Democracy Spraffa

Amendment to the Procedure for Considering Petitions

North Lanarkshire Council · 9 June 2022
Back to Council — 9 June 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

North Lanarkshire Council
Report
Council 
Does this report require to be approved? ☒ Yes   ☐ No
Ref  Date 09/06/22 
Amendment to the Procedure for Considering Petitions 
From  Head of Legal and Democratic Solutions  
E-mail rosean@northlan.gov.uk Telephone 07951 409714 
1. Background 
1.1 At its meeting held on 6 December 2018, the former Policy and Resources Committee
agreed a procedure to be followed upon a petition being received by the Council. 
1.2 A copy of the agreed report from the meeting of the former Policy and Resources
committee held on 6 December 2018 is attached as an appendix. 
2. Report 
2.1 Following the local government elections held on 5 May 2022 the new Council
Administration indicated its desire to create a Petitions Sub-Committee which would be
responsible for dealing with any petitions received by the Council. 
2.2 The creation of a Petitions Sub-Committee is dealt with separately at the meeting of
the Council held on 9 June 2022. There is a requirement for approval to be given for
the required changes to the current process to facilitate the sub-committee. 
Executive Summary 
The purpose of this report is to seek approval for an amendment to the procedure for
considering petitions received by the Council. 
Recommendations 
Council is recommended to agree the amendment to the process for considering petitions
received by the Council, as detailed in the report.  
The Plan for North Lanarkshire
Priority  Enhance participation, capacity, and empowerment across our
communities
Ambition statement (24) Review and design services around people, communities, and
shared resources

Page 2

2.3 It is proposed that the process be amended as detailed below:-  
Step 1 Petition received by the Council.  If petition relates to a specific
geographical area, it is sent to the appropriate Area Community
Partnership Manager.  If the petition relates to the Council area as a whole,
or across multiple LAP areas proceed to Step 4.
Step 2 The Area Community Partnership Manager considers whether the desired
outcomes can be actioned immediately.  If yes, this is undertaken.  If no,
proceed to Step 3.
Step 3 Petition is considered by the Petitions Sub-Committee. Options available
to the Sub-Committee are: (a) request further information, in which case it
would be considered at an appropriate future meeting; (b) agree fully or in
part, the terms of the petition, or (c) that no further action be taken. 
Should (b) “agree fully or in part, the terms of the petition”, be agreed, and
there are implications which may include, but not restricted to, budgetary
or resources, the petition, together with the recommendation from the Sub-
Committee, be submitted to the appropriate Committee.
Step 4 The appropriate Committee considers the petition and decides
accordingly. 
2.4 In reference to Step 3, the Petitions Sub-Committee may, if it so decides, agree to hold
a Hearing to consider the terms of the petition and it may invite members of the
community and/or stakeholders to address the Sub-Committee. 
3. Measures of success 
3.1  The proposed Council process is considered good practice   
4. Supporting documentation 
Appendix – report approved by the former Policy and Resources Committee held on 6
December 2022 
Archie Aitken
Head of Legal and Democratic Solutions

Page 3

5. Impacts ( http://connect/report-template-guidance ) 
5.1 Public Sector Equality Duty and Fairer Scotland Duty
Does the report contain information that has an impact as a result of the Public
Sector Equality Duty and/or Fairer Scotland Duty?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
If Yes, has an assessment been carried out and published on the council’s website?
https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/your-community/equalities/equality-and-fairer-
scotland-duty-impact-assessments
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.2 Financial impact
Does the report contain any financial impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant financial impacts have been discussed and agreed with
Financial Solutions?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.3 HR policy impact 
Does the report contain any HR policy or procedure impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant HR impacts have been discussed and agreed with People
and Organisational Development?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.4 Legal impact
Does the report contain any legal impacts (such as general legal matters, statutory
considerations (including employment law considerations), or new legislation)?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, have all relevant legal impacts have been discussed and agreed with Legal
and Democratic Solutions?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.5 Data protection impact 
Does the report / project / practice contain or involve the processing of personal
data?  
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, is the processing of this personal data likely to result in a high risk to the data
subject?
Yes ☐ No ☐
If Yes, has a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) been carried out and e-
mailed to dataprotection@northlan.gov.uk 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.6 Technology / Digital impact
Does the report contain information that has an impact on either technology, digital
transformation, service redesign / business change processes, data management, or
connectivity / broadband / Wi-Fi?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact?

Page 4

Where the impact identifies a requirement for technology, has an assessment been
carried out (or scheduled) by the Enterprise Architecture Governance Group
(EAGG)? 
Yes ☐ No ☐
5.7 Environmental / Carbon impact
Does the report / project / practice contain information that has an impact on any
environmental or carbon matters?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.8 Communications impact
Does the report contain any information that has an impact on the council’s
communications activities?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the impact? 
5.9 Risk impact
Is there a risk impact?
Yes ☐ No ☒
If Yes, please provide a brief summary of the key risks and potential impacts,
highlighting where the risk(s) are assessed and recorded (e.g. Corporate or Service
or Project Risk Registers), and how they are managed?

Page 5

North Lanarkshire Council
Report
Policy and Resources Committee
 approval Noting Ref: AR/EH Date: 6 December 2018
Petitions Received by the Council
From: Archie Aitken, Head of Business for Legal and Democratic Solutions
Email: AitkenA@northlan.gov.uk Telephone: 01698 302295
Executive Summary
This report seeks approval for a new process for considering Petitions or Deputations
received by the Council which are deemed non operational.
Recommendations
The Committee is recommended to approve the new procedure for considering petitions
received by the Council as detailed in Paragraph 2.4.
Supporting Documents
Council plan to 2020: Action 17 – Improve engagement with our communities to
maximise involvement and empowerment.
1. Background
1.1. At its meeting on 21 June 2018, the Council agreed the terms of the
following:-
"That research and other works to identify examples of best practice and
public engagement with Local Government be undertaken and a report to
the Policy and Resources Committee be submitted for consideration."
1.2. During meetings of Political Group Business Managers at which
consideration was given to a Review of Standing Orders, consideration
was given to information provided by officers on options for a procedure
relating to Petitions and/or Deputations received by the Council.  It was
agreed during those discussions that this matter would be dealt with
outwith the Review of Standing Orders.
Appendix 1

Page 6

2. Report 
2.1. The Policy and Resources Committee is reminded that the Council
already has a Petitions Policy which was approved by this Committee on
13 May 1997.  Specifically, it requires that a report be provided to the
appropriate Committee providing details of the petition received together
with actions undertaken and the outcome.  For information, the existing
policy stipulates that to be considered, a petition should be supported by
no less than 10 signatures, although there is discretion to waive this
requirement if deemed appropriate having regard to the merits. 
2.2. The Council decision of 21 June 2018 requires consideration to be given
to the introduction of a new protocol.  Representations have been made
to officers that such a protocol should ensure community engagement and
remove any barrier to inclusion by all community groups. 
2.3. Experience of Other Local Authorities 
2.3.1. Following the Council decision of 21 June 2018, officers undertook
a desktop exercise to review the way in which other local
authorities in Scotland process petitions as detailed on the
individual websites of each local authority.  It became clear that
virtually all of the other Scottish Councils, in respect of which
information could be obtained, used a single procedure for all of
their petitions – operational or otherwise.  Of the 17 authorities in
respect of which information was available, only five had
constituted a Petitions Committee, while the remainder included
the remit for considering petitions within either a single Committee
or, in most cases, all Committees depending on which was the
most appropriate forum to deal with the petition. 
2.3.2. Of the other authorities, the majority required the petitions to
contain a specific number of signatures; the lowest being one
signature other than the petitioner and the highest being 1,000 (or
10% of the registered electors if related to a specific geographical
area).  However, two authorities allow petitioners to submit their
petition without the need for supporting signatures and the petition
is then published on those Councils' websites with members of the
public being invited to support it.  Only when the level of support
reaches a specific threshold (100 and 200 signatures respectively)
will a petition be considered by those Councils.  In addition,
different threshold requirements have been put in place across
most other authorities if the petition has been submitted by a
private sector organisation/commercial enterprise. 
2.4. North Lanarkshire Model 
2.4.1. The table below details the process proposed to be followed upon
a petition being received by the Council 
Step 1 Request received by the Council.  If petition relates
to a specific geographical area, it is sent to the
appropriate Community Partnership Manager.  If
the petition relates to the Council area as a whole,
or across multiple LAP areas proceed to Step 4.

Page 7

Step 2 The Community Partnership Manager considers
whether desired outcomes can be actioned
immediately.  If yes, this is undertaken.  If no,
proceed to Step 3.
Step 3 Appropriate Local Area Partnership (LAP) is
provided with details of the petition within its
"Community Matters" business and considers
whether it wishes to proceed with the petition or not. 
If yes, LAP may request further information, in
which case it would be considered at an appropriate
future meeting.  If LAP able to determine
immediately, then may agree (a) that no further
action be taken, (b) that the LAP has available
budget and delegated authority to agree that the
terms of the petition be progressed, or (c) decide to
refer the petition to the appropriate Committee.
Step 4 The appropriate Committee considers the petition
and decides accordingly. 
3. Equality and Diversity 
3.1. Fairer Scotland 
There is no requirement to carry out a Fairer Scotland assessment in this
instance. 
3.2. Equality Impact Assessment 
There is no requirement to carry out an Equality Impact assessment in
this instance. 
4. Implications 
4.1. Financial Impact 
There is no Financial Impact. 
4.2. HR/Policy/Legislative Impact 
There is no HR/Policy/Legislative Impact. 
4.3. Environmental Impact 
There is no Environmental Impact. 
4.4. Risk Impact 
There is no Risk Impact.

Page 8

5. Measures of Success 
The proposed Council process is considered good practice. 
Head of Business for Legal and Democratic Solutions