Democracy Spraffa

ITEM 17 Reporting Duties Health and Care (Staffing) (Scotland) Act 2019

North Lanarkshire Council · 27 March 2024
Back to Health and Social Care Integration Joint Board — 27 March 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1 
REPORT 
Item No: 17 
SUBJECT: Reporting duties for local authorities and integration under Health
and Care (Staffing) (Scotland) Act 2019 
TO: Integration Joint Board Committee
Lead
Officer for
Report:
Ross McGuffie NL HSCP Chief Officer 
Author(s) of
Report 
Stacey Anderson Support Services Project Manager 
DATE: 27 March 2023 
1. PURPOSE OF REPORT 
This paper is coming to the IJB for: 
For approval ☐ For endorsement ☐ To note ☒ 
2. ROUTE TO THE BOARD 
This paper has been: 
Prepared By: ☒ Reviewed By: ☐ Endorsed By: ☐ 
Stacey Anderson, Support Services Project Manager

Page 2

2 
3. RECOMMENDATIONS
To note the content of the report and be advised of the reporting duties for local
authorities and integration authorities under Health and Care (Staffing) (Scotland)
Act 2019. 
4.  VARIATIONS TO DIRECTIONS? 
5. BACKGROUND/SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES
5.1 Reporting duties for local authorities and integration authorities under Health and
Care (Staffing) (Scotland) Act 2019 applies to the provision of adult services,
children and young people’s services and early learning and childcare services. 
5.2 Reporting duties apply to all sectors where local authorities and integration
authorities plan or secure service from another person under contract, agreement, or
other arrangements. This includes funded providers. 
5.3 Part one, section 3 of the Act makes provision for local authorities and integration
authorities to publish annual information on the steps they have taken to comply with
the requirements when planning or securing a care service. 
5.4 The Scottish Government HCSSA Implementation Team intend to liaise with the
ministerial teams who have responsibility for children, young people, and justice
services regarding these new duties.   
6. CONCLUSIONS
6.1 To support reporting, the Scottish Government have devised a template which
consists of two questions. Ministers may review or revise these questions after
enactment on 1 April 2024. You will find these below: 
1) Please detail the steps you have taken as an organisation to comply with
section 3(2) of the Health and Care (Staffing) (Scotland) Act 2019 
2) Please detail any ongoing risks that may affect your ability to comply with the
duty set out in section 3(2). 
Yes  ☐ No ☒ N/A ☐

Page 3

3 
6.2 The attached HCSA Q2 Reporting Template details the most recent update
report to Scottish Government from a North Lanarkshire Health and Social Care
Partnership Nursing perspective. This template and submission has been used as
part of a pilot to test the quarterly return report prior to enactment. 
6.3 Once the official template and report guidance has been issued, a further report
will be shared with the IJB. 
7. IMPLICATIONS 
7.1 NATIONAL OUTCOMES
Link(s) to National Health and Wellbeing Outcomes 
People are able to look after and improve their own health and wellbeing
and live in good health for longer 
☐
People, including those with disabilities or long-term conditions, or who are
frail, are able to live, as far as reasonable practicable, independently and at
home or in a homely setting in their community
☐
People who use Health and Social Care Services have positive
experiences of those services, and have dignity respected
☐
Health and Social Care Services are centred on helping to maintain or
improve the quality of life of people who use those services 
☐
Health and Social Care Services contribute to reducing health inequalities  ☐
People who use Health and Social Care Services are safe from harm ☒
People who work in Health and Social Care Services feel engaged with the
work they do and are supported to continuously improve the information,
support, care and treatment they provide
☒
Resources are used effectively and efficiently in the provision of Health and
Social Care Services 
☒
7.2 ASSOCIATED MEASURE(S) 
7.3 FINANCIAL 
This paper has been reviewed by Finance: 
Yes  ☐ No ☐ N/A ☒

Page 4

4 
7.4 RISK ASSESSMENT/RISK MANAGEMENT 
Relevant Risk Register
Details 
Current Risk Level  Risk Owner 
Choose an item. 
7.5  ENGAGEMENT & PARTICPATION
Please tick the engagement and participation objectives that link(s) with this piece of
work and provide further details regarding the engagement and participation that was
undertaken.
Objectives  Further Details 
☐ Involve stakeholders in the development
work aimed at achieving the national 
outcomes 
☐ Provide stakeholders with information on
how to get involved 
☐ Ensure a diverse range of engagement
and participation and opportunities are in 
place to suit different needs 
☐ Measure how well we involve community
stakeholders in the planning, design 
and delivery of our services 
☐ Provide regular feedback on how
stakeholder engagement and participation is 
shaping and influencing service
development and delivery 
☐ Provide support to enable stakeholder
representatives to participate meaningfully
and confidently at meetings 
☐ Develop participation guidelines to
ensure a common understanding and set of 
expectations for both stakeholders and
partnership staff 
☐ Support engagement planning and
participation in localities, taking account of 
other engagement activity and local plans
across the Community Planning 
Partnership

Page 5

5 
7.6 INEQUALITIES & FAIRER SCOTLAND DUTY 
EQIA Completed & Fairer Scotland Impact Assessment Form Completed and
attached to report: 
EQIA added to website: 
8. BACKGROUND PAPERS
Health and Care (Staffing) (Scotland) Act 2019 (legislation.gov.uk)
9. APPENDICES
Please include a glossary of terms if not already included. 
9.1  Appendix 1- HCSA – Q2 Reporting Template 
CHIEF ACCOUNTABLE OFFICER (or Depute)   
Members seeking further information about any aspect of this report, please contact
the following; Ross McGuffie Ross.McGuffie@lanarkshire.scot.nhs.uk
Yes  ☐ No ☐ N/A ☒
Yes /
Date
added 
☐ No ☐ N/A ☒

Page 6

6 
Direction from North Lanarkshire Integration Joint Board (IJB) 
1 Reference Number  
2 Report Title  
3 Date direction issued by IJB 
4 Date from which direction
takes effect 
5 Direction to: 
6 Does this direction
supersede, revise or revoke a
previous direction – if yes,
include reference number(s) 
7 Functions covered by
direction 
8 Full text of direction 
9 Budget allocated by
Integration Joint Board to
carry out direction 
10 Performance Management /
Governance arrangements 
11 Date direction will be
reviewed

Page 7

7 
Appendix 1 
1
2
3
4
Summary report
Please answer the questions below, to provide an overall assessment of how the organisation has carried out its duties under section 2 of the 2019 Act, and sections 12IA, 12IC, 12ID, 12IE, 12IF, 12IH, 12II,
12IJ and 12IL of the 1978 Act (inserted by section 4 of the 2019 Act).
Please advise how the information provided in this report has been used or will be used to inform workforce plans.
Please summarise any key achievements and outcomes as a consequence of carrying out the duties and
requirements in the Act. For the quarterly returns this will be key acheivements and outcomes in preparation for
compliance. Please also detail the objectives for the next quarter.
Please summarise any key learning and risks identified as a consequence of carrying out the duties and requirements
in the Act. For the quarterly returns this will be key learning and risks identified in preparation for compliance.
Reasonable Assurance
Please indicate the overall level of assurance of the organisation's compliance with the Act, reflecting the report submitted.
For the quarterly returns this will be overall level of assurance of the organisation's preparedness for enactment in April 2024.
The information contained in this workplan has been used to identify outstanding work to hep us prepare for implementation
of the act and we now have a action plan which we are monitoring closley.
Training has been undertaken with all senior leaders in the organisation to senior charge nurse/ team leader level on safe
staffing legislation and also safe rostering. Staff feedback from both these sessions have been extremely positive.
Challenges in running tools within integrated tools where full staffing and skill mix is not included. It is not clear how useful
this information will be in workforce planning. If staff don’t see the direct link there is concern that participation in tool runs will
dip.

Page 8

8 
1 Guiding principles for health and care staffing
2 Guiding principles etc. in health and care staffing and planning
Guidance chapter link
Section Status
12IA(1) Green
12IA(2)(a) Green
12IA(2)(b) Green
12IA(2)(c) Green
12IA(2)(d) Green
12IA(2)(e) Green
2(1) Green
N/A Green
These are steps taken to comply with 12IA in general. Examples could include information about workforce planning, national and international recruitment, retention, retire and return, service redesign, innovation, staff wellbeing, policies around supplementary staffing,
This should include, but not be limited to data in relation to patient safety and quality of care measures and outcomes, patient feedback and adverse event reporting.
These systems and processes include having regard to the local context in which it is being provided
These systems and processes include having regard to the number of patients being provided it
These systems and processes include having regard to the nature of the particular kind of health care provision
12IA Duty to ensure appropriate staffing
RAG status
Item
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all NHS functions and professional groups to ensure that at all times suitably
qualified and competent individuals, from such a range of professional disciplines as necessary (see guidance for details of professional disciplines
included within the Act) are working in such numbers as are appropriate for the health, wellbeing and safety of patients; the provision of safe and high-
quality health care; and in so far as it affects either of those matters, the wellbeing of staff.
These systems and processes include having regard to the guiding principles when carrying out the duty imposed by section 12IA
Please provide information on how these systems and processes, and their application, have improved outcomes for service users
Please provide information on the steps taken to comply with section 12IA.
Comment
There is a clearly defined mechanism for monitoring compliance with this duty and escalation of non-compliance (when this cannot be adequately met)
These systems and processes include having regard to appropriate clinical advice
Processes are in place to provide assurance that appropriate staffing is in place and that guiding principles are taken into account when decisions relating to
staffing requirements are made.
Processes are in place to provide assurance that where risk exists that appropriate mitigation is in place.
Processes are in place to enable staff to comment on staffing levels and for staff to be informed of decisions relating to staffing.
Processes are in place to provide assurance that where a Health Board or Integration Authority are commissioning Health Services from another provider that the
provider complies with the general duty and principles of this Act and to record any challenges faced.
The PRAG tool has provided evidence of high risk areas that has allowed us to focus recruitemnt drives and also to support use of supplementary staffing due to
the risk. This has resulted in safer enviroments for our patients and staff
These systems and processes include having regard to the needs of patients being provided it

Page 9

9 
Areas of success, achievement or learning
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level of risk
(RAG)
This is the
residual level of
risk, taking into
account the
actions taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Local Real Time Staffing Assessment Tool developed
in line with national resources and completed at start
of each shift on a daily basis.
Trend data
Risk Register
PRAG reports
Action Plans
Clinical and Staff Governance Groups
Team Meetings 1:1 in place for all staff to provide
opportunity for feedback and discussion. Trend data, iMatter Surveys, Action Plans
Governance Groups
Minutes
Workload Tool reports
This should include details of the NHS function /
professional group etc. that the area of success,
achievement or learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning. For example,
application of eRostering has allowed senior personnel to be able to see staffing in real-time
across all areas, allowing staff to be reallocated as required to reduce level or risk.
This should describe how the success, achievement or learning could be used in the future.
Continue the roll out of eRostering across the organisation, using learning from areas that have
already implemented.
Workforce tools including PJ and workforce reviews
carried out annually which will take congnisance of
guiding principles and duties within the legislation.
Reporting Template developed in line with CSM.
Dashboards developed locally to provide current and trend workforce data.  Staff and Patient
Expeience Survey, Complaints, Imatter, Datix, EIC Dashboard
Reporting template developed in line with the Common Staffing Method to complete local
context/triangulation process for all worklaod tool results/outcomes. These will be presented via
Clinical and Staff Governance Groups. SG Progress Reports, Rosters, Workforce Plans, AOP.
orforce tools/PRAG by Senior Nurses/Service Managers and associated actions. Leadership walkrounds
Reasonable Assurance
Full engagement and completion of PRAG over 7
day period. Real Time Staffing Assessment tool. Post
mitigation risks must be completed at all times.
Details
This should include details of the NHS function /
professional group etc. that the area of escalation,
challenge or risk relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, there
may be difficulty with recruiting a particular staff speciality or in a remote / rural location. 
Attendance and engagement at Workforce
Governance Groups, Safety Huddles, Team
Meetings.Sharing  of information and feedback to
and from teams. Understanding and application of
Workload Tools Reportign/Review, PRAG Daily Safe
Staffing Assessment Tool
Limited staff engagement around staffing levels and associated decisions related to staffing
Area of escalation / challenge  / risk
Integrated working groups - no workload tools or real time staffing assessments in place
currently.  Poor data quality dependent on staff engagament in
prep/planning/housekeeping/training and data capture.
Specialty Specific Workload and Workforce Planning
Tools do not exist for some clincial areas, especially
those with integrated services - Scoping excercise to
be completed for these areas re PJ only Tool.
Availabilty of workforce is a national challenge
Tool is not completed or not completed accurately. Staff understanding of tool and how to use in practice
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried out this duty through
the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Action
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, if there is difficulty in recruiting in a particular speciality or remote / rural location,
the relevant organisation may have investigated retire and return schemes or upskilling and
career development for existing staff. It may also have looked at how the service could be
redesigned.
Apply local context where appropriate.  Develop worklaod tools nationally that are fit for purpose.
Oversight Group will monitor risks re preparedness and complaince with legislation.  Review
absence management processes and return to work support. Review of blueprints and funded
establishment using workload and workforce planning tool outcomes/triangulation and RTS
resources as evidence.
Encourage engagement and completion of Real Time Staffing Assessments daily especially post
mitigation. Review risk registers. Develop national annual risk assessment process for reporting.
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or any challenges or
risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
Area of success / achievement / learning Details Further action

Page 10

10 
Guidance chapter link
Section Status
12IC(1) Yellow
12IC(2)(a) Green
12IC(2)(b) Green
12IC(2)(c) Yellow
12IC(2)(d) Green
12IC(2)(e) Yellow
12IC(2)(f) Yellow
12IC(2)(g) Yellow
N/A Green
12IC Duty to have real-time staffing assessment in place
RAG status
Item
These systems and processes include means for encouraging and enabling all staff to use the systems and processes available for
identifying and notifying risk to the individual with lead professional responsibility.
These systems and processes include the means to provide training to relevant individuals with lead professional responsibility on
how to implement the arrangements in place to comply with this duty.
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, for the real-time assessment of compliance with the duty to ensure
appropriate staffing, in all NHS functions and professional groups.
These systems and processes include means for ensuring that individuals with lead professional responsibility receive adequate time
and resources to implement those systems and processes.
There is a clearly defined mechanism for monitoring compliance with this duty and escalation of non-compliance (when this cannot be
adequately met)
These systems and processes include the means for any member of staff to identify any risk caused by staffing levels to the health,
well-being and safety of patients; the provision of safe and high-quality health care; or, in so far it affects either of those matters, the
wellbeing of staff.
These systems and processes include the means for the initial notificaiton / reporting of that risk to the relevant individual with lead
professional responsibility.
These systems and processes include the means for mitigation of risk, so far as possible, by the relevant individual with lead
professional responsibility, and for that individual to seek, and have regard to, appropriate clinical advice as necessary.
These systems and processes include means for raising awareness among all staff of the methods for identifying risk, reporting to the
individual with lead professional responsibility , mitigation, and seeking and having regard to clinical advice.
Comment
PRAG tool is available but still issues with staff completion compliance
Mitigation of risk is taking place but not always recirded as well as could be
ongoing staff training with the tools
ongoing staff training with the tools
system pressures are impacting on lead nurses ability to monitor as closely as we would like and to keep records up to date 24/7
discussed at every nursing workforce meeting and compliance monitored. Areas for improvement identified

Page 11

11 
Areas of success, achievement or learning
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level
of risk
(RAG)
This is
the
residual
level of
risk,
taking
into
account
the
actions
taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Real Time SResources beign
carried out daily withn most clinical
settings. Allows for overview of
risks by
ward/team/division/locality/site etc.
Trend data, risk registers, patient/staff experience surveys, EIC quality measures. Action Plans                                      
Clinical and Staff Governance Groups
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
Area of success / achievement /
learning Details Further action
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of success,
achievement or learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning. For example,
areas that have implemented and are using SafeCare are finding it easy to be able to record risks
that are identified and the mitigation measures implemented and clinical advice received. Reports
extracted from the system are demonstrating an auditable trail of decision-making.
This should describe how the success, achievement or learning could be used in the future. This
success is being used to demonstrate to other areas the benefits of using SafeCare and
supporting its implementation.
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or
any challenges or risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, there
may be difficulty with encouraging and enabling certain professional groups to use the systems
and processes.
Data is not completed or updated on a daily basis, especially post mitigation.
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of escalation,
challenge or risk relates to.
Accurate and consistent
completion of PRAG Daily Safe
Staffing Assessment Tool currently
hosted on excel platform and PJ
used for metric to calculate staffing
levels in relation to patient
dependency.
Reasonable Assurance
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried out
this duty through the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Area of escalation / Challenge  /
Risk Details Action
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, if there is difficulty in engaging certain professional groups, what measures have
been put in place with regard to increasing this such as using professional networks, staff
representatives etc.
Review of risks an escalation plans enacted as appropriate.

Page 12

12 
Guidance chapter link
Section Status
12ID(1) Yellow
12ID(2)(a) Yellow
12ID(2)(b) Green
12ID(2)(c) Yellow
12ID(2)(d) Yellow
12ID(2)(e) Yellow
12ID(2)(f) Green
12ID(2)(g) Yellow
12ID(2)(h) Yellow
12ID(2)(i) Yellow
12ID(2)(j) Yellow
N/A Green
Areas of success, achievement or learning
There is a clearly defined mechanism for monitoring compliance with this duty and escalation of non-compliance (when this cannot
be adequately met)
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
These systems and processes include means for ensuring that individuals with lead professional responsibility and other senior
decision-makers receive adequate time and resources to implement the arrangements.
These systems and processes include the means to provide training to relevant individuals with lead professional responsibility and
other senior decision-makers on how to implement the arrangements in place to comply with this duty.
These systems and processes include means for raising awareness amongst all staff of the arrangements stated in (a) to (g) above.
12ID Duty to have risk escalation process in place
Item
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all NHS functions and professional groups, for the escalation of
any risk identified through the real-time staffing assessment processes which has not been possible to mitigate.
These systems and processes include the means for the lead with professional responsibility to report the risk to a more senior
decision-maker.
These systems and processes include the means for that senior decision-maker to seek, and have regard to, appropriate clinical
advice, as necessary, when reaching a decision on a risk, including on how to mitigate it.
These systems and processes include the means for the onward reporting of a risk to a more senior decision-maker in turn, and for
that decision-maker to seek, and have regard to, appropriate clinical advice as necessary, when reaching a decision on a risk,
including on how to mitigate it.
These systems and processes include means for this onward reporting in (c) to escalate further, as necessary, in order to reach a
final decision on a risk, including, as appropriate, reporting to members of the relevant organisation.
These systems and processes include means for notification of every decision made following the initial report, and the reasons for
that decision, to anyone involved in identifying the risk, attempting to mitigate the risk, escalation of the risk and providing clinical
advice.
These systems and processes include means for anyone involved in identifying the risk, attempting to mitigate the risk, escalation of
the risk and providing clinical advice to record any disagreement with any decision made following the initial identification of a risk.
These systems and processes include means for anyone involved in identifying the risk, attempting to mitigate the risk, escalation of
the risk and providing clinical advice to request a review of the final decision made on an identified risk (except where that decision is
made by members of the relevant organisation).
compliance monitored via PRAG
Comment
documentation of mitigating actions being impacted by system pressures
needs built into escalation SOP
Escalation SOP in development. Local agreement that any risks that cant be mitigated to Red to be escalated to associate nurse director and
any purple risks to be escalated to nurse director. Escalation is not happening consistently
as above
as above
as above

Page 13

13 
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level
of risk
(RAG)
This is
the
residual
level of
risk,
taking
into
account
the
actions
taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Risk Register, Action Plan, Workforce Plan, Legislation requirements
Development of board wide
NMAHP risk esclation
Process/SOP is currentlyunderway
Trend data - review of risks before and after mitigation Risk Register, Action Plan, Workforce Plan, Legislation requirements
Development of board wide
NMAHP risk esclation
Process/SOP is currentlyunderway
Risk Register, iMatter, Huddles, 1:1 meetings Workload Tool reports, Action Plan, Workforce Plan
Further action
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of success,
achievement or learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning. For example,
senior decision-makers in paediatric nursing were identified and chain of escalation
communicated to all personnel. Individuals are now much better aware of who to contact during
any particular shift in the event that a risk needs to be escalated.
This should describe how the success, achievement or learning could be used in the future. The
procedures for identifying the chain of escalation that were used in paediatric nursing are now be
trialled and rolled out across other areas.
Evidence of escalation details
facilitated within PRAG Daily Safe
Staffing Assessment Tool
Trend data, Risk Register, Action Plans Action Plans, workforce reports
Risk Register stil to be developed
incorporating details of further
mitigation/actions/feedback etc.
Awareness of mitigation and actions
Reasonable Assurance
Area of escalation / Challenge  /
Risk Details
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of escalation,
challenge or risk relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, there
may be difficulty with ensuring relevant individuals involved in reporting, mitigating, escalating or
giving clinical advice on a risk are notified of decisions made the reasons for them.
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or
any challenges or risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
Area of success / achievement /
learning Details
Development of board wide
NMAHP risk esclation
Process/SOP is currentlyunderway
Trend data - review of risks before and after mitigation
Briefings, Team Meetings, one to ones, Huddles
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried
out this duty through the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Action
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, if there is difficulty in notifying relevant individuals about decisions made and the
reasons for them, what measures have been put in place to ensure this happens, such as
providing training, increasing awareness and auditing to identify root causes.
Escalation plans enacted. Staff supported
Team Briefs, Workforce Governance Meetings, Escalation  plans
Action logs, briefing logs
Maintance of proportionate risk
escalation due to the impact of
COVID 19 and continued staffing
challenges nationally
Risks are not identified or managed. Availabillity of staff to mitigage risk
Development of board wide
NMAHP risk esclation
Process/SOP is currentlyunderway
Risks are not identified or managed. Availabillity of staff to mitigage risk
Risk Register stil to be developed
incorporating details of further
mitigation/actions/feedback etc.
Decision making around risk is not fully evidenced and understood

Page 14

14 
12IE Duty to have arrangements to address severe and recurrent risks
Guidance chapter link
Section Status
12IE(1)(a) Green
12IE(1)(b) Green
12IE(2)(a) Green
12IE(2)(b) Green
12IE(2)(c) Green
12IE(2)(d) Green
N/A GreenThere is a clearly defined mechanism for monitoring compliance with this duty and escalation of non-compliance (when this cannot
be adequately met)
These systems and processes include means for identification of actions to prevent the future materialisation of such risks, so far as
possible.
Item
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all NHS functions and professional groups, for the collation of
information relating to every risk escalated to such a level as the relevant organisation considers appropriate.
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all NHS functions and professional groups, to identify and
address risks that are considered severe and / or liable to materialise frequently.
These systems and processes include the means for recording risks that are considered severe and / or liable to materialise
frequently.
These systems and processes include the means for reporting of a risk considered severe and / or liable to materialise frequently, as
necessary, to a more senior decision-maker, including to members of the relevant organisation as appropriate
These systems and processes include means for mitigation of any risk considered severe and / or liable to materialise frequently, so
far as possible, along with a requirement to seek and have regard to appropriate clinical advice in carrying out such mitigation.
Comment

Page 15

15 
Areas of success, achievement or learning
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level
of risk
(RAG)
This is
the
residual
level of
risk,
taking
into
account
the
actions
taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Workforce Governance, Dashboard
Workforce Tool Run Reports, new
staffing models for services, role
development, escalation plans
Risk Registers Workforce Plans, Annual workforce reports
Further action
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of success,
achievement or learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning. For example, a
recurrent risk was identified in the capacity of one laboratory, leading to a delay in testing
samples and communicating sample results. Following investigation, the process for booking in
samples was streamlined and an admin coordinator was appointed. This has improved
performance and the lab is now meeting its targets.
This should describe how the success, achievement or learning could be used in the future. For
example, the organisation is now looking at whether the changes implemented in the one lab
could be applied to other labs, to improve performance across the division.
Safety Briefs and Workforce
meetings to review risks. Datix
reports reviewed at Unit
Governance Groups
Risk Register, Datix Reports, Unit  Workforce Reports  Workforce Governance Groups, Workforce Action Plans, Dashboard
Monitoring process of current risks and issues
Monitoring process of current risks and issues
Monitoring process, ongoing review of service
Staff engagement to complete
PRAG tool and complete datix for
recurring risks
Accurate completion of PRAG tool
and risk severity is not clearly
identified. Ongoing review of
metrics
Consitency of approach,
availability of staff, recruitment
challenges
Wider awareness of risk and escalation
Consitency of communication of risk and mitigation
Move to untested staffing models, accuracy of data/information
Substantial Assurance
Area of escalation / Challenge  /
Risk Details
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of escalation,
challenge or risk relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, collation
of data in a particular NHS function has identified a risk that materialises frequently, however
identification of actions to prevent future materialisation has not  improved the situation.
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or
any challenges or risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
Area of success / achievement /
learning Details
PRAG tool in place and reviewed.
Local meetings and Workforce
Governance to escalate risks
Trend Data, risk register, Datix an Workforce Reports
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried
out this duty through the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Action
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, if identification of actions to prevent a frequent risk has not improved the situation,
measures to address could have included establishing a working group to investigate and make
recommendations, observing practice in the area, interviewing staff, addressing the staff skills
mix, allocating additional assistance, redesigning the service etc.

Page 16

16 
12IF Duty to seek clinical advice on staffing
Guidance chapter link
Section Status
12IF(1) Green
12IF(2)(a)
(i) and (ii) Green
12IF(2)(a)
(iii) and
(iv)
Green
12IF(2)(b) Green
12IF(2)(c) Green
12IF(2)(d) Green
12IF(2)(e) Green
12IF(3) Green
N/A GreenThere is a clearly defined mechanism for monitoring compliance with this duty and escalation of non-compliance (when this cannot
be adequately met)
These systems and processes include the means to raise awareness among individuals with lead clinical professional responsibility
for a particular type of health care in how to implement the arrangements in this duty.
These systems and processes include means for ensuring that individuals with lead clinical professional responsibility for a particular
type of health care receive adequate time and resources to implement the arrangements.
These systems and processes include means for the relevant organisation to have regard to the reports received.
These systems and processes include the means for individuals with lead clinical professional responsibility for a particular type of
health care to report to the members of the relevant organisation on at least a quarterly basis about the extent to which they consider
the relevant organisation is complying with the duties in 12IA to 12IF and 12IH to 12IL.
These systems and processes include the means for individuals with lead clinical professional responsibility for a particular type of
health care to enable and encourage other employees to give views on the operation of section 12IF and to record those views in the 
reports to the members of the relevant organisation.
These systems and processes include the means whereby if a relevant organisation makes a decision which conflicts with clinical
advice received, any person who provided clinical advice on the matter is notified of the decision and the reasons for it and this
person is able to record any disagreement with the decision made.
Item
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all NHS functions and professional groups, to seek and have
regard to appropriate clinical advice in making decisions and putting in place arrangements relating to staffing under sections 12IA to
12IE and 12IH to 12IL and to record and explain decisions which conflict with that advice.
These systems and processes include the means whereby if a relevant organisation makes a decision which conflicts with clinical
advice received, any risks caused by that decision are identified and mitigated so far as possible. 
Comment

Page 17

17 
Areas of success, achievement or learning
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level
of risk
(RAG)
This is
the
residual
level of
risk,
taking
into
account
the
actions
taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Further action
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of success,
achievement or learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning. For example,
the views of employees included in the reports prepared by individuals with lead clinical
professional responsibility for a particular type of health care identified a potential improvement in
working practices in one area.
This should describe how the success, achievement or learning could be used in the future. For
example, the potential improvement is being trialled in the one area and if successful will be
rolled out across other areas in the organisation.
Testing of Guidance Chapter was
undertaken allowing for
understanding of this duty and
any gaps in process - swot
analysis completed and fedback
Substantial Assurance
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried
out this duty through the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Area of escalation / Challenge  /
Risk Details
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of escalation,
challenge or risk relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, in
compiling the reports made to the members of the Health Board, there is are good mechanisms in
place for the Medical Director to enable and encourage medical employees to give their views, but
the mechanisms for seeking the views of other professional groups for which they are
responsible, such as pharmacy employees, are not well established. Hence, the views of these
employees are not being sought or incorporated into the reports.
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or
any challenges or risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
Area of success / achievement /
learning Details
Action
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, if the views of all professional groups are not being sought, what measures have
been put in place to engage these groups and proactively seek out their opinions.

Page 18

18 
12IH Duty to ensure adequate time given to clinical leaders
Guidance chapter link
Section Status
12IH Yellow
12IH Yellow
12IH Green
12IH Green
12IH Green
12IH Yellow
N/A GreenThere is a clearly defined mechanism for monitoring compliance with this duty and escalation of non-compliance (when this cannot
be adequately met)
These systems and processes include the means to consider outputs from activities carried out to meet this duty in order to inform
future workforce planning and protect the leadership time required for clinical leaders.
Item
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all NHS functions and professional groups, to ensure that all
individuals with lead clinical professional responsibility for a team of staff receive sufficient time and resources to discharge that
responsibility and their other professional duties.
These systems and processes include the means to identify all roles, and therefore individuals, with lead clinical professional
responsibility for a team of staff.
These systems and processes include the means to determine what constitutes sufficient time and resources for any particular
individual.
These systems and processes include time and resources for these individuals to supervise the meeting of the clinical needs of
patients in their care; to manage, and support the development of, the staff for whom they are responsible; and to lead the delivery of
safe, high-quality and person-centred health care.
These systems and processes include the means for ensuring this duty has been reviewed and considered within the context of job
descriptions, job planning and work plans, as appropriate.
Comment
system pressures are impacting on capacity
system pressures have resulted in SCN/ TL having to work clinically during protected time
Evidence can be limited but work underway to strengthen via clinical supervision and care assurance

Page 19

19 
Areas of success, achievement or learning
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level
of risk
(RAG)
This is
the
residual
level of
risk,
taking
into
account
the
actions
taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Team Leaders have protected time 
for leadership Workforce reports  to identify trends.   imatter  Pyschological safety questionnaires. Workforce reports  Review compliance of management of LTSand RTW across HSCP
Progress of Assurance priorities   Staff feedback via imatter, Psychological safety
Team Leaders have protected time 
for leadership. Development
sessions for Team Leaders and for
teams 
Staff feedback Psycholgical safety reports    Staff engagement Progress of Assurance priorities   Staff feedback via imatter, Psychological safety
Development session for Team
Leaders. Clinical supervision  &
Assurance framework
Staff feedback Psycholgical safety reports    Staff engagement Progress of Assurance priorities   Staff feedback via imatter, Psychological safety
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried
out this duty through the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Reasonable Assurance
Area of escalation / Challenge  /
Risk Details
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of escalation,
challenge or risk relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, the
process in place to identify the roles, and therefore indivduals, with lead clinical professional
responsibility for a team of staff does not consistently identify who these individulas are, and
therefore sufficient time and resources for these individuals to discharge their responsibilities has
not been considered.
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or
any challenges or risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
Area of success / achievement /
learning Details
Team Leaders have protected time 
for leadership. Clinical Supervision
& Assurance work
Workforce reports. Ongoing assurance reports. Staff feedback
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of success,
achievement or learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning. For example,
senior physiotherapists and team leaders convened a working group to determine what sufficient
time and resources would look like for individuals with lead clinical professional responsibility for a
team of staff. The outcome of the project was a determination of time and resources for different
team leaders and feedback so far has been positive.
Action
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, if the process in place to identify the roles, and therefore individuals, does not
consistently identify who those indivduals are, what measures have been taken to address this,
e.g. working with all staff groups / clinical  areas / teams to identify job titles / roles, utilising HR
processes and data, utilising eRostering to identify team leaders etc.
Further action
This should describe how the success, achievement or learning could be used in the future. This
has now been extended to other AHP areas and trialled to see applicability.

Page 20

20 
12II Duty to ensure appropriate staffing: training of staff
Guidance chapter link
Section Status Comment
12II Green
12II Green
12II Green
12II Green
N/A Green
Item
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all NHS functions and professional groups, to ensure that all
employees receive such training as considered appropriate and relevant for the purposes set out in section 12IA(1)(a) and (b) and
such time and resources as considered adequate to undertake this training.
These systems and processes include means to determine the level of training required, and time and resource to support this, for all
relevant employees.
These systems and processes include the means to deliver the agreed level of training to all relevant employees.
These systems and processes include the means to ensure all relevant employees receive both time and resources to undertake the
training.
There is a clearly defined mechanism for monitoring compliance with this duty and escalation of non-compliance (when this cannot
be adequately met)

Page 21

21  
Areas of success, achievement or learning
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level
of risk
(RAG)
This is
the
residual
level of
risk,
taking
into
account
the
actions
taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Further action
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of success,
achievement or learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning. For example,
the psychology division, in conjuction with HR, has just completed a project to promote more
accurate capturing of information relating to continued professional development for psychology
colleagues. Feedback from employees is that they have found the new system much easier to
use and are now recording relevant CPD.
This should describe how the success, achievement or learning could be used in the future.  AHP
colleagues have now expressed interest in the new system and are undertaking a project to see if
they could implement something similar.
Protected time for
compulsory/mandatory training Learnpro Score card to review compliance of training. Pychological safety  results , I Matter Progress of Assurance priorities   Staff feedback via imatter, Psychological safety
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried
out this duty through the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Substantial Assurance
Area of escalation / Challenge  /
Risk Details
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
Area of success / achievement /
learning Details
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or
any challenges or risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
Action
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of escalation,
challenge or risk relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, clearly
defined processes and procedures exist for some groups of staff, e.g. nursing and midwifery, but
don't exist for other groups of staff, e.g. healthcare scientists.
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, if procedures and processes are not in place for healthcare scientists, what
measures need to be put in place to ensure this, such as working with HR and healthcare
scientist representatives to define an appropriate training programme, assess training needs of
employees and plan for required training to be undertaken.

Page 22

22 
12IJ Duty to follow the common staffing method
(*The relevant organisation must only report on the types of health care, location and employees as detailed in section 12IK)
Guidance chapter link
Section Status
12IJ(1) Yellow
12IJ(2)(a) Green
12IJ(2)(b) Yellow
12IJ(2)(c)(i) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(ii) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(iii) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(iv) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(v) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(vi) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(vii) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(viii) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(ix) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(x) Green
12IJ(2)(c)(xi) Green
12IJ(2)(d) Green
12IJ(2)(e) Green
N/A Green
These systems and processes include means to decide what changes (if any) are needed to the staffing establishment and the way in
which health care is provided as a result of following the common staffing method.
These systems and processes include taking into account appropriate clinical advice.
These systems and processes include taking into account any assessment by HIS, and any relevant assessment by any other person, of
the quality of health care provided.
These systems and processes include taking into account experience gained from using the real-time staffing and risk escalation
arrangements under 12IC, 12ID and 12IE.
These systems and processes include taking into account comments by patients and individuals who have a personal interest in their
health care, which relate to the duty imposed by section 12IA.
These systems and processes include taking into account comments by employees relating to the duty imposed by section 12IA.
These systems and processes include means to identify and take all reasonable steps to mitigate any risks.
There is a clearly defined mechanism for monitoring compliance with this duty and escalation of non-compliance (when this cannot be
adequately met)
These systems and processes include taking into account patient needs.
Item
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all the types of health care, locations and employees listed in section
12IK, to follow the common staffing method no less often than the frequency prescribed in Regulations.
These systems and processes include use of the relevant speciality specific staffing level tool and professional judgement tool as
prescribed in Regulations, and taking into account results from those tools.
These systems and processes include taking into account relevant measures for monitoring and improving the quality of health care which
are published as standards and outcomes under section 10H(1) of the 1978 Act by the Scottish Ministers (including any measures
developed as part of a national care assurance framework).
These systems and processes include taking into account current staffing levels and any vacancies
These systems and processes include taking into account the different skills and levels of experience of employees
These systems and processes include taking into account the role and professional duties of individuals with lead clinical professional
responsibility for the particular type of health care.
These systems and processes include taking into account the effect that decisions about staffing and the use of resources taken for the
particular type of health care may have on the provision of other types of health care (particularly those to which the common staffing
method does not apply).
These systems and processes include taking into account the local context in which health care is provided.
Comment
tools are being run as outlined but quality of completed tools is variable. As tools become more familiar it is hoped that accuracy of completion
will improve.
Care assurance work has commenced and ongoing.
utilise care opinion and patient complaints but no direct involvement

Page 23

23  
Areas of success, achievement or learning
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level
of risk
(RAG)
This is
the
residual
level of
risk,
taking
into
account
the
actions
taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Testing of Guidance Chapter was
undertaken allowing for understanding
of this duty and any gaps in process -
SWOT analysis completed and
fedback
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
Area of success / achievement /
learning Details Further action
This should include details of the NHS
function / professional group etc. that
the area of success, achievement or
learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning. For example,
application of the common staffing method in adult inpatient provision identified some areas
where the staffing establishment needed to be changed and some areas with potential for service
redesign. These changes are now in progression and will be trialled to monitor the outcomes.
This should describe how the success, achievement or learning could be used in the future. For
example, following completion of the trials regarding changes in staffing establishment and
service redesign, decisions will be taken as the changes made. These could then be used as
case studies to inform training for staff about the use of the common staffing method.
Area of escalation / Challenge  / Risk Details
This should include details of the NHS
function / professional group etc. that
the area of escalation, challenge or risk
relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, the
common staffing method was followed at the required frequency in all areas except emergency
care provision with an explanation of why this was not completed, e.g. lack of knowledge /
training of personnel.
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or any
challenges or risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried out this
duty through the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Reasonable Assurance
Action
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, if the common staffing method was not followed in emergency care provision and
this was due to lack of knowledge / training, what measures were put in place to address this,
e.g. identifying key personnel, provision of training, assistance from experienced personnel in
other areas etc.

Page 24

24 
12IL Training and consultation of staff
(*The Health Board and Agency must only report on the types of healthcare, location and employees as detailed in section 12IK)
Guidance chapter link
Section Status
12IL Green
12IL(a) Green
12IL(b) Green
12IL(c) Green
12IL(d) Green
12IL(e) Green
N/A Green
These systems and processes include providing information to employees engaged in the types of health care mentioned in section
12IK about its use of the common staffing method, including the results from the staffing level tool and professional judgement tool;
the steps taken under 12IJ(2)(b), (c) and (d) and the results of the decisions taken under 12IJ(2)(e).
These systems and processes include ensuring that employees who use the common staffing method receive adequate time to use
it.
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all the types of health care, locations and employees listed in
section 12IK, for the training and consultation of employees.
These systems and processes include means to encourage and support employees to give views on staffing arrangements for the
types of health care described in section 12IK.
These systems and processes include means for taking into account and using views received to identify best practice and areas for
improvement in relation to staffing arrangements.
These systems and processes include training employees (in particular those employees of a type mentioned in section 12IK) who
use the common staffing method on how to use it.
CommentItem
There is a clearly defined mechanism for monitoring compliance with this duty and escalation of non-compliance (when this cannot
be adequately met)

Page 25

25 
Areas of success, achievement or learning
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level
of risk
(RAG)
This is
the
residual
level of
risk,
taking
into
account
the
actions
taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried
out this duty through the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Substantial Assurance
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or
any challenges or risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
Action
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, arranging and delivering training, provision of mentoring from experienced
personnel, job planning to ensure adequate time is available for designated personnel to follow
the common staffing method.
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of escalation,
challenge or risk relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, issues
were identified with the lack of training and adequate time for personnel in emergency care
provision.
Area of escalation / Challenge  /
Risk Details
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
Area of success / achievement /
learning Details Further action
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of success,
achievement or learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning. For example,
key personnel who were very experienced in using the common staffing method were engaged to
train and mentor other personnel involved in the process.
This should describe how the success, achievement or learning could be used in the future. For
example, those key personnel have now decided to meet regularly in a forum to discuss shared
learning and to ensure the common staffing method is used consistently across all relevant areas
in the organisation.
Testing of Guidance Chapter was
undertaken allowing for
understanding of this duty and
any gaps in process - swot
analysis completed and fedback

Page 26

26 
1 Guiding principles for health and care staffing
2 Guiding principles etc. in health and care staffing and planning
Guidance chapter link
Section Status
2(2)
These are steps taken to comply with 2(2) in general. Examples could include information about procurement and commissioning processes, how the guiding principles are taking into account and what procedures are in place for obtaining information about staffing arrangements.
This should include, but not be limited to data in relation to patient safety and quality of care measures and outcomes, patient feedback and adverse event reporting.
RAG status
Item
Clearly defined systems and processes are in place, and utilised, in all NHS functions and professional groups to ensure that when
the Health Board is planning or securing the provision of health care from another person, it has regard to the guiding principles for
health and care staffing and the need for that person from whom the provision is being secured to have appropriate staffing
arrangements in place.
Please provide information on the steps taken to comply with section 2(2)
Please provide information on how these systems and processes, and their application, have improved outcomes for service users
Comment
work is underway to ensure that as part of any externally commissioned service we have safe staffing embedded as part of the
quality assurance and monitoring framework.

Page 27

27 
Areas of success, achievement or learning
Areas of escalation, challenges or risks
Level
of risk
(RAG)
This is
the
residual
level of
risk,
taking
into
account
the
actions
taken.
Level of Assurance: Please indicate level of assurance provided
Declaration: The relevant organisation has systems and processes in place to meet the requirements of this duty, and has carried
out this duty through the presence and use of appropriate systems and processes as detailed above.
Please provide details of areas of escalation where the relevant organisation has been unable to achieve or maintain compliance or
any challenges or risks associated with carrying out the requirements, and the actions in place to address these.
Action
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, engaging with service providers to ensure they understand what information is
required, seeking alternative service providers etc.
Limited assurance
Area of escalation / Challenge  /
Risk Details
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of escalation,
challenge or risk relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the challenge or risk identified? For example, there
may have been difficulties in planning or securing services from in a particular speciality in
relation to having regard to the need for that service to have appropriate staffing arrangements in
place.
Please provide details of areas of success, achievement or learning associated with carrying out the requirements.
Area of success / achievement /
learning Details Further action
This should include details of the
NHS function / professional group
etc. that the area of success,
achievement or learning relates to.
This should describe the situation: what is the success, achievement or learning.
This should describe what actions have been / are being / will be taken to address the situation.
For example, if there is difficulty in recruiting in a particular speciality or remote / rural location,
the relevant organisation may have investigated retire and return schemes or upskilling and
career development for existing staff. It may also have looked at how the service could be
redesigned.