Democracy Spraffa

Planning Adviser Background Report

North Lanarkshire Council · 9 August 2022
Back to Local Review Body — 9 August 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

North Lanarkshire Council
Report
Local Review Body 
Does this report require to be approved? ☒ Yes   ☐ No
Ref 21/00805/FUL Date 09/08/22 
Planning Application 21/00805/FUL Planning Adviser Background
Report 
From  Pamela Humphries, Head of Planning and Regeneration  
E-mail WatsonMA@northlan.gov.uk Telephone Mary Ann Watson,
07581009079 
Executive Summary
This background report summarises the key considerations for review by the members of
the Local Review Body in determining the appellants appeal against the delegated refusal
of their application. 
Recommendations
That the members of the Local Review Body note the content of this background report.  
The Plan for North Lanarkshire
Priority  Improve the health and wellbeing of our communities
Ambition statement (14) Ensure the highest standards of public protection

Page 2

1. Background 
1.1 Planning Application 21/00805/FUL for a new dwellinghouse at Land West of Quarry
Cottage, Longrggend Road, Longriggend, Airdrie was refused planning permission
under delegated powers on the 8th February 2022. 
1.2 A notice of review was submitted by the appellant dated 3rd May 2022 
2. Description of Proposal and Location 
2.1 Description of proposal: New dwellinghouse 
Location: Land West of Quarry Cottage, Longrggend Road, Longriggend, Airdrie
2.2 The site is an area of land approximately 575sqm which consists of a mixture of
hardstanding, grass and planting located on Longriggend Road. It is directly
surrounded by fields to the north, south, east and west and has an existing caravan
located on the site. 
2.3 Site Context 
Google Aerial View 1

Page 3

Google Aerial View 2 
2.4 Plans   
Location Plan

Page 4

Proposed Plans, Elevations, Sections and 3D Perspectives 
Road Visibility Splay

Page 5

2.5 Site Photographs 
Site Viewed from Longriggend Road Looking South West 
Site Viewed from Longriggend Road Looking East

Page 6

Site looking East 
Site looking North East

Page 7

Site looking North 
Site Looking West

Page 8

Site Panorama 
2.6 Planning Policy 
North Lanarkshire Local Development Plan
Local Plan Extract 
2.7 The Scottish Government confirmed on 5 July 2022 that the Scottish Ministers do not
propose to issue a direction in respect of the adoption the North Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan and that the Council can proceed to Adopt. Accordingly, the Plan
has now been Adopted by the Council and became operative on 6 July 2022. Whilst it
remains possible that there may be a legal challenge to adoption from objectors to the
Plan, it is unlikely that any such challenge would relate to matters directly relevant to
this application.
2.8  The application raises no strategic issues in terms of the Clydeplan Strategic
Development Plan 2017, and, therefore, can be assessed in terms of the North
Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2022.
2.9 The relevant Policies in the North Lanarkshire Local Development Plan and associated
Guidance are detailed can be summarised as follows:
Countryside PP 5 Policy Purpose of Place                                                         
Countryside AD 5 Policy Amount of Development                                                
Environmental and Design Qualities EDQ 3 Policy Quality of Development                   
SPG 08 (Assessing Development in the Rural Investment Area)

Page 9

A copy of these policies in full are located the agenda papers annex. 
2.10 The Report of Handling considered that the development was contrary to policy NBE
3B (Rural Investment Area) and associated Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG
08) of the North Lanarkshire Local Plan as it would constitute inappropriate
development in the Rural Investment Area that does not fulfil the requirements of
enhancing an existing development cluster. No adequate justification, special
circumstances or material considerations were considered to have been demonstrated
to merit a departure from the development plan in this instance. 
2.11 Reasons for Refusal 
1. The proposal is contrary to policy NBE 3B (Rural Investment Area) and associated
Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG 08) of the North Lanarkshire Local Plan
as it constitutes inappropriate development in the Rural Investment Area in that it
does not fulfil the requirements of enhancing an existing development cluster. No
adequate justification, special circumstances or material considerations have been
demonstrated to merit a departure from the development plan.
2.12 The report of handling recommended that the proposal should be refused for the
reasons outlined in both the Reasoned Justification and in the Reasons for Refusal
contained within the agenda papers annex. 
2.13 The application was refused planning permission on 8th February 2022. 
2.14 Consultations 
2.15 NLC Roads Development Service: No objection subject to comments on the access
visibility splay and parking provision. 
2.16 NLC Pollution Control: No objection subject to provision of comprehensive site
investigation and remediation works if necessary. 
2.17 The Coal Authority: No objection. 
2.18 Representations 
2.19 There were no representations received in relation to the application.  
2.20 Review Submission 
2.21 The applicant has submitted a Review Statement and supporting documents contained
in full within the agenda papers annex. The statement expresses, in summary, the
applicant’s view that:- 
- The decision was weighted to only one negative aspect of the decision criteria.
- Several positive compliance of local design guidance and assessment criteria
were dismissed.
- The form massing and general design of the building is in keeping with its
general surroundings.
- The reinstatement of a dwelling on the lot will not prejudice the purpose, open
character and visual amenity of the rural investment area.
- No objections from either the public or third party consultees.
- There was previously a property located on the site and the proposals reinstate
a building that was functionally obsolete.

Page 10

- The proposed dwelling is set within the context of the original historic dwelling
and will enhance the wider landscape setting and site features.
- The proposal improves the external appearance of the remaining derelict
structure and contributes to the visual amenity of the rural investment area.
- The proposed dwelling is accommodated within the existing footprint of the
historic dwellings.
- No request for supplementary evidence of the existing structure were requested
and no site visit was undertaken. Existing foundations and underbuilding of the
existing buildings are clearly visible when on site.
- The existing miners cottages that were demolished were not in a cluster pattern
and had a linear form, therefore reinstating a cluster would be creating
something that was never there to begin with.
- The proposal of a single detached small scale cottage style dwelling would be
consistent with the existing pattern of individual cottage style buildings along this
street and outwith the urban area of Longriggend. 
2.22 Representations subsequent to notification of interested parties of the notice of
Review 
2.23 No further representations have been submitted in response to the submission of the
Notice of Review. 
2.24 Conclusion and Decision on Proceeding with the Local Review Body Decision 
2.25 The appellant has requested that further written submissions on specific matters in
relation to further written and photographic submissions that they consider are required
to answer issues raised by the planning officer when no opportunity was available to
do so. 
2.26 As with all applications each case requires to be considered on its own merits and in
accordance with the development plan policies unless material considerations
outweigh the provisions of these policies. These are the factors and issues which
require to be considered by the Local Review Body when determining this application. 
2.27 The members are now requested to consider whether sufficient information is
provided within this LRB Report and the associated annex to proceed with the
hearing. 
3. Measures of success 
3.1  That the information provided is sufficient for the Local Review Body to determine the
appellants review submission.   
4. Supporting documentation 
4.1 The Planning Adviser Background Report will be accompanied by additional supporting
information contained within the background papers and includes:- 
- Planning Decision Notice.
- Report of Handling
- Planning Policy Documents
- Consultation Response
- Notice of Review and Supporting Documentation.

Page 11

4.2 North Lanarkshire Local Development Plan Policy Extracts

Page 12

Pamela Humphries
Head of Planning and Regeneration

Page 13

5. Impacts ( http://connect/report-template-guidance ) 
5.1 Public Sector Equality Duty and Fairer Scotland Duty
Does the report contain information that has an impact as a result of the Public
Sector Equality Duty and/or Fairer Scotland Duty?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
If Yes, has an assessment been carried out and published on the council’s website?
https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/your-community/equalities/equality-and-fairer-
scotland-duty-impact-assessments
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.2 Financial impact
Does the report contain any financial impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant financial impacts have been discussed and agreed with
Financial Solutions?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.3 HR policy impact 
Does the report contain any HR policy or procedure impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant HR impacts have been discussed and agreed with People
and Organisational Development?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.4 Legal impact
Does the report contain any legal impacts (such as general legal matters, statutory
considerations (including employment law considerations), or new legislation)?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant legal impacts have been discussed and agreed with Legal
and Democratic Solutions?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.5 Data protection impact 
Does the report / project / practice contain or involve the processing of personal
data?  
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, is the processing of this personal data likely to result in a high risk to the data
subject?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, has a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) been carried out and e-
mailed to dataprotection@northlan.gov.uk 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.6 Technology / Digital impact
Does the report contain information that has an impact on either technology, digital
transformation, service redesign / business change processes, data management, or
connectivity / broadband / Wi-Fi?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact?

Page 14

Where the impact identifies a requirement for technology, has an assessment been
carried out (or scheduled) by the Enterprise Architecture Governance Group
(EAGG)? 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.7 Environmental / Carbon impact
Does the report / project / practice contain information that has an impact on any
environmental or carbon matters?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.8 Communications impact
Does the report contain any information that has an impact on the council’s
communications activities?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.9 Risk impact
Is there a risk impact?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the key risks and potential impacts,
highlighting where the risk(s) are assessed and recorded (e.g. Corporate or Service
or Project Risk Registers), and how they are managed?