Democracy Spraffa

Risk Management Update

North Lanarkshire Council · 18 May 2023
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Panel — 18 May 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

North Lanarkshire Council
Report
Audit and Scrutiny Panel
Does this report require to be approved? ☐ Yes   ☒ No
Ref:  KA/ASP/2023/May  Date 18/05/23
Risk Management update
From  Ken Adamson, Chief Officer (Audit and Risk)
E-mail adamsonk@northlan.gov.uk Telephone 07939 280602 
Executive Summary
This report provides the Panel with a brief overview of key risk management developments
since the most recent update report to the Panel in February 2023.
As well as providing an update on the Council’s corporate risk register and highlighting a
selection of the more significant issues which are of current focus from a risk perspective, the
report also provides a brief overview of the refreshed Risk Management Strategy which was
approved by the Policy and Strategy Committee on 16 March 2023 and of the subsequent
actions being taken forward by management.  The report also reflects on recent changes in
internal governance arrangements and ongoing developments on how risk issues are
managed and monitored by senior management and outlines the processes to be undertaken
as part of the annual review of the corporate risk register.
Strategically significant risks of current focus remain largely unchanged from the last update
and include responding to the ongoing challenges presented by current inflationary pressures,
delivering approved savings and ensuring the Council is able to effectively respond to expected
ongoing pressure on future funding for local government.  The Council is also fully engaged
with ongoing attempts to assess and respond effectively to the likely significant impacts of the
National Care Service draft legislation on service users, staff and the Council more generally. 
Finally, the approval of a revised Programme of Work to 2028 at the Policy and Strategy
Committee in March is being reflected in revised governance arrangements within which
effective risk management arrangements will continue to have a key role.
Significant operational risks of current focus include work to ensure the resilience of the
Council’s home care service in light of ongoing pressures, supporting the operation and
resilience of school transport, ongoing work relating to staffing issues, including responding to
recruitment and retention challenges and ensuring risk issues continue to be addressed in
relation to a number of significant projects and programmes of work. 
Recommendations
The Panel is asked to consider the contents of the report and to:
(1) note the current residual scores for those risks agreed for inclusion in the corporate risk
register for 2022-23 at Appendix 1;
(2) note the references to other topical risk issues highlighted in Section 2; and
(3) note the work ongoing to further strengthen and embed risk management arrangements. 
The Plan for North Lanarkshire
Priority  All priorities
Ambition statement All ambition statements

Page 2

1. Background
1.1 The Council’s Risk Management Strategy requires that the corporate risk register is
refreshed on an annual basis, led by the Corporate Risk Team, working with the Risk
Management Corporate Working Group (RMCWG) on behalf of, and in consultation with,
the Corporate Management Team (CMT).  In addition, each Service is required to
maintain its own risk register in respect of the operational service risks within their areas
of responsibility.  CMT previously approved the 2022-23 corporate risk register as
outlined in the table at Appendix 1.
1.2 It is widely recognised that the environment within which the Council operates and
provides services is dynamic, and corporate and service risk registers must continually
evolve to keep pace with, and accurately reflect, the ongoing challenges facing the
Council.  The Risk Management Strategy sets out required frequencies for the ongoing
review by management of both Corporate and Service risks.
Revised Risk Management Strategy (approved March 2023)
1.3 The revised Risk Management Strategy recently approved at the Policy and Strategy
Committee in March includes a number of changes from the previous version.  Overall,
these changes are minor and are designed to deliver incremental improvements to what
was an already sound approach consistent with current risk management good practice. 
The revised strategy reflects the Council’s current organisational structures and
corporate expectations in respect of risk management.
1.4 The most significant aspects of the revised Risk Management Strategy which differ from
the previous version include:
• Inclusion of a ‘Risk Management governance structure’ diagram which clearly lays
out the key groups involved in risk management activity across the organisation, and
the relationships between them;
• A new group category within Roles and Responsibilities for ‘Service Risk Forums’
which has been established to allow Service Risk Champions to better liaise with and
co-ordinate risk activities and reporting requirements with Risk Facilitators across
each Service.  These Service Risk Forums will support Service Management Teams
in relation to their risk management responsibilities;
• The Roles and Responsibilities section is now supplemented with information
outlining ‘The 3 Lines of Defence’ principles for managing risk which will clarify and
assist officers in understanding where responsibility for managing risk lies;
• The approach to risk scoring and assessment has been refreshed to provide more
specific guidance in the measurement of risk and expected responses to differing
levels of risk.  There has been some focus on ‘fine-tuning' the risk scoring approach
to ensure this provides greater differentiation in ratings (and rationale for those
ratings) within the ‘High’ residual risk category, which will enable Chief Officers and
elected members to better distinguish areas that require more focus;
• The opportunity has also been taken to formalise the Council’s risk reporting
arrangements and these are detailed within a risk reporting matrix; and
• For the first time, the strategy outlines how the organisation will go about monitoring
performance and compliance with the strategy, noting that results of such checks will
be included within future reporting to senior management and Elected Members.

Page 3

2. Report
2.1 The current approved corporate risk register for 2022-23 is at Appendix 1.  Risks
contained within the register have been subject to ongoing monitoring and review
throughout the year, with regular risk reporting to CMT and the Panel both on the overall
register, and with detail on individual risks being reported by relevant risk leads.
2.2 The definition of a corporate risk is ‘those risks which can impact the Council in
achieving its priorities and stated objectives and/or which are more strategic in nature
and require corporate oversight.  For example, such risks may have the potential to
impact many Services, and/or can impact significantly on the Council in terms of
financial costs and/or reputational damage.  The corporate risk register will reflect an
amalgamated position of Service-level risks and may also include significant service-
level risks which have been escalated for attention at a strategic level.’ 
Update on the 2022-23 corporate risk register
2.3 Since the last update to the Panel, there have been no substantive changes to the risks
contained within the corporate risk register or the scores of most of those risks.
2.4 Changes include the ‘Information governance - Data migration’ risk which has reduced
from 25 to 15, the ‘Improving educational outcomes’ risk which was previously awaiting
scoring but has now been finalised with a residual score of 9 and the ‘Impact of the
National Care Service proposals’ which was also previously unscored but which has
now been given a residual score of 25, reflecting the significant potential impacts and
the difficulty of assessing and mitigating associated risks given ongoing uncertainty
about the scope, timing and detailed operational impacts arising from the relevant
legislative process.
2.5 Additional issues currently being considered for future inclusion in the corporate risk
register include Black Start/power resilience (which is a national risk and relates to how
the Council would respond to the highly unlikely event of a total or partial shutdown of
the National Electricity Transmission System), home support service delivery and home
to school transport.
2.6 Currently all bar one of the risks are classified as ‘live’ with completed risk
documentation; the one risk classified as ‘draft’ where relevant documentation is
currently being finalised is ‘Target operating model’.
2.7 As reported to the Panel in February, the overall corporate risk profile continues to see
a notable number of risks which sit within the ‘High’ category for residual risk rating. 
This is to be expected because of the complex and challenging environment in which
the Council is operating, and the risk profile itself continues to be a key consideration
in the planning and decision-making activities of the Council.
2.8 Generally, corporate risks are being reviewed within reasonable timescales, however,
there can be occasions where they fall overdue and, when this occurs, Risk Leads are
reminded of the need to contact the corporate risk management team promptly when
e-mail reminders are received to advise that a risk is due its review.  The corporate risk
management team then assists in the facilitation and co-ordination of those reviews,
and timely consideration allows risk review frequencies to be maintained aligned to risk
rating, and avoid risks becoming out of date, ensuring risks are current and reflective
of the most current position.
Reviewing and updating the 2022-23 corporate risk register
2.9 The corporate risk register is amended as required on an ongoing basis, but is subject
to a formal annual review each Spring.  The object of undertaking a formal review is
that it allows structured consideration of whether the corporate risk register remains up-
to-date and properly reflective of the key risks, challenges and issues facing the
Council.

Page 4

2.10 The process for reviewing the corporate risk register involves the corporate risk
management team reviewing and updating a horizon scanning document which
considers the strategic environment facing the Council.  The process will also allow
consideration of risks associated with the Council’s ambitions and priorities as set out
in the revised Programme of Work and consideration as to whether any risks currently
sitting within service risk registers should be included in the corporate risk register.  Any
proposed changes to the corporate risk register will be submitted for approval to the
Council’s Business Management Team (BMT) and CMT.  The 2023-24 review process
will commence shortly and be concluded by the end of May.
Governance arrangements - oversight of risk registers
2.11 Recent changes to internal governance arrangements at senior management level
within the Council have provided an opportunity to strengthen and further embed risk
management and specific responsibilities in respect of risk have been included in
relevant terms of reference.  CMT retains responsibility for oversight of corporate risks
and ensuring that these are being managed in accordance with the approved risk
management strategy.  Service Management Team (SMT) meetings are now formally
expected to regularly review and monitor service risk registers ensuring that registers
are complete and up-to-date.  They are also expected to ensure that new and emerging
risks are identified, assessed, and managed effectively and that service risk registers
are used appropriately to support management decision-making.
2.12 The corporate risk management team have now developed formal measures to review
and report on compliance with the Council’s risk arrangements during 2023-24.  The
corporate risk management team will continue to work with corporate risk leads and
service risk champions to ensure that risks registers continue to capture and reflect the
current key challenges facing the organisation.
Snapshot of service risks
2.13 It had previously been proposed to supplement the corporate/strategic risk register
information included in this report with a summary of key service risks from service risk
registers to enable members to have sight of those risks with the highest residual risk
scores.  The preparation of this information has, however, led a number of Services to
indicate that they require to revisit their risk registers which they considered were not
always as complete, accurate and up-to-date as senior management might have
wished.
2.14 Rather than present the Panel with incomplete or out-of-date information, risk
information drawn from service risk registers will now be reported in August.  CMT has
recently emphasised to Services that current reviews must be completed as quickly as
possible and it is intended to undertake a dry-run at the end of June to assess Service’s
ability to provide meaningful information on service risks which can be reported to the
Panel in August.  Actions are also being taken to ensure that Service Management
Teams regularly formally review and monitor risk registers to ensure that registers are
complete, accurate and up-to-date, that new and emerging risks are identified,
assessed, and managed effectively and that service risk registers are used
appropriately to support management discussions and inform decision-making.
Strategic and operational risks of current focus
2.15 Strategically significant risks of current focus include responding to the ongoing
challenges presented by current inflationary pressures and increased uncertainty over
future levels of funding for local government in light of wider developments in UK and
Scottish public sector finances.  These issues have been the subject of recent reports
to the Policy and Strategy Committee.

Page 5

2.16 The Council is also fully engaged with wider policy developments which have the
potential to impact significantly on the Council and its corporate ambitions.  This
includes ongoing attempts to understand, assess and respond effectively to the likely
significant impacts on service users, staff, and the Council more generally of the
National Care Service draft legislation.  Responding to any outcomes arising from the
Scottish Government consultation on the future of education in Scotland is also likely
to be of increasing focus.  National developments in both areas will continue to be kept
under review and actioned as required, with updates provided to relevant Committees
at key development points.
2.17 Operationally, the Council continues to manage a wide range of risks associated with
day-to-day service delivery and progressing projects and programmes of work. 
Significant operational risks of current focus currently include work underway to ensure
the resilience of the Council’s home care service in light of ongoing pressures and the
increased challenges facing the Service, and ongoing work around responding to short
and longer-term challenges around the provision of school transport.  Staffing issues,
including recent industrial action, and responding to recruitment and retention
challenges, have also featured prominently in recent months.  Finally, risk issues
continue to be addressed in relation to a number of significant projects and
programmes of work including the Enterprise Contract and the planned acquisition of
Cumbernauld Town Centre, both of which were the subject of recent reports to the
Policy and Strategy Committee. 
3. Measures of success
3.1 The corporate risk management team will continue to report quarterly to BMT, CMT and
the Panel providing an overview of key developments in risk management and updating
on progress in respect of planned improvements to the Council’s risk management
arrangements.
3.2 The adequacy and effectiveness of the Council’s risk management arrangements will
be independently and regularly reviewed by Internal Audit, who will report directly on
the results of that work to the Panel.
3.3 Effective risk management arrangements assist the Council in achieving planned
outcomes and/or help the Council mitigate the impacts of adverse events. 
4. Supporting documentation 
Appendix 1: 2022-23 corporate risk register
Appendix 2:  Risk scoring matrix and descriptors 
Ken Adamson
Chief Officer (Audit and Risk)

Page 6

5. Impacts 
5.1 Public Sector Equality Duty and Fairer Scotland Duty
Does the report contain information that has an impact because of the Public Sector
Equality Duty and/or Fairer Scotland Duty?
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.2 Financial impact
Does the report contain any financial impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.3 HR policy impact 
Does the report contain any HR policy or procedure impacts?
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.4 Legal impact
Does the report contain any legal impacts (such as general legal matters, statutory
considerations (including employment law considerations), or new legislation)?
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.5 Data protection impact 
Does the report / project / practice contain or involve the processing of personal data?  
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.6 Technology / Digital impact
Does the report contain information that has an impact on either technology, digital
transformation, service redesign / business change processes, data management, or
connectivity / broadband / Wi-Fi?
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.7 Environmental / Carbon impact
Does the report / project / practice contain information that has an impact on any
environmental or carbon matters?
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.8 Communications impact
Does the report contain any information that has an impact on the council’s
communications activities?
Yes ☐ No ☒
5.9 Risk impact
Is there a risk impact?
Yes ☒ No ☐
If yes, please provide a summary of the key risks and potential impacts, highlighting
where the risk(s) are assessed and recorded (e.g. Corporate or Service or Project
Risk Registers), and how they are managed?
Effective risk management arrangements including the identification, assessment,
management and oversight of relevant risks will increase the likelihood of the Council
achieving its ambitions and plans by making it more likely that the Council will be able
to effectively mitigate potential threats to planned outcomes.  It also contributes to
effective management of risks relating to all service and operational areas.
5.10 Armed Forces Covenant Duty
Does the report require to take due regard of the Armed Forces Covenant Duty (i.e.
does it relate to healthcare, housing, or education services for in-Service or ex-
Service personnel, or their families, or widow(er)s)?
Yes    ☐                No ☒

Page 7

Appendix 1: 2022-23 corporate risk register 
CORPORATE RISKS (Operational) Likelihood Impact Rating Evaluation
1. Information governance and Information security 5 4 20 High
2. ICT operational capability 4 4 16 High
3. Public protection 4 4 16 High
4. Human resources 4 4 16 High
5. Governance, leadership and decision-making 4 4 16 High
6. Supply chain risk 4 4 16 High
7. Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry 4 4 16 High
8. Information governance – Data migration 3 5 15 Medium
9. Health and Safety 5 3 15 Medium
10. Business continuity planning 5 3 15 Medium
11. Terrorism 3 5 15 Medium
12. Procurement risk 3 4 12 Medium
13. Resilience planning 2 5 10 Medium
14. Serious organised crime, fraud and corruption  3 3 9 Medium
CORPORATE RISKS (Strategic) Likelihood Impact Rating Proximity     
15. Impact of National Care Service 5 5 25 Very High
16. Tackling poverty 5 4 20 High
17. Climate change 4 4 16 High
18. Implementation of Economic Regeneration
Development Plan  3 5 15 Medium
19. Financial sustainability 3 5 15 Medium
20. Enterprise Project 3 4 12 Medium
21. Managing strategic change  3 4 12 Medium
22. Digital and IT strategy 4 3  12 Medium
23. Engagement and consultation 3 3 9 Medium
24. Improving educational outcomes  3 3 9 Medium
25. Target operating model – (Ensuring resources
(workforce, digital and assets) and service delivery
are fully aligned to support the successful
implementation of the Council’s future operating
model. 
To be
confirmed
To be
confirmed
To be
confirmed
To be
confirmed

Page 8

APPENDIX 2: LIKELIHOOD / IMPACT DESCRIPTORS AND RISK MATRIX
Likelihood Descriptors:
Score Probability of occurrence Description
5 Over 90% Almost certain to occur within 12 months
4 61-90% Likely to occur within 12 months
3 31-60% Possible that it may occur within 12 months
2 11 - 30% Unlikely to occur within 12 months 
1 10% or less Rare that it would occur within 12 months
Impact Descriptors:
Score
Description of impact
On Service
Objectives Financial On people On time to recover On reputation
5 Catastrophic
Unable to
function, inability
to fulfil
obligations
Severe financial
loss (over 25%
of budget)
Death
Serious – more than 2
years to recover to pre-
event position
Highly damaging,
severe loss of public
confidence
4 Major
Significant
impact on
service
objectives
Major financial
loss (between
10% and 25% of
budget)
Extensive injury,
major
permanent harm
Major – between 1 and
2 years to recover to
pre-event position
Major adverse publicity,
major loss of
confidence
3 Moderate
Moderate impact
on service
objectives
Significant
financial loss
(between 2.5%
and 10% of
budget)
Medical
treatment
required, semi-
permanent harm
up to one year
Considerable –
between 6 months to 1
year to recover to pre-
event position
Some adverse
publicity, legal
implications
2 Minor
Minor impact on
service
objectives
Moderate
financial loss
(between 1%
and 2.5% of
budget)
First aid
treatment, non-
permanent harm
up to 1 month
Some – 2 to 6 months
to recover to pre-event
position
Short-term public
embarrassment and no
damage to reputation
1 Insignificant
Minimal impact,
no service
disruption
Minimal loss (up
to 1% of budget)
No obvious
harm/injury
Minimal – up to 2
months to recover
No interest to the
media, internal only.
Risk Matrix:
Likelihood
5 - Almost certain 5 10 15 20 25
4 - Likely 4 8 12 16 20
3 - Possible 3 6 9 12 15
2 - Unlikely 2 4 6 8 10
1 - Rare 1 2 3 4 5 
1 - Insignificant 2 - Minor 3 - Moderate 4 - Major 5 - Catastrophic
Impact
Risk Rating
Insignificant
1-3
Low
4-6
Medium
8-12
High
15-25

Page 9

No embedded text on this page.