Democracy Spraffa

P056.2 (1,2 and 3) Working with Communities

North Lanarkshire Council · 22 August 2022
Back to People and Communities Committee — 22 August 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

North Lanarkshire Council
Report
People and Communities Committee 
Does this report require to be approved? ☒ Yes   ☐ No
Ref SP/MC/PMcC/LP Date 22/08/22 
Composite update report P056.2 (1,2 and 3) Working with Communities 
1. progress measures relating to individual local outcome improvement plans (LOIPs) and
work with partners to ensure appropriate delivery support.
2. Community Board Development Programme and Participatory Budgeting Task and
Reference Groups 
From  Stephen Penman, Head of Strategic Communication  
E-mail penmanste@northlan.gov.uk
costellom@northlan.gov.uk Telephone 07947 997750 
Executive Summary
This report provides an updated position on the work that has been carried out in line with
the Programme of Work item P056.2 areas (1) and (2) respectively. The report provides
an overview of progress relating to the implementation on the nine Local Outcome
Improvement Plans (LOIPs), the establishment of a Community Board Development
Programme and the creation of Participatory Budgeting Task/Reference Groups. 
The nine Local Outcome Improvement Plans (LOIPs) have now been published and can
be accessed via this link. The composite summary of LOIP priorities across North
Lanarkshire is attached as Appendix 1. An update is also provided within this report
regarding work with Community Planning partners, through the North Lanarkshire
Partnership Strategic Leadership Board, to better align operational partnership support
for delivery and the development of a shared performance and reporting framework. 
A previous report which was presented to the Community Empowerment Committee on
1st November 2021 detailed the outcomes of the Training Needs Analysis (TNA)
conducted with the nine Community Boards to assess the development needs of the
Board members.  This report provides an update on the key activities which have taken
place in line with the implementation plan, which was presented, as well as an update on
the new proposed timescales for launch of the programme to all nine Community Boards. 
This report also seeks to outline progress being made in the development and
implementation of the Council’s Participatory Budgeting (PB) process, in line with the
Programme of Work action to Establish Participatory Budgeting task reference groups by
Community Boards with implementation supported through the Community Board
development programme.

Page 2

1. Background 
1.1 Local Outcome Improvement Plans (LOIP’s) 
1.1.1 The Local Outcome Improvement Plans (LOIPs) covering each of the nine
Community Board areas have now been launched and published on the Council’s
website. The plans can be accessed via this link. Work is now underway with partners
and community representatives, and in some cases through the creation of
subgroups, to progress with key priorities. Work is ongoing with council services and
partners to ensure coordinated approach to the work linked to key cross cutting
themes such as: 
• Tackling Poverty;
• Digital Inclusion;
• Mental Health and Wellbeing; and
• Young People. 
1.1.2 Community Boards are provided with regular updates on progress against LOIP
priorities. Work is ow underway to establish and embed a partnership delivery
approach and LOIP Monitoring and Management Framework. 
1.2 Community Board Development Programme 
1.2.1 A Training Needs Analysis (TNA) was conducted with all nine Community Boards to
establish a programme of development for board participants with the aim of
providing support for participants to fully undertake and execute their roles as Board
members to optimum effect.  The outcome of the TNA was presented to Committee
on 1st November 2021. The results from which highlighted that there was confidence
in communication skills, the role of the Community Board chair and IT skills. In terms
of development priorities, 40% of respondents indicated that they would like
development on; participatory budgeting, the Council’s budget process, community
asset transfer, local development programme, local outcome improvement plans and
partnership working. 
Recommendations 
It is recommended that the People and Communities Committee: 
1. endorse the approach to date in respect of Programme of Work areas PO56.2 (1&2)
Working with Communities Model and Supporting Governance Structure as set out in
section 2 of the report
2. Agree to receiving future update reports relating to key components of this
Programme of Work  
The Plan for North Lanarkshire
Priority  Enhance participation, capacity, and empowerment across our
communities
Ambition statement (20) Improve the involvement of communities in the decisions, and
development of services and supports, that affect them

Page 3

1.3 Participatory Budgeting Task/Reference Groups 
1.3.1 In May 2021 Local Authority leaders renewed their commitment towards PB and
mandated COSLA officers to work with Scottish Government to review the 1%
Framework Agreement. The revised framework agreement extends the timeframe to
deliver on the 1% commitment to the end of March 2022 in response to delay caused
by the COVID -19 pandemic.  Subsequently Leaders were asked to review and sign
off on the renewed framework agreement while seeking further flexibility on
timescales for meeting the 1% target. COSLA recognised that during 2020/21 most
planned PB activity across councils was directly impacted by the work needed to
respond to the pandemic, resulting in delays in meeting the target. While the target to
allocate at least 1% via PB remains, there is a degree of flexibility available to
councils as to when the target can be practicably met or exceeded. 
2. Report 
2.1 Local Outcome Improvement Plans 
2.1.1 Local Partnership Delivery Teams 
The nine Local Outcome Improvement Plans have now been launched and published
and the focus is now on ensuring partnership approaches to drive progress under
each priority and the implementation of a robust progress tracking mechanism to
ensure a local focus with links to strategic approaches where cross cutting themes
have emerged. 
The North Lanarkshire Partnership Strategic Leadership Board recognise the
importance of ensuring shared ownership, accountability, and empowerment of staff
at all levels to enable deployment of adequate resource to plan with and respond to
community need. Engagement in the form of a survey and follow up event took place
with Community Planning Partnership agencies at a locality level to gain insight and
feedback aimed at shaping and refining a shared approach to driving local
partnership delivery of the LOIPs. 
Officers at all levels across the nine Community Board areas will require to provide
operational support to the delivery of the LOIPs. Four local partnership ‘teams’ made
up of senior officers from key council services and partner agencies have been
established to maintain oversight for delivery of the LOIP priorities and each of these
core teams will provide support for more than one community board. The ‘teams’ are
organised as follows 
• Cumbernauld, Northern Corridor and Kilsyth; 
• Airdrie and Coatbridge; 
• Motherwell and Bellshill;
• Wishaw and Shotts. 
The ‘core’ teams are made up of senior officers with oversight for deploying resource
at a locality level reflecting the following areas of business 
• NLC Community Partnership Team
• NLC Community Learning and Development 
• NLC Local Housing Team
• NLC Social Work 
• NLC Education

Page 4

• Scottish Fire and Rescue Service 
• Police Scotland 
• Health and Social Care North Lanarkshire 
• NHS Lanarkshire – Health Improvement Senior 
• Voluntary Action North Lanarkshire (VANL) 
The approach was launched at a session hosted by the NLP Strategic Leadership
Board on 10th June 2022. The locality teams are in the process of finalising their Terms
of Reference in preparation for implementation of the LOIP Monitoring and
Management Framework from Autumn 2022. Overall, the teams will be responsible for: 
• Driving delivery of the LOIPs through oversight for action planning, delivery and
ownership and monitoring and reporting on progress
• Co-ordinating and ensuring the action/response in relation to matters raised
through community boards, associated sub-groups and engagement activity 
• Developing solutions to common issues affecting service delivery in local areas
and progressing and supporting local work associated with priorities set out in the
Plan for North Lanarkshire 
• Planning and coordinating local engagement activity for maximum use of
partnership resource 
• ensure local matters are reflected as appropriate to the local community board,
committee, internal leadership, NLP SLB 
2.1.2 LOIP Monitoring and Management Framework 
The LOIPs capture what matters most to local people and provide the local vehicle for
delivering ‘The Plan for North Lanarkshire’ with shared responsibility and
accountability between all partner agencies. Having agreed these shared priorities, it
is critical that partners continue to work jointly with local communities to deliver on the
LOIPs. Partners at both a strategic and operational level must have a clear focus and
shared commitment to work differently through multi-agency approaches and early,
preventative interventions. 
A LOIP Management and Monitoring Framework has been designed to assist the
Local Partnership Teams in planning and managing their workloads and reporting
progress and outcomes to a range of audiences including the Community Boards,
People and Communities Committee and the NLP Strategic Leadership Board. 
Individual Management and Monitoring Frameworks have been established for each
Local Outcome Improvement Plan and will allow the Local Partnership Team for that
area to develop specific workplans for each priority theme with timescales, lead 
responsibilities, short-term outputs and longer-term outcomes all clearly identified. 
The LOIP Management and Monitoring Framework will ensure a structured approach
to tracking and reporting progress through the identification of clear milestones and
outputs that focus on the early stages of community empowerment and partnership
working. These are captured and recorded as ‘Structures, Capacities, Frameworks
and Material Benefits’. These definitions enable partners to quantify and assess
where community capacity, representation and resilience has been developed, for
example, or where there has been a direct and tangible outcome with material
benefits for local communities. 
Local Partnership Teams will work with community and voluntary sector organisations
to assess and prioritise their work at the outset by gathering as much information as

Page 5

possible about the priority theme and existing levels of partnership activity to address
the issues. Establishing a baseline and identifying the type of action that is required
will avoid duplication and ensure that LOIP and Community Board activity is fully
integrated within established partnership working arrangements and ‘The Plan for
North Lanarkshire.’ 
Extracts from the LOIP Management and Monitoring Framework, showing the Priority
Process flowchart and a sample LOIP workplan are attached as Appendix 2. 
The Management and Monitoring Framework aims to provide a vital management,
oversight, planning and scrutiny tool for Local Partnership Teams. Used properly, it
will allow teams to plan their workload over the course of the year, identify lead
agencies, track progress and demonstrate where partnership working is making a
real impact on delivery of LOIP priorities. The framework enables the teams to see at
a glance where a workstream is on track or potentially at risk of being significantly
behind schedule, under-resourced or unlikely to deliver anticipated outcomes and
may require further consideration or escalation 
The LOIP Management and Monitoring Frameworks will underpin and inform
reporting as outlined in the ‘Framework for Demonstrating Improved Outcomes for
Communities.’ The reporting schedule is as follows: 
• quarterly reporting to individual Community Boards
• six monthly reporting to the Strategic Leadership Board
• regular reports to the People and Communities Committee 
• statutory annual public performance reporting 
All Local Partnership Team members share a collective responsibility for ensuring
that the Framework is regularly updated and that there is adequate monitoring and
scrutiny of progress and performance at each Partnership Team meeting.  
2.2 Community Board Development Programme 
2.2.1 The Talent & OD (TOD) Team have been working closely with the Community
Partnership Management Team along with other Subject Matter Experts (SME’s) from
different council services to identify suitable resource materials for the development
hub. The following areas are active with a blend of resources available for members
to access:
• The role of Community Board Members – 28 resources
• Participatory Budgeting – 11 resources
• Local Outcome Improvement Plans – 23 resources
• The Local Development Plan – 4 resources
• IT skills – 7 resources
• Community Asset Transfer – 10 resources 
• The Council budget process – 5 resources
The following areas are under development where resources will be added as and
when they become available:
• The role of the Community Board Chair
• Partnership Working
• Community Engagement
• Identifying Areas of Improvement

Page 6

Presently there are a total of 88 resources available, 24 of which are e-learning
modules. The remainder are a blend of video, PowerPoint presentations, online
learning resources and links to useful external websites. 
There will be a function available for members to book onto live masterclasses as and
when they are scheduled. Any up-and-coming live masterclasses will be advertised
on the carousel on the right-hand side of the development hub. 
A video resource has been added to the homepage demonstrating how to navigate
the development hub. A guidance notes document which complements the video has
also been developed and emailed to all members. 
The development hub entered it’s test phase on the 4th March 2022. There were 34
testers allocated to review the resources and accessibility of the site.  The feedback
received was constructive and mostly positive, whereupon some slight amendments
to the hub were made to reflect the feedback. 
In addition to the 34 testers, an additional 71 members have been given access to the
Hub.  These additional members received their login details during May 2022 with
guidance on how to access and navigate the system. The Go-Live date for all
members to access the hub was agreed for the 23rd May. Within the guidance notes it
is fully explained the hub is still a work-in-progress, and therefore any tile with the
word ‘inactive’ is still under construction and resources will be added as and when
they become available. The word ‘inactive’ will be removed once the area has
resources available to access. 
In the meantime, the TOD team will continue to liaise with internal  and external
partners to gather resources for the development hub. Ongoing feedback from
members is important to us and can be emailed to TOD@northlan.gov.uk 
2.3 Community Board Participatory Budgeting Task / Reference groups 
2.3.1 It was previously agreed by the Community Empowerment Committee to proceed
with the establishment of Participatory Budgeting (PB) task/reference groups to
support the programme of work delivery P056.2 - (4). A briefing paper outlining the
role and requirements of such groups was presented to each of the nine Community
Boards during the November/December 2021 cycle of meetings.  Each Community
Board was tasked with identifying the most appropriate local structure to put in place,
supported by council officers, to progress Participatory Budgeting at a local level. A
copy of the briefing paper is included in Appendix 4 of this report. 
2.3.2 Where local structures have been agreed, two main options have been proposed.
The first is that the responsibility for delivery of PB sits within the remit of an existing
subgroup. The second is the formation of a new group to specifically look at PB
delivery. Both options will be fully supported through all stages by the community
partnership team. 
2.3.3 Not all Community Boards have agreed or implemented a structure to support the
delivery of PB. Where this is the case, continuing support will be provided to ensure
community voices are central to the successful delivery of the process. 
2.3.4 Following presentation of the briefing paper to each Community Board, the
mainstream PB action plan has been updated and will be used to finalise the initial
timelines that the task and reference groups will work towards. A copy of the North
Lanarkshire Mainstream PB Action Plan – Update is included in Appendix 5 to this
report.

Page 7

2.3.5 As part of the ongoing development of PB at a local level, the new task and reference
groups will be asked to identify a portion of budget to deliver a locality PB exercise. At
present the funding for this will be via current Local Development Programme
budgets. Each Community Board will be able to shape PB to most suit the needs of
their area focussing on local issues and LOIP priorities. 
2.3.6 Emerging opportunities around PB will be directly promoted via Community Boards
and relevant subgroups to further support local involvement in Council wide
processes.  An example of this is the Nature Recover PB (Greenspace PB) which has
been presented to all 9 Community Boards to increase engagement and participation. 
2.3.7 A short animation explaining PB for communities is currently available via a dedicated
PB page on the Council Website which includes further supporting information:
Participatory Budgeting (northlanarkshire.gov.uk). 
3. Measures of success 
3.1 LOIPs adopted across nine Board areas with measurable actions and milestones
agreed and implemented with outcomes tracked and reported on accordingly. 
3.2 In relation to PB approach, Community Boards progressing task/reference groups is a
measure of success particularly where seldom heard voices are participating and
along with other groups are supported to get involved in decisions over how public
budgets are spent. 
3.3 Services are delivered that meet the needs of the residents of North Lanarkshire. 
3.4 1% of the total estimated expenditure for revenue, as per the local government
finance circular, less assumed council tax intake, is delivered via PB. 
3.5 Effective Community Board PB task/reference groups are established and community
representatives receive appropriate training to support their activities in this area of
work. 
3.6 Positive feedback from Board members relating to Community Board development
portal. 
3.7 Evidence of input to the development through the year from partner and subject
matter experts. 
3.8 Uptake and usage of resources and demonstrable evidence of increased contribution
from Board members. 
3.9 Impact of Boards on the ground against priorities and outcomes as set out in the Plan
for North Lanarkshire.

Page 8

4. Supporting documentation 
4.1 Appendix 1 - Summary of LOIP Priorities across All Community Boards
4.2 Appendix 2 – North Lanarkshire Partnership LOIP Monitoring and Management
Framework – action prioritisation flowchart 
4.3 Appendix 3 - Updated Implementation Plan for the Community Board Development
Programme
4.4 Appendix 4 - PB Briefing Note
4.5 Appendix 5 - PB Action Plan 
Stephen Penman
Head of Strategic Communication

Page 9

5. Impacts ( http://connect/report-template-guidance ) 
5.1 Public Sector Equality Duty and Fairer Scotland Duty
Does the report contain information that has an impact as a result of the Public
Sector Equality Duty and/or Fairer Scotland Duty?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact?
The Community Board Development Programme contributes towards our
responsibility by increasing capacity and capability of board members to address
wider community and strategic priorities relative to reducing inequalities of outcome. 
An integrated Fairer Scotland/Equality Impact Assessment has been prepared
considering the findings of the initial phases of the roll out of PB.  Groups
representing people with protected characteristics were involved in the pilot PB
activity during the initial phases and have (and will continue to) inform the
development of the process.  PB has the potential to enable community led projects
which have a positive impact on all types of socio-economic disadvantage
experienced by people within specific community locations and communities of
interest. 
An integrated Fairer Scotland/Equality Impact Assessment has been prepared
considering the findings of the initial phases of the roll out of PB.   
Fairness and reducing inequalities is embedded in the approach to LOIP’s and
Community Planning and relevant assessments are undertaken for specific areas of
work or priorities as required 
If Yes, has an assessment been carried out and published on the council’s website?
https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/your-community/equalities/equality-and-fairer-
scotland-duty-impact-assessments
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.2 Financial impact
Does the report contain any financial impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant financial impacts have been discussed and agreed with
Financial Solutions?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
The LOIPs and wider locality planning processes will continue to be delivered within
the available resources of the Council and Community Planning Partners. 
The Community Boards development programme will mainly be delivered within the
available resources of the Council and Community Planning Partners.  However,
from time to time there may be some additional costs for specialist input or to secure
relevant resources – these will be met from existing budgets. 
Mainstream PB should be delivered within existing budgets and requires no
additional financial resource.  There are no additional costs associated with the
creation of Task/Reference groups through community boards 
5.3 HR policy impact 
Does the report contain any HR policy or procedure impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒

Page 10

If Yes, have all relevant HR impacts have been discussed and agreed with People
and Organisational Development?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.4 Legal impact
Does the report contain any legal impacts (such as general legal matters, statutory
considerations (including employment law considerations), or new legislation)?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant legal impacts have been discussed and agreed with Legal
and Democratic Solutions?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.5 Data protection impact 
Does the report / project / practice contain or involve the processing of personal
data?  
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, is the processing of this personal data likely to result in a high risk to the data
subject?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, has a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) been carried out and e-
mailed to dataprotection@northlan.gov.uk 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.6 Technology / Digital impact
Does the report contain information that has an impact on either technology, digital
transformation, service redesign / business change processes, data management, or
connectivity / broadband / Wi-Fi?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
In line with the Council’s digital transformation, a digital first approach will underpin
all aspects of the approach to these areas of the Programme of Work. Through the
needs analysis any accessibility requirements, reasonable adjustments, or a
requirement for alternative delivery methods have been identified to ensure that no
one is digitally excluded. 
In relation to PB development work continues on the Consul engagement platform at
a national level. The existing version of the site will move to a new version over the
coming 12 months which integrates My Account sign up in the platform. 
Digital Inclusion is a key priority across the 9 LOIP’s. Engagement is ongoing with
the Community Boards which feeds directly into the Council’s DigitalNL programme 
Where the impact identifies a requirement for technology, has an assessment been
carried out (or scheduled) by the Enterprise Architecture Governance Group
(EAGG)? 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.7 Environmental / Carbon impact
Does the report / project / practice contain information that has an impact on any
environmental or carbon matters?
Yes ☐ No ☒

Page 11

If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.8 Communications impact
Does the report contain any information that has an impact on the council’s
communications activities?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.9 Risk impact
Is there a risk impact?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the key risks and potential impacts,
highlighting where the risk(s) are assessed and recorded (e.g. Corporate or Service
or Project Risk Registers), and how they are managed? 
The proposals outlined in this report will support the controls and actions identified in
respect of the Community Engagement Corporate Risk in relation to the ongoing
work related to PB. 
In relation to Delivering for Communities and the ongoing delivery of the LOIPs, the
Progress Tracker (see Appendix 2) will ensure improved compliance with the
Community Empowerment (Scotland Act) 2015 and will function as a further
mitigation measure in line with the corporate Community Engagement risks.  The
action plans being devised in relation to the LOIPS will also indicate positive
progress and highlight areas where additional resources may be required. 
In developing the community board development programme, a number of high-level
risks have been identified, e.g. 
• ensuring that the needs of all Board members are understood;
• Board members invited to provide feedback on their strengths and
limitations; 
• Board members engage with the resources and development in place;
and
• development programme stays relevant and topical. 
The programme, in general is sufficiently flexible to deal with these risks and
appropriate measures are in place to mitigate any issues. Governance will provide
confidence in this area.  There will be a mechanism for annual review and input on a
regular basis from Board members.

Page 12

Appendix 1
Summary of LOIP Priorities Across All Community Boards 
Airdrie Bellshill Coatbridge Cumbernauld Kilsyth Motherwell Northern
Corridor Shotts Wishaw
Poverty
Mental Health
& Emotional
Wellbeing
Mental Health
Public &
Community
Transport
Digital Inclusion Community
Engagement
Children &
Young People
Community
Engagement
Community
Engagement
Covid-19
Recovery
and
Renewal
Poverty &
Food
Insecurity
Poverty
Greenspace
Maintenance &
Environmental
Quality
Food & Financial
Insecurity
Community
Safety
Social
Integration &
Inclusion
Community
Safety
Community
Safety
Mental
Health &
Emotional
Wellbeing
Covid-19
Impact
Digital
Inclusion
Youth
Engagement &
Consultation
Health &
Wellbeing
Digital
Inclusion
Community
Transport
Mental Health &
Wellbeing
Mental Health
& Wellbeing 
Digital
Inclusion  Digital Inclusion
Improving the
environment with
a focus on
Kilsyth town
centre
Environment  Moodiesburn
West
Tackling Poverty
& Inequalities
Tackling
Poverty &
Inequalities 
Community
Safety 
Targeted action
within identified
communities
across the Board
area
Youth
Engagement
Mental Health
& Wellbeing
Building local
relationships
trust &
communication
Digital Inclusion Digital
Inclusion 
Food & Financial
Insecurity
Public &
Community
Transport
Tackling
Poverty &
Inequalities
Health
Inequalities Environment Environment 
Communication &
Engagement
Targeted action
within identified
communities
across the Board
area
Town &
Community
Hubs & Town
Vision 
Town &
Community
Hubs & Town
Vision 
Transport

Page 13

Appendix 2 
LOIP Monitoring and Management Samples 
• helps Local
Partnership
Teams to
plan
potential
interventio
ns or joint
work
• aims to
assist with
avoiding
duplication
and
ensuring
that LOIP
and
Community
Board
activity is
fully
integrated
within
wider
community
planning
initiatives,
established
partnership
working
arrangemen
ts and ‘The
Plan for
North
Lanarkshire.
’
LOIP Priority Action flowchart

Page 14

Sample outcome and action templates to inform reporting

Page 15

Appendix 3
Updated Implementation Plan

Page 16

Appendix 4
PB Briefing Note for Community Boards
Establish Participatory Budgeting (PB) Task/Reference Groups
Community Board Briefing Paper 
Board Cycle 6
1. Purpose 
Following approval of Mainstream PB proposals at Council Committee, there is now a requirement for Community Boards to consider how PB
will best work in their local area and to establish a suitable task/reference group to take this forward. The Committee report which provides in
depth detail on PB and the associated Mainstream PB Action Plan can be viewed here:
https://mars.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/egenda/images/att97061.pdf 
The establishment and operation of this group will be supported through Community Board development sessions to ensure all members have
the required skills and knowledge to fully participate.
2. Background 
Participatory Budgeting (PB) is about local people having a direct say in how public money is spent.  PB also supports active citizenship in
North Lanarkshire, helping build more active and stronger communities that are:
• better able to take decisions on where public funds are spent.
• more likely to take part in community activities.
• better informed about public budgets and decision-making processes.
Additional information on participatory budgeting can be found on the Council website here: Participatory Budgeting (northlanarkshire.gov.uk)
which also includes a short animation explaining how a PB process can work.
Local investment has been identified as a key theme through the development of Local Outcome Improvement Plan through community
boards and we now need to establish task/reference groups at a Community Board level to consider local investment issues in line with The
Plan for North Lanarkshire and associated Programme of Work.  Where appropriate, and subject to available budgets being agreed by the
Community Boards, PB is one mechanism that can be used to prioritise and deliver projects and will be deployed when required and suitable
for local circumstances.

Page 17

Community Boards will direct PB delivery funded by the Local Development Programme (LDP) budget for each Community Board Area. It is
important to remember that PB is a mechanism for delivering projects with greater local input and is not a separate funding source. No
additional funding out with the previous reported LDP budgets is currently available for PB delivery.
3. Current Position 
Whilst PB can involve a public vote on projects, importantly it also includes the ongoing engagement with Community Boards on budget
allocation decisions. It important to be clear that the Community Boards Local Development Programme will not be fully delivered via a PB
mechanism involving voting on projects and will include community conversations and discussions where appropriate to support PB delivery. 
Certain project types that are supported through the Local Development programme such as parking to relieve local congestion issues and
CCTV to address identified community safety concerns will continue to be delivered through the existing Community Board process and
Committee approval process and will not be in scope for inclusion for PB. This is to ensure that the Local Development Programme retains the
ability to proactively target issues within communities as and when they arise and deliver projects in a reactive and timeous manner. 
As such, PB may not be the most appropriate delivery mechanism on every occasion and will instead become part of a suite of delivery
options. Each Community Board will lead on deciding such priorities for their area. 
Appropriate governance documentation to enable PB task/reference groups to progress has been prepared by the Community Partnership
Team and delivery of future projects will be financed via the Community Boards Local Development Programme and where possible,
community benefits and other sources of internal and external funding. 
Where appropriate, Community Boards may decide that an existing subgroup can take on the PB delivery role and there is no requirement to
establish a new task/reference group. This decision will be made locally by each Community Board to best reflect their local structure and
needs. 
Whether an existing subgroup or new task/reference group is used to take PB forward, there is a requirement that a Council officer is a
member of this to both provide guidance and advice on the PB process and to ensure appropriate financial governance is in place. 
Each Community Board will contribute towards the decision making on how PB operates within their area and how this is focussed to meet
local place based and thematic priorities.

Page 18

4. Next Steps 
Community Boards need to consider this briefing paper and appropriate approve the establishment of an appropriate participatory budgeting
task / reference groups (or similar) along with governance processes with implementation supported through the Community Board
development programme and by the Community Partnership Team. 
For further information please contact: 
Ross Dunn (Airdrie, Coatbridge): dunnr@northlan.gov.uk 
Christine Boyle (Cumbernauld, Kilsyth, Norther Corridor) boylech@northlan.gov.uk 
Gary Stark (Wishaw, Shotts) starkga@northlan.gov.uk 
Darren Wynn Jones (Motherwell, Bellshill): jonesd@northlan.gov.uk

Page 19

Appendix 5
Updated PB Action Plan 
Mainstream PB Action Plan
Stage Task Actions Comments Due 
Review and
Approval
Review PB Pilot
and report to
committee
Full review of
phase 1 pilot to
capture lessons
learned and
critically
evaluate
process
Short term task and review group
established to complete review.
Outcomes and recommendations
presented to Community
Empowerment Committee Feb
20.
Complete 
Prepare
mainstream
discussion
paper
Produce paper
for Heads of
Service
Research carried out on
mainstream delivery potential.
Paper produced presenting a
suite of options to achieve 1%
target.
Complete 
Seek approval
for Mainstream
PB proposals
from CMT
CMT report
required to seek
approval for
mainstream PB
Report produced which also
captures outcomes of recent
internal audit. 
Complete 
Seek approval
for Mainstream
PB proposals
from Community
Empowerment
Committee
Committee
report required
to seek approval
for mainstream
PB
Report produced which also
captures outcomes of recent
internal audit.
Complete
Development  Establish a
senior level task
and finish group
with terms of
reference 
Identify
appropriate
officers (third
tier)
Provisional list compiled. PB
budget streams need to be
clarified urgently to allow
appropriate officers to be invited.
Induction and training on different
PB methodologies to be provided
as required.
Complete 
Establish project
management
structure for
delivery of
Mainstream PB
Prepare Project
Brief and
Preliminary Risk
Assessment for
project for
approval.
Head of Communities will be
Project Sponsor and sign off
required to proceed. 
Complete 
Establish expert
delivery support
team 
Set up team
from CPT and
Finance.
Officers from CPT and finance to
be identified to progress. Lead for
delivery support team to be
identified.
Complete 
Develop project
management
model, action
plan and risk
register in line
with audit
outcome report 
Produce PB
delivery action
plan and risk
register.
Complete
project
management
documents
Working group to lead on action
plan and risk register. Risk and
Issue log to be created as part of
Project Management documents.
Create communication matrix and
set up lessons learned log. 
Complete

Page 20

Prepare final
documentation
for Community
Boards 
Produce full
suite of PB
documents
Draft documents have already
been produced in relation to
project led PB. To be finalised
and signed off.
Guidance to be produced on
service level PB and Community
Board role in influencing local
spend priorities. Mainstream PB
will be focussed on service wide
delivery rather than individual
projects. Anticipated that service
level PB spend will be agreed for
3-year period to avoid process
repetition.
Complete 
Support
colleagues to
establish
service level PB 
Expert team to
support set up
of PB at service
level.
Task and action will be
dependent on approved budget
streams. Individual services will
be expected to provide a delivery
team and directly support
Community Boards to identify and
direct localised spend priorities.
Ongoing
Initiation  Present PB
process to
Community
Boards to seek
buy in 
Formal
presentation of
Mainstream PB
Corporate presentation to be
produced with We Aspire/One
Plan thematic. Will require
graphics support to produce.
Presentation should clearly
identify various PB mechanisms
and be clear that not all PB
delivery relates to capital build
projects. Presentation to
emphasise the important role
community boards have in
identifying and reaching
agreement on local spend
priorities. Presentation should
highlight what budgets are in
scope with justification. Be clear
what elements are consultation
and what are informing.
Complete 
Present PB to
partner services
as approved to
commence roll
out of
programme
Formal
presentation of
Mainstream PB
Internal presentation to be
produced suitable for delivery to
services and schools (Head
teachers/staff). Presentation
should clearly identify various PB
mechanisms and be clear that not
all PB delivery relates to capital
build projects. School
presentation to focus on PEF
option for PB delivery with
relevant examples (e.g. lowering
cost of school day)
Complete 
Establish
Community
Board PB Task
Briefing paper to
be presented to
9 community
boards outlining
Briefing paper produced and
presented to each Board during
meeting cycle in Nov/Dec 2021.
Paper outlines options to localise
Complete

Page 21

Reference
Groups
requirement to
establish PB
task reference
group following
decision of
Community
Empowerment
Committee.
PB delivery and requests that
each board decides on the best
structure at a local level to
progress PB development.
Groups will be formalised in
advance of Feb/Mar 2022 board
cycle 
Provide support
to partner
services during
establishment of
Mainstream PB
Expert delivery
team input
Team to support PB processes
and organise training as required.
Ensure appropriate
documentation shared. Partner
service PB concept can be
launched publicly at this stage
through community boards and
Corporate Communication
channels. CPT to provide ongoing
community engagement to
support embedding of
mainstream PB process.
Work ongoing
with partners 
Publicise
process via
Corporate
Communication
s and seek
projects (only if
required for PB
mechanism)
Corp Coms to
promote PB and
call for projects
across all digital
platforms
(should relevant
budget be
available). CPT
to do likewise
directly with
community orgs.
Call for project proposals to be
open for a minimum of 6 weeks to
allow time for submission. 
Promotion of service level PB to
run alongside this to focus
communities’ attention on need to
identify local spend priorities
within relevant budget allocations.
(available budget allocation
should be identified prior to this,
considering any future efficiencies
which may need to be achieved) 
Set up CONSUL platform for PB
voting across 9 board areas
Work will
progress as
required 
Support and
lead sub-group
of Community
Board to short
list projects for
consideration
Community
Board to form
sub-group
CPT will produce documents to
support short listing of projects for
consideration by Community
Board.
Partner services will assess
response to service level PB and
feasibility to deliver.
Viability checks to be carried out
on all projects and service level
options to ensure deliverability
and sustainability.
Community
Boards
establishing
sub groups 
Community
Board to finalise
local PB lists
Community
Board to finalise
and announce
projects
included in
voting process
and service led
options.
Board consensus to be given
following short list process.
To include any direct project
voting results, compilation of
service level PB focussed on
local spend priority and school-
based proposals related to PEF.
Work will be
Progressed
through local
sub groups as
required

Page 22

Delivery  Report identified
PB spend to
COSLA
Pro Forma to be
completed
across services
identifying PB
spend for
2021/22 in
relation to 1%
target.
Pro Form circulated to all relevant
services to update identified PB
resources. Overall value of
Councils 1% target calculated by
Financial Solutions. Pro Forma
completed for COSLA return.
Complete 
Publicise
projects via a
series of local
roadshows in
partnership with
community
organisations
Individual
roadshow
required for
each PB area
(virtual or
otherwise)
Liaise with identified community
anchor organisations to host.
Promotion should clearly outline
identified Community Board
spend priorities for each of the 9
areas alongside any standalone
PB projects. 
Timescales to
be confirmed
locally as
required 
Open project
voting on
CONSUL or
alternate online
platform
Utilise platform
for online voting
Platform has previously been
used and has been further tested
to ensure suitability. CONSUL will
host PB project voting similar to
phase 1 pilot alongside.
Consideration to be given to
alternate online offering such as
MS Forms. Mainstream PB voting
to identify local spend priorities
for three-year period.
Timescales to
be confirmed
locally as
required 
Run voting
sessions in local
schools
Utilise schools
for young
people votes
All schools to be offered live
voting event. Will require support
of wider Communities team (CLD
schools’ staff and youth work
team alongside CCB staff) to fully
deliver in timescale. 
Timescales to
be confirmed
locally as
required 
Host a
community
voting event in
each Board
area.
(dependent on
current tier
restrictions)
Engage directly
with
communities
This action will include the
placement of ballot boxes at
strategic community locations to
maximise participation. Support
from Electoral Services required
to access ballot boxes. Public
event will include attendance by
relevant service representatives
to answer technical questions on
mainstream PB options.
Timescales to
be confirmed
locally as
required 
Close vote and
collate results
All online and
offline votes to
be collated
Results collation should be
carried out by each locality-based
team across the 9 board areas to
ease administrative burden.
Possibility to involve Community
Board sub-group in this process.
Additional admin support from
across Communities team may be
required for quick turnaround.
Service level PB assessment to
be carried out by individual
service owners.
Timescales to
be confirmed
locally as
required 
Results
announced and
Corporate/Com
munity Board
Projects to be passed to delivery
service for action in financial year
Timescales to
be confirmed

Page 23

projects
commenced.
announcement
of results
2022/23. Commencement of
delivery of aspirational 1% target.
locally as
required 
Project
completion and
evaluation
exercise
Projects to be
brought to
completion by
delivery service
Project evaluation questionnaire
to be produced for all PB projects
to record impact and value that is
brought to the community.
Timescales to
be confirmed
locally as
required 
Review of
Mainstream PB
process
Full review of
Phase 2 PB
process to
capture lessons
learned
Review to be carried out by
working group in two stages (post
vote and end stage) with report
and recommendations prepared
for future actions.
To be
progressed
following local
processes.