Democracy Spraffa

Update on Recent Scottish Government Planning Appeal Decision

Argyll and Bute Council · 22 May 2024
Back to Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee — 22 May 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Argyll and Bute Council 
Development and Economic Growth 
PLANNING, PROTECTIVE SERVICES AND LICENSING COMMITTEE – 22nd May 2024 
_________________________________________________________________________ 
UPDATE ON RECENT SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT PLANNING APPEAL DECISION 
22/00678/PPP – Site West of Ruanda, Shore Road, Peaton, Argyll and Bute 
_________________________________________________________________________ 
(A) INTRODUCTION 
This report summarises a recent decision by Scottish Ministers following the above
application being appealed. 
(B) RECOMMENDATION 
It is recommended that Members note the content of this report. 
(C) BACKGROUND – 22/00678/PPP 
This report refers to planning application reference 22/00678/PP for the erection of a
dwelling house in principle and formation of a new access at a site West of Ruanda,
Shore Road, Peaton on the Rosneath peninsula within Helensburgh and Lomond area. 
Planning permission was refused at Planning, Protective Services and Licensing
Committee on the 23rd of November 2023 due a number of reasons including the house
not being in keeping with the settlement pattern, part of the development (the access)
being outside the settlement area, the impact on the undeveloped coast and finally the
impact on biodiversity and woodland.  The proposal would have resulted in an
unacceptable development contrary to NPF4 Policies 3, 6, 19 and 14 and also LDP2
Policies 01, 02, 04, 05, 08, 10, 28, 73 and 77. 
An appeal was subsequently submitted to the Planning and Environmental Appeals
Division (PEAD).   
SCOTTISH MINISTERS’ DECISION 
Scottish Ministers dismissed the appeal and concluded that the planning permission
should be refused.   
In summary the key points are as follows: 
- Settlement Pattern – the assessment found that the predominant settlement pattern
on the western shore is of large, detached homes on the landward side of the road,
with minimal shorefront development. Then they go on to conclude that the existing
settlement pattern and character of Peaton itself would not be respected, and that
the character of the settlement would be detrimentally altered by the appeal
proposal. Development on the shore side of Shore Road appears to be the
exception, and not the dominant development pattern in this area.

Page 2

- Development Outside Settlement Area – it is concluded that the access as currently
proposed would not meet the required visibility splays and sightlines on the B833
Shore Road and it would introduce a built element into the countryside. 
- Coastal Development – the assessment agrees that the site is on a stretch of
undeveloped coast, although within the settlement area. It states that there would be
an adverse impact on views from sea to land, as the setting of Peaton would be
detrimentally altered with the introduction of a new dwelling on the shore, which
would be out of keeping with the established character of the settlement. 
- Biodiversity – the assessment states that even though a preliminary appraisal has
been submitted to support the proposal, it does not indicate measures to
demonstrate biodiversity enhancement, nor does it demonstrate that there would be
no impact on habitats. 
- Woodland – the assessment concludes, that following the site inspection, it difficult
to envisage how any development could take place without the removal of trees to
facilitate the required access, visibility splays, parking and garden areas. 
Therefore, every reason for refusal was upheld and it was considered contrary to the
provisions of NPF4 and LDP2. 
Full details of the appeal documents and decision can be viewed on the PEAD website
under the reference PPA-130-2088: 
Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk) 
(D) IMPLICATIONS 
Policy: None 
Financial: None
Personnel: None 
Equal Opportunities: None 
Authors and Contact Officer: Kirsty Sweeney 
Fergus Murray 
Head of Development and Economic Growth