Democracy Spraffa

Appendix 1 - Business Case

Perth and Kinross Council · 25 March 2026
Back to Housing and Social Wellbeing Committee — 25 March 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
Appendix 1
Summarised Business Case
FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL FUNDED PROJECT
Title: Mid-Market Rent Proposal - PKC
Executive
Sponsor:
Elaine Ritchie / Serge Merone Version:
Author: James Ross Date: 27/02/2026

Page 2

2 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
Executive Summary
1. Strategic Case
1.1. Project Objectives
Mid-market rent (MMR) is a type of affordable housing aimed at households on low to
moderate incomes, designed to help them access affordable rented accommodation.
Homes for MMR are let under a Private Residential Tenancy (not a social tenancy)
however rent levels should be at or below Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates, to
ensure that they are more affordable than private rents. Broadly it can be seen as a
tenure that bridges the gap between social rent and private rent. There are criteria that
must be met to be offered an MMR tenancy.
National context
MMR is seen as an important component of the delivery of new affordable housing
nationally. Housing to 2040, Scotland’s long term national housing strategy, sets out a
target to deliver 110,000 new affordable homes by 2032, with 70% of these for social
rent, and the remaining 30% to be made up of low-cost home ownership and MMR
properties.
With the slowdown of low-cost home ownership schemes available, only 5 new shared
equity units planned within the currently agreed Strategic Housing Investment Plan
(SHIP) and the suspension, now lifted, of the Scottish Government’s Open Market
Shared Equity (OMSE) scheme, to new applicants, there has been a greater reliance
on MMR to deliver an alternative affordable tenure to social rent. The current climate
makes it increasingly challenging to deliver new low‑cost home ownership schemes.
Rising construction costs are undermining the viability of such models, as the market
value of a property must exceed the cost of building it. At the same time, high interest
rates are making mortgages less affordable for people on modest incomes. As market
values rise, properties become less suitable for inclusion in low‑cost home ownership
schemes, further limiting their feasibility
The provision of MMR can assist young people looking to enter home ownership by
providing a secure, affordable home, which enables them to save for. deposit on their
first home and so creates a stepping stone into home ownership.
MMR homes are often found in large urban areas to help those households on low to
moderate incomes that have difficulty buying their own home or renting privately but
who also would be unlikely to be allocated a social rented property. MMR properties
can also be provided in more rural areas where residents often experience similar
problems in securing housing within their community, as normally there is fewer
options.

Page 3

3 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
This tenure is broadly seen as providing a route for young people to secure housing,
often for the first time, alleviating the challenges they face navigating the housing
market with a lower income. However, the tenant profile of MMR is varied and often is
dictated by the type of housing on offer and its location, and so it should be seen as a
tenure open to all ages.
Through the affordable housing supply programme’s main grant fund, Registered
Social Landlord’s (RSLs) will deliver MMR properties via a subsidiary, and many have
substantial MMR properties as part of their stock.  Whilst Local Authorities can also
deliver MMR using Scottish Government grant, there is a need for a third party as they
are excluded from directly offering Private Residential Tenancies. There are different
approaches to how Local Authorities can deliver new supply MMR, and these are set
out in this paper.
Perth and Kinross
The Perth and Kinross Local Housing Strategy (LHS) 2022-2027 sets out the strategic
aims for housing within Perth and Kinross. This report aims to contribute to the
following actions and milestones within that strategy:
Action 1.1
Deliver PKC’s affordable housing programme of 1,050 homes over the next five years.
Milestone
 Achieve an average of 210 affordable housing completions each year
 30% other affordable tenure (315 out of total 1050 over five years – Low-Cost
Home Ownership (LCHO), MMR and Self Build).
Action 1.4
Seek opportunities to deliver a wider range of affordable housing options e.g.,
intermediate housing, LCHO and affordable self-build etc.
Milestone
 Carry out feasibility studies.
 Identify and develop partnerships to deliver wider range of affordable housing
options.
In Perth and Kinross there are three RSLs that currently operate MMR properties, with
a fourth RSL due to deliver new properties within the next 5 years. Kingdom Housing
Association has 124 MMR properties across Abernethy, Perth, Scone, Blairgowrie,
and Crieff. Hillcrest Housing Association has 87 properties across Perth and
Blairgowrie. LAR Housing Trust has 16 properties in Blairgowrie. Within the current
Strategic Housing Investment Plan, Places for People (PfP) are also programmed to
deliver MMR properties in Scone, thus adding further to the 227 existing properties.
The MMR properties by Kingdom, Hillcrest and PfP are delivered via the Strategic
Housing Investment Plan using Scottish Government grant to part fund the cost. LAR
however use a different model whereby Scottish Government loan funding has been
used rather than grant, with additionally sourced private investment to fund the cost. It

Page 4

4 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
is not known whether this loan funding will continue to be available for LAR to deliver
more homes in Perth and Kinross in that manner, though this is funding outwith the
Strategic Housing Investment Plan.
The Gannochy Trust, although not an RSL, are a charitable organisation within Perth
and Kinross with almost 300 properties that they let out below LHA rates and so also
make a valuable contribution to affordable rented accommodation in the area.
However, Kingdom, Hillcrest, and PfP are continuing to pursue further MMR
opportunities through the programme in Perth and Kinross and are being supported to
do so by PKC as part of our role as strategic housing authority. Housing Strategy will
remain in dialogue with LAR to consider any opportunities that fit in with their model.
Work is also ongoing within PKC to enable organisations to harness Rural and Islands
Housing Fund monies to assist the delivery of this tenure in rural areas also.
The broad objective of this paper is to ensure that the delivery of MMR keeps pace
with the targets set out in the Local Housing Strategy 2022-2027.
1.2. Existing Arrangements
The current framework allows for PKC to direct where MMR is delivered on sites,
where there is an identified need, though this would always be subject to a financial
appraisal by the RSL, who would deliver the product. PKC has also in the past used
commuted sums to support MMR projects where viability has been an issue, this
ensures that the projects do not falter and can be delivered in areas of strategic
importance.
PKC’s Housing Strategy Team are tasked with coordinating the Strategic Housing
Investment Plan, and it is via this document where the majority of MMR is delivered in
Perth and Kinross. Beyond this, support is provided to qualifying applicants to access
the Rural Housing Fund, where one of the potential end tenures is MMR. This is
valuable work to enable local communities to have real input into the delivery of
affordable housing local to them, but its outputs can be small, and time consuming,
and so its capacity to supplement delivery of MMR is limited.
The recently approved Strategic Housing Investment Plan sought to fund the delivery
of 1426 new supply properties with 124 of these being MMR. It was hoped that a
further 16 could be developed for low-cost home ownership, however this is proving
difficult to make viable. Unfortunately, the delivery of MMR and low-cost home
ownership homes are not keeping up with the expected targets, as these projections
indicate less than 10% being delivered against a target of 30%. Low-cost ownership
schemes are unlikely to deliver in the short term due to challenging conditions thereby
placing greater weight on the delivery of MMR. The previous 5-year delivery of MMR
also indicates that the Strategic Housing Investment Plan outputs will not increase
significantly the MMR delivery without some action.
1.3. Business Needs
Need and Demand

Page 5

5 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
Rents for MMR are capped at the LHA rate for first let, though are often slightly below
and so the need for this product tends to be in areas where private rents are higher.
LHA is the maximum rate of housing benefit a qualifying applicant can expect to
receive to cover the cost of their rent in a private tenancy, in any given market area.
For the properties proposed in this paper, the LHA rates are around 50% higher than
the rent levels set if they were PKC social housing and so should be seen as very
much a different type of tenure from social rent, albeit a recognised form of affordable
housing.
Often MMR is not deemed to be needed in areas where the LHA rates are too similar
to the market levels. Across the Perth and Kinross area, the private rents are higher
than LHA rates for all property sizes, though there is variance across the different size
of properties, as shown in Table 1 below:
Property
Size
Market
Rents
MMR
100% Difference 100%
Difference
95%
Difference
85%
Difference
1 Bedroom £452 £424 -£28 -7% -12% -25%
2 Bedroom £613 £558 -£55 -10% -16% -29%
3 Bedroom £836 £748 -£88 -12% -18% -32%
4 Bedroom £1,348 £1,247 -£102 -8% -14% -27%
Average £812 £744 -£68 -9% -15% -28%
Table 1: LHA/Market rates by property size for Perth and Kinross. 2022/23 data
The allocation of MMR, because it is different to social housing, allows for households
to apply for a property that has one bedroom more than the households needs.
Therefore, 2 or 3 beds would be a typical property size for new supply MMR and are
the house sizes where there is greatest variance between market rents and LHA
rates, indicating an alignment with need and prospective supply.
However, as table 1 also highlights, by ensuring that the rent levels are lower than the
maximum LHA rates, which would typically be the aim, the rent savings for all property
types can become substantial and would therefore allow a greater number of people
to access them.
Naturally, there are specific areas within Perth and Kinross where market rents are
higher and so places greater pressure on those seeking housing in the private sector.
Table 2 sets out where the highest average rents are and the size of property with the
highest rents.
Size 1 bed -
shared
1 bed 2 beds 3 beds 4+ bed Average
Eastern £490 £422 £604 £774 £1,406 £801
Greater Perth £437 £447 £609 £819 £1,282 £789
Highland £431 £518 £660 £923 £1,302 £850
Kinross £261 £508 £650 £873 £1,310 £835
Strathearn £456 £472 £625 £891 £1,483 £868
Comrie £446 £458 £565 £773 £1,496 £823

Page 6

6 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
Crieff £446 £458 £565 £773 £1,496 £823
North Eastern - £425 £650 £598 £1,600 £818
City Centre £431 £443 £600 £805 £1,209 £764
Perth & Kinross £441 £452 £613 £836 £1,348 £812
Table 2: Average market rents by location and property size. 2022/23 data
Whilst evidence here shows that Highland, Strathearn, and Kinross would be areas to
target delivery of MMR, it should be noted that it can be popular as a product even
when the savings households can make on rents is minimal. This is because
prospective tenants will consider aspects such as the quality of the property, the
likelihood that repairs will be attended to promptly, and the security the landlord can
offer.
MMR landlords are typically recognised organisations with a well-functioning repairs
system in place and as they are not private individuals, the risk of the property being
needed back by the landlord is diminished. Whilst the introduction of Private
Residential Tenancies meant that tenants had greater security of tenure than they did
under Short Assured Tenancies, there are still a number of grounds that a landlord
can evict a tenant under. These include, but are not limited to, the landlord wanting to
sell the property, undertake major repair, to live in the property themselves or let out to
a family member. This means that in practice, a prospective tenant will consider that
renting from a landlord with only one or two properties, comes with less security.
The locations where MMR has been delivered successfully in Perth and Kinross,
demonstrates that it is not only the areas where need is greatest that have proved
popular. All projects listed in table 3 have proved be in high demand and are
successful MMR schemes.
Site RSL Unit
Number
Year
Moyness (Hazelwood),
Blairgowrie
Kingdom HA 7 24/25
Duchlage Road, Crieff Kingdom HA 8 23/24
Broich Road, Crieff Kingdom HA 4 23/24
Earlsgate, Scone (over 55’s only) Kingdom HA 51 21/22
Glenalmond Road, Rattray Kingdom HA 6 21/22
Table 3: MMR delivery in 2020/21 - 2024/25 (5 years)
As noted earlier, MMR is not only targeted at those struggling to access good quality
private rented accommodation but also those that cannot afford to access the home
ownership market. For people living in communities where house prices are high, it is
especially difficult to enter this market with a modest income. The table below shows
the average house prices across a number of areas, and reflects the challenges faced
within Perth and Kinross in trying to access home ownership.

Page 7

7 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
Table 4:
Average house prices. 2022/23 data
Whilst the average house price can demonstrate, broadly, the challenges faced within
specific areas, it will include house prices of properties that many with modest
incomes will not be pursuing. To assess the impact of house prices on the those with
modest incomes, the lower end of the market needs to be considered.
2022/23 All
Sales
Average
Price
1st
Quartile Median
3rd
Quartile 4th Quartile
Eastern £228,176 £139,500 £219,975 £284,963 £844,626
Greater Perth £242,468 £133,390 £215,255 £315,548 £950,000
Highland £327,130 £187,000 £288,527 £432,500 £1,000,000
Kinross £305,881 £184,875 £283,000 £387,750 £800,000
Strathearn £313,241 £179,475 £270,000 £397,500 £995,000
Comrie £359,268 £202,488 £276,391 £389,250 £995,000
Crieff £286,330 £160,000 £249,450 £355,000 £865,000
North Eastern £354,616 £255,000 £280,000 £410,000 £844,626
Perth City Centre £205,533 £117,250 £187,886 £276,500 £780,000
Perth and
Kinross £274,907 £155,385 £239,500 £344,998 £1,000,000
Table 5: House price quartiles. 2022/23 data
Table 6 demonstrates how much a household would need to be earning, to purchase
a property at the lowest quartile in each area, assuming a mortgage multiplier of 3.2,
which is an affordable level. Many of the incomes listed below would be above the
maximum income an applicant for an MMR property could have and so shows how
out of reach home ownership is for many. It should also be noted. hat the more
pressured an area, the greater the constraint there will be on supply also and so even
if a household could afford a property at the lower end of the market, they are further
inhibited by a constrained supply.
Required for market
entry
LQ income
to buy
Ave income to
buy
Eastern £37,055 £60,609
Greater Perth £35,432 £64,406
Highland £49,672 £86,894
2022/23 All Sales Average Price
Scottish
Average
+ / -
Eastern £228,176.13 11,839.13
Greater Perth £242,467.80 26,130.80
Highland £327,129.88 110,792.88
Kinross £305,880.21 89,543.21
Strathearn £313,240.84 96,903.84
Comrie £359,267.96 142,930.96
Crieff £286,330.02 69,993.02
North-Eastern £354,615.54 138,278.54
Perth City Centre £205,532.71 -£10,804.29
Perth and Kinross £274,906.82
£216,337
58,569.82

Page 8

8 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
Kinross £49,107 £81,249
Strathearn £47,673 £83,205
Comrie £53,786 £95,431
Crieff £42,500 £76,056
North Eastern £67,734 £94,195
Perth City Centre £31,145 £54,595
P&K £41,274 £73,022
Table 6. Income needed to buy property. 2022/23
Furthermore, it should be noted that this reflects data from 2023/23, and it is known
that property prices and private rents have been on the rise, and so the current
situation is even more challenging for those on modest incomes than data here
shows.
Whilst traditionally MMR is seen as a tenure for young people entering the housing
market for the first time, it should not be seen as solely a tenure for the young. The
Earlsgate, Scone development has demonstrated that MMR is attractive to older
people also, if the property types are suitable and in the right area. Here, 51 properties
were delivered, managed by Kingdom Housing Association, and for over 55’s only,
with great success and high levels of demand.
Providing suitable, affordable housing for older people ensures that they are not left in
increasingly unsuitable accommodation as their physical capacity declines. This means
for those households their needs are better met and reduces the risk of reaching crisis
point and a sudden need for additional services. Beyond that, often these households
are downsizing and so it creates a chain by freeing up more housing for younger people
both in the social and private sectors.
The Scottish Governments ‘Mid-Market Rent Analysis: The Characteristics of MMR
providers and MMR tenants - December 2020 to February 2025’ shows that whilst most
tenants are below 34, there are tenants throughout the age groups living in MMR
properties.
2. Economic Case
A full Outline Business Case has been undertaken, including options appraisal, and can be
made available on request. This summarised business case, provides a headline summary
of the options available.
2.1 Options Available
Summary of Options
Option 1 – Do minimum / Business as usual
The starting point for any options appraisal is to consider whether any substantial actions
outwith current ways of working is required to achieve the results that are being looked for.
The current approach to deliver MMR in Perth and Kinross, as set out in 1.2, is to support
our partner RSLs to deliver MMR projects.

Page 9

9 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
To increase supply of MMR in Perth and Kinross within the existing framework, a re-
orientation of the prioritisation framework that is used to assess potential sites, so that
those sites delivering MMR are prioritised, could be done. This could achieve an increase
in supply with minimal intervention, though naturally still relies on partner RSL’s to deliver
them.
Furthermore, if needs can be identified, such as key workers, or over 55’s, a negotiation
can be had with our partner Housing Associations delivering these new properties to
ensure that suitable allocations can be made. If PKC contributes to a scheme by providing
additional finance via commuted sums, conditionality can be included to ensure that
appropriate groups are targeted. An example of this, was the Earlsgate, Scone,
development, which is an MMR project for over 55’s.
Option 2 – Leasing arrangement with RSL
A leasing arrangement is a type of agreement between the Local Authority and an RSL
that operates or is keen to operate in that Local Authority area. These types of
arrangements are used in neighbouring authority, Fife, where the Local Authority own 167
MMR properties that are managed by Kingdom and Ore Housing Association. PKC
currently has a leasing arrangement with Kingdom Housing Association, though this
relates to a social housing, rather than MMR, development in Perth.
This would work by PKC delivering new supply homes via its new build programme and
then leasing out the properties to a partner RSL’s subsidiary, who will then manage and
deliver those properties as MMR.
The leasing contract will set out:
 The length of the lease, how it rolls on thereafter, as well as any notification
periods.
 Delineation of repairs responsibilities. These can be divided up between planned
and reactive repairs, or a different negotiated position can be derived, right up to
full repairs responsibility being passed on as part of the lease.
 The leasing price paid by the RSL, including how yearly increases are to be
calculated.
 How allocations are to be administered and whether specific groups are to be
targeted.
The leasing price would be derived from a financial appraisal conducted by PKC, that
considers the cost of the following: 
 Construction, and other associated project costs, less any grant.
 Planned maintenance costs, if applicable.
 Ongoing costs, e.g. staff time, insurance, white goods
Once a leasing price is derived (which will vary by site, location and maybe the number of
units on offer), the prospective RSL, will then need to make their own assessment on
whether it’s a viable scheme or not, and thereafter this will inform rent levels charged to
prospective tenants. Naturally, the lower the leasing price, the more likely a below LHA
rent can be applied by the RSL.

Page 10

10 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
The properties will then be managed by the RSL until the agreement is terminated by
either party. As PKC are leasing the buildings to an RSL, it will be the RSL’s subsidiary
that is deemed to be the landlord of the tenants and not PKC and so Private Residential
Tenancies can be issued.
This approach can either be used indefinitely, or as part of a transition to option 3.
Option 3 – Establish a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)
Establishing a PKC Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) would be the most active approach
to take forward the delivery of MMR. This is an approach taken by Local Authorities such
as Stirling and Edinburgh. Stirling Council’s LLP, Steadfast Homes, has 128 properties
and is actively seeking more opportunities. Whereas Edinburgh Council’s LLP, Edinburgh
Living, has over 500 properties as part of its portfolio and similarly is continuing to look for
opportunities.
This would typically be funded via Scottish Government grant and a loan from PKC, who
would obtain the loan from the Public Works Loan Board (‘PWLB’), which is then ‘on-lent’
to the LLP. This on lending should come from PKC’s general fund, rather than the HRA
and would need to be approved by the Scottish Government. The loan would then be paid
back by the LLP as part of its ongoing business operation.
An LLP structure requires a minimum of two members to form, and so it would be a joint
venture between PKC and a second party.
External legal advice has been sought, and provided, which confirms
1. That the LLP set up is the most appropriate legal form
2. The legislative powers that PKC can use to establish an LLP to deliver MMR
3. The type of 2nd member that the LLP can have as a prospective 2nd member.
The key legal documents required to aid the governance of this LLP would be the
following.
 A Members Agreement
This is the main document between the Local Authority and the second member
that sets out and regulates what the LLP can do.
 A Facility Agreement:
This is the document that sets out the terms of funding from the Local Authority to
the LLP.
 A Deed of Entrustment
This is the document that ties the mid-market rent LLP to deliver a service of public
economic interest (SPEI) for subsidy control purposes.
 A Management and Maintenance Agreement:
This is the document that sets out the agreement between the LLP and PKC to
deliver management and maintenance services. PKC can do this in house or
contract this out to an external party.
PKC’s control and accountability would be enshrined within the governance structure to
ensure strategic objectives are met and gives PKC complete control.

Page 11

11 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
There are two different approaches as to how the management of such properties would
be undertaken, as different models are used by the Local Authorities, highlighted here.
Option A – External Management Organisation
The first approach is to contract an external organisation to manage the properties on
behalf of the LLP and pay a fee for this arrangement.  A procurement exercise would be
needed to establish who would be best place to contract this out to.
Option B – In House Management by PKC
The second would be to pay a fee to PKC itself to manage the properties. As PKC Lets, a
team based within the Housing Options Service, operates in this area currently for private
landlords, the council is in a unique position to have existing structures in place to manage
such a proposal or make minimal adaptations to current working to enable this.
Due to the reasons outlined above the proposal here is to implement option B, and utilise
PKC Lets as the preferred party to manage the stock.
3. Commercial Case
1.1. Procurement Strategy
The 13 new build properties relate to a developer led housing scheme within the PKC
new build programme. The PKC New Build Delivery Working Group, chaired by
Property Services, has procurement representation ensuring that all procurement
requirements are adhered to.
External legal advice from Burness Paul has been sought to consider the procurement
implications of the LLP, specifically the prospective 2nd member. This advice will be
adhered to, and only suitable 2nd members are being considered.
1.2. Service Requirements
The LLP will be formed of a ‘Board of Members’ and ‘Board of Management’ structure.
The Board of Members would typically be made up of PKC senior management and
elected members, with one representative from the 2nd member. Voting rights would
be weighted in favour of PKC so it had complete control of the LLP.
The day-to-day management of the LLP is delegated to a Board of Management,
appointed by the Member organisations. This would typically comprise of six
individuals, with five from PKC and one from the second member. The Board of
Management would be made up of senior officers from PKC who oversee its
operations day to day, and so this could be representatives from Housing, Housing
(Strategy), Finance, Legal, and any other appropriate dept.

Page 12

12 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
The maintenance of the stock would be contracted out to PKC Lets, however whilst
this is a service requirement, it is one that would be paid for by the LLP in terms of a
management fee.
1.3. Charging Mechanism
The development costs will be paid for as part of the PKC new build programme.
These works will be funded by Scottish Government grant, Council Tax 2nd / Empty
Homes, commuted sums and a capital contribution. The capital contribution will be
paid by way of a loan from the general fund. A payment schedule from the LLP to
PKC general fund will be required as part of the ongoing business operations, to cover
the cost of loan and interest.
The payment from the LLP to PKC Lets will be made via the management agreement,
a draft version of which is held on file that can be shared internally on request.
A budget for external financial advice has been included within the startup costs to
ensure that the appropriate financial arrangements are in place.
1.4. Risk Transfer
The exit strategy, should the LLP default on repayment of the loan, will consist of
various options
 The HRA can purchase the properties and convert all the tenancies to social
housing, with the loan being repaid to PKC.
 A partner RSL can be offered to purchase the properties to continue as MMR,
with loan being repaid to PKC.
 The properties can be sold on open market, with grant returned to Scottish
Govt, and loan repaid to PKC.
4. Financial Case
1.1. Capital and Revenue Requirements
A separate appraisal has been conducted to establish the viability of the development.
This sets out the capital costs in greater detail; however, the headline costs are set
out below
Capital
Scottish Government Grant (Resource Planning Assumption – annual affordable
housing grant allocation) - £1,213,864
Council Tax 2nd / Empty Homes - £260,000
Commuted sums - £220,000
Prudential borrowing - £1,380,000

Page 13

13 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
Total - £3,073,864
An allowance has been provisioned in for external legal and financial advice, bringing
the total capital contribution from the general fund to be on lent and paid back over 30
years at £1,380,000
Revenue
The main revenue implication is derived from the management and maintenance of
the stock. This will be undertaken by PKC Lets, though will be done for a management
fee of £450 per property, per year, paid by the LLP to PKC Lets. This fee will increase
3% every year.
Other revenue implications relate to the staffing required to be part of the ‘Board of
Management’ and ‘Board of Members.’ It is expected that this role can be subsumed
within current business operations and relates more to the governance of the LLP.
This will need to be kept under review as more stock is added to the LLP, and future
review may consider whether payment from the LLP to PKC needs to be made for
these services also.
5. Management Case (for preferred option)
1.1. Programme and Project Management Methodology
The new build properties will be managed and delivered in accordance with the
current process for PKC new builds. They will be sold to the LLP on completion as
they cannot be held on the HRA account.
The management of the LLP is set out within the suite of legal documents that sit
alongside this outline business case. These agreements are in draft form, with
finalised versions to be created in tandem with external legal advisers.
1.2. Programme and Project Management Plans
The delivery of the properties themselves will be part of the PKC New Build
programme and will adhere to project management processes agreed. The function of
the LLP is set out in the draft legal agreements held on file.
The proposal itself seeks to deliver on our Local Housing Strategy (LHS) vision that
“Everyone in Perth and Kinross has access to the right home, in the right place, at the
right cost."
It further seeks to deliver on the specific LHS objectives, such as
 Seek opportunities to deliver a wider range of affordable housing options e.g.,
intermediate housing, LCHO and affordable self-build etc.

Page 14

14 | O u t l i n e B u s i n e s s C a s e
 Achieve an average of 210 affordable housing completions each year
 30% being of other affordable tenure such as LCHO, MMR, Self Build
The proposed development sits within the Strategic Housing Investment Plan. This
sets out investment priorities in new supply affordable housing over a 5-year period.
1.3. Use of Specialist Advisers
External legal advice has been procured for initial advice and to assist with the suite of
legal documents needed to establish the LLP. They will support PKC Legal Services
in overseeing the establishment of the LLP.
A budget for external financial advice has also been included as part of the startup
costs, should that be required, to ensure that the necessary financial arrangements
are in place to adhere to regulatory requirements.