Democracy Spraffa

Kilbirnie, Stoneyhold Reports and Apps 1 - 4

North Ayrshire Council · 8 June 2022
Back to Local Review Body — 8 June 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 
8 June 2022 
Local Review Body 
Title:    Notice of Review:   21/01036/PP - 48 Stoneyholm Road,
Kilbirnie
Purpose:  To submit, for consideration of the Local Review Body, a Notice of
Review by the applicant in respect of a planning application
refused by officers under delegated powers.
Recommendation:  That the Local Review Body considers the Notice of Review. 
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 The Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as amended by the Planning
(Scotland) Act 2006, provides for certain categories of planning application for "local"
developments to be determined by appointed officers under delegated powers.  Where
such an application is refused, granted subject to conditions or not determined within
the prescribed period of 2 months, the applicant may submit a Notice of Review to
require the Planning Authority to review the case.  Notices of Review in relation to
refusals must be submitted within 3 months of the date of the Decision Notice. 
2. Background 
2.1 A Notice of Review was submitted in respect of Planning Application 21/01036/PP -
48 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie for the formation of dormer windows to the front and
rear of detached dwelling house at that address. 
2.2 The application was refused by officers for the reasons detailed in the Decision
Notice. 
2.3 The following related documents are set out in the appendices to the report: - 
Appendix 1 -  Notice of Review documentation;
Appendix 2 -  Report of Handling;
Appendix 3 -  Location Plan; and
Appendix 4 -  Planning Decision Notice. 
3. Proposals 
3.1 The Local Review Body is invited to consider the Notice of Review.

Page 2

4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty 
Financial 
4.1 None arising from the recommendation of this report. 
Human Resources 
4.2 None arising from the recommendation of this report. 
Legal 
4.3 The Notice of Review requires to be considered in terms of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as amended by the Planning (Scotland) Act 2006, and
the Town and Country Planning (Schemes of Delegation and Local Review Procedure)
(Scotland) Regulations 2013. 
Equality/Socio-economic 
4.4 None arising from the recommendation of this report. 
Environmental and Sustainability 
4.5 None arising from the recommendation of this report. 
Key Priorities 
4.6 None arising from the recommendation of this report. 
Community Benefits 
4.7 None arising from the recommendation of this report. 
5. Consultation 
5.1 Interested parties (both objectors to the planning application and statutory consultees)
were invited to submit representations in terms of the Notice of Review and no further
representations were received.   
Craig Hatton
Chief Executive 
For further information please contact Angela Little, Committee Services Officer, on
01294 324132. 
Background Papers
0

Page 3

Page 1 of 5
Cunninghame House Friars Croft Irvine KA12 8EE  Email: eplanning@north-ayrshire.gov.uk
Applications cannot be validated until all the necessary documentation has been submitted and the required fee has been paid.
Thank you for completing this application form:
ONLINE REFERENCE 100490994-002
The online reference is the unique reference for your online form only. The  Planning Authority will allocate an Application Number when
your form is validated. Please quote this reference if you need to contact the planning Authority about this application.
Applicant or Agent Details
Are you an applicant or an agent? * (An agent is an architect, consultant or someone else acting
on behalf of the applicant in connection with this application)  Applicant  Agent
Agent Details
Please enter Agent details
Company/Organisation:
Ref. Number: You must enter a Building Name or Number, or both: *
First Name: * Building Name:
Last Name: * Building Number:
Address 1
Telephone Number: * (Street): *
Extension Number: Address 2:
Mobile Number: Town/City: *
Fax Number: Country: *
Postcode: *
Email Address: *
Is the applicant an individual or an organisation/corporate entity? *
  Individual    Organisation/Corporate entity
Ayrshire Architecture
Ayrshire
Architecture
United Kingdom
Irvine
Appendix  1

Page 4

Page 2 of 5
Applicant Details
Please enter Applicant details
Title: You must enter a Building Name or Number, or both: *
Other Title: Building Name:
First Name: * Building Number:
Address 1
Last Name: * (Street): *
Company/Organisation Address 2:
Telephone Number: * Town/City: *
Extension Number: Country: *
Mobile Number: Postcode: *
Fax Number:
Email Address: *
Site Address Details
Planning Authority:
Full postal address of the site (including postcode where available):
Address 1: 
Address 2:
Address 3:
Address 4:
Address 5:
Town/City/Settlement:
Post Code:
Please identify/describe the location of the site or sites
Northing Easting
Mr
48 STONEYHOLM ROAD
Colin
North Ayrshire Council
Clark Stoneyholm Road
48
KILBIRNIE
KA25 7JS
KA25 7JS
Scotland
654786
Kilbirnie
232013

Page 5

Page 3 of 5
Description of Proposal
Please provide a description of your proposal to which your review relates. The description should be the same as given in the
application form, or as amended with the agreement of the planning authority: *
(Max 500 characters)
Type of Application
What type of application did you submit to the planning authority? *
  Application for planning permission (including householder application but excluding application to work minerals).
  Application for planning permission in principle.
  Further application.
  Application for approval of matters specified in conditions.
What does your review relate to? *
  Refusal Notice.
 Grant of permission with Conditions imposed.
  No decision reached within the prescribed period (two months after validation date or any agreed extension) – deemed refusal.
Statement of reasons for seeking review
You must state in full, why you are a seeking a review of the planning authority’s decision (or failure to make a decision). Your statement
must set out all matters you consider require  to be taken into account in determining your review. If necessary this can be provided as a
separate document in the ‘Supporting Documents’ section: *  (Max 500 characters)
Note: you are unlikely to have a further opportunity to add to your statement of appeal at a later date, so it is essential that you produce
all of the information you want the decision-maker to take into account.
You should not however raise any new matter which was not before the planning authority at the time it decided your application (or at
the time expiry of the period of determination), unless you can demonstrate that the new matter could not have been raised before that
time or that it not being raised before that time is a consequence of exceptional circumstances.
Have you raised any matters which were not before the appointed officer  at the time the  Yes   No
Determination on your application was made? *
If yes, you should explain in the box below, why you are raising the new matter, why it was not raised with the appointed officer before
your application was determined and why you consider it should be considered in your review: * (Max 500 characters)
Formation of dormer windows to front and rear of detached dwelling house
We are seeking a review of the Planning Authority's decision because we think that the application does accord with the current
North Ayrshire Local Plan requirements and have outlined why in the attached supporting statement

Page 6

Page 4 of 5
Please provide a list of all supporting documents, materials and evidence which you wish to submit with your notice of review and intend
to rely on in support of your review. You can attach these documents electronically later in the process: * (Max 500 characters)
Application Details
Please provide the application reference no. given to you by your planning
authority for your previous application.
What date was the application submitted to the planning authority? *
What date was the decision issued by the planning authority? *
Review Procedure
The Local Review Body will decide on the procedure to be used to determine your review and may at any time during the review
process require that further information or representations be made to enable them to determine the review. Further information may be
required by one or a combination of procedures, such as: written submissions; the holding of one or more hearing sessions and/or
inspecting the land which is the subject of the review case.
Can this review continue to a conclusion, in your opinion, based on a review of the relevant information provided by yourself and other
parties only,  without any further procedures? For example, written submission, hearing session, site inspection. *
 Yes   No
In the event that the Local Review Body appointed to consider your application decides to inspect the site, in your opinion:
Can the site be clearly seen from a road or public land? *  Yes   No
Is it possible for the site to be accessed safely and without barriers to entry? *  Yes    No
If there are reasons why you think the local Review Body would be unable to undertake an unaccompanied site inspection, please
explain here.  (Max 500 characters)
supporting statement
21/01036/PP
18/02/2022
22/10/2021

Page 7

Page 5 of 5
Checklist – Application for Notice of Review
Please complete the following checklist to make sure  you have provided all the necessary information in support of your appeal. Failure
to submit all this  information may result in your appeal  being deemed invalid.
Have you provided the name and address of the applicant?.  *  Yes   No
Have you provided the date and reference number of the application which is the subject of this  Yes   No
review? *
If you are the agent, acting on behalf of the applicant, have you provided details of your name  Yes   No   N/A
and address and indicated whether any notice or correspondence required in connection with the
review should be sent to you or the applicant? *
Have you provided a statement setting out your reasons for requiring a review and by what  Yes   No
procedure (or combination of procedures) you wish the review to be conducted? *
Note: You must state, in full, why you are seeking a review on your application. Your statement must set out all matters you consider
require to be taken into account in determining your review. You may not have a further opportunity to add to your statement of review
at a later date. It is therefore essential that you submit with your notice of review, all necessary information and evidence that you rely
on and wish the Local Review Body to consider as part of your review.
Please attach a copy of all documents, material and evidence which you intend to rely on  Yes   No
(e.g. plans and Drawings) which are now the subject of this review *
Note: Where the review relates to a further application e.g. renewal of planning permission or modification, variation or removal of a
planning condition or where it relates to an application for approval of matters specified in conditions, it is advisable to provide the
application reference number, approved plans and decision notice (if any) from the earlier consent.
Declare – Notice of Review
I/We the applicant/agent certify that this is an application for review on the grounds stated.
Declaration Name: Mr Ayrshire Architecture
Declaration Date: 17/05/2022

Page 8

Ayrshire Architecture
Chartered Architectural Technologist 
Application for Notice of Review to Local Review Body 
Proposed Attic conversion with dormer extensions at 
48 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie
May 2022
Application for Notice of Review to Local Review Body 
for 
Proposed attic conversion with dormer extensions 
at 
48 Stoneyholm Road,
Kilbirnie 
for 
Mr & Mrs Clark 
Application Ref No: 21/01036/PP

Page 9

Ayrshire Architecture
Chartered Architectural Technologist 
Application for Notice of Review to Local Review Body 
Proposed Attic conversion with dormer extensions at 
48 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie
May 2022
INDEX 
1 Introduction 
2 Reason for Refusal and Responses 
3 Photographs 
4 Summary

Page 10

Ayrshire Architecture
Chartered Architectural Technologist 
Application for Notice of Review to Local Review Body 
Proposed Attic conversion with dormer extensions at 
48 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie
May 2022
1 Introduction 
1.1 Mr & Mrs Clark instructed Ayrshire Architecture to prepare drawings and submit the
necessary applications for the proposed attic conversion with dormer extension and
associated alterations at 48 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie. 
1.2 The Site 
The property is a detached bungalow with a pitched roof with slates and the external
wall finish is wet dash render. 
1.3 Application 
An application was submitted on 22nd October 2021 and was validated on 9th
November 2021.  The application reference number is 21/01036/PP and was
allocated to Joseph Thomson, Assistant Planning Officer. 
On 9th December, Mr Thomson contacted Ayrshire Architecture regarding the
possibility of using a hipped roof dormer design, similar to other local properties, and
he included photographs giving examples of other properties in the local area. 
Following investigation, and consultation with Mr and Mrs Clark, Ayrshire Architecture
replied to Mr Thomson stating that the structure and height of the existing roof did not
allow the formation of pitched, hipped roof dormers and as such, could the
application be determined as it was submitted. 
The application was refused under delegated powers on 18th February 2022.

Page 11

Ayrshire Architecture
Chartered Architectural Technologist 
Application for Notice of Review to Local Review Body 
Proposed Attic conversion with dormer extensions at 
48 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie
May 2022
2 Reasons for Refusal and responses 
2.1 Reason 
By reason of their size and flat roof box design, the proposed dormer windows would
be contrary to the aims of the Strategic Policy 2 (Placemaking) of the adopted North
Ayrshire Local Plan. The stated aim of which is to ensure all development contributes
to making quality places.  The policy also seeks to safeguard, and where possible
enhance environmental quality through the avoidance of adverse environmental and
amenity impacts.  In this case, it is considered that the proposed dormers would be
out of character with the design of the dwellinghouses within the street, all to the
detriment of the character and amenity of the area. 
Response   
There are other examples of flat roofed dormers in Stoneyholm Road in particular
and Kilbirnie in general. The photographs in paragraph three show the dormers
mentioned.  The dormers in Stoneyholm Road are to the rear of No 18. The others
on Largs Road are on the front elevation and are in a very prominent location as you
enter the town from the west.  The proposed dormers in this application are of a
similar style to those shown in the photographs. 
The height of the existing roof and pitches of the hips limit the size of any dormers
and the requirement to use slates on any pitched roof dormer would mean that there
would not be enough space between the side walls to make the dormers viable.   
Given the scale, symmetry and setting of the proposed dormers in that they are not
overly large and do not look out of place on the streetscape, it is considered they are
not detrimental to the visual amenity of the area. 
As noted in the handling report, there were no objections from the neighbours who
had been notified. 
The cul de sac on which No 48 is sited is off the main part of Stoneyholm Road and
therefore less open to public view and this minimises any impact the dormers may
have on the general area. 
Mr & Mrs Clark have three children, two girls and a boy.  The proposals were to
create a better family home and more spacious living environment.  One of them has
an Autism Spectrum Disorder and this proposal would help create much needed
space to allow the children to have a bedroom each and allow them to be more
independent.

Page 12

Ayrshire Architecture
Chartered Architectural Technologist 
Application for Notice of Review to Local Review Body 
Proposed Attic conversion with dormer extensions at 
48 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie
May 2022
3 Photographs 
3.1 Photographs show examples of flat roofed dormers nearby in Stoneyholm Road and
in Largs Road, Kilbirnie. 
18 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie
Largs Road, Kilbirnie
Largs Road, KIlbirnie 
Largs Road, KIlbirnie

Page 13

Ayrshire Architecture
Chartered Architectural Technologist 
Application for Notice of Review to Local Review Body 
Proposed Attic conversion with dormer extensions at 
48 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie
May 2022 
4 Summary 
4.1 The examples mentioned above, together with the photographic examples, show that
the proposed dormer extensions would not be out of keeping or detrimental to the
visual amenity of the area and therefore would comply with the requirements of the
current North Ayrshire Local Development Plan. 
As a result of all the information detailed in this report, it is considered that the
application should be granted consent and the refusal decision overturned by the
Local Review Body.

Page 14

Appendix 2 
REPORT OF HANDLING 
Reference No:   21/01036/PP
Proposal: Formation of dormer windows to front and rear of
detached dwelling house  
Location: 48 Stoneyholm Road, Kilbirnie, Ayrshire, KA25
7JS 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LDP Allocation: General Urban Area
LDP Policies: Strategic Policy 2 / SP1 - Towns and Villages
Objective / 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations: None Undertaken  
Neighbour Notification: Neighbour Notification carried out on 10.11.2021 
Neighbour Notification expired on 01.12.2021 
Advert: Not Advertised  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous Applications: None 
Appeal History Of Site:     
Relevant Development Plan Policies 
Strategic Policy 2
Placemaking
Our Placemaking policy will ensure we are meeting LOIP priorities to make North
Ayrshire safer and healthier by ensuring that all development contributes to making
quality places.
The policy also safeguards, and where possible enhances environmental quality
through the avoidance of unacceptable adverse environmental or amenity impacts.
We expect that all applications for planning permission meet the six qualities of
successful places, contained in this policy. This is in addition to establishing the
principle of development in accordance with Strategic Policy 1: Spatial Strategy.
These detailed criteria are generally not repeated in the detailed policies section of
the LDP. They will apply, as appropriate, to all developments. 
Six qualities of a successful place 
Distinctive
The proposal draws upon the positive characteristics of the surrounding area
including landscapes, topography, ecology, skylines, spaces and scales, street and
building forms, and materials to create places with a sense of identity.

Page 15

21/01036/PP
Welcoming
The proposal considers the future users of the site and helps people to find their way
around, for example, by accentuating existing landmarks to create or improve views
(including sea views), locating a distinctive work of art in a notable place or making
the most of gateway features to and from the development. It should also ensure
that appropriate signage and lighting is used to improve safety and illuminate
attractive buildings.
Safe and Pleasant
The proposal creates attractive places by providing a sense of security, including by
encouraging activity, considering crime rates, providing a clear distinction between
private and public space, creating active frontages and considering the benefits of
natural surveillance for streets, paths and open spaces.
The proposal creates a pleasant, positive sense of place by promoting visual quality,
encouraging social and economic interaction and activity, and by considering the
place before vehicle movement.
The proposal respects the amenity of existing and future users in terms of noise,
privacy, sunlight/daylight, smells, vibrations, glare, traffic generation, and parking.
The proposal sufficiently investigates and responds to any issues of ground
instability. 
Adaptable
The proposal considers future users of the site and ensures that the design is
adaptable to their needs. This includes consideration of future changes of use that
may involve a mix of densities, tenures, and typologies to ensure that future diverse
but compatible uses can be integrated including the provision of versatile multi-
functional greenspace. 
Resource Efficient
The proposal maximises the efficient use of resources. This can be achieved by re-
using or sharing existing resources and by minimising their future depletion. This
includes consideration of technological and natural means such as flood drainage
systems, heat networks, solar gain, renewable energy and waste recycling as well
as use of green and blue networks. 
Easy to Move Around and Beyond
The proposal considers the connectedness of the site for people before the
movement of motor vehicles, by prioritising sustainable and active travel choices,
such as walking, cycling and public transport and ensuring layouts reflect likely
desire lines, through routes and future expansions. 
SP1 - Towns and Villages Objective
Towns and Villages Objective 
Our towns and villages are where most of our homes, jobs, community facilities,
shops and services are located. We want to continue to support our communities,
businesses and protect our natural environment by directing new development to
our towns and villages as shown in the Spatial Strategy. Within urban areas (within
the settlement boundary), the LDP identifies town centre locations, employment
locations and areas of open space. Most of the remaining area within settlements is
shown as General Urban Area. Within the General Urban Area, proposals for
residential development will accord with the development plan in principle, and
applications will be assessed against the policies of the LDP. New non-residential
proposals will be assessed against policies of this LDP that relate to the proposal.

Page 16

21/01036/PP
In principle, we will support development proposals within our towns and villages
that: 
a) Support the social and economic functions of our town centres by adopting a
town centre first principle that directs major new development and investment to
town centre locations as a priority including supporting town centre living.
b) Provide the right new homes in the right places by working alongside the
Local Housing Strategy to deliver choice and variety in the housing stock, protecting
land for housing development to ensure we address housing need and demand
within North Ayrshire and by supporting innovative approaches to improving the
volume and speed of housing delivery.
c) Generate new employment opportunities by identifying a flexible range of
business, commercial and industrial areas to meet market demands including those
that would support key sector development at Hunterston and i3, Irvine.
d) Recognise the value of our built and natural environment by embedding
placemaking into our decision-making. 
e) Prioritise the re-use of brownfield land over greenfield land by supporting a
range of strategic developments that will deliver:
o regeneration of vacant and derelict land through its sustainable and
productive re-use, particularly at Ardrossan North Shore, harbour and marina areas,
Montgomerie Park (Irvine) and Lochshore (Kilbirnie).
o regeneration and conservation benefits, including securing the productive re-
use of Stoneyholm Mill (Kilbirnie) and supporting the Millport Conservation Area
Regeneration Scheme.
f) Support the delivery of regional partnerships such as the Ayrshire Growth
Deal in unlocking the economic potential of the Ayrshire region. 
Description 
Planning permission is sought for the formation of dormer windows to the front and
rear of a detached dwelling house. The proposed dormer windows would facilitate
the conversion of attic space to form 2 no. new bedrooms. They would have a flat
roof design. Materials would consist of vertically hung slates to the dormer walls, to
match with the existing roof covering to the house, and white UPVC double glazed
windows. 
The application site is located at 48 Stoneyholm Road in Kilbirnie which consists of a
detached hipped roof bungalow with attic space and garden ground to the front and
rear, including access and off-street parking to the front. The attic has not previously
been converted to habitable accommodation. The site fronts onto Stoneyholm Road
to the west and is bounded by housing on all sides. 
The application site is located within the General Urban Area within the settlement
boundary of Kilbirnie as identified in the Adopted Local Development Plan (LDP).
Therefore, the Towns and Villages Objective of Strategic Policy 1 (Spatial Strategy)
applies. All applications for planning permission require to be considered in
accordance with Strategic Policy 2 (Placemaking). 
The determination of this application was delayed from the 9th December 2021 to
8th February 2022. This was due to a request from the case officer for amendments

Page 17

21/01036/PP
to the roof design of the proposed dormer windows. However, no revised drawings
were received.  The proposal therefore requires to be determined on the basis of the
original submission. 
Consultations and Representations 
Neighbour notification was carried out for this application in accordance with
statutory procedures. No representations were received in response to the
application. No consultations required to be undertaken. 
Analysis 
The erection of dormer windows to a domestic dwellinghouse does not give rise to
any land use policy implications and would be acceptable in principle in terms of the
Towns and Villages Objective of Strategic Policy 1 (Spatial Strategy). The
application therefore falls to be considered in accordance with Strategic Policy 2
(Placemaking). The stated purpose of Strategic Policy 2 on Placemaking is to
ensure "all development contributes to making quality places." The policy also seeks
to "safeguard, and where possible enhances environmental quality through the
avoidance of adverse environmental or amenity impacts." Strategic Policy 2
(Placemaking) identifies six qualities of a successful place which all applications for
planning permission are expected to meet. In this case, it is considered that the
'Distinctive', 'Safe and Pleasant', and 'Adaptable' qualities are most relevant. 
'Distinctive' 
Located to both the front and rear roof planes of the dwellinghouse, the proposed
dormer windows would be readily visible from public viewpoints on Stoneyholm
Road, particularly the front dormer. There are many examples of houses in the
surrounding area which have been extended by dormer windows. However, it should
be noted that existing dormer windows in the surrounding area have primarily
adopted either a gable fronted or hipped roof design. In this case, given the hipped
roof design of the main dwellinghouse, it is considered that a similar roof design
would be more appropriate than the flat roof box design as proposed. To the north of
the application site, there is an example of a hipped bungalow on Stoneyholm Road,
similar in design to 48 Stoneyholm Road, which has been extended to the front by a
dormer window with a hipped roof design. Therefore, at the request of the case
officer, amendments were sought for a revised roof design to the proposed dormer
windows in line with the above observations. However, the agent advised that the
structure and height of the existing roof do not allow for the formation of pitched,
hipped roofs on the proposed dormers. No revised drawings were received. 
It is noted that due to the relatively large scale of the proposed dormers that the
hipped roof, as sought by the case officer, cannot be achieved. However, it is
considered that dormer windows of a smaller scale would likely allow for a hipped
roof to be formed and would be a more appropriate solution in this case. 
The external material finishes to the dormer walls and windows would draw upon the
existing slate roof and window design to the main dwellinghouse. However, it is not
considered that this would outweigh the inappropriate flat roof box design of the
dormer windows. Therefore, it is not considered the proposal would be distinctive in
terms of the roof design of the main house and of existing dormer windows in the
surrounding area. 
'Safe and Pleasant'

Page 18

21/01036/PP
The proposed dormer windows to the front and rear of the house would face onto
the public road at Stoneyholm Road and the applicant's own rear garden ground
respectively. It is not considered that the proposal would give rise to any privacy
impacts to neighbours. Similarly, there would be no sunlight/daylight impacts. 
The proposal would increase the total number of bedrooms within the house from 3
to 4. However, there is extensive garden ground/driveway to the front and side of the
house to comfortably accommodate the appropriate off-street parking arrangements
for a house of this size. Therefore, there would not be any advise transport or
parking impacts. 
Despite the above, and as considered earlier in the Analysis, it is noted that the
proposal would be readily visible from public viewpoints on Stoneyholm Road
(particularly the front dormer window) and that the proposed flat roof box design
would be inappropriate and out of keeping with the roof design to the main
dwellinghouse and existing dormer windows to neighbouring housing. It is
considered that this would have a detrimental impact on the visual amenity of both
the application site and the surrounding streetscape. 
'Adaptable'
The proposal would allow for the enlargement of the upper floor of the
dwellinghouse to form 2 no. new bedrooms for the enjoyment of existing and future
occupants. However, as noted above, it is considered that the proposal would be
inappropriate in terms of the proposed flat roof box design, which would have a
detrimental visual impact to the surrounding area. 
Given the above observations, it is not considered that the proposal meets the
relevant qualities of a successful place as identified in Strategic Policy 2
(Placemaking). 
Based on the above observations, the proposal does not accord with the relevant
policies of the LDP and there are no other material considerations to indicate
otherwise. Therefore, planning permission should be refused. 
Decision 
Refused 
Case Officer - Mr Joe Thompson

Page 19

21/01036/PP 
Appendix 1 - Drawings relating to decision 
Drawing Title  Drawing Reference 
(if applicable)
Drawing Version
(if applicable)
Full Layout - Existing and
Proposed
01   
Proposed Elevations 01   
Proposed Cross Section 03   
Location Plan loc

Page 20

Appendix 3

Page 21

North Ayrshire Council
Comhairle Siorrachd Ai1r a Tuath
Caitriona McAuley : Head Of Service (Economic Development & Regeneration)
REFUSAL OF PLANNING PERMISSION
No N/21/01036/PP
(Original Application No. N/100490994-001)
Type of Application:
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (SCOTLAND) ACT, 1997,
AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING ETC (SCOTLAND) ACT 2006.
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE) (SCOTLAND)
REGULATIONS 2013
To : Mr Colin Clark
c/o Ayrshire Architecture
2 Turnberry Wynd
Irvine
Ayrshire
KA114DP
With reference to your application received on 9 November 2021 for planning permission under the above mentioned
Acts and Orders for:-
Formation of dormer windows to front and rear of detached dwelling house
at 48 Stoneyholm Road
Kilbirnie
Ayrshire
KA25 7JS
North Ayrshire Council in exercise of their powers under the above-mentioned Acts and Orders hereby refuse planning
permission on the following grounds :-
1. By reason of their size and flat roof 'box' design, the proposed dormer windows would be contrary to the aims
of Strategic Policy 2 (Placemaking) of the adopted North Ayrshire Local Development Plan (LDP), the stated
purpose of which is to ensure "all development contributes to making quality places." The policy also seeks to
"safeguard, and where possible enhance environmental quality through the avoidance of adverse
environmental or amenity impacts." In this case, it is considered that the proposed dormers would be out of
character with the design of the dwellinghouse and neighbouring houses within the street, all to the detriment
of the character and amenity of the area.
Dated this : 18 February 2022
for the North Ayrshire Council
(See accompanying notes)
Appendix 4

Page 22

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (SCOTLAND) ACT 1997
AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING ETC (SCOTLAND) ACT 2006.
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE) (SCOTLAND)
REGULATIONS 2013 – REGULATION 28
Caitriona McAuley : Head Of Service (Economic Development & Regeneration)
FORM 2
1. If the applicant is aggrieved by the decision to refuse permission for or approval required by a condition in
respect of the proposed development, or to grant permission or approval subject to conditions, the applicant
may require the planning authority to review the case under section 43A of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997 within three months from the date of this notice. The notice of review should be
addressed to Committee Services, Chief Executive's Department, Cunninghame House, Irvine, North
Ayrshire, KA12 8EE.
2. If permission to develop land is refused or granted subject to conditions and the owner of the land claims
that the land has become incapable of reasonably beneficial use in its existing state and cannot be rendered
capable of reasonably beneficial use by the carrying out of any development which has been or would be
permitted, the owner of the land may serve on the planning authority a purchase notice requiring the
purchase of the owner of the land's interest in the land in accordance with Part 5 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997.