Democracy Spraffa

Appendix 3 - Alyth NFM - Plans of Short Listed Potential Options

Perth and Kinross Council · 23 October 2024
Back to Climate Change and Sustainability Committee — 23 October 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Appendix 3 
Alyth Natural Flood Management Study (NFM) – Plans of Potential Options 
Option A Johnshill Burn culvert upgrades 
This option involves the replacement of the existing culvert to
accommodate 1 in 200 year flood flow (the flood event with a 0.5%
chance of occurring in any given year/also known as AEP) and will
reduce the risk of flooding to 10 properties from the Johnshill Burn.
Flood risk from Alyth Burn will remain. 
Figure 1 – Culvert upgrade on the Johnshill Burn (Option A)

Page 2

Option B Alyth Burn flood walls and Johnshill Burn culvert upgrade 
This option provides a 1 in 200 year (0.5% AEP) standard of
protection by constructing flood walls on both banks of the burn
around the centre of Alyth and upgrading Johnshill Burn. 
Figure 2 - Alyth Burn flood walls (0.5% AEP SOP) and Johnshill Burn culvert upgrade (Option B)

Page 3

Option C Alyth Burn weir removal, Johnshill Burn culvert upgrade and
flood wall 
This option provides a 1 in 100-year (1% AEP) standard of
protection and involves removing the weirs within Alyth, in
combination with Johnshill culvert upgrades and flood walls. 
Figure 3 - Alyth Burn weir removal, Johnshill Burn culvert upgrade and flood wall (1% AEP SoP) (Option C)

Page 4

Option D Doctor’s Burn channel upgrades 
The option provides a 1 in 100-year (1% AEP) Standard of
Protection by upgrading and raising flood embankments, creation
of a flood storage area and upgrading a culvert. This option
reduces flood risk to 40 properties. 
Figure 4 - Improved existing flood embankments, culvert upgrade and flood storage area on the Doctor’s Burn (Option D)

Page 5

Option E  Catchment wide NFM (excluding loch upsizing)
This option considered the implementation of a wide range of NFM
measures across the catchment of the Alyth Burn as illustrated in
Figures 7 to 11. 
Figure 5 - NFM options in the northern portion of study area (Option E)

Page 6

Figure 6 - NFM options in the central portion of the study area (Option E) 
Figure 7 - NFM options in the southern portion of the study area (Option E)