Democracy Spraffa

2201248 Supplementary Report No.1 TPA 19.10.22

Argyll and Bute Council · 19 October 2022
Back to Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee — 19 October 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Argyll and Bute Council
Development and Economic Growth   
Delegated or Committee Planning Application Report and Report of Handling as
required by Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management
Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013 relative to applications for Planning
Permission or Planning Permission in Principle
_________________________________________________________________________ 
Reference No:   22/01248/PP
Planning Hierarchy:  Local Development
Applicant:   Mr Richard Stein
Proposal: Erection of detached garden room ancillary to dwellinghouse
Site Address: Eilean Da Mheinn, Harbour Island, Crinan, Lochgilphead, Argyll
and Bute, PA31 8SW
________________________________________________________________________
SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT NO. 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 
The attention of Members is drawn to the main Report of Handling dated 5th October 2022 that
is currently before them for consideration in respect of the above application.
Subsequent to the publication of the main Report of Handling for today’s (19th October, 2022)
PPSL meeting, officers have received further representations from both residents and the
general public. 
This has resulted in a total of 126 representations – 64 of which are in objections, 59 in support
and 3 neutral comments (including one received from a Local Member). Details of the
contributors and comments not addressed in the body of the main report are as follows. 
1.1 REPRESENTATIONS 
Local Member comment: 
 A neutral comment was received from Councillor D.  Philand 
Further neutral comment received from: 
 Ewan Campbell, 32 Keir Street, Glasgow G41 2NW 
Support comments were received from: 
 Bill Alexander, Blairintibberth, Bellanoch
 John, Sarah and Lindsay Dunlop, Crinan Boatyard Crinan
 Derek Smart, Crinan Boatyard Crinan
 Susan MacLean, Crinan Boatyard Crinan 
 Kerrien and Andy Grant Innisfree Achnamara Lochgilphead Argyll And
Bute PA31 8PX

Page 2

Objection comments were received from: 
 Cynan Jones, Sangha Aberarth Ceredigion  SA46OJX
 Ffion Jones and Rhodri Barker, 5 Penybryn Place Bethesda  LL57 3BE
 Aaron Berg, Round Wood Llangattock Vibon -Abel Monmouthshire NP25
5NJ 
 Donald McMillan, Clachan Seil Oban Argyll PA34 4TJ
 Owen Barker Flat 2 90 Wyndham Crescent Pontcanna Cardiff CF11 9EF
 Douglas Robertson 92 Fauldshead Road Renfrew PA4 0RU 
2.0 SUMMARY OF POINTS RAISED 
Neutral comment from Local Member
 Given that there are 111 representations to the proposed development, it
is requested that a pre determination hearing takes place to allow this
issue to be fully considered in the interests of democracy and
transparency with the opportunity to hear both sides of what is a sensitive
issue. 
 [Comment: This comment is noted. However, given that the land-use
planning related issues raised are not considered to be unduly complex, it
is considered that a hearing in this instance would not add value to the
determination process. The decision on whether or not to hold a pre-
determination hearing does however remain the prerogative of the PPSL
Committee.]
Other Neutral comment:
 The site is potentially an important trading site associated with the royal
site of Dunadd. This is shown by the presence of an Irish type of bead
dating to the 8/9th Centuries… an archaeological investigation should be
carried out prior to work commencement. 
 [Comment: This point is noted, however, the Argyll and Bute LDP map
does not depict the site has any archaeological interest and West of
Scotland Archaeology Service (WoSAS), the Council’s advisors on
archaeological issues, has not requested a consultation on the
application. Additionally, the development would be sited on an existing
ruins footprint which suggests the area would have been subjected to a
degree of disturbance. 
Support Comments:
 All raised comments addressed in the main body of the report. 
Objection Comments:
 All raised comments addressed in the main body of the report.

Page 3

Note: All other comments are addressed in the main body of the report. Full details of all
representations can be view on the Council’s website at www.argyll-bute.gov.uk 
3.0 RECOMMENDATION 
Officer’s recommendation remains as referenced in the main report of handling. 
Author of Report: Tiwaah Antwi          Date: 18th October 2022 
Reviewing Officer:  Sandra Davies    Date: 18th October 2022 
Fergus Murray 
Head of Development and Economic Growth