Democracy Spraffa

Strategic Performance Framework - latest performance results for Business and Digital

North Lanarkshire Council · 1 March 2023
Back to Finance and Resources Committee — 1 March 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

North Lanarkshire Council
Report
Finance and Resources Committee 
Does this report require to be approved? ☒ Yes   ☐ No
Ref  KH/SL Date 01/03/23 
Strategic Performance Framework - latest performance results for
Business and Digital 
From  Katrina Hassell Chief Officer (Business and Digital)  
E-mail HassellK@northlan.gov.uk Telephone 07903 096 121 
Executive Summary
Business and Digital comprises two areas of activity that work corporately across the
council:
• Technology Strategy Solutions, who are responsible for the live delivery and
operational management of technology solutions required to support services and
schools in delivering front line day to day operations and in progressing activities which
facilitate delivery of the council’s strategic place-based ambition.  A key aspect of this
area of activity is also the development of the technology estate, its solutions, and
integrations with third party suppliers.
• Business Strategy, who are responsible for driving business change, improvement,
and service redesign in order to provide efficient and effective services in line with the
council’s, and the North Lanarkshire Partnership’s, strategic aims and plans.  This area
of activity also includes measuring success against The Plan for North Lanarkshire
and ensuring the established frameworks and supporting governance remains relevant
and up to date. 
Business and Digital maintains a range of performance indicators which are monitored in
various ways, including subject matter specific monthly review meetings as well as
quarterly business management meeting discussions.  These meetings make use of the
evidence base provided by the performance results to inform discussions around the best
use of resources and decide priorities in this respect, as well as to highlight areas requiring
improvement.  The service’s four weekly risk management meetings also consider the
impact of performance achieved within critical areas of the service. 
For strategic overview and scrutiny purposes, this report provides Members of the Finance
and Resources Committee with an update of the latest results for the suite of performance
indicators used by Business and Digital to inform service delivery and underpin operational
decisions.
Recommendations 
It is recommended that the Finance and Resources Committee: 
(1) Review the high-level performance overview presented in Appendix 1, and the
supporting data contained within the linked Excel spreadsheet, and identify where
further information is required to understand or investigate performance further.

Page 2

1. Background 
1.1 There are six inter-related strategic frameworks which are key to assessing the success
of The Plan for North Lanarkshire and monitoring delivery towards achieving the overall
vision by ensuring each stage is appropriately planned, guided, implemented, and
governed.   
1.2 The six frameworks focus on ensuring a corporate one council approach in respect of
Policy, Governance, Performance, Self-Evaluation, Project Management, and
Demonstrating Improved Outcomes for Communities.   
1.3 The Strategic Performance Framework comprises
performance measurement at three levels (as per the
diagram on the right).  This aims to collectively provide an
overview of performance to help understand the impact of
council activities on improving services and outcomes for the
people and communities of North Lanarkshire.  The
measures in this Framework allow for day to day activities,
and progress towards achieving the long-term vision set out
in The Plan for North Lanarkshire, to be regularly monitored,
reported, assessed, and scrutinised.   
1.4 The Strategic Performance Framework is aligned to the Accounts Commission 
statutory direction which places a requirement on councils to report a range of
information in terms of (1) improving local services and outcomes, and (2)
demonstrating Best Value.  Key points of note in this respect are that the Accounts
Commission also expect to see: 
(a) A balance in reporting areas of improvement that have been achieved and not
achieved.
(b) Reporting that is undertaken in a timely manner.
(c) Easy access to performance information for all citizens and communities. 
1.5 A Performance Reporting Schedule supports the timely submission of a range of
performance information that facilitates Elected Members and senior management to
undertake regular performance reviews that inform scrutiny, challenge, and decision
making processes.  This Schedule, endorsed by the Audit and Scrutiny Panel in
February 2023, includes Chief Officer’s individual six monthly Performance Reviews at
Service Committees in line with the Strategic Performance Framework. 
1.6 This report therefore presents the Finance and Resources with the latest performance
results for Business and Digital for Members’ further review and scrutiny. 
2. Strategic Performance Framework 
Finance and Resources Committee responsibilities 
2.1 In line with the terms of reference outlined in the Scheme of Administration, the Finance
The Plan for North Lanarkshire
Priority  All priorities
Ambition statement All ambition statements

Page 3

and Resources Committee is responsible for monitoring and reviewing performance
information for the following Ambition Statements from The Plan for North Lanarkshire: 
18.  Ensure our digital transformation is responsive to all people’s needs and
enables access to the services they need.
24.  Review and design services around people, communities, and shared
resources.
25.  Ensure intelligent use of data and information to support fully evidence based
decision making and future planning. 
2.2 The high-level performance overview in Appendix 1 presents Members with a summary
of the latest results for each performance indicator within the remit of the Chief Officer
(Business and Digital). 
2.3 The information in Appendix 1 comprises the following: 
• An ideal direction arrow - this indicates whether a higher or lower figure is the
preferred direction of travel.   
• Measurement unit - for example whether the result is a %, a number, a unit cost
(in £), or a ratio.
• Performance results for the last four financial years (depending on availability of
data) along with the latest year’s target and corresponding RAG status (for
indicators where it is appropriate to set targets).   
• The most recent monthly or quarterly results, along with the corresponding target
and RAG status.  Note the inclusion of this information is dependent on the
measurement frequency of the indicator and availability of data as at the time of
reporting. 
• A trend graph - this captures the direction of travel achieved over the four financial
years and includes the most recent monthly or quarterly results where available.
• Comments - narrative summarising the current position and providing an
explanation for any significant variations in performance.  Where applicable, this
narrative also highlights the effect of the pandemic on service delivery, e.g. any
increase or decrease in the volume of transactions or enquiries processed. 
2.4 A large volume of data supports the high-level performance overview in Appendix 1. 
This is outlined in the latest performance results for Business and Digital Excel
spreadsheet which is available through the following link for Members to carry out a
deep dive and review and scrutinise each performance indicator further.  The Menu on
the second tab of the spreadsheet contains built in hyperlinks that automatically take
the user to a tab for each performance indicator and therefore provides a useful
navigation aid to review the contents of the file.
• Latest performance results for Business and Digital.xlsx 
Current context 
2.5 The service’s operating environment has changed significantly in recent years and, as
such, the performance information presented in Appendix 1 should be considered
within the context of the following:
 A higher figure is better
 A lower figure is better
Key to RAG status 
Performance is on target and/or within acceptable thresholds 
Performance does not meet target and is outwith acceptable thresholds 
Performance surpasses the target and exceeds expectations

Page 4

• The extent to which the service has supported the council in terms of responding
to and recovering from the pandemic over the last two years, while resuming
business as usual activities at pace.
• The changing structure required following approval to insource those services
previously outsourced to Wipro (supplier of the ICT service delivery contract), the
alignment of service provision following the insourcing of culture, sport, and leisure
services (previously delivered through Culture and Leisure NL Limited), and the
final steps in the integration of the schools’ technician’s service.
• Service specific advancements in terms of the procurement of the Connectivity
project in December 2021.
• The end of the contract with Agilisys in April 2022 and the ensuing significantly
reduced resource available going into 2022/23. 
• The direction set for the service in the DigitalNL - Year 4 Roadmap report submitted
to the Policy and Strategy Committee in September 2022 and the follow up
DigitalNL - Next Steps report approved in December 2022.
• The development of the Business and Digital Integrated Programme Plan which
aims to capture all areas of activity across the service and serve as a guide to
support resource planning and operational delivery, as well as the relevant project
management and governance controls. 
Recent performance highlights 
2.6 An area of performance which continues to improve on the target (as shown in
Appendix 1) is the number of  occasions in a month that a priority service (P1) has not
been available to users.  This continues to show a year on year decrease with 2021/22
and 2022/23 figures to date reflecting a range of targeted work which includes
increasing IT infrastructure resiliency, the initial move to home working having a greater
but more specific focus on the infrastructure delivering remote working, insourcing of
the Wipro service which has led to more accurate recording of P1 incidents, and the
removal of legacy systems and many legacy features which restrict the council’s further
adoption of cloud.   
Areas of performance requiring improvement 
2.7 An area of activity being kept under review is that in relation to service desk incidents
resolved within target.  Following the insourcing of Wipro, this indicator was changed
to capture all severity level 3 tickets regardless of who resolves them in order to provide
a more complete and accurate picture of all incidents that require to be resourced by
the service.  This has increased the volume of incidents recorded within this indicator
and additional information is being analysed monthly in terms of which teams tickets
are assigned to, how long tickets remain open, and any recurring issues in this respect.   
This analytical approach needs to be balanced against the ability to prioritise workloads
across the whole service, as opposed to the previous contractually driven model.  This
allows for a more agile and responsive approach to be taken, balancing development,
maintenance, and operational activities.  The decision was taken to maintain existing
baseline Service Levels Agreement targets; however it is expected these will be
adjusted moving forward once a clear picture is available. 
Managing this workload is also undertaken in tandem with infrastructure developments
across the service which, although improvements in the longer term, can often result in
an initial backlog of issues which require to be resolved in order to ensure a successful
transition to a new approach (e.g. the removal of the extra sign on step when using
AnyConnect for remote working).  This complete analysis is building up a picture to

Page 5

help understand demand and thereby allocate resources accordingly and set a realistic
target moving forward; a further update in this respect will be provided in the next six
monthly performance report to Committee. 
2.8 The complaints handling ratio is also currently under review to ensure that the council
continues to be proactive in responding to all routine complaints at the frontline at stage
1 (in line with the national local authority model Complaints Handling Procedure). 
Historical figures in this respect show that the council has consistently responded to 9
out of 10 complaints received at stage 1.  The implementation of the new Dynamics
complaints system, combined with a significant increase in the volume of complaints
received, has impacted on the figures shown for 2021/22 and further analysis is
currently underway to identify the root cause and the actions that need to be
implemented to improve this ratio moving forward. 
Next steps 
2.9 As noted in paragraph 1.5, the Strategic Performance Framework is supported by a
Performance Reporting Schedule.  This sets out the arrangements for service,
statutory, and Strategic Performance Framework reporting to committee.  In this
respect the relevant Committee can expect to receive the following in respect of
Business and Digital areas of work during 2023/24. 
Report Description Committee Committee
cycle
Senior
Information
Risk Owner
(SIRO)
annual
report 
This report provides an update relating to the
responsibilities of North Lanarkshire
Council’s Senior Information Risk Owner
(SIRO) and outlines activity and performance
related to information governance.  It
provides assurances that information risks
are being effectively managed, what is going
well, and where improvements can be made. 
It complements the data protection annual
report by the council’s Data Protection Officer
(DPO).
Audit and
Scrutiny
Panel
Cycle 1 in
2023
North
Lanarkshire
Community
Planning
Partnership
- annual
report 
The Community Empowerment (Scotland)
Act 2015 introduced a range of new
requirements on local authorities and
community planning partners to empower
and strengthen community involvement in the
design, planning, and delivery of local
services. The statutory duty of community
planning requires all public sector agencies
to work collaboratively in agreeing both
strategic and local priorities for their areas to
improve outcomes and address poverty and
inequalities. Community Planning
Partnerships must also annually review and
report on their progress.
Communities
Committee
Cycle 1 in
2023 
3. Measures of success 
3.1  Measures of success include:
• Regular oversight and monitoring of performance across the organisation to gain
assurances in terms of governance and accountability.
• Regular review and challenge processes to scrutinise the performance of the

Page 6

council to ensure effective use of resources and that resources are directed in
accordance with agreed policy and according to priorities, while ensuring sound
decision making and clear accountability for the use of resources in achieving
improved outcomes for service users and the local community.  
• Performance monitoring, management, and reporting arrangements that support
the demonstration of improved performance in local services and outcomes, and
the delivery of Best Value. 
4. Supporting documentation 
4.1 Appendix 1 -  High-level performance overview 
Chief Officer (Business and Digital) 
5. Impacts 
5.1 Public Sector Equality Duty and Fairer Scotland Duty 
Does the report contain information that has an impact as a result of the Public
Sector Equality Duty and/or Fairer Scotland Duty? 
Yes ☐ No ☒ 
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact?   
If Yes, has an assessment been carried out and published on the council’s
website? https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/your-community/equalities/equality-
and-fairer-scotland-duty-impact-assessments 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.2 Financial impact 
Does the report contain any financial impacts? 
Yes ☐ No ☒ 
If Yes, have all relevant financial impacts have been discussed and agreed with
Finance? 
Yes ☐ No ☐ 
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.3 HR policy impact 
Does the report contain any HR policy or procedure impacts? 
Yes ☐ No ☒ 
If Yes, have all relevant HR impacts have been discussed and agreed with People
Resources? 
Yes ☐ No ☐ 
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.4 Legal impact 
Does the report contain any legal impacts (such as general legal matters, statutory
considerations (including employment law considerations), or new legislation)? 
Yes ☐ No ☒ 
If Yes, have all relevant legal impacts have been discussed and agreed with Legal
and Democratic? 
Yes ☐ No ☐

Page 7

If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.5 Data protection impact 
Does the report / project / practice contain or involve the processing of personal
data?   
Yes ☐ No ☒ 
If Yes, is the processing of this personal data likely to result in a high risk to the
data subject? 
Yes ☐ No ☐ 
If Yes, has a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) been carried out and e-
mailed to dataprotection@northlan.gov.uk 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.6 Technology / Digital impact 
Does the report contain information that has an impact on either technology, digital
transformation, service redesign / business change processes, data management,
or connectivity / broadband / Wi-Fi? 
Yes ☒ No ☐ 
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact?
Improvements in the presentation of performance information to various audiences
is being advanced further in line with the development of the DigitalNL work
package for the Business Intelligence Hub. 
Where the impact identifies a requirement for significant technology change, has
an assessment been carried out (or is scheduled to be carried out) by the
Enterprise Architecture Governance Group (EAGG)? 
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.7 Environmental / Carbon impact 
Does the report / project / practice contain information that has an impact on any
environmental or carbon matters? 
Yes ☐ No ☒ 
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.8 Communications impact 
Does the report contain any information that has an impact on the council’s
communications activities? 
Yes ☐ No ☒ 
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.9 Risk impact 
Is there a risk impact? 
Yes ☒ No ☐ 
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the key risks and potential impacts,
highlighting where the risk(s) are assessed and recorded (e.g. Corporate or
Service or Project Risk Registers), and how they are managed?
The implementation of the Strategic Performance Framework, and Member’s
scrutiny of individual services therein, contributes towards the mitigation of the risks
on the Corporate Risk Register for Governance, Leadership, and Decision Making
and Managing Strategic Change.
5.10 Armed Forces Covenant Duty 
Does the report require to take due regard of the Armed Forces Covenant Duty (i.e.
does it relate to healthcare, housing, or education services for in-Service or ex-
Service personnel, or their families, or widow(er)s)? 
Yes ☐ No ☒

Page 8

If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the provision which has been made to
ensure there has been appropriate consideration of the particular needs of the
Armed Forces community to make sure that they do not face disadvantage
compared to other citizens in the provision of public services.

Page 9

Appendix 1
Business and Digital
High-level performance overview - as at January 2023

Page 10

No embedded text on this page.