Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Planning Committee - 22/02/2023

North Ayrshire Council · 22 February 2023
Back to Planning Committee — 22 February 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

North Ayrshire Council, Cunninghame House, Irvine KA12 8EE         
Planning Committee 
A Meeting of the Planning Committee of North Ayrshire Council will be held in the
Council Chambers, Ground Floor, Cunninghame House, Irvine, KA12 8EE on
Wednesday, 22 February 2023 at 14:00 to consider the undernoted business. 
Meeting Arrangements - Hybrid Meetings
This meeting will be held on a predominantly physical basis but with
provision, by prior notification, for remote attendance by Elected
Members in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 2003.  Where possible, the meeting will be live-streamed
and available to view at https://north-ayrshire.public-
i.tv/core/portal/home.   
1 Declarations of Interest
Members are requested to give notice of any declarations of interest in
respect of items of business on the Agenda. 
2 Minutes
The accuracy of the Minutes of the Meeting of the Planning Committee
held on 25 January 2023 will be confirmed and the Minutes signed in
accordance with Paragraph 7 (1) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973 (copy enclosed). 
3 National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4)
Submit report by the Executive Director (Place) on the adoption of
NPF4  (copy enclosed). 
4 Tree Preservation Order: Grouping of Trees adjacent to Wildcat Lane
and Summerlea Road, West Kilbride
Submit report by the Chief Planning Officer regarding confirmation of a
Tree Preservation Order (TPO) for a group of trees located along Wildcat
Road and Summerlea Road, West Kilbride (copy enclosed).
1

Page 2

North Ayrshire Council, Cunninghame House, Irvine KA12 8EE 
5 Tree Preservation Order: Grouping of Trees located at Stevenston
High Kirk and Manse
Submit report by the Chief Planning Officer regarding the process and
merits of protecting a group of trees located on the grounds of
Stevenston High Kirk and the adjacent Manse (copy enclosed). 
6 Notice under Section 127 of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997: Tennox Farm, Kilbirnie
Submit report by the Chief Planning Officer seeking approval for the
service of a Notice under Section 127 of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act, 1997 requiring the removal of the unauthorised
dwellinghouse, associated outbuildings and ancillary works at Tennox
Farm, Kilbirnie and restoration of the land to its former condition prior to
development (copy enclosed). 
7 Urgent Items
Any other items which the Chair considers to be urgent.  
Webcasting
Please note: this meeting may be filmed/recorded/live-streamed to the
Council's internet site and available to view at https://north-ayrshire.public-
i.tv/core/portal/home, where it will be capable of repeated viewing.  At the
start of the meeting, the Provost/Chair will confirm if all or part of the
meeting is being filmed/recorded/live-streamed.
You should be aware that the Council is a Data Controller under the Data
Protection Act 2018.  Data collected during the webcast will be retained in
accordance with the Council’s published policy, including, but not limited
to, for the purpose of keeping historical records and making those records
available via the Council’s internet site.
Generally, the press and public seating areas will not be filmed. However,
by entering the Council Chambers, using the press or public seating area
or (by invitation) participating remotely in this meeting, you are consenting
to being filmed and consenting to the use and storage of those images and
sound recordings and any information pertaining to you contained in them
for webcasting or training purposes and for the purpose of keeping
historical records and making those records available to the public. If you
do not wish to participate in a recording, you should leave the
meeting.  This will constitute your revocation of consent.
If you have any queries regarding this and, in particular, if you believe that
use and/or storage of any particular information would cause, or be likely
to cause, substantial damage or distress to any individual, please contact
dataprotectionofficer@north-ayrshire.gov.uk. 
2

Page 3

North Ayrshire Council, Cunninghame House, Irvine KA12 8EE 
Planning Committee Sederunt 
Robert Foster (Chair)
Timothy Billings (Vice-Chair)
Scott Davidson
Stewart Ferguson
Cameron Inglis
Amanda Kerr
Davina McTiernan
Jim Montgomerie
Ian Murdoch
Chloe Robertson 
Chair: 
Apologies: 
Attending: 
3

Page 4

4

Page 5

Planning Committee
25 January 2023 
At a Meeting of the Planning Committee of North Ayrshire Council at 2.00 p.m.
involving a combination of participation by remote electronic means and physical
attendance within the Council Chambers, Irvine 
Present (Physical Participation)
Robert Foster, Timothy Billings Stewart Ferguson and Cameron Inglis 
Present (Remote Participation)
Amanda Kerr, Jim Montgomerie, Ian Murdoch and Chloé Robertson. 
Also Present (Physical Participation)
Todd Ferguson (Agenda Items 1 – 3). 
In Attendance
J. Miller, Chief Planning Officer (Planning); R. Lynch, Senior Manager, J. Niven,
Solicitor (Legal Services), H. Clancy, C. Stewart and S. Wilson Committee
Services Officers (Democratic Services) (Chief Executive’s Service). 
Also in Attendance
G. Cloughley, G. Buckley and J. Martin (Objectors) and K. Murphy, S. Livingston and
S. Fallon (Applicant’s Representatives) (Agenda Items 1 – 3). 
Chair
Councillor Foster in the Chair. 
Apologies
Scott Davidson and Davina McTiernan. 
1. Declarations of Interest 
There were no declarations of interest by Members in terms of Standing Order 11
and Section 5 of the Code of Conduct for Councillors. 
2. Minutes 
The Minutes of the Meeting held on 22 November were confirmed and signed in
accordance with Paragraph 7 (1) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government (Scotland)
Act 1973. 
3. 21/01174/PPM: Site To North Of Summerlea Road And West Of Snowdon
Terrace, Seamill, West Kilbride 
Persimmon Homes have applied for planning permission for the erection of 220
dwelling houses and associated infrastructure and landscaping at the site to the
north of Summerlea Road and West of Snowdon Terrace, Seamill, West Kilbride. 
158 objections, 1 representation of support and 3 neutral representations were
received and detailed in the report. 
Agenda Item 2
5

Page 6

The Chair advised that he had accepted a request from an Objector to address the
Committee in terms of their objections to the application. George Cloughley, Graham
Buckley and Janet Martin were in attendance to speak to the terms of their objection. 
Persimmon Homes, as the applicant, had been invited to respond to the objections
raised.  Kevin Murphy, Steven Livingston and Simon Fallon were in attendance as
representatives of the applicant.   
The Senior Manager (Legal Services) outlined the terms of the Procedure for those
addressing the Planning Committee and all parties confirmed their understanding
and acceptance thereof. 
Mr Cloughley addressed the Committee in support of the objections and highlighted
there were 175 objections at LDP stage, 158 objections at the planning stage, 700
signatures on a petition, 200 people attended at candlelight vigil, over 100 people
signed a letter from West Kilbride Community Council in support of the objections. 
Mr Cloughley referred to the 684 bedrooms on the developers’ drawings but advised
831 were shown when looking at the individual house types.  220 houses were
proposed but only 175 recommended by the Scottish Government and the 460
parking spaces stated in the application seemed a high number as the objectors
could only see 300 parking spaces on the plans. 
Mr Cloughley referred to the population numbers of West Kilbride and the possibility
of an additional 1100 people, with a population of 4,700 this represents a 23% rise
and advised the town did not have the infrastructure to cope with this.  Mr Cloughley
also advised the traffic census had been undertaken during lockdown.  Mr Cloughley
highlighted that the developer’s plans showed houses built over the top of the pipe
section of Wildcat Burn and also referred to the Reporter’s recommendation that the
developer should contribute to local infrastructure.  Mr Cloughley advised the site
entrance should be taken from Portencross road, the Transport Scotland conditions
could not be addressed, and the application should be refused. 
Mr Buckley also spoke in support of the objections, referring to previous planning
applications that had been refused for the same site.  He made reference to the
Spatial Strategy under Policy One of the Local Development Plan and highlighted
the proposed site was prime arable land used to produce 3 crops per year.  Mr
Buckley expressed the view that housing development should be advantageous and
a benefit to the local community, while the proposed development was detrimental to
the local community due to the inadequate infrastructure and services required for
the development.  It was Mr Buckley’s position that all local councillors, local MSPs
and West Kilbride Community Council were against the development. 
Mr Buckley also highlighted the 9 conditions relating to trunk road modifications,
crossing points, new footpaths and modifications to existing footpaths which were
site specific and would not be relevant to another site and there was no provision for
crossing the B7048. 
Ms Martin also addressed the committee in support of the objections, advising that
the local community do not want to expand the village while diminishing local
services.  She referred to the regeneration work of the local community over the past
20 years.  Ms Martin also highlighted a lack of communication, clarity and
consideration in terms of the consultation process. 
6

Page 7

Mr Murphy then addressed the Committee on behalf of the applicant, in response to
the objectors.  He referred to the allocation of the site proposed through the LDP in
2019 and the aim of the Spatial Strategy to provide a balance across North Ayrshire
in terms of where new developments took place and the balance of the type of sites
brought forward. Mr Murphy advised the site was intended in the LDP to play a key
role in the delivery of new housing in North Ayrshire and support a number of key
objectives, such as attracting inward investment, creating jobs, delivering economic
growth, and growing the population of North Ayrshire (particularly with regard to
attracting and retaining residents of a working age). 
Mr Murphy referred to the mix of housing types on the site being specially designed
to provide a range and choice for the local community at each stage of their housing
journey, from first time buyers and families to those looking to downsize. He advised
that the house types ranged from 2-bed starter homes to 5-bed detached family
homes, as well as 16 bungalows designed to meet the needs of older people.  Mr
Murphy highlighted that, over the past 5 years, 32% of sales from outwith North
Ayrshire and 81% of Persimmon Homes purchased in North Ayrshire had been to
people under the age for 40 with 45% sold to first-time buyers. 
Mr Murphy advised that the capacity for the site identified in the LDP was indicative,
with the eventual unit numbers coming from a more detailed technical analysis of the
site and surrounding infrastructure and could easily accommodate 220 houses.  He
indicated that Persimmon Homes were also committed to fund works to improve the
local primary school. 
Mr Murphy then referred to the layout of the site, highlighting the proposed retention
of trees on Summerlea Road and Wildcat Lane, the maintenance of views to Arran
along the A78 through a series of visual corridors, significant landscaping to the site,
retention of the existing stonewall along the boundary and the introduction of new
crossing points on the A78.  He advised that Persimmon Homes had also addressed
all road safety points raised by Transport Scotland and North Ayrshire Council
Roads Department to ensure safe routes to the Primary School and village centre. A
full flood risk assessment and drainage strategy had been completed, all surface
water would be controlled by a sustainable urban drainage system and the site
would continue to drain to Wildcat Burn.  Eight of the 90 trees on site required to be
removed, with a root assessment still required for a further 6 trees, and any tree
removal would be offset with new tree planting management.  To minimise disruption
to the local community, a construction traffic management plan would be
implemented, and Persimmon Homes would update the local community as the
development advanced. 
The objectors were then afforded an opportunity to make brief final comments.  Mr
Cloughley referred to the number of 2-bed houses and the pipe section of the
Wildcat Burn to be accommodated through a field drain. 
At the Chair’s discretion, Councillor Todd Ferguson, as Local Member was invited to
speak and expressed support for the objectors’ comments and noted the reduction
from 262 to 220 units feel short of the indicative 175 in the Local Development Plan. 
7

Page 8

Members then asked questions of the objectors and applicant’s representatives and
received further information on the following: - 
• house numbers and the recommendation by the Scottish Government for 175
houses;
• use of adequate garages as parking spaces and the calculation of these
spaces;
• the increase of approximately 25% in local population over the last 15 years;
and 
• the pipe burn and field drain at Wildcat Burn. 
The Chief Planning Officer then outlined the terms of the planning report.   
The Committee was invited to note that a road construction consent was required by
Persimmon Homes to facilitate this development and a further condition, relating to
road safety measures was proposed to allow pedestrians to safely cross the B7408. 
Members had the opportunity to ask further questions and received clarification on
the following: - 
• the adequacy of the current local infrastructure to support the application in
terms of the anticipated increase in population;
• local primary school improvements and proposed timescales for this;
• ongoing maintenance and additional staff due to the expansion of the local
primary school;
• trees on the southern end of the site, and an area of Wild Cat Lane to be
covered by a provisional Tree Preservation Order;
• road safety in light of an increased number of people crossing the B7408;
• consultation with the NHS and an apparent conflict between the information
presented and the experience of local constituents;
• A detailed drainage assessment to identify any potential flood risk, the
outcome of which had been factored into proposed Condition 23; and 
• additional Primary School needs to meet the demand of the site. 
Councillor Billings, seconded by Councillor Murdoch, moved that the application be
refused on the grounds that Committee did not have adequate assurances on the
medical practice provision for the local area. 
Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Montgomerie, moved that the application
be granted, subject to (a) the completion of a Section 75 Agreement on the required
educational contributions, and (b) the conditions noted within the report 
On a division and a roll call vote, there voted for the amendment Councillors Foster,
Inglis, Kerr and Montgomerie and (4) and for the motion, Councillors Billings,
Ferguson, Murdoch and Robertson (4), and on the casting vote of the Chair, the
amendment was declared carried. 
On a point of order, Councillor Billings requested clarification whether, in the event of
an equality of votes, a casting vote should be used to maintain the status quo, which
would in this case mean that the development should not proceed. 
8

Page 9

In terms of Standing Order 6.8, the Chair agreed that the meeting be adjourned at
3.35 p.m. for the Committee to receive legal advice. The meeting reconvened at 4.10
p.m. with the same Members and officers present and in attendance (as previously
by remote electronic means or in person). 
The Senior Manager (Legal Services) confirmed to the Committee that, in terms of
Part 1(1) Preliminary and specifically Standing Order 19.6 relating to meetings and
proceedings of the Council and Committees, a casting vote could be exercised by
the Chair in these circumstances and the decision, therefore, stood. In addition, the
terms of Schedule 7, paragraph 5(2) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973
and the considerations to determining planning applications under the Town and
Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 were further referred to. 
Accordingly, the Committee agreed (a) to grant the application, subject to the
following conditions: - 
1.  That prior to the commencement of the development, a written scheme of
investigation for a programme of archaeological works shall be submitted to the
Council, as Planning Authority, for written approval and agreement of the West
of Scotland Archaeological Service. Thereafter any programme of works as
agreed will be carried out in accordance with the written scheme to the
satisfaction of the Council, as Planning Authority. 
2.  That prior to the commencement of the development, a desk study of the site to
assess the likelihood of contamination and assist the design of an appropriate
site investigation and subsequent suitable risk assessment, including
remediation proposals if required, shall be undertaken. The study shall be
verified by a suitably qualified Environmental Consultant and shall be submitted
to and approved by the Council, as Planning Authority, prior to commencement
of the development. 
3.  That the presence of any significant unsuspected contamination that becomes
evident during the development of the site shall be brought to the attention of
NAC Environmental Health. Thereafter a suitable investigation strategy as
agreed with North Ayrshire Council shall be implemented and any necessary
remediation works carried out prior to any further development taking place on
the site, all to the satisfaction of Council as Planning Authority. 
4.  On completion of the development, written verification detailing what was done
by way of any remediation shall be submitted to the Council, as Planning
Authority. 
5.  That prior to the commencement of the development, a Construction
Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) shall be submitted for the approval
of the Council, as Planning Authority. The CEMP shall include the proposed
Dust Mitigation recommended in Appendix 6 of the Air Quality Impact
Assessment report by ITPEnergised, Project No 4667 v1, submitted as part of
this application, dated 25th November 2021. The CEMP shall also include a
Construction Traffic Management Plan which will include details of construction
vehicle wheel washing. The development will be carried out in accordance with
any CEMP as may be approved. 
9

Page 10

6.  That prior to the commencement of the development, the detailed design for
the proposed access to the trunk road, shall be submitted to the Council, as
Planning Authority, for approval in consultation with Transport Scotland as the
Trunk Roads Authority. Detailed designs shall be to a standard compliant with
DMRB CD 123. 
7.  There shall be no access to or from the A78 trunk road until the new access to
the trunk road has been constructed and completed in accordance with any
details as approved under Condition 6. For the avoidance of doubt no access
for construction traffic shall be taken from Summerlea Road. 
8.  That prior to the commencement of the development, details regarding the
design for the proposed geometric alterations to the A78/B7048 priority
junction, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council, as
Planning Authority, in consultation with Transport Scotland as the Trunk Roads
Authority. Any approved works shall be carried out prior to the occupation of
any part of the site. 
9.  That prior to the commencement of the development, detailed design and final
location for the proposed signal-controlled pedestrian crossing shall be
submitted to the Council, as Planning Authority, for approval in consultation
with Transport Scotland as the Trunk Roads Authority. Any crossing as may be
approved shall be constructed prior to the occupation of any part of the site. 
10.  That prior to the commencement of the development, detailed design of the
A78 footway between the pedestrian crossing and the A78/B7048 junction shall
be submitted to the Council, as Planning Authority, for approval in consultation
with Transport Scotland as the Trunk Roads Authority. Any footway as may be
approved shall be constructed prior to the occupation of any part of the site. 
11.  That prior to the commencement of the development, details regarding the
design for the proposed geometric alterations to the A78/Summerlea Road
priority junction, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council,
as Planning Authority, in consultation with Transport Scotland as the Trunk
Roads Authority. Any approved works shall be carried out prior to the
occupation of any part of the site. 
12.  That prior to the commencement of the development, detailed design and final
location for the uncontrolled pedestrian crossing shall be submitted to the
Council, as Planning Authority, for approval in consultation with Transport
Scotland as the Trunk Roads Authority. Any crossing as may be approved shall
be constructed prior to the occupation of any part of the site. 
13.  That prior to commencement of the development, a Phasing Plan shall be
submitted for approval by the Council, in consultation with Transport Scotland
as the Trunk Roads Authority. The development will thereafter be carried out in
accordance with any phasing plan as may be approved. 
14.  That prior to the occupation of any part of the development, a comprehensive
Travel Plan that sets out proposals for reducing dependency on the private car
has been submitted and approved by the Council, as Planning Authority, in
consultation with Transport Scotland as the Trunk Roads Authority. 
10

Page 11

15.  That prior to the commencement of the development details of all boundary
treatments both within and on the edges of the site shall be submitted to the
Council, as Planning Authority, for approval. Any boundary for the edge of the
trunk road will be approved in consultation with Transport Scotland. Any
proposed new boundary treatments shall include 13cm x 13cm gaps to allow
animal movement. 
16.  That prior to the commencement of the development details of all existing and
proposed landscaping and play areas, including management and maintenance
details, shall be submitted to the Council, as Planning Authority, for approval.
Landscaping shall include the recommendations set out in Section 7, Paras 3 –
5 and 10 of the Ecological Assessment report by JDC Ecology, submitted as
part of this application, dated 1st December 2021. 
17.  That any landscaping scheme as may be approved under Condition 16 shall be
carried out in the first planting season following completion or occupation of the
houses within the relevant phases approved under condition 13, whichever is
soonest, or unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Council, as Planning
Authority. Any trees or plants which, within a period of five years from the
completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged
or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of a
similar size and species, unless the Council, as Planning Authority, gives
written consent to any variation. 
18.  That the any play area for the southern end of the site approved under
Condition 16 shall be erected and available for use prior to the occupation of
any houses on Plots 19 to 26 or Plots 56 to 64 unless otherwise agreed in
writing by the Council, as Planning Authority. 
19.  That the any play area for the northern end of the site approved under
Condition 16 shall be erected and available for use prior to the occupation of
any houses on Plots 181 to 189 or Plots 201 to 204 unless otherwise agreed in
writing by the Council, as Planning Authority. 
20.  That prior to the commencement of the development details of tree protection
measures during construction shall be submitted to the Council, as Planning
Authority. The details should conform with BS 5837. Prior to the
commencement of plots 44-52 an Arboricultural Impact Assessment to agree
driveway positions n is to be submitted to and approved by the Council, as
Planning Authority. Any details as may be approved will be implemented prior
to the commencement of any works. 
21.  That prior to the commencement of the development details of footway
widening on the B7048 to a minimum of 2m, unless otherwise agreed in writing
with the Council, as Planning Authority, from the junction of the A78 to No. 30
Portencross Road shall be submitted to the Council, as Planning Authority, for
approval. Any details as may be approved shall be carried out prior to the
occupation of the development. 
11

Page 12

22.  That prior to the commencement of the development, details of measures to
address the runoff entering the northeast corner of the site from the A78 and
B7048 road junction are submitted to the Council, as Planning Authority, for
approval. Thereafter the development will be carried out in accordance with any
details as may be approved. 
23.  That prior to the commencement of the development, an appropriately detailed
drainage assessment identifying any potential flood risk from the proposed
surface water infrastructure at times up to and including the 1 in 200 year the
critical storm event (plus climate change and urban creep allowances) shall be
submitted to the Council, as Planning Authority, for approval. Where flood risk
is confirmed, flood flow-paths should be designed and maintained to disperse
exceedance flows to the water environment without affecting people and
property during times of intense rainfall. Such flood flow-paths should be
provided for approval prior to the commencement of the development. 
24.  That prior to the commencement of the development, the detailed design of the
SuDS basin shall be provided to the Council, as Planning Authority, for
approval. This should include measures such as a section of reduced crest
level that would control overtopping when the holding capacity of the basin is
exceeded, either during periods of intense rainfall or when the outfall is
blocked. Thereafter the development will be carried out in accordance with any
details as may be approved. 
25.  That prior to the commencement of the development, details of the site levels
for the western side of the site shall be submitted to the Council, as Planning
Authority, for approval. Thereafter the development will be carried out in
accordance with any details as may be approved. 
26.  That prior to the commencement of the development, full details of water quality
treatment measures are submitted to the Council, as Planning Authority, for
approval. Thereafter the development will be carried out in accordance with any
details as may be approved. 
27.  That the footpath links on the eastern side of the site shall be formed and open
prior to the occupation of the adjacent house. The footpath link on the southern
side of the site shall be formed and open prior to the occupation of Plot 53. The
footpath link on the southern side of the western side of the site shall be formed
and open prior to the occupation of Plots 190 and 191. The footpath link on the
northern end of the western side of the site shall be formed and open prior to
the occupation of Plot 153. 
28.  That, prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, a
statement containing details of the heat and power systems for the houses,
which shall include low or zero carbon technologies to demonstrate that at least
10% of the current carbon emissions reduction set by Scottish Building
Standards will be met, shall be submitted for the written approval of the
Council, as Planning Authority. Thereafter, the development shall be
implemented in accordance with such details as may be approved unless
otherwise agreed in writing with the Council, as Planning Authority. 
12

Page 13

29.  That prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, the
developer shall provide full details of the proposed finishing materials for the
written approval of North Ayrshire Council as Planning Authority. Thereafter,
the development shall progress in accordance with such details as may be
approved. 
30. That prior to the commencement of the development details of a pedestrian
crossing for the B7048 to the east of the junction with the A78 shall be
submitted to the Council, as Planning Authority, for approval. Any details as
may be approved shall be carried out prior to the occupation of the
development. 
Councillors Montgomerie and Murdoch left the meeting at this point. 
4. 22/00890/PPP: Site to North Of Kirn Point, Newton Road, Lochranza 
John Thomson Construction Ltd have applied for planning permission in principle for
four residential plots and re-aligned access path at the site to the north of Kirn Point,
Newton Road, Lochranza. 56 objections, 53 from individuals and 3 on behalf of
groups (Lochranza and Catacol Community Association, Arran Civic Trust and
Community of Arran Seabed Trust) and 2 expressions of support were received and
detailed in the report. 
The Committee unanimously agreed to grant the application, subject to the following
conditions: -
1.  That prior to the commencement of any development on site, a further planning
application(s) for the approval of the matters specified in this condition (MSC)
must be submitted to and approved by North Ayrshire Council as Planning
Authority. These matters are as follows: 
(a) details of the design, siting and external finishes of the proposed houses; 
(b) details of the means of de-lineation of the individual residential plots; 
(c) the design and location of all boundary treatments including any walls or
fences and hard landscaped areas; 
(d) the means of drainage and surface water strategy and methodology for
sewage disposal, including Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS), all
set out in a comprehensive Drainage Assessment, including ongoing
maintenance details. Such SUDS shall be self-certified by a suitably qualified
person; 
(e) the landscaping and associated maintenance proposals for the site,
including details of existing trees, hedgerows and other planting to be retained
and any tree protection measures together with proposals for any new planting,
specifying number, size and species of all trees and shrubs, a management
implementation programme and proposals to replace any landscaping which
fails in the first five years following planting; and 
(f) details of the heat and power systems for the houses, which shall include
low and/or zero carbon technologies to demonstrate that at least 10% of the
current carbon emissions reduction set by Scottish Building Standards will be
met. For the avoidance of doubt, the houses proposed for the site shall be of
traditional design and no more than one and a half storeys in height. All of the
above shall be to the satisfaction of North Ayrshire Council as planning
authority. 
13

Page 14

2.  That prior to the commencement of any development works on the site: (i)
intervisible passing places shall be provided and maintained thereafter on the
road to the front of the site to the agreement and satisfaction of North Ayrshire
Council as Planning Authority; (ii) the existing surfaced turning point at the
northwest of the site shall be retained and shall not be included within the
curtilage of any house. Full details of the matters above shall be submitted with
the subsequent application(s) for detailed planning permission, all to the
satisfaction of North Ayrshire Council as planning authority. 
3.  That the Right of Way (ref:SCU123/1) which runs through the site hereby
approved shall not be stopped up or diverted in any way until a Path Diversion
Order has been made and confirmed under S.208 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act. 
4.  That the recommendations contained in Section 5.3 of the Preliminary
Ecological Appraisal, prepared by Starling Learning and submitted with the
application hereby approved, shall be implemented in full prior to the
commencement of any development works on the site and that the details,
conclusions and recommendations of a further otter survey shall be submitted
with the subsequent planning application(s) for detailed planning permission, all
to the satisfaction of North Ayrshire Council as planning authority. 
5.  That details of site sections and the finished floor levels of the proposed houses
shall be submitted with the subsequent application(s) for detailed planning
permission to ensure that no development takes place below 4.22m AOD, all to
the satisfaction of North Ayrshire Council as planning authority. 
5. Urgent Items 
The Chair agreed that the following item be considered as a matter of urgency. 
5.1 Planning Performance Framework 
Submitted report by the Executive Director (Place) on the feedback from the Scottish
Government on the 2021/22 Planning Performance Framework.  The Performance
Markers report was set out at Appendix 1 to the report. 
The Chief Planning Officer advised the Planning Committee that the Scottish
Government (SG) PPF audit assessed the 15 performance markers through the
RAG rating and provided commentary on each marker. Following representation to
the Government, North Ayrshire Council had given a green rating for all of the
relevant markers.  The Committee commended Officers for their continued best
practice in delivering the Planning Service for the benefit of the communities and
developers of North Ayrshire. 
Noted. 
The meeting ended at 4.35 p.m. 
14

Page 15

NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 
22 February 2023 
Planning Committee 
Title:    National Planning Framework 4 
Purpose:  To advise the Planning Committee that Scotland’s fourth
National Planning Framework (NPF4) has been adopted and
the provisions of the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019 which
amend the composition of the development plan to include the
National Planning Framework have been commenced. 
Recommendation:  To note the adoption of National Planning Framework 4 and
that it is now part of the development plan for North Ayrshire. 
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 On 13 February 2023, Scottish Ministers adopted and published National Planning
Framework 4 (NPF4). On adoption, NPF4 became part of the statutory development
plan for North Ayrshire. Prepared by the Scottish Government, the National Planning
Framework is a long-term spatial strategy, establishing the principles and policies
which underpin the planning system and guide where and how development should
take place. 
1.2  NPF4 sets out a national spatial strategy looking forward to 2045. It places the twin
global climate and nature crises at the heart of a vision for a future Scotland to ensure
decisions made today are in the long-term public interest. NPF4 seeks to support the
planning and delivery of sustainable, liveable and productive places which reduce
emissions; restore and better connect biodiversity; enable us to live better, healthier
lives; and create a greener, fairer and more inclusive wellbeing economy. The delivery
of the spatial strategy is supported by the designation of eighteen national
developments, including Hunterston, regional spatial priorities for five broad regions of
Scotland and 33 national planning policies. 
1.3 Changes to planning legislation in 2019 – which commenced this month alongside the
adoption of NPF4 – mean that the National Planning Framework has increased status
in decision-making. Decisions on planning applications must be made in accordance
with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise: NPF4
now sits alongside North Ayrshire’s adopted Local Development Plan (LDP2) as the
development plan. Its policies are directly relevant in the assessment and
determination of planning applications. The Council’s next Local Development Plan
(LDP3) and any Local Place Plans prepared by community bodies to inform LDP3
must take account of NPF4. 
Agenda Item 3
15

Page 16

2. Background 
2.1 Scotland 2045: our Fourth National Planning Framework, commonly known as NPF4,
is required by law to set out the Scottish Ministers’ policies and proposals for the
development and use of land. It plays a key role in supporting the delivery of
Scotland’s national outcomes and the United Nations Sustainable Development
Goals. Legislation also requires the NPF to contribute to six outcomes, namely:
meeting the housing needs and improving the health and wellbeing of people living in
Scotland; increasing the population of rural areas; improving equality and eliminating
discrimination; meeting targets relating to the reduction of emissions of greenhouse
gases, and; securing positive effects for biodiversity. Aligned with a wider programme
of planning reform, work commenced to prepare Scotland’s fourth National Planning
Framework (NPF4) at the beginning of 2020. 
2.2  During January to April 2020, the Scottish Government sought early views on NPF4
through a 'Call for Ideas', inviting stakeholders to consider Scotland in 2045 and
reflecting on planning policy changes and national developments needed to get there.
In November 2020, Government published its Position Statement which reflected on
the Call for Ideas and set out thinking on potential policy changes. In November 2021,
Draft NPF4 was laid in the Scottish Parliament. Alongside Parliamentary scrutiny of
the draft, a public consultation to invite comments on the content of the draft ran until
the end of March 2022. Planning Committee approved North Ayrshire Council’s input
into this process at meetings in March 2020, January 2021 and March 2022.   
2.3 A Revised Draft National Planning Framework was laid in the Scottish Parliament for
approval in November 2022, alongside a Delivery Programme, an Explanatory Report
that outlines the changes from Draft NPF4 to the Revised Draft and other supporting
documents and assessments. Parliament debated the Revised Draft on 11 January
2023 and voted to approve NPF4. Scottish Ministers moved to formally adopt and
publish NPF4 on 13 February 2023 at 9am. The provisions of the Planning (Scotland)
Act 2019 which amend the composition of the development plan have also been
commenced, making the National Planning Framework part of the development plan. 
2.4 NPF4 comprises two parts: A National Spatial Strategy for Scotland 2045 and National
Planning Policy: 
Part 1 – A National Spatial Strategy for Scotland 2045 
2.5  NPF4 puts the twin global climate and nature crises at the heart of a national spatial
strategy which seeks to maximise the potential of planning as a powerful tool for
delivering change on the ground in the long-term public interest. In doing so, the
strategy seeks to bring together competing interests to make the right choices about
where development should be located in the context of past, present and future
challenges. Future places are to be planned in accordance with six overarching spatial
principles of just transition; conserving and recycling assets; local living; compact
urban growth; rebalanced development and rural revitalisation. 
2.6 By applying these spatial principles, the national spatial strategy supports the planning
and delivery of sustainable, liveable and productive places which reduce emissions;
restore and better connect biodiversity; enable us to live better, healthier lives; and
create a greener, fairer and more inclusive wellbeing economy.
16

Page 17

2.7 NPF4 identifies National Developments to support the delivery of the spatial strategy.
National Developments are expected to act as exemplars of the place principle and
placemaking approaches and be designed and progressed in a way which supports
community wealth building. Designation as a National Development means that the
principle of the development does not need to be agreed in later consenting
processes, providing more certainty for communities, business and investors.
Hunterston has been designated as one of 18 national developments in total. Six of
the National Developments are Scotland-wide relating to the digital fibre network; a
national walking, cycling and wheeling network; facilities to support the Circular
Economy and renewable electricity and transmission infrastructure. The Central
Scotland Green Network, which extends to North Ayrshire, is also retained as a
National Development. 
2.8 North Ayrshire Council, as set out in the Adopted Local Development Plan – alongside
Scottish Enterprise and port owners Peels Ports – have promoted the designation of
Hunterston as a National Development within the NPF4.  The designation supports the
repurposing of Hunterston with the location and infrastructure identified as offering
potential for electricity generation from renewables, and a variety of commercial uses
including port, research and development, aquaculture, the circular economy, and
environmental and economic opportunities around nuclear decommissioning
expertise. Following submissions from NAC in response to Draft NPF4, the spatial
extent of the National Development has been expanded and is defined as Hunterston
Port, nuclear power station sites and marketable employment land at Hunterston
Estate.   
2.9 In recognition the diversity of character, assets and challenges across the country the
spatial strategy will be taken forward in different ways across Scotland. To guide this,
NPF4 identifies regional spatial priorities for five broad regions. North Ayrshire sits
within the Central region where the focus is on climate change and responding to the
challenges of the pandemic, driving forward change to tackle inequalities and build a
new, greener, future for this part of the country. Although not identified as a National
Development, NPF4 does recognise the Ardeer peninsula as a significant site for
redevelopment of the wider Ayrshire area within the context of targeting economic
investment and building community wealth to overcome disadvantage and support a
greener wellbeing economy. As intimated in LDP2, the future development including
the environmental and infrastructure capacity of Ardeer will be considered in the
preparation of LDP3. 
2.10 Our representations on the Draft NPF4 highlighted that North Ayrshire’s location within
the Central region was not a good fit for our islands, Arran and Cumbrae, which it was
considered would be a better placed within the ‘north west and coast innovation’
action area, with a focus on making sustainable use of our coasts and islands to
sustain communities and pioneer investment in the blue economy. While not expressly
addressed within the final NPF, the principle of Action Areas has been refined. The
areas are refocused as Regional Spatial Priorities, with an emphasis on context,
challenges, priorities and delivery and the strategic diagram showing boundaries has
been removed to allow for flexibility in application. The Carbon Neutral Island project
on Great Cumbrae is now specifically referenced within the renamed ‘North and West
Coast and Islands’ area. 
17

Page 18

Part 2 – National Planning Policy 
2.11 NPF4 incorporates updated Scottish Planning Policy which contains detailed national
policy on a number of themes. For the first time, spatial and thematic planning policies
are brought together in one place at a national level as part of the development plan.
Aligned with the creation of sustainable, liveable, productive places, NPF4 sets out 33
national planning policies. For each theme, the policy intent, outcomes, role of the
Local Development Plan and policy is provided, with the latter for use in the
determination of planning applications. Key policy connections and the spatial
principles the policy will deliver are also highlighted. Significant concern was
expressed at Draft stage that the wording of these policies was imprecise and lacked
robustness, for example stating development ‘should’ rather than ‘must’. This has
largely been addressed in the Adopted NPF4. 
2.12 In relation to the delivery of housing, The Planning (Scotland) Act, 2019 requires
Scottish Ministers, in preparing the National Planning Framework to include ‘targets
for the use of land in different areas for Scotland for housing’. This has been
addressed in NPF4 by the establishment of a ten-year Minimum All Tenure Housing
Land Requirement (MATHLR) for each planning authority. The MATHLR set for North
Ayrshire in Annex B is 2950 homes which is the minimum figure for new housing in the
Plan period. For reference, this compares to the target of 4071 homes between 2019-
2029 set out in LDP2. 
Delivery 
2.13 A key focus of planning reform is delivery, however, Draft NPF4 was not accompanied
by detailed proposals for delivering the spatial strategy. This has been addressed with
version 1 of the National Planning Framework 4 Delivery Programme published in
November 2022. The first Delivery Programme considered governance; delivery
mechanisms; infrastructure funding and finance; skills resources and performance;
and monitoring and evaluation before setting out a number of actions. To be updated
within six months and thereafter on an annual basis, the Delivery Programme
acknowledges the concerns raised over a lack of resources in terms of headcount and
skills to implement and support the delivery of NPF4. 
3. Proposals 
3.1 It is recommended that the Committee notes the adoption of National Planning
Framework 4 and that it is now part of the development plan for North Ayrshire. 
4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty 
Financial 
4.1 NPF4 is accompanied by a Final Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment (BIRA)
which identifies 14 areas of policy that may have a resourcing and skills impact on
planning authorities, for example through the requirement to consider new or
expanded policies, evidence or assessments. RTPI Scotland have stated the BRIA
has not fully considered the real-world costs of the revised NPF4 on planning
authorities and underestimates the potential for resourcing and skills impact.
Resourcing the planning system is likely to remain a key consideration with NPF4’s
18

Page 19

Delivery Programme. We anticipate that NPF 4 can be delivered within existing
budget. 
Human Resources 
4.2 See above, and note that we anticipate that NPF 4 can be delivered within existing
staff resources.
Legal 
4.3 National Planning Framework 4 forms part of the development plan for North Ayrshire,
in addition to the Adopted Local Development Plan (LDP2). Decisions on planning
applications must be made in accordance with the development plan unless material
consideration indicate otherwise. 
Equality/Socio-economic 
4.4 A number of statutory and non-statutory assessments have informed the preparation
of NPF4 and an Integrated Impact Assessment Report has been published alongside
the draft NPF4. These include a Strategic Environmental Assessment and Society
and Equalities Impact Assessment, incorporating an Equalities Impact Assessment
(EQIA), including human rights considerations, Child Rights & Wellbeing Impact
Assessment (CRWIA), Fairer Scotland Duty assessment (FSD) and Island
Communities Impact Assessment. 
Environmental and Sustainability 
4.5 See above. 
Key Priorities 
4.6 NPF4 aligns with wider national priorities, programmes and strategies, including on
infrastructure and economic investment. These align with many the Council’s key
priorities, including a sustainable environment; affordable, modern and well-designed
homes; and effective infrastructure. 
Community Wealth Building 
4.7 References to Community Wealth Building are made throughout NPF4. This includes
Policy 25 that seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate a ‘new strategic approach to
economic development that also provides a practical model for building a wellbeing
economy at local, regional and national levels’ by supporting local economic
development that focuses on community and place benefits as a central and primary
consideration. 
5. Consultation 
5.1 A comprehensive engagement programme has informed the preparation of the
National Planning Framework, including three rounds of consultation: Call for Ideas
19

Page 20

(2020), Position Statement (2020) and Draft NPF4 (2021). Planning Committee
approved North Ayrshire Council’s input into this process at these stages. 
RUSSELL McCUTCHEON
Executive Director (Place) 
For further information please contact Alistair Gemmell, Strategic Planning Manager, on
01294 324021. 
Background Papers
Adopted National Planning Framework 4 and supporting documents
Approved NPF4 | Transforming Planning
20

Page 21

NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 
22 February 2023 
Planning Report Committee 
Title: Grouping of Trees adjacent to Wildcat Lane and Summerlea
Road, West Kilbride 
Purpose: To seek Committee approval regarding the Confirmation of a
Tree Preservation Order (TPO) for a group of trees located along
Wildcat Road and Summerlea Road, West Kilbride.   
Recommendation: That the Committee confirms a Tree Preservation Order (TPO)
under S.160 1997 Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act in
the interests of protecting public amenity.   
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 This report updates members on the process of creating a Tree Preservation Order
(TPO) on a grouping of Trees along Wildcat Road and Summerlea Road in West
Kilbride.   The TPO, which was created in September 2022 following the approval from
the Planning Committee, was subject to a public consultation period in line with relevant
legalisation. The report summarises the representations made and makes
recommendations on further action, upon consideration of those representations. 
1.2 After analysing the representations received, it is recommended that the TPO is
confirmed unmodified as the grouping of trees contribute to wider public amenity.   
2. Background 
2.1 The Planning Committee on 28 September 2022 agreed to serve a Tree Preservation
Order (TPO) along Wildcat Road (sometimes referred to as Wildcat Lane) and
Summerlea Road in West Kilbride.  Committee was advised at that meeting that the
Council is required to confirm a TPO within 6 months of the Order being created
following a consultation period of no less than 28 days.   
2.2 Prior to the September Committee, independent analysis from an Arboricultural
specialist was undertaken to determine the suitability of a TPO on the grouping of trees. 
It concluded that there was merit in creating a TPO due to the contribution the trees
make to public amenity.  The analysis separated the trees into two distinct groupings
referred to as Compartment 1 which mainly adjoined Summerlea Road and
Compartment 2 which mainly adjoined either side of Wildcat Road.   
2.2 During the consultation period, notice was served on interested parties and an advert
was placed in the local newspaper.  A consultation period of 28 days started from the
Agenda Item 4
21

Page 22

date of the notice (7 October 2022) which attracted three letters of representation (two
of objection and one of support). 
3. Representations 
3.1 The representations are summarised below with the Officer’s response.   
3.2 Persimmon Homes objected to the creation of a TPO on several grounds including: 
• In compartment 2, the creation of a TPO is not required for the trees
as they are not at risk
• Should the TPO be created, compartment 1 should be excluded as it
would be more appropriate to protect the trees via a planning
condition to be included in planning application reference
21/01174/PPM.  
• The trees in Compartment 1 are not of sufficient health to be
protected as per the representees own assessment which was made
as part of their planning application submission.
• The representee has concerns over public safety and amenity (via
lighting) and the potential additional time it would take to maintain the
trees to protect public safety.   
3.3 Response: the representation is noted.  It is considered at that the trees should be
considered for protection under the criteria listed in S.160 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, namely (a) that it is expedient in the interests of amenity
to make that provision and (b) that the trees, groups of trees or woodlands are of
cultural or historical significance. It is noted that the independent analysis notes the risk
to the trees.  However, the decision was made by officers to assess the analyse the
trees on their own merit.  To determine expediency, it was noted that the independent
report states that the woodland as a whole has a “moderate to high amenity value”.  In
response to concerns regarding the health of the trees, the independent report states
that the trees in compartment 1 contain dense ivy and show presence of fungal
pathogen tar-spot. However, the analysis also notes that this disease of the foliage is of
little agricultural concern and all the trees in compartment 1 “display normal vitality”.   
3.4 The concerns over public safety and amenity are noted.  However, should there be any
immediate risk to public safety, the legislation allows emergency works to take place to
trees without permission from the Council if they were protected via a TPO.  Some
routine maintenance is also be permitted without gaining consent from the Council. 
3.5 It is accepted that the potential adding of a planning condition may offer some
protection to the trees in the future.  However, this was considered an undesirable
option when determining the suitability of a TPO.  Reasons for this include that a
planning condition may not offer sufficient protection after any consented development
takes place.  A TPO would ensure that the trees are protected whatever future land use
occupies nearby sites.  It is also noted that the trees have been considered as whole
and any planning condition would only apply to that within the boundary of any future
planning consent.   
3.6 Brisbane Glen Estates Company LTD objects to the creation of a TPO in this instance
22

Page 23

for the following reasons: 
• For compartment 1 - The representee quotes the Informed Tree Services
report, which states that if planning consent is not granted for the adjoining
field of Summerlea Road and Wildcat Road, then it would not be expedient to
create a TPO and that if the consent was granted then the trees could be
protected via carefully worded planning condition.  
• For compartment 2 – the trees in compartment 2 do not form part the
proposed development and will remain in the ownership of the representee. 
The representee further states that the trees require regular maintenance
due to the nature of the site being close to a main Scottish Water Drain.  To
carry out this management will lead to “extra bureaucratic delays” being
imposed.  The representation also highlighted that compartment 2 was
located on the North Ayrshire Core Paths Network. 
3.7 Response: It is considered that the trees should be assessed against the criteria set in
relevant legislation to determine the suitability of a TPO.  Therefore, the suitability of a
TPO should be assessed against the value of trees on their own merit and in their
current context.  The issue of using a planning condition to protect the trees is
responded to in para. 3.5.  With regards to delays, it is accepted that some works will
now be subject to gaining permission from the Council as the Planning Authority.  As
stated above, should there be an immediate risk to public safety, then the responsible
person can carry out appropriate works to ensure trees are made safe.  With regards to
planned maintenance, it is not considered that it would be a significant burden to seek
consent from the Council as part of the wider management of the trees.  Advice and
support is available from the Council, either by visiting the Council’s webpage or by
contacting the Planning Services team.     
3.8 A member of the public submitted a response via an elected Member of the Council. 
The resident suggested that the submitted tree survey that was conducted as part of
planning application reference 21/01174/PPM should be considered as it contains
valuable information regarding trees which are worthy of protection but not included in
the area included within the newly created TPO.   A tree of particular concern that the
responder feels should be protected is located where Summerlea Road and the A78
meet.  The responder also notes that there are many other trees in the area that should
be part of the Tree Protection Order including trees that border Summerlea Road and
Merlewood Road and then on to Fullerton Drive towards the coast.   
3.9 Response: The response is noted and the overall support for the creation of the TPO is
welcomed.  It is accepted that there are trees in the vicinity of the TPO which may also
contribute to the amenity of the area and are useful landscape features of this part of
West Kilbride. With regards to the survey that was conducted as part of the planning
application submission, it is accepted that the survey of trees relating to that proposed
development provides some useful information. However, the report and assessment
was conducted in a manner to satisfy the requirements of submitting a planning
application as opposed to the analysis procured by the Council which was carried out
solely with gaining an opinion on the suitability of a Tree Preservation Order.   It is
accepted that there is potential for nearby trees to contribute to public amenity. 
However, in this instance, the trees highlighted by the resident are considered to be
more fragmented than the proposed TPO and the relationship between the trees
proposed.  If it was considered that these additional trees should be protected, then a
23

Page 24

further TPO would be required.  It is considered that creating a TPO as originally
proposed would be the most appropriate course of action at this time.   
4. Proposals 
4.1 It is proposed that the Council confirms the Tree Preservation Order unmodified in
recognition of the significant contribution the trees and woodland make to public
amenity. 
24

Page 25

5. Implications/Socio-economic Duty
Financial
5.1  None. The TPO can be confirmed within existing budgets. 
Human Resources 
5.2  None. The TPO can be confirmed within existing staff resources.   
Legal 
5.3  Should a TPO be confirmed, a notice is required to be written and recorded in the          
Scottish Land Register. 
Equality/Socio-economic 
5.4  Assessments carried out highlight impact on wider public amenity.   
Climate Change and Carbon 
5.5   Trees can make a contribute to carbon sequestration, removing Carbon Dioxide from
the Earth’s atmosphere.   
Key Priorities 
5.6  The proposed TPO would align with the Council Plan Priorities of ‘Vibrant, welcoming
and attractive places’ and ‘A sustainable environment’ 
Community Wealth Building 
5.7  None. 
6 Consultation 
6.1  Consultation was carried out as required under the relevant legislation.  The comments
received were summarised in this report.   
James Miller
Chief Planning Officer 
For further information please contact Thom Ledingham, Planning Officer,
on 01294324623. 
Background Papers
0
25

Page 26

26

Page 27

NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL                                                                            
22 February 2023 
Planning Committee Report
Title: Grouping of Trees Located at Stevenston High Kirk and
Manse
Purpose: To advise Committee regarding the process and merits of
protecting a group of trees located on the grounds of Stevenston
High Kirk and the adjacent Manse. 
Recommendation: That the Council serves a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) under
S.160 1997 Town and Country Planning Act.   
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 This report is in response to a request made by a member of the public to assess
whether a grouping of trees in and around the grounds of Stevenston High Kirk should
be subject to formal protection via a Tree Preservation Order (TPO). 
1.2 It is considered that the trees meet the criteria for a Tree Preservation Order (TPO),
and it is recommended that a TPO is served in the interests of protecting public amenity
and cultural heritage. This report outlines the reasons for this recommendation and the
procedures involved. 
2. Background 
2.1 Concerns have been raised from a member of the public that there is currently a lack of
protection for trees located within the grounds of Stevenston High Kirk and adjoining
Manse. Following receipt of this request, Council Officers conducted a site visit and
desk top analysis to assess the suitability of a Tree Preservation Order and relevant
legislation. 
2.2   The Council as the Planning Authority has the power under sc160 of the Town and
Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended by the Planning etc 2006
(Scotland) Act) to make an order specifying any trees, groups of trees or woodlands in
their district and providing for their preservation. The Council can exercise these
powers providing the tree (or grouping of trees) meets either or both the following
requirements: 
(a) that it is expedient in the interests of amenity to make that provision,
(b) that the trees, groups of trees or woodlands are of cultural or historical significance.
Agenda Item 5
27

Page 28

It should be noted that under the legislation, a TPO can not be served due to the trees
being at risk alone. The only two criteria in which a Planning Authority can create a
provision are the two above. 
2.3   Following a preliminary assessment of the trees, it was considered that the trees add to
the Local Landscape Character and contribute to amenity. It was also noted that the
trees are located mostly in the grounds of Stevenston High Kirk, a Category B-Listed
church and cemetery which is still in regular use. The site is also designated in the
Local Development Plan as Open Space. Further considerations included the
existence of a Core Path located East of the Kirk which leads to the Town Centre, then
down to the Coast. 
2.4 Following the desktop assessment, Council Officers, including the Arboricultural
Officer, conducted a site visit to determine whether the trees and woodland have the
potential to meet the criteria for formal protection. Numerous trees species were
recorded within the grounds including Sweet Chestnut, Beech, Norway Maple, Lime,
Larch, Hawthorn, and Willow to name a few. A particular tree of note is a Tulip Tree
found within the rear garden of the Manse. These types of trees are normally only
found within botanical gardens, and it is likely to be the only specimen found in
Stevenston. It is evident that some of the trees are requiring some maintenance,
however they are considered to be of reasonable health for their age and location. 
2.5 Attention now turns to the criteria for creating TPOs. With regards to contribution to
public amenity, it is clear the trees contribute significantly to amenity. The trees are
visible from various parts of Stevenston including from the cross at the town centre.
The Kirk itself is a prominent building within the setting of the town and it is considered
that the trees form an important backdrop. The nearby Core Path acts as a key link
from many households to the town centre and the coast. The Kirk, with its backdrop of
trees plays a key role in providing a pleasant setting along this section. 
2.6 With regards to cultural and historical heritage, the grounds and building itself are
important to cultural and historical heritage and a working church, B-Listed building,
and cemetery. The contribution the trees make to that heritage is considered
significant. From the arrival to the church, the trees and green infrastructure are
considered to be a large part of the experience of visiting this area.   When arriving at
the church from the north, the trees create a welcoming avenue that leads to the
church and manse and provides screening from the car park to the A738. The trees
also add tranquillity to the experience of visiting the church and cemetery an important
function, when considering the current land use. 
2.7 Consideration was also given to including the wider allocated Open Space that
includes land either side adjacent to Stevenston Burn within the proposed TPO. It is
considered that while this area contributes to public amenity, it is under active
management by, and ownership of the Council, and not expedient to have formal
protection in place. In terms of trees and woodland, this area is also slightly more
sporadic in nature and not as significant a feature as within the are proposed for the
Order. 
2.8 Taking the above into account, it is considered that the trees meet the criteria for a
28

Page 29

Tree Protection Order. The trees contribute significantly to public amenity and
contribute significantly to the site being of cultural and historical importance. 
2.9   The legislation states that a Tree Preservation Order may, in particular, make
provision—
(a) for prohibiting (subject to any exemptions for which provision may be made by the
order) the cutting down, topping, lopping, uprooting, wilful damage, or wilful destruction
of trees except with the consent of the planning authority, and for enabling that
authority to give their consent subject to conditions.
(b) for securing the replanting, in such manner as may be prescribed by or under the
order, of any part of a woodland area which is felled in the course of forestry operations
permitted by or under the order.
(c) for applying, in relation to any consent under the order, and to applications for such
consent, any of the provisions of the 1997 Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act. 
2.10 The Town and Country Planning (Tree Preservation Order and Trees in Conservation
Areas) (Scotland) Regulations 2010 outlines the procedures in which Planning
Authorities can exercise their powers. If the Council serves a TPO, it is required to be
confirmed within 6 months of the date of that notice. Within this time, all interested
parties such as Landowners, Occupiers and Lessees must be notified and given a time
to respond to the notice of no less than 28 days. The notice is required to be advertised
locally in the relevant newspapers that serve the area. 
2.11  The six-month period would allow the Council to consult with stakeholders and gain
direction from Committee on whether to confirm the TPO (or amend it) and put it in
place in perpetuity. 
2.12 It should be noted that protection of the trees via a TPO does not provide absolute
protection to all the trees on the site. Protection via a TPO only means that permission
is required to cut down, top, lop, uproot trees from the Council. Should the removal of
trees be part of any future planning consent, then that would supersede the TPO.
Should a TPO be created however, then the impacts upon the trees may become a
material consideration when determining a planning application. 
2.13 The Council’s Sustainability, Transport and Corporate Property service is currently
required to maintain the ground of the Kirk and cemetery. There are proposals to carry
29

Page 30

out some works to the trees within the cemetery after it was discovered that some of
the trees are either of poor health, or are causing an obstruction to the boundary walls,
resulting in concern for public safety. Should the desired works take place following the
creation of the TPO, then consent would be required from the Council as the Planning
Authority. These works, as currently proposed, are considered to be minor when
considering the site as a whole and would not comprise the suitability of the TPO. 
Once planned works are confirmed, the Council will liaise with relevant colleagues to
ensure that the trees are given due protection and consideration in line with legislation. 
3. Proposals 
3.1 It is proposed that the Council serves notice of a Tree Preservation Order in the interests
of public amenity and cultural heritage. It is then proposed that Council will seek the views
of stakeholders and advertise the notice in the local newspapers. 
3.2  Once the Tree Preservation Order has been created. The Council has 6 months to
confirm the TPO when the Order will be placed within the Scottish Land Register. 
30

Page 31

4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty
Financial
4.1 None. The TPO can be created and advertised within existing budgets. 
Human Resources 
4.2 None. The TPO can be created and advertised within existing staff resources. 
Legal 
4.3 Should a TPO be confirmed, a notice is required to be written and recorded in the
Scottish Land Register. 
Equality/Socio-economic 
4.4 Trees can have numerous benefits for those seeking tranquillity. The grounds the
trees are locates in, play a significant role in society and are part of a community that
use the church and the grounds. 
Climate Change and Carbon 
4.5 Trees can have positive impacts on the climate through carbon sequestration. 
Key Priorities 
4.6 The proposed TPO would align with the Council Plan Priorities of ‘Vibrant, welcoming,
and attractive places’ and ‘A sustainable environment.’ 
Community Wealth Building 
4.7 None. 
5. Consultation 
5.1 Consultation is required with landowners, occupiers and lessees and published in a local
paper with at least 28 days given for response 
RUSSELL McCUTCHEON
Executive Director (Place) 
For further information please contact Thom Ledingham, Planning Officer (Strategic
Planning),
on 01294 324 623 
Background Papers
Appendix 1 – Proposed Tree Preservation Order 
31

Page 32

32

Page 33

NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 
22nd February 2023 
Planning Committee 
Title:    Notice under Section 127 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997: Tennox Farm, Kilbirnie 
Purpose:  To seek authority to serve notices under Section 127 of the Town
and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 requiring:
1. the removal of the unauthorised dwellinghouse, associated
outbuildings and ancillary works at Tennox Farm which was
refused planning permission under reference 22/00331/PP;
2. The restoration of the land within the boundary of the site (ref.
22/00331/PP) to its former condition prior to the development
taking place. 
Recommendation:  That the Committee grants authority for the service of a Notice
under Section 127 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland)
Act 1997 requiring the removal of the unauthorised
dwellinghouse, associated outbuildings and ancillary works at
Tennox Farm (ref. 22/00331/PP) and the restoration of the land
to its former condition prior to the development taking place 
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 The Council has received a number of reports in recent years that land at Tennox Farm
near Kilbirnie has been developed with a number of unauthorised buildings as well as
formation of a large yard area. 
1.2 An enforcement notice under Section 33A of the Act was served on the owner of the
land in March 2022. Among other matters, the notice required the submission of a
planning application in respect of a dwellinghouse and ancillary outbuildings, the
construction of which took place during 2020/21.  
1.3 An application for the house was duly submitted, considered and refused planning
permission during 2022 under ref. 22/00331/PP.   
1.4 A review of the decision was undertaken by the Local Review Body of the Council on
25th January 2023. The review was dismissed. The consequence of the review decision
is that the development remains unauthorised. 
Agenda Item 6
33

Page 34

2. Background 
2.1 As noted above, an enforcement notice was served on the owner of Tennox Farm in
March 2022 in relation to unauthorised building works comprising of a dwellinghouse,
outbuildings and ancillary works. 
2.2  Whilst the notice also related to various other matters at Tennox Farm, this report
considers only matters relating to the erection of a dwellinghouse (under the terms of
planning application ref. 22/00331/PP). 
2.3  In response to the Section 33A Notice, served on 7th March 2022, an appeal was lodged
with Scottish Ministers by the owner of Tennox Farm. The appeal was duly considered
and dismissed by a Reporter appointed by Scottish Ministers on 22nd July 2022. 
2.4  To meet the terms of the Section 33A Notice, a planning application was submitted for
the consideration of the Council and subsequently determined by the Chief Planning
Officer under delegated powers on 6th September 2022. The application was refused
for the following reasons: 
1. The proposed development would be contrary to the provisions of the North
Ayrshire Local Development Plan Strategic Policy 1 (The Countryside Objective) in
respect of the following: 
- The locational need for a new house has not been established, given the presence
of other domestic buildings at Tennox Farm; 
- The site is not within an established grouping of at least 4 dwellings which existed
in January 2005; 
- The site is not a gap site between existing buildings, nor would the development
consolidate or round-off the established grouping, and the house has encroached
onto agricultural land beyond the original steading at Tennox; 
- In architectural terms, the design is not considered exceptional, bespoke nor site
specific in terms of the associated 'Housing in the Countryside Note' of June 2021. 
2. The proposed development would be contrary to the provisions of the North
Ayrshire Local Development Plan Strategic Policy 2 (Placemaking) in respect of the
following qualities of a Successful Place: 
Safe and Pleasant
The policy highlights that proposed development "sufficiently investigates and
responds to any issues of ground instability."  In response to the submitted risk
assessment report, significant concerns have been raised by The Coal Authority
due to historic coal working and transient mine gas. The suitability of the chosen
site for the house in terms of the health and safety of current and future occupants
is therefore inconclusive. 
Resource Efficient
The policy highlights that resource efficiencies can be achieved "by re-using or
sharing existing resources and by minimising their future depletion." With regard to
the submitted information, it does not appear that consideration has been given to
34

Page 35

re-using or sharing existing building resources at Tennox to meet the applicant's
requirements for on-site accommodation to manage the business enterprises. The
failure to consider alternatives at an early stage in the design process has resulted
in the erection of a dwellinghouse on previously undeveloped agricultural land
which cannot be supported in policy terms. 
2.5 At the request of the applicant, a review of the case was undertaken by the Local
Review Body. On 25th January 2023, the Local Review Body determined not to grant
planning permission following consideration of all matters pertaining to the review.
The consequence of the decision is that the development remains unauthorised. 
2.6  The Council’s LDP supports housing in the countryside only in exceptional
circumstances. As noted, Tennox Farm is within a rural area of North Ayrshire. The
impact of the unauthorised development of a dwellinghouse, outbuildings and ancillary
development on the land is considered to be harmful to the amenity of the
countryside, and contrary to the Local Development Plan, for the reasons given
above.   
2.7 Given the foregoing, it is recommended that authority for the service of a Notice under
Section 127 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as amended, (an
“Enforcement Notice”) be granted. An Enforcement Notice would require the removal
of the unauthorised dwellinghouse, associated outbuildings and ancillary works within
the boundary of planning application site 22/00331/PP and restoration of the land to
its former condition prior to the development taking place. Such a Notice would take
effect not less than 35 days from the date on which it is served. There is a right of
appeal to Scottish Ministers within the period between the service of the Notice and
the date it becomes effective. 
3. Proposals 
3.1 In the interest of the amenity of the area and to remove inappropriate unauthorised
development from a rural area (development which, following assessment, is contrary
to Strategic Policy 1: The Countryside Objective and Strategic Policy 2: Placemaking),
it is recommended that the Committee approve the service of a Notice under Section
127 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 to require the following: 
(i) The removal of the unauthorised dwellinghouse, associated outbuildings and
ancillary works within the boundary of planning application site 22/00331/PP
and restoration of the land to its former condition prior to the development
taking place. 
3.2 In these circumstances, the timescale for compliance with the notice should be no
greater than 6 months from the date of service. 
4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty 
35

Page 36

Financial 
4.1 Serving Enforcement Notices can be met from within existing budgetary provision of
the Planning Service. 
Human Resources 
4.2 Serving Enforcement Notices can be met from within existing staff resources of the
Planning Service. 
Legal 
4.3 The proposed Enforcement Notice would be served in accordance with statutory
procedures. There is a right of appeal to Scottish Ministers. Non-compliance with an
Enforcement Notice is an offence which the Council could report to the Procurator
Fiscal. 
Equality/Socio-economic 
4.4 None. 
Environmental and Sustainability 
4.5 The proposed Enforcement Notice would help to address the ongoing matter of
unauthorised development and use of land at Tennox Farm, Kilbirnie in the interests
of safeguarding the amenity of North Ayrshire’s rural area. 
Key Priorities 
4.6 The proposed Enforcement Notices would align with the Council Plan Priorities of
‘Vibrant, welcoming and attractive places’ and ‘A sustainable environment’. 
Community Wealth Building 
4.7 Any direct action taken under the Planning Acts can support progressive procurement. 
5. Consultation 
5.1 None. 
RUSSELL McCUTCHEON
Executive Director (Place) 
For further information please contact Mr A. Hume, Senior Development Management
Officer, on 01294 324318. 
Background Papers
0
36

Page 37

Drain
Pond
Wind Pump
Heap (dis)
Tennox Farm House
Tennox Old Stable
Tennox Old Parlour
®
0 60 12030 Metres
1:2,500
Notice under Section 127 of the Town and
Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997:
Tennox Farm, Kilbirnie
"This map is reproduced from the OS map by North Ayrshire Council with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown
copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: 100023393."
37

Page 38

38