Democracy Spraffa

20240522_PPSL Committee, 10/06/2024 Pre-Agenda Briefing of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee

Argyll and Bute Council · 19 June 2024
Back to Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee — 19 June 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

MINUTES of MEETING of PLANNING, PROTECTIVE SERVICES AND LICENSING COMMITTEE
held BY MICROSOFT TEAMS on WEDNESDAY, 22 MAY 2024 
Present: Councillor Kieron Green (Chair) 
Councillor John Armour
Councillor Gordon Blair
Councillor Amanda Hampsey
Councillor Daniel Hampsey
Councillor Graham Hardie 
Councillor Fiona Howard
Councillor Andrew Kain
Councillor Paul Donald Kennedy
Councillor Dougie Philand
Councillor Peter Wallace 
Attending: Shona Barton, Governance Manager
Matt Mulderrig, Development Policy and Housing Manager
Peter Bain, Development Manager
Sandra Davies, Major Applications Team Leader
Kirsty Sweeney, Area Team Leader – Helensburgh and Lomond/Bute and
Cowal
Arlene Knox, Senior Planning Officer
Shelley Gould, Senior Planning Officer
Emma Shaw, Planning Officer 
The Chair ruled, and the Committee agreed, to vary the order of business and take
Agenda item 11 (Simplified Planning Zones: Proposed Closure of Project), Agenda
item 12 (Scottish Government Consultation: Masterplan Consent Area Regulations)
and Agenda item 13 (Masterplan Consent Area Statement) after Agenda item 3
(Minutes) in order to facilitate the Officer attending at another meeting. 
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 
Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Jan Brown, Audrey Forrest, Mark
Irvine and Liz McCabe. 
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
Councillor Douglas Philand declared a non-financial interest in planning application
reference 23/00185/PP as he was a close personal friend of the leaseholder of the land. 
He left the meeting and took no part in the consideration of this application which is dealt
with at item 7 of this Minute. 
3. MINUTES 
a) The Minute of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee held on 7
February and 19 March 2024 was approved as a correct record. 
b) The Minute of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee held on 20
March 2024 at 11.00 am was approved as a correct record. 
c) The Minute of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee held on 20
March 2024 at 2.00 pm was approved as a correct record. 
d) The Minute of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee held on 26
March 2024 at 10.00 am was approved as a correct record.

Page 2

e) The Minute of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee held on 26
March 2024 at 11.00 am was approved as a correct record. 
f) The Minute of the Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee held on 26
March 2024 at 2.00 pm was approved as a correct record. 
* 4. SIMPLIFIED PLANNING ZONES: PROPOSED CLOSURE OF PROJECT 
A report advising of the proposed closure of the Scottish Government Simplified Planning
Zones (SPZ) Pilot Project, which was being progressed jointly by Development Policy
(Planning and Regulatory Services) and Housing (Community and Culture) in association
with a private development on behalf of the Scottish Government, was considered. 
Argyll and Bute proposed a project for the pilot that consisted of a remote rural island
location (Mull) with a green field site in private control and a Main Town (Lochgilphead)
location on a brown field site in Council ownership.  Due to a range of issues it has
become unfeasible to progress the project to a successful conclusion. 
Decision 
The Committee agreed to: 
1. note and consider the information in the report; 
2. recommend to the Policy and Resources Committee, the closure of the project with the
return of unspent monies to the Scottish Government; and 
3. continue to support the development of the sites through the normal planning process,
utilising information gained during the project where possible. 
(Reference: Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Development and
Economic Growth dated 7 February 2024, submitted) 
5. SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT CONSULTATION: MASTERPLAN CONSENT AREA
REGULATIONS 
The Planning (Scotland) Act 2019 introduced Masterplan Consent Areas (MCAs) as a new
upfront consenting mechanism for development proposals.  As well as planning consent
an MCA can also potentially grant Roads Construction Consent, Conservation Area
Consent and Listing Building Consent. 
A report advising of the Scottish Government Masterplan Consent Areas – draft
regulations consultation and seeking approval for the proposed response to the
consultation was considered. 
Decision 
The Committee agreed to: 
1. note this report and the implications of the proposed regulations; and 
2. approve the response on this consultation to the Scottish Government in Appendix 1 of
the report.

Page 3

(Reference: Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Development and
Economic Growth dated 8 May 2024, submitted) 
6. MASTERPLAN CONSENT AREA STATEMENT 
The Planning (Scotland) Act 2019 introduced Masterplan Consent Areas (MCAs) as a new
upfront consenting mechanism for development proposals. 
A separate report is with this PPSL that addresses the proposed response to the Scottish
Government consultation on the proposed Masterplan Consent Area Regulations. 
A report advising that The 2019 Act introduces a duty on planning authorities to
periodically (at least once in each 5 year period) consider the desirability of making an
MCA scheme for a part or parts of their district and to publish a statement of how they
have fulfilled this duty was considered. 
Decision 
The Committee agreed to approve the publication of the statement set out in Appendix 1
of this report relating to the duty to consider the desirability of making an MCA scheme. 
(Reference: Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Development and
Economic Growth dated 8 May 2024, submitted) 
Having declared an interest in the following item Councillor Dougie Philand left the
meeting at this point. 
7. TORLOISK ESTATE: CONVERSION AND EXTENSION OF STONE BARN TO
FORM DWELLINGHOUSE, INSTALLATION OF SEPTIC TANK AND
FORMATION OF VEHICULAR ACCESS: LAND WEST OF LAGGANULVA
FARM, ULVA FERRY, ISLE OF MULL (REF: 23/00185/PP) 
The Planning Officer spoke to the terms of the report and to supplementary report number
1 which advised of late representations and an amendment to condition 15.  She also
advised of further contact from the tenant farmer requesting that a discretionary hearing
be held.  The proposal is seeking to secure planning permission for the conversion of, and
extension to, an existing barn to form a dwellinghouse, and the installation of a septic tank
and the formation of a vehicular access. 
The proposal has elicited 22 objections which relate largely to the conversion of the
existing barn to form a dwelling house and the resultant loss of its existing use for
agricultural purposes.  The loss of the agricultural use of the existing barn is not, in itself, a
material planning consideration as it is a privately owned building that is not afforded any
protection status.  The Applicant has, at the insistence of the planning authority,
addressed this concern through the provision of a replacement agricultural building as
detailed within planning application reference 24/00259/PNAGRI.  Replacement of the
barn would be secured through condition that it be installed before works started on
redevelopment of the barn.   It is not considered that a pre-determination hearing would
add value to the decision making process. 
The proposal is considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of the
Development Plan and National Planning Framework 4 and it was recommended that
planning permission be granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed in
supplementary report number 1.

Page 4

Decision 
The Committee agreed to continue consideration of this application to the meeting of the
PPSL Committee on 19 June 2024 and to request from Planning Officers information on
what the impact this proposed development would have on access to, and operation of the
remaining agricultural land in terms of Policy 83 of LDP2 – Safeguarding Agricultural and
Croft Land.   
(Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 8 May 2024
and supplementary report number 1 dated 21 May 2024, submitted) 
Councillor Dougie Philand returned to the meeting at this point. 
8. THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT: SECTION 36 CONSULTATION FOR
ERECTION OF 13 TURBINES EACH UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 180 METRES IN
HEIGHT TO BLADE TIP: LAND APPROXIMATELY 6KM NORTH WEST OF
INVERARAY AND 4.5KM EAST OF DALAVICH (REF: 23/00795/S36) 
The Senior Planning Officer spoke to the terms of the report.  Consideration was given to
a recommended response to the Scottish Government’s Energy Consents Unit and
Deployment Unit consultation on the Section 36 Application for the erection of 13 turbines
each up to a maximum of 180 metries in height to blade tip at land approximately 6 km
north west of Inveraray and 4.5 km east of Dalavich. 
The site is located on the plateau between Loch Awe to the north west and Loch Fyne to
the south east and within the Kames River, Allt Blarghour, River Aray and Douglas Water
catchments. 
This report reviews the policy considerations which are applicable to this proposal and the
planning merits of the development, the views of bodies consulted by the Scottish
Government along with other consultations undertaken by the Council, and third party
opinion expressed to the Scottish Government. 
It was recommended that the ECU be notified that Argyll and Bute Council does not object
to the proposed development and to recommend the ECU to consider mitigation and
conditions as detailed in the report of handling. 
Decision 
The Committee agreed that the ECU be notified accordingly that Argyll and Bute Council
objects to the proposed development unless the following mitigation recommended by the
Council’s Landscape Consultant is undertaken to the satisfaction of the Planning
Authority: 
Mitigation 
That consideration should be given to the mitigation suggested by the Council’s
Landscape Consultant as follows: 
• The well-wooded nature of the Loch Awe area restricts open views across and along
the loch but where these views do occur, they are particularly valuable for their scenic
qualities. The loch shores near Dalavich comprise one of these important open areas

Page 5

as does the road between Loch Awe and Loch Avich and the shores and waters of
Loch Avich. The proposal appears poorly designed from these areas and it is
strongly recommended that the layout of turbines is reviewed by the applicant
from Viewpoints 2, 5 and 11 with the overlapping of Turbines 2, 8 and 10
resolved and Turbine 13 omitted as this appears dislocated from the main group
of turbines and significantly increases the horizontal extent of the proposal in
these views.    
• In addition, significant adverse effects on the Dun na Cuaiche folly within the Inveraray
Castle GDL are acknowledged likely to arise in the LVIA (Viewpoint 4). This is an
important viewpoint, and the cluttered appearance of the proposal contributes to
significant adverse effects on views. It is therefore strongly recommended that the
layout of turbines is reviewed by the applicant from Viewpoint 4 with the
discordant overlapping of Turbines 2 and 8 resolved and the prominence of
Turbines 1 and 2 reduced by adjusting their location and/or lowering their
height.    
• In addition, the cumulative effects of visible aviation lighting on landscape character
and on views is also a concern and while there will be fewer people affected at night, it
is considered important to retain the character of dark skies within Argyll & Bute,
particularly given the number of wind energy proposals across the region with similar
lighting. It is therefore strongly recommended that radar activated lighting should
be installed at the earliest opportunity as this would substantially reduce the
duration and impact of night-time lighting.    
The Council would also make the following comments in respect to conditions,
ornithology and trunk road matters 
Conditions 
The inclusion of all conditions recommended by consultees in any consent granted by the
ECU.    
Ornithology and Trunk Road Matters 
That the ECU should note that it has not been possible for Argyll & Bute Council to
reach a conclusion on the acceptability of this proposal in respect to Ornithology or
Trunk Road matters. This is because these matters have not been resolved and
discussions are ongoing between the Applicant, the ECU, NatureScot, RSPB
Scotland and Transport Scotland. 
In respect to the outstanding Ornithological matters, Argyll & Bute Council would
defer to the expert advice of NatureScot and the RSPB Scotland. 
In respect to the outstanding Trunk Road matters, Argyll & Bute Council would
defer to the expert advice of Transport Scotland. 
(Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 9 May 2024,
submitted) 
The Chair ruled, and the Committee agreed, to adjourn the meeting at 1.00 pm for a short
comfort break.

Page 6

The Committee reconvened at 1.10 pm with all those Members present as per the
sederunt with the exception of Councillors Armour, Kennedy and Philand. 
9. MRS JOANNA PEACH: ERECTION OF DWELLINGHOUSE AND FORMATION
OF NEW VEHICULAR ACCESS: LAND BETWEEN LAGARIE LODGE AND
LAGARIE HOUSE, TORWOODHILL ROAD, RHU (REF: 23/01502/PP) 
The Area Team Leader spoke to the terms of the report and to supplementary report
number 1, which advised of a further submission by an existing objector.  She also
advised of a typographical error at section Q of the report of handling, which indicated that
the proposed development was not consistent with the Development Plan.  She confirmed
that it should have stated that the proposed development was consistent with the
Development Plan. 
The proposed development relates to the erection of a 4 bed detached dwellinghouse and
formation of a new vehicular access. 
The site is located within the settlement area of Rhu and lies within the Rhu Conservation
Area and the residential property adjacent to the West “Lagarie House” which is a
Category 2B” listed building and within the vicinity of the Category “A” listed “Ardencaple
Hotel”.  The site is also covered by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO). 
The proposal is considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of the
Development Plan and it was recommended that planning permission be granted subject
to the conditions and reasons detailed in the report of handling. 
Decision 
The Committee agreed to grant planning permission subject to the following conditions
and reasons: 
Standard Time Limit Condition  (as defined by Regulation) 
Standard Condition on Soil Management During Construction 
Additional Conditions 
1. PP - Approved Details & Standard Notes – Non EIA Development 
The development shall be implemented in accordance with the details specified on the
application form dated 05.08.2023; , supporting information and, the approved
drawings listed in the table below unless the prior written approval of the planning
authority is obtained for an amendment to the approved details under Section 64 of the
Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. 
Plan Title. Plan Ref. No. Version Date Received
Location Plan 1 of 15 A 22.08.2023
Existing Site Plan 2 of 15 A 22.08.2023
Existing Site
Cross Section
and Photos -
Sheet 1 of 2
3 of 15 - 01.08.2023
Existing Site 4 of 15 - 01.08.2023

Page 7

Cross Section
and Photos -
Sheet 2 of 2
Proposed Site
Plan
5 of 15 B 29.02.2024
Proposed Site
Cross Sections
6 of 15 - 01.08.2023
Proposed Site
Cross Section,
Access Wall
Elevation and
Layout Plan
7 of 15 A 23.08.2023
Proposed
Sightline Plan
8 of 15 D 22.08.2023
Proposed
Elevations and
Sections
9 of 15 - 01.08.2023
Proposed
Floor/Roof Plans
10 of 15 - 01.08.2023
Planning Design
and Access
Statement
11 of 15 - 01.08.2023
Tree Survey
Report
12 of 15 A 28.02.2024
Bat Scoping
Survey Report
13 of 15 - 28.02.2024
Sustainability
checklist 
14 of 15 - 12.03.2024
Sustainable
buildings
checklist 
15 of 15 - 12.03.2024 
Reason: For the purpose of clarity, to ensure that the development is implemented in
accordance with the approved details. 
2. Sustainable Urban Drainage – Notwithstanding Condition 1, details of a sustainable
urban drainage system compliant with the guidance set out in CIRIA’s SuDS Manual
C753 must be submitted to and approved in writing by the planning authority prior to
construction. The surface water drainage shall be operational prior to the development
being brought into use and shall be maintained as such thereafter.  
Reason: To ensure adequate surface water drainage is implemented to prevent
flooding elsewhere. 
3. Landscape and Biodiversity Enhancement - Notwithstanding Condition 1, No
development shall take place until full details of both hard and soft landscape works to
be carried out at the site have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local
planning authority. The approved hard landscaping works shall be carried out prior to
first occupation of the development and the soft landscaping works within the first
planting season following first occupation of the development. The details submitted
shall include:

Page 8

- proposed finished site levels or contours; 
- hard surfacing materials; 
- details of the number, size and location of the trees, shrubs and plants to be retained
and planted together with a planting specification – these shall include compensatory
planting for the trees already identified as to be removed as part of the development; 
- details of measures to enhance biodiversity within the site;
- location and design, including materials, of walls, fences and gates;
- programme for completion and subsequent on-going maintenance. 
Any trees or shrubs dying, removed, being severely damaged or becoming seriously
diseased within five years of planting shall be replaced with trees or shrubs of such
size and species as may be agreed with the Local Planning Authority. 
Reason: In the interests of biodiversity and the natural environment. 
4. External Materials - Notwithstanding Condition 1, Prior to work starting on site
samples of the proposed materials to be used for the external finishes of the
development hereby granted consent shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Planning Authority prior to any work starting on site. 
Reason:  In the interests of visual amenity and in order to integrate the proposal with
its surroundings. 
5. Sustainable Design – Notwithstanding Condition 1, Prior to the commencement of
development, details of the on-site micro renewable energy to provide heat or
electricity to the property and details of the use of the final materials – including details
of any re-cycled materials or local sourced materials and their embodied energy for
each materials, shall first be submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. Thereafter the approved micro renewables and materials must be used in
the development hereby approved. 
Reason: In order to ensure compliance with LDP2 Policy 09 and to ensure the building
is being as energy efficient as possible in order to respond to climate change. 
6. Electric Vehicle Charging – Notwithstanding Condition 1, Prior to the commencement
of development, details of the provision of electric vehicle charge points shall first be
submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter the
electric vehicle charge points must be available for use in the development hereby
approved. 
Reason: In order to ensure compliance with LDP2 Policy 34. 
7. Quality homes – Notwithstanding Condition 1, no development shall commence until
details of the proposed timescale for completion of the approved development have
been submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority. Thereafter, the
development shall be implemented in accordance with the duly approved timescale for
completion unless an alternative timescale for completion is otherwise agreed in
writing with the Planning Authority.  
Reason: In order to comply with the requirements of NPF4 Policy 16F.

Page 9

8. Trees – Notwithstanding Condition 1, All retained trees on site shall be protected at all
times during construction in accordance with the British Standard; BS 5837:2012
(Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction – Recommendations). 
Reason:  The landscape features to be protected are important to the appearance and
character of the site and the surrounding area and are required to successfully
integrate the proposal with its surroundings. 
9. Potential sources of nuisance – Notwithstanding Condition 1, Prior to work starting
on site identification and assessment of all potential sources of nuisance, including
noise/ vibration, dust, and any temporary lighting provided, which may cause
disturbance to nearby residents during the demolition / construction process should be
undertaken by the applicant and submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority.
This should include consideration of intended hours of operation, movement of
vehicles, use of plant and storage of equipment and materials on site.   
For all potential sources of nuisance the applicant will be required to provide a
management plan with details of suitable control measures to be put in place so as to
ensure that construction does not cause loss of amenity to local residents and/or
statutory nuisance.   
Reason: In order to avoid sources of nuisance in the interest of amenity. 
10. Scottish Water – Notwithstanding Condition 1, Prior to the commencement of
development the developer shall submit written evidence to the Planning Authority that
an agreement with Scottish Water is in place for the connection of the proposed
development to the public water supply and waste water sewage network. 
Reason: In the interests of public health and to ensure the availability of an adequate
water supply to serve the proposed development. 
11. Parking and Turning – The parking and turning area shall be laid out and surfaced in
accordance with the details shown on the approved plans prior to the development first
being occupied and shall thereafter be maintained clear of obstruction for the parking
and manoeuvring of vehicles.  
Reason: In the interest of road safety. 
12. PP - Junction with public road:  
Notwithstanding the provisions of Condition 1, the proposed access shall be formed in
accordance with the Council’s Roads Standard Detail Drawing SD 08/005 Rev. B (as
laid out on approved drawings L(9)2D and L(9)4B) and visibility splays of 2.4m metres
to point X by 75.0 metres to point Y from the centre line of the proposed access. The
access shall be surfaced with a bound material in accordance with the stated Standard
Detail Drawing. Prior to work starting on site the access hereby approved shall be
formed to at least base course standard and the visibility splays shall be cleared of all
obstructions such that nothing shall disrupt visibility from a point 1.05 metres above the
access at point X to a point 0.6 metres above the public road carriageway at point Y.
The final wearing surface on the access shall be completed prior to the development
first being brought into use and the visibility splays shall be maintained clear of all
obstructions thereafter.

Page 10

Reason: In the interests of road safety.  
Note to Applicant:  
• A Road Opening Permit under the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 must be obtained
from the Council’s Roads Engineers prior to the formation/alteration of a junction
with the public road.  
The access shall be constructed and drained to ensure that no surface water is
discharged onto the public road. 
13. Bird and Red Squirrel Survey - Notwithstanding Condition 1, Prior to work starting on
site a pre-commencement survey for the presence of birds and red squirrels on site;
shall be carried out by an appropriately qualified person at the optimum time of year
and submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority. In circumstances where
species of interest are identified as being present, or at risk from construction works,
the survey shall further provide suggested avoidance and or mitigation measures,
including timing constraints, to address such presence or risk. The development shall
be implemented in accordance with the measures identified in the duly approved
scheme.    
Reason: In order to establish that the circumstances of the site have not changed
significantly between approval and implementation of the development for the purpose
of protecting natural heritage assets in the interest of nature conservation. 
(Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 7 May 2024
and supplementary report number 1, submitted) 
10. MRS JOANNA PEACH: FORMATION OF NEW VEHICULAR ACCESS
THROUGH THE EXISTING STONE WALL: LAND BETWEEN LAGARIE LODGE
AND LAGARIE HOUSE, TORWOODHILL ROAD, RHU (REF: 23/01503/LIB) 
The Area Team Leader spoke to the terms of the report and to supplementary report
number 1, which advised of a further submission by an existing objector and of an
amendment to the order of the recommended planning conditions and reasons.   
Listed Building Consent is sought for the alterations to form a new vehicular access
through an existing stone wall.  The proposal lies within the Rhu Conservation Area and
the residential property adjacent to the West “Lagarie House” is a Category “B” listed
building.  Additionally, within the vicinity is the Category “A” listed “Ardencaple Hotel”.  The
existing stone wall is deemed to be Category “B” listed by way of curtilage in relation to
“Lagarie House”. 
Having regard to all material considerations it is considered that the proposal is
acceptable and it was recommended that Listed Building Consent be granted subject to
the conditions and reasons detailed in supplementary report number 1. 
Decision 
The Committee agreed to grant Listed Building Consent subject to the following conditions
and reasons:

Page 11

1. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the details specified on the
application form dated 28/07/2023; supporting information and, the approved drawings
listed in the table below. 
Plan Title.  Plan Ref. No.  Version  Date Received 
Location Plan  1 of 8   -   01.08.2023 
Existing Site Plan  2 of 8  -  01.08.2023 
Existing Site Cross
Section and
Photographs 
3 of 8  -  01.08.2023 
Proposed Site Plan  4 of 8   C  22.08.2023 
Proposed Site
Cross Sections 
5 of 8  -   01.08.2023 
Proposed Site
Cross Section
Access Wall
Elevation and
Layout Plan 
6 of 8   -  01.08.2023 
Proposed Sightline
Plan 
7 of 8   C  01.08.2023 
Supporting
Statement 
8 of 8   -  01.08.2023 
Reason: For the purpose of clarity, to ensure that the development is implemented in
accordance with the approved details. 
2. The works permitted to which this consent relates must be begun within three years
from the date of this permission. 
Reason: to comply with Section 16 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation
Areas)(Scotland) Act 1997. 
3. Notwithstanding the effect of condition 1; Samples of the replacement stone to be used
for the of the development hereby granted consent shall be submitted to and approved
in writing by the Planning Authority prior to any work starting on site. 
Reason: To ensure that the materials to be used on the external surfaces of the listed
wall complement and match the existing wall. 
4. Notwithstanding the effect of condition 1; any replacement stone shall match the
detailing including joint thickness of the existing listed stone wall.   
Reason: To ensure that the materials to be used on the external surfaces of the listed
wall complement and match the existing wall. 
5. Notwithstanding the effect of condition 1; should any gateposts be formed additional
details of these shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority
prior to any work starting on site. 
Reason: To ensure that the materials to be used on the external surfaces of the listed
wall complement and match the existing wall.

Page 12

(Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 7 May 2024
and supplementary report number 1, submitted) 
11. THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT ON BEHALF OF ENERGIEKONTOR UK LTD:
ELECTRICITY ACT SECTION 36 CONSULTATION RELEVANT TO
BREACKERIE WIND FARM: LAND APPROXIMATELY 8KM SOUTH WEST OF
CAMPBELTOWN (REF: 23/02230/S36) 
The Senior Planning Officer spoke to the terms of the report and to supplementary report
number 1, which advised of the Applicant raising matters of clarification in relation to the
proposed conditions and their response to NatureScot.   
Consideration was given to a recommended response to the Scottish Government’s
Energy Consents Unit and Deployment Unit consultation on the Section 36 Application for
the construction, 35 year commissioning and subsequent decommissioning, of up to 13
wind turbines with a tip height of up to 200m. 
Spanning approximately 1273 hectares, the site is situated at the southern end of the
Kintyre peninsula within an area of active commercial coniferous forestry. 
This report reviews the policy considerations which are applicable to this proposal and the
planning merits of the development, the views of bodies consulted by the Scottish
Government along with other consultations undertaken by the Council, and third party
opinion expressed to the Scottish Government. 
It was recommended that the ECU be notified that Argyll and Bute Council does not object
to the proposed development subject to the inclusion of conditions recommended by
consultees being included in any consent and subject to further conditions and legal
agreements as discussed with the Applicant to mitigate the specific impacts of the
Breackerie Wind Farm proposal as detailed in the supplementary report number 1. 
During discussion of this application a short adjournment was taken at 2.43 pm to allow
Councillor Blair to seek advice on preparing a competent Motion. 
The Committee reconvened at 3.10 pm. 
Decision 
The Committee agreed that the ECU be notified that Argyll and Bute Council objects to the
proposed development for the following reasons: 
1. Given its proposed location on the terminal section of Kintyre, set apart from the main
spine of the peninsula, the development would be seen as an outlier from the
established pattern of windfarm development in Kintyre which is contained within the
interior uplands of the Kintyre spine and associated with the woodland hinterland. 
2. The Development will have a significant impact on landscape character and visual
impact contrary to Policy 30 and Policy 71 of LDP2 and will also be contrary to NPF4
Policy 11 e (ii). The development will have a significant effect on highly sensitive
coastal and smaller scale landscapes.  This is contrary to the guidance in the
Landscape Wind Energy Capacity Study 2017 (LWECS) which identifies no
opportunities to accommodate large turbines in this area of landscape character.

Page 13

(Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 9 May 2024
and supplementary report 1 dated 21 May 2024, submitted) 
Councillors John Armour and Dougie Philand returned to the meeting during consideration
of the foregoing item. 
12. MINISTRY OF DEFENCE C/O DEFENCE INFRASTRUCTURE ORGANISATION
(DIO): PROPOSAL OF APPLICATION NOTICE FOR THE ERECTION OF 639
SINGLE ACCOMMODATION UNITS (SLU)  FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL WITH
ASSOCIATED SERVICE ACCESS ROAD AND
ENGINEERING/INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS: HM NAVAL BASE CLYDE,
FASLANE, HELENSBURGH (REF: 24/00580/PAN) 
The Senior Planning Officer spoke to the terms of the report.  The proposed site is located
within the H M Clyde Naval Base, located 2km south west of Garelochhead.  The
proposed site has been partially cleared and is surrounded by the built up area of the
Naval Base which fronts onto the Gare Loch to the west.  In terms of the adopted Local
Development Plan 2 (2024), the site is located within the Garelochhead Settlement Area
and borders the Helensburgh/Lomond Countryside Area to the east. 
The report sets out the information submitted to date as part of the Proposal of Application
Notice (PAN) and summarises the policy considerations, against which any future
planning application will be considered as well as potential material considerations and
key issues based upon the information received to date.   
It was recommended that Members note the content of the report and submissions and
provide such feedback as they consider appropriate in respect of the PAN to allow these
matters to be considered by the Applicant in finalising any future planning application
submission. 
Decision 
The Committee noted the content of the report and expressed disappointment that
accommodation for naval personnel was being built on the base and not nearer to the
town centre which would support local services and businesses. 
(Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 9 May 2024,
submitted) 
13. LAGGAN PROPERTIES/BAIRDS MALT: PROPOSAL OF APPLICATION
NOTICE FOR HARVESTING OF PEAT MOSS FOR USE IN MALT WHISKY
PRODUCTION AND RESTORATION OF PREVIOUSLY DRAINED SITES: LAND
AT LAGGAN MOSS, BOWMORE, ISLE OF ISLAY (REF: 24/00661/PAN) 
The Senior Planning Officer spoke to the terms of the report.  The proposed peat
extraction area of Laggan Moss comprises 110ha blanket bog which has historically been
used for peat harvesting.  The proposal site, as identified in the submitted plans,
comprises approximately 12ha of open peat moss land at Laggan Moss, Bowmore.  The
site is located approximately 3km south west of Bowmore and is served by a single
access road that leads from the A846 Port Ellen to Bowmore road and also serves the
Bowmore waste water treatment works and the Bowmore landfill and waste reclamation
site.

Page 14

The site is located within a Countryside Zone.  The entire site lies within both Laggan Bay
and Peninsula designated Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Special Protection
Area (SPA).   
The report sets out the information submitted to date as part of the Proposal of Application
Notice (PAN) and summarises the policy considerations, against which any future
planning application will be considered as well as potential material considerations and
key issues based upon the information received to date.   
It was recommended that Members note the content of the report and submissions and
provide such feedback as they consider appropriate in respect of the PAN to allow these
matters to be considered by the Applicant in finalising any future planning application
submission. 
Decision 
The Committee noted the content of the report and provided no feedback to the Applicant. 
(Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 9 May 2024,
submitted) 
14. UPDATE ON RECENT SCOTTISH MINISTERS SECTION 36 NARACHAN WIND
FARM DECISION 
A report summarising the decision made by Scottish Ministers to refuse Section 36
consent and deemed planning permission for Narachan Wind Farm was before the
Committee for information. 
Decision 
The Committee noted the contents of the report. 
(Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated  29 April 2024,
submitted) 
15. UPDATE ON RECENT SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT PLANNING APPEAL
DECISION 
A report summarising a recent decision by the Scottish Ministers in respect of an appeal
against refusal of planning application reference 22/00678/PP which was dismissed, was
before the Committee for information. 
Decision 
The Committee noted the contents of the report. 
(Reference: Report by Head of Development and Economic Growth dated 22 May 2024,
submitted) 
16. PRIVATE HIRE CARS AND TAXIS LICENSED IN ARGYLL & BUTE 
A report providing an update on the number of private hire cars and taxis across the
licensing authority’s area was before the Committee for information.

Page 15

Decision 
The Committee noted the number of private hire cars and taxis across the licensing
authority’s area as detailed at Appendix 1 and 2 of the report. 
(Reference: Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Legal and Regulatory
Support dated 25 March 2024, submitted) 
The Committee resolved in terms of Section 50(A)(4) of the Local Government (Scotland)
Act 1973 to exclude the press and public for the following 2 items of business on the
grounds that they were likely to involve the disclosure of exempt information as defined in
Paragraph 13 respectively of Part 1 of Schedule 7A to the Local Government (Scotland)
Act 1973. 
17. REQUEST FOR TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 
Consideration was given to a report requesting the serving of a Tree Preservation Order. 
Decision 
The Committee agreed the recommendations in the report. 
(Reference: Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Development and
Economic Growth dated 22 May 2024, submitted) 
18. CONFIRMING A TREE PRESERVATION ORDER 
Consideration was given to a report requesting confirmation of a Tree Preservation Order. 
Decision 
The Committee agreed the recommendations in the report. 
(Reference: Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Development and
Economic Growth dated 22 May 2024, submitted)