Appendix A – Consultation Report (Perth High School)
Perth and Kinross Council · 12 November 2025
Back to Learning and Families Committee — 12 November 2025 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
PKC - GENERAL PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL EDUCATION AND LEARNING CONSULTATION REPORT REPORT ON THE OUTCOME OF THE CONSULTATION RELATING TO THE PROPOSAL TO: Permanently establish a new Intensive Support Provision in Perth High School for pupils with Additional Support Needs with effect from January 2026. This Consultation Report has been issued by Perth and Kinross Council in accordance with the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010. Appendix A
Page 2
2 PKC - GENERAL Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. BACKGROUND 4 3. CONSIDERATIONS 5 4. REASON FOR FORMULATING THE PROPOSAL 6 5. SCHOOL INFORMATION 6 6. THE CONSULTATION PROCESS 7 7. THE PUBLIC MEETINGS 8 8. RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION EXERCISE 8 9. EDUCATION AUTHORITY RESPONSE TO WRITTEN AND ORAL 10 REPRESENTATIONS 10. EDUCATION SCOTLAND REPORT 11 11. ALLEGED OMISSIONS OR INACCURACIES 14 12. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 9(1) OF THE SCHOOLS 14 (CONSULTATION) (SCOTLAND) ACT 2010 13. LEGAL ISSUES 15 14. PERSONNEL IMPLICATIONS 15 15. CONCLUSION 16 16. RECOMMENDATIONS 17
Page 3
3 PKC - GENERAL Appendices Page Appendix 1 Minute of Public Meeting of 18 Appendix 2 Summary of Consultation Responses 23 Appendix 3 Education Scotland Report 29
Page 4
4 PKC - GENERAL PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL EDUCATION AND LEARNING This report has been prepared following consultation on the proposal that the Council: Permanently establish a new Intensive Support Provision in Perth High School for pupils with Additional Support Needs with effect from January 2026. Having had regard (in particular) to: (a) Relevant written representations received by the Council (from any person) during the consultation period; (b) Oral representations made to it (by any person) at the public meetings held on 31 March 2025 (c) Education Scotland’s report on the proposal. 1. INTRODUCTION This is a consultation report prepared in compliance with the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 on the above proposal. 1.1 The purpose of this report is to: • Provide a record of the total number of written responses made during the Statutory Consultation period; • Provide a summary of the written responses; • Provide a summary of oral representations made at the public meeting held on 31 March 2025 • Provide a statement of the Council’s response to those written and oral representations; • Provide the full text of Education Scotland’s report and a statement of the Council’s response to this report; • State how the Council reviewed the above proposal following the representations received during the Statutory Consultation period and the report from Education Scotland; and • Provide details of any omission from, or inaccuracy in, the Proposal Paper and state how the Council acted upon it. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 The Learning and Families Committee on 29 January 2025 approved a report (Report No. 25/19 refers) on an Options Appraisal for the expansion of Intensive Support Provisions (ISPs) in Perth and Kinross Council primary and secondary schools. The Committee agreed to commence with an expansion of ISPs through three phases over a three-year period. Phase 1 included undertaking a statutory consultation in respect of the proposal to open an ISP in Perth High School.
Page 5
5 PKC - GENERAL 2.2 In the report considered by the Learning and Families Committee on 29 January 2025, it was agreed that the Strategic Lead: Education and Learning (Chief Education Officer) commenced a statutory consultation in respect of the permanent establishment of a new Intensive Support Provision in Perth High School for pupils with Additional Support Needs with effect from January 2026 2.3 The duties in undertaking a statutory consultation on a relevant school proposal are outlined in the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 and the accompanying Statutory Guidance. 2.4 Learning and Families Committee reports and the Proposal Paper referred to above are available on the Council’s website www.pkc.gov.uk. 3. CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 The main considerations relating to the proposal are fully explained in the Proposal Paper , and the main points are highlighted as follows: 3.2 Perth and Kinross Council is dedicated to fostering a community where everyone can thrive, free from poverty and inequality. Their vision focuses on making the best use of public resources and ensuring continuous improvement of services. The Council's Corporate Plan emphasises collaboration to achieve key priorities, including tackling poverty, addressing climate change, and supporting sustainable places. Perth and Kinross Council aims to create a resilient, stronger, and greener local economy; enable children and young people to reach their full potential; protect and care for the most vulnerable; and support physical and mental wellbeing. By working in partnership with communities, they strive to create vibrant and successful areas, safe and sustainable environments, and educated and responsible citizens, ensuring every child has the best start in life. 3.3 Perth and Kinross Council’s Corporate Plan aims to tackle poverty, address climate change, and support sustainable places. This vision is further supported by the Council’s Learning Estate Management Plan and the Education and Learning Policy Framework Maximising Resources, which aim to enhance the range and quality of learning experiences for all. 3.4 Councils have a statutory duty in terms of the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 to make adequate and efficient provision of school education across their entire area for the current school population and future pattern of demand. 3.5 Councils also have a statutory responsibility in terms of the Local Government in Scotland Act 2003 to achieve best value. To achieve best value and optimum efficiency, the organisation of the school estate is therefore kept under regular review, including the need for school provision and other factors, such as altering catchment areas. 3.6 The Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 provides a strong, accountable statutory consultation process that local authorities must apply to their handling of all proposals of major changes to schools. These consultation processes are expected to be robust, open, transparent and fair, and seen to be so. They are also expected to be consistent across Scotland.
Page 6
6 PKC - GENERAL 3.7 The Education (Scotland) Act 2016 amends the Standards in Scotland’s Schools Act 2000 by adding in new duties to address inequality of outcome. These duties apply in different ways to both Scottish Ministers and Education Authorities. Where the Education Authority is making or implementing strategic decisions about school education, it is required to have due regard to the need to carry out its functions in a way which is designed to reduce inequalities of outcome. This is particularly directed in the Act towards pupils who experience those inequalities through socio-economic disadvantage, but there is also a power to extend the range of pupils who are covered by this duty. 4. REASON FOR FORMULATING THE PROPOSAL 4.1 The proposal to permanently establish an Intensive Support Provision (ISP) at Perth High School has been formulated in response to a growing and clearly evidenced need for enhanced local provision for pupils with complex and multiple Additional Support Needs (ASN) within the Perth High School catchment area. 4.2 Currently, Perth High School does not have an ISP, despite having three primary schools with specialist ISP settings in its catchment area. Young people requiring this level of support must travel to other schools within Perth and Kinross to access appropriate education. This results in longer travel times, reduced access to local community resources, and potential impact on social and emotional wellbeing due to separation from peers and familiar environments. 4.3 Perth and Kinross Council has a legal obligation under the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 and the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 to provide adequate and efficient education, including for those with ASN. The proposal aligns with these responsibilities and supports the Council’s commitment to inclusive education. 4.4 As of September 2024, 39% of children and young people in Perth and Kinross schools have ASN, with a significant number presenting with complex needs. The existing ISP network is under pressure, and the establishment of a new ISP at Perth High School will help meet current and projected demand. 4.5 The proposal supports the Council’s aim to reduce inequalities of outcome, particularly for pupils affected by socio-economic disadvantage or disability, as outlined in the Education (Scotland) Act 2016. Providing a local ISP ensures equitable access to high- quality education and support for children and young people requiring special education. 4.6 It is intended that the new ISP will utilise spaces within the new school building that are already specialist-designed classrooms and areas tailored to meet the needs of young people with ASN. 5. SCHOOL INFORMATION 5.1 Perth High School is situated in Oakbank Road, Perth, PH1 1HB. The school offers non-denominational secondary education for both girls and boys from S1 to S6, with a
Page 7
7 PKC - GENERAL capacity for 1600 pupils and a current enrolment of 1487 pupils. A new school building for 1600 pupils will be operational from August 2025. 6. THE CONSULTATION PROCESS 6.1 A link to the Proposal Paper was issued by letter to those individuals and bodies listed under Distribution within the document. The Proposal Paper was also published on the Council’s website: www.pkc.gov.uk 6.2 The Proposal Paper informed consultees that the consultation period would run from Monday 24 March 2025 until close of business on Friday 23 May 2025, which includes a period of 32 school days. 6.3 The proposal on which consultation took place was to: • Permanently establish a new Intensive Support Provision in Perth High School for pupils with Additional Support Needs with effect from January 2026. 6.4 The requirements for consulting on a relevant proposal relating to schools are set out in the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010. In accordance with these requirements: • A Proposal Paper was published on 17 March 2025. All statutory consultees were written to, providing a link to the proposal paper and details of where and how to obtain a paper copy. A copy of the document was available free of charge to the consultees listed within the document. • The Proposal Paper was published on the Perth and Kinross Council website and was available in paper copy upon request. • A public meeting was held to discuss the proposal on Monday 31 March 2025 at Perth High School. • The consultation period ended on Friday 23 May 2025. • Education Scotland’s involvement consisted of receiving the options appraisal and proposal paper documents, attending the public meeting, and a visit to the school, which included engaging with relevant consultees. They also received a copy of all online and written representations and the minutes of the public meeting. Education Scotland then prepared a report on the educational aspects of the proposal, which is attached as Appendix 5. 6.5 The following schools are affected by the proposal: • Perth High School • Abernethy Primary School • Abernyte Primary School • Craigie Primary School • Errol Primary School • Inch View Primary School • Inchture Primary School • Invergowrie Primary School • Kinnoull Primary School • Longforgan Primary School • Moncreiffe Primary School
Page 8
8 PKC - GENERAL • Oakbank Primary School • St Madoes Primary School 6.6 In accordance with statutory requirements and good practice, the following persons were consulted: • The parents of the pupils and children at the affected schools • The parents of children expected to attend the affected schools within 2 years of the date of publication of this proposal document • The Parent Council of the affected schools • Directly affected pupils at the affected schools • The teaching and support staff at the affected schools • The trade union and professional association representatives of the above staff • The Community Council • Relevant users of the affected schools • Elected Members of Perth and Kinross Council • Education Scotland 6.7 The number of letters issued with details of the Proposal Paper was 2580. 6.8 During the consultation period, representations were sought from interested parties, either in oral or written form or electronically. An online response form and generic email account was set up by the Council to receive representations and enquiries on the proposal. 6.9 This Consultation Report is the Council’s response to the issues raised during the consultation period on the Proposal Paper. 6.10 This Consultation Report is to be published on the Council’s website for a period of no less than three weeks prior to final consideration by Learning & Families Committee on 12 November 2025 7 THE PUBLIC MEETING 7.1 A public meeting was held in Perth High School on Wednesday 31 March 2025. Fourteen members of the public attended. A full note of the meeting is attached as Appendix 1 which details the questions and issues raised at the meeting. 8 RESPONSES TO THE CONSULTATION EXERCISE 8.1 A total of 33 online response forms were received during the statutory consultation period. Of these, 27 responses agreed with the Council’s proposal to establish an Intensive Support Provision (ISP) at Perth High School, 5 responses disagreed, and 1 response neither agreed nor disagreed. However, 12 responses were invalid due to missing required information such as name, address, or email, and were therefore excluded from the validated total. Details of the respondents are contained within the Summary of Consultation Responses, attached as Appendix 2.
Page 9
9 PKC - GENERAL 8.2 In summary, the oral and written responses and questions can be grouped broadly as follows: The majority of validated responses were in favour of the proposal to establish an Intensive Support Provision (ISP) at Perth High School. Positives Identified • Strong support for local access to specialist education for pupils with complex ASN. • Recognition of increased inclusivity and fairness for children with disabilities. • Reduced travel time for pupils currently attending ISPs in other areas. • Creation of a safe, tailored learning environment to meet diverse needs. • Opportunity for personalised learning and better support within the local community. • Support for keeping siblings together and easing transitions for care-experienced pupils. Questions Asked • Facilities & Infrastructure: Concerns about the suitability of the school building, access to quiet/safe spaces, natural light, and displacement of existing areas such as the Support for Learning zone and Library. • Education & Staffing: Questions on recruitment, staffing ratios, training for ASN support, and whether existing staff resources would be impacted. • Operations & Management: Enquiries about the timeline for implementation, whether the ISP would begin as a temporary provision, and how success would be measured. • Governance & Communication: Requests for clarity on eligibility criteria, placement processes, and whether pupils from other ISPs could transfer to the new ISP. Overview of Concerns • The ISP was not included in the original school design and planning. • Risk of reduced support for pupils currently accessing ASN services. • Existing staff shortages and resource limitations within the school. • Potential disruption to mainstream pupils and concerns about integration. • Vulnerability of neurodivergent pupils to bullying. • Impact on pupils with milder support needs who may not qualify for the ISP. 8.3 In summary, 2,580 letters were issued to consultees inviting participation in the statutory consultation. In total, 33 online responses were received, of which 21 were validated. Three written representations were submitted, all in support of the proposal. A public meeting was held on 31 March 2025, attended by 14 members of the public, where oral representations and questions were recorded. Full details of the responses and feedback are provided in Appendix 1.
Page 10
10 PKC - GENERAL 9 EDUCATION AUTHORITY RESPONSE TO WRITTEN AND ORAL REPRESENTATIONS 9.1 Was the ISP part of the original school design, and how will the space be adapted? Plans for an ISP were not included in the initial design of the new Perth High School as at that time projections for the requirement of ISP placements across the whole school estate were in line with the available capacity. However, increased need for placements has become evident and therefore planning to include an ISP in the new school building were revisited. The Council confirmed that the ISP will have dedicated ASN classrooms and shared access to other specialist facilities, such as life skills and sensory rooms. Adaptations will be made to ensure suitability for pupils with complex needs. 9.2 Will the ISP displace existing support areas such as the Support for Learning department or Library? The ISP will be incorporated in the new building for Perth High School which the whole school moved into in August 2025. The ISP is be placed where the original design of the school had the Support for Learning Department. Therefore, the Support for Learning department is located in a separate area within the school that is designed to be easily accessible and includes sectioned-off small workspaces within a large, bright area from the outset of operational use of the school building. The placement of the department ensures good access to support for pupils who require it. The Library has been positioned next to the English and Modern Languages departments, which is considered an enhancement to the school's overall layout. 9.3 What facilities will be available within the ISP, and are they fit for purpose? The ISP is designed to offer a high-quality, purpose-built learning environment for pupils with complex and multiple Additional Support Needs (ASN). The facilities planned for the ISP reflect a thoughtful and inclusive approach to education, ensuring that the physical spaces support both academic and emotional development. The ISP will include two dedicated ASN classrooms, each measuring 57m². These rooms are intended to accommodate small groups and allow for flexible learning arrangements tailored to individual needs. In addition to these classrooms, the provision will feature a sensory room (9.4m²), which offers a calming space for pupils requiring sensory regulation, particularly those with autism or sensory processing challenges. A life skills room, shared with the wider school and measuring 45.4m², will support the development of practical skills such as cooking and personal organisation, helping pupils prepare for independent living and post-school transitions. Further shared facilities include a medical room and an 18m² personal care room, ensuring that pupils with health or hygiene needs are supported with dignity and accessibility. A secure outdoor garden area will be available exclusively for ISP pupils, providing opportunities for outdoor learning, play, and emotional regulation in a safe and enclosed setting. The design of the ISP prioritises wellbeing, with quiet zones and sensory-friendly areas integrated into the layout. Although the ISP area does not have windows, natural light is provided through skylights, and the absence of visual distractions such as viewing platforms contributes to a calm environment.
Page 11
11 PKC - GENERAL 9.4 How will pupils be selected for the ISP, and what are the eligibility criteria? Eligibility will be determined by Perth and Kinross Council Transition Panel in line with Council policy. Placements will be based on assessed need and suitability of need. 9.5 Will pupils from other ISPs be able to transfer to Perth High School ISP? Transitions between ISPs may be considered where appropriate and will be considered by the Transition Panel. 9.6 How will the ISP support inclusion and integration with mainstream pupils? The Council is committed to inclusive education, with opportunities for ISP pupils to engage in mainstream activities and social interactions. The ISP will be designed to support inclusion in the mainstream school, with opportunities for pupils to engage with peers across the school where appropriate. Opportunities for involvement in mainstream activities will be tailored to the needs of the individual children, with all supported to realise their potential. 9.7 What staffing arrangements will be in place, and how will staff be recruited and trained? The Council confirmed that staff will be recruited with appropriate ASN experience and qualifications, and ongoing professional development will be provided. 9.8 Will the ISP be a secure area, and what safety measures will be in place? The Council confirmed that safety and security will be prioritised in the design and operation of the ISP, including the availability of a secure outdoor space. However, it should be noted that the doors to the ISP area are not secure. This aspect of the building’s open design will be monitored, and where necessary, considerations around pupil safety, particularly for those at risk of flight, will be factored into the placement criteria. Risk assessments will be undertaken to ensure that pupils are placed in environments that best support their individual needs and safety. 9.9 Will parents be able to visit the ISP before it opens? Requests were made for opportunities to tour the ISP. The Council committed to engaging with parents and providing access to view the facilities prior to opening. It is acknowledged that the initial access to the ISP prior to opening will be limited as the new building will not be completed until the end of the summer holiday 2025. Ongoing enhanced transition arrangements will be in line with that expected of all ISP placements. 9.10 How will success be measured, and how will the ISP support pupils across the ASN spectrum? The Council will monitor outcomes and ensure consistent support across all stages of ASN needs. Success metrics will be developed to evaluate the impact of the provision, including monitoring of the satisfaction of young people accessing the ISP and their parents. Opportunities to gain future feedback from the wider school community will also be sought. 10. EDUCATION SCOTLAND REPORT 10.1 In accordance with the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010, a report was produced by Education Scotland on the educational aspects of the proposal. The Education Scotland report is reproduced in full (Appendix 5).
Page 12
12 PKC - GENERAL 10.2 The purpose of the report is to provide an independent and impartial consideration of Perth and Kinross Council’s proposal to permanently establish an ISP at Perth High School for pupils with complex Additional Support Needs, effective from January 2026. 10.3 An Education Scotland HMIE Inspector visited Perth High School, the old building, and Inch View Primary School ISP, attended the public meeting held on 31 March 2025, and engaged with pupils, parents, staff, and stakeholders. The report supports the proposal and is summarised below: • Educational Benefits: HMIE Inspectors agree that the proposal offers significant educational benefits. The ISP has the potential to provide a high-quality learning environment tailored to the needs of young people with complex ASN, enabling access to a broad curriculum and opportunities for inclusion within the mainstream school. • The ISP could reduce travel time and support transitions from primary school alongside peers and siblings, strengthening community ties and improving continuity in learning and wellbeing. • Most stakeholders support the proposal and value the Council’s commitment to ensuring that resources allocated to the ISP are additional and do not detract from existing provision. Staff are enthusiastic about the ISP and keen to access further training. • Parents and staff emphasised the importance of managing shared spaces effectively and ensuring that extracurricular activities remain accessible to all pupils. Concerns were raised about bullying and the need for robust policies to promote positive relationships. A few stakeholders queried the flexibility of indoor and outdoor spaces. HMIE Inspectors recommend continued engagement to ensure these areas meet diverse needs and remain adaptable over time. • Concerns were raised about the ongoing construction of the new school site and the need for well-planned transitions. HMIE Inspectors recommend clear plans involving staff, parents, and pupils to support individual needs during the move. • Stakeholders raised queries about safe travel routes and transport arrangements. The Council is encouraged to clarify these plans in collaboration with families. 10.4 Perth and Kinross Council Response to Education Scotland’s Report The Council welcomes the report from Education Scotland and accepts its findings. In response to the findings contained within the Education Scotland report, Perth and Kinross response is as follows: 10.5 HMIE Inspectors note that stakeholders seek reassurance that resources allocated to the ISP are additional and do not detract from existing provision. They also request clarity on the use of shared spaces and the impact on the wider school. Perth High School is moving into a newly built school building in August 2025. Therefore, there will have been no existing use of any areas by subject departments.
Page 13
13 PKC - GENERAL The Senior Leadership Team in the school and Council officers have considered the suitability of use of all spaces in the school to ensure the best possible education opportunities for the diverse needs of all pupils. The Council confirms that the ISP will be an additional resource to the existing provision in the school, which will also maintain its existing Support department. ISP and mainstream pupils will have access to shared facilities including the sensory room, life skills kitchen, and personal care room. These spaces will be managed to ensure equitable access and minimal disruption to existing provision. 10.6 HMIE Inspectors highlight the importance of ensuring that indoor and outdoor spaces are flexible and meet the needs of young people. The Council will ensure that the design and layout of the ISP supports a range of learning experiences and is adaptable to meet the evolving needs of pupils. This includes access to secure outdoor areas and specialist environments that promote wellbeing and inclusion. 10.7 HMIE Inspectors recommend that the Council continue to work with staff and partners to address concerns about the internal location of the ISP within the new school site. The Council will continue to engage with staff and stakeholders to ensure the ISP is appropriately situated and that pupils have access to high-quality learning spaces. Feedback will inform any necessary future adjustments to the environment. 10.8 HMIE Inspectors note concerns about the school still being under construction and the need for well-planned transitions. The Council has worked with senior leaders, parents, and pupils to develop clear transition plans for those moving into the new school and the ISP. These plans are tailored to individual needs and supported by trained staff. Opportunities for parental involvement in transition activities will be provided. 10.9 HMIE Inspectors highlight queries regarding safe travel routes and transport arrangements. The Council will work with families to clarify transport arrangements for pupils attending the ISP. Safe travel routes will be established and communicated in advance of the provision opening. 10.10 HMIE Inspectors note that staff are keen to access additional training to support their work within the ISP. The Council will provide professional learning opportunities to build staff capacity and expertise in supporting pupils with complex ASN. This will include training in autism, trauma-informed practice, inclusive pedagogy, and other relevant areas. 10.11 HMIE Inspectors recommend continued engagement with stakeholders to address queries raised during the consultation. The Council will continue to work in partnership with the Parent Council, young people, parents and staff, throughout the implementation phase.
Page 14
14 PKC - GENERAL 11. ALLEGED OMISSIONS OR INACCURACIES 11.1 Section (10) (3) of the 2010 Act also places a requirement on the Council to provide details of any inaccuracy or omission within the Proposal Paper which has either been identified by the Council or raised by consultees. This section of the 2010 Act also requires the Council to provide a statement on the action taken in respect of the inaccuracy or omission, or, if no action was taken, to state that fact and why. 11.2 In the course of the consultation exercise, there were no areas identified by respondents as being inaccurate or omitted from the Proposal Paper during the consultation period. 12. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 9(1) OF THE SCHOOLS (CONSULTATION) (SCOTLAND) ACT 2010 12.1 Section 9(1) of the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 states that: After the Education Authority has received Education Scotland’s report, the Authority is to review the relevant proposal having regard (in particular) to: (i) written representations received by the Authority (from any person) during the consultation period; (ii) oral representations made to it (by any person) at the public meetings; and (iii) Education Scotland’s report. 12.2 Following receipt of the Education Scotland report, ten online representation and oral representations made at the one public meetings held during the consultation period, officers reviewed the proposals. 12.3 The feedback from the consultation was considered by officers where all the questions and comments raised were considered in detail. This ensured that the Council met the requirements to review the proposal under section 9(1) and 13(5) of the 2010 Act. 12.4 Officers of the Education Authority have listened carefully to the points made at the public meeting and have also considered equally carefully the Education Scotland report and the online representations. The proposal was reviewed to consider whether any of the representations led the Council to reconsider other options as being reasonable alternatives to the proposal. 12.5 None of the representations led officers to conclude that there were any other reasonable alternatives to the proposal, nor that the proposal should be reconsidered. 12.6 The educational benefits were reviewed in respect of the Education Scotland report and representations made. 12.7 There were no factors included in the Education Scotland report or representations made requiring any aspect of the educational benefits to be reconsidered.
Page 15
15 PKC - GENERAL 12.8 Having reviewed the Education Scotland report and feedback from consultees, officers concluded that the basis of the original proposal continues to be the most appropriate response to establishing a new Intensive Support Provision (ISP) at Perth High School. The proposal ensures that pupils with complex additional support needs in the Kinross area can access specialist education locally, enabling them to maintain connections with their peers and community. The Council remains committed to implementing the ISP in a way that enhances existing provision, supports inclusive practice, and delivers the educational benefits outlined in the proposal paper. 13. LEGAL ISSUES 13.1 The Council has complied in full with the requirements of the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 throughout this statutory consultation. 13.2 The Council is mindful of its duties in respect of equality, and the Equality Impact Assessment did not identify that any parent, child or young person would be treated less favourably as a result of this proposal. The proposed Intensive Support Provision (ISP) at Perth High School will comply with the Council’s Accessibility Strategy and will positively promote equal opportunities for children and young people with disabilities. 13.3 In terms of Socio-Economic Impact, the assessment identified that establishing an ISP within Perth High School will improve access to specialist education for pupils living in the local area, including those who may be economically disadvantaged. By reducing the need for long-distance travel to access appropriate support, the proposal enhances equity and inclusion for families across the community. 13.4 Under the terms of the Schools (Scotland) (Consultation) Act 2010, it is a legal requirement that the Council should not reach any formal decision without waiting until a period of three weeks starting on the day on which this Consultation Report is published in electronic and printed form has expired. 13.5 As it is the intention that this Consultation Report should be published, both electronically and in written form, if required, on 3 September 2025, this meets the statutory requirement to publish this report for more than three weeks before consideration of the proposal by Learning & Families Committee on 12 November 2025. 14. PERSONNEL IMPLICATIONS 14.1 Staffing arrangements for the new Intensive Support Provision (ISP) at Perth High School will be consistent with Perth & Kinross Council’s Staffing Standard and other relevant local agreements. 14.2 Consultation will be undertaken with school staff, Trade Unions, and professional associations where appropriate, to support the implementation plan for staffing the ISP. This will ensure that the provision is appropriately resourced and that staff are supported in delivering high-quality education for pupils with complex additional support needs.
Page 16
16 PKC - GENERAL 15. CONCLUSION 15.1 The Council now has 4 broad options to consider, namely: (a) adopt the proposal. (b) withdraw the proposal. (c) amend the proposal in some way which allows the proposal to proceed; or (d) amend the proposal significantly and undertake a further consultation exercise on a new proposal. 15.2 Education Scotland has identified that the proposal to establish a new Intensive Support Provision (ISP) at Perth High School has clear educational benefits. The ISP has the potential to provide a high-quality learning environment for young people with complex additional support needs. The proposed design and location within the school will offer flexible learning and social spaces tailored to individual needs. Stakeholders recognise the value of the ISP to the local community, particularly in enabling pupils to be educated closer to home, maintain peer relationships, and access specialist support within a mainstream setting. HMIE Inspectors agree that the ISP will enhance inclusive practice and support improved outcomes for young people. 15.3 If the Council adopts the proposal, it is understood that the educational benefits set out in the Proposal Paper would likely materialise. 15.4 The key points that have been highlighted during the consultation period are as follows: • Education Scotland’s report confirms that the proposal to establish an Intensive Support Provision (ISP) at Perth High School presents positive educational benefits. These include the creation of a high-quality learning environment tailored to the needs of young people with complex additional support needs, with opportunities for inclusion in mainstream activities and reduced travel time for pupils. The provision is expected to strengthen peer relationships and community connections by enabling pupils to be educated locally. • HMIE Inspectors commended the Council’s consultation and engagement efforts. They recommended continued collaboration with parents, staff, and pupils throughout the implementation phase to ensure that shared spaces are used effectively and inclusive access to clubs and activities is maintained. • Stakeholders raised queries regarding the internal location of the ISP, the flexibility of indoor and outdoor spaces, staffing arrangements, and safe travel routes. These concerns will be addressed through the implementation process. The Council confirmed that the ISP will be situated in addition to the existing Support department, with staffing aligned to staffing standards and additional training provided. Plans for secure outdoor access will be implemented, and safe transport routes will be clarified in partnership with families. • The proposal received broad support from consultees. The majority of respondents were in favour, and feedback from the public meeting, written submissions, and pupil consultations indicated strong agreement with the educational rationale and operational planning for the ISP at Perth High School.
Page 17
17 PKC - GENERAL 16. RECOMMENDATIONS 16.1 On the basis of the feedback received and taking account of the educational and social benefits of the proposal, it is recommended that the Council approves: • To permanently establish a new Intensive Support Provision in Perth High School for pupils with Additional Support Needs with effect from January 2026. David Macluskey Strategic Lead: Education & Learning (Education Chief Officer) 16 September 2025
Page 18
18 PKC - GENERAL Appendix 1 Education & Learning Improving Lives Together Ambition I Compassion I Integrity Statutory Consultation Public Meeting Minute of meeting held on Tuesday 31 March 2025 at 7:00p.m. in Perth High School Present: David Macluskey Education & Learning (Chief Education Officer) Strategic Lead Fiona Mackay Service Manager – Inclusion & Additional Support Needs Sarah Stephen Quality Improvement Officer - Inclusion Martin Shaw Head Teacher, Perth High School Karen Robertson Service Manager – Business Services Present: Jaclyn Meikle – Minutes ASN Transformation Programme Manager Councillor John Rebbeck Convenor, Learning & Families Committee 14 members of the public 5 Local Councillors Welcome and Introductions David Macluskey opened the meeting and welcomed the members of public in attendance to the Statutory Consultation Public Meeting. David introduced himself and the panel to the members of the public and thanked them for attending. Martin Shaw introduced himself and briefly outlined the positive impact he anticipated that an ISP would have for his school community. Format of meeting Fiona Mackay then explained the format the meeting would follow. The proposal Fiona Mackay explained the consultation proposal to the attendees. The Council proposes to: • Permanently establish a new Intensive Support Provision at Perth High School for pupils with Additional Support Needs with effect from January 2026.
Page 19
19 PKC - GENERAL Presentation A presentation was provided that explored the proposal in further detail and explained the background to the proposal and the reasons a new ISP is required. Fiona Mackay outlined: • The PKC Vision • Statutory duties of a local authority • PKC & National ASN Data • Explained the 4 levels of Staged Intervention (4-Intensive) • The existing geographic spread of ISPs within PKC • The requirement for an ISP at PHS Sarah Stephen outlined: • What is an ISP • Profile of needs commonly supported in an ISP and examples of how need may be met • The placement of the ISP within the school and what it will include • The benefits of an ISP Karen Robertson outlined: The statutory consultation process including the legal framework, consideration by Learning & Families Committee, the statutory consultation period and the different ways in which representations from interested parties could be made as the first part of the consultation process. Karen Robertson then explained the next stages of the process which includes the involvement of Education Scotland, the preparation and publication of the consultation report and the final decision made by the Learning & Families Committee, currently anticipated to be November 2025. Fiona Mackay then opened up the meeting to any questions, comments or observations from the floor. Q: When will the plan be formalised after the Learning & Families Committee agrees- will it be temporary first, then permanent? A: A report is expected to be presented to the Learning & Families Committee in November 2025. The provision will be established on a temporary basis from August 2025, and if approved, it will become permanent from January 2026. Q: The planning for the ISP at Perth High School appears to have been an afterthought rather than a primary consideration. Why was this the case, and what opportunities are other children missing out on due to the reduced space? A: Planning for the new school began long ago, and the concept of a new ISP was not in place at that time. The area that has been identified for the new ISP was originally intended for support for learning. In addition, generic spaces, such as meeting rooms, have been utilised to minimise the impact on other children. The new layout has relocated the library next to the English and modern languages departments, enhancing the school's overall layout. Q: Will children who currently utilise support for learning be able to access the provision as well?
Page 20
20 PKC - GENERAL A: The goal is to meet needs with minimal intervention. The support for learning space is moving to a separate area that allows easy access for the children who require to access it. The layout of this new area will include sectioned-off small workspaces within a large, bright area. Q: My child accesses a secondary ISP in another school, focusing on complex and profound needs. Would they meet the criteria for the Perth High School ISP, and would it be like-for-like? A: The new ISP will replicate what is available in ISPs in other schools, maintaining consistency with the 'assessment of need' expectation. Families are not required to move their child if their child is settled in another secondary ISP. An offer to discuss individual cases is available if moving a child would be beneficial. Q: What has been considered in relation to pre-transition support, P7-S1 assessment experience, and strategies? A: Support will be based on assessment, with some children accessing mainstream classes and others receiving bespoke intensive support. Specialist teaching in practical activities will follow a secondary model, with opportunities to attend art, science, and other classes using similar strategies. Q: Have the spaces for been allocated to pupils yet? If not, what is the process for identifying them, and who will be responsible for this? A: The first step was to review the current P7 students who live in the Perth High School catchment and have been allocated to another ISP, this allocation process was completed in term 2 of this school year. Now that we are at the stage of this consultation, we will consult with these parents first, as some may be interested in transferring. Following that we will support planning for other children who are in another ISP but who wish to transition to Perth High School ISP. Our goal is not to fill both classes this year, it should be a more gradual process of building up numbers. Families with children in S5/6 are unlikely to want to move ISP at this stage in their school career. Q: Can S1, S2, and S3 pupils in an existing ISP move? A: Choice will be given and offers will be made to pupils from S1-S4. There is an understandable reason why settled children would not want to move. Q: How does recruitment work for the extra staff required, and will it affect the start date? A: We are working closely with the school to advertise for experienced staff to fill the posts that will be advertised and are confident we can fulfil recruitment within the timescale. Recruitment will follow the same process as any teaching post, with interviews against key competencies. Existing staff with ISP experience may choose to apply, but it is not restricted to internal candidates and there will be a national advert for the skilled jobs. Q: How will it work timescale-wise with recruitment, the November report, and January 2026 opening? A: We are currently recruiting for an ISP Principal Teacher, who we hope will be in post before the summer holidays. This person will then be involved in recruiting the teacher and PSAs. All staff will be in place from August to staff so that the temporary provision has staff in place with permanent contracts.
Page 21
21 PKC - GENERAL Q: What are the staffing ratios? A: The staffing ratio is 1 teacher and 1 PSA for every 8 pupils, plus additional support for individual needs as deemed necessary. Q: My child is currently mainstream, moving up to Secondary School in summer 2027. Is there a flexible approach for these children? A: If ISP placement is needed to provide the right support for a child to access education, then a comprehensive assessment by the school and an educational psychologist will be undertaken. Requests are usually received to consider a change of pathway for a child as early as possible and ideally the assessment of need should be considered by the Transition Panel when the child is in P6. Q: Triangle of support (Staged Levels of Intervention): There are increasing ASN numbers showing at all stages of the triangle. Is there the same approach to support? A: Resource and support will be provided for children and young people at all stages; the intensity of this support increases the stage of intervention that a child is supported at. For instance, children supported at universal level will receive that support through the class planning that a classroom teacher undertakes. Support at other levels may involve a PSA or specialist teaching. Careful resource management is essential. The Scottish Government has allocated £715k to PKC for the year ahead, this will be used to support children and young people with additional support needs appropriately and is enhancing existing resourcing in school and the development of the new ISPs. Q: What would success look like for young people coming out of school having attended an ISP? A: Success is measured by equipping students to enter society and lead fulfilling lives. The ISP has the potential to support young people to thrive and is part of the school's mainstream offer. Q: Is there any criteria for an ISP place, such as being toilet trained? A: Assessment is based on wider needs, with no strict criteria. A holistic assessment involving parents, the school, and an educational psychologist will be conducted. Q: Is an ISP a secure area that children can't run off from? What is the access to doors? A: ISPs are often separate areas within the school, with children supported to remain in the environment. One existing PKC ISP is secure, which might affect a child's placement if this is a key factor. Risk assessments for flight-risk children will be part of the assessment. The transition panel will consider these factors, working with primary schools to gather full assessment information. Children will be placed in suitable environments and supported to develop risk awareness and independence. Q: Is outdoor space secure? A: The proposed ISP has its own enclosed garden area. Q: Accessing additional support at PHS is difficult. Is there a plan to introduce additional learning at all stages for staff to know? A: We are committed to improving support for staff. It is a journey for the entire system. Senior leaders are keen to engage with parents and support all staff at all levels to meet the complexity of needs. Needs have changed and increased since COVID, and we are working with all schools to deliver inclusive education.
Page 22
22 PKC - GENERAL Q: What will be in place to keep people safe (entering, leaving, etc.)? A: The school location has no general thoroughfare. The ISP is next to the Senior Management Team (SMT) space and guidance space, with staff always present. Doors contain and break up the area. There are no windows, but there is a skylight. There is ample space for movement to support regulation, and no viewing platform above. Q: Will there be an opportunity for parents to look around the ISP/new school before opening day? A: Typical academic sessions include parents' evenings and regular family learning events where these opportunities will be available in the future. Keys for the new Perth High School will be handed over during the summer break, with relocation happening between then and August. Initially, there will be limited access to the new PHS, but photos and images of new classes and areas will be made available to parents. Q: Have children already been earmarked for certain schools? A: Transition information will be shared first, and from there, staff will liaise with parents and schools to discuss the best placement for a child. Parents can always submit a placing request if appropriate. Q: Which current provision has secure access? A: Based on individual needs, schools can vary and have flexibility to adapt this approach, taking cognisance of certain risks like fire regulations. Perth Academy has had secure access in the past. David Macluskey, Education & Learning (Chief Education Officer) Strategic Lead thanked the panel, Councillors and members of the public for attending and closed the meeting.
Page 23
23 PKC - GENERAL Appendix 2 Perth & Kinross Council Intensive Support Provision at Perth High School Summary of Consultation Responses
Page 24
24 PKC - GENERAL The statutory consultation on the proposal to establish a new Intensive Support Provision at Perth High School commenced on Monday 24 March 2025 and closed on Friday 23 May 2025. Details of the proposal document were issued to the list of consultees contained within the Proposal Paper. 2580 letters were issued with a link to the proposal paper and details of where and how to obtain a paper copy. The Proposal Paper was also published on the Council website. A specific email address was set up for representations and enquiries. This was in addition to the usual methods of submitting representations. An online response form was set up on the consultation webpage. Online Response Forms 33 online response forms were received. 27 responses agreed with the Council’s proposal and 5 disagreed with the Council’s proposal. One response neither agreed nor disagreed with the proposal. However,12 responses were invalid as they failed to provide a required name, address or email address to validate the response. RESPONDENT GROUP NUMBER OF RESPONSES AGREE DISAGREE NEITHER Parents 18 15 2 1 Pupils - - - - Staff 2 2 - - Elected Members - - - - Parent Councils - - - - Community Members - - - - Grandparents - - - - Trade Unions - - - - Other 1 1 - - Not disclosed (Invalid) 12 9 3 - Total 33 27 5 1 Validated Total 21 18 2 1 Representations made were around: Family and Community Benefits Local Access: Positive feedback from a parent who values having both mainstream and ISP options within the same school and catchment area, supporting family unity and community integration. Staffing and Resourcing Staffing Challenges: Questions about where teaching staff for the ISP will come from, especially given existing struggles to support ASN pupils.
Page 25
25 PKC - GENERAL Dedicated Staffing: Emphasis on the importance of having specific staff for the ISP to avoid reducing support for mainstream pupils. Suitability of Facilities Building Design: Concerns that the current school building was not designed with an ISP in mind, suggesting it may not be fit for purpose. Quiet/Safe Spaces: A need for safe, quiet areas for pupils with additional needs to retreat to when overwhelmed or bullied. Natural Light and Environment: Questions about the quality of the ISP space, particularly regarding natural light and views. Financial and Strategic Planning Cost Efficiency: Suggestions that centralising ISP provision might be more cost-effective. Late Communication: Frustration that the ISP was not communicated earlier during the years of planning the new school. Consultation Document: Criticism of the consultation document for being vague and lacking clarity. Inclusion and Impact on Mainstream Pupils Integration Doubts: Concerns that ISP pupils may not be included in mainstream activities, questioning the value of placing them in a mainstream school. Disruption Concerns: Fears that ISP pupils may be disruptive to the larger mainstream population. Capacity and Future Planning Building Capacity: Agreement with the proposal is conditional on not reducing capacity for mainstream pupils. Scalability: A suggestion to plan for more ISP spaces than currently proposed, anticipating higher demand. Written Representations During the consultation period between 24 March 2025 and 23 May 2025, written representations were invited from statutory consultees and interested parties. 3 written responses were received. All 3 responses supported the Council’s proposal. Representations were made around: Support for an ISP at Perth High School to support transition. This provision may support care experienced pupils who require it. Ther potential that siblings can be kept together. Concern the ISP was not included in the original school design.
Page 26
26 PKC - GENERAL The allocation of space for the ISP and displacement of Support for Learning area and Library. Parents were not engaged about the inclusion of an ISP in the new school. Public Meeting As part of the statutory consultation process, 1 public meeting was held on 31 March 2025 at Perth High School. Attended by 14 members of the public. The questions and comments were around: Planning and Implementation Timeline and Formalisation: Questions about when the ISP plan will be formalised and whether it will begin as a temporary provision. Perception of Planning: Concerns that the ISP was an afterthought in the school’s design and planning process. Impact on Existing Space: Queries about what other opportunities or spaces may be lost due to the ISP. Access and Eligibility Eligibility Criteria: Questions about who qualifies for the ISP, including whether children must be toilet trained. Current Users of Support for Learning: Whether these pupils will also be able to access the ISP. Transfer Between ISPs: Whether pupils in existing ISPs (S1–S3) can transfer to the new one. Mainstream to ISP Flexibility: Interest in flexible pathways for children currently in mainstream education. Transition and Placement Pre-Transition Support: Considerations for P7–S1 transition strategies and assessments. Placement Process: Questions about how ISP places will be allocated and who is responsible. Earmarked Pupils: Whether any children have already been assigned to specific schools. Staffing and Resources Recruitment Process: How staff will be recruited, and whether this will affect the ISP’s start date. Staffing Ratios: Inquiries about the ratio of staff to pupils. Training and Support: Need for additional learning and training for staff to support ASN pupils effectively. Safety and Security Secure Facilities: Questions about whether the ISP will be a secure area, including access to doors and outdoor space. General Safety Measures: What will be in place to ensure safety during entry, exit, and throughout the school day.
Page 27
27 PKC - GENERAL Comparison with Other Provisions: Which current provisions already have secure access. Parental Involvement School Visits: Requests for opportunities for parents to tour the ISP or new school before it opens. Outcomes and Evaluation Success Metrics: What success looks like for pupils who attend the ISP. Support Across ASN Spectrum: Ensuring consistent support across all stages of ASN needs. Pupil Consultation Consultation was undertaken with Perth High School pupils and P5 – P7 pupils in all associated primary schools. The consultation took place between 9 and 23 May 2025. Perth High School Pupils 166 responses were received – 133 individual responses, 22 in a group with an adult and 11 whole class responses. 149 respondents indicated they had no concerns about having ISP classes at their school. 154 respondents did not think the new ISP classes would change their school day at school. Feedback examples: What do you think might be good about the new ISP classes at your school? Allow young people to fit in better and feel included. That they wouldn’t be spilt from friends and not feeling left out that they can’t go to the same school because of their extra needs. It helps people with special needs and gives everyone an equal chance at an education. That kids will get to come up to the school with friends and family, so they feel more comfortable. It will be a safe place for people who don’t like busy classes. They won’t feel left out That it'll make the school more inclusive People who need extra help from ISP can get it at a nearby school. I think that it will be easier for the pupils to come to school knowing they have friends there. Associated Primary Schools 106 responses were received – 77 individual responses, 2 in a group with an adult and 27 whole class responses. 90 respondents indicated they had no concerns about having ISP classes at their school. 92 respondents did not think the new ISP classes would change their school day at school. Feedback examples: Why do you think it is important for young people to attend their local catchment school?
Page 28
28 PKC - GENERAL So, they don't feel worried when traveling long distances and will be able to keep the same friends from their primary school. Because it will make them feel like everyone is equal, they should be treated kindly just like the others. It is easy to find familiar faces, so you feel more comfortable and less like a stranger in a strange place. It is not fair that people who have complex additional support needs have to travel far to get to the school that is right for them. So that if they have friends there, they can still see them. It will be quicker for mums and dads to get to the school if the ISP need anything. So, they don’t have to travel far and maybe see their friends from primary school, so they remember them. So, children don't have to travel so far as traveling can make people nervous and also more of their friends can be there with them. Be with friends and family members
Page 29
29 PKC - GENERAL Education Scotland Report Appendix 3 Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 Report by Education Scotland addressing educational aspects of the proposal by Perth and Kinross Council to establish a new Intensive Support Provision in Perth High School. May 2025
Page 30
30 PKC - GENERAL 1. Introduction 1.1 This report from Education Scotland has been prepared by His Majesty’s Inspectors of Education (HM Inspectors) in accordance with the terms of the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 (“the 2010 Act”). The purpose of the report is to provide an independent and impartial consideration of a proposal by Perth and Kinross Council to establish a new Intensive Support Provision (ISP) in Perth High School. Section 2 of the report sets out brief details of the consultation process. Section 3 of the report sets out HM Inspectors’ consideration of the educational aspects of the proposal, including significant views expressed by consultees. Section 4 summarises HM Inspectors’ view. Upon receipt of this report, the Act requires the council to consider it alongside any relevant considerations the council received and then prepare its consultation report. The council’s consultation report should include this report and must contain an explanation of how, in finalising the proposal, it has reviewed the initial proposal, including a summary of points raised during the consultation process and the council’s response to them. The council has to publish its consultation report at least three weeks before it takes its final decision. With all proposals the council needs to follow all statutory obligations set out in the 2010 Act. 1.2 HM Inspectors considered: • the likely effects of the proposal for young people of the school; any other users; children likely to become pupils within two years of the date of publication of the proposal paper; and other children and young people in the council area; • any other likely effects of the proposal; • how the council intends to minimise or avoid any adverse effects that may arise from the proposal; and • the educational benefits the council believes will result from implementation of the proposal, and the council’s reasons for coming to these beliefs. 1.3 In preparing this report, HM Inspectors undertook the following activities: • attendance at the public meeting held on 31 March 2025 in connection with the council’s proposals; • consideration of all relevant documentation provided by the council in relation to the proposal, specifically the educational benefits statement and related consultation documents, written and oral submissions from parents and others; • held a range of online and in person meetings with relevant consultees; and • visits to the site of the current Perth High School, the new site of Perth High School and proposed ISP space, and a visit to Inch View Primary School ISP, including discussion with relevant consultees. 2. Consultation process 2.1 Perth and Kinross Council undertook the consultation on its proposal(s) with reference to the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010.
Page 31
31 PKC - GENERAL 2.2 The consultation ran from 24 March until 23 May 2025. Details of the proposal were issued to relevant stakeholders and published on the council website. The website included a helpful video explaining the consultation in an accessible way. A public meeting was held on 31 March 2025, which 14 members of the public attended. The council received a total of 33 responses to its online surveys and three written submissions, Overall, most respondents were in favour of the proposal. A few were undecided and a few were against the proposal. Those against are concerned about the potential reduction and limits to available space within the new Perth High School, potential impact on staffing and the proposed location of the ISP within the school site. 2.3 Perth and Kinross Council undertook consultation with children and young people at local primary schools and at Perth High School. One hundred and six responses were received from the local primary schools, and 166 from Perth High School, including individual and group responses. Most children and young people had no concerns about having ISP at the school and did not think it would change their school day. Most children and young people are positive about the proposal. They think it is important for young people to have the opportunity to attend a school close to their home and with their peer group. 3. Educational aspects of proposal 3.1 HM Inspectors agree that opening an ISP provision at Perth High has potential educational benefits. Across Perth and Kinross, existing provision designed to meet the needs of children and young people who require specialist placements are at or over capacity. The council’s transitions panel had identified that an increasing number of children who live in the Perth High School catchment, will require access to a primary school ISP. It also identified that a number of young people who live in the Perth High School catchment, currently require to be placed in a secondary school ISP within another Perth and Kinross school. This proposed ISP provision has the potential to support the council in meeting the projected increase in the needs of children and young people requiring specialist support within the locality from January 2026. 3.2 The council has stated a range of educational benefits they consider this proposal will bring. HM Inspectors agree there that this proposal could support young people to access appropriate education close to home. Young people accessing the new ISP at Perth High School will be able to transition from primary school with their peers and siblings. This will help them to maintain important peer relationships. There are potential benefits to providing young people the opportunity to access social and community experiences through their school that help to build stronger connections within their local community. If approved this proposal should also reduce the distance travelled to school. There are also potential benefits to further the opportunities for inclusion in a range of mainstream school activities, as appropriate. 3.3 HM Inspectors agree that the proposed space for the new ISP provision at Perth High School could provide appropriate learning areas for young people with a range of additional support needs. If the council agrees to move forward with the proposal, young people will begin accessing the new ISP provision from January 2026. Interim arrangements to support the needs of a few learners in the broad general education will be in place from August 2025. HM Inspectors believe that the current available space has the potential to meet the learning and wellbeing needs of up to 16 young people. In the longer term, the council should keep the available space under review, as the council’s projections suggest that the number may rise
Page 32
32 PKC - GENERAL beyond this. The council should make clear the capacity of the ISP and its plans should the numbers rise. 3.4 HM Inspectors met with young people, parents, staff and members of the transition panel to discuss their views. Most are in favour of the proposal. They agree that young people requiring ISP should be educated close to their home and with their peers where possible. However, a minority of stakeholders who met with HM Inspectors raised a few queries in regard to aspects of the build and space. This included concerns about the internal location of the ISP within the new Perth High School site. HM Inspectors recommend that the council should continue to work with staff and relevant partners to consider this and how to meet best the needs of young people accessing the provision as it develops. This will ensure all young people have access to high-quality, appropriate learning spaces to meet their needs, including having regular use of secure outdoor spaces so as not to disadvantage them against their mainstream peers. 3.5 A minority of stakeholders, including children and young people, who met with HM Inspectors raised the concern that the new school site is still under construction. They also stated that all young people, including those with ASN, would require time and support to transition to the new school. HM Inspectors recommend that the council work closely with senior leaders, parents and all young people to make clear plans to support transition to the new school. Well-planned transitions should take account of individual needs supported by staff who have a clear and shared understanding of the requirements of those with additional support and those who are likely to be placed in the ISP from August 2025. The council should also consider opportunities for parents to be included in deciding on and participating in transition activities. 3.6 Stakeholders who met HM Inspectors raised queries on the proposed safe travel routes and transport arrangements that would be in place to support young people attending the ISP. The council should work with parents to make clearer the arrangements for safe travel to and from the ISP should the proposal be agreed. 4. Summary HM Inspectors agree that the proposal has potential educational benefits for young people with additional support needs. In opening a new ISP provision at Perth High School, more young people should receive the right support at the right time. The new provision should enable more young people to attend school in their own community, reducing unnecessary travel time and supporting connections with peers. This should help the council to meet the national requirements of the presumption of mainstreaming. Young people will have, where appropriate, opportunities to be included within the mainstream school alongside their peers. The new ISP provision in Perth High School will further support the council in meeting the projected increase of young people with a range additional support needs requiring specialist provision keeping them where possible within their own community. The council should continue to engage with stakeholders to address the queries they have raised. HM Inspectors May 2025