Democracy Spraffa

Appendix 1 - Objection P Kelly

Perth and Kinross Council · 27 March 2024
Back to Licensing Committee — 27 March 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1
CDS STL
From: Peter Kelly
Sent: 20 September 2023 18:35
To: CDS STL
Cc:
Subject: Re: 39 Dunbar Court, Gleneagles Village, PH3 - Objection to Short Term Lets
CAUTION: This email originated from an external organisaƟon. Do not follow guidance, click links, or open
aƩachments unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe. 
Dear Sirs 
Objector Name and Address – Peter Kelly, 20 Dunbar Court, Gleneagles Village PH3 1SE 
We wish to strenuously object to the applicaƟons for short term lets at 39 Dunbar Court. 
We own 20 Dunbar Court and short term lets has resulted in: 
 The area being much too busy.
 There being no car parking as groups are coming and taking over.
 AnƟ social behaviour, drunkenness and extreme noise/noise polluƟon, all of which combine in reducing our
amenity and that of our neighbours.
 Short lets guests driving cars too fast in what was a safe area for our children to play. 
It is clear short term lets are happening and will conƟnue to happen. Short term lets aƩract groups who use the
faciliƟes of the hotel and this results in those groups being drunken and noisy last at night. 
If the applicaƟons are granted, the issue will become more problemaƟc and severe. There will be no controls on
groups or behaviours and this anƟ social behaviour impacts heavily on owners and long term renters who come to
this safe haven to enjoy the amenity and quiet. All of this will be impacted by the behaviour of short term landlards
who simply wish to profit at the expense of the amenity of others. 
I understand the Owners AssociaƟon are objecƟng too and that short term lets may even be prohibited in the Ɵtle of
ownership. If this is the case, an applicaƟon granted would breach longstanding Ɵtle condiƟons that are there for a
reason. To stop disrupƟon by a minority of the majority. 
Many thanks for considering. 
Regards 
Peter R. Kelly