Democracy Spraffa

Update on Recent Scottish Government Planning Appeal Decision

Argyll and Bute Council · 18 October 2023
Back to Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee — 18 October 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Argyll and Bute Council 
Development and Economic Growth 
PLANNING, PROTECTIVE SERVICES AND LICENSING COMMITTEE – 18th October
2023
UPDATE ON RECENT SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT PLANNING APPEAL DECISION
_________________________________________________________________________
A) INTRODUCTION 
This report summarises the outcome of a recent appeal decision by The Planning and
Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) relative to the case set out below. 
B) RECOMMENDATION 
Members are asked to note the contents of the report. 
C) DETAILS OF APPEAL DECISIONS 
Planning Authority: Argyll and Bute Council 
Planning application ref:  21/02709/PP
Planning appeal ref: PPA-130-2086 (Planning Permission Appeal) 
Proposal: Variation Of Condition Numbers 3, 4, 5 And 6 And Removal Of Conditions 7 And 8
Relative To Planning Permission 20/01150/PP (Erection Of Dwellinghouse) Access
Arrangements 
Location:  Rhu Lodge, Ferry Road, Rhu, Helensburgh, G84 8NF
Date of decision: 05 Sept 2023 (Appeal Allowed)
This application was approved by the Council on 22nd March 2023. An appeal was
subsequently submitted to the Department of Environmental and Planning Appeals (DPEA).
The Reporter assessed the application in accordance with section 25 of the Town and Country
Planning Act (as amended) which requires development to be in accordance with the Local
Development Plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. 
The Reporters Decision Notice concludes: “In conclusion, I find that conditions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
and 8 attached to planning permission 21/02709/PP fail to meet the tests of necessity and
reasonableness, as set out Circular 4/1998. The appellant has demonstrated to my
satisfaction that it is neither necessary nor reasonable to require Ferry Road to be improved
to an adoptable standard given the location, nature and scale of the development proposed;
it is a lightly-trafficked private road within a conservation area. There is no evidence to suggest
that the council has undertaken an assessment of use to justify the package of improvement
measures to Ferry Road that it seeks. In the absence of such, I consider the improvements
proposed by the appellant are proportionate and would ensure that Ferry Road continues to
function safely and effectively. Furthermore, the appeal site’s location within Rhu Conservation
Area requires decision makers to take full account of the area’s special interest and ensure
that new development preserves or enhances its character or appearance. The council’s rigid
application of standards in its pursuit of infrastructure to serve the proposed dwelling house
suggests that it has failed to consider the qualities of the place before the movement of
vehicles; contrary to policies set out in Designing Streets and the LDP. Accordingly, I find that
conditions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 should be varied or removed as described above and as set out
in the schedule of conditions attached to this notice below.”

Page 2

Full details of the appeal decision can be viewed on the DPEA website: 
Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk)
A copy of the Decision Notice is attached at Appendix A.
D) IMPLICATIONS 
Policy: None. 
Financial: None. Personnel: None 
Equal Opportunities: None 
Author and Contact Officer: Kirsty Sweeney 01436 657665
Fergus Murray 
Head of Development and Economic Growth 
APPENDIX A: DPEA DECISION NOTICE