Democracy Spraffa

Torbothie Road Community Garden Proposal

North Lanarkshire Council · 2 November 2022
Back to Petitions Sub-Committee — 2 November 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

North Lanarkshire Council
Report
Petitions Sub Committee 
Does this report require to be approved? ☒ Yes   ☐ No
Ref SP/LP Date 17/10/22 
Petition – Torbothie Road Community Garden proposal   
From  Stephen Penman, Head of Strategic Communication  
E-mail penmanste@northlan.gov.uk Telephone 07947 997750 
1. Background 
1.1 The petition was received by the Council on 1st August 2022 and linked to ongoing
engagement around the proposal for this site, local residents and the main petitioner
Marlyn Thomson were informed that the petition would be referred to the petitions
subcommittee. 
1.2 The petition contains the signature of 83 residents 
Executive Summary 
The purpose of this report is to advise Committee of a petition received by the Council
objecting to the proposed community garden at the Torbothie  greenspace site. 
Recommendations 
It is recommended that Committee: 
(1) considers the content of the petition;
(2) acknowledges the decision to not proceed with the community garden proposal at
this time and remove the site from the list of surplus assets so that the council will
retain operation control of the land 
(3) Acknowledges the plan to sow wildflowers at the site to ensure it can be retained
for community use whilst minimising ongoing maintenance or revenue
commitment from the Councils perspective
(4) Notes that the Community Partnership Team will continue to work with members
of the community with the aim that a group could take on operation of the site in
the future  
The Plan for North Lanarkshire
Priority  Improve North Lanarkshire's resource base
Ambition statement (20) Improve the involvement of communities in the decisions, and
development of services and supports, that affect them

Page 2

1.3 The petition stated 
‘We the undersigned residents signing this petition unanimously and strongly object
to the proposed community garden in the Torbothie Greenspace. We are residents
living in the direct vicinity of this proposal and support neighbours’ objections. We
urge our leaders in the Council and our local councillors to her our voices and act on
our behalf now. This project is not wanted!’
2. Report
2.1 At the Shotts Community Board meeting in November 2020 Torbothie Greenspace
Project was added to the Local Development Programme (LDP) list as a potential
project and approved in principle pending further engagement, feasibility work and
receipt of a project proposal 
2.2   Following initial early receipt of a proposal for a community garden at the site, there
was further dialogue with local representatives and identification that the site had
been declared surplus to requirements by the Council. It was clarified at this point that
any project on this site would need be community led with a local community group
taking on responsibility and maintenance.
2.3      It became apparent through local engagement that while there was some support for
the development of the site for community use, there was not a local group able to
take responsibility for the site to allow the proposal to proceed at that time. 
2.3      Pauls Parcels had previously been in discussion with North Lanarkshire Council to
identify potential space for a community garden and growing area and subsequently
submitted a draft idea for the Torbothie site, taking into consideration feedback from
residents to date and building on the original proposal submitted by community
representatives with additional growing space to meet their needs. Further local
engagement and consultation took place via a survey and a drop in session. In
addition to the petition and feedback from local engagement the Council received
several emails from residents highlighting concern about the impact of the project on
those living nearby
2.4. As a result of feedback from local people it was agreed that:
• The Council will remove the land from the list of surplus assets so that the council
will retain operation control of the land.
• Alongside the Biodiversity Team the land will be sown with wildflowers and the
existing metal fence removed from the site.
• The community partnership team will continue to work with members of the
community with the aim that a group could take on operation of the site in the
future
2.5 The outcome is that the land will remain as an asset for the community to enjoy and 
will not be sold by the council. However the Council is not in a position to develop the
community garden proposal further if that would mean ongoing council maintenance

Page 3

and revenue commitment. This outcome has bee ☒ notified to the members of the
Shotts community board. 
3. Measures of success
3.1  Local people accessing the site for recreational use
4. Supporting documentation
4.1 None
Stephen Penman
Head of Strategic Communication

Page 4

5. Impacts ( http://connect/report-template-guidance ) 
5.1 Public Sector Equality Duty and Fairer Scotland Duty
Does the report contain information that has an impact as a result of the Public
Sector Equality Duty and/or Fairer Scotland Duty?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
If Yes, has an assessment been carried out and published on the council’s website?
https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/your-community/equalities/equality-and-fairer-
scotland-duty-impact-assessments
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.2 Financial impact
Does the report contain any financial impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant financial impacts have been discussed and agreed with
Financial Solutions?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.3 HR policy impact 
Does the report contain any HR policy or procedure impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant HR impacts have been discussed and agreed with People
and Organisational Development?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.4 Legal impact
Does the report contain any legal impacts (such as general legal matters, statutory
considerations (including employment law considerations), or new legislation)?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant legal impacts have been discussed and agreed with Legal
and Democratic Solutions?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.5 Data protection impact 
Does the report / project / practice contain or involve the processing of personal
data?  
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, is the processing of this personal data likely to result in a high risk to the data
subject?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, has a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) been carried out and e-
mailed to dataprotection@northlan.gov.uk 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.6 Technology / Digital impact
Does the report contain information that has an impact on either technology, digital
transformation, service redesign / business change processes, data management, or
connectivity / broadband / Wi-Fi?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact?

Page 5

Where the impact identifies a requirement for technology, has an assessment been
carried out (or scheduled) by the Enterprise Architecture Governance Group
(EAGG)? 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.7 Environmental / Carbon impact
Does the report / project / practice contain information that has an impact on any
environmental or carbon matters?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.8 Communications impact
Does the report contain any information that has an impact on the council’s
communications activities?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact?
Communication of decisions , engagement approach and process
has been communicated via community Bord meetings, emails to
residents and reports 
5.9 Risk impact
Is there a risk impact?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the key risks and potential impacts,
highlighting where the risk(s) are assessed and recorded (e.g. Corporate or Service
or Project Risk Registers), and how they are managed?