supporting infonnation.
Do your proposals make provision for sustainable drainage of surface water? Yes Z] No D
. 5 , ~
I x ,4
3Page 22
. -
'U .
2e
7<
('1
HU3
S; Note:- Please include details ofSUDS arrangements on yourplans
\N
E Are you proposing to connect to the public water supply network? Yes No D
._.
E If no, using a private water supply, please show on plans the supply and all works needed to provide it (on or off
N site)L;
V
11. Assessment of Flood Risk ,
Is the site within an area of known risk of flooding? Yes DNO Z
Ifthe site is within an area ofknown risk of ooding you may need to submit a Flood Risk Assessment before your
application can be determined. You may wish to contact your planning authority or SEPA for advice on what
information may be required.
Do you think your proposal may increase the ood risk elsewhere? Yes D No a Don't Know I]
If yes, brie y describe how the risk of ooding might be Increased eIsewhere.
" Are there any trees on or adjacent to the application site? Yes NOE]
Ifyes, please show on drawings any trees (including known protected trees) and theircanopy spread as they relate
to the proposed site and indicate ifany are to be cut back or felled.
13. Waste Stora-e and Collection
Do the plans incorporate areas to store and aid the collection Yesm NOD
of waste? (including recycling)
Ifyes, please provide details and illustrate on plans
Ifno, please provide details as to why no provision for refuse/recycling storage is being made:
A ?baa. m 462640 r 6m; C41. 6 644444;;
14. Residential Uni s lncludin- Conversion
Does your proposal include new or additional houses and/or ats? Yes ENo D
lf es how man units do ou ro ose in total? (i.vy Y Y P P @U k v_ _ _ _ }
Please provide full details ofthe numberand types ofunits on the piano Additionalinformation maybe provided in a
suppon ing statement.
4 ' .Page 23
No embedded text on this page.
Page 24
No embedded text on this page.
Page 25
No embedded text on this page.
Page 26
No embedded text on this page.
Page 27
No embedded text on this page.
Page 28
No embedded text on this page.
Page 29
No embedded text on this page.
Page 30
No embedded text on this page.
Page 31
No embedded text on this page.
Page 32
No embedded text on this page.
Page 33
No embedded text on this page.
Page 34
No embedded text on this page.