Democracy Spraffa

Appendix 4 - Open Space Survey Summary Report

Perth and Kinross Council · 26 August 2026
Back to Economy and Infrastructure Committee — 26 August 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Appendix 4
Open Space Survey Summary Report
Survey period: 11 July - 11 August 2025 | Responses: 212
Executive Summary
Residents are frequent users of open spaces, with 85% visiting at least several times per week.
Parks, public gardens and natural greenspaces are the most valued and frequently used assets.
Despite high usage, only 44% of respondents are satisfied with local provision while 32% are
dissatisfied, indicating scope for improvement.
Key Findings
• 54% visit open spaces daily and a further 31% several times a week.
• Parks and public gardens (82%) and natural greenspaces (79%) are the most regularly used
spaces.
• Walking/dog walking (31%) and taking children to play (24%) are the main reasons for visits.
• 70% feel safe when using local open spaces.
• 44% are satisfied with local open spaces, compared with 32% dissatisfied.
• 48% identify poor condition or maintenance as a barrier to greater use.
• 59% selected better maintenance and cleanliness as the top improvement priority.
• 47% requested public toilets and 38% requested better play facilities.
Overall Satisfaction

Page 2

Top Improvement Priorities 
Most Regularly Used Open Space Types 
Implications for Open Space Strategy
The results suggest that investment should focus first on improving the quality and maintenance
of existing spaces before expanding provision. Enhanced play facilities, public toilets,
accessibility improvements and increased seating would address several of the most common
concerns. Responses also indicate continued demand for children's play spaces and improved
green corridor connections.
Recommendations
1. Target maintenance improvements in frequently used parks and greenspaces.
2. Review provision of toilets, seating and accessibility infrastructure.
3. Identify opportunities for improved play provision.
4. Consider underserved groups when designing future improvements.
5. Use mapped responses to inform site-specific interventions and designation reviews.