Democracy Spraffa

Appendix A - Planning Performance Framework - 22-23 Feedback Report - Argyll and Bute - RAG Assessment

Argyll and Bute Council · 20 December 2023
Back to Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee — 20 December 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Scottish Ministers, special advisers and the Permanent Secretary are covered by
the terms of the Lobbying (Scotland) Act 2016.  See www.lobbying.scot
St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh  EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot

 
Minister for Local Government Empowerment and
Planning  
Ministear airson Cumhachdachadh is Dealbhachadh
Riaghaltas Ionadail
Joe FitzPatrick MSP 
Joe Mac Giolla Phádraig BPA
T: 0300 244 4000
E: scottish.ministers@gov.scot

Pippa Milne
Chief Executive
Argyll and Bute Council
___
20 October 2023
Dear Pippa Milne,
I am pleased to enclose feedback on your authority’s twelfth Planning Performance Framework
(PPF) Report, for the period April 2022 to March 2023.
Across the country, performance against the key markers continues to be stable and there has
been little variation in the overall total of green, amber and red markings awarded this reporting
period compared with previous periods. It is clear that each of you continue to put in considerable
effort to ensuring our planning system continues to run efficiently. I have been particularly pleased
to see there has been a marked improvement on speed of determination for major applications
across some authorities.
Resourcing remains a key priority which I will continue to discuss with the High Level Group on
Planning Performance, which I jointly chair with COSLA. I also have asked officials to bring
different parties together to talk about resourcing in the autumn, to identify practical solutions. We
need options that work for all sectors, and I think it would be really beneficial to discuss a variety of
issues including full cost recovery, the local setting of fees, charges for additional services and
approaches which could enable authorities to access the skills and expertise at the time they
require.
Finally, I am delighted that we have recently announced the appointment of the National Planning
Improvement Champion (NPIC), Craig McLaren, who took up this new post in early September.
Craig will play a pivotal role in supporting improvement and will also be looking at how we can
improve the way we measure and assess the performance of the planning system in the future.  
If you would like to discuss any of the markings awarded below, please contact us at 
chief.planner@gov.scot and a member of the team will be happy to discuss them with you.
Appendix A

Page 2

Scottish Ministers, special advisers and the Permanent Secretary are
covered by the terms of the Lobbying (Scotland) Act 2016.  See
www.lobbying.scot 
St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh  EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot

 

JOE FITZPATRICK 
CC: Fergus Murray, Head of Economic Development and Strategic Transportation

Page 3


PERFORMANCE MARKERS REPORT 2022-23
Name of planning authority: Argyll & Bute Council 
The High Level Group on Performance agreed a set of performance markers. We have assessed your report against
those markers to give an indication of priority areas for improvement action. The high level group will monitor and
evaluate how the key markers have been reported and the value which they have added. 
The Red, Amber, Green ratings are based on the evidence provided within the PPF reports. Where no information or
insufficient evidence has been provided, a ‘red’ marking has been allocated. 
No. Performance Marker RAG
rating
Comments
1 Decision-making: continuous
reduction of average timescales for
all development categories [Q1 -
Q4] 
Red Major Applications
Your average timescale is 43.1 weeks which is slower than
the previous year and slower than the Scottish average of
39.5 weeks.
RAG = Red 
Local (Non-Householder) Applications
Your average timecale is 16.3 weeks which is slower than the
previous year and slower than the Scottish average of 14.4
weeks.
RAG = Red 
Householder Applications
Your average timescale is 12.7 weeks which is slower than
the previous year and slower the Scottish average of 8.9
weeks.
RAG = Red 
Overall RAG = Red
2 Processing agreements:
• offer to all prospective
applicants for major
development planning
applications; and
• availability publicised on
website
Green You note that you offer processing agreements for all major
developments however this was not taken up by any
prospective applicant.
RAG = Green 
You provide information on processing agreements on your
website and you also highlight this as an option in all your
pre-application reports.
RAG = Green 
Overall RAG = Green
3 Early collaboration with applicants
and consultees
• availability and promotion
of pre-application
discussions for all
prospective applications;
and
• clear and proportionate
requests for supporting
information
Green You continue to offer a pre-application service and are
looking to undertake a review of the service to help provide
follow up advice in 2023/24.
RAG = Green 
Your pre-application service provides advice to applicants on
the supporting information required in advance of a formal
application process. 
RAG = Green 
Overall RAG = Green
4 Legal agreements: conclude (or
reconsider) applications after
resolving to grant permission
reducing number of live
applications more than 6 months
after resolution to grant (from last
reporting period)
Red Your average timescale for determining applications with
legal agreement is 49.5 weeks which is slower than the
previous year and slower than the Scottish average of 41.1
weeks. 
It is noted that you have a process in place to flag up
undertermined applications subject to legal agreements
however due to staff resources the availability to undertake
this activity has reduced.

Page 4


Enforcement charter updated / re-
published within last 2 years
Green Your enforcement charter was reviewed and updated in
March 2022 which is within the last 2 years.
6 Continuous improvement:
• progress ambitious and
relevant service
improvement commitments
identified through PPF
report
Green You have completed 2 out of 12 service improvement
commitments with a further 7 progressing. You have noted
that 2 commitments were put on hold, one due to awaiting
Scottish Government review of permitted development rights
and the other commitment revised for the 2023/24 reporting
period. 
You have identified a good range of service commitments for
the coming year, with 8 carried over from the previous year
and 4 new actions identified.
7 Local development plan less than
5 years since adoption
Red Your LDP was 8 years old at the end of the reporting period
which is more than 5 years since adoption.
8 Development plan scheme 
– next LDP:
• project planned and
expected to be delivered to
planned timescale
Green Your next LDP is currently at examination and is expected to
be adopted in the coming year. This is in line with your most
recent development plan scheme adopted in March 2022.
9 &
10 LDP Engagement:
• stakeholders including
Elected Members, industry,
agencies, the public and
Scottish Government are
engaged appropriately
through all key stages of
development plan
preparation.
N/A Your next LDP is currently at examination stage and
therefore no engagement has been carried out during the
reporting period.
11 Policy Advice 
• Production of relevant and
up to date policy advice
Green You continue to produce up to date policy including updated
guidance on both S64 submissions and Local Place Plans.
You have also clearly signposted to applicants where to
access all relevant policy advice on your website.
12 Corporate working across
services to improve outputs and
services for customer benefit (for
example: protocols; joined-up
services; single contact
arrangements; joint pre-application
advice)
Green You have highlighted a range of joint up services including
the merging of housing with development policy and having
the planning service and roads and infrastructure team sit
under one executive director. It is also noted that you have
set up an internal working group to tackle key housing issues,
which includes bringing senior officers from across various
council services together.
13 Sharing good practice, skills and
knowledge between authorities 
Green You have provided a good example of how you’ve shared
good practice in relation to aquaculture applications by
providing assistance to collegues in other authorities. You
also take up the role as Chair in the Local Authority
Aquaculture-working group.
14 Stalled sites / legacy cases:
conclusion or withdrawal of old
planning applications and reducing
number of live applications more
than one year old
Red You have cleared 18 cases during the reporting period. The
number of cases remaining have nearly doubled from 65 last
year to 125 this year.
15 Developer contributions: 
clear and proportionate
expectations
• set out in development plan
(and/or emerging plan);
and
• in pre-application
discussions
Green It is noted that expectations for developer contributions are
set out in the current LDP which is supported by
supplementary guidance. You have also highlighted that the
upcoming LDP has a proposed policy relating to an updated
approach on developer contributions.
RAG = Green 
You note that developer contributions requirements are
highlighted during the pre-application stage and provide
justification to the prospective applicant on reasoning for the
requirement.
RAG = Green
Overall RAG = Green

Page 5


ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL 
Performance against Key Markers 
Marker 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23
1 Decision making
timescales          
2 Processing
agreements          
3 Early collaboration           
4 Legal agreements          
5 Enforcement charter          
6 Continuous
improvement           
7 Local development
plan          
8 Development plan
scheme          
9 &
10
LDP Early
Engagement N/A N/A N/A   N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
11 Regular and
proportionate advice
to support
applications 
12 Corporate working
across services          
13 Sharing good
practice, skills and
knowledge       
14 Stalled sites/legacy
cases          
15 Developer
contributions           
Overall Markings (total numbers for red, amber and green)    
2013-14  0 5 8
2014-15 0 2 11
2015-16 0 3 10
2016-17 1 3 11
2017-18 1 3 11
2018-19 0 3 10
2019-20 0 3 10
2020-21 3 2 8
2021-22 1 4 7
2022-23 4 0 10 
Decision Making Timescales (weeks) 
13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23
2022-23
Scottish
Average
Major
Development 59.1 14.1 23.3 22.1 37.9 28.3 33.9 40.4 40.8 43.1 39.5
Local 
(Non-
Householder)
Development
13.1 10.8 10.3 12.4 12.6 10.8
10.2 12.5 13.6
16.3 14.4
Householder
Development 7.2 6.9 7.0 7.5 7.9 7.1 7.2 9.1 10.3 12.7 8.9