Democracy Spraffa

Home to School Transport Provision 2022-23

North Lanarkshire Council · 29 September 2022
Back to Policy and Strategy Committee — 29 September 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1 
North Lanarkshire Council
Report
Policy & Strategy Committee 
Does this report require to be approved? ☐ Yes   ☒ No
Ref:  GMcL Date 29/09/22 
Home to School Transport Provision 2022/23 
From  Gerard McLaughlin, Head of Education (North)  
E-mail mclaughling@northlan.gov.uk Telephone 01236 812269 
Executive Summary 
On 16 August 2022 Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT) contacted North
Lanarkshire Council to advise that they had failed in their contractual obligation to arrange
transport for over 1600 children and young people due to attend our schools the next day. 
The failure affected over 40 individual contract routes and came despite previous
communication from SPT, as late as 08 August 2022, indicating that over 99% of all
contracts were in place.  This position confirmed by information available to us at that time
via SPT’s shared management information system (Axiom). 
In response to SPT’s failure to plan, deliver and communicate, Education and Families set
up a Transport Emergency Group under the Corporate Resilience Framework to design
and implement a plan of complex and far-reaching actions designed to mitigate a series of
significant consequences and impacts. 
As of 25 August 2002, all children and young people affected now have a transport offering
in place.  We continue to work to improve temporary arrangements on an ongoing basis. 
Recommendations
It is recommended that the Policy & Strategy Committee: 
(1) Endorse the contents of this report.
(2) Endorse the internal review and joint review with SPT, noting that elected members
will receive reports on the outcome of these reviews. 
The Plan for North Lanarkshire
Priority  Support all children and young people to realise their full potential
Ambition statement (7) Enhance collaborative working to maximise support and ensure
all our children and young people are included, supported, and safe

Page 2

2 
1.  Background 
1.1  North Lanarkshire Council provide free school transport to over 8000 children and
young people.  Almost all is provided by external contractors using agreed procurement
practice.  The provision of free school transport is one of the largest non-staffing costs
within Education and Families budget. Section 51 of the Education (Scotland) Act
1980 requires local authorities to make such arrangements as they consider necessary
for the provision of school transport for pupils attending schools in their area. Local
authorities have a wide level of discretion in this regard, but arrangements will take
account of factors such as safe walking distance, pupil safety, placing requests, vacant
seats, medical conditions, and additional support needs.
1.2  Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT) is the Regional Transport Partnership for
the West of Scotland. SPT was formed in 2006 as part of the transport framework
created by the Scottish Government, which is made up of a national transport agency,
Transport Scotland, and seven Regional Transport Partnerships.
1.3 The SPT remit comprises of the following council areas: East Dunbartonshire, East
Ayrshire, East Renfrewshire, Glasgow City, Inverclyde, North Ayrshire, North
Lanarkshire, Renfrewshire, South Ayrshire, South Lanarkshire, West Dunbartonshire
and the Helensburgh and Lomond area of Argyll and Bute.
1.4 SPT’s role involves planning and delivering transport solutions for all modes of
transport across the region, in conjunction with member councils and industry partners. 
In respect of our school transport the key role undertaken by SPT is in the procurement
and management of mainstream home to school bus contracts. 
1.5 SPT and Council obligations are outlined within an agency agreement.  This is
reviewed every three years and was last reviewed in 2020.  
1.6 A process of providing exceptional payments to contractors during Covid was
implemented during lockdown.   
2. Report 
Standard Arrangements for Mainstream Home to School Transport 
2.1 The following describes the agreed process for ensuring transport of pupils to school: 
• Pupils entitled to transport are added to SPT supplied Axiom database
• This database and associated systems within SPT calculate route/runs            
required over several years based on pupil data
• SPT tender these contracts on our behalf subject to our final approval
• SPT tendering takes place from June through to August
• SPT inform parents/carers of allocated contractors
• SPT manage and ensure MOT, Insurance and PVG other compliance.
(Current NLC policy stipulates six monthly MOT checks and a maximum vehicle
age of 20 years).
• SPT manage ongoing contract compliance. 
There is a contractual obligation that should any issues arise at any stage of these
processes, SPT should inform us through usual regular contact to allow proper risk
management and implementation of mitigations where required.

Page 3

3 
Incident
2.2 What transpired on Tuesday 16 August can be best described as a systemic market
failure that affected several local authorities, but with greater impact on the North
Lanarkshire area. Subsequent to the catastrophic event, immediate contingency
planning and activity took place to mitigate the impact on families. 
2.3 The first confirmation of any issue was received by SPT on the morning of 16 August,
advising that 25 bus contracts were unfulfilled. This escalated to 45 contracts –
affecting more than 1600 pupils – by the afternoon of 16 August. 
2.4 Prior to this there had been no forewarning of the scale of the potential impact beyond
routine levels.  By way of example, communication between SPT and Education and
Families officers on 08/08/22 pointed to 99% of all contracts (approximately 250 in
total) being awarded at that time.  Later communication indicated 13 contracts would
be withdrawn and re-awarded on a temporary basis but not withdrawn completely
Impacts 
2.5 Routes and Pupils Affected 
Date Routes Pupil Numbers
Wednesday 17/08 46 1648
Thursday 18/08 32 1317
Friday 19/08 31 1314
Monday 22/08 10 115
Tuesday 23/08 4 60
Wednesday 24/08 1* 45
Thursday 25/08 1* 45
Friday 26/08 0 0
*not identified by SPT 
2.7 In parallel, there were several knock-on consequences to the failure of SPT to deliver
this number of contracts. These included greater difficulty in arranging ASN transport
as there was less capacity to access the supply of providers of transport. The service
prioritised fulfilling ASN contracts and has now resolved all ASN contracts. 
Financial Impacts 
2.8 SPT Annual Cost/Budget Projections 
2.8.1 At the start of each financial year SPT provide authorities with an estimate of the
financial cost for each home to school contract they have administered on our behalf. 
The estimate for financial year 2022/23 is attached. This represents circa 240
individual contracts (home to school runs) at a total value of £7.639m. 
2.8.2 Pre-Covid, SPT would re-tender a percentage (normally 1/3) of contracts each year on
a rolling programme so that the annual estimate would include a number of previously
agreed contracts which were still running, and newly tendered contracts.
2.8.3 However, due to the impact of Covid all of our SPT contracts had to be re-tendered as
at August 2022. In the intervening period contracts which had elapsed had been ‘rolled
forward’ to ensure service security and continuity. This was because it was impossible
to renegotiate these arrangements during the pandemic response.

Page 4

4 
(This ‘roll forward’ approach was similarly adopted during Covid in respect of ASN taxi
contracts which are administered internally, and which have also had to be re-tendered
as a single tranche as at August 2022).
2.8.4 In terms of the roll forward of contracts, SPT had full visibility of this and, in line with
the contracted role, our view is that they should have prepared accordingly.  No
challenge or concern was raised at any prior stage.  Officers in South Lanarkshire
Council advise of the same position in that area. 
Financial Impact on Waste and Fleet Service
2.9 The contingency measures put in place have also resulted in several existing ASN
fleet drivers being reassigned to mainstream provision. This in turn resulted in
professional drivers from the Council’s Waste service being transferred into the ASN
provision to ensure continuity of service provision at the expense of recyclate
collections within Waste.
2.91 The above measure has resulted in additional costs to the Council immediately and in
the future:
• Agency drivers now being hired to backfill the ASN provision to allow all waste
drivers to be transferred back to allow the reintroduction of all Waste Services.
• Increased overtime through driver familiarisation and the introduction and
coordination of the new mainstream routes.
• Increased staffing at the recycling centres to provide additional capacity for
paper/card disposal and collection during the cessation of the kerbside collection.
2.92 The suspension of the Council’s paper/card collection has had significant negative
publicity including both national news coverage and considerable social media
comments
Authority Payments to SPT 
2.10 Payments are made by authorities to SPT via an agency agreement.
2.10.1 There are fixed dates each financial when a payment is made. The scheduled payment
dates/values for the 2022/23 financial year are highlighted in the table below: 
Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total
Month 5 May 2022 4 Aug 2022 3 Nov 2022 2 Feb 2023 N/A
Value £1.909m £1.909m £1.909m £1.909m £7.639m 
2.10.2 These scheduled payments are based on the annual estimate previously provided by
SPT.  In addition, there is an annual review/reconciliation process whereby SPT
assess the actual costs incurred by authorities during the year compared to the original
estimate and will thereafter issue a rebate or further request for payment. 
2.10.3 Typically the Service has received a rebate as part of the reconciliation process. For
example, during financial year 2021/22 the original SPT estimate was £6.755m, in
comparison to the actual full year payment of £6.551m.

Page 5

5 
2.10.4 The scheduled payment to SPT for 2022/23 is aggregated as follows: 
SPT Forecast Costs 2022/23  £m
Fixed School Contracts 7.328
Use of Temporary Contracts 0.125
Agency Fee 0.185
Advertising 0.001
Total 7.639 
Contractual position
2.10.5 Given the extent of the failure by SPT, it is incumbent upon us to review contractual
arrangements.  On 16 August 2022, SPT advised us that those 38 contracts due to
run the next day could not be fulfilled. 
2.10.6 As a broad indicator the estimated full year cost of these 38 contracts for 2022/23 was
originally estimated by SPT as £0.962m.
2.10.7 Appropriate action under the terms of the contract is being considered by Legal and
Democratic Solutions.
Anticipated Transport Overspend
2.11 The Service was previously anticipating a combined mainstream and ASN transport
overspend of more than £2m during 2022/23.
2.11.1 It is highly likely that the necessary contingency arrangements we have adopted and
approved to mitigate this failure will result in additional unfunded cost pressures.
Officers will continue to track justifiable internal and external additional costs the
Council has incurred with a view to seeking appropriate recompense from SPT.
Reputational Impacts 
2.12 Despite full acceptance of responsibility and a full public apology by SPT, the damage
to our reputation as a result of this failure is potentially significant.  The failure by SPT
to provide transport has been covered widely on social and mainstream media.   
2.12.1 The council’s communication team has worked closely with Education and Families to 
keep parents/carers and the wider public aware of ongoing developments.
Considerable resource has been allocated to creating and updating a dedicated web
page that provides a central, credible source of information with the most up to date
advice for parents/carers, generating almost 100,000 views over the eight days it has
been live. To direct people to this page, a total number of 92,837 messages via SMS
text or email have been sent over the same period directly to parents/carers of the
schools affected. This activity was supported by social media content (400,000
impressions, 3,000 shares, 3,000 comments and 4,000 link clicks on Facebook and
126,000 impressions, 120 retweets, 116 replies and 3,000 link clicks on Twitter) to
ensure those people most affected had access to the latest information.

Page 6

6 
Mitigating Factors 
2.13 SPT advised that the principal reasons for contract failure are: 
• A lack of qualified drivers in the general workforce
• Fewer contractors available in the Lanarkshire area
• A significantly larger number of contracts requiring renewal 
2.13.1 Furthermore, it should be noted that we apply an enhanced statutory transportation
policy to pupils in the area. This is more generous than most local authorities. 
Area Primary Pupils (miles) Secondary Pupils (miles)
Statutory Minimum 2 3
North Lanarkshire 1 2 
Review of events 
2.14 SPT, in its own report (Appendix 1), has committed both to its own internal review and
a joint review with the council. The council will participate fully in this review and, in
addition, will carry out an internal review. The outcome of both these reviews will be
reported to elected members. 
2.15 At this early stage, the reviews will have to consider specific mitigations that could be
deployed to counteract market volatility. In general, these can be categorised as being
about reducing our transport demand or improving our levels of supply. They include: 
• Whether the enhanced provision beyond statutory distance is sustainable in real
terms
• Whether the council can supplement private provision through sourcing of vehicles
and drivers
• Whether the current council policy in respect of MOT is sustainable
• Whether an expansion of parental expenses scheme (currently offered to ASN)
could mitigate demand
• Whether more use if service buses would help to increase supply in a safe and
sustainable manner
These and other potential mitigations will be fully explored as part of the review and
reported to elected members. 
3. Measures of success 
N/A

Page 7

7 
4. Supporting documentation 
4.1 Appendix 1 – SPT Committee Report “Home to School Transport” – 26 August 202 
Gerard McLaughlin 
Head of Education (North)

Page 8

8 
Impacts ( http://connect/report-template-guidance ) 
5.1 Public Sector Equality Duty and Fairer Scotland Duty
Does the report contain information that has an impact as a result of the Public
Sector Equality Duty and/or Fairer Scotland Duty?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
If Yes, has an assessment been carried out and published on the council’s website?
https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/your-community/equalities/equality-and-fairer-
scotland-duty-impact-assessments
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.2 Financial impact
Does the report contain any financial impacts?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, have all relevant financial impacts have been discussed and agreed with
Financial Solutions?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
Impacts considered within the report at 2.8 and 2.9.  It is highly likely there will be a
significant uplift in costs from financial year 2021/22.  This was initially estimated at
around 20% due to known market forces.  However, the very late award of
commercial contracts by SPT, including contingency arrangements such as bus
lease, and the resultant lack of available competition will likely increase this further. 
5.3 HR policy impact 
Does the report contain any HR policy or procedure impacts?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, have all relevant HR impacts have been discussed and agreed with People
and Organisational Development?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
A key contingency in addressing the lack of contract awards by SPT has been the
use of 10 leased coaches.  SPT advised that drivers could not be provided.  This
meant the re-allocation of some of our existing refuse vehicle drivers on a temporary
basis.  Also, the re-allocation of some of our Learning Assistants to provide escort
duties on certain routes. 
5.4 Legal impact
Does the report contain any legal impacts (such as general legal matters, statutory
considerations (including employment law considerations), or new legislation)?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, have all relevant legal impacts have been discussed and agreed with Legal
and Democratic Solutions?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
Impacts considered within the report.  This includes an analysis of the current
agreement with SPT and potential default position.  Work has also been carried out
to ensure contingency arrangements around the 10 lease coaches are fully
compliant and subject to formal agreement including areas such as insurance,

Page 9

9 
maintenance, servicing, MOT, cleaning, accident reporting, operator’s licence and
large bus permits. 
5.5 Data protection impact 
Does the report / project / practice contain or involve the processing of personal
data?  
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, is the processing of this personal data likely to result in a high risk to the data
subject?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, has a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) been carried out and e-
mailed to dataprotection@northlan.gov.uk 
Yes ☐ No ☐ 
5.6 Technology / Digital impact
Does the report contain information that has an impact on either technology, digital
transformation, service redesign / business change processes, data management, or
connectivity / broadband / Wi-Fi?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
Where the impact identifies a requirement for technology, has an assessment been
carried out (or scheduled) by the Enterprise Architecture Governance Group
(EAGG)? 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.7 Environmental / Carbon impact
Does the report / project / practice contain information that has an impact on any
environmental or carbon matters?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact?
5.8 Communications impact
Does the report contain any information that has an impact on the council’s
communications activities?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
Impacts considered in report.  The relates to a considerable volume of public and
individual information which has been updated regularly as issues emerge.  In
addition, there has been regular contact with local and national press.  Education
and Families is managing a considerable rise in volume of queries around school
transport including those from elected members.
5.9 Risk impact
Is there a risk impact?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the key risks and potential impacts,
highlighting where the risk(s) are assessed and recorded (e.g. Corporate or Service
or Project Risk Registers), and how they are managed? 
Key risks emerging from SPT’s failure to award contracts in time have been
identified.  These include financial, legislative, and reputational.  These are being
managed via risk capture process.

Page 10

Operations 26 August 2022 - Mainstream Home to School Transport - Update Page 1 of 5
Mainstream Home to School Transport - Update
Committee Operations  
Date of meeting 26 August 2022 Date of report 25 August 2022
Report by Chief Executive
1. Object of report
To update the Committee in relation to Mainstream Home to School Transport. Members
are advised this report does not relate to Additional Support Needs (ASN) school
transport.
2. Background
Under agency agreements with 11 councils in the west of Scotland, SPT manages,
monitors and maintains provision of Mainstream Home to School Transport (HST). This
is achieved through the procurement of contracted services from commercial bus & coach
operators, taxi and minibus providers. This combination of operators is required as the
complexity of school travel takes account of distance travelled, location of pupils to
specific schools, and number of children to be collected on specific routes.
To that end, SPT typically has approximately 1,200 contracts in place, ensuring nearly
36,000 primary and secondary children get to school and home again, completing around
72,000 journeys per day. In 2021/22 the total budget for HST was circa £27 million. In
2022/23 the total budget for HST increased to £35 million.
The performance of operators in providing services in fulfilment of these school contracts
is actively monitored by our team of compliance inspectors, whose role it is to ensure that
the vehicles and service provided meet the safety requirements, contract specification
and quality criteria stipulated by each council.
Normally, around 300 to 400 HST contracts are renewed annually on a rolling basis,
covering all of the 11 council areas. However, given restrictions in place during the Covid
19 pandemic, and following government procurement guidance, SPT on behalf of our
councils put in place over 369 temporary one-year contracts in 2020/21 and 760 in
2021/22 in order to maintain HST operations given the uncertainties faced.
Resultingly, ahead of the 2022/23 school term, and in line with our standard procedures,
SPT advertised more than 900 contract renewals (to provide HST for over 36,000 pupils),
on a phased basis during the period from January to June 2022, with contract terms
ranging from one to five years in duration. As members will be aware, the need to tender
such services is a legal procurement requirement.
Details on the Invitation to Tender (ITT) dates & contract volumes by council are detailed
in Appendix 1 for reference. In total 852 contracts were recommended for award ahead
Agenda Item 6
Appendix 1 - SPT Committee Report “Home to School Transport”
– 26 August 2022

Page 11

Operations 26 August 2022 - Mainstream Home to School Transport - Update Page 2 of 5   
of the school term, with temporary contract offers received for the remainder. However,
a substantial number of contracts were subsequently declined by commercial operators,
in the days before schools returned, in particular 46 contracts were declined at short
notice for North Lanarkshire Council (NLC) schools, and a further 16 for South
Lanarkshire Council (SLC) schools, respectively. Operators cited lack of driver
availability, fuel price volatility and wider inflationary pressures amongst reasons for
declining contracts, many doing so only in the days before the school term commenced. 
3. Update 
Significant work by SPT’s school transport team goes into contract specification,
tendering, driver clearance through the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (PVG) scheme,
contract award, and service monitoring. All contract specifications are approved by
individual councils. Details on current contracts, number of pupils carried and outcomes
of service monitoring is reported in the “Monitoring report on public transport services &
facilities in the SPT area”, which forms a separate report to this Committee. 
The provision of school transport is timebound in that contracts must be in place for the
start of each school term, specifically the August return after the summer holidays. As
could be expected, preparatory work in advance of the August term is particularly intense
but, in preparing for the start of the 2022-23 school year, officers were mindful that the
circumstances in which contracts were being specified and tendered was unprecedented
for a range of reasons. 
From previous reports, members will be aware that the current commercial bus market in
the west of Scotland is struggling to attain a sustainable position for future operation due
to a significant decline in patronage; current figures show that bus patronage in the SPT
area is around 70-75% of pre-Covid pandemic levels. The impact of this is compounded
by the fact that, again due to the impact of the pandemic, operators have encountered
issues in regard to the recruitment and retention of staff, specifically drivers, many of
whom have chosen to pursue an alternative career path after the pandemic. It is worth
highlighting that, in seeking to address this issue, SPT took the positive step of hosting a
bus driver recruitment event at Buchanan Bus Station in January 2022, in partnership
with affected operators. 
Further, members are advised that commercial operators of registered services received
Covid support during and up to Autumn 2022, when it is due to end. This funding has
played a fundamental role in sustaining the registered bus network, albeit at a reduced
level than pre-Covid. In relation to school transport Covid support, it is worth highlighting
that, following discussion with SPT, operators were paid a proportion of their contract
costs by councils during the pandemic without having to provide a service, in order to
sustain the market during that time. The proportion of the contract cost paid by councils
varied across the region, ranging from 25%-75%.   
This unprecedented, ongoing and emerging scenario has created a ‘perfect storm’ for
organisations such as SPT in seeking to ensure the provision of socially necessary bus
services and contracts for school transport. The financial strain of passenger decline, staff
issues, and future uncertainty created by the impending loss of Network Support Grants
(NSG) has made operators wary and risk averse in formally committing to any new work
– and this is not an issue unique to the West of Scotland. The coach operators and taxi
providers who make up a sizeable proportion of school transport provision in some areas
could be said to have faced even more challenging times than bus operators during the
pandemic, given their core markets (e.g. events and tourism) all but collapsed at that
time.

Page 12

Operations 26 August 2022 - Mainstream Home to School Transport - Update Page 3 of 5   
However, as schools returned in the week ending 19 August, bus provision had been
secured to ensure that around 95% of pupils across the 11 council areas were taken to
and from school for the start of their term. Regrettably, however, as the week progressed,
and despite SPT having secured school transport for over 80% of North Lanarkshire
Council (NLC) pupils, it became clear that an issue was emerging in being able to secure
sufficient HST for around 1,600 NLC pupils (and over 300 SLC pupils), as the operators
to be awarded the relevant contracts had, at short notice, withdrawn their offers to fulfil
them. 
Given the emerging situation, SPT officers met with NLC and SLC initially on Monday 15
August to inform them of this, followed up by detailed emails on Tuesday 16 August. SPT
fully acknowledges the late communication of this in the emerging situation and
subsequently issued a public apology, recognising the disruption that this causes for
many, with a commitment to continue to seek to the address the issue as soon as
possible. 
In this context, it is necessary to highlight that each council determines elements of their
own HST specification which operators are required to respond to. In the case of NLC,
this includes additional operator requirements including mandatory six-monthly MOT’s
and a maximum vehicle age limit of no more than 20 years old. These conditions were
introduced by NLC following a serious school bus crash in 2017. Whilst these additional
conditions are understandable, this represents a further challenge in securing both local
contractors and those from further afield at short notice that is unique to North
Lanarkshire. 
In seeking to address the issue quickly, SPT mobilised a business recovery team focused
on securing emergency coverage of HST in North & South Lanarkshire, working in
partnership with the respective councils. The team were initially tasked with contacting
operators of all sizes across Strathclyde, the rest of Scotland, north of England and
Northern Ireland to ascertain if they could assist in the supply of buses, coaches,
minibuses and taxis, inclusive of suitably qualified drivers. While some additional
resources were identified and secured, it became apparent that given the scale of the
driver shortage, particularly PCV qualified bus drivers, that the commercial market alone
were unlikely to be able to meet the outstanding mainstream HST requirements in North
& South Lanarkshire, at least not in the short term. 
Given the above, and following further discussions with the respective councils, it was
agreed as an emergency measure that council internal fleets and qualified drivers would
be deployed to cover any unfulfilled contracts on a temporary basis as the team continued
to secure commercial cover. During this period a small number of instances of operators
accepting and then not fulfilling contracts also occurred, making communication of
information to parents particularly challenging. Due to the scale of the issue in North
Lanarkshire specifically, SPT entered into discussion with a local coach operator about
the opportunity to access a fleet of large coaches, although they were unable to provide
additional drivers. This resulted in SPT, with council agreement, procuring the lease of
10 high capacity coaches from Parks of Hamilton to supplement the council’s internal
minibus fleet. Suitably qualified bus drivers were identified within NLC and a small number
in SPT to facilitate operations. To maximise the effectiveness of this resource, SPT also
undertook the complex task of planning a “double run” scenario to ensure as many
children had access to transport as possible. 
Through the efforts of staff at SPT, NLC, SLC and bus operators, an interim solution
covering the vast majority of affected pupils was secured by Monday 22 August. This
interim solution will provide SPT and council officers with suitable time to identify a longer-
term solution over coming weeks. SPT officers continue to engage with NLC, SLC and
operators on a daily basis in continuing to monitor the situation closely, and stand ready

Page 13

Operations 26 August 2022 - Mainstream Home to School Transport - Update Page 4 of 5   
to address any further issues identified. SPT officers have been in regular contact with
Scottish Government officials from both Transport Scotland and the Education
Directorate to update on progress. 
Since the commencement of the above interim solution on Monday 22 August, SPT has
managed to secure 49 contracts with commercial operators totalling 38 contracts in North
Lanarkshire and 11 in South Lanarkshire. SPT officers continue to work closely with our
partners in North and South Lanarkshire to secure further cover in this regard, where
possible. 
In addition to the above, to address concerns and assist in communicating the interim
solution to those affected, a dedicated helpline was setup by SPT specifically for
Lanarkshire parents and guardians. The helpline commenced operation on Friday 19
August at 07:30hrs, staffed by the SPT Schools team, and remains in operation at the
time of writing. More than 600 calls were received over the first six days of operation. 
4. Conclusions 
Mainstream Home to School transport provision is essential in supporting and facilitating
the education of children across Strathclyde. SPT has successfully managed, monitored
and maintained provision of mainstream Home to School Transport on behalf of 11 of our
partner councils for many years. However, it is clear that the normal challenges SPT faces
in terms of securing HST have been exacerbated to an extent by the Covid 19 pandemic,
market fragility, recent fuel price rises and the ongoing acute shortage of bus drivers
being witnessed across the country. Despite this backdrop, it is factual that SPT secured
transport for more than 95% of pupils across the 11 council areas ahead of the 2022/23
school term commencing. 
However, notwithstanding the above, SPT also recognises that it was wholly
unacceptable for our partners in North and South Lanarkshire to be informed of the
inability to meet their requirements at such short order ahead of the new school year
commencing, due primarily to operators withdrawing their contract offers due to the
reasons noted above. SPT was therefore quick to apologise to those pupils, parents &
guardians affected, and took immediate steps to address the problem swiftly and
efficiently within a very uncertain environment. 
Looking ahead, a comprehensive internal review has been initialised to identify lessons
learned from the issue, including links with NLC and SLC, as we continue to work with
the 11 councils to identify sustainable HST solutions moving forward. In addition, in
discussion with the Chief Executive of NLC it has been agreed to order a joint review into
how we ensure longer term stability of this service provision. It is intended that this will be
completed before the end of the calendar year. 
5. Conclusions 
The Committee is recommended to note this report. 
6. Consequences
Policy consequences Delivery of school transport is in line with the RTS.
Legal consequences None directly.
Financial consequences The overall school budget for 2022/23 across all
Councils is £35.055m which represents an increase of
£2.722m (8%) compared to the 2021/22 budget.  The

Page 14

Operations 26 August 2022 - Mainstream Home to School Transport - Update Page 5 of 5   
2022/23 projected outturn for each Council will
confirmed on the finalisation of all contract awards.
Personnel consequences To continue to deliver effective services staff from within
the wider Bus Strategy & Delivery functions may need
to undertake additional duties to assist the Schools
Agency Services function. This will be continually
reviewed and monitored
Equalities consequences Ongoing monitoring of equalities impacts of school
transport.
Risk consequences    
Climate Change, Adaptation &
Carbon consequences
The fragility of the Home to School Transport market
remains an ongoing risk to delivering services
effectively and efficiently. 
School transport has a positive benefit through reducing
the need for journeys by less sustainable modes. 
Name Neil Wylie  Name Valerie Davidson
Title Director of Finance &
Corporate Support 
Title Chief Executive
For further information, please contact Gordon Dickson, Head of Bus Strategy and Delivery at 0141
333 3407 or Bruce Kiloh, Head of Policy and Planning on 0141 333 3740.